RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Modern cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have mechanisms that prevent damage from external electric shocks, and malfunction following accidental electrocution is rare. However, the effects of lightning injuries in patients with CIEDs are uncertain. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old man with a dual-chamber pacemaker due to complete heart block was struck by a lightning while farming. He had no serious injury at the time and sought medical evaluation 1 month later, when he presented with asymptomatic bradycardia. Device interrogation suggested major battery and lead damage, requiring extraction and subsequent placement of a new pacing system. DISCUSSION: While a previous report depicted pacing threshold elevation without extensive device impairment, our patient presented with major damage to the whole pacing system. The factors contributing to these divergent outcomes are unclear. Differences in injury mechanism, pacemaker model, and the pattern of electric current dispersion within the device may each play a part in this discrepancy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The use of cardiac implantable electronic devices has increased in recent years. It has also brought some issues. Among these, the complications of cardiac implantable electronic devices infection and pocket hematoma are difficult to manage. It can be fatal with the contribution of patient-related risk factors. In this study, we aimed to find mortality rates in patients who developed cardiac implantable electronic devices infection and pocket hematoma over 5 years. We also investigated the risk factors affecting mortality in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. METHODS: A total of 288 cardiac implantable electronic devices patients were evaluated. Demographic details, history, and clinical data of all patients were recorded. Cardiac implantable electronic devices infection was defined according to the modified Duke criteria. The national registry was used to ascertain the mortality status of the patients. The patients were divided into two groups (exitus and survival groups). In addition, the pocket hematoma was defined as significant bleeding at the pocket site after cardiac implantable electronic devices placement. RESULTS: The cardiac implantable electronic devices infection was similar in both groups (p=0.919), and the pocket hematoma was higher in the exitus group (p=0.019). The exitus group had higher usage of P2Y12 inhibitors (p≤0.001) and novel oral anticoagulants (p=0.031). The Cox regression analysis, including mortality-related factors, revealed that renal failure is the most significant risk factor for mortality. Renal failure was linked to a 2.78-fold higher risk of death. CONCLUSION: No correlation was observed between cardiac implantable electronic devices infection and mortality, whereas pocket hematoma was associated with mortality. Furthermore, renal failure was the cause of the highest mortality rate in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of artificial cardiac pacemakers has grown steadily in line with the aging population. OBJECTIVES: To determine the rates of hospital readmissions and complications after pacemaker implantation or pulse generator replacement and to assess the impact of these events on annual treatment costs from the perspective of the Unified Health System (SUS). METHODS: A prospective registry, with data derived from clinical practice, collected during index hospitalization and during the first 12 months after the surgical procedure. The cost of index hospitalization, the procedure, and clinical follow-up were estimated according to the values reimbursed by SUS and analyzed at the patient level. Generalized linear models were used to study factors associated with the total annual treatment cost, adopting a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: A total of 1,223 consecutive patients underwent initial implantation (n=634) or pulse generator replacement (n=589). Seventy episodes of complication were observed in 63 patients (5.1%). The incidence of hospital readmissions within one year was 16.4% (95% CI 13.7% - 19.6%) after initial implants and 10.6% (95% CI 8.3% - 13.4%) after generator replacements. Chronic kidney disease, history of stroke, length of hospital stays, need for postoperative intensive care, complications, and hospital readmissions showed a significant impact on the total annual treatment cost. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the influence of age, comorbidities, postoperative complications, and hospital readmissions as factors associated with increased total annual treatment cost for patients with pacemakers.

FUNDAMENTO: O uso de marca-passos cardíacos artificiais tem crescido constantemente, acompanhando o envelhecimento populacional. OBJETIVOS: Determinar as taxas de readmissões hospitalares e complicações após implante de marca-passo ou troca de gerador de pulsos e avaliar o impacto desses eventos nos custos anuais do tratamento sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). MÉTODOS: Registro prospectivo, com dados derivados da prática clínica assistencial, coletados na hospitalização índice e durante os primeiros 12 meses após o procedimento cirúrgico. O custo da hospitalização índice, do procedimento e do seguimento clínico foram estimados de acordo com os valores reembolsados pelo SUS e analisados ao nível do paciente. Modelos lineares generalizados foram utilizados para estudar fatores associados ao custo total anual do tratamento, adotando-se um nível de significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: No total, 1.223 pacientes consecutivos foram submetidos a implante inicial (n= 634) ou troca do gerador de pulsos (n= 589). Foram observados 70 episódios de complicação em 63 pacientes (5,1%). A incidência de readmissões hospitalares em um ano foi de 16,4% (IC 95% 13,7% - 19,6%) após implantes iniciais e 10,6% (IC 95% 8,3% - 13,4%) após trocas de geradores. Doença renal crônica, histórico de acidente vascular encefálico, tempo de permanência hospitalar, necessidade de cuidados intensivos pós-operatórios, complicações e readmissões hospitalares mostraram um impacto significativo sobre o custo anual total do tratamento. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados confirmam a influência da idade, comorbidades, complicações pós-operatórias e readmissões hospitalares como fatores associados ao incremento do custo total anual do tratamento de pacientes com marca-passo.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk factors for predicting atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) detected by cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). METHODS: A total of 140 patients with CIED in our hospital from June 2013 to June 2018 were included and were followed up to observe whether they had AHREs. AHRE are defined as atrial rate ≥ 175 times/minute, lasting > 5 minutes, and reviewed by an experienced electrophysiologist with unclear clinical diagnosis. The patients fasted for 12 hours after implantation, and blood samples were collected for biochemical, lipid, and whole blood count detection. Follow-up was regular after discharge to record follow-up data of each patient and conduct statistical analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and forty patients were implanted with dual-chamber pacemakers, their median age was 70 years old, 44.29% were male, 27 patients had AHRE within one year, and AHRE incidence rate was 19.29%. The microcytic to hypochromic (M/H) ratio was calculated for all AHRE patients and compared with the patients without AHRE; the M/H value of AHRE patients was significantly higher. Throughout the entire follow-up period, a total of 44 patients developed AHRE; when adjusted by multivariate analysis, only M/H ratio ≥ 4.5 vs. < 4.5 had statistical significance, and the adjusted hazard ratio value was 4.313 (1.675-11.105). CONCLUSION: As an indicator, M/H ratio may play an important role in the occurrence and development of atrial fibrillation and can be used as a predictor of AHRE in patients with CIED.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

La taquicardia ventricular polimórfica se origina en los ventrículos, cuyos complejos QRS son de morfología, amplitud y dirección variable, con frecuencias que oscilan entre 200 y 250 lpm, pudiendo ser autolimitadas o degenerar en una fibrilación ventricular. La TdP es un tipo de taquicardia ventricular polimórfica caracterizada por complejos con un eje eléctrico que gira alrededor de la línea isoeléctrica y que está asociada a QT largo. Se presenta el caso de una paciente portadora de marcapaso que presenta episodios de taquicardia ventricular polimórfica, con una morfología típica de TdP, sin documentación de QT prolongado previo ni actual, generada por la estimulación ventricular sobre onda T, de forma accidental por desplazamiento del electrodo auricular a Ventrículo Derecho (VD).

Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia is a tachycardia originating in the ventricles, where the QRS complexes have variable morphology, amplitude, and direction, with frequencies ranging between 200 and 250 bpm; it may be self-limited or degenerate into ventricular fibrillation. Torsades de Pointes (TdP) is a type of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia characterized by complexes with an electrical axis that rotates around the isoelectric line and that is associated with long QT interval. We present the case of a patient with a pacemaker who presents episodes of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, with a typical morphology of TdP, without documentation of previous or current prolonged QT, generated by ventricular stimulation on the T wave, accidentally due to displacement of the atrial electrode to the Right Ventricle (RV).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Capsulectomy is recommended in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infection after transvenous lead extraction (TLE) but is time-consuming and requires extensive tissue debridement. In this study, we describe the outcomes of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) lavage in lieu of capsulectomy for the treatment of CIED infections. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent TLE for CIED-related infections in two institutions in Colombia. In the capsulectomy group, complete capsulectomy was performed after hardware removal. In the CHG group, exhaustive lavage of the generator pocket with 20 cc of CHG at 2% followed by irrigation with approximately 500 cc of normal saline (0.9% sodium chloride) was performed. The primary outcomes included reinfection and hematoma formation in the generator pocket. Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of any adverse reaction to chlorhexidine, the need for reintervention, infection-related mortality, and total procedural time. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (mean age 67.2 ± 13 years, 32.4% female) underwent CIED extraction with either total capsulectomy (n = 54) or CHG (n = 48) lavage. Hematoma formation was significantly higher in the capsulectomy group versus the CHG group (13% vs. 0%, p = .014), with no significant differences in the reinfection rate. Capsulectomy was associated with longer procedural time (133.7 ± 78.5 vs. 89.9 ± 51.8 min, p = .002). No adverse reactions to CHG were found. Four patients (4.3%) died from worsening sepsis: three in the capsulectomy group and one in the CHG group (p = .346). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CIED infections, the use of CHG without capsulectomy resulted in a lower risk of hematoma formation and shorter procedural times without an increased risk of reinfection or adverse events associated with CHG use.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCCIÓN Se ha demostrado que los marcapasos transvenosos mejoran la calidad de vida y reducen la mortalidad de los pacientes con bradicardia y bloqueos de la conducción cardíaca. Sin embargo, presentan inconvenientes inevitables, ya que tienen una incidencia relativamente alta de complicaciones relacionadas con el cable y el bolsillo del dispositivo. Por ello, los marcapasos sin cable han surgido como una solución para reducir las complicaciones observadas con los marcapasos convencionales. Sin embargo, hasta ahora, no se han publicado recomendaciones de las sociedades nacionales o internacionales para las indicaciones e implantación de los marcapasos sin cables unicamerales. OBJETIVO Desarrollar criterios de uso adecuado para la implantación de los marcapasos sin cables VR en pacientes con fibrilación auricular o en ritmo sinusal, basándonos en la revisión sistemática de la literatura y en la opinión de un grupo de expertos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO Se utilizó la metodología RAND/UCLA para la creación de los criterios de indicación del uso adecuado del marcapasos sin cables VR. Para ello, se realizó una actualización de un informe previo con una revisión de la literatura (Anexo 1) sobre la efectividad y seguridad del marcapasos sin cables en pacientes con indicación de estimulación ventricular, con el objetivo de facilitársela a los expertos. Posteriormente se elaboró una lista de indicaciones a partir de la bibliografía y de la consulta con especialistas en cardiología. Finalmente, se formó un panel de expertos compuesto por 10 expertos en la materia que puntuaron sobre la adecuación del marcapasos sin cables, haciéndolo en dos rondas de votaciones. Las puntuaciones se analizaron de acuerdo en criterios estadísticos, basados en la mediana de las puntuaciones para cada escenario y el grado de acuerdo entre panelistas. Se realizaron análisis de regresión logística multinomial para determinar el grado en que cada una de las variables analizadas individualmente influían en los juicios de adecuación. Los criterios explícitos desarrollados se resumieron mediante un análisis de árbol de clasificación y regresión. RESULTADOS En la revisión sistemática no se localizaron estudios desde 2017 que evaluaran la efectividad clínica ni la seguridad del marcapasos sin cables de forma comparada con los marcapasos convencionales. En las dos rondas se evaluaron 64 indicaciones o escenarios clínicos en el caso de fibrilación auricular y 192 para el ritmo sinusal. Los resultados obtenidos en segunda ronda para en fibrilación fueron: de los 64 escenarios evaluados el 65,6 % se clasificaron como adecuados (calificándose con acuerdo en el 71,4 %), el 23,4 % dudosos y el 11 % como inadecuados. En el caso del ritmo sinusal, de los 192 escenarios el 46,9 % fue considerado adecuado (se encontró acuerdo en el 75,6 % de los escenarios), el 31,2 % dudoso y el 21,9 % inadecuado. El grado de desacuerdo bajó respecto al obtenido en la primera ronda y solo se mostraron 3 escenarios con desacuerdo en el total de los escenarios (1,2 %). Todas las variables consideradas para la composición de los escenarios del panel en la fibrilación auricular y el ritmo sinusal mostraron una influencia estadísticamente significativa según el modelo de regresión logística. No obstante, la limitación para el acceso vascular a través de la vena cava superior fue la variable con mayor capacidad predictiva. Los árboles de clasificación creados mostraron un resumen de los resultados del panel según las variables clínicas valoradas. CONCLUSIONES La evidencia localizada en la revisión sistemática no demuestra la no inferioridad ni la superioridad de este dispositivo frente al convencional, aunque parece ventajosa frente a los dispositivos convencionales en determinadas situaciones clínicas. Se aplicó el método de consenso RAND/UCLA para desarrollar criterios de uso adecuado para la selección e implantación de marcapasos sin cables VR en pacientes con fibrilación auricular y en ritmo sinusal. De forma general, en los casos en los que se presenta una limitación importante o completa para el acceso vascular a través de la vena cava superior, la implantación del marcapasos sin cables resulta adecuada tanto en pacientes en fibrilación auricular como aquellos en ritmo sinusal, pues en estos casos la alternativa habitual es el implante quirúrgico de un electrodo epicárdico. Los criterios presentados pueden considerarse una ayuda en la toma de decisiones, a tener en cuenta junto con otra información científica y en el contexto de la relación médico-paciente individual. Las recomendaciones presentadas no reemplazan el juicio clínico del profesional, que siempre tiene en cuenta las necesidades particulares de cada situación clínica. Para facilitar la consulta de los resultados íntegros del panel de expertos, se ha diseñado una aplicación informática (disponible en https://www.aetsa.org/). Las preferencias de los pacientes con respecto al tratamiento son un aspecto importante a tener en cuenta y en el futuro es probable que se disponga de un mayor cuerpo de evidencia científica sobre los resultados en salud (mortalidad, morbilidad cardiovascular, riesgo de infección…) a corto y medio plazo del marcapasos sin cable frente al convencional en distintos escenarios clínicos, facilitando la toma de decisiones para su indicación tanto en pacientes en fibrilación auricular como aquellos que estén en ritmo sinusal.

INTRODUCTION Transvenous pacemakers have been shown to improve quality of life and reduce mortality in patients with bradycardia and cardiac conduction block. However, they have unavoidable drawbacks, as they have a relatively high incidence of complications related to the lead and the pocket of the device. Therefore, leadless pacemakers have emerged as a solution to reduce the complications seen with conventional pacemakers. However, so far, no recommendations have been published by national or international societies for indications and implantation of single-chamber leadless pacemakers. OBJECTIVE Develop appropriate use criteria for the implantation of VR leadless pacemakers in patients with atrial fibrillation or in sinus rhythm, based on systematic review of the literature and expert panel opinion. MATERIAL AND METHOD The RAND/UCLA methodology was used to create the criteria for the appropriate use of VR leadless pacing. For this purpose, an update of a previous report with a review of the literature on the effectiveness and safety of leadless pacing in patients with an indication for ventricular pacing was performed for the purpose of providing it to the experts. A list of indications was then compiled from the literature and consultation with cardiology specialists. Finally, an expert panel of 10 experts in the field was formed to score the suitability of the leadless pacemaker in two rounds of voting. The scores were analysed according to statistical criteria, based on the median score for each scenario and the degree of agreement between panellists. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the degree to which each of the individually analysed variables influenced judgements of appropriateness. The explicit criteria developed were summarised using a classification and regression tree analysis. RESULTS In the systematic review, no studies were located since 2017 that evaluated the clinical effectiveness or safety of the leadless pacemaker compared to conventional pacemakers. In the two rounds, 64 indications or clinical scenarios were evaluated for atrial fibrillation and 192 for sinus rhythm. The results obtained in the second round for atrial fibrillation were: of the 64 scenarios evaluated, 65.6 % were classified as adequate (71.4 % in agreement), 23.4 % as uncertain and 11 % as inadequate. In the case of sinus rhythm, of the 192 scenarios 46.9 % were considered adequate (agreement was found in 75.6 % of the scenarios), 31.2 % doubtful and 21.9 % inadequate. The degree of disagreement was lower than in the first round, with only 3 scenarios showing disagreement in the total number of scenarios (1.2%). All variables considered for the composition of the panel scenarios in atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm showed a statistically significant influence according to the logistic regression model. However, limitation for vascular access through the superior vena cava was the variable with the highest predictive ability. The classification trees created showed a summary of the panel results according to the clinical variables assessed. CONCLUSIONS The evidence located in the systematic review does not demonstrate the non-inferiority or superiority of this device over the conventional device, although it seems advantageous over conventional devices in certain clinical situations. The RAND/UCLA consensus method was applied to develop appropriate use criteria for the selection and implantation of VR leadless pacemakers in patients with atrial fibrillation and in sinus rhythm. In general, in cases where there is significant or complete limitation of vascular access through the superior vena cava, leadless pacing is appropriate in both patients in atrial fibrillation and those in sinus rhythm, where the usual alternative is surgical implantation of an epicardial lead. The criteria presented can be considered as a decision aid, to be considered in conjunction with other scientific information and in the context of the individual patient-physician relationship. The recommendations presented do not replace the clinical judgement of the practitioner, which always takes into account the particular needs of each clinical situation. To facilitate consultation of the full results of the panel of experts, a computer application has been designed (available at https://www.aetsa.org/). Patient preferences regarding treatment are an important aspect to be taken into account and in the future it is likely that a greater body of scientific evidence will be available on health outcomes (mortality, cardiovascular morbidity, risk of infection…) in the short and medium term of leadless versus conventional pacing in different clinical scenarios, facilitating decision making for its indication in both patients in atrial fibrillation and those in sinus rhythm.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances (CD) are the most frequent complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and there continues to be a lack of consensus on their management. OBJECTIVE: To assess new CD and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after TAVR and to evaluate the ventricular pacing percentage (VP) up to 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: Patients who underwent TAVR from October 2014 to November 2019 were enrolled; patients with previous PPM were excluded. Clinical, procedure, ECG, and PPM data were collected up to 1 year after implantation. The significance level adopted in the statistical analysis was 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 340 patients underwent TAVR. The most frequent CD was the new left bundle branch block (LBBB; 32.2%), which 56% resolved after 6 months. Right bundle branch block (RBBB) was the biggest risk factor for advanced atrioventricular block (AVB) [OR=8.46; p<0.001] and PPM implantation [OR=5.18, p<0.001], followed by previous low-grade AVB [OR=2.25; p=0.016 for PPM implantation]. Regarding procedure characteristics, newer generation valves and valve-in-valve procedures were associated with fewer CDs. Overall, 18.5% of patients had a PPM implanted post-TAVR. At first PPM evaluation, patients with advanced AVB had a median percentage of VP of 80% and 83% at one year. Regarding patients with LBBB plus low-grade AVB, median VP was lower (6% at first assessment, p=0.036; 2% at one year, p = 0.065). CONCLUSION: LBBB was the most frequent CD after TAVR, with more than half being resolved in the first six months. RBBB was the major risk factor for advanced AVB and PPM implantation. Advanced AVB was associated with a higher percentage of VP at 1 year of follow-up.

FUNDAMENTO: Os distúrbios de condução (DC) são a complicação mais frequente após a substituição da válvula aórtica transcateter (TAVR) e ainda não há consenso sobre seu tratamento. OBJETIVO: Avaliar novos DC e implante de marca-passo definitivo (MPD) após a TAVR e avaliar a porcentagem de estimulação ventricular (EV) até 1 ano de acompanhamento. MÉTODOS: Pacientes submetidos a TAVR de outubro de 2014 a novembro de 2019 foram cadastrados; pacientes com MPD anterior foram excluídos. Dados clínicos, do procedimento, do ECG e do MPD foram coletados até 1 ano após o implante. O nível de significância adotado para a análise estatística foi 0,05%. RESULTADOS: Um total de 340 indivíduos foram submetidos a TAVR. O DC mais comum foi bloqueio de ramo esquerdo novo (BRE; 32,2%), sendo que 56% destes foram resolvidos após 6 meses. O bloqueio do ramo direito (BRD) foi o maior fator de risco para bloqueio atrioventricular avançado (BAV) [RC=8,46; p<0,001] e implante de MPD [RC=5,18; p<0,001], seguido de BAV de baixo grau prévio [RC=2,25; p=0,016 para implante de MPD]. Em relação às características do procedimento, válvulas de gerações mais recentes e procedimentos de válvula-em-válvula foram associados a menos DC. No total, 18,5% dos pacientes tiveram MPD implantado após a TAVR. Na primeira avaliação do MPD, pacientes com BAV avançado tinham uma porcentagem mediana de EV de 80%, e, após um ano, de 83%. Em relação aos pacientes com BRE e BAV de baixo grau, a EV mediana foi mais baixa (6% na primeira avaliação, p=0,036; 2% após um ano, p = 0,065). CONCLUSÃO: O BRE foi o DC mais frequente após a TAVR, com mais da metade dos casos se resolvendo nos primeiros 6 meses. O BRD foi o principal fator de risco para BAV avançado e implante de MPD. O BAV avançado foi associado a uma porcentagem mais alta de EV no acompanhamento de 1 ano.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of complications associated with the use of temporary pacemakers in patients in the waiting list for the definitive pacemaker implantation in a public hospital located in São Paulo, SP, Brazil. METHODS: Retrospective observational study based on data extracted from medical records of patients admitted to Hospital Municipal Dr. Moyses Deutsch, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein from January 2014 to December 2018. Patients aged 18 years or older, diagnosed with high degree atrioventricular block upon admission and with indications for definitive pacemaker implantation were included. All-cause mortality, clinical and surgical complications and length of hospital stay while waiting for the procedure were defined as primary outcomes. RESULTS: The sample comprised 66 patient allocated to one of two groups: with and without the need of temporary pacemaker while in hospital (n=45 and n=21, respectively). The rate of complications was higher in patients who used a temporary pacemaker (p<0.001). These included primarily pneumonia (p=0.048) and length of hospital stay (p=0.029). CONCLUSION: Patients who required a temporary pacemaker stayed longer in hospital. Longer hospital stay is associated with higher rates of general complications and all-cause mortality.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We present the case of a 75-year-old male with history of 5 months of right submaxillary tumor, with no clear etiology, who consulted for episodes of syncope preceded by dyspnea and sudden onset of profuse sweating. During his stay at the hospital, electrocardiographic records showed more than 3-second-long pauses after head movements, with a sensation of imminent loss of consciousness associated. A temporary pacemaker was required. Biopsy showed a diffuse non-germinal large B-cell B lymphoma, which required chemotherapy. After the first chemotherapy session, a significant reduction of the tumoral mass was observed, with abolition of the symptoms associated to cervical movements. The definitive diagnosis was malignant carotid sinus syndrome associated with cervical lymphoma.

Se describe el caso de un varón de 75 años con tumoración submaxilar derecha de 5 meses de evolución sin diagnóstico etiológico, que consultó por episodios de síncope precedidos por disnea y sudoración profusa de instalación súbita. Durante su internación se detectaron, en el monitoreo electrocardiográfico, pausas mayores a 3 segundos luego de la lateralización cervical reproduciendo los síntomas mencionados y asociadas a sensación de pérdida inminente de la conciencia, por lo que se implantó marcapasos transitorio. Se realizó biopsia de la masa tumoral cervical, consistente con linfoma B difuso de células grandes no centrogerminal, y se inició quimioterapia. Luego de dicho tratamiento quimioterápico se observó reducción significativa de la masa tumoral con abolición de los síntomas asociados a las maniobras cervicales. El diagnóstico definitivo fue síndrome del seno carotídeo maligno asociado a linfoma cervical.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the probability of increased total mortality risk in patients receiving a cardiac pacemaker following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: A recent publication of a nationwide Swedish, population-based cohort study found no statistically significant difference for all-cause mortality. It is unknown if a Bayesian reanalysis would provide additional insights and lead to the same conclusion. METHODS: A digitalized approach to the published Kaplan - Meier curves was used to reconstruct the individual patient dataset. Bayesian survival analyses of this data using both vague, thereby allowing the posterior probability to be completely dominated by the observed data, as well as skeptical and informative priors, based on the mortality risk of pacemaker implantation following surgical aortic valve replacement, were performed. RESULTS: The individual patient data set was reliably reconstructed and showed a 4 year follow-up hazard ratio (HR) = 1.08, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.85-1.36. The Bayesian analysis using a vague prior revealed a 74.9% probability of increased mortality in the pacemaker group. Using a skeptical, semi-informative, and fully informative priors, the posterior probabilities of increased mortality following pacemaker insertion was increased to 68.9%, 93.9% and 98.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This Bayesian reanalysis suggests a moderate to high probability of an increased total mortality in TAVR patients requiring post procedural pacemaker implantation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Resumo Fundamento: Nas últimas décadas, o número de dispositivos eletrônicos cardíacos implantáveis (DCEI) aumentou consideravelmente, assim como a necessidade de remoção destes. Neste contexto, a remoção percutânea apresenta-se como uma técnica segura e capaz de evitar uma cirurgia cardíaca convencional. Objetivos: Primário: descrever a taxa de sucesso e complicações da remoção percutânea de DCEI em um hospital público brasileiro. Secundário: estabelecer preditores de sucesso e complicações. Métodos: Serie de casos retrospectiva de todos os pacientes submetidos à remoção de DCEI em um hospital público brasileiro no período de janeiro de 2013 a junho de 2018. Remoção, explante e extração de eletrodos, complicações e desfechos foram definidos conforme a diretriz norte-americana de 2017. Variáveis categóricas foram comparadas pelos testes Qui-quadrado ou Fisher, enquanto variáveis contínuas, por testes não pareados. O nível de significância adotado nas análises estatísticas foi de 5%. Resultados: 61 pacientes foram submetidos à remoção de DCEI, sendo 51 extrações e 10 explantes. No total, 128 eletrodos foram removidos. Taxa de sucesso clínico foi 100% no grupo do explante e 90,2% no da extração (p=0,58). Complicações maiores foram encontradas em 6,6% dos pacientes. Falha do procedimento foi associada a eletrodos de ventrículo (p=0,05) e átrio (p=0,04) direito implantados há mais tempo. Duração do procedimento (p=0,003) e necessidade de transfusão sanguínea (p<0,001) foram associadas a maior índice de complicação. Conclusão: As taxas de complicação e sucesso clínico observadas foram de 11,5% e 91,8%, respectivamente. Remoções de eletrodos atriais e ventriculares mais antigos estiveram associados a menores taxa de sucesso. Procedimentos mais longos e necessidade de transfusão sanguínea foram associados a complicações.

Abstract Background: In the last decade, the number of cardiac electronic devices has risen considerably and consequently the occasional need for their removal. Concurrently, the transvenous lead removal became a safe procedure that could prevent open-heart surgery. Objective: The primary objective of this study was to describe the successful performance and the complication rates of pacemaker removals in a Brazilian public hospital. Our secondary aim was to describe the variables associated to successes and complications. Methods: A retrospective case series was conducted in patients submitted to pacemaker removal in a Brazilian public hospital from January 2013 to June 2018. Removal, explant, extraction, success and complication rates were defined by the 2017 Heart Rhythm Society Guideline. Categorical variables were compared using x2 or Fisher's tests, while continuous variables were compared by unpaired tests. A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Cardiac device removals were performed in 61 patients, of which 51 were submitted to lead extractions and 10 to lead explants. In total, 128 leads were removed. Our clinical success rate was 100% in the explant group and 90.2% in the extraction one (p=0.58). Major complications were observed in 6.6% patients. Procedure failure was associated to older right ventricle (p=0.05) and atrial leads (p=0,04). Procedure duration (p=0.003) and need for blood transfusion (p<0,001) were associated to more complications. Conclusion: Complications and clinical success were observed in 11.5% and 91.8% of the population, respectively. Removal of older atrial and ventricular leads were associated with lower success rates. Longer procedures and blood transfusions were associated with complications.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Dual-chamber pacemaker is a fully automatic pacemaker with the function of simulating human physiological pacing. It regulates pacing by programming different refractory periods and various special functions, which are closely related to arrhythmia. After in-depth understanding of these special functions, regular electrocardiogram follow-up analysis is required to provide individualized optimal program control and so is appropriate the administration of the pacemaker's special functions to better provide optimal clinical guidance for patients with arrhythmia.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract Dual-chamber pacemaker is a fully automatic pacemaker with the function of simulating human physiological pacing. It regulates pacing by programming different refractory periods and various special functions, which are closely related to arrhythmia. After in-depth understanding of these special functions, regular electrocardiogram follow-up analysis is required to provide individualized optimal program control and so is appropriate the administration of the pacemaker's special functions to better provide optimal clinical guidance for patients with arrhythmia.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, the number of cardiac electronic devices has risen considerably and consequently the occasional need for their removal. Concurrently, the transvenous lead removal became a safe procedure that could prevent open-heart surgery. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to describe the successful performance and the complication rates of pacemaker removals in a Brazilian public hospital. Our secondary aim was to describe the variables associated to successes and complications. METHODS: A retrospective case series was conducted in patients submitted to pacemaker removal in a Brazilian public hospital from January 2013 to June 2018. Removal, explant, extraction, success and complication rates were defined by the 2017 Heart Rhythm Society Guideline. Categorical variables were compared using x2 or Fisher's tests, while continuous variables were compared by unpaired tests. A p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Cardiac device removals were performed in 61 patients, of which 51 were submitted to lead extractions and 10 to lead explants. In total, 128 leads were removed. Our clinical success rate was 100% in the explant group and 90.2% in the extraction one (p=0.58). Major complications were observed in 6.6% patients. Procedure failure was associated to older right ventricle (p=0.05) and atrial leads (p=0,04). Procedure duration (p=0.003) and need for blood transfusion (p<0,001) were associated to more complications. CONCLUSION: Complications and clinical success were observed in 11.5% and 91.8% of the population, respectively. Removal of older atrial and ventricular leads were associated with lower success rates. Longer procedures and blood transfusions were associated with complications.

FUNDAMENTO: Nas últimas décadas, o número de dispositivos eletrônicos cardíacos implantáveis (DCEI) aumentou consideravelmente, assim como a necessidade de remoção destes. Neste contexto, a remoção percutânea apresenta-se como uma técnica segura e capaz de evitar uma cirurgia cardíaca convencional. OBJETIVOS: Primário: descrever a taxa de sucesso e complicações da remoção percutânea de DCEI em um hospital público brasileiro. Secundário: estabelecer preditores de sucesso e complicações. MÉTODOS: Serie de casos retrospectiva de todos os pacientes submetidos à remoção de DCEI em um hospital público brasileiro no período de janeiro de 2013 a junho de 2018. Remoção, explante e extração de eletrodos, complicações e desfechos foram definidos conforme a diretriz norte-americana de 2017. Variáveis categóricas foram comparadas pelos testes Qui-quadrado ou Fisher, enquanto variáveis contínuas, por testes não pareados. O nível de significância adotado nas análises estatísticas foi de 5%. RESULTADOS: 61 pacientes foram submetidos à remoção de DCEI, sendo 51 extrações e 10 explantes. No total, 128 eletrodos foram removidos. Taxa de sucesso clínico foi 100% no grupo do explante e 90,2% no da extração (p=0,58). Complicações maiores foram encontradas em 6,6% dos pacientes. Falha do procedimento foi associada a eletrodos de ventrículo (p=0,05) e átrio (p=0,04) direito implantados há mais tempo. Duração do procedimento (p=0,003) e necessidade de transfusão sanguínea (p<0,001) foram associadas a maior índice de complicação. CONCLUSÃO: As taxas de complicação e sucesso clínico observadas foram de 11,5% e 91,8%, respectivamente. Remoções de eletrodos atriais e ventriculares mais antigos estiveram associados a menores taxa de sucesso. Procedimentos mais longos e necessidade de transfusão sanguínea foram associados a complicações.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Resumo Fundamento Remoção de cabos-eletrodos de dispositivos cardíacos eletrônicos implantáveis (DCEI) é procedimento pouco frequente e sua realização exige longo treinamento profissional e infraestrutura adequada. Objetivos Avaliar a efetividade e a segurança da remoção de cabos-eletrodos de DCEI e determinar fatores de risco para complicações cirúrgicas e mortalidade em 30 dias. Métodos Estudo prospectivo com dados derivados da prática clínica. De janeiro/2014 a abril/2020, foram incluídos, consecutivamente, 365 pacientes submetidos à remoção de cabos-eletrodos, independentemente da indicação e técnica cirúrgica utilizada. Os desfechos primários foram: taxa de sucesso do procedimento, taxa combinada de complicações maiores e morte intraoperatória. Os desfechos secundários foram: fatores de risco para complicações intraoperatórias maiores e morte em 30 dias. Empregou-se análise univariada e multivariada, com nível de significância de 5%. Resultados A taxa de sucesso do procedimento foi de 96,7%, sendo 90,1% de sucesso completo e 6,6% de sucesso clínico. Complicações maiores intraoperatórias ocorreram em 15 (4,1%) pacientes. Fatores preditores de complicações maiores foram: tempo de implante dos cabos-eletrodos ≥ 7 anos (OR= 3,78, p= 0,046) e mudança de estratégia cirúrgica (OR= 5,30, p= 0,023). Classe funcional III-IV (OR= 6,98, p<0,001), insuficiência renal (OR= 5,75, p=0,001), infecção no DCEI (OR= 13,30, p<0,001), número de procedimentos realizados (OR= 77,32, p<0,001) e complicações maiores intraoperatórias (OR= 38,84, p<0,001) foram fatores preditores para mortalidade em 30 dias. Conclusões Os resultados desse estudo, que é o maior registro prospectivo de remoção de cabos-eletrodos da América Latina, confirmam a segurança e a efetividade desse procedimento no cenário da prática clínica real. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115(6):1114-1124)

Abstract Background Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is an uncommon procedure and requires specialized personnel and adequate facilities. Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the removal of CIED leads and to determine risk factors for surgical complications and mortality in 30 days. Methods Prospective study with data derived from clinical practice. From January 2014 to April 2020, we included 365 consecutive patients who underwent TLE, regardless of the indication and surgical technique used. The primary outcomes were: success rate of the procedure, combined rate of major complications and intraoperative death. Secondary outcomes were: risk factors for major intraoperative complications and death within 30 days. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used, with a significance level of 5%. Results Procedure success rate was 96.7%, with 90.1% of complete success and 6.6% of clinical success. Major intraoperative complications occurred in 15 (4.1%) patients. Predictors of major complications were: lead dwelling time ≥ 7 years (OR = 3.78, p = 0.046) and change in surgical strategy (OR = 5.30, p = 0.023). Functional class III-IV (OR = 6.98, p <0.001), renal failure (OR = 5.75, p = 0.001), CIED infection (OR = 13.30, p <0.001), number of procedures performed (OR = 77.32, p <0.001) and major intraoperative complications (OR = 38.84, p <0.001) were predictors of 30-day mortality. Conclusions The results of this study, which is the largest prospective registry of consecutive TLE procedures in Latin America, confirm the safety and effectiveness of this procedure in the context of real clinical practice. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 115(6):1114-1124)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)