RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal infliximab dose intensification strategy to address loss of response associated with subtherapeutic infliximab trough levels remains uncertain, as does whether post-intensification trough and treatment targets should influence this decision. OBJECTIVES: This pharmacokinetic simulation study aimed to identify infliximab dose intensification strategies capable of achieving post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with clinical and objective treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. METHODS: A validated pharmacokinetic infliximab model, applied to 200 simulated patients, identified those with subtherapeutic (< 3.00 mg/L) trough levels after 30 weeks of standard (5 mg/kg 8-weekly) dosing, and subsequently applied 10 dose intensification strategies over a further 32 weeks. The proportion of simulations achieving 32-week post-intensification infliximab trough levels associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis > 7.50 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 9.70 mg/L) was the primary outcome, with perianal fistula healing (Crohn's disease > 10.10 mg/L) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis > 3.70 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 7.00mg/L) evaluated as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were stratified by intensity of dose intensification, with standard (≤ 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) and intensive (> 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) dosing strategies defined, respectively. RESULTS: The median pre-intensification infliximab trough level was 0.91 mg/L (interquartile range 1.37). Intensive dosing strategies were more likely to achieve infliximab trough concentrations associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis 36.48% vs. 10.80%, Crohn's disease 25.98 vs. 4.68%), perianal fistula healing (24.52% vs. 4.36%) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis 61.90% vs. 34.86%, Crohn's disease 40.32 vs. 12.08%) than standard intensification strategies (all p < 0.01). When controlling for cumulative (mg/kg) infliximab dose over 32 weeks, strategies that concurrently dose increased and interval shortened achieved the highest infliximab trough levels (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This simulation-based analysis highlights the potential of using post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with aspirational treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis to guide choice of infliximab dose intensification strategy. Intensive dose intensification strategies, particularly those that concurrently dose increase and interval shorten, appear to achieve higher infliximab levels than standard dose intensification strategies. This may be particularly important in the pursuit of stringent endpoints, such as endoscopic remission and fistula healing, which have been consistently associated with higher infliximab trough levels. These findings require validation across real-world cohorts.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: A substantial proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on intravenous infliximab require dose intensification. Accessing additional intravenous infliximab is labour-intensive and expensive, depending on insurance and pharmaceutical reimbursement. Observational data suggest that subcutaneous infliximab may offer a convenient and safe alternative to maintain disease remission in patients requiring dose-intensified infliximab. A prospective, controlled trial is required to confirm that subcutaneous infliximab is as effective as dose-intensified intravenous infliximab, to identify predictors of disease flare and to establish the role of subcutaneous infliximab therapeutic drug monitoring. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DISCUS-IBD trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label non-inferiority study comparing the rate of disease flares in participants randomised to continue dose-intensified intravenous infliximab to those switched to subcutaneous infliximab after 48 weeks. Participants are adult patients with IBD in sustained corticosteroid-free remission on any regimen of dose-intensified infliximab up to a maximum of 10 mg/kg 4-weekly intravenously. Participants allocated to intravenous infliximab will continue infliximab at the same dose-intensified regimen they were receiving at study enrolment. Subcutaneous infliximab dosing will be stratified by prior intravenous infliximab dosing. Clinical (Harvey-Bradshaw Index, partial Mayo score), biochemical (C reactive protein, faecal calprotectin), pharmacokinetic (drug-level±antidrug antibodies) and qualitative data are collected 12-weekly until study conclusion at week 48. 13 sites across Australia will participate in recruitment to reach a calculated sample size of 120 participants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Multisite ethics approval was obtained from the Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) at The Alfred Hospital under a National Mutual Acceptance (NMA) agreement (HREC/90559/Alfred-2022; Local Reference: Project 618/22, version 1.6, 2 March 2023). Findings will be reported at national and international gastroenterology meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. DISCUS-IBD was prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) prior to commencing recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12622001458729.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIMS: Use of infliximab (IFX) has improved outcomes in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, a proportion of patients does not respond to IFX or loses response over time. Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modelling is a promising approach for IFX dose optimization, but with the increasing number of PopPK models in literature, model evaluation is essential. The aims of this study are: (i) to validate the predictive performance of existing IFX PopPK models using a cohort of children with IBD; and (ii) to perform a Bayesian estimation of the most suitable model to predict the next IFX concentrations. METHODS: PubMed was searched for IFX PopPK models in children. Selected models were rebuilt and analysed using R. Model performance was assessed through goodness-of-fit-plots, residuals against time, prediction error and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks. The validation cohort consisted of 73 children with IBD who were treated with IFX in our centre between 2017 and 2023 (340 IFX measurements). RESULTS: We identified 9 PopPK models. Model bias for individual predicted values ranged from -9.29% to 8.01% compared to bias for population predicted values. The model by Vande Casteele et al. demonstrated superior performance (individual predicted bias 2.13, population predicted bias -6.11); upon Bayesian estimation, it predicted induction trough levels with median error of 12.95% but had a median error of -69% predicting maintenance concentrations. CONCLUSION: The model by Vande Casteele et al. displayed superior performance in initial evaluations but had a high error in estimating next IFX levels and can only be used in practice to predict induction levels.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background/Aims: Studies on elective switching to the subcutaneous (SC) formulation of infliximab revealed comparable efficacy and safety and higher infliximab level than those exhibited by intravenous (IV) infliximab. However, no studies have reported on the effectiveness of SC switching in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who experienced IV infliximab failure during maintenance treatment. Methods: This retrospective study included UC patients who had been switched to SC infliximab because of IV infliximab failure, between January 2021 and January 2023. Group A was defined as having clinically and biochemically active UC (secondary loss of response), and group B consisted of patients with stable symptoms but biochemically active UC. Results: Twenty-three patients met the inclusion criteria: 15 in group A and eight in group B. The serum infliximab levels significantly increased after SC switching in both groups. The electively switched group also exhibited increased infliximab levels after SC switching. Patients in group A showed improved partial Mayo score with a significant decrease in fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein after switching. In group B, the fecal calprotectin level significantly decreased without clinical relapse after switching. A high proportion of patients (≥80%) in both groups achieved clinical and/or biochemical responses at the last follow-up. During the follow-up period, only two patients in group A discontinued SC infliximab, and only one complained of severe injection site reaction. Conclusions: In UC patients who experience IV infliximab failure during maintenance treatment, switching to SC infliximab may be a promising option because of better efficacy and safety.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX) exposure is established as a predictive factor of pharmacokinetic (PK) origin in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and expert consensus is to achieve adequate exposure during induction to achieve and sustain remission. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the performance of a Bayesian PK tool in IBD patients starting IFX. Trough IFX serum levels collected immediately before the third (at week 6) and fourth (at week 14) infusions were evaluated from 307 IBD patients (median age=17 years, 50 % females, 83 % with Crohn's disease). Forecasted IFX concentration at the fourth infusion were estimated using serum IFX, antibodies to IFX, albumin and weight determined immediately before the third infusion using population PK calculator with Bayesian prior. The outcome variable was a clinical & biochemical remission status achieved (CRP levels below 3 mg/L in presence of clinical remission). Statistics consisted of Kaplan Meier analysis with calculation of Hazard ratio (HR), and logistic regression. RESULTS: IFX concentration above 15 µg/mL immediately before the third infusion associated with shorter time to clinical & biochemical remission than concentration below 15 µg/mL without reaching significance (163±14 days vs 200±16 days, respectively; p=0.052). However, using PK parameters at the third infusion, forecasted IFX concentrations above 10 µg/mL immediately before the fourth infusion were significantly associated with a higher rate (HR=1.6 95 %CI: 1.1 to 2.1 p<0.01) and shorter time to remission (148±18 days vs 200±13 days p<0.01). In the presence of IFX concentration above 15 µg/mL at the third infusion, there was a significant 2.5-fold higher likelihood of sustained clinical & biochemical remission status during maintenance as compared to IFX concentrations below 15 µg/mL (p<0.01). Forecasted IFX level above 10 µg/mL at fourth infusion associated with significantly 3.9-fold higher likelihood of clinical & biochemical remission as compared to forecasted IFX concentrations below 10 µg/mL (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data further support that optimized IFX concentrations during induction are associated with enhanced disease control in IBD.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, has revolutionized the pharmacological management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). This position statement critically reviews and examines existing data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab in patients with IMIDs. It provides a practical guide on implementing TDM in current clinical practices and outlines priority areas for future research. METHODS: The endorsing TDM of Biologics and Pharmacometrics Committees of the International Association of TDM and Clinical Toxicology collaborated to create this position statement. RESULTS: Accumulating data support the evidence for TDM of infliximab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases, with limited investigation in other IMIDs. A universal approach to TDM may not fully realize the benefits of improving therapeutic outcomes. Patients at risk for increased infliximab clearance, particularly with a proactive strategy, stand to gain the most from TDM. Personalized exposure targets based on therapeutic goals, patient phenotype, and infliximab administration route are recommended. Rapid assays and home sampling strategies offer flexibility for point-of-care TDM. Ongoing studies on model-informed precision dosing in inflammatory bowel disease will help assess the additional value of precision dosing software tools. Patient education and empowerment, and electronic health record-integrated TDM solutions will facilitate routine TDM implementation. Although optimization of therapeutic effectiveness is a primary focus, the cost-reducing potential of TDM also merits consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of TDM for infliximab necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, hospital pharmacists, and (quantitative) clinical pharmacologists to ensure an efficient research trajectory.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Efficacy of infliximab in children with inflammatory bowel disease can be enhanced when serum concentrations are measured and further dosing is adjusted to achieve and maintain a target concentration. Use of a population pharmacokinetic model may help to predict an individual's infliximab dose requirement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of available infliximab population pharmacokinetic models in an independent cohort of Dutch children with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we used data of 70 children with inflammatory bowel disease (443 infliximab concentrations) to evaluate eight models that focused on infliximab pharmacokinetic models in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease, preferably aged ≤ 18 years. Predictive performance was evaluated with prior predictions (based solely on patient-specific covariates) and posterior predictions (based on covariates and infliximab trough concentrations). Model accuracy and precision were calculated with relative bias and relative root mean square error and we determined the classification accuracy at the trough concentration target of ≥ 5 mg/L. RESULTS: The population pharmacokinetic model by Fasanmade was identified to be most appropriate for the total dataset (relative bias before/after therapeutic drug monitoring: -20.7%/11.2% and relative root mean square error before/after therapeutic drug monitoring: 84.1%/51.6%), although differences between models were small and several were deemed suitable for clinical use. For the Fasanmade model, sensitivity and specificity for maximum posterior predictions for the next infliximab trough concentration to be ≥ 5 mg/L were respectively 83.5% and 80% with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.870. CONCLUSIONS: In our paediatric cohort, various models provided acceptable predictive performance, with the Fasanmade model deemed most suitable for clinical use. Model-informed precision dosing can therefore be expected to help to maintain infliximab trough concentrations in the target range.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab has been shown to be a effective strategy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling can predict trough concentrations for individualized dosing. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a PopPK model of infliximab in a paediatric population with IBD, assessing the effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and other biomarkers on infliximab clearance. METHODS: This observational and ambispective single-centre study was conducted in paediatric patients with IBD treated with infliximab between July 2016 and July 2022 in the Paediatric Gastroenterology Service of the Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron (HUVH) (Spain). Demographic, clinical, and analytical variables were collected. Twenty SNPs potentially associated with variations in the response to infliximab plasma concentrations were analysed. infliximab serum concentrations and antibodies to infliximab (ATI) were determined by ELISA. PopPK modelling was performed using nonlinear mixed-effects analysis (NONMEM). RESULTS: Thirty patients (21 males) were included. The median age (range) at the start of infliximab treatment was 13 years (16 months to 16 years). A total of 190 samples were obtained for model development (49 [25.8%] during the induction phase). The pharmacokinetics (PK) of infliximab were described using a two-compartment model. Weight, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), faecal calprotectin (FC), and the SNP rs1048610 (ADAM17) showed statistical significance for clearance (CL), and albumin for inter-compartmental clearance (Q). Estimates of CL1 (genotype 1-AA), CL2 (genotype 2-AG), CL3 (genotype 3-GG), Q, Vc, and Vp (central and peripheral distribution volumes) were 0.0066 L/h/46.4 kg, 0.0055 L/h/46.4 kg, 0.0081 L/h/46.4 kg, 0.0029 L/h/46.4 kg, 0.6750 L/46.4 kg, and 1.19 L/46.4 kg, respectively. The interindividual variability (IIV) estimates for clearance, Vc, and Vp were 19.33, 16.42, and 36.02%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A popPK model utilising weight, albumin, FC, ESR, and the SNP rs1048610 accurately predicted infliximab trough concentrations in children with IBD.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic non-inferiority of subcutaneous (SC) to intravenous (IV) CT-P13 maintenance therapy was demonstrated in a randomized trial (NCT02883452). This post hoc analysis evaluated longitudinal clinical outcomes with the two infliximab treatment strategies. METHODS: Patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis received CT­P13 IV loading doses (5 mg/kg; Week [W] 0 and W2) before randomization (1:1) to receive CT-P13 SC (body weight-based dosing every 2 weeks [Q2W]; W6-54; 'SC maintenance group') or CT­P13 IV (5 mg/kg Q8W; W6-22) then CT-P13 SC (Q2W; W30-54; 'IV-to-SC switch group'). Paired W30/W54 patient-level data were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three (IV-to-SC switch) and fifty-nine (SC maintenance) patients were analyzed. Median trough serum CT-P13 concentrations were significantly higher at W54 versus W30 in the IV-to-SC switch group (20.4 versus 2.3 µg/mL; p < 0.00001), while remaining consistent in the SC maintenance group. Statistically significant improvements in pharmacokinetics, efficacy, fecal calprotectin levels, and quality of life were seen following switch to SC administration at W30 in the IV-to-SC switch group; safety findings were similar pre- and post-switch. CONCLUSION: Formulation switching from IV to SC infliximab maintenance therapy was well tolerated and may provide additional clinical improvements. Findings require confirmation in larger prospective studies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Effective management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) relies on a comprehensive understanding of infliximab (IFX) pharmacokinetics (PK). This study's primary goal was to develop a robust PK model, identifying key covariates influencing IFX clearance (CL), while concurrently evaluating the risk of disease progression during the maintenance phase of IBD treatment. METHODS: The multicenter, prospective, real-world DIRECT study was conducted in several care centers, which included 369 IBD patients in the maintenance phase of IFX therapy. A two-compartment population PK model was used to determine IFX CL and covariates. Logistic and Cox regressions were applied to elucidate the associations between disease progression and covariates embedded in the PK model. RESULTS: The PK model included the contributions of weight, albumin, antidrug antibody (ADA), and fecal calprotectin (FC). On average, higher ADA, FC concentration and weight, and lower albumin concentration resulted in higher IFX CL. In the multivariate regression analyses, FC levels influenced the odds of disease progression in the majority of its definitions, when adjusted for several confounding factors. Additionally, alongside FC, both IFX and CL demonstrated a significant impact on the temporal aspect of disease progression. CONCLUSION: In this 2-year real-world study, readily available clinical covariates, notably FC, significantly impacted IFX availability in IBD patients. We demonstrated that subclinical active inflammation, as mirrored by FC or CRP, substantially influenced IFX clearance. Importantly, FC emerged as a pivotal determinant, not only of IFX pharmacokinetics but also of disease progression. These findings underscore the need to integrate FC into forthcoming IFX pharmacokinetic models, amplifying its clinical significance.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring provides important guidance for treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and could help to early identify treatment failure. This study aimed to validate a finger prick-based capillary blood sampling technique to measure biological trough levels and C-reactive protein (CRP) and evaluate patient performance and -support. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, patients with IBD receiving infliximab (IFX) or vedolizumab (VEDO) therapy performed finger prick-based capillary blood sampling at home. Additionally, blood was collected through routinely performed in-hospital venepuncture prior to biological infusion. IFX, VEDO, and CRP concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The concordance between methods was statistically evaluated and a survey was conducted to assess practicality and patient support. RESULTS: In total, 81 patients (46 IFX, 35 VEDO) were enrolled. Mean differences between both methods were 0.42 (95% confidence interval, -1.74 to 2.58) µg/mL for IFX and 0.72 (95% confidence interval, -5.50 to 6.94) µg/mL for VEDO. Passing-Bablok regressions demonstrated no evidence for systematic or proportional biases. Venous and capillary IFX (ρ = 0.96, P < .001) and VEDO (ρ = 0.97, P < .001) levels strongly correlated and showed high intermethod agreement (Cohen's kappa: IFX = 0.82; VEDO = 0.94). Similarly, venous and capillary CRP levels were strongly correlated (ρ = 0.99, P < .001). Most patients (>95%) were able to successfully perform the self-sampling at home without prior instructions. CONCLUSIONS: This study clinically validated a finger prick-based capillary blood self-sampling technique allowing concomitant home monitoring of biological levels and CRP for patients with IBD, who reported substantial support, tolerability, and practicality.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In Latin America, experience with monitoring serum Infliximab (IFX) concentrations is scarce. Our study aimed to compare IFX serum concentrations between patients with active disease or in remission. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in patients with luminal Crohn's disease (CD) during maintenance treatment with IFX. Patients were classified as in remission or disease activity according to clinical scores and endoscopic, radiological, and laboratory markers. A comparison of IFX trough levels between the two groups was performed. RESULTS: 80 CD patients were included [41 (51%) in remission and 39 (49%) with active disease]. In the analysis of general disease activity, the median serum levels of IFX in patients with remission and with active CD were 5.63 [0.03-14.40] vs. 3.84 [0.03-14.40] (p=0.287). Furthermore, there was no difference in serum IFX concentrations in endoscopic, radiological, and laboratory activities. Only in the clinical evaluation there was a significant difference in the median serum IFX levels between patients in remission and disease activity, 5.63 [0.03-14.40] vs. 2.14 [0.32-10.54] (p=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: IFX serum concentrations during maintenance treatment were similar in patients with luminal CD in remission and general, endoscopic, radiological, and laboratory disease activity. Patients with clinically active disease had lower IFX concentrations than patients in remission.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), data on trough concentration (TC) response to adjustments of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNFα) are scarce. METHODS: We included pediatric patients with IBD who were treated with anti-TNFα agents and had sequential monitoring of TC pre- and post-adjustment. Patients with positive anti-drug-antibodies or with concomitant change in immunomodulatory treatment were excluded. RESULTS: For the entire cohort (86 patients), median age at diagnosis was 13.2 (interquartile range, 10.7-14.9) years [females, 48%; Crohn disease (CD), 72%]. For infliximab, 58 patients had 201 interval changes and 26 had dose increase. Increase in TC following dose increase could not be predicted due to significant variability (P = 0.9). For every 10% decrease in interval, TC was increased by 1.6 µg/mL or by 57.2% (P = 0.014). Perianal disease was associated with attenuated response. For every 10% increase in interval, TC was decreased by 0.66 µg/mL or by 4.2%. The diagnosis of CD was associated with reduced response to interval increase. For adalimumab, 28 patients had 31 and 12 events of interval decrease or increase, respectively. Interval decrease resulted in increased median TC from 4.5 (3.5-5.3) µg/mL to 8.1 (6.5-10.5) µg/mL (X1.8) while interval increase resulted in TC change from 15.5 (12.8-18.6) µg/mL to 9.7 (6.5-14.6) µg/mL (:1.6) (P < 0.001 for both). Increase in delta TC was associated with younger age, and with absence of perianal disease (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Changes in TC following treatment adjustment can be almost linearly predicted for adalimumab while response to infliximab adjustment are more variable.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCCIÓN: La enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII), enfermedad de Crohn (EC) y colitis ulcerosa (CU), es una patología de incidencia creciente que impacta notablemente sobre la calidad de vida de los pacientes. Dentro del arsenal terapéutico para la EII se encuentran los inhibidores del factor de necrosis tumoral (anti-TNF), siendo el infliximab y el adalimumab los más empleados. Sus beneficios son mejoría sintomática, cicatrización de lesiones y disminución de complicaciones, lo cual implica reducción de hospitalizaciones, intervenciones quirúrgicas y mejoría de la calidad de vida del paciente con un buen perfil de seguridad y coste-efectividad. Sus limitaciones son la falta de respuesta primaria y la pérdida de respuesta, situaciones en las que la medición de los niveles plasmáticos del fármaco o su monitorización con intención terapéutica (Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, TDM) podría ayudar a decidir la mejor actitud y a identificar pacientes respondedores susceptibles de recibir menores dosis. Así, la determinación de niveles de fármaco anti-TNF y de sus anticuerpos se podría utilizar a través de dos estrategias posibles: la proactiva (determinación de niveles de fármaco, con cierta periodicidad, en todos los pacientes en tratamiento para ajustar la dosis) y la reactiva (determinación de niveles de fármaco solo en caso de pérdida de respuesta al tratamiento). OBJETIVOS: Analizar la eficacia, seguridad y coste-efectividad en el SNS de la determinación de niveles plasmáticos de fármacos biológicos (infliximab, adalimumab) en enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. MÉTODOS: Tras la definición de las preguntas de investigación se definieron varias estrategias de búsqueda bibliográfica para diferentes bases de datos (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL y Cochrane Library). La selección, depuración y síntesis de la información se realizó por duplicado y en caso de duda, esta fue resulta por consenso. Para la evaluación de la calidad de las revisiones sistemáticas empleamos la herramienta AMSTAR 2, para los ensayos clínicos la escala ROB 2 desarrollada por la Colaboración Cochrane y para los estudios observacionales controlados la herramienta Robins-I. La síntesis de la evidencia se realizó utilizando la metodología GRADE con la herramienta GRADE-Pro. RESULTADOS: Resultados de efectividad: TDM reactiva no demostró ser superior a la optimización empírica en cuanto a la obtención y mantenimiento de la respuesta clínica de la EII, aunque sí demostró que el empleo de esta estrategia se relacionaba con un menor desarrollo de anticuerpos frente al fármaco y era más coste-efectiva. Resultados en seguridad: no se observan diferencias entre la TDM proactiva y reactiva en cuanto al mantenimiento de la remisión clínica, aunque la TDM proactiva podría aumentar la durabilidad del tratamiento y la seguridad del mismo, evitando reacciones infusionales agudas, aparición de anticuerpos antifármaco e incluso disminuyendo la probabilidad de cirugía. IDEAS CLAVE: 1. No se han encontrado suficientes ensayos clínicos de buena calidad dirigidos a estudiar el beneficio de la TDM reactiva frente a la optimización empírica del tratamiento anti-TNF para el mantenimiento de la remisión clínica en pacientes con Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal. 2. En los casos en los que se evidencie una pérdida de respuesta al tratamiento, la TDM reactiva podría ser útil para disminuir los costes asociados al tratamiento con anti-TNF. También podría evitar reacciones infusionales agudas y la aparición de anticuerpos, optimizando el tratamiento anti-TNF y reduciendo el uso innecesario de estos fármacos, lo que aumentaría su coste-eficacia. 3. Se sugiere el desarrollo de ensayos clínicos dirigidos a conocer los beneficios de la TDM reactiva. 4. Los estudios analizados muestran que la TDM proactiva no parece ser superior a la optimización empírica del tratamiento anti-TNF para el mantenimiento de la remisión clínica en pacientes con EII.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a pathology with increasing incidence that significantly impacts the quality of life of patients. Within the therapeutic arsenal for IBD are tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) inhibitors, with infliximab and adalimumab being the most widely used. Its benefits are symptomatic improvement, wound healing and reduction of complications, which implies reduction of hospitalizations, surgical interventions and improvement of the patient's quality of life with a good safety and cost-effectiveness profile. Its limitations are the lack of primary response and the loss of response, situations in which the measurement of the plasmatic levels of the drug or its Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) could help to decide the best therapeutic attitude and to identify patients responders susceptible to receiving lower doses. Thus, the determination of anti-TNF drug levels and its antibodies could be used through two possible strategies: proactive (determination of drug levels, with a certain periodicity, in all patients undergoing treatment to adjust the dose) and the reactive (determination of drug levels only in case of loss of response to treatment). AIMS: To analyze the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness in the SNS of tests aimed at determining the plasmatic levels of biological drugs (infliximab, adalimumab) in inflammatory bowel disease. RESULTS: Effectiveness results: reactive TDM did not prove to be superior to empirical optimization in terms of obtaining and maintaining clinical response to IBD, although it did demonstrate that the use of this strategy was associated with less development of antibodies against the drug and it was more cost-effective. Safety results: no differences were observed between proactive and reactive TDM in terms of maintenance of clinical remission, although proactive TDM could increase the durability of treatment and its safety, avoiding acute infusion reactions, the appearance of antidrug antibodies and even decreasing the probability of surgery. KEY IDEAS: 1. Not enough good quality clinical trials have been found to study the benefit of reactive TDM versus empirical optimization of antiTNF treatment for the maintenance of clinical remission in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. 2. In cases where there is evidence of a loss of response to treatment, reactive TDM could be useful to reduce the costs associated with anti-TNF treatment. It could also prevent acute infusion reactions and the appearance of antibodies, optimizing anti-TNF treatment and reducing the unnecessary use of these drugs, which would increase their cost-effectiveness. 3. The development of clinical trials aimed at discovering the benefits of the Therapeutic Monitoring of Reactive Drugs is suggested. 4. The studies analyzed show that proactive TDM does not seem to be superior to empirical optimization of anti-TNF treatment for the maintenance of clinical remission in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Biologic drugs have greatly improved treatment outcomes of inflammatory joint diseases, but a substantial proportion of patients either do not respond to treatment or lose response over time. Drug immunogenicity, manifested as the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAb), constitute a significant clinical problem. Anti-drug antibodies influence the pharmacokinetics of the drug, are associated with reduced clinical efficacy, and an increased risk of adverse events such as infusion reactions. The prevalence of ADAb differs among drugs and diseases, and the detection of ADAb also depends on the assay format. Most data exist for the tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors infliximab and adalimumab, with a frequency of ADAb that ranges from 10 to 60% across studies. Measurement of ADAb and serum drug concentrations, therapeutic drug monitoring, has been suggested as a strategy to optimize therapy with biologic drugs. Although the recent randomized clinical Norwegian Drug Monitoring (NOR-DRUM) trials show promise towards a personalized medicine prescribing approach by therapeutic drug monitoring, several challenges remain. A plethora of assay formats, with widely differing properties, is currently used for measuring ADAb. Comparing results between different assays and laboratories is difficult, which complicates the development of cut-offs necessary for guidelines and the implementation of ADAb measurements in clinical practice. With the possible exception of infliximab, limited data on clinical relevance and cost effectiveness exist to support therapeutic drug monitoring as a routine clinical strategy to monitor biologic drugs in inflammatory joint diseases. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the characteristics and prevalence of ADAb, predisposing factors to ADAb formation, commonly used assessment methods, clinical consequences of ADAb, and the potential implications of ADAb assessments for everyday treatment of inflammatory joint diseases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Infliximab dosage de-escalation without prior knowledge of drug concentrations may put patients at risk for underexposure and trigger the loss of response. A single-model approach for model-informed precision dosing during infliximab maintenance therapy has proven its clinical benefit in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. We evaluated the predictive performances of two multi-model approaches, a model selection algorithm and a model averaging algorithm, using 18 published population pharmacokinetic models of infliximab for guiding dosage de-escalation. Data of 54 patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis who underwent infliximab dosage de-escalation after an earlier escalation were used. A priori prediction (based solely on covariate data) and maximum a posteriori prediction (based on covariate data and trough concentrations) were compared using accuracy and precision metrics and the classification accuracy at the trough concentration target of 5.0 mg/L. A priori prediction was inaccurate and imprecise, with the lowest classification accuracies irrespective of the approach (median 59%, interquartile range 59%-63%). Using the maximum a posteriori prediction, the model averaging algorithm had systematically better predictive performance than the model selection algorithm or the single-model approach with any model, regardless of the number of concentration data. Only a single trough concentration (preferably at the point of care) sufficed for accurate and precise prediction. Predictive performance of both single- and multi-model approaches was robust to the lack of covariate data. Model averaging using four models demonstrated similar predictive performance with a five-fold shorter computation time. This model averaging algorithm was implemented in the TDMx software tool to guide infliximab dosage de-escalation in the forthcoming prospective MODIFI study (NCT04982172).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Up to 60% of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with infliximab develop antibodies to infliximab (ATI), which are associated with low drug levels and loss of response (LOR). Hence, mapping out predictors of immunogenicity toward infliximab is essential for tailoring patient-specific therapy. Jewish Sephardi ethnicity, in addition to monotherapy, has been previously identified as a potential risk factor for ATI formation and infliximab failure. OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between Jewish sub-group ethnicity among patients with IBD and the risk of infliximab immunogenicity and therapy failure. To confirm findings of a previous cohort that addressed the same question. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all infliximab-treated patients of Jewish ethnicity with regular prospective measurements of infliximab trough levels and ATI. Drug and ATI levels were prospectively measured, clinical data was retrieved from medical charts. RESULTS: The study comprised 109 Jewish patients (54 Ashkenazi, 55 Sephardi) treated with infliximab. There was no statistically significant difference in proportion of ATI between Sephardi and Ashkenazi patients with IBD (32% Ashkenazi and 33% Sephardi patients developed ATI, odds ratio [OR] 0.944, P = 0.9). Of all variables explored, monotherapy and older age were the only factors associated with ATI formation (OR 0.336, 95% confidence interval 0.145-0.778, P = 0.01, median 34 vs. 28, interquartile range 28-48, 23-35 years, P = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous findings, Sephardi Jewish ethnicity was not identified as a risk factor for ATI formation compared with Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity. Other risk factors remained unchanged.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Infliximab (IFX) therapy has considerably improved the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, some patients still do not respond adequately to IFX therapy, or the efficacy of the treatment diminishes over time. Although previous studies have reported a relationship between serum IFX levels and therapeutic efficacy, the potential applications of IFX therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in clinical practice remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential applications of IFX TDM by analyzing a Japanese cohort database. Data were collected retrospectively from the Kyoto University Rheumatoid Arthritis Management Alliance cohort between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2018. Serum IFX levels were measured using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometer. Out of the 311 RA patients that used IFX, 41 were eligible for the analysis. Serum IFX levels were significantly higher in responders than in non-responders. An optimal cut-off value was determined to be 0.32 µg/mL based on a receiver operating characteristic curve. At the IFX measurement point, a better therapeutic response was observed in the high IFX group (n = 32) than in the low IFX group (n = 9). Conversely, at the maximum effect point, when DAS28-ESR was the lowest between IFX introduction and measurement points, there were no differences in responder proportions between the low and high IFX groups. IFX primary ineffectiveness could be avoided with appropriate dose escalation without blood concentration measurement in clinical practice. In conclusion, IFX TDM could facilitate the identification of secondary non-responders and in turn, proper IFX use.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The efficacy of infliximab in treating rheumatoid arthritis depends on its serum trough concentration, which must be maintained at a minimum of 1 µg/mL to achieve the desired effects. However, Japan's National Health Insurance system does not cover tests for rheumatoid arthritis patients undergoing treatment with biosimilar infliximab because its performance as a biosimilar remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether the Remi-check Q qualitative assay yields comparable results for biosimilar infliximab and the originator product. Infliximab BS 100 "NK" and Remicade 100® were separately diluted in pooled human serum to yield test samples at the following concentrations: 0.30, 0.70, 1.20, and 3.00 µg/mL. Prepared samples were quantitatively assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and qualitatively using Remi-check Q, and the results obtained for the originator and biosimilar product were compared. For both originator and biosimilar infliximab, Remi-check Q yielded a negative result for all 0.30 and 0.70 µg/mL samples and a positive result for all 3.00 µg/mL samples. However, negative results were obtained with a fraction of the 1.20 µg/mL samples (biosimilar, 4/15; originator, 3/15). Concurrence rates between the results of quantitative ELISA and qualitative Remi-check Q analyses were comparable between originator and biosimilar infliximab at all tested concentrations. These results indicate that Remi-check Q yields comparable results for biosimilar infliximab and the originator product on being used as a qualitative assay for trough serum levels.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The FcγRIIA/CD32A is mainly expressed on platelets, myeloid and several endothelial cells. Its affinity is considered insufficient for allowing significant binding of monomeric IgG, while its H131R polymorphism (histidine > arginine at position 131) influences affinity for multimeric IgG2. Platelet FcγRIIA has been reported to contribute to IgG-containing immune-complexe clearance. Given our finding that platelet FcγRIIA actually binds monomeric IgG, we investigated the role of platelets and FcγRIIA in IgG antibody elimination. We used pharmacokinetics analysis of infliximab (IgG1) in individuals with controlled Crohn's disease. The influence of platelet count and FcγRIIA polymorphism was quantified by multivariate linear modelling. The infliximab half-life increased with R allele number (13.2, 14.4 and 15.6 days for HH, HR and RR patients, respectively). It decreased with increasing platelet count in R carriers: from ≈20 days (RR) and ≈17 days (HR) at 150 × 109/L, respectively, to ≈13 days (both HR and RR) at 350 × 109/L. Moreover, a flow cytometry assay showed that infliximab and monomeric IgG1 bound efficiently to platelet FcγRIIA H and R allotypes, whereas panitumumab and IgG2 bound poorly to the latter. We propose that infliximab (and presumably any IgG1 antibody) elimination is partly due to an unappreciated mechanism dependent on binding to platelet FcγRIIA, which is probably tuned by its affinity for IgG2.

Asunto(s)