RESUMEN
SUMMARY: Clear awareness of the vascular variations is critical in surgeries, which may cause massive hemorrhage during surgical procedures. During educational dissection of a male cadaver, we encountered a combined variation of the left obturator artery and ipsilateral aberrant inferior epigastric artery. The left obturator artery originated from the external iliac artery, then coursed inward, adherent to the superior pubic ramus. The left inferior epigastric artery originated from the femoral artery, and coursed behind the femoral vein. These anatomical variations shown in one person were extremely rare. This is particularly true with regard to these variations while performing pelvic and inguinal region surgeries.
El conocimiento claro de las variaciones vasculares es fundamental en las cirugías, ya que pueden causar una hemorragia masiva durante los procedimientos quirúrgicos. Durante la disección educativa de un cadáver de sexo masculino, encontramos una variación combinada de la arteria obturatriz izquierda y la arteria epigástrica inferior ipsilateral aberrante. La arteria obturatriz izquierda se originaba en la arteria ilíaca externa, luego discurrió hacia medial, adhiriéndose a la rama púbica superior. La arteria epigástrica inferior izquierda se originaba en la arteria femoral y discurría por detrás de la vena femoral. Estas variaciones anatómicas mostradas en una sola persona son extremadamente raras. Esto es importante de conocer estas variaciones cuando se realizan cirugías de las regiones pélvica e inguinal.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Arterias/anomalías , Ingle/irrigación sanguínea , Cadáver , Arterias Epigástricas/anomalías , Vena Femoral/anomalíasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Prosthetic arterial graft infections (PAGIs) in the groin pose significant challenges in terms of revascularization options and risk of limb loss as well as associated morbidities. Although obturator canal bypass (OCB) has been suggested for revascularization of the extremity in these cases, moderate success rates and technical challenges have limited widespread use. Our study analyzed lateral femoral bypass (LFB) as an alternative approach for the treatment of groin PAGIs. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent LFB for groin PAGIs at a single center from 2000 to 2017. Patients' data including demographics, comorbidities, perioperative complications, graft patency, and need for reintervention were used. Patients were observed after LFB with duplex ultrasound surveillance in an accredited noninvasive vascular laboratory every 3 months during the first year, followed by every 6 months for the second year and yearly thereafter. After isolation of the infected wound with sterile dressings, remote proximal and distal arterial exposure incisions were made. LFBs were tunneled under the inguinal ligament and lateral to the infected wound from an uninvolved inflow artery or bypass graft to an uninvolved outflow vessel. RESULTS: A total of 19 LFBs were performed in 16 patients (mean age, 69 ± 12.6 years). Three LFBs were performed urgently for acute bleeding. Choice of conduit included 6 (31.6%) autogenous vein grafts, 10 (52.6%) cadaveric grafts, 2 (10.5%) rifampin-soaked Dacron grafts, and 1 (5.3%) polytetrafluoroethylene graft. Average follow-up was 33 months (range, 0-103 months). Major adverse events occurring within 30 days of the operation included one (5.3%) death and one (5.3%) graft excision for pseudoaneurysm. Primary patency and primary assisted patency at 12 and 24 months were 73% and 83%, respectively. One patient required an amputation 17 months after surgery after failure of repeated revascularization attempts. Overall limb salvage was 93.8% during this follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, LFB for management of groin PAGIs demonstrated higher patency and limb salvage rates compared with previous reports of OCB. Diligent postoperative duplex ultrasound surveillance is critical to the achievement of limb salvage and maintenance of graft patency. These results suggest that LFB, which is technically less complex than OCB, should be considered the first choice for revascularization in select cases of PAGIs involving the groin.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Ingle/irrigación sanguínea , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/fisiopatología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Vascular groin incision complications contribute significantly to patients' morbidity and rising health care costs. Negative pressure therapy over the closed incision decreases the infection rate in cardiac and orthopedic procedures. This study prospectively evaluated negative pressure therapy as a means to decrease wound complications and associated health care costs. METHODS: This was a randomized, prospective, single-institution study of 119 femoral incisions closed primarily after elective vascular surgery including both inflow (eg, aortofemoral) and outflow (eg, femoral-popliteal bypass) procedures. Incisions were categorized as high risk for wound complications on the basis of body mass index >30 kg/m2, pannus, reoperation, prosthetic graft, poor nutrition, immunosuppression, or hemoglobin A1c >8% and randomized 1:1 to standard gauze (n = 60) dressing vs negative pressure therapy (Prevena [Acelity, San Antonio, Tex], n = 59). Wound complication rate, length of stay (LOS), reoperation, readmission, and variable hospital costs were determined during 30 days. Statistical analysis was performed using χ2 test along with a two-sample unpaired t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS: There were no significant demographic differences (age, sex, risk factors for wound complication) between the two high-risk groups. In low-risk controls, the major wound complication rate was 4.8% (involving one infection in 21 incisions), resulting in a 3.8-day LOS, 4.8% reoperation, 4.8% readmission rate, and $17,599 in average variable cost. For high-risk controls, there was a significant increase in major wound complications to 25% (including all 12 infections in 60 incisions), LOS (10.6 days), reoperation (18.3%), readmission (16.7%), and costs ($36,537). Finally, negative pressure therapy significantly reduced major wound complications to 8.5% (including five of six infections in 59 incisions; P < .001), reoperation (8.5%; P < .05), and readmission (6.8%; P < .04) but not LOS (10.6 days). The average variable cost was reduced ($30,492), yielding an average savings of $6045 per patient (P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that negative pressure therapy significantly reduces the major wound complication, reoperation, and readmission rates for patients at high risk for groin wound complications. Furthermore, this therapy may lead to a reduction in hospital costs. Negative pressure therapy for all groin incisions considered at high risk for wound complications is recommended.