Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 310
Filtrar
1.
Bone Joint J ; 106-B(8): 842-848, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39084641

RESUMEN

Aims: Vascular compromise due to arterial injury is a rare but serious complication of a proximal humeral fracture. The aims of this study were to report its incidence in a large urban population, and to identify clinical and radiological factors which are associated with this complication. We also evaluated the results of the use of our protocol for the management of these injuries. Methods: A total of 3,497 adult patients with a proximal humeral fracture were managed between January 2015 and December 2022 in a single tertiary trauma centre. Their mean age was 66.7 years (18 to 103) and 2,510 (72%) were female. We compared the demographic data, clinical features, and configuration of those whose fracture was complicated by vascular compromise with those of the remaining patients. The incidence of vascular compromise was calculated from national population data, and predictive factors for its occurrence were investigated using univariate analysis. Results: A total of 18 patients (0.5%) had a proximal humeral fracture and clinical evidence of vascular compromise, giving an annual incidence of 0.29 per 100,000 of the population. Their mean age was 68.7 years (45 to 92) and ten (56%) were female. Evidence of a mixed pattern neurological deficit (brachial plexus palsy) (odds ratio (OR) 380.6 (95% CI 85.9 to 1,685.8); p < 0.001), complete separation of the proximal shaft from the humeral head with medial displacement (OR 39.5 (95% CI 14.0 to 111.8); p < 0.001), and a fracture-dislocation (OR 5.0 (95% CI 1.6 to 15.3); p = 0.015) were all associated with an increased risk of associated vascular compromise. A policy of reduction and fixation of the fracture prior to vascular surgical intervention had favourable outcomes without vascular sequelae. Conclusion: The classic signs of distal ischaemia are often absent in patients with proximal injuries to major vessels. We were able to identify specific clinical and radiological 'red flags' which, particularly when present in combination, should increase the suspicion of a fracture with an associated vascular injury, and facilitate early diagnosis and appropriate combined orthopaedic and vascular intervention.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas del Hombro , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Fracturas del Hombro/epidemiología , Fracturas del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Hombro/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Incidencia , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven
2.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 466, 2024 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879480

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Traumatic proximal tibiofibular fracture and dislocation (PTFD) have been rarely studied and are easily missed in clinical practice. PTFD is considered a marker of severely traumatized knees. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the incidence and impact of PTFD in traumatized knees with vascular injury. METHODS: Patients with knee trauma and vascular injury were included from January 2022 to October 2023. X-rays and CT scans of included patients were retrospectively analyzed to determine the presence of PTFD. Patients were further divided into PTFD group and non-PTFD group for further comparative analysis. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients (28 limbs) were included. Incidence of PTFD was 39.3% (11/28) in traumatic knee with vascular injury, including 8 anterolateral dislocations and 3 posteromedial dislocations. PTFD group had significantly more limbs with open injuries compared with non-PTFD group (10/11 VS 7/17, p<0.05). Amputation rate of PTFD group was as high as 40% (4/10), compared to 23.5% (4/17) in non-PTFD group. However, the difference between two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PTFD was easily overlooked or missed. In traumatized knees with vascular injury, incidence of PTFD was high. The presence of PTFD might indicate severe knee trauma and the possibility of open injury. Although there was no significant difference compared with non-PTFD group, PTFD group had a relatively high amputation rate of 40%.


Asunto(s)
Peroné , Luxación de la Rodilla , Fracturas de la Tibia , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fracturas de la Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Tibia/epidemiología , Luxación de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Luxación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Peroné/lesiones , Peroné/diagnóstico por imagen , Incidencia , Adulto Joven , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Adolescente
3.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 13004, 2024 06 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844514

RESUMEN

Blast and gunshot-induced penetrating traumatic vascular injuries represent a significant portion of patients with vascular trauma in countries where there are higher rates of war-related violence. These injuries are especially challenging in resource-limited countries due to early diagnosis and transfer delays. This report aimed to present our experience regarding the surgical management and outcome of such injuries at a major referral vascular surgery centre in the country. A retrospective descriptive review of 326 patients with blast and gunshot-induced penetrating traumatic vascular injuries managed during a five-year period between April 2018 and April 2023. The demographics, mechanism of injury, type of vascular injury, Anatomical location, time to the operation, length of hospital stay, amount of blood products given, concomitant neuroskeletal injuries, development of Vascular injury associated acute kidney injury, surgical procedures performed and patient outcome were reviewed. In this study, 326 patients with 445 vascular injuries fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most of the patients were male 92.3%, and the mean age was 28.3 ± 9.9 years. The gunshot mechanism of vascular injury was implicated in 76.1% of the injuries, and explosive-induced injury was 78 (23.9%). 193 (59.2%) of the patients had isolated arterial injuries, 117 (35.9%) patients had combined arterial and venous injuries while 18 (4.9%) patients had isolated venous injuries. The most commonly injured arteries were the femoral artery, followed by Brachial and popliteal artery injuries (26.1%, 23.5% and 19.4%, respectively). The median time to revascularization was 8.8 ± 8.7 h. 46.8% of the patients had Concomitant fractures, while 26.5% had Concomitant nerve injuries. Only three patients had temporary non-heparin-bound shunts during their arrival. The most common surgical intervention in arterial injuries was reversed saphenous vein graft 46.1%. The mortality was 5.8% and 7.7% of the patients needed secondary amputation. The majority of wartime arterial injuries are a result of Blast and gunshot vascular injuries. Frequent need for autologous vein grafts should be considered to manage such injuries. Results are encouraging despite delays in intervention; therefore, all viable limbs should be revascularized, keeping in mind the long-term functionality of the limb.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos por Explosión , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Masculino , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/complicaciones , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Traumatismos por Explosión/cirugía , Traumatismos por Explosión/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adolescente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares
5.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 41(1): 17-23, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608293

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Vascular injuries in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) occur due to the vascular manipulation needed to achieve optimal disc space exposure. In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate intraoperative vascular injuries in patients undergoing single- and multilevel ALIF at a large tertiary academic center. METHODS: Prospectively collected data specifically addressing postoperative complications in patients who underwent ALIF by neurosurgery spine faculty working with a specialized vascular surgeon were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic characteristics and intraoperative data were collected. Patients were split into vascular injury and non-vascular injury groups. Outcome comparisons were conducted using the chi-square exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for categorical and continuous data, respectively. Logistic regression was used to investigate associations with vascular injury, with univariate analysis first conducted to identify candidate associations. Based on these results, variables demonstrating a between-groups test statistic of p < 0.10 were included in the multivariate analysis to determine the independent predictors of vascular injuries. RESULTS: In total, 323 patients who underwent ALIF procedures were identified: 51% were male (n = 166) and 49% were female (n = 157). The mean age was 57.1 years, with 56% (n = 182) having undergone prior lumbar surgery. Vascular injuries were encountered intraoperatively in 7.1% (n = 23) of patients, and the majority (91% [n = 21]) involved the left common iliac vein. Patients with vascular injuries were statistically older (mean 63.6 vs 56.6 years), had greater incidence rates of coronary artery disease, opioid use, multilevel ALIF surgery involving the L2-3 level, and surgery involving multiple disc spaces, had more multilevel anterior instrumentation, and experienced greater blood loss during surgery and longer length of stay (all p < 0.05). Overall, there was 1 death (0.3%) secondary to aortic artery injury. Multivariate analysis identified opioid use, multilevel ALIF involving L2-3, and multiple interbodies as statistically independent predictors of vascular injury (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Identifying patient risk factors can reduce the risk of vascular injuries in ALIF. Opioid use, multilevel ALIF involving L2-3, and multiple interbodies were independent predictors of vascular injuries in ALIF.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Fusión Vertebral , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anciano , Adulto , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología
6.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 105: 189-200, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588951

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric extremity vascular injuries constitute a rare yet serious entity that can lead to serious complications especially if left untreated or become late diagnosed. In our scoping review, we sought to evaluate different characteristics and outcomes of pediatric and combined adult trauma centers (ATCs) in the management of pediatric extremity vascular injury. METHODS: We sought to analyze various characteristics and parameters that differentiate a dedicated pediatric and a combined pediatric ATC in terms of effectiveness and quality of care in the acute setting and to describe special features and characteristics of an acute vascular disease that constitute pediatric population unique from the aspect of diagnosis and management. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping reviews guidelines to conduct the study. RESULTS: The search identified 8,815 records in title using MeSH terms from PubMed/MEDLINE database among which 12 studies reporting a total of 2,124 pediatric patients with vascular extremity injuries were included for analysis. Incidence of pediatric extremity vascular injury was 0.5%. Upper extremity injuries were the most frequent presenting in 63% of cases followed by lower extremity injuries in 37% of cases. Blunt injuries were marginally more common than penetrating injuries (58% vs. 42%). In-hospital mortality and morbidity ranged from 13.2% to 0.9% and 13% to 30%, respectively. Limb-salvage rates were high, ranging from 92% to 99%. Furthermore, there are no clearly defined clinical guidelines involving the mode of imaging and diagnosis, the surgical specialties involved and the competency of nursing or medical staff overall. CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated children trauma centers theoretically represent the optimal path for acute pediatric trauma admission, especially in complex trauma necessitating vascular reconstruction. However, in the current setting of rapidly increasing health costs and economic crisis worldwide, regional or resource-related factors make this option rather unavailable. In any case, it is imperative the clinicians have a high index of suspicion when confronting with these types of injuries because early diagnosis is highly related with reduced morbidity and superior outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Centros Traumatológicos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Humanos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapia , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidad , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Centros Traumatológicos/normas , Niño , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Preescolar , Masculino , Femenino , Lactante , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Extremidades/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidades/lesiones , Factores de Tiempo
7.
Surgery ; 176(1): 205-210, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38614911

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Peripheral vascular trauma is a major contributing factor to long-term disability and mortality among patients with traumatic injuries. However, an analysis focusing on individuals at a high risk of experiencing limb loss due to rural and urban peripheral vascular trauma is lacking. METHOD: This was a retrospective analysis of the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients (≥18 years) undergoing open or endovascular procedures after admission for peripheral vascular trauma were identified using the 2016 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients from rural regions were considered Rural, whereas the remainder comprised Urban. The primary outcome of the study was primary amputation. Multivariable regression models were developed to evaluate rurality with outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Of 29,083 patients, 4,486 (15.6%) were Rural. Rural were older (41 [28-59] vs 37 [27-54] years, P < .001), with a similar distribution of female sex (23.0 vs 21.3%, P = .09) and transfers from other facilities (2.8 vs 2.5%, P = .34). After adjustment, Rural status was not associated with the odds of mortality (P = .82), with urban as reference. Rural status was, however, associated with greater odds of limb amputation (adjusted odds ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.47-2.32) and reduced index hospitalization cost by $7,100 (95% confidence interval $3,500-10,800). Additionally, compared to patients from urban locations, rurality was associated with similar odds of non-home discharge and 30-day readmission. Over the study period, the marginal effect of rurality on the risk-adjusted rates of amputation significantly increased (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo peripheral vascular trauma management in rural areas appear to increasingly exhibit a higher likelihood of amputation, with lower incremental costs and a lower risk of 30-day readmission. These findings underscore disparities in access to optimal trauma vascular care as well as limited resources in rural regions.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Población Rural , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidad , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Bases de Datos Factuales
8.
J Vasc Surg ; 80(2): 373-378, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38641255

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgeons are often called upon to provide emergent surgical assistance to other specialties for iatrogenic complications, both intraoperatively and in the inpatient setting. The management of iatrogenic vascular injury remains a critical role of the vascular surgeon, especially in the context of the increasing adoption of percutaneous procedures by other specialties. This study aims to characterize consultation timing, management, and outcomes for iatrogenic vascular injuries. METHODS: This study identified patients for whom vascular surgery was consulted for iatrogenic vascular complications from February 1, 2022, to May 12, 2023. Patient information, including demographic information, injury details, and details of any operative intervention, was retrospectively collected from February 1, 2022, to October 13, 2022, and prospectively collected for the remainder of the study period. Analyses were performed with R (version 2022.02.03). RESULTS: There were 87 patients with consultations related to iatrogenic vascular injury. Of these, 42 (46%) were female and the mean age was 59 years (±18 years). The most common consulting services were cardiology (32%), cardiothoracic surgery (26%), general surgery (8%), and neurointerventional radiology (10%). Reasons for consultation included hemorrhage (36%), limb ischemia (36%), and treatment of pseudoaneurysm (23%). A total of 24% of consults were intraoperative, 20% of consults related to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation, and 16% of consults related to ventricular assist devices including left ventricular assist device and intra-aortic balloon pump. The majority of these consult requests (60%) occurred during evening and night hours (5 PM to 7 AM). Emergent intervention was required in 62% of cases and consisted of primary open surgical repair of arterial injury (54%), endovascular intervention (21%), and open thromboembolectomy (15%). Overall, in-hospital mortality for the patient cohort was 20% and the reintervention rate was 23%, reflecting the underlying complexity of the illness and nature of the vascular injury in this patient group. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeons play an essential role in managing emergent life-threatening hemorrhagic and ischemic iatrogenic vascular complications in the hospitalized setting. The complications require immediate bedside or intraoperative consult and often emergent open surgical or endovascular intervention. Furthermore, many of these require urgent management in the evening or overnight hours, and therefore the high frequency of these events represents a potential significant resource utilization and workforce issue to the vascular surgery workforce.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapia , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Anciano , Adulto , Factores de Tiempo , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 7917, 2024 04 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575738

RESUMEN

Contained vascular injuries (CVI) of spleen include pseudoaneurysms (PSA) and arterio-venous fistulae (AV-fistulae), and their reported prevalence varies. Our purpose was to assess the prevalence of early splenic CVI seen on admission CT in patients with splenic trauma admitted to a single level 1 trauma center in 2013-2021, and its detection in different CT protocols. A retrospective, single-center longitudinal cohort study. Nine-year data (2013-2021) of all patients with suspected or manifest abdominal trauma were retrieved. All patients, > 15 years with an ICD code for splenic trauma (S36.0XX) were included. CT and angiographic examinations were identified. Reports and images were reviewed. Splenic CVI CT criterion was a focal collection of vascular contrast that decreases in attenuation with delayed imaging. Number of CVIs and treatment was based on medical records and/or available angioembolization data. Of 2805 patients with abdominal trauma, 313 patients (313/2805; 11.2%) fulfilled the study entry criteria. 256 patients (256/313; 81.8%) had a CT examination. Sixteen patients had splenectomy before CT, and the final study group included 240 patients (240/313; 76.7%). Median New Injury Severity Score (NISS) was 27 and 87.5% of patients had NISS > 15. Splenic CVI was found in 20 patients, which yields a prevalence of 8.3% (20/240; 95% CI 5.2-12.6%). In those cases with both late arterial and venous phase images available, CVI was seen in 14.5% of cases (18/124, 95% CI 8.6-22.0%). None of the patients with CVI died within 30 days of the injury. The prevalence of early splenic CVI in patients with a splenic trauma was 8.3-14.5% (95% CI 5.2-22.0%). Our data suggests that both arterial and venous phase are needed for CT diagnosis. The 30-day outcome in terms of mortality was good.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Embolización Terapéutica , Enfermedades del Bazo , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Longitudinales , Prevalencia , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia
10.
Am Surg ; 90(6): 1768-1771, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38525516

RESUMEN

Peripheral vascular trauma (PVT) is rare in children, with an incidence estimated below 1%. We studied pediatric PVT and risk factors for major amputation by accessing the 2019 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Demographics, injury type and location, trauma center capability, injury severity score (ISS), length of stay (LOS), and major amputation rates were evaluated. Statistical analysis included chi-square testing for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Of 130,554 pediatric trauma patients, 1196 (.9%) had 1460 upper extremity (UE) and lower extremity (LE) PVT. Patients were predominantly male (n = 933, 78%) with a mean age of 14 years. Most patients suffered penetrating injury (n = 744, 62.2%). The most common vessels injuries were radial (n = 198, 13.6%) and femoral (n = 196, 13.4%). Major amputation occurred in 2.6% of patients (n = 31). Patients who suffered blunt injury (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.5-7.5; P = .004) and lower limb PVT (OR, 11.1; 95% CI, 3.3-37.9, P = .0001) had higher odds of amputation.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Incidencia , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Niño , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Preescolar , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas Penetrantes/epidemiología , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Lactante
11.
J Vasc Surg ; 80(1): 64-69, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38493898

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is designed to manage severe hemorrhagic shock. Popularized in medical care during military conflicts, the concept has emerged as a lifesaving technique that is utilized around the United States. Literature on risks of REBOA placement, especially vascular injuries, are not well-reported. Our goal was to assess the incidence of vascular injury from REBOA placement and the risk factors associated with injury and death among these patients at our institution. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent REBOA placement between September 2017 and June 2022 at our Level 1 Trauma Center. The primary outcome variable was the presence of an injury related to REBOA insertion or use. Secondary outcomes studied were limb loss, the need for dialysis, and mortality. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, χ2, and t-tests as appropriate for the variable type. RESULTS: We identified 99 patients who underwent REBOA placement during the study period. The mean age of patients was 43.1 ± 17.2 years, and 67.7% (67/99) were males. The majority of injuries were from blunt trauma (79.8%; 79/99). Twelve of the patients (12.1%; 12/99) had a vascular injury related to REBOA placement. All but one required intervention. The complications included local vessel injury (58.3%; 7/12), distal embolization (16.7%; 2/12), excessive bleeding requiring vascular consult (8.3%; 1/12), pseudoaneurysm requiring intervention (8.3%; 1/12), and one incident of inability to remove the REBOA device (8.3%; 1/12). The repairs were performed by vascular surgery (75%; 9/12), interventional radiology (16.7%; 2/12), and trauma surgery (8.3%; 1/12). There was no association of age, gender, race, and blunt vs penetrating injury to REBOA-related complications. Mortality in this patient population was high (40.4%), but there was no association with REBOA-related complications. Ipsilateral limb loss occurred in two patients with REBOA-related injuries, but both were due to their injuries and not to REBOA-related ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Although vascular complications are not unusual in REBOA placement, there does not appear to be an association with limb loss, dialysis, or mortality if they are addressed promptly. Close coordination between vascular surgeons and trauma surgeons is essential in patients undergoing REBOA placement.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión con Balón , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Resucitación , Choque Hemorrágico , Centros Traumatológicos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Humanos , Oclusión con Balón/efectos adversos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Adulto , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapia , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Resucitación/efectos adversos , Choque Hemorrágico/etiología , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Aorta/lesiones , Aorta/cirugía , Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Medición de Riesgo , Adulto Joven , Incidencia , Amputación Quirúrgica
12.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 68(2): 257-264, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38428670

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Extremity vascular trauma in children can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Most published studies have focused on supracondylar humeral fracture related injuries, with little focus on other injuries. This scoping review describes the current state of knowledge on paediatric vascular injuries in the upper and lower limbs, excluding injuries related to supracondylar humeral fractures. METHODS: MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies evaluating the epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of upper and lower limb vascular trauma in those aged under 18 years. Studies related to supracondylar humeral fractures were excluded. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for Scoping Reviews was used. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies was included, all of which were retrospective, and 74% of which were based in North America or Europe. Extremity vascular trauma was reported to cause 0.6 - 4.4% of all paediatric trauma admissions, with penetrating mechanisms and upper limb injuries being the most common. Operative intervention was reported in 80 - 100% of children in the included studies. Primary repair was the most commonly reported operative intervention, followed by interposition graft and bypass graft. Synthetic graft use was less commonly reported (incidence range 0.5 - 33%). Lower limb fasciotomies and amputations were not commonly reported (incidence range 0 - 23% and 0 - 13%, respectively). The mortality rate appeared low, with 23 studies reporting no deaths (incidence range 0 - 4%). Complications were reported inconsistently, with no uniform outcome or follow up measures used. CONCLUSION: The incidence of extremity vascular trauma appears low in children, with penetrating mechanisms and upper extremity injuries appearing to dominate. Most studies are from high income countries, with probable selection bias towards those treated by operative intervention. Prospective studies are required focusing on patterns of injury, rates of operative and endovascular intervention, and long term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Humanos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidad , Niño , Adolescente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Preescolar , Lactante , Extremidad Superior/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Superior/lesiones , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 58(6): 581-587, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38284809

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic axillary and subclavian artery injuries are uncommon. Limited data are available regarding patient and injury characteristics, as well as management strategies and outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on patients presenting to University of Louisville Hospital, an urban Level One Trauma Center, with traumatic axillary and subclavian artery injuries from 2015-2021. Patients were identified using University of Louisville trauma, radiology, and billing database searches based on ICD9/10 codes for axillary and subclavian artery injuries. Descriptive statistics are expressed as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons were performed using Fisher's Exact and Chi-squared tests. RESULTS: Forty-four patients with traumatic axillary-subclavian arterial injuries were identified for analysis. Blunt and penetrating trauma were equally represented (n = 22 for both). A variety of injury types were seen, including minimal/intimal injury, laceration, pseudoaneurysm, transection, occlusion, and arteriovenous fistula. Management strategies were also variable, including non-operative, endovascular, planned hybrid, open, and endovascular converted to open. In operative patients, revascularization technical success was high (n = 31, 97%) with low likelihood of thrombosis (n = 2, 6%) and no infections. Among all patients, amputation rate was 5% (n = 2) and mortality rate was 9% (n = 3). Regarding arterial involvement, blunt injury was more likely to affect the subclavian (n = 18) than the axillary artery (n = 6) (P = .04). No significant difference was seen in brachial plexus injury based on artery involved (subclavian = 9 vs axillary = 11, P = .14) or mechanism (blunt = 6 vs penetrating = 11, P = .22). Non-operative management was more likely with subclavian artery injury (n = 11) vs axillary artery injury (n = 1) (P = .008). There was no significant difference between decision for non-operative (blunt = 9, penetrating = 3) vs operative (blunt = 13, penetrating = 19) management based on mechanism (P = .09). Transection injury was associated with an open repair strategy (endovascular/hybrid = 1, open/endovascular to open conversion = 11, P = .0003). Of the three patients requiring endovascular to open conversion, two required amputation, which were the only two patients in the study undergoing amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Both open and endovascular/hybrid strategies are useful when treating traumatic axillary and subclavian artery injuries and are associated with high likelihood of revascularization technical success, with low rates of thrombosis or infection, when treated promptly at a trauma center with vascular specialists available. Transection injuries were most often treated with open revascularization. Patients undergoing amputation had blunt transection injuries to the subclavian artery and underwent endovascular to open conversion after failed attempts at endovascular revascularization.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Arteria Axilar , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteria Subclavia , Centros Traumatológicos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas no Penetrantes , Heridas Penetrantes , Humanos , Arteria Subclavia/lesiones , Arteria Subclavia/cirugía , Arteria Subclavia/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/mortalidad , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapia , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Arteria Axilar/lesiones , Arteria Axilar/cirugía , Arteria Axilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/mortalidad , Heridas Penetrantes/terapia , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Adulto Joven , Factores de Riesgo , Recuperación del Miembro , Hospitales Urbanos , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano , Adolescente , Bases de Datos Factuales
14.
J Vasc Surg ; 79(1): 11-14, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37742731

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Despite the significant number of trauma patients treated at level 2 trauma centers (L2TCs) in the United States, most of the literature describing vascular trauma is from level 1 trauma centers (L1TCs). Currently, trauma center designation criteria do not require vascular surgery as a necessary component service. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for all trauma patients with a vascular surgery consultation seen at our L2TC between 2013 and 2018. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and outcomes were collected and analyzed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 3062 trauma patients evaluated at our L2TC, 110 (3.6%) had a vascular surgery consultation. Operative intervention was performed in 35.2% of consults, and 1.0% of all trauma patients had a vascular intervention. Average age was 57 years, and the majority were male (n = 75; 68.2%). Mean Injury Severity Score was 12.0 ± 9.6, and blunt injury (n = 77; 87.5%) was more common than penetrating (n = 11; 12.5%). The most common location of injury was the lower extremity (n = 23; 74.2%), followed by upper extremity (n = 3; 9.7%), chest (n = 2; 6.5%), neck (n = 2; 6.5%), and pelvis (n = 1; 3.2%). Endovascular interventions were performed by the vascular surgery service in 67.7% (n = 21) of all injuries. There was one amputation (3.2%) and one postoperative mortality (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: At our L2TC, postoperative morbidity and mortality rates at 30 days were substantially lower compared with previously reported data. However, mean injury severity score and the incidence of penetrating and polytrauma were also lower at our institution. Most patients were managed nonoperatively, but when they did require an operation, endovascular therapies were more commonly implemented. Vascular surgery should be considered an integral service in trauma level designation, and there is a need for further investigation of these outcomes in L2TCs.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas Penetrantes , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Centros Traumatológicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Incidencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas Penetrantes/epidemiología , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo
15.
Knee ; 46: 34-40, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38061163

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Knee dislocations (KDs) are rare in orthopaedic trauma but can have devastating effects. Failing to diagnose a concomitant vascular injury can lead to amputation. Different methods are used for the diagnosis of a vascular injury and the best approach is under debate. This study aims to examine the risk factor(s) of vascular injury in patients with KDs, examine variables that differ between obese patients and non-obese patients with KDs, and analyse the modalities used to identify vascular injuries in the KD population. METHODS: The electronic patient medical record system at a major trauma centre was retrospectively reviewed to identify knee dislocations from 2015 to 2022. These were stratified based on age, gender, BMI, mechanism of injury, vascular injury, non-vascular complications, and laterality. Co-variates were inputted into a univariable regression analysis, followed by a multivariable regression analysis to identify risk factors of vascular injury in patients with knee dislocations. Co-variates were also compared between obese and non-obese patients using two-tailed t-tests for continuous variables and chi-squared test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Forty patients were identified with a KD, with twenty-eight males and twelve females. The average age was 42.9 years, seventeen patients had a BMI of thirty or over, and eleven patients (27.5%) had a vascular injury. Open injuries (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.19-11.30; p = 0.038) and obesity (OR: 2.66; 95% CI: 1.45-18.69; p = 0.027) are risk factors for vascular injury in patients with knee dislocation. Compared to non-obese patients, obese patients had a higher rate of open injury (p = 0.028), vascular injury (p = 0.017), low-energy injuries (p = 0.014), non-vascular complications (p = 0.017), and amputation (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Open injuries and obesity are risk factors for vascular injury in patients with KD. Compared to non-obese patients, obese patients have low-energy injuries and an increased rate of non-vascular complications, meaning that clinicians could err on the side of caution when investigating vascular injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.


Asunto(s)
Luxaciones Articulares , Luxación de la Rodilla , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/complicaciones , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Luxación de la Rodilla/complicaciones , Luxación de la Rodilla/epidemiología , Luxación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
16.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 29(11): 1255-1260, 2023 10 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37889033

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, risk factors, clinical presentation, and management of major vascular injuries during bariatric surgery, with a specific focus on the role of different access methods in abdominal cavity entry. METHODS: A nationwide survey was conducted among bariatric surgeons to assess the prevalence of major vascular injuries. A questionnaire was distributed to 365 surgeons through WhatsApp groups of two national bariatric surgery societies, with 76 surgeons completing the survey. The study population included general surgeons practicing bariatric surgery, and the questionnaire consisted of 12 questions. RESULTS: Among the participants, 16.9% reported experiencing a major vascular injury during bariatric surgery. The majority of injuries (75%) occurred at the trocar entrance, with the remaining cases during the dissection phase. Notably, 66.7% of surgeons used optical trocars for access, while 27.8% employed the Veress needle technique. Early detection varied, with 45% identifying the injury immediately and 30% recognizing it within three minutes. Most injuries (52.4%) were repaired laparoscopically, and only three surgeons sought assistance from cardiovascular surgeons. CONCLUSION: Vascular injuries are infrequent but potentially serious complications in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Understand-ing their incidence, timely recognition, and proper management are crucial to minimize adverse effects. The findings of this study shed light on the patterns of vascular injuries and the potential role of specific access methods, providing valuable insights for enhancing patient safety in bariatric surgery.


Asunto(s)
Cavidad Abdominal , Cirugía Bariátrica , Laparoscopía , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Humanos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/etiología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos/efectos adversos
17.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 31(1): 35, 2023 Jul 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37420263

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Violence due to firearms is a major global public health issue and vascular injuries from firearms are particularly lethal. The aim of this study was to analyse population-based epidemiology of firearm-related vascular injuries. METHODS: This was a retrospective nationwide epidemiological study including all patients with firearm injuries from the national Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2019. There were 71,879 trauma patients registered during the study period, of which 1010 patients were identified with firearm injuries (1.4%), and 162 (16.0%) patients with at least one firearm-related vascular injury. RESULTS: There were 162 patients admitted with 238 firearm-related vascular injuries, 96.9% men (n = 157), median age 26.0 years [IQR 22-33]. There was an increase in vascular firearm injuries over time (P < 0.005). The most common anatomical vascular injury location was lower extremity (41.7%) followed by abdomen (18.9%) and chest (18.9%). The dominating vascular injuries were common femoral artery (17.6%, 42/238), superficial femoral artery (7.1%, 17/238), and iliac artery (7.1%, 17/238). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg or no palpable radial pulse in the emergency department was seen in 37.7% (58/154) of patients. The most common vascular injuries in this cohort with hemodynamic instability were thoracic aorta 16.5% (16/97), femoral artery 10.3% (10/97), inferior vena cava 7.2% (7/97), lung vessels 6.2% (6/97) and iliac vessels 5.2% (5/97). There were 156 registered vascular surgery procedures including vascular suturing (22%, 34/156) and bypass/interposition graft (21%, 32/156). Endovascular stent was placed in five patients (3.2%). The 30-day and 90-day mortality was 29.9% (50/162) and 33.3% (54/162), respectively. Most deaths (79.6%; 43/54) were within 24-h of injury. In the multivariate regression analysis, vascular injury to chest (P < 0.001) or abdomen (P = 0.002) and injury specifically to thoracic aorta (P < 0.001) or femoral artery (P = 0.022) were associated with 24-h mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Firearm-related vascular injuries caused significant morbidity and mortality. The lower extremity was the most common injury location but vascular injuries to chest and abdomen were most lethal. Improved early hemorrhage control strategies seem critical for better outcome.


Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Femenino , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización
18.
Am J Emerg Med ; 71: 117-122, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37379619

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Blunt cervical vascular injury (BCVI) is a non-penetrating trauma to the carotid and/or vertebral vessels following a direct injury to the neck or by the shearing of the cervical vessels. Despite its potentially life-threatening nature, important clinical features of BCVI such as typical patterns of co-occurring injuries for each trauma mechanism are not well known. To address this knowledge gap, we described the characteristics of patients with BCVI to identify the pattern of co-occurring injuries by common trauma mechanisms. METHODS: This is a descriptive study using a Japanese nationwide trauma registry from 2004 through 2019. We included patients aged ≥13 years presenting to the emergency department (ED) with BCVI, defined as a blunt trauma to any of the following vessels: common/internal carotid artery, external carotid artery, vertebral artery, external jugular vein, and internal jugular vein. We delineated characteristics of each BCVI classified according to three damaged vessels (common/internal carotid artery, vertebral artery, and others). In addition, we applied network analysis to unravel patterns of co-occurring injuries among patients with BCVI by four common trauma mechanisms (car accident, motorcycle/bicycle accident, simple fall, and fall from a height). RESULTS: Among 311,692 patients who visited the ED for blunt trauma, 454 (0.1%) patients had BCVI. Patients with common/internal carotid artery injuries presented to the ED with severe symptoms (e.g., the median Glasgow Coma Scale was 7) and had high in-hospital mortality (45%), while patients with vertebral artery injuries presented with relatively stable vital signs. Network analysis showed that head-vertebral-cervical spine injuries were common across four trauma mechanisms (car accident, motorcycle/bicycle accident, simple fall, and fall from a height), with co-occurring injuries of the cervical spine and vertebral artery being the most common injuries due to falls. In addition, common/internal carotid artery injuries were associated with thoracic and abdominal injuries in patients with car accidents. CONCLUSIONS: Based on analyses of a nationwide trauma registry, we found that patients with BCVI had distinct patterns of co-occurring injuries by four trauma mechanisms. Our observations provide an important basis for the initial assessment of blunt trauma and could support the management of BCVI.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas , Traumatismos Cerebrovasculares , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas no Penetrantes , Humanos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas/epidemiología , Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas/complicaciones , Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico , Arteria Vertebral/lesiones , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 31(1): 30, 2023 Jun 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37337265

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Civilian public mass shootings (CPMSs) are a major public health issue and in recent years several events have occurred worldwide. The aim of this systematic review was to characterize injuries and mortality after CPMSs focusing on in-hospital management of hemorrhage and vascular injuries. METHOD: A systematic review of all published literature was undertaken in Medline, Embase and Web of Science January 1st, 1968, to February 22nd, 2021, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature was eligible for inclusion if the CPMS included three or more people shot, injured or killed, had vascular injuries or hemorrhage. RESULTS: The search identified 2884 studies; 34 were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. There were 2039 wounded in 45 CPMS events. The dominating anatomic injury location per event was the extremity followed by abdomen and chest. The median number of operations and operated patients per event was 22 (5-101) and 10.5 (4-138), respectively. A total of 899 deaths were reported with a median mortality rate of 36.1% per event (15.9-71.4%) Thirty-eight percent (13/34) of all studies reported on vascular injuries. Vascular injuries ranged from 8 to 29%; extremity vascular injury the most frequent. Specific vascular injuries included thoracic aorta 18% (42/232), carotid arteries 6% (14/232), and abdominal aorta 5% (12/232). Vascular injuries were involved in 8.3%-10% of all deaths. CONCLUSION: This systematic review showed an overall high mortality after CPMS with injuries mainly located to the extremities, thorax and abdomen. About one quarter of deaths was related to hemorrhage involving central large vessel injuries. Further understanding of these injuries, and structured and uniform reporting of injuries and treatment protocols may help improve evaluation and management in the future. Level of Evidence Systematic review and meta-analysis, level III.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Humanos , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Hemorragia/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/terapia
20.
Injury ; 54(7): 110772, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37149441

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ballistic injuries to the upper extremity represent a small subset of injuries, and there is little data to provide guidance on management and outcomes. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of neurovascular injuries, compartment syndrome, and early postoperative infection, as well as patient and injury factors predictive of neurovascular injury following ballistic fractures of the forearm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of operatively treated ballistic forearm fractures at a single level I trauma center between 2010 and 2022 was performed. Thirty-three patients with 36 forearm fractures were identified. Only diaphyseal injuries in patients greater than 18 years old were included. Medical and radiographic records were reviewed to identify pre-injury patient-specific factors, including age, sex, smoking status, and history of diabetes. Injury characteristics, including the type of firearm used, forearm fracture location, and any associated neurologic or vascular injury, as well as compartment syndrome, were collected and analyzed. Short-term outcomes such as post-operative infection and recovery of neurologic function were also collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The median age was 27 years (range: 18-62), with a majority of male patients (78.8%, n = 26). 4 patients (12.1%) sustained high-energy injuries. 4 patients (12.1%) were found to have compartment syndrome pre-operatively or intra-operatively. 11 patients (33.3%) had nerve palsies postoperatively with 8 patients (24.2%) continuing to have nerve palsies at their final follow-up (mean follow-up= 149.9 +/- 187.2 days). The median length of stay was 4 days. There were no patients with infection at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Ballistic forearm fractures are complex injuries and can result in severe complications such as neurovascular injury and compartment syndrome. As such, a comprehensive evaluation and appropriate management of ballistic forearm fractures are essential to minimize the risk of severe complications and optimize patient outcomes. In our experience, when treated operatively, these injuries have a low rate of infection.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes Compartimentales , Traumatismos del Antebrazo , Fracturas Óseas , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Adolescente , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/complicaciones , Antebrazo , Centros Traumatológicos , Incidencia , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Traumatismos del Antebrazo/epidemiología , Traumatismos del Antebrazo/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndromes Compartimentales/epidemiología , Síndromes Compartimentales/etiología , Síndromes Compartimentales/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA