RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This retrospective real-world study compared overall survival (OS) between patients with BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) who received niraparib second-line maintenance (2LM) versus active surveillance (AS) using target trial emulation, cloning, inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) methodology to minimize immortal time bias. METHODS: Eligible patients from a United States-based, deidentified, electronic health record-derived database were diagnosed with epithelial OC (January 1, 2011-May 31, 2021), were BRCAwt, and completed second-line (2L) therapy (January 1, 2017-March 2, 2022). Patient data were cloned at index (2L last treatment date), assigned to niraparib 2LM and AS cohorts, and censored when treatment deviated from clone assignment. Follow-up was measured from index to earliest of study end (May 31, 2022), last activity, or death. Median OS (mOS) and hazard ratios were estimated from stabilized IPCW Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 199 patients received niraparib 2LM, and 707 had their care managed with AS. Key characteristics were balanced across cohorts after cloning and stabilized IPCW. Median follow-up was 15.6- and 9.3-months pre-cloning. IPCW mOS was 24.1 months (95% CI: 20.9-29.5) and 18.4 months (95% CI: 15.1-22.8) in niraparib 2LM and AS cohorts, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI: 0.66-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study provides supportive evidence of an OS benefit for patients with BRCAwt recurrent OC who received 2LM niraparib monotherapy compared with those whose care was managed with AS. The analytic strategies implemented were useful in minimizing immortal time bias and measured confounding.

Asunto(s)

Indazoles , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Humanos , Femenino , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/mortalidad , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Espera Vigilante , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer. METHODS: This was the follow-up analysis of a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in Japanese women with homologous recombination-deficient, platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had completed 3-4 lines of chemotherapy and were poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor naïve. Participants received niraparib (starting dose, 300 mg) once daily in continuous 28-day cycles until objective disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR), as assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Safety evaluations included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: 20 patients were enrolled in the study and included in both efficacy and safety analyses. Median total study duration was 759.5 days. Median dose intensity was 201.3 mg/day. Confirmed ORR was 60.0% (90% confidence interval [CI]=39.4-78.3); 2 patients had complete response and 10 patients had partial response. Median duration of response was 9.9 months (95% CI=3.9-26.9) and the disease control rate was 90.0% (95% CI=68.3-98.8). The most common TEAEs were anemia (n=15), nausea (n=12), and decreased platelet count (n=11). TEAEs leading to study drug dose reduction, interruption, or discontinuation were reported in 16 (80.0%), 15 (75.0%), and 2 patients (10.0%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The long-term efficacy and safety profile of niraparib was consistent with previous findings in the equivalent population in non-Japanese patients. No new safety signals were identified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759600.

Asunto(s)

Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Anciano , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Japón , Ftalazinas/efectos adversos , Ftalazinas/administración & dosificación , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Recombinación Homóloga , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Pueblos del Este de Asia

RESUMEN

Ovarian cancer stands as the third most prevalent gynecological malignancy. The advent of PARP inhibitors, particularly rucaparib, has revolutionized the landscape of advanced ovarian cancer treatment, demonstrating notable efficacy with minimal toxicity, especially in patients not previously exposed to PARP inhibitors. Rucaparib's precision-driven approach, targeting specific genetic mutations, disrupts DNA repair mechanisms, resulting in cytotoxic effects on neoplastic cells. This comprehensive review delves into the clinical efficacy and safety profile of rucaparib in recurrent ovarian cancer, showcasing its promising therapeutic approach. A systematic search of studies reporting rucaparib efficacy and safety, up to September 2023, was conducted across various reputable databases and sources. The meta-analysis of seven articles revealed a pooled objective response rate (ORR) of 0.331 (95% CI, 0.221-0.449; I2 = 92.4%), underscoring rucaparib's efficacy, particularly evident in the BRCA-mutated cohort. Rucaparib consistently outperformed controls in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety evaluations indicated that 98.7% of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with 61% being grade ≥3. Notable TEAEs included nausea (69.0%), fatigue (66.8%), vomiting (37.3%), and constipation (32.1%). Hematological concerns comprised anemia (47.9%), thrombocytopenia, elevated AST/ALT (37.3%), and serum creatinine levels (19.7%). Despite favourable outcomes, the rucaparib group recorded higher event rates across various metrics than controls. The findings underscore the need for meticulous monitoring and dose adjustments to optimize therapeutic outcomes and mitigate the increased risks associated with adverse events. International Prospective Register of Systematic Review Identifier: CRD42023459646.

Asunto(s)

Indoles , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Indoles/efectos adversos , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

The current focus of ovarian cancer (OC) research is the improvement of treatment options through maximising drug effectiveness. OC remains the fifth leading cause of cancer-induced mortality in women worldwide. In recent years, nanotechnology has revolutionised drug delivery systems. Nanoparticles may be utilised as carriers in gene therapy or to overcome the problem of drug resistance in tumours by limiting the number of free drugs in circulation and thereby minimising undesired adverse effects. Cell surface receptors, such as human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), folic acid (FA) receptors, CD44 (also referred to as homing cell adhesion molecule, HCAM), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are highly expressed in ovarian cancer cells. Generation of active targeting nanoparticles involves modification with ligands that recognise cell surface receptors and thereby promote internalisation by cancer cells. Several poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) are currently used for the treatment of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOC) or platinum-sensitive relapsed OC. However, PARP resistance and poor drug bioavailability are common challenges, highlighting the urgent need to develop novel, effective strategies for ovarian cancer treatment. This review evaluates the utility of nanoparticles in ovarian cancer therapy, with a specific focus on targeted approaches and the use of PARPi nanocarriers to optimise treatment outcomes.

Asunto(s)

Nanopartículas , Neoplasias Ováricas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacología , Nanopartículas/química , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Animales

RESUMEN

Fuzuloparib is a novel orally bioactive poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi), which was approved by the Chinese Regulatory Agency (CRA) in 2020 for the treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers. This study firstly presents a rapid and accurate ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method for analyzing the levels of fuzuloparib and its major metabolite (SHR165202), and to investigate drug-drug interaction between fuzuloparib and curcumin in vitro and in vivo studies. After protein precipitation with acetonitrile, mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile and 0.1 % formic acid with a gradient elution was used to successfully separate fuzuloparib, SHR165202 and talazoparib (internal standard, IS). The results indicated that fuzuloparib and SHR165202 had good linearity over the calibration range of 2-50 ng/mL and 1-20 ng/mL, respectively. The precision, accuracy, stability, matrix effect, and extraction recovery required for methodological validation all complied with the requirements of the Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidelines. In vitro microsome incubation experiments, curcumin exhibited inhibitory effect on fuzuloparib in both rat liver microsomes (RLM) and human liver microsomes (HLM) with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 10.54 µM and 47.64 µM, respectively, and the corresponding mechanism was non-competitive. Furthermore, the inhibitory mechanism of curcumin on fuzuloparib was validated through molecular docking. In pharmacokinetic experiments in rats, curcumin significantly altered the plasma exposure of fuzuloparib, resulting in significant increases in AUC(0-t) and Cmax of fuzuloparib and a significant decrease in CLz/F. Moreover, the metabolite SHR165202 showed significant increases in AUC(0-t), AUC(0-∞), Tmax and Cmax and a significant decrease in CLz/F. This further supports the notion that curcumin could inhibit the metabolism of fuzuloparib. Therefore, when co-administering fuzuloparib and curcumin in clinic, it is recommended to monitor plasma levels of fuzuloparib and pay close attention to adverse effects. If necessary, the dose of fuzuloparib needs to be reduced.

Asunto(s)

Curcumina , Cromatografía Líquida con Espectrometría de Masas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Animales , Ratas , Administración Oral , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión/métodos , Curcumina/administración & dosificación , Curcumina/farmacocinética , Interacciones Farmacológicas/fisiología , Cromatografía Líquida con Espectrometría de Masas/métodos , Microsomas Hepáticos/metabolismo , Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacocinética , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodos

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Patterns of disease recurrence on poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor maintenance therapy are unclear and may affect subsequent treatment. This ad hoc subgroup analysis of the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study evaluated patterns of initial recurrence in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). METHODS: PRIMA included participants at high risk for disease progression. This ad hoc analysis only evaluated participants randomized to niraparib maintenance without evidence of disease at baseline. The number and site(s) of initial recurrent lesions at investigator-assessed progressive disease (PD) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 314 niraparib-treated patients analyzed, 190 developed ≥1 new lesion (median number of new lesions, 1.0; interquartile range, 1-2). In total, 93.2% (177/190) of patients developed 1-3 lesions at first disease progression. The most common sites of recurrence were the peritoneum (30.0% [57/190]), lymph nodes (26.3% [50/190]), and liver (20.5% [39/190]). Similar results were observed when patients with PD were stratified by biomarker status, disease stage at diagnosis, and type of debulking surgery. Patients with homologous recombination-proficient tumors, stage III disease, or a history of primary debulking developed a median of 2.0 new lesions at first progression; patients with homologous recombination-deficient tumors, stage IV disease, or a history of interval debulking developed a median of 1.0 new lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with AOC without lesions at first-line maintenance treatment initiation develop oligometastatic disease at first recurrence. Prospective evaluation is required to determine whether these patients have improved outcomes when local therapies are combined with continuous, systemic, targeted maintenance therapy.

Asunto(s)

Indazoles , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Femenino , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodos , Adulto , Ftalazinas/administración & dosificación , Ftalazinas/efectos adversos , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la Enfermedad

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of niraparib in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: This was a follow-up analysis of a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in Japanese women with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer. Participants received niraparib (starting dose 300 mg) once daily in continuous 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events (defined as the overall incidence of the MedDRA Preferred Terms "thrombocytopenia" and "platelet count decreased") occurring in the 30 days after initial administration of niraparib, and secondary endpoints included evaluation of treatment-emergent adverse events and progression-free survival. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (median age, 62 years; median body weight, 53.9 kg) were enrolled. As previously reported, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events during the first 30 days of treatment was 31.6%. At data cutoff, median (range) treatment exposure was 504.0 (56-1,054) days and mean ± standard deviation dose intensity was 154.4±77.5 mg/day. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (n=14, 73.7%), decreased platelet count (n=12, 63.2%), decreased neutrophil count (n=11, 57.9%), anemia, vomiting, and decreased appetite (all n=9, 47.4%). One patient was diagnosed with treatment-related leukemia, which resulted in death. Median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival was 18.0 (5.6-26.7) months. CONCLUSION: Overall, the safety profile of niraparib was considered manageable in this study population of Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and was consistent with that observed in studies of non-Japanese patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759587.

Asunto(s)

Indazoles , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Trombocitopenia , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Trombocitopenia/epidemiología , Japón , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Adulto , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pueblos del Este de Asia

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To explore safety and tolerability parameters for the niraparib individualized starting dose (ISD) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to platinum-based chemotherapy who participated in the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial (NCT02655016). METHODS: The PRIMA protocol was amended so newly enrolled patients received an ISD based on baseline body weight/platelet count. In this ad hoc analysis, the timing, duration, and resolution of the first occurrence of common any-grade hematologic (thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia) and nonhematologic (nausea, asthenia/fatigue, constipation, insomnia, hypertension) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated by treatment arm in the ISD safety population (data cutoff, November 17, 2021; median follow-up, 3.5 years). RESULTS: Of 733 randomized patients, 255 were enrolled after the ISD protocol amendment and received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment (niraparib, 169; placebo, 86). In the niraparib arm, median times to first events were 22.0-35.0 days for hematologic TEAEs and 7.0-56.0 days for nonhematologic TEAEs. First events resolved in ≥ 89.8% of patients for hematologic TEAEs; for nonhematologic TEAEs, resolution rates ranged from 55.3% (insomnia) to 86.0% (nausea). Median durations of first hematologic TEAEs were ≤ 16.0 days, but for first nonhematologic TEAEs ranged from 18.0 days (nausea) to 134.0 days (insomnia). CONCLUSION: The niraparib ISD was generally well tolerated and TEAEs were manageable. Common hematologic and nonhematologic TEAEs occurred early and first events of hematologic TEAEs had a short duration (≈ 2 weeks) and a high resolution rate. These findings support close monitoring immediately following niraparib initiation and may help inform patient expectations for niraparib safety.

Asunto(s)

Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Humanos , Femenino , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Isoquinolinas/administración & dosificación , Isoquinolinas/efectos adversos , Isoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia de Mantención

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Combining PARP inhibitors (PARPis) with immune checkpoint inhibitors may improve clinical outcomes in selected cancers. We evaluated rucaparib and atezolizumab in advanced gynaecological or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: After identifying the recommended dose, patients with PARPi-naive BRCA-mutated or homologous recombination-deficient/loss-of-heterozygosity-high platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer or TNBC received rucaparib plus atezolizumab. Tumour biopsies were collected pre-treatment, during single-agent rucaparib run-in, and after starting combination therapy. RESULTS: The most common adverse events with rucaparib 600 mg twice daily and atezolizumab 1200 mg on Day 1 every 3 weeks were gastrointestinal effects, fatigue, liver enzyme elevations, and anaemia. Responding patients typically had BRCA-mutated tumours and higher pre-treatment tumour levels of PD-L1 and CD8 + T cells. Markers of DNA damage repair decreased during rucaparib run-in and combination treatment in responders, but typically increased in non-responders. Apoptosis signature expression showed the reverse. CD8 + T-cell activity and STING pathway activation increased during rucaparib run-in, increasing further with atezolizumab. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study, rucaparib plus atezolizumab demonstrated acceptable safety and activity in BRCA-mutated tumours. Increasing anti-tumour immunity and inflammation might be a key mechanism of action for clinical benefit from the combination, potentially guiding more targeted development of such regimens. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03101280).

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Indoles , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Humanos , Femenino , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Indoles/efectos adversos , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Antígeno B7-H1 , Proteína BRCA1/genética

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pamiparib is a potent, selective, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2 inhibitor that demonstrates synthetic lethality in cells with breast cancer susceptibility gene mutations or other homologous recombination deficiency. This two-stage phase 1b study (NCT03150810) assessed pamiparib in combination with temozolomide (TMZ) in adult patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced and metastatic solid tumors. METHODS: Oral pamiparib 60 mg was administered twice daily. During the dose-escalation stage, increasing doses of TMZ (40-120 mg once daily pulsed or 20-40 mg once daily continuous) were administered to determine the recommended dose to be administered in the dose-expansion stage. The primary objectives were to determine safety and tolerability, maximum tolerated/administered dose, recommended phase 2 dose and schedule, and antitumor activity of pamiparib in combination with TMZ. Pharmacokinetics of pamiparib and TMZ and biomarkers were also assessed. RESULTS: Across stages, 139 patients were treated (dose escalation, n = 66; dose expansion, n = 73). The maximum tolerated dose of TMZ, which was administered during dose expansion, was 7-day pulsed 60 mg once daily. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were anemia (dose escalation, 56.1%; dose expansion, 63.0%), nausea (dose escalation, 54.5%; dose expansion, 49.3%), and fatigue (dose escalation, 48.5%; dose expansion, 47.9%). In the dose-escalation stage, four patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (three neutropenia and one neutrophil count decreased). No TEAEs considered to be related to study drug treatment resulted in death. Antitumor activity was modest, indicated by confirmed overall response rate (dose escalation, 13.8%; dose expansion, 11.6%), median progression-free survival (3.7 and 2.8 months), and median overall survival (10.5 and 9.2 months). Administration of combination therapy did not notably impact pamiparib or TMZ pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: Pamiparib in combination with TMZ had a manageable safety profile. Further investigation of the efficacy of this combination in tumor types with specific DNA damage repair deficiencies is warranted.

Asunto(s)

Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bencimidazoles , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Neoplasias , Temozolomida , Humanos , Temozolomida/administración & dosificación , Temozolomida/farmacocinética , Temozolomida/efectos adversos , Temozolomida/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Anciano , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/patología , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bencimidazoles/administración & dosificación , Bencimidazoles/farmacocinética , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Bencimidazoles/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Esquema de Medicación , Fluorenos

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Niraparib is a poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved for the maintenance treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (OC). Niraparib was originally approved in recurrent OC at a fixed starting dose (FSD) of 300 mg once daily (QD). This analysis characterized the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of niraparib and evaluated the relationships between exposure, efficacy, and safety to support clinical use of an individualized dosing strategy, in which the starting dose of niraparib was adjusted based on patient characteristics to improve the benefit-risk profile. METHODS: A population PK model was developed by pooling data from four niraparib clinical trials (PN001 [n = 104], QUADRA [n = 455], NOVA [n = 403], and PRIMA [n = 480]) in patients with solid tumors, including OC. Exposure-response analyses were conducted to explore the relationships of niraparib exposure with progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events in the PRIMA study. A multivariate logistic regression model was also developed to estimate the probability of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, using data from patients enrolled in PRIMA and NOVA. The impact of an individualized starting dose (ISD) regimen (200 mg QD in patients with body weight [BW] <77 kg or platelet count [PLT] <150,000/µL, or 300 mg QD in patients with BW ≥77 kg and PLT ≥150,000/µL) on systemic exposure, efficacy, and safety was assessed. FINDINGS: Niraparib disposition was best described by a 3-compartment model with linear elimination. Key covariates included baseline creatinine clearance, BW, albumin, and age, all of which had minor effects on niraparib exposure. Comparable model-predicted exposure up to the time of disease progression/death or censoring in the 300-mg FSD and 200-/300-mg ISD groups was consistent with the lower rate of dose reduction in the ISD groups. No consistent niraparib exposure-response relationship was observed for efficacy in all PRIMA patients (first-line OC), and no statistically significant difference was seen in PFS curves for patients receiving a niraparib dose of 200 mg versus 300 mg. In the multivariate regression model, performed using combined data from PRIMA and NOVA, higher niraparib exposure (area under the concentration-time curve at steady-state [AUCss]), lower BW, and lower PLT were associated with an increased risk of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. IMPLICATIONS: Population PK and exposure-response analyses support use of an ISD to improve the safety profile of niraparib, including reducing the rate of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, without compromising efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01847274 (NOVA), NCT00749502 (PN001), NCT02655016 (PRIMA), NCT02354586 (QUADRA), www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Asunto(s)

Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Indazoles/farmacocinética , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto

RESUMEN

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with niraparib in treating patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Methods: Thirty-five patients with pathological confirmed platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who experienced progression after receiving at least two lines of standard treatment were eligible. All of them were treated with anlotinib combined with niraparib between September 2019 and October 2021. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The second endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test, and influence factor analysis was performed using Cox proportional risk regression models. Results: The best overall response showed that partial response was observed in 14 patients, stable disease was noted within 13 patients, and progressive disease was found in 8 patients. Therefore, the ORR and DCR of these 35 patients were 40.0% (95% CI:22.9%-57.1%) and 77.1% (95% CI:62.9%-91.4%), respectively. The median follow-up duration was 18.9 months (6.9-32.2). The median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI:5.35-7.66). Multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS indicated that age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and BRCA mutation status were independent factors influencing PFS (P＜0.05). Additionally, the PFS in patients with BRCA mutation who have never received PARP inhibitor treatment was significantly longer than that in patients without BRCA mutation who have been exposed to prior PARPi treatment (15.0 vs 6.0 month, P=0.029). The most common treatment-related adverse reactions were fatigue (85.7%), hematologic toxic (85.7%) and hypertension (74.3%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion: Anlotinib combined with niraparib shows a promising efficacy and tolerable safety in platinum-resistant ROC patients.

Asunto(s)

Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Indazoles , Indoles , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Quinolinas , Humanos , Femenino , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Indoles/efectos adversos , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Platino (Metal)/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Proteína BRCA2/genética

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of age on the efficacy and safety of niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with a complete/partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study (NCT02655016). Patients in the intent-to-treat population were categorized according to age at baseline (<65 years vs ≥65 years), and progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were evaluated for each age subgroup (clinical cutoff date, May 17, 2019). Safety findings were also evaluated according to a fixed starting dose (FSD) or an individualized starting dose (ISD). RESULTS: Of 733 randomized patients, 289 (39.4%) were ≥65 years (190 niraparib, 99 placebo) at baseline. Median PFS (niraparib vs placebo) and hazard ratios (95% CI) were similar in patients aged <65 years (13.9 vs 8.2 months; HR, 0.61 [0.47-0.81]) and ≥65 years (13.7 vs 8.1 months; HR, 0.53 [0.39-0.74]). The incidences of any-grade and grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar across age subgroups; in the niraparib arm, TEAEs leading to dose discontinuation occurred in 7.8% of patients <65 years and 18.4% of patients ≥65 years. ISD use lowered the incidence of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia events in niraparib-treated patients compared with the FSD (<65 years: 42.8% vs 18.0%; ≥65 years 57.0% vs 26.1%). HRQOL was comparable across age subgroups. CONCLUSION: Niraparib efficacy, safety, and HRQOL were generally comparable across age subgroups, although patients ≥65 years had a higher rate of discontinuations due to TEAEs. ISD use reduced grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia events regardless of age.

Asunto(s)

Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Edad , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodos

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Poly (ADP- ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) has been increasingly adopted for metastatic castration-resistance prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD). However, it is unclear which PARPi is optimal in mCRPC patients with HRD in 2nd -line setting. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review of trials regarding PARPi- based therapies on mCRPC in 2nd -line setting and performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) was assessed as primary outcome. PSA response and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed according to specific genetic mutation. RESULTS: Four RCTs comprised of 1024 patients (763 harbored homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations) were identified for quantitative analysis. Regarding rPFS, olaparib monotherapy, rucaparib and cediranib plus olaparib showed significant improvement compared with ARAT. Olaparib plus cediranib had the highest surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) scores (87.5%) for rPFS, followed by rucaparib, olaparib and olaparib plus abiraterone acetate prednisone. For patients with BRCA 1/2 mutations, olaparib associated with the highest probability (98.1%) of improved rPFS. For patients with BRCA-2 mutations, olaparib and olaparib plus cediranib had similar efficacy. However, neither olaparib nor rucaparib showed significant superior effectiveness to androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy (ARAT) in patients with ATM mutations. For safety, olaparib showed significantly lower ≥ 3 AE rate compared with cediranib plus olaparib (RR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.97), while olaparib plus cediranib was associated with the highest risk of all-grade AE. CONCLUSION: PARPi-based therapy showed considerable efficacy for mCRPC patients with HRD in 2nd -line setting. However, patients should be treated accordingly based on their genetic background as well as the efficacy and safety of the selected regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CRD42023454079.

Asunto(s)

Teorema de Bayes , Mutación , Ftalazinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Humanos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Masculino , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Ftalazinas/efectos adversos , Ftalazinas/administración & dosificación , Metaanálisis en Red , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/efectos adversos , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Reparación del ADN por Recombinación/genética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Indoles/efectos adversos , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Resultado del Tratamiento , Quinazolinas

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Combining poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) and topoisomerase I inhibitors has demonstrated synergistic effects in in vivo models. This phase I trial evaluated rucaparib and irinotecan in metastatic solid tumors with homologous recombination deficiency. METHODS: This study enrolled patients in three cohorts to determine the tolerability and preliminary efficacy of (1) rucaparib 400 mg PO twice a day (days 1-7, 15-21) and irinotecan 65 mg/m2 intravenously once every 2 weeks; (2) rucaparib 400 mg PO twice a day (D1-7, 15-21) and irinotecan 100 mg/m2 once every 2 weeks; and (3) rucaparib 400 mg per os twice a day (D1-7) and irinotecan 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty patients were enrolled: 95% with previous platinum, 40% with previous irinotecan, and 20% with previous PARP inhibitor. The maximally tolerated was determined as rucaparib 400 mg twice a day days 1-7 and irinotecan 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks. Four dose-limiting toxicities (all grade 3-4 neutropenia) occurred during dose escalation with only neutropenia as other grade 3-4 toxicities (25%; grade 3 [n = 3], grade 4 [n = 2]). Treatment-related grade 1-2 adverse events included neutropenia (45%), diarrhea (45%), nausea (40%), and fatigue (30%). Of 17 patients with evaluable disease, six patients (35%) derived clinical benefit (n = 2 with PR, n = 4 with stable disease for over 6 months). Three patients remained on study >1 year: two with ATM mutations (small bowel carcinoma and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor) and one patient with a PALB2 mutation (primary peritoneal cancer). CONCLUSION: Pulse dosing of rucaparib and once every 3 weeks irinotecan was well tolerated for up to 18 months with durable responses in BRCA-, PALB2-, and ATM-mutated cancers despite progression on previous platinum.

Asunto(s)

Indoles , Irinotecán , Neoplasias , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Irinotecán/administración & dosificación , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Indoles/efectos adversos , Anciano , Adulto , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/genética , Mutación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Recombinación Homóloga , Metástasis de la Neoplasia

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient barriers and facilitators to PARP inhibitor (PARP-I) maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer. PARP-I improves survival in ovarian cancer, but these multi-year therapies cost around $100,000 annually and are under-prescribed. METHODS: We recruited patients with ovarian cancer treated with PARP-I maintenance therapy at an academic health system for a semi-structured interview. Patient demographics, including genetics and PARP-I cost, were self-reported. We assessed patient experiences with barriers and facilitators of PARP-I usage. Two team members used a thematic approach to analyze and identify key themes. RESULTS: In May 2022, we interviewed 10 patients (mean age = 65 years; 80% White; 60% with a germline genetic mutation). Patients paid on average $227.50 monthly for PARP-I, straining resources for some participants. While sampled patients were insured, all patients identified having no or inadequate insurance as a major barrier to PARP-I. At the same time, all participants prioritized clinical effectiveness over costs of care. Patients identified PARP-I delivery from specialty pharmacies, separate and different from other medications, as a potential barrier, but each had been able to navigate delivery. Patients expressed significant initial side effects of PARP-I as a potential barrier yet reported clinician communication and prompt dose reduction as facilitating continuation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients identified cost, restrictive pharmacy benefits, and initial side effects as barriers to PARP-I usage. Having insurance and a supportive care team were identified as facilitators. Enhancing communication about PARP-I cost and side effects could improve patient experience and receipt of evidence-based maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias Ováricas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Femenino , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/economía , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/economía , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quimioterapia de Mantención/economía , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodos

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate disease characteristics and survival according to BRCA status, administration of poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), and surgery in patients with ovarian cancer and brain metastases. METHODS: This is a monocentric retrospective cohort of patients with ovarian cancer and brain metastases treated between 2000 and 2021. Data were collected by a retrospective review of medical records and analyzed according to: (1) BRCA mutation; (2) PARPi before and after brain metastases; (3) surgery for brain metastases. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients with ovarian cancer and brain metastasis and known BRCA status (31 BRCA mutated (BRCAm), 54 BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt)) were analyzed. Twenty-two patients had received PARPi before brain metastases diagnosis (11 BRCAm, 11 BRCAwt) and 12 after (8 BRCAm, 4 BRCAwt). Brain metastases occurred >1 year later in patients who had received previous PARPi. Survival was longer in the BRCAm group (median post-brain metastasis survival: BRCAm 23 months vs BRCAwt 8 months, p=0.0015). No differences were found based on BRCA status analyzing the population who did not receive PARPi after brain metastasis (median post-brain metastasis survival: BRCAm 8 months vs BRCAwt 8 months, p=0.31). In the BRCAm group, survival was worse in patients who had received previous PARPi (median post-brain metastasis survival: PARPi before, 7 months vs no-PARPi before, 24 months, p=0.003). If PARPi was administered after brain metastases, survival of the overall population improved (median post-brain metastasis survival: PARPi after, 46 months vs no-PARPi after, 8 months, p=0.00038).In cases of surgery for brain metastases, the prognosis seemed better (median post-brain metastasis survival: surgery 13 months vs no-surgery 8 months, p=0.036). Three variables were significantly associated with prolonged survival at multivariate analysis: BRCA mutation, multimodal treatment, and ≤1 previous chemotherapy line. CONCLUSIONS: BRCA mutations might impact brain metastasis occurrence and lead to better outcomes. In a multimodal treatment, surgery seems to affect survival even in cases of extracranial disease. PARPi use should be considered as it seems to prolong survival if administered after brain metastasis.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias Encefálicas , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Neoplasias Ováricas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/cirugía , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/mortalidad , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/secundario , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Anciano , Adulto , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Proteína BRCA1/genética

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study assessed effect of food on pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of fuzuloparib capsules. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, two-cycle, two-sequence, crossover clinical trial was conducted. 20 subjects were randomly assigned to 2 groups at a 1:1 ratio. The first group subjects were orally administered 150 mg fuzuloparib capsules under fasting condition in first dosing cycle. The same dose of fuzuloparib capsules were taken under postprandial state after a 7-day washout period. The second group was reversed. 3 ml whole blood was collected at each blood collection point until 72 h post dose. PK parameters were calculated. Furthermore, safety assessment was performed. RESULTS: The time to maximum concentration (Tmax) was prolonged to 3 h and maximum concentration (Cmax) decreased by 18.6% on high-fat diets. 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of geometric mean ratios (GMRs) for Cmax, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time t (AUC0-t), and area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) after high-fat meal were 71.6-92.6%, 81.7-102.7% and 81.6-102.5%, respectively. All treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were grade 1; No serious adverse events (SAEs), serious unexpected suspected adverse reaction (SUSAR) or deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: Food decreased the absorption rate and slowed time to peak exposure of fuzuloparib capsules, without impact on absorption extent. Dosing with food was found to be safe for fuzuloparib capsules in this study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with chinadrugtrials.org.cn (identifier: CTR20221498).

Asunto(s)

Cápsulas , Estudios Cruzados , Interacciones Alimento-Droga , Voluntarios Sanos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Área Bajo la Curva , Administración Oral , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ayuno

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to estimate the toxicities of PARP inhibitors (PARPis), based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched from inception to 16 April 2024, for RCTs of approved PARPis. The primary and secondary outcomes were grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) and grade 3-5 hematological AE, respectively. We conducted network meta-analyses to calculate the relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of outcomes. A disproportionality analysis was conducted to estimate the signals of hematological AEs associated with PARPis from the FAERS database. RESULTS: Overall, 27 RCTs involving 11,067 patients with cancer were included. Olaparib had the best safety profile for any grade 3-5 AEs and hematological AEs among four approved PARPis. Olaparib did not increase the risk of thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.48; 95%CI: 0.64-3.39), but other PARPis did. Furthermore 14,780 hematological AE reports associated with PARPis were identified in the FAERS database, and all PARPis were associated with strong hematological AE signals. Hematological AEs mainly occurred within the first 3 months (80.84%) after PARPi initiation. CONCLUSION: Olaparib had the best safety profile among five PARPis. PARPi-associated hematological AEs mainly occurred within the first 3 months. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42022385274).

Asunto(s)

Enfermedades Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Farmacovigilancia , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Hematológicas/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Hematológicas/epidemiología , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Bases de Datos Factuales , Ftalazinas , Piperazinas

RESUMEN

Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy have improved progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer; however, not all PARP inhibitors can provide benefit for a biomarker-unselected population. Senaparib is a PARP inhibitor that demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with solid tumors, including ovarian cancer, in phase 1 studies. The multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 trial FLAMES randomized (2:1) 404 females with advanced ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III-IV) and response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy to senaparib 100 mg (n = 271) or placebo (n = 133) orally once daily for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review. At the prespecified interim analysis, the median progression-free survival was not reached with senaparib and was 13.6 months with placebo (hazard ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.58; P < 0.0001). The benefit with senaparib over placebo was consistent in the subgroups defined by BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation or homologous recombination status. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 179 (66%) and 27 (20%) patients, respectively. Senaparib significantly improved progression-free survival versus placebo in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, irrespective of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and with consistent benefits observed between homologous recombination subgroups, and was well tolerated. These results support senaparib as a maintenance treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer after a response to first-line chemotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04169997 .

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias Ováricas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Adulto , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Método Doble Ciego , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Ftalazinas/administración & dosificación , Ftalazinas/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Piperazinas , Quinazolinas