RESUMEN
Nocardia pyomyositis in immunocompetent patients is a rare occurrence. The diagnosis may be missed or delayed with the risk of progressive infection and suboptimal or inappropriate treatment. We present the case of a 48-year-old immunocompetent firefighter diagnosed with pyomyositis caused by Nocardia brasiliensis acquired by direct skin inoculation from gardening activity. The patient developed a painful swelling on his right forearm that rapidly progressed proximally and deeper into the underlying muscle layer. Ultrasound imaging of his right forearm showed a 7-mm subcutaneous fluid collection with surrounding edema. Microbiologic analysis of the draining pus was confirmed to be N brasiliensis by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight (MALDI-TOF) Mass Spectrometry. After incision and drainage deep to the muscle layer to evacuate the abscess and a few ineffective antibiotic options, the patient was treated with intravenous ceftriaxone and oral linezolid for 6 weeks. He was then de-escalated to oral moxifloxacin for an additional 4 months to complete a total antibiotic treatment duration of 6 months. The wound healed satisfactorily and was completely closed by the fourth month of antibiotic therapy. Six months after discontinuation of antibiotics, the patient continued to do well with complete resolution of the infection. In this article, we discussed the risk factors for Nocardia in immunocompetent settings, the occupational risks for Nocardia in our index patient, and the challenges encountered with diagnosis and treatment. Nocardia should be included in the differential diagnosis of cutaneous infections, particularly if there is no improvement of "cellulitis" with traditional antimicrobial regimens and the infection extends into the deeper muscle tissues.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Jardinería , Inmunocompetencia , Nocardiosis , Nocardia , Piomiositis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nocardiosis/diagnóstico , Nocardiosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Nocardia/aislamiento & purificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Piomiositis/tratamiento farmacológico , Piomiositis/diagnóstico , Piomiositis/microbiología , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Espectrometría de Masa por Láser de Matriz Asistida de Ionización Desorción , Drenaje , Moxifloxacino/uso terapéutico , Moxifloxacino/administración & dosificación , Linezolid/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a prominent cause of morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Due to the increase in Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, it is important to consider other more effective and safer alternatives compared to vancomycin. This motivates evaluating whether the use of an apparently more expensive drug such as linezolid can be cost-effective in Colombia. METHODS: A decision tree was used to simulate the results in terms of the cost and proportion of cured patients. In the simulation, patients can receive antibiotic treatment with linezolid (LZD 600 mg IV/12 h) or vancomycin (VCM 15 mg/kg iv/12 h) for 7 days, patients they can experience events adverse (renal failure and thrombocytopenia). The model was analyzed probabilistically, and a value of information analysis was conducted to inform the value of conducting further research to reduce current uncertainties in the evidence base. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) value of US$5180. RESULTS: The mean incremental cost of LZD versus VCM is US$-517. This suggests that LZD is less costly. The proportion of patients cured when treated with LZD compared with VCM is 53 vs. 43%, respectively. The mean incremental benefit of LZD versus VCM is 10 This position of absolute dominance (LZD has lower costs and higher proportion of clinical cure than no supplementation) is unnecessary to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. There is uncertainty with a 0.999 probability that LZD is more cost-effective than VCM. Our base-case results were robust to variations in all assumptions and parameters. CONCLUSION: LNZ is a cost-effective strategy for patients, ≥ 18 years of age, with VAP in Colombia- Our study provides evidence that can be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Neumonía Estafilocócica , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Humanos , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , Linezolid/farmacología , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Colombia , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacologíaRESUMEN
First antibiotic in the oxazolidinone class, linezolid fights gram-positive multiresistant bacteria by inhibiting protein synthesis through its interaction with the 50S subunit of the functional bacterial ribosome. For its antimicrobial action, it is necessary that its chiral carbon located in the oxazolidinone ring is in the S-conformation. Computational calculation at time-dependent density functional theory methodology, ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis), and electronic circular dichroism spectra was obtained for noncomplexed and complexed forms of linezolid to verify the possible chirality of nitrogen atom in the acetamide group of the molecule. The molecular system has two chiral centers. So, there are now four possible configurations: RR, RS, SR, and SS. For a better understanding of the system, the electronic spectra at the PBE0/6-311++G(3df,2p) level of theory were obtained. The complexed form was obtained from the crystallographic data of the ribosome, containing the S-linezolid molecular system. The computational results obtained for the electronic properties are in good agreement with the experimental crystallographic data and available theoretical results.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Oxazolidinonas , Linezolid/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/química , Haloarcula marismortui/química , Dominio Catalítico , Estereoisomerismo , Oxazolidinonas/farmacología , Oxazolidinonas/química , Bacterias , Modelos Teóricos , Subunidades RibosómicasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin for the treatment of nosocomial infections in children under 12 years old. DATA SOURCES: This is a systematic review in which five randomized clinical trials about the effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin, involving a total of 429 children with nosocomial infections, were evaluated. They were searched in scientific databases: PubMed, Bvs, and SciELO. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: The main nosocomial infections that affected children were bacteremia, skin, and soft tissue infections followed by nosocomial pneumonia. Most infections were caused by Gram-positive bacteria, which all studies showed infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus, with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci strains being isolated. Both linezolid and vancomycin showed high therapeutic efficacy against different types of nosocomial infections, ranging from 84.4% to 94% for linezolid and 76.9% to 90% for vancomycin. Patients receiving linezolid had lower rates of rash and red man syndrome compared to those receiving vancomycin. However, despite the adverse reactions, antimicrobials can be safely administered to children to treat nosocomial infections caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria. CONCLUSION: Both linezolid and vancomycin showed good efficacy in the treatment of bacterial infections caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria in hospitalized children. However, linezolid stands out regarding its pharmacological safety. Importantly, to strengthen this conclusion, further clinical trials are needed to provide additional evidence.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infección Hospitalaria , Linezolid , Vancomicina , Humanos , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Niño , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Preescolar , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Lactante , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND Cutaneous adverse drug reactions are the skin's response to a systemic exposure to drugs. Linezolid is an oral oxazolidine used to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Even though it has well-known adverse effects, purpuric cutaneous adverse drug reactions to linezolid have been scarcely described. This report is of a Puerto Rican man in his 80s who developed an extensive purpuric drug eruption secondary to linezolid use. Clinicians should be aware of this phenomenon, since prompt identification and discontinuation of the agent are essential for recovery. CASE REPORT An 89-year-old Puerto Rican man was given oral linezolid therapy for healthcare-associated pneumonia and developed a widespread, purpuric cutaneous eruption 5 days into therapy. His condition prompted immediate discontinuation of the drug. Forty-eight hours after stopping the medication, he visited the Emergency Department. Abdominal punch biopsy revealed a superficial and perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with dermal eosinophils, a pathologic finding consistent with a purpuric drug eruption. This allowed for a timely diagnosis, exclusion of other mimickers, such as cutaneous vasculitis, and effective management. CONCLUSIONS Cutaneous adverse drug reactions to linezolid have been scarcely reported in the literature. Due to the low incidence of this manifestation, the identification of the causative agent and accompanying treatment may be delayed. Mainstays in therapy are avoidance of the offending agent and treatment with corticosteroids, antihistamines, barrier ointments, and oral analgesics. Primary healthcare providers should be aware of linezolid-induced cutaneous manifestations, diagnostic clues, and treatment options so they can rapidly identify and effectively treat such complications.
Asunto(s)
Erupciones por Medicamentos , Exantema , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Púrpura , Vasculitis , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Linezolid/efectos adversos , Púrpura/inducido químicamente , Púrpura/complicaciones , Púrpura/patología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/patología , Vasculitis/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize the first 14 optrA-carrying linezolid resistant E. faecalis clinical isolates recovered in seven Argentinian hospitals between 2016 and 2021. The epidemiology of optrA-carrying isolates and the optrA genetic context were determined. METHODS: The isolates were phenotypically and genotypically characterized. Susceptibility to 13 antimicrobial agents was performed; clonal relationship was assessed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Data provided by the whole-genome sequencing were used for identification of sequence types, antimicrobial resistance genes, optrA variants, phylogenetic tree, and mobile genetic elements responsible to the dissemination of these strains. RESULTS: All the optrA-carrying E. faecalis isolates were multidrug-resistant and harboured several antimicrobial resistance genes. They carried three optrA variants and belonged to different lineages; however, three of them belonged to the hyperepidemic CC16. Mobile genetic elements were detected in all the isolates. The analysis of the optrA flanking region suggests the plasmidic localization in most of the isolates. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of optrA-mediated linezolid resistance in Argentina. The emergence and dissemination of the optrA genes in clinical E. faecalis isolates are of concern and highlights the importance of initiating the antimicrobial surveillance of Enterococcus spp. under a One Health strategy.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Enterococcus faecalis , Linezolid/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Argentina , Filogenia , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/genética , Antiinfecciosos/farmacologíaRESUMEN
Beyond the development of resistance, the effects of antibiotics on bacteria and microbial communities are complex and far from exhaustively studied. In the context of the current global antimicrobial resistance crisis, understanding the adaptive and physiological responses of bacteria to antimicrobials is of paramount importance along with the development of new therapies. Bacterial dependence on antibiotics is a phenomenon in which antimicrobials instead of eliminating the pathogens actually provide a boost for their growth. This trait comprises an extreme example of the complexities of responses elicited by microorganisms to these drugs. This compelling evolutionary trait was readily described along with the first wave of antibiotics use and dependence to various antimicrobials has been reported. Nevertheless, current molecular characterizations have been focused on dependence on vancomycin, linezolid and colistin, three critically important antibiotics frequently used as last resource therapy for multi resistant pathogens. Outstanding advances have been made in understanding the molecular basis for the dependence to vancomycin, including specific mutations involved. Regarding linezolid and colistin, the general physiological components affected by the dependence, namely ribosomes and membrane function respectively, have been established. Nonetheless the implications of antibiotic dependence in clinically relevant features, such as virulence, epidemics, relationship with development of resistance, diagnostics and therapy effectiveness require clarification. This review presents a brief introduction of the phenomenon of bacterial dependence to antibiotics and a summary on early and current research concerning the basis for this trait. Furthermore, the available information on the effect of dependence in key clinical aspects is discussed. The studies performed so far underline the need to fully disclose the biological and clinical significance of this trait in pathogens to successfully assess its role in resistance and to design adjusted therapies.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Venenos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Vancomicina/farmacología , Linezolid/farmacología , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , Colistina/farmacología , Venenos/farmacología , Bacterias/genética , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Farmacorresistencia BacterianaRESUMEN
Adverse reaction reporting is essential to understand the actual safety of marketed medicines. There are cases of patients with multidrug intolerance syndrome, an under-reported entity, which can occur when adverse reactions to more than two pharmacologically unrelated drugs occur in the same patient. We describe the case of a woman diagnosed with multisensitive Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis who experienced adverse reactions to five structurally unrelated antibiotics with different mechanisms of action in two consecutive hospitalisations. The reactions were secondary to cefazolin (tricytopenia), vancomycin (renal injury), daptomycin (elevated creatine phosphokinase) and linezolid (hepatotoxicity) in the first hospitalization, and to cotrimoxazole (thrombocytopenia) in the second. Transient damage to different organ systems was observed in all cases. Finally, hospital discharge was granted with clindamycin without further intercurrences until treatment was completed. This case could correspond to the aforementioned syndrome or to an as yet uncharacterized entity.
La información sobre reacciones adversas es fundamental para conocer la seguridad real de los medicamentos comercializados. Existen casos de pacientes con síndrome de intolerancia a múltiples drogas, una entidad poco reportada, la que puede presentarse cuando en un mismo paciente ocurren reacciones adversas a más de dos medicamentos no relacionados farmacológicamente. Se describe el caso de una mujer con diagnóstico de endocarditis por Staphylococcus aureus multisensible, que cursó con reacciones adversas a cinco antibióticos estructuralmente no relacionados y con mecanismos de acción diferentes, en dos internaciones consecutivas. Las reacciones fueron secundarias a cefazolina (tricitopenia), vancomicina (injuria renal), daptomicina (elevación de creatina fosfoquinasa) y linezolid (hepatotoxicidad) en la primera internación, y a cotrimoxazol (plaquetopenia) en la segunda. En todos los casos se observó daño transitorio en diferentes sistemas de órganos. Finalmente, se otorgó alta hospitalaria con clindamicina sin nuevas intercurrencias hasta finalizar tratamiento. Este caso podría corresponder al síndrome antes mencionado o a una entidad aún no caracterizada.
Asunto(s)
Daptomicina , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Femenino , Humanos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Vancomicina/efectos adversos , Linezolid/efectos adversos , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) are among the most abundant members of human skin microbiome. CoNS have lately been recognized as substantial agents in plethora of infections, especially nosocomial infections in preterm infants and immunocompromised patients. Staphylococcus haemolyticus is the second most common species isolated from blood, and identification is further hindered when there is a deviation in morphology from the classical one. Here, we report an uncommon case of multidrug resistant mucoid S. hemolyticus isolated from blood in a patient of polytrauma. The patient was managed with ceftriaxone-sulbactam, gentamicin, and meropenem as empirical therapy, which was subsequently changed to intravenous vancomycin. The patient showed favorable response to treatment. Mucoid isolates are known to be more virulent and multi-drug resistant than the classical morphotypes. We also conducted systematic review to decipher the prevalence of mucoid S. hemolyticus and linezolid (LZD) resistance in the same. This case highlights the significance of awareness of mucoid phenotypes of Gram-positive cocci for clinical microbiologists to reach accurate identification. Resistance to LZD further underscores the need of restriction policies in hospitals and to roll out antimicrobial stewardship program stringently, so that the growing resistance could be contained.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Lactante , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus haemolyticus , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , CoagulasaRESUMEN
Background: In recent years Staphylococcus epidermidis has been considered an important and frequent causative agent of health care-associated infections (HAIs), increasing the costs of hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality. Antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation are the most important obstacles in the treatment of infections caused by this microorganism. The aim of this work was to determine the most prevalent STs, as well as the antibiotic resistance profile and biofilm formation of S. epidermidis clinical isolates obtained from hospitalized patients in two hospitals in Acapulco, Guerrero in two time periods. Methods: Twenty methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis strains isolated from patients with bacteremia in two hospitals in two time periods were analyzed. Identification and antibiotic susceptibility were performed using the Vitek automated system. Molecular confirmation of the identification and methicillin resistance was performed by duplex PCR of the mecA and nuc genes. Biofilm production was analyzed, and the clonal origin was determined by multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Results: We identified 14 antibiotic resistance profiles as well as 13 sequence types (ST), including the new ST761. We also found that ST2 and ST23 were the most prevalent and, together with ST59, were found in both time periods. Seventeen of our clinical isolates were multidrug-resistant, but all of them were sensitive to linezolid and vancomycin, and this was not related to biofilm production. Additionally, we standardized a duplex PCR to identify methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis strains. In conclusion, S. epidermidis STs 2, 23, and 59 were found in both time periods. This study is the first report of S. epidermidis ST761. The clinical isolates obtained in this work showed a high multidrug resistance that is apparently not related to biofilm production.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Staphylococcus epidermidis/genética , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Linezolid (LNZ) is a new-generation synthetic molecule for the antibacterial treatment of severe infections, particularly in infective cases where the bacterial resistance to first-choice drugs is caused by Gram-positive pathogens. In this context, since 2009, some strains resistant to LNZ in patients with long-term treatments have been reported. Therefore, there is a need to use not only new drug molecules with antibacterial activities in the dosage form but also a different approach to pharmacotherapeutic strategies for skin infections, which lead to a reduction in the concentration of biocides. This work explores LNZ hosted at two isostructural MOFs, MOF-74(Zn) and MOF-74(Cu), as promising antimicrobial systems for gradual biocide release within 6 h. These systems reach a lower minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in comparison to free LNZ. Even a decreased MIC value is also observed, which is an encouraging result regarding the efficiency of the systems to control concentration-dependent antimicrobial resistance.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Humanos , Linezolid/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad MicrobianaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Spinal Tuberculosis (STB) represents between 1% and 2% of total tuberculosis cases. STB management remains challenging; the first-line approach consists of medical treatment, while surgery is reserved for patients with complications. No data regarding STB treatment with bedaquiline-containing regimens are available in the literature. CASE DESCRIPTION: Herein, we report the case of a 21-year-old man from Côte d'Ivoire with a multidrug resistance STB with subcutaneous abscess. After approval of the hospital off-label drug committee, we started bedaquiline 400 mg daily for two weeks, followed by 200 mg three times per week, for 22 weeks, associated with linezolid 600 mg daily, rifabutin 450 mg daily, and amikacin 750 mg daily (interrupted after eight weeks). During treatment, we performed a weekly EKG. No QT prolongation was shown, but inverted T waves appeared, requiring several cardiological consultations and cardiac MRI, but no cardiac dysfunction was found. After 24 weeks, bedaquiline was replaced with moxifloxacin 400 mg daily. The patient continued treatment for another year. We performed another computer tomography at the end of treatment, confirming the cure. DISCUSSION: A salvage regimen containing bedaquiline proved effective in treating multidrug-resistance tuberculosis spinal infection without causing severe adverse effects. However, further studies are needed to evaluate better bedaquiline bone penetration and the correct duration of treatment with bedaquiline in MDR spinal tuberculosis.
Asunto(s)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Osteomielitis , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos , Tuberculosis de la Columna Vertebral , Absceso/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Amicacina/farmacología , Amicacina/uso terapéutico , Antituberculosos/efectos adversos , Diarilquinolinas/farmacología , Diarilquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Linezolid/farmacología , Masculino , Moxifloxacino/farmacología , Moxifloxacino/uso terapéutico , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Rifabutina/farmacología , Rifabutina/uso terapéutico , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis de la Columna Vertebral/inducido químicamente , Tuberculosis de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Tuberculosis de la Columna Vertebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Objetivo: Comparar custos da terapia endovenosa exclusiva com linezolida com os custos da terapia iniciada por via endovenosa com transição para via oral após 72 horas, como estratégia de intervenção em programas de gestão de antimicrobianos. Métodos: Avaliação econômica de custo-minimização comparando custos diretos da terapia endovenosa exclusiva com linezolida com a terapia endovenosa seguida de transição para via oral em cenário simulado, sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), com árvore de decisão como modelo para tomada de decisão. Resultados: A alternativa englobando a transição de via mostrou-se a mais econômica em todos os cenários analisados. Para 28 dias de tratamento com linezolida, houve redução de 22% nos custos, considerando o paciente internado. Ao considerar alta após o sexto dia de tratamento, a redução de custos variou de 26%, com financiamento pelo SUS do restante do tratamento, a 84%, com financiamento do tratamento pós-alta pelo paciente. Conclusão: Conclui-se que a transição de via de linezolida é uma importante estratégia nos programas de gerenciamento de antimicrobianos, capaz de gerar economia significativa para a instituição. As avaliações econômicas de custo-minimização, nesse contexto, são uma importante ferramenta para demonstrar o aspecto econômico com potencial para sensibilizar gestores e tomadores de decisão.
Objective: To compare the direct costs of linezolid intravenous therapy with the costs of intravenous therapy switching to oral therapy after 72 hours as an intervention strategy in antimicrobial stewardship programs. Methods: Economic evaluation cost-minimization comparing direct costs of exclusive linezolid intravenous therapy with intravenous therapy for 72 hours and after switching to oral therapy in a simulated scenario, from the perspective of the National Health Service, with a decision tree as a decision modeling. Results: The alternative encompassing the therapy transition proved to be the most economical in all analyzed scenarios. For 28 days of treatment with linezolid, there was a 22% reduction in costs, considering the hospitalized patient. When considering discharge after the sixth day of treatment, the cost reduction ranged from 26%, with funding from the National Health Service for the rest of the treatment, to 84%, with funding for the post-discharge treatment by the patient. Conclusion: It was concluded that the linezolid therapy transition is an important strategy in antimicrobial management programs, capable of generating significant savings for the institution. In this context, economic cost-minimization assessments are an important tool to demonstrate the economic aspect with the potential to raise awareness among managers and decision-makers.
Asunto(s)
Vías de Administración de Medicamentos , Economía Farmacéutica , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Linezolid , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los AntimicrobianosRESUMEN
Objective: This study aimed to compare the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in pediatric patients who used vancomycin (VAN) or linezolid (LNZ) to treat Gram-positive coccus (GPC) infections and to assess which treatment (VAN or LNZ) is the most cost-effective considering a pediatric hospital perspective. Methods: A retrospective cohort was performed to evaluate the occurrence of nephrotoxicity in pediatric patients without previous AKI, with GPC infections that used LNZ, or VAN monitored by serum VAN levels. Initially, descriptive analysis and Fisher and chisquare test were performed for this comparison. Then, a cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted through a decision tree model. The outcomes of interest were the rate of AKI related to the drug and the rate of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and cure. Results: In patients without previous acute kidney injury (AKI), 20% developed nephrotoxicity associated with VAN versus 9.6% in the LNZ group (p = 0.241). As there was no difference in nephrotoxicity between VAN andlinezolid (LNZ), vancomycin (VAN) monitored by serum VAN levels can optimize and rationalize the treatment. The nephrotoxicity risk criterion should not guide the prescription for LNZ. Furthermore, the average global cost of treatment with VAN was approximately R$ 43,000, while for LNZ, it was R$ 71,000. Conclusion: VAN was considered dominant (lower cost and greater effectiveness) over LNZ for treating patients with GPC infection.
Objetivo: Este estudo objetivou comparar a ocorrência de lesão renal aguda (LRA) em pacientes pediátricos que usaram vancomicina (VAN) ou linezolida (LNZ) para tratar infecções por cocos Gram-positivos (CGP) e avaliar qual tratamento (VAN ou LNZ) é o mais custo-efetivo considerando a perspectiva de um hospital pediátrico. Métodos: Foi realizada uma coorte retrospectiva para avaliar a ocorrência de nefrotoxicidade em pacientes pediátricos sem LRA prévia, com infecções por CGP que utilizaram LNZ ou VAN, combinada com vancocinemia. Para essa comparação, inicialmente foram realizados análise descritiva e testes de Fisher e qui-quadrado. Em seguida, foi realizada uma análise de custo-efetividade por meio de um modelo de árvore de decisão. Os desfechos de interesse foram a taxa de LRA relacionada ao medicamento e a taxa de internação em unidade de terapia intensiva e cura. Resultados: Nos pacientes sem LRA prévia, 20% deles desenvolveram nefrotoxicidade associada à VAN versus 9,6% no grupo LNZ (p = 0,241). Como não houve diferença na nefrotoxicidade entre VAN e LNZ, a VAN combinada com a vancocinemia pode otimizar e racionalizar o tratamento, e a prescrição de LNZ não deve ser guiada pelo critério de risco de nefrotoxicidade. Além disso, o custo médio global do tratamento com VAN foi de aproximadamente R$ 43.000, enquanto para LNZ foi de R$ 71.000. Conclusão: Assim, a VAN foi considerada dominante (menor custo e maior eficácia) sobre a LNZ para o tratamento de pacientes com infecção por CGP.
Asunto(s)
Pediatría , Vancomicina , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Insuficiencia Renal , LinezolidRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Resistance to linezolid has become a worldwide concern since it is one of the last-resort antibiotics to treat multidrug-resistant staphylococcal and enterococcal infections. OBJECTIVES: We investigated staphylococcal infections caused by 16 cfr-positive linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a French university hospital from 2015 to 2018. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates was tested by broth microdilution and gradient strips. Genetic determinants of linezolid resistance (including cfr gene and 23S rRNA mutations) were assessed by PCR and WGS; the latter was also used to characterize the cfr-carrying plasmids in S. epidermidis and S. aureus, and to explore the clonal relationship of isolates. RESULTS: All linezolid-resistant staphylococcal isolates harboured the same cfr-carrying plasmid, sharing 99% identity with the previously described pSA737. The three S. aureus isolates belonged to different STs (ST8, ST72, ST2416); the 13 methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE) belonged to ST2 and harboured both cfr and mutations in genes encoding 23S rRNA and ribosomal proteins. Phylogenetic analysis grouped the MRSE isolates into two clusters, one of which (nâ=â12 isolates) belonged to the recently reported multidrug-resistant worldwide-disseminated S. epidermidis lineages. CONCLUSIONS: The results presented herein highlight the persistence and efficient spread of a cfr-carrying plasmid in a hospital related both to the dissemination of a multidrug-resistant S. epidermidis clone and the in vivo interspecies transfer of cfr between S. epidermidis and S. aureus. The emergence of linezolid-resistant strains should be closely monitored, and the mechanisms involved systematically explored in order to limit the spread of plasmid-mediated resistance.
Asunto(s)
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Células Clonales , Hospitales , Humanos , Linezolid/farmacología , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Filogenia , ARN Ribosómico 23S/genética , Staphylococcus , Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcus epidermidisRESUMEN
We aimed to assess the factors associated with 30-day mortality in patients with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREf) bloodstream infection (BSI) who received treatment with linezolid in an 11-year retrospective cohort of patients with VREf BSI. A univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine 30-day mortality factors. Moreover, a Cox proportional hazards analysis of predictor covariates of mortality was performed. Eighty patients were included in the final analysis; 42 (53%) died and 38 (47%) survived 30 days after the index bacteremia. Thirteen patients of 42 (31%) died in the first 7 days. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.76; p < 0.001) in the multivariate analysis. Moreover, VREf BSI persisting for more than 48 hours was a strong factor related to 30-day mortality (aOR, 19.6; 95% CI: 1.46-263; p = 0.01). Adequate control of infection source showed a trend to be protective without reaching significance in the multivariate analysis (aOR, 0.19; 95% CI: 0.04-1.0; p = 0.05). The Cox proportional hazards analysis confirmed the same significant mortality predictor besides linezolid treatment within the first 48 hours as a protective factor (hazard ratio 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23-0.92, p = 0.02). Severely ill patients with high APACHE II score and persistent bacteremia have a higher risk of failure with linezolid therapy.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Enterococcus faecium , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Linezolid/efectos adversos , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , México , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Vancomicina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Since 2018, important changes in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis have been produced in the light of new evidence. The discovery of new anti-tuberculosis drugs, such as bedaquiline and nitroimidazopirane derivatives, as well as the use of repurposed drugs, led to international organizations to recommend new, totally oral, treatment regimens for mono-resistant and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, leaving aside the prolonged use of injectables, with their inherent toxicity and discomfort. Some definitions of drug-resistant tuberculosis have changed. The duration of treatment is also under review, leading some new regimens under study, such as BPaL (bedaquiline, pretomanid and linezolid), to a duration similar to that for treating susceptible tuberculosis. In this narrative review, we describe the new definitions, some basic diagnostic aspects, the pharmacological aspects, and the new classification of drugs to be used in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis as well as the currently proposed schemes to treat it available within the Argentinean context. Finally, we include a brief review of ongoing clinical trials on new shortened treatments.
Desde 2018 han surgido a la luz de la evidencia importantes cambios en el tratamiento de la tuberculosis drogorresistente. El descubrimiento de nuevas drogas antituberculosis, como la bedaquilina y los derivados de nitroimidazopiranos, así como la utilización de drogas repropuestas, llevó a la recomendación de organismos internacionales de nuevos esquemas de tratamiento de la tuberculosis monorresistente y multidrogorresistente que son totalmente orales y así dejan de lado el uso prolongado de inyectables, con su inherente toxicidad e incomodidad. Algunas de las definiciones de tuberculosis drogorresistente han cambiado. También está en revisión el tiempo de su tratamiento y con algunos nuevos esquemas en estudio, como el BpaL (bedaquilina, pretomanid y linezolid), se ha logrado una duración similar a la del tratamiento de la tuberculosis pansensible. En esta revisión bibliográfica narrativa describimos las nuevas definiciones, algunos aspectos diagnósticos básicos, los aspectos farmacológicos y la nueva clasificación de las drogas a utilizar en el tratamiento de la tuberculosis drogorresistente, así como los esquemas actualmente propuestos para tratarla, contextualizados con la realidad nacional. Finalizamos con una breve reseña de los estudios clínicos en curso de nuevos esquemas acortados de tratamiento.
Asunto(s)
Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Humanos , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , Tuberculosis Resistente a Múltiples Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Severe lactic acidosis, a mitochondrial toxicity caused by the recommended standard dosage of linezolid (LZD), may occur in patients with impaired renal function. We describe an adult male who underwent kidney transplantation with stably impaired renal function, severe dyspnea, and abdominal discomfort. He received a standard oral dose of LZD (600 mg twice daily) and azithromycin for three weeks with a reduced immunosuppressant dose due to pulmonary non-tuberculosis mycobacterial infection. He was alert and afebrile, with a blood pressure of 140/60 mmHg. Pertinent laboratory data showed: pH 7.12, PaCO2 13.6 mmHg; HCO3- 4.3 mmol/L and serum lactate 18.4 mmol/L. His trough serum LZD concentration reached toxic levels (21.4 µg/mL). With hemodialysis, his clinical symptoms improved, with a decline in serum LZD (9.8µg/mL) and lactate (3.2 mmol/L). Chronic standard dose LZD in patients with impaired renal function can lead to life-threatening lactic acidosis, especially in coexisting conditions that reduce LZD metabolism.
Asunto(s)
Acidosis Láctica , Acidosis Láctica/inducido químicamente , Acidosis Láctica/diagnóstico , Adulto , Humanos , Riñón/fisiología , Linezolid/efectos adversos , MasculinoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: After the wide use of linezolid (LZD), numerous reports of uncontrolled studies have suggested that LZD is associated with high rates of thrombocytopenia. We conducted this matched case-control study to identify the risk factors for LZD-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) during the period of myelosuppression. METHODS: We retrospectively retrieved laboratory and clinical data from the medical records of 180 Chinese with AML. Among them, 60 received ≥ 72 h of therapy with LZD during myelosuppression. The remaining patients who did not receive LZD therapy were matched individually in a ratio of 1:2 according to the basic characteristics of the LZD group. RESULTS: We found that in the LZD group, age, history of liver or kidney disease, the baseline level of bilirubin, and creatinine clearance rate (CCR) did not affect the recovery time of platelets. Patients who received LZD for more than 7 days during the period of myelosuppression had a significantly longer time of platelet recovery and platelet count increase. CONCLUSION: The use of LZD > 7 days during the course of myelosuppression and the low level of albumin can prolong the time required for platelet count increase and recovery. Further study is needed to assess the potential adverse effects of LZD in larger AML patient populations.