Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To understand the evaluation and management of patients coded with lupus in the broad clinical community in the United States. METHODS: Claims data for diagnoses, procedures, medications, and physician specialties were evaluated for three lupus cohorts [lupus nephritis (LN), systemic lupus erythematosus excluding LN (SLE), and cutaneous lupus erythematosus excluding SLE and LN (CLE)] using the EVERSANA claims databases. Identification of patients was based upon the occurrence of lupus-specific codes, with the requirement that a single patient receive a lupus-related ICD code twice within a six-month period. RESULTS: Using ICD codes, we were able to identify 28,372 patients coded with LN, 82,744 patients coded with SLE, and 13,920 patients coded with CLE, and subsequently evaluate the journey of patients in each group in the year before and after being coded as having a diagnosis of lupus. For the three lupus cohorts, the basis of diagnosis was not always apparent, as clinical features of lupus were not often obtained, autoantibody testing was not usual, biopsies were uncommon and subspecialty involvement was not routine. In addition, a significant increase in laboratory testing, non-lupus diagnoses, emergency department visits and cost during the year before receiving a lupus code suggested uncertainty in disease recognition. Nevertheless, these patients received two separate lupus coding events within a six-month period, supporting a sustained or repeated diagnosis of lupus by the evaluating clinicians. When compared, the three lupus cohorts differed with regard to frequency of laboratory testing, subspecialty care, skin and renal biopsies, and medication management. Moreover, there was an increase in the cost of care of patients coded with lupus compared to a reference patient population both during the year before and after being coded with a diagnosis of lupus. CONCLUSION: The data present a comprehensive report of the care of patients coded as having a diagnosis of lupus in the United States, including those outside of specialty centers. Despite the unclear basis of diagnosis in some patients, evaluation and management of patients coded as having a diagnosis of lupus in the general care community does not closely follow the recommended guidelines set forth by professional societies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

TEN like Lupus erythematosus is an uncommon life-threatening variant of Lupus erythematosus. It is usually associated with flares of systemic lupus erythematosus and also because of widespread skin erosions, it can cause acute skin failure. It is often confused with drug induced TEN, however the management of both the diseases is different and hence correct diagnosis becomes crucial. In this study we aimed to assess the clinical characteristics and outcome of TEN like LE in the Indian population. All patients satisfying ACR/EULAR 2019 criteria for SLE and clinically diagnosed with TEN like LE were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 6 patients were identified. All patients were female. Except 1 patient who presented de-novo, the others had pre-existing symptoms of connective tissue disease. Half of the patients had palmoplantar involvement. Mucosal involvement was only mild. Majority had systemic involvement in the form of nephritis followed by arthralgia, autoimmune hepatitis and autoimmune hemolytic anemia.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The genesis of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is multifactorial and includes idiopathic, drug-related and paraneoplastic etiologies. This article reports the case of a 70-year-old female patient with paraneoplastic SCLE in whom a lung adenocarcinoma was detected during the extended examination. A paraneoplastic SCLE should be considered when a patient with SCLE presents with lesions in regions of the skin not exposed to sunlight and beginning B symptoms.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Antimalarials (AMs), particularly hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ), are the cornerstone of the treatment for both systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). HCQ and CQ are recommended as first-line oral agents in all CLE guidelines. Initially thought to have potential therapeutic effects against COVID-19, HCQ has drawn significant attention in recent years, highlighting concerns over its potential toxicity among patients and physicians. This review aims to consolidate current evidence on the efficacy of AMs in CLE. Our focus will be on optimizing therapeutic strategies, such as switching from HCQ to CQ, adding quinacrine to either HCQ or CQ, or adjusting HCQ dose based on blood concentration. Additionally, we will explore the potential for HCQ dose reduction or discontinuation in cases of CLE or SLE remission. Our review will focus on the existing evidence regarding adverse events linked to AM usage, with a specific emphasis on severe events and those of particular interest to dermatologists. Last, we will discuss the optimal HCQ dose and the balance between preventing CLE or SLE flares and minimizing toxicity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) comprises dermatologic manifestations that may occur independently or with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Despite advancements in refining CLE classification, establishing precise subtype criteria remains challenging due to overlapping presentations and difficulty in distinguishing morphology. Current treatments encompass preventive measures, topical therapies, and systemic approaches. Hydroxychloroquine and glucocorticoids are the sole US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for CLE, with numerous off-label treatments available. However, these treatments are often not covered by insurance, imposing a significant financial burden on patients. The exclusion of most CLE patients, particularly those without concurrent SLE, from trials designed for SLE has resulted in a lack of targeted treatments for CLE. To develop effective CLE treatments, validated outcome measures for tracking patient responsiveness are essential. The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index is widely utilized for its reliability, validity, and ability to differentiate between skin activity and damage. In contrast, the FDA mandates the use of the Investigator's Global Assessment, a five-point Likert scale related to lesion characteristics, for skin-related therapeutic trials. It requires the disease to resolve or almost completely resolve to demonstrate improvement, which can be difficult when there is residual erythema or incomplete clearance that is meaningfully improved from a patient perspective. Various classes of skin lupus medications target diverse pathways, allowing tailored treatment based on the patient's lupus inflammatory profile, resulting in improved outcomes. Promising targeted therapeutic drugs include anifrolumab (anti-type 1 interferon), deucravacitinib (allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor), litifilimab (plasmacytoid dendritic cell-directed therapy), iberdomide (cereblon-targeting ligand), and belimumab (B-cell directed therapy). Despite the significant impact of CLE on quality of life, therapeutic options remain inadequate. While promising treatments for cutaneous lupus are emerging, it is crucial to underscore the urgency for skin-focused treatment outcomes and the implementation of validated measures to assess therapeutic effectiveness in clinical trials.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The 5th International Conference of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus was held in Tokyo, Japan on May 9 and 10, 2023. The latest topics on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, and scleroderma (systemic sclerosis, morphea) were presented by experts in each field and new developments discussed. In these rheumatic skin diseases, many clinical trials of novel therapies targeting cytokines, signaling molecules, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, B cells, and other molecules are currently underway, and standardization of outcome assessment was discussed. In addition, the selection of the therapeutic agents available for the diversity of each case is becoming more important, together with the ongoing pathophysiological analysis of the diseases. The achievements of this conference will further promote the development of clinical practice and research in rheumatic skin diseases through international exchange among researchers. We hope that by reporting a summary of the conference in this manuscript, we can share its contents with readers.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neonatal lupus erythematosus (NLE) is an acquired autoimmune disease. NLE with liver function damage and cytomegalovirus colonization is rarely reported. METHODS: This case describes a newborn male's laboratory testing found sustained liver function damage when he came to see the doctor due to oral candidiasis. The cause was identified through clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, auxiliary examinations, and family history of the patient. RESULTS: The final diagnosis of the child was NLE with liver function damage and cytomegalovirus colonization according to comprehensive analysis and follow-up observation. CONCLUSIONS: NLE and cytomegalovirus colonization can both lead to liver function damage. When the organ function of newborns is abnormal, it is necessary to promptly investigate the cause and determine whether it is NLE.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) may present as an isolated entity or be classified as Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by the presence of laboratory abnormalities, including cytopenia, low complement levels, and/or autoantibodies (CLE with laboratory SLE). OBJECTIVE: To compare isolated CLE and CLE with laboratory SLE and to validate an existing 3-item score with age < 25 years (1 point), phototypes V to VI (1 point), antinuclear antibodies ≥ 1:320 (5 points) to predict the risk of progression from CLE to severe SLE (sSLE). METHODS: Monocentric cohort study including consecutive patients with CLE. CLE with laboratory SLE was defined by 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for SLE score of ≥10 points at baseline with CLE as the sole clinical feature. RESULTS: Of the 149 patients with CLE, 20 had CLE with laboratory SLE. The median follow-up duration was 11.3 years (IQR: 5.1-20.5). Ten patients (7%) had sSLE developed. In survival analysis, the risk of progression to sSLE was higher among CLE with laboratory SLE (hazard ratio = 6.69; 95% CI: 1.93-23.14, P < .001) compared to isolated CLE. In both groups, none of the patients with a risk score ≤ 2 had sSLE developed. LIMITATIONS: Monocentric study with a limited number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: CLE with laboratory patients with SLE have a higher risk of progression to sSLE than isolated CLE.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Tissue transcriptomics is used to uncover molecular dysregulations underlying diseases. However, the majority of transcriptomics studies focus on single diseases with limited relevance for understanding the molecular relationship between diseases or for identifying disease-specific markers. In this study, we used a normalization approach to compare gene expression across nine inflammatory skin diseases. The normalized datasets were found to retain differential expression signals that allowed unsupervised disease clustering and identification of disease-specific gene signatures. Using the NS-Forest algorithm, we identified a minimal set of biomarkers and validated their use as diagnostic disease classifier. Among them, PTEN was identified as being a specific marker for cutaneous lupus erythematosus and found to be strongly expressed by lesional keratinocytes in association with pathogenic type I IFNs. In fact, PTEN facilitated the expression of IFN-ß and IFN-κ in keratinocytes by promoting activation and nuclear translocation of IRF3. Thus, cross-comparison of tissue transcriptomics is a valid strategy to establish a molecular disease classification and to identify pathogenic disease biomarkers.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study aims to analyze the clinical characteristics and risk factors of high-risk groups of neonatal lupus erythematosus (NLE) in term infants. High-risk groups of NLE infants whose mothers were positive for anti-SSA, anti-SSB or anti-U1RNP antibodies during pregnancy were enrolled. They were born between February 2013 and February 2020, with a gestational age not less than 37 weeks. We analyzed their clinical data from birth to 24 months after birth. A total of 105 patients in the NLE high-risk group were included. Among them, 30 patients were diagnosed with NLE (NLE group), and 75 patients were not (non-NLE group). The affected systems of the NLE group included the dermal (13.3%), hepatic (76.0%), and hematological systems (43.3%). Hepatic involvement, anemia and thrombocytopenia did not emerge until 60 days, 41 days and 22 days after birth, respectively, in some cases. Systemic involvement could be cured within 3 to 12 months after birth. The clearance time of specific autoantibodies was 12 months after birth. There was no significant difference in the clinical characteristics of babies and their mothers between the two groups, neither in the positive rate nor in the clearance time of specific autoantibodies. CONCLUSION: After standardized prenatal health care, there is still a high risk of dermal, hepatic, or hematological system involvement for high-risk groups of NLE. There are no specific indicators for the prediction of whether babies will develop NLE. All of these patients need to be followed up closely within one year after birth. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Neonatal lupus erythematosus (NLEs) can affect the cardiac, dermal, hepatic, and hematological systems of infants. WHAT IS NEW: • After standardized prenatal health care employing good multidepartment cooperation in our center, no neonates had cardiac block in this study. However, dermal, hepatic, and hematological system involvement of NLE can still gradually appear (as long as 60 days after birth in some cases) during follow-up, and some of these conditions are serious and require timely and active intervention. No single factor has been found to predict whether offspring at high-risk of NLE whose mothers are positive for anti-SSA, SSB and/or RNP will develop NLE.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)