RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Triple- and quad-refractory multiple myeloma patients usually have an aggressive course and a poor prognosis. Available therapeutic options are scarce. METHODS: The objective of the current study was to evaluate responses and toxicities of VDTPACE or mCBAD with hematopoietic stem-cell support as a bridge to subsequent therapies in patients with refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included (11 mCBAD, 2 VDTPACE), and 21 cycles of chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell support were delivered. Mean number of previous therapies was 4.8. Stem cells were infused on a median day 9.9 after chemotherapy. Mean time to neutrophil recovery was 18.2 days in patients receiving the first cycle and 15.9 following subsequent cycles. Before therapy, most patients were in PD (77%), PR (15%), or VGPR (8%). Following treatment, the best responses achieved were PR (46%), VGPR (46%), and CR (8%). Median overall and progression-free survivals were 17 and 9 months. There has been no case of non-relapse mortality. In the 21 cycles, the main complications were infectious. CONCLUSION: Intensive chemotherapy can decrease disease burden in patients with relapsed/refractory MM, and stem-cell support can successfully decrease toxicities and treatment-related mortality associated with these regimens and may be a good bridging option.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple , Terapia Recuperativa , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Terapia Combinada , Recurrencia , AdultoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a highly heterogeneous, incurable disease most frequently diagnosed in the elderly. Therefore, data on clinical characteristics and outcomes in the very young population are scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed clinical characteristics, response to treatment, and survival in 103 patients with newly diagnosed MM age 40 years or younger compared with 256 patients age 41-50 years and 957 patients age 51 years or older. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in sex, isotype, International Scoring System, renal involvement, hypercalcemia, anemia, dialysis, bony lesions, extramedullary disease, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The most used regimen in young patients was cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone, followed by cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone and bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone. Of the patients age 40 years or younger, only 53% received autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) and 71.1% received maintenance. There were no differences in overall survival (OS) in the three patient cohorts. In the multivariate analysis, only high LDH, high cytogenetic risk, and ASCT were statistically associated with survival. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, younger patients with MM in Latin America have similar clinical characteristics, responses, and OS compared with the elderly.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Anciano , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , América Latina/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed therapies, including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CARTs), have shown remarkable efficacy in patients with late-line myeloma with prior exposure to immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 antibodies. However, optimal sequencing of these agents remains to be determined, and management of these patients once they relapse has become a new unmet need. Fortunately, there are multiple options with demonstrated activity after anti-BCMA therapy, including a different BCMA-directed therapy, non-BCMA-directed CARTs and BsAbs, novel non-T-cell-engaging drugs, and standard triplet/quadruplet regimens or salvage stem cell transplant. Factors to consider when choosing a next therapy after anti-BCMA therapy include patient characteristics and preferences, prior therapies and toxicities, disease biology, timing from last anti-BCMA therapy, and, in the future, BCMA expression and immune profiling. While current data are limited to retrospective studies and small prospective cohorts, the serial use of T-cell-engaging therapies looks particularly promising, especially as BCMA-directed therapies move up earlier in the myeloma treatment course and additional CARTs and BsAbs against alternative targets (eg, G protein-coupled receptor, family C, group 5, member D and Fc receptor-homolog 5) become available. Going forward, ongoing prospective studies, large real-world data sets, and better tools to interrogate antigen expression and immune cell fitness hopefully will provide further insight into how to best individualize therapy for this difficult-to-treat population.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B , Enfermedad Crónica , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
The Second Revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) was published in 2022 and has been validated in several cohorts of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In this study, we investigated a total of 860 patients with MM who received an upfront autologous stem cell transplantation between 2001 and 2021. The median age of the patients was 60 years, with a median overall survival (OS) of 123 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 70 months. We collected the variables included in the ISS, R-ISS, and R2-ISS systems as well as additional standard variables. Our analyses demonstrated that all 3 ISS series systems (ISS, R-ISS, and R2-ISS) exhibited robust discrimination in terms of both OS and PFS among our study cohort. The ISS system effectively stratified patients into 3 risk groups, whereas the R-ISS system accurately identified patients at extremely high or low risk. The R2-ISS system further refined risk stratification by dividing patients into 4 more balanced risk groups. Furthermore, we specifically focused on identifying variables that distinguished patients with OS < 3 years and OS > 10 years within the low-risk R2-ISS stages (I and II) and high-risk R2-ISS stages (III and IV). Our findings revealed that age, hemoglobin, and 1p deletion significantly influenced the classification of patients in the low-risk R2-ISS stage. Additionally, serum light chain, platelet count, age, and the presence of the t(14;16) translocation were found to affect high-risk classification.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Autólogo , Trasplante de Células Madre , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
In immunotherapy with T cells genetically modified to express chimeric antigen receptors (CAR), autologous lymphocytes are extracted from the patient, genetically modified to obtain CAR-T cells, and reintroduced into the patient to attack cancer cells. The success of this therapy has been achieved in the area of CD19-positive leukemias and lymphomas, being approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma. CARs are proteins that combine antibody specificity with T-cell cytotoxicity. The most common toxicities associated with therapy were not predicted by preclinical testing and include cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and cytopenias. These toxicities are usually reversible. One of the main challenges facing the field is the high economic cost that therapy entails, so the search for ways to reduce this cost must be a priority. In addition, other challenges to overcome include the situation that not all patients are supplied with the product and the existence of long waiting times for the start of therapy. The aim of this review is to present the development of the structure of CAR-T cells, the therapies approved to date, the toxicity associated with them, and the advantages and limitations that they present as immunotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Linfoma , Mieloma Múltiple , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/metabolismo , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Antígenos CD19 , Linfoma/metabolismo , Inmunoterapia , Linfocitos T , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/metabolismoRESUMEN
Health equity is today an important objective to evenly reach the population among different health care systems. This article will focus on diagnosis and treatment access inequalities in Argentina. Although different aspects must be optimized to overcome access barriers worldwide, access inequalities in some regions of Argentina may depend basically on the type of health coverage or insurance. Health care in Argentina is divided into Public, Social security and Private care systems. Access to diagnosis and disease monitoring will vary according whether the patient is under each of these systems. Reducing inequalities may help target some important aspects not covered today and that may directly impact patients' outcome. Disparities in health cancer care were analyzed according to Public, Social security and Private sectors. A disadvantage in resource access, inadequate funding and limited medical infrastructures are common characteristics of the public health care systems. In our country the disparity between the public and private sectors in terms of timely diagnosis, stage of disease at diagnosis, accuracy of diagnosis, access to novel agents and transplantation is notorious, with the public sector lagging behind in access to diagnostic and treatment resources. While the Private sector has treatment outcomes comparable to those of high-income countries, challenges remain in the Public sector for patients who rely on early and accurate diagnosis and timely access to treatment. There is an urgent need to provide equitable care for multiple myeloma and CLL patients and reduce the emotional and financial consequences of the disease for the patient. A survey about diagnosis and therapeutic resources was conducted between April and May 2023 among large centers in the Public, Social security and Private systems. A total of 49 hematologists from 31 institutions from five provinces of Argentina participated in the survey. We observed differences between the different systems with more access for the Private system on genetic diagnosis (FISH-IGVH access). More CLL patients in the public and social security systems were treated with CIT reflecting the inaccessibility in these sectors of more expensive targeted therapies rather than a gap in information since the Public centers surveyed were large hospitals with knowledgeable physicians. Access to different treatments both in first-line and relapsed settings was more equitable in the treatment of multiple myeloma for the different systems with the exception of access to daratumumab in first-line that was extremely infrequent in the public coverage. With increasing cost and treatment complexity as the introduction of CARTs and BITEs for CLL and MM, the gap will probably deepen more if the problem is not treated comprehensively by all the actors of the health sector: government, physicians, patients' organizations and pharmaceutical companies.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Argentina/epidemiología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de SaludRESUMEN
Cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) such as t(4;14), t(14;16), and del(17p), are associated with a poor prognosis in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients. However, there is scarce information regarding the Latin-American population. This study aims to analyze the impact of t(4;14), t(14;16), and del(17p) on the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of transplant-eligible newly-diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients in Latin America. Retrospective survival analysis based on the Grupo de Estudio Latinoamericano de MM (GELAMM) registry, including all adult patients with NDMM harboring CA t(4;14), t(14;16), and/or del(17p). Fifty-nine patients were included; the median age was 57 years, 55.9% males, 22% ISS-I, 25.4% ISS-II, and 47.5% ISS-III. The majority (89.8%) had one alteration, whereas 10.2% had del(17p) and t(4;14). The frequencies of CA were del(17p) in 61.0%, t(4;14) in 25.4%, and t(14;16) in 3,4%. Autologous stem cell transplantation was performed in 36 cases, 20 patients did not use this consolidative strategy, and this data was missed in three cases. Five-year OS for the entire cohort was 60.8% and 5-year PFS was 28.1%. Bortezomib-based induction regimen (BBR) (p=0.029), consolidation with ASCT (p<0.001), and maintenance therapy (p=0.004) were associated with an improved 5-year OS. In the multivariate analysis, ASCT was the only variable with a positive impact on OS (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.033 to 0.34, p<0.001). The median PFS presented a non-statistically significant benefit in BBR, ASCT, and maintenance therapy groups. BBR induction, ASCT, and maintenance therapy were associated with improved OS in high-risk NDMM patients.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Autólogo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although plerixafor in association with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) can improve mobilization and collection of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) by leukapheresis, cost may limit its clinical application. The present study systematically reviews economic evaluations of plerixafor plus G-CSF usage compared to G-CSF alone and compares different strategies of plerixafor utilization in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients eligible for autologous HSC transplantation. AREAS COVERED: Relevant economic evaluations, partial or complete, were searched on PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for a period ending 30 June 2021. This systematic review was reported following the PRISMA Statement. Six economic evaluations were included, considering the use of upfront or just-in-time plerixafor compared to G-CSF alone or other plerixafor strategies. Most comparisons showed both increased cost and health benefits with the addition of plerixafor. Most analyses favored just-in-time plerixafor compared to upfront plerixafor, with a probable preference for broader cutoffs for just-in-time plerixafor initiation. EXPERT OPINION: Plerixafor is a potentially cost-effective technology in the mobilization of HSC in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphomas eligible for autologous HSC transplantation. There is a decreased number of leukapheresis sessions and remobilizations and a higher yield of CD34+ cells.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Compuestos Heterocíclicos , Linfoma , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética , Leucaféresis , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Trasplante Autólogo , Compuestos Heterocíclicos/metabolismo , Linfoma/terapia , Linfoma/metabolismo , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/metabolismo , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/patología , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos , Bencilaminas/metabolismoRESUMEN
Although hematologic neoplasms have been on the vanguard of cancer therapies that led to notable advances in therapeutic efficacy, many patients face significant symptom burden, which make them eligible for early palliative care (PC) integration. However, previous reports demonstrated that hematological malignancies receive more aggressive care at the end-of-life and are less likely to receive care from specialist palliative services compared to solid tumors. Our aim was to characterize symptom burden, performance status and clinical characteristics of a cohort of hematologic malignancies patients referred to PC outpatient consultation, according to their diagnosis. Fifty-nine hematological malignancies patients referred to PC consultation between January 2018 and September 2021 were included. Clinical and laboratory data were evaluated retrospectively by medical charts analysis. Patients exhibited high ESAS and reduced PPS scores at the time of PC referral. Acute leukemia and multiple myeloma patients had the highest symptom burden scores; in spite of this, median time from the first PC consultation until death was only 3 and 4 months, respectively. In conclusion, we identified that hematologic neoplasms patients are highly symptomatic and are frequently referred to PC in end stages of their disease.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Mieloma Múltiple , Neoplasias , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Derivación y Consulta , Mieloma Múltiple/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation is the standard procedure for multiple myeloma and the grafts are usually cryopreserved. Previous studies reported advantages in the use of fresh peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) autotransplantation compared to cryopreservation of the grafts. This study compared the transplant-related outcomes of two graft preservation methods: fresh storage (4°C/72 h) and cryopreservation (-80°C). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed an analysis of 45 patients with multiple myeloma under autotransplantation (17 fresh and 28 cryopreserved) from 2017 to 2021. Fresh PBSC were maintained in the refrigerator for three days in a concentration up to 300 × 103 TNC/µL. Cryopreserved PBSC were concentrated by plasma reduction after centrifugation (950 g/10 min/4°C) and an equal volume of cryoprotection solution was added for a final concentration of 300 × 103 TNC/µL, 5% DMSO, 6% hydroxyethyl starch, and 3% human albumin. RESULTS: Neutrophil engraftment was significantly faster with fresh PBSCs (10 vs. 11.5 days, p = 0.045). Adverse effects were more common in cryopreserved PBSC transplantation (75% vs. 35.3% patients; p = 0.013). Post transplantation hospital stay was 20 and 22 days for fresh and cryopreserved PBSCs respectively (p = 0.091). There was no difference in platelet engraftment time (10.5 days for both; p = 0.133), number of antibiotics used after transplantation (3 for fresh and 2.5 for cryopreserved; p = 0.828), days of antibiotic use after transplantation (12.2 days for fresh and 13.3 days for cryopreserved, p = 0.579), and overall survival (p = 0.736). CONCLUSION: The infusion of fresh PBSC refrigerated for up to three days is effective and safe for autologous transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma, which is a useful alternative to cryopreserved PBSC.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple , Células Madre de Sangre Periférica , Antibacterianos , Criopreservación/métodos , Dimetilsulfóxido , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Albúmina Sérica Humana , Almidón , Trasplante Autólogo/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma in Latin America (LATAM) face multiple challenges related to the lack of resources according to low- and middle-income in the region. AREAS COVERED: in this narrative review, several aspects of myeloma multiple epidemiology, diagnostic methods and risk stratification, medication commonly employed, and treatment results in LATAM are discussed. CONCLUSION: Patients usually are diagnosed in an advanced stage of the disease, and routine and risk evaluations are usually not ideal due to lack of access to different studies. Treatment is limited in many cases to the use of thalidomide and dexamethasone with and without cyclophosphamide. Access to autologous stem cell transplantation is far from ideal. Efforts must be made at the national health system level in our countries to offer our vast majority of MM patients a real chance to improve results in the diagnostic, risk stratification, and treatment. Currently, several groups in our region are working to make an impact in the field of MM.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell derived clonal disorder that represents around 1% of all newly diagnosed neoplasms. Limited data regarding MM treatment in Latin America is available, and access to novel agents for a substantial portion of the population is limited by their high costs. MATERIALS (OR PATIENTS) AND METHODS: RENEHOC is a bidirectional (retrospective and prospective) multicenter observational registry of hematological malignancies in Colombia. MM patients included up to July 2020 were analyzed on this report. RESULTS: 890 are reported with a median follow-up of 18 months (IQR: 7-42 months). Patients were classified by age group (≤ or > 65 years). Median age at diagnosis was 67 years (IQR: 59-75 years) and 47.1% of patients were women. 709 patients (79.6%) received Bortezomib-based schemes as part of the first line. Two hundred and fifty-two patients (28.3%) were consolidated with Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in first-line. ASCT consolidation and age were the main independent factors influencing outcomes; in the non-ASCT cohort, 5-year overall survival was 48.7% (CI 41.8-55.2) compared to 80.7% (CI 73-86.4) in ASCT patients. CONCLUSION: This data depicts the reality of MM in Colombia, which likely reflects other Latin American countries, where access barriers to diagnosis and treatment are echoed in advanced stage diagnosis and a low rate of transplants. These seem to negatively impact survival despite the availability of most novel drugs approved for this disease. Thus, emphasizing the paradox that prevails in most of the region: availability without equitable access.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple , Anciano , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Colombia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/epidemiología , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
There is data suggesting that the clinical behavior of multiple myeloma (MM) may be different in Latin Americans than in Caucasian or African-Americans, consistent with a less aggressive course of MM in Latinos. We analyzed the overall survival (OS) of 139 persons with MM in a single institution in México, as well the variables which were associated with long-term OS. Of all patients, the median OS was 11 years whereas the 5-year and 10-year OS were 75% and 55% respectively. The analysis of variables showed that the variable related with five-year survival was having hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), whereas the variables related with 10-year survival were HSCT, age at diagnosis (patients younger than 50 survived longer), light chain type (kappa survived longer) and ISS stage (stage I patients survived longer). The only variable associated with both 5 and 10-year survival was HSCT. A plateau in the OS was reached after 10 years, both in grafted and non-grafted patients. We have confirmed the critical role of HSCT in the prognosis of persons with MM, independent of the induction treatment or the maintenance post-transplant, and we have identified a better prognosis in this cohort, as compared with African-Americans or Caucasians, since the proportion of long-term survivors in our group is seemingly better than those in other populations.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple , Estudios de Cohortes , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Multiple myeloma (MM) patients frequently attain a bone marrow (BM) minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity status in response to treatment. We identified 568 patients who achieved BM MRD negativity following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and maintenance combination therapy with an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. BM MRD was evaluated by next-generation flow cytometry (sensitivity of 10-5 cells) at 3- to 6-month intervals. With a median follow-up of 9.9 years from diagnosis (range, 0.4-30.9), 61% of patients maintained MRD negativity, whereas 39% experienced MRD conversion at a median of 6.3 years (range, 1.4-25). The highest risk of MRD conversion occurred within the first 5 years after treatment and was observed more often in patients with abnormal metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities (95% vs 84%; P = .001). MRD conversion was associated with a high risk of relapse and preceded it by a median of 1.0 years (range, 0-4.9). However, 27% of MRD conversion-positive patients had not yet experienced a clinical relapse, with a median follow-up of 9.3 years (range, 2.2-21.2). Landmark analyses using time from ASCT revealed patients with MRD conversion during the first 3 years had an inferior overall and progression-free survival compared with patients with sustained MRD negativity. MRD conversion correctly predicted relapse in 70%, demonstrating the utility of serial BM MRD assessment to complement standard laboratory and imaging to make informed salvage therapy decisions.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mieloma Múltiple , Médula Ósea , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasia Residual/diagnóstico , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
In this article, the perspectives on both the diagnosis and treatment of acute leukemias, chronic leukemias, multiple myeloma, anemia, platelet, and coagulation disorders are briefly discussed. We emphasize the limitations facing the practice of hematology in low- and middle-income countries.
Asunto(s)
Anemia , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea , Hematología , Leucemia , Mieloma Múltiple , Anemia/diagnóstico , Anemia/terapia , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/terapia , Humanos , Leucemia/diagnóstico , Leucemia/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapiaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Background: Multiple myeloma is a disease of the elderly. However, 40% of patients are diagnosed before 65 years old. Outcomes regarding age as a prognostic factor in MM are heterogeneous. Method: We retrospectively analyzed clinical characteristics, response to treatment and survival of 282 patients with active newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma, comparing results between patients younger and older than 65 years. Main results: The frequency of multiple myeloma in those younger than 66 years was 53.2%. Younger patients presented with a more aggressive disease, more advanced Durie-Salmon stage (85.3% vs 73.5%; p = 0.013), extramedullary disease (12.7% vs 0%; p < 0.001), osteolytic lesions (78.7% vs 57.6%; p < 0.001) and bone plasmacytoma (25.3% vs 11.4%; p = 0.003). In spite of this, the overall response rate was similar between groups (80.6% vs 81.4%; p = 0.866). The overall survival was significantly longer in young patients (median, 65 months vs 41 months; p = 0.001) and higher in those who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The main cause of death was disease progression in both groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that creatinine ≥2 mg/dl, extramedullary disease, ≤very good partial remission and non-autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are independent risk factors for shorter survival. Conclusion: Although multiple myeloma patients younger than 66 years of age have an aggressive presentation, this did not translate into an inferior overall survival, particularly in those undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trasplante de Células Madre , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Introduction Multiple myeloma is a progressive and incurable hematological disease characterized by disordered and clonal multiplication of plasmacytes in the bone marrow. The main clinical manifestations are caused by the presence of neoplastic cells in bone tissue, as well as the excessive production of immunoglobulins and normal humoral immunity suppression. Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody that has promising results in managing the multiple myeloma disease. Objective This study aimed to investigate the scientific evidence concerning the impact of the cytomegalovirus infections in the daratumumab treatment course in extensively pretreated multiple myeloma patients. Method To this end, an integrative literature review was performed in different databases, comprising a 5-year period. Results The studies analysis revealed that the cytomegalovirus infection reactivation can occur during the use of daratumumab in multiple myeloma patients previously treated, which led to treatment discontinuation, compromised the drug efficacy and favored the disease progression. Moreover, it was observed that even with prophylactic antiviral therapy there was an infection reactivation in some cases, as well as deaths, in more severe situations. Conclusion Thus, even considering that few reports on such a topic are available in the scientific literature, the present review showed that cytomegalovirus reactivation can impair daratumumab therapy, mainly in multiple myeloma patients heavily pretreated. In addition, this study could contribute as a tool for the clinical decision and management of adverse effects in medical practices, demonstrating the importance of patient monitoring for the possibility of cytomegalovirus reactivation in heavily pretreated myeloma patients.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Virosis , Revisión , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Sistema Inmunológico , InmunoterapiaAsunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Hidrazinas/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Triazoles/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Based on personal experiences, recommendations for physicians treating patients with multiple myeloma (MM) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are proposed. RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) Implement strategies to keep the patient in the best possible condition for the longest time, in addition to focusing on ways to avoid financial toxicity; (2) if lenalidomide is unavailable, start treatment with thalidomide and dexamethasone, include, if possible, bortezomib; (3) conduct an outpatient-based autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in all eligible patients; (4) use thalidomide as post-ASCT maintenance treatment if lenalidomide is unavailable for the standard risk patients; (5) monitor monoclonal proteins with serum protein electrophoresis and free light chain measurements; (6) employ novel drugs in cases of relapsed or refractory disease; and (7) do not forget supportive therapy. The therapeutic recommendations to treat patients with MM are somewhat different for physicians working in LMICs, compared with those treating patients in high-income countries. These are relevant since more than 50% of the inhabitants of the world live in LMICs, thus indicating that the vast majority of patients with MM are being treated in resource-constrained settings. As time goes by, physicians may acquire the ability to analyze and express their feelings and experiences about topics in the practice of medicine in which they could have learned lessons (1). Since 1980, we have been treating patients with multiple myeloma (MM); to date, we have been personally involved in the study and treatment of more than 300 patients with this disease (2). Having gained experience dealing with MM patients in underprivileged circumstances, such as those prevailing in our country: México, having explored different ideas, treatments, and methods, and being aware of the financial implications which may impact our selection of therapeutic strategies and recommendations, we felt that it was appropriate to share in this article some of these ideas with practitioners around the world who are involved in the treatment of patients with MM in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/economía , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Países en Desarrollo , Dexametasona/economía , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/economía , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/economía , Pobreza , Trasplante de Células Madre/economía , Talidomida/economía , Talidomida/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The kinetics of hematopoietic recovery after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) may be affected by laboratory procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of characteristics of the cryopreserved units of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) on postthawing cell viability and engraftment outcomes after ASCT. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including individuals referred for ASCT. Cryopreservation was conducted at a single processing facility between 2014 and 2019, and patients received clinical care at six transplant centers. Covariates and outcome data were retrieved from participants' records. RESULTS: The study population comprised 619 patients (345 [55.7%] male). Median age was 53 years. Multiple myeloma was the most common diagnosis (62.7%). Higher preapheresis CD34+ cell count, lower nucleated cell (NC) concentration per cryobag, and composition of the cryoprotectant solution (5% dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO] and 6% hydroxyethyl starch) were statistically significantly associated with higher postthawing cell viability. The linear regression model for time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment included the infused CD34+ cell dose and the composition of the cryoprotectant solution. Patients who had PBSC cryopreserved using 10% DMSO solution presented six times higher odds (odds ratio [OR] = 6.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2-21.1; p = .001) of delayed neutrophil engraftment (>14 days) and two times higher odds (OR = 2.3, 95%CI: 1.4-3.7; p = .001) of prolonged hospitalization (>18 days). DISCUSSION: The study showed that mobilization efficacy, NC concentration, and the composition of the cryoprotectant solution significantly affected postthawing cell viability. In addition, the composition of the cryoprotectant solution significantly impacted engraftment outcomes and time of hospitalization after ASCT.