Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Jardinería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Marihuana Medicinal/provisión & distribución , Marihuana Medicinal/uso terapéutico , Programas Nacionales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Derechos del Paciente/legislación & jurisprudencia , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Several pieces of legislation passed in Cleveland, Ohio, from 2007 to 2011, focused on improving the city's food environment through urban agriculture initiatives. We used qualitative, case study methods, including interviews with 7 key informants, to examine the policy development process and investigate the role of the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Food Policy Coalition in developing and implementing 4 pieces of legislation. In this article, we focus on 2 pieces of legislation: zoning designation of an urban garden and allowance of small farm animals and bees on residential property. Five key themes emerged: impetus for policy came from community needs; education and raising awareness helped mitigate barriers; a cultural shift took place among policy makers; social connections and individual champions were needed; and concerns over food access and health influenced policy decisions. Legislative actions are important tools to influence the nutrition environment, as long as they are based on local needs and context.
Asunto(s)
Personal Administrativo , Agricultura/legislación & jurisprudencia , Jardinería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política Nutricional , Población Urbana , Personal Administrativo/psicología , Agricultura/educación , Agricultura/métodos , Animales , Abejas , Pollos , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria , Difusión de Innovaciones , Planificación Ambiental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/normas , Jardinería/educación , Jardinería/métodos , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Concesión de Licencias , Gobierno Local , Ohio , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Cultura Organizacional , Objetivos Organizacionales , Política Pública , Investigación Cualitativa , Características de la Residencia , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Red SocialRESUMEN
The life and death of California's Campaign Against Marijuana Planting (CAMP, 1983-2012) offers a unique analytical window into the time and space of the U.S. war on drugs in a global context. This paper draws on CAMP report archives, ethnographic interviews, and secondary data sources to locate the significance of CAMP, its demise, and enduring legacy for the political economy of domestic illicit cannabis production in southern Humboldt County, where it was initially focused. I first introduce the economic geography of cannabis production in southern Humboldt County and California. In the first part of the paper, using theoretical frameworks from Critical Geopolitics and International Relations, I examine the geo-politics of CAMP's emergence. In the second part of the paper, I examine industrial reterritorialization associated with its geographies of enforcement over time. I conclude by discussing the eclipse of its foundational logic-and-practice (policing the "Emerald Triangle") by new political and economic geographies of power.
Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos/economía , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Jardinería/economía , Jardinería/legislación & jurisprudencia , California , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos/historia , Jardinería/historia , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Política , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
A new international initiative for plant conservation was first called for as a resolution of the International Botanical Congress in 1999. The natural home for such an initiative was considered to be the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), and the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the CBD agreed to consider a Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (GSPC) at its 5th meeting in 2000. It was proposed that the GSPC could provide an innovative model approach for target setting within the CBD and, prior to COP5, a series of inter-sessional papers on proposed targets and their justification were developed by plant conservation experts. Key factors that ensured the adoption of the GSPC by the CBD in 2002 included: (1) ensuring that prior to and during COP5, key Parties in each region were supportive of the Strategy; (2) setting targets at the global level and not attempting to impose these nationally; and (3) the offer by Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) to support a GSPC position in the CBD Secretariat for 3 years, which provided a clear indication of the support for the GSPC from non-governmental organizations (NGO).
Asunto(s)
Biodiversidad , Botánica , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Ecosistema , Especies en Peligro de Extinción , Internacionalidad , Botánica/economía , Botánica/educación , Botánica/historia , Botánica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/economía , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/historia , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Especies en Peligro de Extinción/economía , Especies en Peligro de Extinción/historia , Especies en Peligro de Extinción/legislación & jurisprudencia , Jardinería/economía , Jardinería/educación , Jardinería/historia , Jardinería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Internacionalidad/historia , Internacionalidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Organizaciones/economía , Organizaciones/historia , Organizaciones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Pública/economía , Salud Pública/educación , Salud Pública/historia , Investigación/economía , Investigación/educación , Investigación/historiaRESUMEN
This article examines citizen participation in the governance of contemporary urban green space. Rather than exploring normative questions of ideal forms of participatory democracy, it focuses on changing roles and relationships between local state and non-state actors in order to identify and explain the changing nature of participation. I argue that neoliberal urban restructuring has changed the conditions for participation and thus participation itself in fundamental ways and that we need an account of changes in statehood and governance in order to capture this conceptually. Based on the case of community gardens in Berlin, the article discusses the extent to which this changed relationship is expressed by current citizen participation as well as the potential and problems that result from it. My empirical results show the emergence of a new political acceptance of autonomously organized projects and active citizen participation in urban green space governance. The central argument of this article is that this new acceptance can be conceptualized as an expression of the neoliberalization of cities. Nevertheless, this neoliberal strategy at the same time leads to complex and contradictory outcomes and the resulting benefits are also acknowledged.
Asunto(s)
Planificación de Ciudades , Participación de la Comunidad , Jardinería , Instalaciones Públicas , Salud Pública , Recreación , Berlin/etnología , Planificación de Ciudades/economía , Planificación de Ciudades/educación , Planificación de Ciudades/historia , Planificación de Ciudades/legislación & jurisprudencia , Participación de la Comunidad/economía , Participación de la Comunidad/historia , Participación de la Comunidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Participación de la Comunidad/psicología , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/economía , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/historia , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Jardinería/economía , Jardinería/educación , Jardinería/historia , Jardinería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Instalaciones Públicas/economía , Instalaciones Públicas/historia , Instalaciones Públicas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Pública/economía , Salud Pública/educación , Salud Pública/historia , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Recreación/economía , Recreación/fisiología , Recreación/psicología , Bienestar Social/economía , Bienestar Social/etnología , Bienestar Social/historia , Bienestar Social/legislación & jurisprudencia , Bienestar Social/psicología , Población Urbana/historiaRESUMEN
AIMS: To describe the development and enactment of the Western Australian (WA) Cannabis Infringement Notice scheme and reflect on the lessons for researchers and policy-makers interested in the translation of policy research to policy practice. METHODS: An insiders' description of the background research, knowledge transfer strategies and political and legislative processes leading to the enactment and implementation of the WA Cannabis Control Act 2003. Lenton and Allsop were involved centrally in the process as policy-researcher and policy-bureaucrat. RESULTS: In March 2004, Western Australia became the fourth Australian jurisdiction to adopt a 'prohibition with civil penalties' scheme for possession and cultivation of small amounts of cannabis. We reflect upon: the role of research evidence in the policy process; windows for policy change; disseminating findings when apparently no one is listening; the risks and benefits of the researcher as advocate; the differences between working on the inside and outside of government; and the importance of relationships, trust and track record. CONCLUSIONS: There was a window of opportunity and change was influenced by research that was communicated by a reliable and trusted source. Those who want to conduct research that informs policy need to understand the policy process more clearly, look for and help create emerging windows that occur in the problem and political spheres, and make partnerships with key stakeholders in the policy arena. The flipside of the process is that, when governments change, policy born in windows of opportunity can be a casualty.
Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Derecho Penal , Control de Medicamentos y Narcóticos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Política de Salud , Abuso de Marihuana/prevención & control , Políticas de Control Social/legislación & jurisprudencia , Jardinería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Formulación de Políticas , Australia OccidentalRESUMEN
Perhaps the world's first peace garden, the Cleveland Cultural Gardens embody the history of twentieth-century America and reveal the complex interrelations between art and place. This essay uses the Cleveland Cultural Gardens as a lens through which to explore how art and place have intersected over time. It explores how communities have negotiated questions of national, ethnic, and American identity and embedded those identities into the vernacular landscape. It considers how the particulars of place were embedded into a public garden and asks whether it is possible for public art to transcend its placeboth in terms of geography and history. In some sense, the Gardens have transcended their place, but in others respects, their fortunes were bound inextricably to that place, to the economic, demographic, and cultural contours that shaped and reshaped Northern Ohio. As works of art, the Cleveland Cultural Gardens both have reflected the history of Cleveland and American industrial cities during the 20th century and revealed something of the dynamics that underscored the changing character of public art and gardens in American cities.
Asunto(s)
Arte , Características Culturales , Jardinería , Instalaciones Públicas , Salud Urbana , Remodelación Urbana , Arte/historia , Ciudades/economía , Ciudades/etnología , Ciudades/historia , Ciudades/legislación & jurisprudencia , Características Culturales/historia , Salud Ambiental/economía , Salud Ambiental/educación , Salud Ambiental/historia , Salud Ambiental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Flores , Jardinería/economía , Jardinería/educación , Jardinería/historia , Jardinería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Ohio/etnología , Plantas , Instalaciones Públicas/economía , Instalaciones Públicas/historia , Instalaciones Públicas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Características de la Residencia/historia , Cambio Social/historia , Árboles , Salud Urbana/historia , Población Urbana/historia , Remodelación Urbana/economía , Remodelación Urbana/educación , Remodelación Urbana/historia , Remodelación Urbana/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
The effect on the cannabis market is one area of interest in the evaluation of the new 'prohibition with civil penalties' scheme for minor cannabis offences in WA. One goal of the scheme is to reduce the proportion of cannabis consumed that is supplied by large-scale suppliers that may also supply other drugs. As part of the pre-change phase of the evaluation, 100 regular (at least weekly) cannabis users were given a qualitative and quantitative interview covering knowledge and attitudes towards cannabis law, personal cannabis use, market factors, experience with the justice system and impact of legislative change. Some 85% of those who commented identified the changes as having little impact on their cannabis use. Some 89% of the 70 who intended to cultivate cannabis once the CIN scheme was introduced suggested they would grow cannabis within the two non-hydroponic plant-limit eligible for an infringement notice under the new law. Only 15% believed an increase in self-supply would undermine the large scale suppliers of cannabis in the market and allow some cannabis users to distance themselves from its unsavoury aspects. Only 11% said they would enter, or re-enter, the cannabis market as sellers as a result of the scheme introduction. Most respondents who commented believed that the impact of the legislative changes on the cannabis market would be negligible. The extent to which this happens will be addressed in the post-change phase of this research. Part of the challenge in assessing the impact of the CIN scheme on the cannabis market is that it is distinctly heterogeneous.
Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Comercio , Legislación de Medicamentos , Abuso de Marihuana/prevención & control , Periodicidad , Políticas de Control Social/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Jardinería/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Abuso de Marihuana/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Prevalencia , Muestreo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Australia Occidental/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
'Marginal deterrence' refers to deterrence of a more harmful act because its expected sanction exceeds that for a less harmful act. 'Legitimacy of the law' predicts that laws perceived as fair will generate compliance and laws perceived as unfair will generate defiance. The introduction of the Cannabis Infringement Notice (CIN) scheme in Western Australia provided an opportunity to test these theories by assessing whether perceptions of certainty, severity and fairness of punishments dictated by the CIN scheme would affect how regular cannabis users intended to obtain cannabis after legislative change. One hundred Perth residents (mean age 32.2 years; two-thirds male) who reported using cannabis at least once a week were given semi-structured interviews before the CIN scheme came into effect. There was limited opportunity for the CIN scheme to effect marginal deterrence, as most of the sample were already purchasing or growing within the lower penalty thresholds. However, of the minority who were purchasing and growing outside the CIN scheme, a significant proportion reported intending to change their behaviour to fit within the scheme, including the only purchaser of more than 30 g and six of 14 non-hydroponic growers of three or more plants. Perceived certainty, severity and fairness of penalties were not as important in determining purchasing and growing behaviour as factors such as 'meeting needs', 'cost' and 'preference'. The results suggest that under the CIN scheme, marginal deterrence and legitimacy will probably play only a small or selective role in decisions about obtaining cannabis, although in some areas, such as the numbers of non-hydroponic plants, marginal deterrence may be evident.