Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 9.441
Filtrar
1.
J. optom. (Internet) ; 17(3): [100497], jul.-sept2024. graf, tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-231871

RESUMEN

Purpose: To compare the eye defocus curves (DCs) obtained with stimuli on red, green, and white backgrounds and to investigate the applicability of the duochrome test (DT) in different age groups. Methods: 12 elderly (ELD: 59.3 ± 3.9 years) and 8 young (YG: 22.1 ± 1.1 years) subjects were recruited. An optometric assessment with the DT was carried out to obtain the subjective refraction at distance. DCs at distance on green, white, and red backgrounds were measured and the following parameters were deduced: dioptric difference between red-green, green-white, red-white focal positions (minima of the DCs), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and widths of the DCs for red, green, and white. Results: The DC difference between the green-white focal positions (mean ± standard deviation) was -0.12±0.17 diopters (D) (ELD, p = 0.012) and -0.11±0.12 D (YG, p = 0.039), while the red-white difference was not statistically significant. The DC red-green difference was 0.20±0.16 D (ELD, p = 0.002) and 0.18±0.18 D (YG, p = 0.008). The ELD BCVA with green background was significantly worse than BCVA with red (p = 0.007) and white (p = 0.007). The mean value of the DC's width in ELD for green (1.01±0.36 D) was higher than for red (0.77±0.21 D) and for white (0.84±0.35 D), but with no statistical significance. Conclusion: Both age groups showed a slight focusing preference for red when using white light. Moreover, ELD showed a worse BCVA with a green compared to a red background. Despite these results deduced by DC analyses, these aspects do not compromise the possibility of using the DT in clinical practice both in the young and in the elderly. Furthermore, the difference of about 0.20 D between red-green DC in both groups confirms the clinical appropriateness of the widespread use of 0.25 D step as the standard minimum difference in power between correcting lenses.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Visión Ocular , Agudeza Visual , Fondo de Ojo , Lentes de Contacto , Pruebas de Visión
2.
J. optom. (Internet) ; 17(3): [100514], jul.-sept2024. tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-231876

RESUMEN

Purpose: To analyze binocular vision of individuals aged 18 to 35 years diagnosed with keratoconus, utilizing spectacles and rigid gas-permeable (RGP) contact lenses. Research was led by the Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México and Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina Pereira, Colombia. Methods: A single center, prospective non-randomized, comparative, interventional, open-label study, in which the differences in binocular vision performance with both spectacles and RGP contact lenses was carried out from December 2018 to December 2019. Sampling was performed according to consecutive cases with keratoconus that met the inclusion criteria until the proposed sample size was reached. Results: Rigid gas-permeable (RGP) contact lenses notably enhanced distance and near visual acuity in keratoconus patients compared to spectacles. Visual alignment analysis shows exophoria at both distances and is slightly higher with RGP contact lenses. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05), with 82.5 % presenting compensated phoria with spectacles and pnly 42.50% with RGP contact lenses. Stereoscopic vision improved while wearing RGP contact lenses (42.59 %), although accommodation and accommodative flexibility remained within normal ranges. Conclusions: Patients with keratoconus fitted with RGP contact lenses have improved binocular vision skills such as visual acuity, stereopsis, and accommodative flexibility. However, even when the vergence and motor system is decompensated with respect to normal ranges, the range between break and recovery points for both fusional reserves and the near point of convergence (NPC) improves with the use of RGP contact lenses, giving indications of an adaptive condition of the motor system from the medium to the long term.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Queratocono , Anteojos , Lentes de Contacto , Visión Binocular , Pruebas de Visión , Colombia , México , Oftalmología , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Vestn Oftalmol ; 140(4): 98-103, 2024.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39254397

RESUMEN

Keratoplasty is a radical surgical method for treating various corneal pathologies. Today, there are many types of keratoplasty, each aiming to restore the integrity and transparency of the cornea. However, keratoplasty-induced ametropia often prevents achieving high visual acuity and makes impossible the use of conventional optical correction methods such as glasses or soft and traditional rigid contact lenses. In this regard, the use of scleral contact lenses is the most optimal method for optical correction of postoperative refractive anomalies, ensuring successful visual rehabilitation and preventing the need for additional keratorefractive interventions.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Trasplante de Córnea/métodos , Trasplante de Córnea/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Córnea/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Córnea/etiología , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Errores de Refracción/etiología , Errores de Refracción/terapia , Errores de Refracción/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Queratoplastia Penetrante/métodos , Queratoplastia Penetrante/efectos adversos
4.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 21564, 2024 09 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39284824

RESUMEN

A single-center prospective cohort study was conducted to investigate whether intraocular pressure (IOP)-related 24-h contact lens sensor (CLS) profile parameters can help predict glaucoma progression in patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). CLS measurements (Triggerfish; SENSIMED, Etagnières, Switzerland) at baseline without medication were performed for 24 h in one eye, following diurnal IOP measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry at 3-h intervals. Glaucoma progression during the follow-up period of ≥ 2 years was determined based on the Guided Progression Analysis of Humphrey visual fields and/or structural progression using fundus photographs. Among 79 patients (mean values: follow-up periods, 48.1 months; age, 51.5 years; baseline IOP, 14.0 mmHg; mean deviation, - 6.04 dB), 23 showed glaucoma progression. A smaller standard deviation of nocturnal ocular pulse amplitude in the CLS profile, a larger range of diurnal IOP at baseline, and the presence of optic disc hemorrhage (DH) during the study period were significant risk factors for glaucoma progression in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (hazard ratio, 0.30/mVeq, 1.23/mmHg, and 4.37/presence of DH; P = 0.016, 0.017, and 0.001, respectively). CLS measurements may be useful for assessing the risk of future glaucoma progression in patients with NTG, providing supplementary information to routine IOP measurements.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Presión Intraocular , Glaucoma de Baja Tensión , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Glaucoma de Baja Tensión/fisiopatología , Presión Intraocular/fisiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Tonometría Ocular/métodos , Anciano , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Campos Visuales/fisiología
5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 9: CD015751, 2024 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39234924

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contact lens discomfort is a symptom-based clinical diagnosis that affects 13% to 75% of contact lens wearers. The Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society defines contact lens discomfort as "a condition characterized by episodic or persistent adverse ocular sensations related to lens wear either with or without visual disturbance, resulting from reduced compatibility between the lens and ocular environment, which can lead to decreased wearing time and discontinuation from lens wear." Signs of the condition include conjunctival hyperemia, corneal and conjunctival staining, altered blinking patterns, lid wiper epitheliopathy, and meibomian gland dysfunction. Eye care specialists often treat contact lens discomfort with lubricating drops, including saline, although there is no clear evidence showing this treatment is effective and safe. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lubricating drops for ocular discomfort associated with contact lens wear in adults. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register), MEDLINE, Embase.com, two other databases, and two trials registries to May 2024, without date or language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated lubricating drops, including saline, versus no treatment, or that evaluated lubricating drops versus saline, in adult contact lens wearers. We included studies regardless of publication status, language, or year of publication. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We applied standard Cochrane methodology. The critical outcome was contact lens discomfort. Important outcomes were corneal fluorescein staining and conjunctival redness. Adverse outcomes were incident microbial keratitis, inflammatory corneal infiltrates, and participant discontinuation. We assessed risk of bias for outcomes reported in the summary of findings table using the Cochrane risk of bias tool RoB 2, and we rated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included seven RCTs conducted in the USA, Canada, Italy, and France. They randomized a total of 463 participants to lubricating drops, saline, or no treatment. Four trials evaluated lubricating drops and saline versus no treatment, but one of them provided no usable outcome data. Three trials evaluated lubricating drops versus saline. Study characteristics All trial participants were adults, and the mean age ranged from 25.7 years to 36.7 years. The proportion of women varied from 15% to 82%. The trials lasted between one and four weeks. Of the five trials that reported contact lens discomfort, we judged three at high risk of bias, and considered the other two had some risk of bias concerns. Lubricating drops (including saline) versus no treatment Lubricating drops compared with no treatment may reduce contact lens discomfort, measured on a 37-point scale (lower is better), but the evidence is very uncertain (mean difference [MD] -5.9 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.74 to -8.05; 2 RCTs; 119 participants). One trial found no difference between lubricating drops and no treatment in "end-of-day" comfort. The trial that compared saline with no treatment provided no results for the control group. Two studies measured corneal fluorescein staining on a scale of 0 to 20 (lower is better). We found low-certainty evidence of little to no difference between lubricating drops and no treatment in changes in the extent (MD -0.15 points, 95% CI -0.86 to 0.56; 2 RCTs; 119 participants), depth (MD -0.01 points, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.42; 2 RCTs; 119 participants), or type (MD 0.04 points, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.46; 2 RCTs; 119 participants) of corneal fluorescein staining scores. Regarding conjunctival redness, measured on a scale of 0 to 4 (lower is better), there was low-certainty evidence of little to no difference between lubricating drops and no treatment in nasal region scores (MD 0.10, 95% CI -0.29 to 0.49; 1 RCT; 73 participants) and temporal region scores (MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.39; 1 RCT; 73 participants). No studies reported microbial keratitis or inflammatory corneal infiltrates, and no trials reported vision-threatening adverse events up to four weeks of treatment. All trials reported the proportion of participants who discontinued participation. In two trials, no participants left any treatment group. Our meta-analysis of another two studies suggests little difference in the number of people who dropped out of the lubricating treatment group versus the no treatment group (risk ratio [RR] 1.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 10.94; 138 participants; low-certainty evidence). Lubricating drops versus saline Lubricating drops may have little to no effect compared with saline on contact lens discomfort measured on a visual analog scale of 0 to 100 (lower is better), but the evidence is very uncertain (MD 9.5 points, 95% CI -4.65 to 23.65; 1 RCT; 39 participants). No studies reported corneal fluorescein staining or conjunctival redness. No studies reported microbial keratitis or inflammatory corneal infiltrates, and no trials reported vision-threatening adverse events up to four weeks of treatment. Our meta-analysis of three studies suggests little difference in the number of people who dropped out of the lubricating treatment group versus the saline group (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.47 to 5.12; 269 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Very low-certainty evidence suggests that lubricating drops may improve contact lens discomfort compared with no treatment, but may have little or no effect on contact lens discomfort compared with saline. Low-certainty evidence also suggests that lubricating drops may have no unwanted effects that would lead to discontinuation over one to four weeks. Current evidence suggests that prescribing lubricating drops (including saline) to people with contact lens discomfort is a viable option. However, most studies did not assess patient-reported contact lens (dis)comfort using a validated instrument. Therefore, further well-designed trials are needed to generate high-certainty evidence on patient-reported outcomes as well as on longer-term safety outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto , Gotas Lubricantes para Ojos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adulto , Humanos , Parpadeo , Enfermedades de la Conjuntiva/etiología , Lentes de Contacto/efectos adversos , Hiperemia , Gotas Lubricantes para Ojos/uso terapéutico , Gotas Lubricantes para Ojos/administración & dosificación , Lubricantes/uso terapéutico , Lubricantes/administración & dosificación , Disfunción de la Glándula de Meibomio/terapia , Soluciones Oftálmicas/uso terapéutico , Solución Salina/administración & dosificación , Solución Salina/uso terapéutico
6.
Biomater Adv ; 164: 213990, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39154560

RESUMEN

Microbial keratitis associated with contact lenses (CLs) wear remains a significant clinical concern. Antibiotic therapy is the current standard of care. However, the emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens necessitates the investigation of alternative strategies. Antibiotic-free antimicrobial contact lenses (AFAMCLs) represent a promising approach in this regard. The effectiveness of CLs constructed with a variety of antibiotic-free antimicrobial strategies against microorganisms has been demonstrated. However, the impact of these antimicrobial strategies on CLs biocompatibility remains unclear. In the design and development of AFAMCLs, striking a balance between robust antimicrobial performance and optimal biocompatibility, including safety and wearing comfort, is a key issue. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in AFAMCLs technology. The focus is on the antimicrobial efficacy and safety of various strategies employed in AFAMCLs construction. Furthermore, this review investigates the potential impact of these strategies on CLs parameters related to wearer comfort. This review aims to contribute to the continuous improvement of AFAMCLs and provide a reference for the trade-off between resistance to microorganisms and wearing comfort. In addition, it is hoped that this review can also provide a reference for the antimicrobial design of other medical devices.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos , Humanos , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Materiales Biocompatibles/farmacología , Lentes de Contacto/microbiología , Lentes de Contacto/efectos adversos , Queratitis/microbiología , Queratitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
7.
Transl Vis Sci Technol ; 13(8): 28, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39150716

RESUMEN

Purpose: To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for contact lens (CL)-related subjective responses and explore whether MCID values differ between subjective responses and study designs. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of data from seven one-week bilateral crossover studies and 14 one-day contralateral CL studies. For comfort, dryness, vision, or ease of insertion, participants rated on a 0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS) and indicated lens preference on a five-point Likert scale featuring strong, slight, and no preferences. For each criterion, four MCID estimates were calculated and averaged: mean VAS score difference for "slight preference," lower limit of 95% confidence interval VAS score difference for "slight preference," difference in mean VAS score difference between "slight" and "no preference" and 0.5 standard deviation of VAS scores. Results: The four calculation methods generated a small range of MCID values. For bilateral studies, the averaged MCID was 7.2 (range 5.4-8.8) for comfort, 8.1 (5.2-10.6) for dryness, 7.1 (5.5-9.3) for vision and 7.6 (6.0-10.5) for ease of insertion. For contralateral studies, the averaged MCID was 6.9 (6.1-7.6) for comfort at insertion and 7.5 (6.8-8.2) for end-of-day comfort. Conclusions: This work demonstrated very similar MCID values across subjective responses and study designs, in a population of habitual soft CL wearers. In all cases, MCID values were on average seven units on a 0 to 100 VAS. Translational Relevance: This work provides MCID values which are important for interpreting ocular subjective responses and planning clinical studies.


Asunto(s)
Estudios Cruzados , Diferencia Mínima Clínicamente Importante , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Escala Visual Analógica , Lentes de Contacto , Satisfacción del Paciente , Lentes de Contacto Hidrofílicos , Anciano , Comodidad del Paciente/métodos
8.
Med Pr ; 75(4): 383-390, 2024 Sep 17.
Artículo en Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39189303

RESUMEN

Amendment to the Regulation of Minister of Labour and Social Policy of 1 December 1998 on safety and occupational hygiene at positions equipped with display monitors, adopted on October 18th, 2023, entered the long-awaited by employees possibility of reimbursement for corrective contact lenses, adjusting the Polish legislation to European directive regulating working conditions with display screen equipment. Contact lenses in many cases of refractive errors can be an alternative to prescription glasses method of correcting the visual impairment. There are however many clinical conditions, in which contact lenses can provide a better corrective effect on visual acuity. The information contained in medical databases of articles and scientific journals (PubMed, Biblioteka Nauki), online publications (Lippincott Journals), books, applicable legal regulations (available in Internetowy System Aktów Prawnych) and guidelines published by organizations and associations (Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine in Lódz, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society) were analyzed, covering the discussed issues over the years 2000-2023. Non-correction or suboptimal correction of a refractive error can cause a wide variety of troublesome symptoms, such as eye pain, headache, double vision, balance disorders, nausea, disturbances in the perception of the surroundings, contributing to poorer work efficiency, faster fatigue or an increased risk of error. This article, which is a narrative review, aims to present these conditions, as well as provide a brief overview of the types of contact lenses used, complications that may result from their use and contraindications to the use of this type of correction. Med Pr Work Health Saf. 2024;75(4):383-390.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto , Errores de Refracción , Humanos , Errores de Refracción/terapia , Polonia , Lugar de Trabajo , Salud Laboral , Trastornos de la Visión , Agudeza Visual , Condiciones de Trabajo
9.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 24(1): 365, 2024 Aug 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39180002

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bandage contact lenses are important aids for aftercare following ocular surgery and for a wide variety of ocular surface conditions. However, bandage contact lenses also bear the risk of fostering microbial infections of the cornea. We herein report the safety profile of bandage contact lenses from a comprehensive review of medical records in a tertiary care eye hospital in Germany. METHODS: We identified 638 consecutive patients who had been prescribed at least one bandage lens during the past 10 years. For these, we performed a computerized search for the following adverse events: (1) endophthalmitis, (2) emergency keratoplasty and (3) vision loss of at least 2 lines according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS). We manually assessed the relatedness of each event to the bandage lens. Events later than 100 days following the bandage lens prescription were not considered to be related to bandage contact lenses. RESULTS: We observed 267 adverse events, with 120 occurring within 100 days after bandage lens prescription. This left a total of 18 endophthalmitis events, 21 penetrating keratoplasties and 81 eyes with vision loss of at least 2 ETDRS lines (for individual review of relatedness). Only two episodes of endophthalmitis could be linked to bandage lens wear. All other adverse events were due to causative conditions that had already been present prior to bandage contact lens insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Severe adverse events after bandage contact lens wear are not uncommon because lenses are used in patients suffering from preexisting ocular conditions. However, severe adverse events were almost never caused by the bandage contact lenses directly in our hands. We therefore conclude that bandage contact lenses are safe given proper ophthalmological supervision.


Asunto(s)
Vendajes , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Endoftalmitis/etiología , Endoftalmitis/terapia , Agudeza Visual , Lentes de Contacto/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Alemania/epidemiología
10.
Mycopathologia ; 189(5): 74, 2024 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39107598

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mycotic keratitis (MK) represents a corneal infection, with Fusarium species identified as the leading cause. Fusarium is a genus of filamentous fungi commonly found in soil and plants. While many Fusarium species are harmless, some can cause serious infections in humans and animals, particularly Fusarium keratitis, that can lead to severe ocular infections, prevalent cause of monocular blindness in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Due to its incidence and importance in ophthalmology, we conducted a systematic analysis of clinical cases to increase our understanding of Fusarium keratitis by gathering clinical and demographic data. METHODS: To conduct an analysis of Fusarium keratitis, we looked through the literature from the databases PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, and Google Scholar and found 99 papers that, between March 1969 and September 2023, corresponded to 163 cases of Fusarium keratitis. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed the Fusarium solani species complex as the predominant isolate, with females disproportionately affected by Fusarium keratitis. Notably, contact lens usage emerged as a significant risk factor, implicated in nearly half of cases. Diagnosis primarily relied on culture, while treatment predominantly involved topical natamycin, amphotericin B, and/or voriconazole. Surprisingly, our findings demonstrated a prevalence of cases originating from the United States, suggesting potential underreporting and underestimation of this mycosis in tropical regions. This shows the imperative for heightened vigilance, particularly in underdeveloped regions with substantial agricultural activity, where Fusarium infections may be more prevalent than currently reported. CONCLUSION: Our study sheds light on the clinical complexities of Fusarium keratitis and emphasizes the need for further research and surveillance to effectively tackle this vision-threatening condition. Furthermore, a timely identification and early initiation of antifungal treatment appear to be as important as the choice of initial treatment itself.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos , Fusariosis , Fusarium , Queratitis , Humanos , Queratitis/microbiología , Queratitis/epidemiología , Queratitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Fusarium/aislamiento & purificación , Fusarium/clasificación , Fusarium/genética , Fusariosis/microbiología , Fusariosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Fusariosis/epidemiología , Fusariosis/diagnóstico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/microbiología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/epidemiología , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Voriconazol/uso terapéutico , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lentes de Contacto/microbiología , Lentes de Contacto/efectos adversos , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Natamicina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Adolescente
12.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 44(6): 1053-1057, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39031707

RESUMEN

John Lennon has an enduring, instantly recognisable, iconic, spectacle look. However, prior to 1966, he was rarely seen wearing glasses in public. From ages 7 to 26, he effectively hid his myopia away, including a period of unsuccessful contact lens wear during Beatlemania. This narrative review examines John's experience with contact lenses from 1963 to 1966 when he wore corneal rigid lenses made from polymethylmethacrylate, which regularly fell out. This frequent lens ejection was most likely due to the interaction between his upper eyelid and a spherical back surface rigid lens fitted to his right eye, which had a moderate degree of with-the-rule corneal astigmatism. John's recollection that his contact lenses stayed in place while 'stoned' supports this hypothesis, as a cannabis-induced upper eyelid ptosis would reduce the likelihood of lens ejection.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto , Miopía , Humanos , Lentes de Contacto/efectos adversos , Miopía/fisiopatología , Miopía/terapia , Historia del Siglo XX , Masculino
13.
Eye Contact Lens ; 50(9): 384-394, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968599

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate changes in objective vision quality in mesopic environments in teenagers with myopia after wearing orthokeratology (OK) lenses. METHODS: This prospective clinical study included 45 patients (80 eyes) who received OK lenses at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University from March 2021 to September 2021. An Optical Path Difference-Scan III refractive power/corneal analyzer was used to determine the corneal topographic parameters (corneal e, corneal Q, surface asymmetry index (SAI), and surface regularity index (SRI)), higher-order aberrations (HOAs), axial length (AL) change, lens decentration, induced astigmatism, target power, and Strehl ratio (SR) in a mesopic visual environment after wearing OK lenses for 6 months. In addition, corneal morphological parameters, HOAs, and SR were analyzed in a mesopic visual environment. Finally, we investigated the correlations among corneal morphology, HOAs, AL change, lens decentration, induced astigmatism, and SR. RESULTS: The SAI value was significantly higher ( P <0.01), and the corneal e was significantly lower ( P <0.01), in a mesopic visual environment after wearing OK lenses for 1 week than baseline. A significant increase was observed in total HOAs and spherical aberrations, compared with before the OK lenses were worn ( P <0.01). In addition, SR in the mesopic visual environment decreased significantly after wearing the lenses ( P <0.01). No significant differences were observed ( P >0.05) among the 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up findings. After 6 months, AL and lens decentration did not differ significantly compared with before ( P >0.05), whereas induced astigmatism significantly increased ( P <0.05). Negative correlations were observed between corneal Q, SAI, SRI, HOAs, induced astigmatism, and SR, and positive correlations were found between corneal e, AL change, lens decentration, and SR, after wearing OK lenses. KEY POINTS: • Wearing orthokeratology lenses significantly altered corneal morphology and HOAs in myopic teenagers within 1 week. • The changes that we observed in the eyes of adolescents with myopia after wearing orthokeratology lenses decreased vision quality in mesopic environments. • Strehl ratio is significantly correlated with multiple parameters, including HOAs, AL change, and lens decentration. CONCLUSIONS: In teenagers with myopia wearing OK lenses, significant changes in vision quality and corneal morphology were observed, leading to increased aberrations and affecting optical imaging quality. Furthermore, SR is significantly correlated with multiple parameters, including HOAs, AL change, and lens decentration. REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered with the United States Clinical Trials Registry under registration number NCT04929119.


Asunto(s)
Topografía de la Córnea , Miopía , Procedimientos de Ortoqueratología , Refracción Ocular , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Adolescente , Miopía/fisiopatología , Miopía/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Córnea/patología , Córnea/fisiopatología , Lentes de Contacto , Niño , Longitud Axial del Ojo/patología , Astigmatismo/fisiopatología , Astigmatismo/etiología
14.
Int J Pharm ; 662: 124505, 2024 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39059520

RESUMEN

Keratitis is a corneal infection caused by various bacteria and fungi. Eye drop treatment of keratitis involves significant challenges due to difficulties in administration, inefficiencies in therapeutic dosage, and frequency of drug applications. All these are troublesome and result in unsuccessful treatment, high cost, time loss, development of drug resistance by microorganisms, and a massive burden on human health and the healthcare system. Most of the antibacterial and antifungal medications are non-water-soluble and/or include toxic drug formulations. Here, the aim was to develop drug-loaded contact lenses with therapeutic dosage formulations and extended drug release capability as an alternative to eye drops, by employing supercritical carbon dioxide (ScCO2) as a drug impregnation solvent to overcome inefficient ophthalmic drug use. ScCO2, known as a green solvent, has very low viscosity which provides high mass transfer power and could enhance drug penetration into contact lenses much better with respect to drug loading using other solvents. Here, moxifloxacin (MOX) antibiotic and amphotericin B (AMB) antifungal medicines were separately loaded into commercially available silicone hydrogel contact lenses through 1) drug adsorption from the aqueous solutions and 2) impregnation techniques via ScCO2 and their efficacies were compared. Drug impregnation parameters, i.e., 8-25 MPa pressure, 310-320 K temperature, 2-16-hour impregnation times, and the presence of ethanol as polar co-solvent were investigated for the optimization of the ScCO2 drug impregnation process. The highest drug loading and long-term release kinetic from the contact lenses were obtained at 25 MPa and 313 K with 2.5 h impregnation time by using 1 % ethanol (by volume). Furthermore, antibacterial/antifungal activities of the MOX- and AMB-impregnated contact lenses were effective against in vitro Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 10145) bacteria and Fusarium solani (ATCC 36031) fungus for up to one week. Consequently, the ScCO2 method can be effectively used to impregnate commercial contact lenses with drugs, and these can then be safely used for the treatment of keratitis. This offers a sustainable delivery system at effective dosage formulations with complete bacterial/fungal inhibition and termination, making it viable for real animal/human applications.


Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B , Antibacterianos , Antifúngicos , Dióxido de Carbono , Queratitis , Moxifloxacino , Dióxido de Carbono/química , Queratitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Queratitis/microbiología , Antibacterianos/química , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antifúngicos/química , Antifúngicos/administración & dosificación , Moxifloxacino/administración & dosificación , Moxifloxacino/química , Moxifloxacino/farmacología , Anfotericina B/administración & dosificación , Anfotericina B/química , Anfotericina B/farmacología , Liberación de Fármacos , Lentes de Contacto/microbiología , Fusarium/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Hidrogeles/química , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Solventes/química , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Fúngicas del Ojo/microbiología
15.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 5635, 2024 Jul 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38965218

RESUMEN

The wearable contact lens that continuously monitors intraocular pressure (IOP) facilitates prompt and early-state medical treatments of oculopathies such as glaucoma, postoperative myopia, etc. However, either taking drugs for pre-treatment or delaying the treatment process in the absence of a neural feedback component cannot realize accurate diagnosis or effective treatment. Herein, a neuroprosthetic contact lens enabled sensorimotor system is reported, which consists of a smart contact lens with Ti3C2Tx Wheatstone bridge structured IOP strain sensor, a Ti3C2Tx temperature sensor and an IOP point-of-care monitoring/display system. The point-of-care IOP monitoring and warning can be realized due to the high sensitivity of 12.52 mV mmHg-1 of the neuroprosthetic contact lens. In vivo experiments on rabbit eyes demonstrate the excellent wearability and biocompatibility of the neuroprosthetic contact lens. Further experiments on a living rate in vitro successfully mimic the biological sensorimotor loop. The leg twitching (larger or smaller angles) of the living rat was demonstrated under the command of motor cortex controlled by somatosensory cortex when the IOP is away from the normal range (higher or lower).


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto , Presión Intraocular , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Animales , Presión Intraocular/fisiología , Conejos , Ratas , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Prótesis Neurales , Humanos , Retroalimentación Sensorial/fisiología
16.
Biointerphases ; 19(4)2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38984804

RESUMEN

Topical ophthalmic solutions (eye drops) are becoming increasingly popular in treating and preventing ocular diseases for their safety, noninvasiveness, and ease of handling. However, the static and dynamic barriers of eyes cause the extremely low bioavailability (<5%) of eye drops, making ocular therapy challenging. Thus, drug-eluting corneal contact lenses (DECLs) have been intensively investigated as a drug delivery device for their attractive properties, such as sustained drug release and improved bioavailability. In order to promote the clinical application of DECLs, multiple aspects, i.e., drug release and penetration, safety, and biocompatibility, of these drug delivery systems were thoroughly examined. In this review, we systematically discussed advances in DECLs, including types of preparation materials, drug-loading strategies, drug release mechanisms, strategies for penetrating ocular barriers, in vitro and in vivo drug delivery and penetration detection, safety, and biocompatibility validation methods, as well as challenges and future perspectives.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Soluciones Oftálmicas , Humanos , Animales , Córnea/metabolismo , Disponibilidad Biológica
17.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 44(6): 1224-1236, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38980216

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To optimise the precision and efficacy of orthokeratology, this investigation evaluated a deep neural network (DNN) model for lens fitting. The objective was to refine the standardisation of fitting procedures and curtail subjective evaluations, thereby augmenting patient safety in the context of increasing global myopia. METHODS: A retrospective study of successful orthokeratology treatment was conducted on 266 patients, with 449 eyes being analysed. A DNN model with an 80%-20% training-validation split predicted lens parameters (curvature, power and diameter) using corneal topography and refractive indices. The model featured two hidden layers for precision. RESULTS: The DNN model achieved mean absolute errors of 0.21 D for alignment curvature (AC), 0.19 D for target power (TP) and 0.02 mm for lens diameter (LD), with R2 values of 0.97, 0.95 and 0.91, respectively. Accuracy decreased for myopia of less than 1.00 D, astigmatism exceeding 2.00 D and corneal curvatures >45.00 D. Approximately, 2% of cases with unique physiological characteristics showed notable prediction variances. CONCLUSION: While exhibiting high accuracy, the DNN model's limitations in specifying myopia, cylinder power and corneal curvature cases highlight the need for algorithmic refinement and clinical validation in orthokeratology practice.


Asunto(s)
Topografía de la Córnea , Miopía , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Procedimientos de Ortoqueratología , Refracción Ocular , Humanos , Procedimientos de Ortoqueratología/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Miopía/terapia , Miopía/fisiopatología , Femenino , Masculino , Refracción Ocular/fisiología , Adolescente , Córnea/patología , Córnea/diagnóstico por imagen , Lentes de Contacto , Adulto Joven , Niño , Adulto , Agudeza Visual/fisiología
18.
Eye Contact Lens ; 50(7): 292-296, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39078501

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Scleral lenses (SLs) can be customized using traditional diagnostic lens fitting or by using image- and/or impression-based technologies. This study describes the availability and usage of SL fitting technology in patients with keratoconus. METHODS: An online survey queried practitioners on the mode of practice, country of residence, and estimated number of SL fits completed for keratoconus. Practitioners were asked whether they had access to image- and/or impression-based technology and to estimate the percentage of fits completed using diagnostic fitting, image-based technology, and impression-based technology. Access and usage of technology was compared between academic and community practices, United States and non-United States, and high-volume (≥60 SLs) and low-volume fitters. RESULTS: 423 practitioners who fit SL for keratoconus participated. Image- and impression-based technologies were more frequently available in academic practices compared with community practices and high-volume compared with low-volume practitioners ( P <0.005). Practitioners with image-based technology used it for a median [interquartile range] 5 [25]% of SL fittings; those with impression-based technology used it for 8 [9]% of fittings, and those with both types of technology used image-based devices for 12 [23]% of fittings and impression-based for 5 [8]% of fittings. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, most participants report using diagnostic lenses to fit SLs for patients with keratoconus.


Asunto(s)
Lentes de Contacto , Queratocono , Ajuste de Prótesis , Esclerótica , Queratocono/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
PLoS One ; 19(7): e0305102, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39052642

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Recreational runners who need refractive visual correction will need to choose the type of visual correction (spectacles, contact lenses, or no correction) to wear when running. The prevalence of correction choices and distinguishing demographic features associated with these choices of correction were investigated. METHODS: A 26-item online questionnaire covering demographics, running habits, and visual corrections used was answered by 941 people. Participants were aged 18 years or older, considered themselves a recreational runner and reported needing refractive correction for everyday life. Bivariate analyses and binary logistic regression were used to determine the variables independently associated with including or avoiding types of correction for running. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: Participants ran an average of 3.8times, 3.6hours, and 33.4km per week. Running habits were not associated with type of visual correction, suggesting that visual correction does not present a barrier to participating in recreational running. Solely using spectacles for running was the most common choice (38.8%) and they were worn for running at least sometimes by 65.8%. Fewer people wore spectacles for running than for general purposes (98.9%), suggesting spectacles have limitations for running. Spectacle wear for running was significantly associated with not having contact lenses available and longer duration of wearing visual correction. Running without correction was a common choice, with 15.5% of the sample only running without correction, and 26.2% running at least sometimes without their visual correction. Not wearing correction was significantly associated with not having contact lenses, a shorter duration of wearing visual correction, and a lower myopic refractive error. Contact lenses were the sole correction for running for 15.6% and were worn for running at least sometimes by 40.5%. Contact lenses were significantly more likely to be used by women and younger runners. Signposting runners to contact lenses if this has not previously been considered is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Anteojos , Carrera , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Carrera/fisiología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven , Recreación , Adolescente , Lentes de Contacto , Errores de Refracción/terapia , Anciano , Conducta de Elección
20.
J. optom. (Internet) ; 17(2): [100498], Abr-Jun, 2024. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-231627

RESUMEN

Objective: The high incidence of keratoconus has caused its management, etiology, and pathogenesis to be controversial topics in the ophthalmology field. This study aims to analyze the relationship between the different publications and authors through citation networks, as well as to identify the research areas and determine the most cited article. Methods: The search for publications was carried out through the Web of Science database, using the term “Keratoconus” between 1900 and December 2022. The Citation Network Explorer and CiteSpace software were used for the publication analysis. Results: 9,655 publications were found, with 124,379 citations generated on the network. The year with the highest number of publications was 2021. The most cited publication was “Keratoconus” by Rabinowitz, published in 1998. Cluster function gave five groups of research areas about keratoconus: corneal signs and parameters, cross-linking efficiency and effects, clinical factors, keratoplasty, and treatment. Conclusions: The citation network offers an objective and comprehensive analysis of the papers on keratoconus. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Córnea , Queratocono , Oftalmología , Lentes de Contacto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA