Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.338
Filtrar
1.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 53(9): 640-646, 2024 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39226598

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgical site infection (SSI) after dermatological surgery is associated with poor outcomes. Developing clinical prediction rules based on the predicted probability of infection might encourage guided prophylaxis and judicious prescribing. The purpose of this study was to develop a clinical prediction rule based on identified risk factors for SSI in a large general practice patient cohort. METHOD: We examined a large, pooled dataset from four randomised controlled trials performed in a regional centre of North Queensland, Australia. Multivariable logistic regression identified a prediction model. Bootstrapping was used for internal validation. A scoring system was based on predicted probabilities of infection. RESULTS: The final prediction rule included age >55 years and the anatomical site, histology and complexity of the excision. The area under the curve was 0.704. DISCUSSION: Our prediction rule encourages judicious use of prophylaxis in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Medicina General , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Medicina General/métodos , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Queensland , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Menores/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Menores/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Menores/efectos adversos , Modelos Logísticos , Reglas de Decisión Clínica
2.
Aust J Prim Health ; 302024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39270058

RESUMEN

Background General practice training in outer metropolitan (OM) areas contributes to patients' access to care. Differences in clinical practice and training in rural versus urban areas have been established, but less is known about OM versus inner metropolitan (IM) differences - whether they offer a trainee learning experience of populations with distinct demographics and healthcare characteristics. This study sought to identify the characteristics and associations of general practice training in New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory OM areas, compared to IM and rural areas. Methods Cross-sectional analyses of data (2016-2020) from the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study, an ongoing cohort study of Australian GP registrars' in-consultation clinical and educational experience and behaviours, were performed. Multinomial logistic regression assessed associations of rural/OM/IM practice location with registrar and practice factors, patient factors, consultation content factors and consultation action factors. Results Overall, 1308 registrars provided data from 177,026 consultations. For several variables, there was a pattern in the differences of associations across rural/OM/IM areas. Experience of care of older patients and Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander health were more likely in OM than IM areas. Care of patients from non-English speaking background was more likely in OM than in rural areas. Possible markers of healthcare access (specialist referrals, and pathology and imaging requests) were less likely in OM than in both IM and rural areas. Conclusions OM areas are distinct (and educationally rich) clinical learning environments, with distinct demographic characteristics and seeming healthcare access limitations. This finding has implications for workforce support and health resource allocation.


Asunto(s)
Medicina General , Servicios de Salud Rural , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicios de Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Nueva Gales del Sur , Anciano , Servicios Urbanos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Australia , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Territorio de la Capital Australiana , Preescolar , Lactante
3.
Musculoskeletal Care ; 22(3): e1937, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39272207

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patients with back pain (BP) and radiating leg pain have poorer clinical outcomes compared to patients with BP alone. We aimed to describe the 1-year clinical course and to identify prognostic factors associated with non-recovery in older BP patients with radiating leg pain. DESIGN: Patients in the BACE cohort aged >55 years with a new episode of BP and radiating leg pain were included (n = 377). Data on clinical outcomes were collected until 1-year follow-up. Uni- and multivariable regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between potential prognostic factors and three non-recovery outcomes at the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: More than half of the patients (65%) did not recover after 12 months. In multivariable analyses, poor self-rated health (odds ratio [OR] 2.34, 95% CI: 1.20-4.56) and BP duration at baseline (OR 1.48, 1.12-1.96) were significantly associated with non-recovery for BP as outcome; age (OR 1.04, 1.03-1.05), smoking (OR 1.14, 1.00-1.30), depressive symptomatology (OR 1.03, 1.02-1.04), kinesiophobia (OR 1.03, 1.02-1.04), poor self-rated health (OR 2.09, 1.83-2.39), baseline disability (OR 1.16, 1.14-1.17), BP duration (OR 1.49, 1.41-1.57), leg pain (OR 1.52, 1.37-1.68), pain during rotation (OR 1.71, 1.53-1.90) and other musculoskeletal complaints (OR 1.34, 1.17-1.52) were associated with disability. No factors were associated with leg pain. CONCLUSIONS: Several prognostic factors were associated with non-recovery in older patients with BP and radiating leg pain. Primary care clinicians should be aware of these factors in managing these patients.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Pronóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Pierna , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ; 12: e55354, 2024 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39235843

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: SMS text messages through mobile phones are a common means of interpersonal communication. SMS text message surveys are gaining traction in health care and research due to their feasibility and patient acceptability. However, challenges arise in implementing SMS text message surveys, especially when targeting marginalized populations, because of barriers to accessing phones and data as well as communication difficulties. In primary care, traditional surveys (paper-based and online) often face low response rates that are particularly pronounced among disadvantaged groups due to financial limitations, language barriers, and time constraints. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the potential of SMS text message-based patient recruitment and surveys within general practices situated in lower socioeconomic areas. This study was nested within the Reducing Alcohol-Harm in General Practice project that aimed to reduce alcohol-related harm through screening in Australian general practice. METHODS: This study follows a 2-step SMS text message data collection process. An initial SMS text message with an online survey link was sent to patients, followed by subsequent surveys every 3 months for consenting participants. Interviews were conducted with the local primary health network organization staff, the participating practice staff, and the clinicians. The qualitative data were analyzed using constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: Out of 6 general practices, 4 were able to send SMS text messages to their patients. The initial SMS text message was sent to 8333 patients and 702 responses (8.2%) were received, most of which were not from a low-income group. This low initial response was in contrast to the improved response rate to the ongoing 3-month SMS text message surveys (55/107, 51.4% at 3 months; 29/67, 43.3% at 6 months; and 44/102, 43.1% at 9 months). We interviewed 4 general practitioners, 4 nurses, and 4 administrative staff from 5 of the different practices. Qualitative data uncovered barriers to engaging marginalized groups including limited smartphone access, limited financial capacity (telephone, internet, and Wi-Fi credit), language barriers, literacy issues, mental health conditions, and physical limitations such as manual dexterity and vision issues. Practice managers and clinicians suggested strategies to overcome these barriers, including using paper-based surveys in trusted spaces, offering assistance during survey completion, and offering honoraria to support participation. CONCLUSIONS: While SMS text message surveys for primary care research may be useful for the broader population, additional efforts are required to ensure the representation and involvement of marginalized groups. More intensive methods such as in-person data collection may be more appropriate to capture the voice of low-income groups in primary care research. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0037.


Asunto(s)
Medicina General , Pobreza , Investigación Cualitativa , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Humanos , Envío de Mensajes de Texto/instrumentación , Envío de Mensajes de Texto/estadística & datos numéricos , Envío de Mensajes de Texto/normas , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Pobreza/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Femenino , Masculino , Medicina General/métodos , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Australia , Persona de Mediana Edad
5.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0308990, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39190726

RESUMEN

Bed bug infestations have been increasing worldwide since the 2000s. Their consequences for health range from skin reactions to major psychological distress. However, epidemiological data is still lacking. This study estimated the incidence of general practice consultations related to bed bugs in France and evaluated factors associated with repercussions on everyday life. We conducted a prospective observational study from March 2019 to April 2020 among 217 GPs in France. Annual and monthly GP consultations related to bed bugs were estimated from the reported cases. Descriptive analyses were performed, and factors associated with repercussions on everyday life were assessed using a logistic regression model. The annual incidence rate of GP consultations related to bed bugs was estimated at 109 per 100,000 inhabitants [95%CI: 92-126]. Bed bug-related consultations occurred in all regions, peaking in the summer. Moderate-to-severe repercussions on everyday life were reported by 39% of the patients. The associated factors with this level of repercussions were: having seen bed bugs (OR = 4.02 [95%CI: 1.6-10.73]), having lesions from scratching (OR = 5.25 [1.65-19.92]), having lesions on the head and the neck (OR = 3.97 [1.52-10.95]) and reporting psychological distress (OR = 6.79 [2.47-20.42]). This study provides new knowledge on GP consultations related to bed bugs in France. These data will help tailor public health programs to the population's needs, including information and training for primary healthcare professionals.


Asunto(s)
Chinches , Medicina General , Médicos Generales , Humanos , Francia/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Generales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Animales , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 295, 2024 Aug 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39127653

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long-lasting symptoms with a possible relation to psychosomatic comorbidity have been described following COVID-19. However, data is sparse in general practice. The trial's objective was to investigate the time-dependent frequency of disease symptoms and relation to psychosomatic comorbidity and daily life impairment (DLI). METHODS: Comparative cohort study of patients reporting a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and uninfected controls in general practice. Participants were recruited in 14 general practices in the greater Munich area. Data collection was questionnaire based with a 12 months follow-up. Descriptive statistics, multivariable regression and bivariate correlations were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of n = 204 cases infected up to 42 months ago (n = 141 Omicron, n = 63 earlier variants), and n = 119 controls were included. Disease symptoms were substantially more prevalent in cases (55-79% vs. 43% within one year of infection). This difference also appeared in the multivariable analysis adjusting for socio-demographics and psychosomatic comorbidity with odds ratios (OR) of 4.15 (p < 0.001) and 3.51 (p = 0.054) for the cohorts with Omicron or earlier variants infection (vs. controls), respectively. It was persistent with earlier variants (OR 1.00 per month, p = 0.903), while a decreasing trend was observed for Omicron (OR 0.89 per month, p < 0.001). DLI was especially correlated with fatigue (r = 0.628). CONCLUSION: DLI, psychosomatic comorbidity and independently increased disease symptoms require holistic treatment of the patient in general practice according to the bio-psycho-social model. A key role in restoring the daily life capability may be attributed to the symptom fatigue.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Comorbilidad , Medicina General , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/epidemiología , Trastornos Psicofisiológicos/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Adulto , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Alemania/epidemiología
7.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 53(8): 574-582, 2024 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39099126

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The burden of disease for Australian children from non-acute conditions is growing; however, little is known about how well prevocational training experiences prepare trainee doctors. This study examines the confidence of general practice registrars in managing paediatric consultations in primary care and whether confidence varies by prevocational training type. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional national survey of Australian general practice registrars that measured confidence in managing paediatric primary care presentations. RESULTS: Respondents reported feeling confident (65%) or very confident (8%) in managing paediatrics in primary care, with higher confidence for those more advanced in their training or with greater exposure to paediatrics during prevocational training. Regression models showed registrars were more likely to report higher confidence when managing acute versus non-acute presentations. DISCUSSION: Although most registrars reported confidence in managing paediatric presentations, confidence levels were notably lower for non-acute conditions and when prevocational training experiences included limited exposure to paediatric patients.


Asunto(s)
Pediatría , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Australia , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Pediatría/métodos , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica/normas , Adulto , Medicina General/métodos , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Persona de Mediana Edad
8.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes ; 188: 79-86, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39043521

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic general practitioners (GP) practice teams were temporally confronted with major challenges which were accompanied by changes in practice organization and service provision. So far, little has been known about the views of patients who visited the GP practice for other than COVID-related reasons with regard to provision and use of GP services, the adjustments in the practice and the work of the practice team members. METHODS: The patient survey is a sub-study of the mixed-methods study VeCo-Praxis (GP healthcare for patients not suffering from COVID during the Corona pandemic) of the research practice network RESPoNsE (Research Practice Network East), which was conducted in the federal states of Berlin, Brandenburg and Thuringia. The questionnaire-based survey was carried out among patients who visited their GP practice in November 2022. The topics covered in the survey were developed by two focus groups consisting of 13 members of the RESPoNsE patient advisory board. The questionnaire was developed and piloted in a participatory approach with the RESPoNsE Patient Advisory Board. The results were analyzed descriptively using SPSS and discussed with the advisory board. RESULTS: 1,405 questionnaires from 37 practices were analyzed. 97% of respondents felt that the treatment they received at their GP practice during the COVID-19 pandemic was good. For the vast majority, appointments and acute consultations, prescriptions, laboratory tests, discussions of diagnostic results, routine follow-up check-ups and health checks were available to a sufficient extent. From the patients' perspective, the practices have successfully adapted to the challenges caused by COVID-19. Overall, the patients' trust in and their appreciation of the work of the practice staff have increased since the pandemic. Patients stated that GP practices should continue hygiene procedures, such as wearing a mask or keeping physical distance, in the future. DISCUSSION: Despite multiple reports of a significant decline in both provision and utilization of standard care in GP practices during the pandemic, our survey showed that the majority of patients felt that they received adequate GP care and were highly satisfied. The results should be interpreted against the background of possible selection bias. CONCLUSION: In this survey, GP patients were predominantly appreciative of GP care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The patients' assessment of the provision and use of GP services during the pandemic complements the corresponding perspective of GPs and medical practice assistants.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Atención Primaria de Salud , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Alemania , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Adulto , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Grupos Focales , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud
9.
Aust J Prim Health ; 302024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38981000

RESUMEN

Background Large datasets exist in Australia that make de-identified primary healthcare data extracted from clinical information systems available for research use. This study reviews these datasets for their capacity to provide insight into chronic disease care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and the extent to which the principles of Indigenous Data Sovereignty are reflected in data collection and governance arrangements. Methods Datasets were included if they collect primary healthcare clinical information system data, collect data nationally, and capture Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. We searched PubMed and the public Internet for data providers meeting the inclusion criteria. We developed a framework to assess data providers across domains, including representativeness, usability, data quality, adherence with Indigenous Data Sovereignty and their capacity to provide insights into chronic disease. Datasets were assessed against the framework based on email interviews and publicly available information. Results We identified seven datasets. Only two datasets reported on chronic disease, collected data nationally and captured a substantial number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients. No dataset was identified that captured a significant number of both mainstream general practice clinics and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations. Conclusions It is critical that more accurate, comprehensive and culturally meaningful Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander healthcare data are collected. These improvements must be guided by the principles of Indigenous Data Sovereignty and Governance. Validated and appropriate chronic disease indicators for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples must be developed, including indicators of social and cultural determinants of health.


Asunto(s)
Aborigenas Australianos e Isleños del Estrecho de Torres , Enfermedad Crónica , Medicina General , Servicios de Salud del Indígena , Humanos , Australia , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina General/métodos , Servicios de Salud del Indígena/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 249, 2024 Jul 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38987692

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient experience is an important indicator of the quality of healthcare. Patients with multimorbidity often face adverse health outcomes and increased healthcare utilisation. General practitioners play a crucial role in managing these patients. The main aim of our study was to perform an in-depth assessment of differences in patient-reported experience with general practice between patients living with chronic conditions and multimorbidity, and those with no chronic conditions. METHODS: We performed secondary analyses of a national survey of patient experience with general practice in 2021 (response rate 41.9%, n = 7,912). We described the characteristics of all survey respondents with no, one, two, and three or more self-reported chronic conditions. We assessed patient experience using four scales from the Norwegian patient experience with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP). These scales were used as dependent variables in bivariate and multivariate analyses and for testing the measurement model, including confirmatory factor analysis and a multigroup CFA to assess measurement invariance. Sentiment and content analysis of free-text comments was also performed. RESULTS: Patients with chronic conditions consistently reported lower scores on the GP and GP practice experience scales, compared to those without chronic conditions. This pattern persisted even after adjustment for patient background variables. The strongest associations were found for the scale of "Enablement", followed by the scales of "GP" and "Practice". The subscale "Accessibility" did not correlate statistically significantly with any number of chronic conditions. The analysis of free-text comments echoed the quantitative results. Patients with multimorbidity stressed the importance of time spent on consultations, meeting the same GP, follow-up and relationship more often than patients with no chronic conditions. Our study also confirmed measurement invariance across patients with no chronic conditions and patients with multimorbidity, indicating that the observed differences in patient experience were a result of true differences, rather than artifacts of measurement bias. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the need for the healthcare system to provide customised support for patients with chronic conditions and multimorbidity. Addressing the specific needs of patients with multimorbidity is a critical step towards enhancing patient experience and the quality of care in general practice.


Asunto(s)
Medicina General , Multimorbilidad , Humanos , Noruega/epidemiología , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Anciano , Adulto , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
11.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0305164, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991043

RESUMEN

AIMS: Maintaining continuity of care between doctors and patients is considered a fundamental aspect of quality in primary healthcare. In this study, we aim to examine continuity in Norway over time by computing two commonly used indicators of continuity: the St Leonard's Index of Continuity of Care (SLICC) and the Usual Provider of Care Index (UPC). METHOD: We employ individual-level data, which covers all primary care consultations. This data includes the identities of each patient and physician, and we can identify each patient's regular general practitioner (GP). The SLICC is calculated as the share of consultations conducted by the patient's regular GP annually from 2006 to 2021. Additionally, we identify each patient's most visited physician and compute the UPC as the share of total consultations conducted by the most visited physician during the same period. Our analysis is conducted at the national level and stratified according to the level of centrality, differentiating between areas of high, moderate, and low centrality. RESULTS: Our findings reveal that, at the national level, SLICC and UPC exhibit remarkable stability, reaching 64 and 71 percent, respectively, in 2021. However, there is significant geographical variation, with the least central areas experiencing less continuous healthcare (SLICC at 49 percent in 2021) than patients residing in more central areas (SLICC at 68 in 2021). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate a high degree of continuity that has been stable over time. However, large geographical variations suggest that policymakers should strive to reduce geographical disparities in healthcare quality.


Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Medicina General , Noruega , Humanos , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud
12.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e51272, 2024 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39058543

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: NHS England encourages the use of online consultation (OC) systems alongside traditional access methods for patients to contact their general practice online and for practices to manage workflow. Access is a key driver of patients' primary care experience. The use of online technology and patient experience vary by sociodemographic characteristics. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the association between OC system use and patient experience of primary care in English general practice and how that varies by OC system model and practice sociodemographic characteristics (rurality, deprivation, age, and ethnicity). METHODS: We categorized practices as "low-use" or "high-use" according to the volume of patient-initiated contacts made via the OC system. We considered practices using one of 2 OC systems with distinct designs and implementation models-shorter "free text" input with an embedded single workflow OC system (FT practices) and longer "mixed text" input with variation in implemented workflow OC system (MT practices). We used 2022 General Practice Patient Survey data to capture 4 dimensions of patient experience-overall experience, experience of making an appointment, continuity of care, and use of self-care before making an appointment. We used logistic regression at the practice level to explore the association between OC system use and patient experience, including interaction terms to assess sociodemographic variation. RESULTS: We included 287,194 responses from 2423 MT and 170 FT practices. The proportions of patients reporting positive experiences at MT and FT practices were similar or better than practices nationally, except at high-use MT practices. At high-use MT practices, patients were 19.8% (odds ratio [OR] 0.802, 95% CI 0.782-0.823) less likely to report a good overall experience; 24.5% (OR 0.755, 95% CI 0.738-0.773) less likely to report a good experience of making an appointment; and 18.9% (OR 0.811, 95% CI 0.792-0.83) less likely to see their preferred general practitioner; but 27.8% (OR 1.278, 95% CI 1.249-1.308) more likely to use self-care, compared with low-use MT practices. Opposite trends were seen at FT practices. Sociodemographic inequalities in patient experience were generally lower at high-use than low-use practices; for example, gaps in overall experience between practices with the most and fewest White patients decreased by 2.7 percentage points at MT practices and 6.4 percentage points at FT practices. Trends suggested greater improvements in experience for traditionally underserved groups-patients from urban and deprived areas, younger patients, and non-White patients. CONCLUSIONS: An OC system with shorter free text input and an integrated single workflow can enhance patient experience and reduce sociodemographic inequalities. Variation in patient experience between practices with different sociodemographic characteristics and OC systems underscores the importance of tailored design and implementation. Generalizing results across different OC systems is difficult due to variations in how they are integrated into practice workflows and communicated to patients.


Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medicina General/métodos , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Inglaterra , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Adolescente
13.
BMJ Open ; 14(6): e080393, 2024 Jun 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844390

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) were on the front line of the COVID-19 outbreak. Identifying clinical profiles in COVID-19 might improve patient care and enable closer monitoring of at-risk profiles. OBJECTIVES: To identify COVID-19 profiles in a population of adult primary care patients, and to determine whether the profiles were associated with negative outcomes and persistent symptoms. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In a prospective multicentre study, 44 GPs from multiprofessional primary care practices in the Paris area of France recruited 340 consecutive adult patients (median age: 47 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 during the first two waves of the epidemic. METHOD AND OUTCOME: A latent class (LC) analysis with 11 indicators (clinical signs and symptoms) was performed. The resulting profiles were characterised by a 3-month composite outcome (COVID-19-related hospital admission and/or death) and persistent symptoms three and 6 months after inclusion. RESULTS: We identified six profiles: 'paucisymptomatic' (LC1, 9%), 'anosmia and/or ageusia' (LC2, 12.9%), 'influenza-like syndrome with anosmia and ageusia' (LC3, 15.5%), 'influenza-like syndrome without anosmia or ageusia' (LC4, 24.5%), 'influenza-like syndrome with respiratory impairment' (LC5) and a 'complete form' (LC6, 17.7%). At 3 months, 7.4% of the patients were hospitalised (with higher rates in LC5), and 18% had persistent symptoms (with higher rates in LC5 and LC6). At 6 months, 6.4% of the patients had persistent symptoms, with no differences between LCs. CONCLUSION: Our findings might help GPs to identify patients at risk of persistent COVID-19 symptoms and hospital admission and then set up procedures for closer monitoring.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Medicina General , Análisis de Clases Latentes , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Francia/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Paris/epidemiología , Anosmia/epidemiología , Ageusia/epidemiología
14.
Br J Gen Pract ; 74(suppl 1)2024 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38902102

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Very little is known about Gypsy, Roma, and Traveller health, or access to and utilisation of health care. They are not coded in NHS data systems and there are multiple barriers including illiteracy, digital exclusion, and discrimination. AIM: To gain rare insight into Irish Traveller patients' emergency healthcare utilisation and outcomes. METHOD: A retrospective general practice review of A&E attendances was performed from January to December 2017, comparing Travellers with the rest of the practice patient population. A search was done for all A&E attendance letters and related admissions. Blind review of the diagnosis and management were assessed by two reviewers for appropriateness of attendance at A&E. The frequency and recurrence of A&E attendances, referral pathway toA&E, location of A&E, and age distribution were compared. RESULTS: Traveller patients attending A&E were younger. There were fewer repeat attendances in the travelling community but proportionally more in the Traveller under-20-year-old cohort. Only 38% of A&E attendances in Travellers (56% non-Travellers) were deemed appropriate (χ2 7.16, P = 0.007). Only 20% of Travellers (36% non-Travellers) attending A&E were admitted to hospital (χ2 6.33, P = 0.01). Further, 93% of A&E attendances in Irish Travellers (75% non-Travellers) did not follow initial contact with either a GP or NHS 111 (χ2 9.86, P<0.002). Finally, 51% of Irish Travellers (6% non-Travellers) attended A&E departments distant to their registered GP practice (χ2 89.5, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This work throws light on health service utilisation patterns by Irish Travellers. A&E attendances may have been more suited to a non-emergency setting and there may have been missed opportunities for contact with primary care or NHS 111, which may have an impact on continuity, onward referral, and quality of care.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Medicina General , Viaje , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Irlanda , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Viaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Romaní/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar
15.
J Prim Health Care ; 16(2): 135-142, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38941245

RESUMEN

Introduction Around 5% of the people in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) are not enrolled with a general practice. Aim This study aimed to explore the utilisation of general practice by enrolment status and subsequent use of an emergency department. Methods We compared a cohort of respondents from New Zealand Health Surveys (2013/14-2018/19) on self-reported general practice utilisation and their substitutes, according to their enrolment status (enrolled and not enrolled). They were then followed up to examine their subsequent use of an emergency department. Time to an emergency department presentation was modelled with proportional hazards regression models with enrolment status as the explanatory variable. Confounding variables used were sex, age group, prioritised ethnicity, the New Zealand Deprivation Index and self-rated health. Results Those not enrolled were more likely to be young, male, Asian, more socioeconomically deprived and with better health status than those enrolled. Generally, those not enrolledutilised general practice services less. Those not enrolled who had used an emergency department were more likely to have used it as a substitute for general practice (40% vs 26%). Modelling showed that those not enrolled took longer to access an emergency department. Adjusting for confounding variables did not change that interpretation. Discussion Those not enrolled were younger and healthier and may have a perception that enrolment isn't necessary. As a group, they were more likely to be socioeconomically deprived and to use an emergency department, which is free at a public hospital in NZ, as a substitute for primary care which suggests that cost may influence their choices.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Medicina General , Humanos , Nueva Zelanda , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/etnología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Edad , Estado de Salud
16.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 154: 3425, 2024 Jun 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885527

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the context of an ageing population and increasing health needs, primary care reform is needed and several new models have emerged, including the introduction of case managers in general practitioner practices. AIM: To describe the frequency of case managers in general practices in eleven Western countries between 2012 and 2019 and to investigate the characteristics of general practitioners and their practices associated with case manager frequency. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Surveys of Primary Care Physicians, which were international cross-sectional studies conducted in 2012, 2015 and 2019. Random samples of general practitioners were selected in 11 Western countries (2012: n = 9776; 2015: n = 12,049; 2019: n = 13,200). The use of case managers in general practitioner practices was determined with the question "Does your practice use personnel, such as nurses or case managers, to monitor and manage care for patients with chronic conditions that need regular follow-up care?", with possible answers "Yes, within the practice", "Yes, outside the practice", "Yes, both within and outside the practice" or "No". Other variables characterising general practitioners and their practices were considered. Mixed-effects logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: The frequency of case managers within general practitioner practices varied greatly by country, with an overall trend towards an increase from 2012 to 2019. In the multivariate analysis, more case managers were found in practices located in small towns (odds ratio [OR] 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-1.7) and in rural areas (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.5-2.4) compared to cities. The frequency of case managers was higher in larger practices, as shown in comparisons of practices in the second, third and fourth quartile of full-time equivalent employee counts compared to those in the first quartile (Q2: OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4-1.9; Q3: OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.6-2.9; Q4: OR 3.8, 95% CI 3.0-4.9). There was no significant difference in frequency with respect to the age and sex of the general practitioners. CONCLUSION: The use of case managers in general practitioner practices is a promising approach, but its practice varies greatly. This practice has been developing in Western countries and is tending to increase. The implementation of case managers seems to be associated with certain characteristics linked to general practitioner practices (practice location, practice size), whereas it does not seem to depend on the personal characteristics of general practitioners, such as age or sex.


Asunto(s)
Gestores de Casos , Medicina General , Médicos Generales , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Gestores de Casos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano
17.
Aust J Gen Pract ; 53(6): 403-407, 2024 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38840381

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our understanding of community members' expectations and experiences of discussing alcohol use in general practice settings is limited, particularly for people with heavy alcohol use. METHOD: Qualitative interviews were conducted with people with heavy alcohol use to explore their experiences of discussing alcohol use with their general practitioner (GP). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS: Three themes were identified: (1) patient perceptions of alcohol discussions in primary care; (2) the importance of the doctor-patient relationship; and (3) consequences of unmet health needs and expectations. Patients expect their GPs to initiate conversations about alcohol use. Positive interactions are characterised by GPs' caring, non-judgemental and collaborative approach, whereas negative interactions focus on a perceived lack of knowledge or ability to manage excessive alcohol use. DISCUSSION: Alcohol harm reduction efforts should include strategies for bolstering the therapeutic relationship between GPs and their patients.


Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Medicina General , Entrevistas como Asunto , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Australia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Medicina General/métodos , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/psicología , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , Anciano , Alcoholismo/psicología , Comunicación
18.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 24(1): 155, 2024 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38840250

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis can often be recorded in electronic medical records (EMRs) as free-text or using a term with a diagnosis code. Researchers, governments, and agencies, including organisations that deliver incentivised primary care quality improvement programs, frequently utilise coded data only and often ignore free-text entries. Diagnosis data are reported for population healthcare planning including resource allocation for patient care. This study sought to determine if diagnosis counts based on coded diagnosis data only, led to under-reporting of disease prevalence and if so, to what extent for six common or important chronic diseases. METHODS: This cross-sectional data quality study used de-identified EMR data from 84 general practices in Victoria, Australia. Data represented 456,125 patients who attended one of the general practices three or more times in two years between January 2021 and December 2022. We reviewed the percentage and proportional difference between patient counts of coded diagnosis entries alone and patient counts of clinically validated free-text entries for asthma, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: Undercounts were evident in all six diagnoses when using coded diagnoses alone (2.57-36.72% undercount), of these, five were statistically significant. Overall, 26.4% of all patient diagnoses had not been coded. There was high variation between practices in recording of coded diagnoses, but coding for type 2 diabetes was well captured by most practices. CONCLUSION: In Australia clinical decision support and the reporting of aggregated patient diagnosis data to government that relies on coded diagnoses can lead to significant underreporting of diagnoses compared to counts that also incorporate clinically validated free-text diagnoses. Diagnosis underreporting can impact on population health, healthcare planning, resource allocation, and patient care. We propose the use of phenotypes derived from clinically validated text entries to enhance the accuracy of diagnosis and disease reporting. There are existing technologies and collaborations from which to build trusted mechanisms to provide greater reliability of general practice EMR data used for secondary purposes.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Medicina General , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Victoria , Enfermedad Crónica , Codificación Clínica/normas , Exactitud de los Datos , Salud Poblacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Australia , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología
19.
Eur J Gen Pract ; 30(1): 2357780, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832626

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, there are concerns about declining mental health of children and young people (CYP). OBJECTIVES: To examine trends in GP consultation rates for psychosocial problems and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We performed a population-based cohort study using electronic GP records of CYP (0-24 years) living in the Rotterdam metropolitan area between 2016 and 2021. We calculated monthly consultation rates for psychosocial problems, stratified by age group and sex. We used negative binomial models to model the pre-COVID-19 trend, and estimate expected rates post-COVID-19 onset. We modelled the effect of COVID-19 infection rate and school closure on consultation rates per sex and age group. RESULTS: The cohort increased from 64801 to 92093 CYP between January 2016 and December 2021. Median age was 12.5 years and 49.3% was female. Monthly consultation rates increased from 2,443 to 4,542 consultations per 100,000 patient months over the six years. This trend (RR 1.009, 95%CI 1.008-1.011) started well before the COVID-19 pandemic. Consultation rates of adolescent girls and young women increased most strongly. Between March and May 2020, there was a temporary reduction in consultation rates, whereupon these returned to expected levels. COVID-19 infection rate and school closures showed small but significant associations with consultation rates for psychosocial problems but this did not affect the overall trend. Although consultation rates for psychosocial problems increased, this increment was stable over the entire study period. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly increase consultation rates for psychosocial problems in CYP. The consultation rates increased, especially in adolescent girls and young women.


CYP' consultation rates for psychosocial problems within general practice almost doubled between 2016 and 2021 in the Rotterdam metropolitan area, the Netherlands.This increase was steady over time and was not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.Consultation rates in general practice for psychosocial problems increased most strongly in adolescent girls and young women.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Derivación y Consulta , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Masculino , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Preescolar , Lactante , Adulto Joven , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Recién Nacido , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos
20.
Public Health ; 233: 185-189, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38908308

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe the trends in the nature of general practices in Scotland between 2014/15 and 2023. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive ecological study. METHODS: We obtained data from Public Health Scotland and used general practitioner (GP) practice codes, practice names, and the General Medical Council (GMC) numbers of their listed GPs to describe trends in practice characteristics and to identify individual practices that were likely to be operating as a single entity. RESULTS: Defining practice entities is difficult because different GP practice codes are often retained when GPs are performing across multiple practices. If GP practice codes alone are used, the median practice list size increased from 5094 to 5881, and the mean from 5588 to 6289, between 2013/14 and 2020/21. There was one outlier practice that grew to have over 45,000 patients registered by 2020/21. However, this underestimates the extent of this new mega-practice phenomenon. Using the GMC numbers of GPs listed as performers to identify where the same GPs are working across multiple GP practice codes, we identified a series of mega-practices that span across health board areas and which have experienced a dramatic increase in their list size (with the two largest having list sizes of over 101,000 and 77,000 patients, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to better understand: how mega-practices provide services and whether this differs from other practices; where financial rewards accumulate within mega-practices; differences in staffing between mega-practices and other models; and the impacts mega-practices have on the quality and continuity of care and on health and inequality outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Medicina General , Escocia , Humanos , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA