RESUMEN

Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies are cornerstones of secondary prevention in high-risk cardiovascular patients. Whereas in former days the focus was set on effective antithrombotic effects, more recent trials and guidelines placed emphasis on a more balanced approach, thus including the bleeding risk for an individualized therapy. Type, strength, combination, and duration are important components to modify the individual bleeding risk. Novel antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents have shown promising results that might offer safer options in the future for high-risk cardiovascular patients. This review aims to give an overview about established drug target and pharmacologic approaches that are currently in the pipeline.

Asunto(s)

Anticoagulantes , Coagulación Sanguínea , Activación Plaquetaria , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Activación Plaquetaria/efectos de los fármacos , Activación Plaquetaria/fisiología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/farmacología , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Coagulación Sanguínea/fisiología , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/farmacología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/sangre , Plaquetas/efectos de los fármacos , Plaquetas/fisiología

RESUMEN

Managing antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing complex and high-risk in indicated patients, including those treated with complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS), is challenging. This review highlights the critical role of antithrombotic therapy, during and after PCI, to optimize the efficacy while minimizing risks. Unfractionated heparin remains the mainstay anticoagulant for complex PCI and CS, with bivalirudin as a potential safer alternative. Cangrelor offers consistent antiplatelet effects, especially when timely absorption of oral agents is uncertain.

Asunto(s)

Fibrinolíticos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Choque Cardiogénico , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Hirudinas/administración & dosificación , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Heparina/uso terapéutico , Heparina/administración & dosificación , Fragmentos de Péptidos , Proteínas Recombinantes

RESUMEN

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is fundamental in all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to prevent coronary thrombosis. In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), an oral anticoagulant gives protection against ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. AF-PCI patients are at high bleeding risk and decision-making regarding the optimal antithrombotic therapy remains challenging. Dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) has been shown to reduce bleeding events but at the cost of a higher risk of stent thrombosis. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal duration of triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) or DAT and the role of more potent antiplatelet drugs.

Asunto(s)

Anticoagulantes , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Trombosis Coronaria/prevención & control

RESUMEN

The antithrombotic management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) involves a 6-month course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), followed by chronic aspirin therapy. In patients with a baseline indication for anticoagulation, a variable duration of triple antithrombotic therapy is administered, followed by dual antithrombotic therapy until the sixth month post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and ultimately a transition to chronic anticoagulation. However, advancements in stent technology reducing the risk of stent thrombosis and a growing focus on the impact of bleeding on prognosis have prompted the development of new therapeutic strategies. These strategies aim to enhance protection against ischemic events in the initial stages after PCI while mitigating the risk of bleeding in the long term. This article delineates the therapeutic strategies outlined in European and American guidelines for CCS management, with special attention to investigational strategies.

Asunto(s)

Fibrinolíticos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Crónica , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos

RESUMEN

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) who undergo lower extremity revascularization (LER) are at high risk for cardiovascular and limb-related ischemic events. The role of antithrombotic therapy is to prevent thrombotic complications, but this requires balancing increased risk of bleeding events. The dual pathway inhibition (DPI) strategy including aspirin and low-dose rivaroxaban after LER has been shown to reduce major adverse cardiovascular and limb-related events without significant differences in major bleeding. There is now a need to implement the broad adoption of DPI therapy in PAD patients who have undergone LER in routine practice.

Asunto(s)

Fibrinolíticos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Trombosis/prevención & control , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificación

RESUMEN

Early mechanical reperfusion, primarily via percutaneous coronary intervention, combined with timely antithrombotic drug administration, constitutes the main approach for managing acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Clinicians have access to a variety of antithrombotic agents, necessitating careful selection to balance reducing thrombotic events against increased bleeding risks. This review offers a comprehensive update on current antithrombotic therapy in ACS, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment strategies.

Asunto(s)

Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Fibrinolíticos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/cirugía , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/prevención & control

RESUMEN

Antiplatelet therapy is integral to reduce the risk of future ischemic events following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); this aim must be balanced by limiting the risk of bleeding. Women with ACS or undergoing PCI have distinct platelet physiology, vascular anatomy, and clinical profiles that can influence the selection of an appropriate regimen. There are procedural techniques that can enhance safety in women. The poor inclusion of women in ACS and PCI trials limits our understanding of the ideal antiplatelet regimen in women, and future studies must find ways to increase the participation of female patients.

Asunto(s)

Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/prevención & control

Asunto(s)

Anticoagulantes , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Embolia Pulmonar , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares

RESUMEN

Importance: Prior trials showed that dual antiplatelet therapy could reduce the risk of early new stroke in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 24 hours of symptom onset. However, it is currently uncertain whether dual antiplatelet therapy can reduce the risk of early new stroke in patients with a more delayed initiation time window. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel and aspirin among patients with mild ischemic stroke or TIA when initiated within 24 hours, from more than 24 hours to 48 hours, and from more than 48 hours to 72 hours. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Intensive Statin and Antiplatelet Therapy for Acute High-Risk Intracranial or Extracranial Atherosclerosis randomized clinical trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 2-by-2 factorial randomized clinical trial conducted at 222 hospitals in China from September 17, 2018, to October 15, 2022. All patients with acute mild ischemic stroke and TIA were included in this subgroup analysis and categorized into 3 groups according to time from symptom onset to randomization (group 1: ≤24 hours; group 2: >24 to ≤48 hours; and group 3: >48 to 72 hours). Patients were followed up for 90 days. Interventions: All patients received clopidogrel combined with aspirin (clopidogrel 300 mg loading dose on day 1, followed by 75 mg daily on days 2 to 90, and aspirin 100 to 300 mg on the first day and then 100 mg daily for days 2 to 90) or aspirin alone (100 to 300 mg on day 1 and then 100 mg daily for days 2 to 90) within 72 hours after symptom onset. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was new stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) within 90 days. The primary safety outcome was moderate-to-severe bleeding, according to Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries criteria. Results: This analysis included a total of 6100 patients (3050 in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and 3050 in the aspirin group). The median age was 65 years (IQR, 57-71 years), and 3915 patients (64.2%) were male. In the population with time to randomization of 24 hours or less, stroke occurred in the next 90 days in 97 of 783 patients (12.4%); among those randomized from more than 24 hours to 48 hours, in 211 of 2552 patients (8.3%) among those randomized from more than 24 hours to 48 hours, and in 193 of 2765 patients (7.0%). The clopidogrel-aspirin group had a lower risk of new stroke within 90 days compared with the aspirin alone group both in patients with time to randomization of from 48 to 72 hours (5.8% vs 8.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.53-0.94]), of more than 24 to 48 hours (7.6% vs 8.9%; HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.65-1.12]), and of 24 hours or less (11.5% vs 13.4%; HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.55-1.25]) (P = .38 for interaction). Among those with time to randomization of more than 48 to 72 hours, moderate-to-severe bleeding occurred in 12 patients (0.9%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 6 patients (0.4%) in the aspirin-alone group (HR, 2.00 [95% CI, 0.73-5.43]), while moderate-to-severe bleeding in those with time to randomization of more than 24 hours to 48 hours occurred in 9 patients (0.7%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 4 patients (0.3%) in the aspirin-alone group (HR, 2.25 [95% CI, 0.68-7.39]) and in those with time to randomization of within 24 hours, occurred in 6 patients (1.5%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 3 patients (0.8%) in the aspirin-alone group (HR, 1.57 [95% CI, 0.36-6.83]) (P = .92 for interaction). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of antiplatelet therapy in China, patients with mild ischemic stroke or TIA had consistent benefit from dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin vs aspirin alone when initiated within 72 hours after symptom onset, with a similar increase in the risk of moderate-to-severe bleeding. Patients should receive dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin within 72 hours after symptom onset. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03635749.

Asunto(s)

Aspirina , Clopidogrel , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/tratamiento farmacológico , China/epidemiología , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

The CYP2C19 enzyme metabolizes clopidogrel, a prodrug, to its active form. Approximately 30% of individuals inherit a loss-of-function (LoF) polymorphism in the CYP2C19 gene, leading to reduced formation of the active clopidogrel metabolite. Reduced clopidogrel effectiveness has been well documented in patients with an LoF allele following an acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention. Prasugrel or ticagrelor is recommended in those with an LoF allele as neither is affected by CYP2C19 genotype. Although data demonstrate improved outcomes with a CYP2C19-guided approach to P2Y12 inhibitor selection, genotyping has not yet been widely adopted in clinical practice.

Asunto(s)

Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19 , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y , Humanos , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapéutico , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C19/genética , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/genética , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Genotipo , Ticagrelor/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Clorhidrato de Prasugrel/uso terapéutico , Polimorfismo Genético

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months is the standard of care after coronary stenting in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this individual patient-level meta-analysis was to summarise the evidence comparing DAPT de-escalation to ticagrelor monotherapy versus continuing DAPT for 12 months after coronary drug-eluting stent implantation. METHODS: A systematic review and individual patient data (IPD)-level meta-analysis of randomised trials with centrally adjudicated endpoints was performed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy (90 mg twice a day) after short-term DAPT (from 2 weeks to 3 months) versus 12-month DAPT in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with a coronary drug-eluting stent. Randomised trials comparing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy with DAPT after coronary revascularisation were searched in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and two websites (www.tctmd.com and www.escardio.org) from database inception up to May 20, 2024. Trials that included patients with an indication for long-term oral anticoagulants were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The principal investigators of the eligible trials provided IPD by means of an anonymised electronic dataset. The three ranked coprimary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCE; a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) tested for non-inferiority in the per-protocol population; and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 or 5 bleeding and all-cause death tested for superiority in the intention-to-treat population. All outcomes are reported as Kaplan-Meier estimates. The non-inferiority was tested using a one-sided α of 0·025 with the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1·15 (hazard ratio [HR] scale), followed by the ranked superiority testing at a two-sided α of 0·05. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024506083). FINDINGS: A total of 8361 unique citations were screened, of which 610 records were considered potentially eligible during the screening of titles and abstracts. Of these, six trials that randomly assigned patients to ticagrelor monotherapy or DAPT were identified. De-escalation took place a median of 78 days (IQR 31-92) after intervention, with a median duration of treatment of 334 days (329-365). Among 23 256 patients in the per-protocol population, MACCE occurred in 297 (Kaplan-Meier estimate 2·8%) with ticagrelor monotherapy and 332 (Kaplan-Meier estimate 3·2%) with DAPT (HR 0·91 [95% CI 0·78-1·07]; p=0·0039 for non-inferiority; τ2<0·0001). Among 24 407 patients in the intention-to-treat population, the risks of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding (Kaplan-Meier estimate 0·9% vs 2·1%; HR 0·43 [95% CI 0·34-0·54]; p<0·0001 for superiority; τ2=0·079) and all-cause death (Kaplan-Meier estimate 0·9% vs 1·2%; 0·76 [0·59-0·98]; p=0·034 for superiority; τ2<0·0001) were lower with ticagrelor monotherapy. Trial sequential analysis showed strong evidence of non-inferiority for MACCE and superiority for bleeding among the overall and ACS populations (the z-curve crossed the monitoring boundaries or the required information size without crossing the futility boundaries or approaching the null). The treatment effects were heterogeneous by sex for MACCE (p interaction=0·041) and all-cause death (p interaction=0·050), indicating a possible benefit in women with ticagrelor monotherapy, and by clinical presentation for bleeding (p interaction=0·022), indicating a benefit in ACS with ticagrelor monotherapy. INTERPRETATION: Our study found robust evidence that, compared with 12 months of DAPT, de-escalation to ticagrelor monotherapy does not increase ischaemic risk and reduces the risk of major bleeding, especially in patients with ACS. Ticagrelor monotherapy might also be associated with a mortality benefit, particularly among women, which warrants further investigation. FUNDING: Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale.

Asunto(s)

Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ticagrelor , Humanos , Ticagrelor/uso terapéutico , Ticagrelor/administración & dosificación , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento

Asunto(s)

Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Ticagrelor , Ticagrelor/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

Understanding the cost-effectiveness of aspirin-clopidogrel combination therapy is crucial in determining its influence on coagulation parameters, specifically prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness and clinical impact of using the aspirin-clopidogrel combination compared to aspirin alone in managing ischemic stroke. Employing an observational research design, inpatient ischemic stroke cases receiving the aspirin-clopidogrel combination were compared to those treated with aspirin alone. Focusing on the hospital's perspective on costs, the research specifically analyzed medical expenses without discounting costs or effects. The analysis involved comparing the direct medical costs and coagulation parameters between the two treatment groups. Our data revealed that the aspirin-clopidogrel combination demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness over aspirin alone, indicated by the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) values for PT (IDR -246,930/second) and APTT (IDR -119,270/second). This indicated that the combination therapy was associated with lower costs while yielding better clinical parameter values. The ICER analysis placed the aspirin-clopidogrel combination in the southeast quadrant, marking its dominance over aspirin monotherapy by demonstrating higher effectiveness at lower costs. These results suggest that combination therapy might be a favorable alternative for managing ischemic stroke, presenting a viable option for consideration in clinical practice. The findings underscore the potential economic and clinical advantages of employing the aspirin-clopidogrel combination in routine stroke management protocols.

Asunto(s)

Aspirina , Clopidogrel , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Quimioterapia Combinada , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/economía , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/economía , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/economía , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/economía

Asunto(s)

Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Hemorragia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/efectos adversos , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention mainly receive antiplatelet therapy. However, limited data are available regarding the optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following the implantation of new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of short-term (1-3 months) DAPT and standard (12 months) DAPT after the implantation of a new-generation of DES. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library Database, Embase for trials that compared short-term (1-3 months) and standard DAPT after the implantation of next-generation DES were retrieved from all published studies in English until December 31, 2021. The primary endpoint was major bleeding. The secondary endpoints included all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and all bleeding. RESULTS: This study included a total of 7 randomized controlled trials, comprising 28,344 subjects. Regarding primary endpoints, short-term DAPT exhibited a significantly lower incidence of major bleeding compared with standard DAPT [relative risk (RR): 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.54, 0.81), P < .0001]. For secondary endpoints, there were significant differences between short-term and standard DAPT in all bleeding [RR: 0.59, 95% CI: (0.50, 0.69), P < .00001]. However, no significant differences were identified in all-cause mortality [RR: 0.96, 95% CI: (0.77, 1.18), P = .27], myocardial infarction [RR: 0.98, 95% CI: (0.82, 1.18), P = .86], cardiac death [RR: 0.83, 95% CI: (0.63, 1.10), P = .20], stroke [RR: 1.08, 95% CI: (0.79, 1.47), P = .63], cerebrovascular [RR: 1.08, 95% CI: (0.79, 1.47), P = .63], and stent thrombosis [RR: 1.13, 95% CI: (0.80, 1.57), P = .49] between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing implantation of a new-generation of DES, short-term (1-3 months) DAPT exhibited no inferiority compared with standard (12 months) DAPT in terms of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and definite or probable stent thrombosis compared with standard (12 months) DAPT. However, short-term DAPT appeared superior to standard DAPT in terms of major bleeding and all bleeding.

Asunto(s)

Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/prevención & control

RESUMEN

Antithrombotic agents, including antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants, are widely used in Korea because of the increasing incidence of cardiocerebrovascular disease and the aging population. The management of patients using antithrombotic agents during endoscopic procedures is an important clinical challenge. The clinical practice guidelines for this issue, developed by the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, were published in 2020. However, new evidence on the use of dual antiplatelet therapy and direct anticoagulant management has emerged, and revised guidelines have been issued in the United States and Europe. Accordingly, the previous guidelines were revised. Cardiologists were part of the group that developed the guideline, and the recommendations went through a consensus-reaching process among international experts. This guideline presents 14 recommendations made based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology and was reviewed by multidisciplinary experts. These guidelines provide useful information that can assist endoscopists in the management of patients receiving antithrombotic agents who require diagnostic and elective therapeutic endoscopy. It will be revised as necessary to cover changes in technology, evidence, or other aspects of clinical practice.

Asunto(s)

Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Fibrinolíticos , Humanos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/normas , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Consenso , República de Corea , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recently, the effect of Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] on thrombogenesis has aroused great interest, while inflammation has been reported to modify the Lp(a)-associated risks through an unidentified mechanism. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the association between platelet reactivity with Lp(a) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in percutaneous intervention (PCI) patients treated with clopidogrel. METHODS: Data were collected from 10,724 consecutive PCI patients throughout the year 2013 in Fuwai Hospital. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) and low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) were defined as thrombelastography (TEG) maximum amplitude of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet (MAADP) > 47 mm and < 31 mm, respectively. RESULTS: 6615 patients with TEG results were finally enrolled. The mean age was 58.24 ± 10.28 years and 5131 (77.6%) were male. Multivariable logistic regression showed that taking Lp(a) < 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP < 2 mg/L as the reference, isolated Lp(a) elevation [Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP < 2 mg/L] was not significantly associated with HTPR (P = 0.153) or LTPR (P = 0.312). However, the joint elevation of Lp(a) and hs-CRP [Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP ≥ 2 mg/L] exhibited enhanced association with both HTPR (OR:1.976, 95% CI 1.677-2.329) and LTPR (OR:0.533, 95% CI 0.454-0.627). CONCLUSIONS: The isolated elevation of Lp(a) level was not an independent indicator for platelet reactivity, yet the concomitant elevation of Lp(a) and hs-CRP levels was significantly associated with increased platelet reactivity. Whether intensified antiplatelet therapy or anti-inflammatory strategies could mitigate the risks in patients presenting combined Lp(a) and hs-CRP elevation requires future investigation.

Asunto(s)

Proteína C-Reactiva , Clopidogrel , Lipoproteína(a) , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Masculino , Clopidogrel/farmacología , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Lipoproteína(a)/sangre , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Anciano , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Ticlopidina/farmacología , Ticlopidina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/farmacología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Plaquetas/efectos de los fármacos

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the ATAMIS (Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Mild to Moderate Ischemic Stroke) trial to investigate whether the priority of clopidogrel plus aspirin to aspirin alone was consistent between patients with and without stroke pathogenesis of large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with stroke classification randomized to a clopidogrel-plus-aspirin group and aspirin-alone group in a modified intention-to-treat analysis set of ATAMIS were classified into LAA and non-LAA subtypes. The primary outcome was early neurologic deterioration at 7 days, defined as a >2-point increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score compared with baseline, and safety outcomes were bleeding events and intracranial hemorrhage. We compared treatment effects in each stroke subtype and investigated the interaction. Among 2910 patients, 225 were assigned into the LAA subtype (119 in the clopidogrel-plus-aspirin group and 106 in the aspirin-alone group) and 2685 into the non-LAA subtype (1380 in the clopidogrel-plus-aspirin group and 1305 in the aspirin-alone group). Median age was 66 years, and 35% were women. A lower proportion of early neurologic deterioration was found to be associated with dual antiplatelet therapy in the LAA subtype (adjusted risk difference, -10.4% [95% CI, -16.2% to -4.7%]; P=0.001) but not in the non-LAA subtype (adjusted risk difference, -1.4% [95% CI, -2.6% to 0.1%]; P=0.06). No significant interaction was found (P=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the non-LAA subtype, patients with stroke of the LAA subtype may get more benefit from dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus aspirin with respect to early neurologic deterioration at 7 days. REGISTRATION: URL: clinicaltrials.gov; UnIque identifier: NCT02869009.

Asunto(s)

Aspirina , Clopidogrel , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/administración & dosificación , Clopidogrel/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/etiología , Aterosclerosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Aterosclerosis/diagnóstico , Aterosclerosis/complicaciones , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel monotherapy improved clinical outcomes compared with aspirin monotherapy during a chronic maintenance period in patients who underwent coronary stenting in the HOST-EXAM (Harmonizing Optimal Strategy for Treatment of Coronary Artery Stenosis-Extended Antiplatelet Monotherapy) trial. However, it is uncertain whether the beneficial effect of clopidogrel over aspirin is different according to the renal function. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the HOST-EXAM trial. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, readmission due to acute coronary syndrome, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding type ≥3, during the 2-year follow up. Among the 5438 patients enrolled in the HOST-EXAM trial, 4844 patients (mean age, 63.3±10.6 years; 74.9% men) with a baseline creatinine value were analyzed in this study. A total of 508 (10.5%) patients had CKD, who were at higher risk of the primary end point compared with those without CKD (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01 [95% CI, 1.51-2.67]). Clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with a lower rate of the primary end point in both patients with CKD (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.44-1.25]) and patients without CKD (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.56-0.91]). No significant interaction was observed between the treatment effect and CKD status (P for interaction=0.889). CONCLUSIONS: During the chronic maintenance period after coronary stenting, the risk of thrombotic and bleeding events was significantly higher in patients with CKD compared with those without CKD. There was no statistical difference in the treatment effect of clopidogrel monotherapy in those with versus without CKD.

Asunto(s)

Aspirina , Clopidogrel , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/efectos adversos , Clopidogrel/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Anciano , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Stents , Factores de Tiempo

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This review article discussed the use of bridging therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery (NCS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). HYPOTHESES: Patients who undergo PCI are at an increased risk of thrombotic events due to their underlying cardiovascular disease. However, many of these patients may require NCS at some point in their lives, which poses a significant challenge for clinicians as they balance the risk of thrombotic events against the risk of bleeding associated with antithrombotic therapy. RESULTS: This review evaluates the current evidence on the use of bridging therapy with LMWH in patients undergoing NCS after PCI, focusing on outcomes related to the efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy. The article also discusses the limitations of the current evidence and highlights areas where further research is needed to optimize the management of antithrombotic therapy in this patient population. CONCLUSION: The goal of this review was to provide clinicians with a comprehensive summary of the available evidence to guide clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes.

Asunto(s)

Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Trombosis/prevención & control , Trombosis/etiología , Medición de Riesgo