Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.862
Filtrar
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 923, 2024 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39237903

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bone and joint infections represent a major public health issue due to their increasing prevalence, their functional prognosis and their cost to society. Phage therapy has valuable anti-biofilm properties against prosthetic joint infections (PJI). The aim of this study was to establish the proportion of patients eligible for phage therapy and to assess their clinical outcome judged against all patients presenting with PJI. METHOD: . Patients admitted for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) at a French general hospital between 2015 and 2019 were retrospectively included. Eligibility for phage therapy was determined based on French recommendations, with polymicrobial infections serving as exclusion criteria. Patients were categorized into two groups: those eligible and those ineligible for phage therapy. We analyzed their characteristics and outcomes, including severe adverse events, duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy, length of hospitalization, and relapse rates. RESULTS: . In this study, 96 patients with PJI were considered in multidisciplinary medical meetings. Of these, 44% patients (42/96) were eligible for additional phage therapy. This group of patients had a longer duration of intravenous therapy (17 days vs. 10 days, p = 0.02), more severe adverse events (11 vs. 3, p = 0.08) and had a longer hospital stay (43 days vs. 18 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: . A large number of patients met eligibility criteria for phage therapy and treatment and follow-up is more complex. A larger epidemiological study would more accurately describe the prognosis of eligible patients.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Terapia de Fagos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Anciano , Francia/epidemiología , Terapia de Fagos/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tiempo de Internación
2.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 648, 2024 Aug 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39152412

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fungal periprosthetic joint infection (FPJI) is an infrequent but devastating complication that imposes a heavy burden on patients. At present, a consensus regarding the most optimal surgical option for patients with FPJI, the ideal duration of systemic antifungal treatment, and many other issues has not been reached. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed on the PubMed and Embase databases. The search criteria employed were as follows: (fungal OR candida OR mycotic) AND periprosthetic joint infection. Initially, the titles and abstracts were screened, and subsequently, studies deemed irrelevant or duplicative were eliminated. Following this, the complete texts of remaining articles were thoroughly examined. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 489 joints in 24 articles were screened out. We further extracted the demographic characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, etc.), clinical presentation, fungal species, presence of bacterial coinfection, surgical methods, systemic and local antifungal therapy, and treatment outcomes. Subgroup data were analyzed according to fungal species and bacterial coinfection. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to ascertain the risk factors associated with the infection recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 506 fungi were identified within 489 joints. The most prevalent fungal species were Candida albicans (41.5%). Out of 247 joints (50.5%) presenting with concurrent fungal and bacterial infections. Among the initial surgical interventions, two-stage exchange was the most common (59.1%). The infection recurrence rates of DAIR, resection arthroplasty, two-stage, one-stage, and three-stage exchange were 81.4%, 53.1%, 47.7%, 35.0%, and 30%, respectively. The mean duration of systemic antifungal therapy was 12.8 weeks. The most common drugs used both in intravenous (55.9%) and oral therapy (84.0%) were fluconazole. The proportion of patients who used antifungal drugs after replantation (two-stage and three-stage) was 87.6%. 33.2% of cement spacer or fixed cement contained antifungal drugs, of which amphotericin B was the main choice (82.7%). FPJI caused by candida albicans (OR = 1.717, p = 0.041) and DAIR (OR = 8.433, p = 0.003) were risk factors for infection recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage exchange remains the most commonly used surgical approach. The reliability of one- and three-exchange needs further evaluation due to the small sample size. Antifungal-loaded cement spacers, and direct intra-articular injections of antimycotics after reimplatation should be strongly considered. Medication is not standardized but rather individualized according to microbiology and the status of patients.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos , Micosis , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/administración & dosificación , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Micosis/epidemiología , Micosis/microbiología , Micosis/terapia , Micosis/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
BMJ Open Qual ; 13(3)2024 Aug 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39174036

RESUMEN

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) following total joint arthroplasty are a significant and costly complication. To address fragmented care typically seen with separate management, we established a combined infectious disease and orthopaedic surgery clinic at Duke Health in July 2020. This clinic focuses on patients experiencing acute deterioration or multiple PJI episodes, often at the stage where amputation is the only option offered. From July 2021 to March 2024, the clinic completed 974 visits with 319 unique patients. The clinic maintained a low no-show rate of 5.0%. Treatment plans included procedures such as debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (38%), as well as implant explantation and one-stage exchange (32% each), with amputation required in only 4% of cases. The integrated clinic model facilitated real-time, multidisciplinary care, improving patient outcomes and operational efficiency. This approach offers a promising model for managing complex infections.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Desbridamiento/métodos , Desbridamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Transmisibles/terapia
5.
Kyobu Geka ; 77(6): 450-453, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39009540

RESUMEN

A 69-year-old woman was diagnosed with a pacemaker infection after generator-exchange. Eight years ago, she underwent mitral and tricuspid valve replacement and had biventricular pacing with three pairs of epicardial leads placed in the right atrium, right ventricle, and left ventricle for left ventricular dysfunction. Skin perforation due to infection was detected 1 month after generator-exchange. At first, antibiotic treatment, generator-re-exchange, and pocket repositioning surgery were performed. Following all these failed attempts, a temporary pacemaker was placed, the infected generator was removed, and the lead was cut short. Eight days later, new intravenous caradiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) implantation was performed. However, despite the repeat debridement, infection at the lead stumps recurred. Moreover, plain chest computed tomography (CT) revealed an abscess around the leads in the anterior mediastinum. Eventually, leads were removed under extracorporeal circulation via re-sternotomy. Postoperative course was uneventful, and she has been doing well without recurrence of infection for 6 years after operation.


Asunto(s)
Marcapaso Artificial , Esternotomía , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia
6.
J Infect ; 89(2): 106197, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879134

RESUMEN

Implant-based reconstructions are increasingly utilized following mastectomy in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer. However, these implants are associated with a high rate of infection, which is a major complication that can lead to implant removal, delay in adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy, and increase in health care costs. Early clinical signs and symptoms of infection, such as erythema, warmth, and tenderness, are challenging to discern from expected postsurgical responses. Furthermore, when atypical features are present or the patient's condition does not improve on adequate antimicrobials, the clinician should be prompted to consider an alternative noninfectious etiology. Herein we highlight the key elements of the preventive, diagnostic, and multidisciplinary therapeutic approach to salvaging the infected breast implant; review several infectious disease mimickers; and provide many pearls of wisdom that the practicing clinician must be familiar with and be able to manage in an effective and successful manner.


Asunto(s)
Implantes de Mama , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Femenino , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Mastectomía
7.
Int J Cardiol ; 411: 132264, 2024 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38878871

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Complete removal of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is recommended in patients with CIED infections, including both systemic and localized pocket infection. The aim of the study was to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive assessment of evidence relating to the effect of complete CIED extraction in patients with a CIED infection. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting short- and mid-term outcomes in patients who had a device infection or infective endocarditis (IE) and underwent complete removal of the cardiac device (generator and leads) compared to those who received conservative therapy (no removal, partial removal, local antibiotic infiltration or isolated antibiotic therapy). The primary outcome was reinfection/relapse. Secondary outcomes were short-term (30-day/in-hospital) and mid-term (mean follow-up: 43.0 months) mortality. Random effects model was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies met the criteria for inclusion in the final analysis. Patients with complete CIED extraction (n = 905) exhibited a lower rate of relapse/re-infection compared to patients (n = 195) with a conservative treatment approach (n = 195, OR 0.02, 95%CI 0.01-0.06, p < 0.0001, mean-follow-up: 16.1 months). Additionally, these patients displayed a lower short- (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.23-0.69, p = 0.01) and mid-term (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.34-0.78, p = 0.002) mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis indicates that patients with a CIED infection who undergo complete CIED extraction exhibit a lower rate of relapse/re-infection. Additionally, a lower short- and mid-term mortality is observed, although it is acknowledged that this outcome may be influenced by treatment allocation bias.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Remoción de Dispositivos , Marcapaso Artificial , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
8.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 106(13): 1197-1204, 2024 Jul 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723046

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The role of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as tools for monitoring the impact and outcomes of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is not well described. This study analyzed the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) or Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in a prospective observational cohort of patients with hip or knee PJI. METHODS: The PIANO (Prosthetic joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand, Observational study) cohort prospectively enrolled patients with newly diagnosed PJI from multiple centers. The OHS and OKS were evaluated at PJI diagnosis (baseline) and at 3, 12, and 24 months. Scores and score changes were examined according to PJI type, patient characteristics, and management. A successful functional outcome at 12 months was defined as an OHS of >38 or OHS of >36 and/or an improvement from baseline of >12 or >9, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 741 participants, PROMs were available at 12 months for 233 with hip and 342 with knee PJI. Significant improvements (p < 0.0001) were seen at 12 months for both the OHS (24.5 to 36) and OKS (25 to 34), with no further improvement at 24 months. Patients with late-acute PJI had a higher median baseline OHS (35; interquartile range [22 to 46]) and OKS (30 [18 to 41]) than those with early PJI (OHS: 19 [15 to 29]; OKS: 22 [16 to 29.5]) or chronic PJI (OHS: 23 [14 to 34]; OKS 22 [14 to 28]). Logistic regression showed that a clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28 to 2.76, p = 0.001) and early PJI (aOR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.64 to 4.07, p < 0.0001) independently predicted a successful functional outcome. Chronic renal impairment (aOR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.71, p = 0.007), congestive cardiac failure (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.95, p = 0.04), and clinical signs of inflammation (aOR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.85, p = 0.009) at diagnosis independently predicted failure to achieve a successful functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The OHS and OKS varied significantly at baseline and 12 months according to PJI type, emphasizing the need to consider the PJI type when evaluating treatment success. This study highlights superior functional outcomes associated with early PJI and with achievement of a clinical cure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Longitudinales , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Australia , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Nueva Zelanda , Anciano de 80 o más Años
9.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(5)2024 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38792972

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Despite the promise of phage therapy (PT), its efficacy in prosthetic joint infection (PJI) management is unknown. Much of the current literature is largely limited to case reports and series. Materials and Methods: In order to help inform power calculations for future clinical trials and comparative analyses, we performed a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of early PT outcomes to provide a preliminary assessment of early phage therapy treatment outcomes for cases of PJI. Results: In a search of available literature across MEDLINE (Ovid, Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands), Embase (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), the Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate, London, UK), and Cochrane Central (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA) up to 23 September 2023, we identified 37 patients with PJIs receiving adjunctive PT. Patients most frequently reported Staphylococcal species infection (95%) and intraarticular phage delivery (73%). Phage cocktail (65%) and antibiotic co-administration (97%) were common. A random-effects proportional meta-analysis suggested infection remission in 78% of patients (95% CI: 39%, 95%) (I2 = 55%, p = 0.08) and 83% with a minimum 12-month follow-up (95% CI: 53%, 95%) (I2 = 26%, p = 0.26). Conclusions: Our study provides a preliminary estimate of PT's efficacy in PJIs and informs future comparative studies.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Fagos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Terapia de Fagos/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 43(7): 1039-1050, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38691077

RESUMEN

Infections remain a significant concern in patients receiving mechanical circulatory support (MCS), encompassing both durable and acute devices. This consensus manuscript provides updated definitions for infections associated with durable MCS devices and new definitions for infections in acute MCS, integrating a comprehensive review of existing literature and collaborative discussions among multidisciplinary specialists. By establishing consensus definitions, we seek to enhance clinical care, facilitate consistent reporting in research studies, and ultimately improve outcomes for patients receiving MCS.


Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Sociedades Médicas , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Trasplante de Corazón-Pulmón , Consenso
11.
Bone Joint J ; 106-B(5): 425-429, 2024 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689572

RESUMEN

Chondrosarcoma is the second most common surgically treated primary bone sarcoma. Despite a large number of scientific papers in the literature, there is still significant controversy about diagnostics, treatment of the primary tumour, subtypes, and complications. Therefore, consensus on its day-to-day treatment decisions is needed. In January 2024, the Birmingham Orthopaedic Oncology Meeting (BOOM) attempted to gain global consensus from 300 delegates from over 50 countries. The meeting focused on these critical areas and aimed to generate consensus statements based on evidence amalgamation and expert opinion from diverse geographical regions. In parallel, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in oncological reconstructions poses unique challenges due to factors such as adjuvant treatments, large exposures, and the complexity of surgery. The meeting debated two-stage revisions, antibiotic prophylaxis, managing acute PJI in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and defining the best strategies for wound management and allograft reconstruction. The objectives of the meeting extended beyond resolving immediate controversies. It sought to foster global collaboration among specialists attending the meeting, and to encourage future research projects to address unsolved dilemmas. By highlighting areas of disagreement and promoting collaborative research endeavours, this initiative aims to enhance treatment standards and potentially improve outcomes for patients globally. This paper sets out some of the controversies and questions that were debated in the meeting.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Condrosarcoma , Humanos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Condrosarcoma/terapia , Oncología Médica , Ortopedia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Reoperación
12.
Curr Cardiol Rep ; 26(7): 767-775, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806975

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores the epidemiology, clinical traits, and diagnosis of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Associated Infective Endocarditis (TAVR-IE) and mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair infective endocarditis (TEER-IE), focusing on a multimodal imaging approach. It addresses the rising prevalence of TAVR and TEER, emphasizing the need to understand long-term complications and clinical consequences, which poses significant challenges despite advancements in valve technology. RECENT FINDINGS: Studies report a variable incidence of TAVR-IE and TEER-IE influenced by diverse patient risk profiles and procedural factors. Younger age, male gender, and certain comorbidities emerge as patient-related risk factors. Procedure-related factors include intervention location, valve type, and technical aspects. Microbiologically, Staphylococcus aureus, Viridans Group Streptococcus, and Enterococcus are frequently encountered pathogens. TAVR-IE and TEER-IE diagnosis involves a multimodal imaging approach due to limitations in echocardiography. Blood cultures and imaging aid identification, with Fluorescence in situ hybridization is showing promise. Treatment encompasses medical management with antibiotics and, when necessary, surgical intervention. The management approach requires a multidisciplinary "Endocarditis Team." This review underscores the need for continued research to refine risk prediction, enhance diagnostic accuracy, and optimize management strategies for TAVR-IE, considering the evolving landscape of transcatheter interventions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/microbiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/microbiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/etiología , Endocarditis Bacteriana/terapia , Endocarditis/microbiología , Endocarditis/etiología
13.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 32(16): 728-737, 2024 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38759226

RESUMEN

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a dreaded complication that may lead to catastrophic outcomes. Risk factors include a history of surgery on the operated ankle, low preoperative function scores, diabetes, extended surgical time, and postoperative wound-healing problems. Clinical presentation varies and may include increasing ankle pain and swelling, high temperature, local erythema, wound drainage, and dehiscence. The initial diagnostic evaluation should include plain radiographs, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein levels, and leukocyte count. In suspected cases with elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, aspiration of the ankle joint for synovial fluid analysis, Gram staining, and culture should be performed. Antibiotic therapy should be based on the pathogen identified, and the surgical strategy should be determined based on the time lines of PJI. Early PJI can be treated with irrigation and débridement with polyethylene exchange. The surgical treatment of choice for late PJI is two-stage revision arthroplasty, which includes removal of the implant, insertion of an antibiotic spacer, and reimplantation of a TAA. In certain chronic PJI cases, permanent articulating antibiotic spacers can be left in place or an ankle arthrodesis can be performed. Below-knee amputation is considered as the final option after limb-sparing procedures have failed.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo , Desbridamiento , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Tobillo/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Reoperación , Factores de Riesgo , Irrigación Terapéutica , Articulación del Tobillo/cirugía
14.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 83(15): 1418-1430, 2024 Apr 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599718

RESUMEN

During the past 6 decades, there have been numerous changes in prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), currently affecting an older population and increasing in incidence in patients with transcatheter-implanted valves. Significant microbiologic (molecular biology) and imaging diagnostic (fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography) advances have been incorporated into the 2023 Duke-International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases infective endocarditis diagnostic criteria, thus increasing the diagnostic sensitivity for PVE without sacrificing specificity in validation studies. PVE is a life-threatening disease requiring management by multidisciplinary endocarditis teams in cardiac centers to improve outcomes. Novel surgical options are now available, and an increasing set of patients may avoid surgical intervention despite indication. Selected patients may complete parenteral or oral antimicrobial treatment at home. Finally, patients with prosthetic valves implanted surgically or by the transcatheter approach are candidates for antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures.


Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/terapia , Endocarditis Bacteriana/complicaciones , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Endocarditis/diagnóstico , Endocarditis/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos
15.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 32(7): 1766-1774, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38643391

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the superior spacer design, a growing number of studies are comparing treatment results between patients having been treated with articulating and static knee spacers in the setting of two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). In contrast, the primary objective of this study was to compare preoperative characteristics between patients from both spacer groups and examine whether significant differences were present prior to spacer implantation. METHODS: This retrospective, single-centre, cohort study examined the preoperative situation of 80 consecutive knee PJIs between 2017 and 2020. All patients underwent two-stage revision, with 35 (44%) receiving an articulating and 45 (56%) a static spacer. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in terms of patient gender (p = 0.083), age (p = 0.666), comorbidity (p = 0.1) and preoperative clinical function (p = 0.246). Static spacers were significantly more often used in the presence of a periarticular fistula (p = 0.033), infection of a revision implant (p < 0.001), higher degree of bone loss (p < 0.001) and infection caused by a difficult-to-treat pathogen (p = 0.038). Complication and revision rates were similar for both spacer types during the interim period, while patients with articulating spacers demonstrated a superior clinical function (p < 0.001) during the interim period and after reimplantation. CONCLUSION: Static spacers are being utilised in significantly more complex and unfavourable preoperative scenarios. Therefore, a preoperative selection bias may be at least partially accountable for any disparities observed in postoperative outcomes. To achieve the best possible results, surgeons should know and respect the distinct indications of static and articulating spacers and consequently understand and use them as complementary surgical options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Prótesis de la Rodilla , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Reoperación , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Anciano , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Anciano de 80 o más Años
16.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging ; 17(4): e016435, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626096

RESUMEN

Heart valve replacement has steadily increased over the past decades due to improved surgical mortality, an aging population, and the increasing use of transcatheter valve technology. With these developments, prosthetic valve complications, including prosthetic valve endocarditis, are increasingly encountered. In this review, we aim to characterize the manifestations of prosthetic valve endocarditis using representative case studies from our institution to highlight the advances and contributions of modern multimodality imaging techniques.


Asunto(s)
Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Humanos , Anciano , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico por imagen , Endocarditis Bacteriana/terapia , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Endocarditis/diagnóstico por imagen , Endocarditis/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Imagen Multimodal , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia
19.
Laryngoscope ; 134(9): 4122-4125, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38506413

RESUMEN

This is the first description of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) use in rescuing alloplastic ear reconstructions. Previously considered a sign of certain impending failure, severe infections with frank purulence can be salvaged. As a more recently developed technique, porous polyethylene (PPE) ear reconstruction provides benefits when compared to rib techniques. Increasing surgeon awareness of complication management may lead to further adoption of the technique and improve reconstructive results. Described herein are two cases of draining infections following PPE ear reconstruction that were salvaged with satisfactory results. Laryngoscope, 134:4122-4125, 2024.


Asunto(s)
Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Terapia Recuperativa , Humanos , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas/métodos , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/etiología , Femenino , Polietileno , Adulto
20.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 36(6)2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38446027
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA