RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This retrospective real-world study compared overall survival (OS) between patients with BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) who received niraparib second-line maintenance (2LM) versus active surveillance (AS) using target trial emulation, cloning, inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) methodology to minimize immortal time bias. METHODS: Eligible patients from a United States-based, deidentified, electronic health record-derived database were diagnosed with epithelial OC (January 1, 2011-May 31, 2021), were BRCAwt, and completed second-line (2L) therapy (January 1, 2017-March 2, 2022). Patient data were cloned at index (2L last treatment date), assigned to niraparib 2LM and AS cohorts, and censored when treatment deviated from clone assignment. Follow-up was measured from index to earliest of study end (May 31, 2022), last activity, or death. Median OS (mOS) and hazard ratios were estimated from stabilized IPCW Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 199 patients received niraparib 2LM, and 707 had their care managed with AS. Key characteristics were balanced across cohorts after cloning and stabilized IPCW. Median follow-up was 15.6- and 9.3-months pre-cloning. IPCW mOS was 24.1 months (95% CI: 20.9-29.5) and 18.4 months (95% CI: 15.1-22.8) in niraparib 2LM and AS cohorts, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI: 0.66-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study provides supportive evidence of an OS benefit for patients with BRCAwt recurrent OC who received 2LM niraparib monotherapy compared with those whose care was managed with AS. The analytic strategies implemented were useful in minimizing immortal time bias and measured confounding.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Humanos , Femenino , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/mortalidad , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Espera Vigilante , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodos , Bases de Datos FactualesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer. METHODS: This was the follow-up analysis of a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in Japanese women with homologous recombination-deficient, platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had completed 3-4 lines of chemotherapy and were poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor naïve. Participants received niraparib (starting dose, 300 mg) once daily in continuous 28-day cycles until objective disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR), as assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Safety evaluations included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: 20 patients were enrolled in the study and included in both efficacy and safety analyses. Median total study duration was 759.5 days. Median dose intensity was 201.3 mg/day. Confirmed ORR was 60.0% (90% confidence interval [CI]=39.4-78.3); 2 patients had complete response and 10 patients had partial response. Median duration of response was 9.9 months (95% CI=3.9-26.9) and the disease control rate was 90.0% (95% CI=68.3-98.8). The most common TEAEs were anemia (n=15), nausea (n=12), and decreased platelet count (n=11). TEAEs leading to study drug dose reduction, interruption, or discontinuation were reported in 16 (80.0%), 15 (75.0%), and 2 patients (10.0%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The long-term efficacy and safety profile of niraparib was consistent with previous findings in the equivalent population in non-Japanese patients. No new safety signals were identified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759600.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Anciano , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Japón , Ftalazinas/efectos adversos , Ftalazinas/administración & dosificación , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de las Trompas Uterinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Recombinación Homóloga , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: MAGNITUDE (NCT03748641) demonstrated favourable outcomes with niraparib plus abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (+AAP) versus placebo+AAP in patients with BRCA1/2-altered metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Imbalances in prognostic variables were reported between arms, which impacts estimation of both the clinical benefit and costeffectiveness of niraparib+AAP for healthcare systems. A pre-specified multivariable analysis (MVA) demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) with niraparib+AAP. Here, we used an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) model to adjust for covariate imbalances and assess time-to-event outcomes. METHODS: IPTW analysis of time-to-event outcomes was conducted using data from patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC (N = 225) in MAGNITUDE. Patients received niraparib+AAP or placebo+AAP. OS, radiographic progression-free survival, time to symptomatic progression, time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy and time to prostate-specific antigen progression were assessed. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for each endpoint, and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were obtained from a weighted Cox model. RESULTS: Improvements in survival outcomes were estimated for niraparib+AAP versus placebo+AAP: unadjusted median OS was 30.4 months versus 28.6 months, respectively (HR: 0.79; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.55, 1.12; p = 0.183). Following IPTW, median OS increased to 34.1 months with niraparib+AAP versus a decrease to 27.4 with placebo (HR: 0.65; 95 % CI: 0.46, 0.93; p = 0.017). Similar improvements were observed for other time-to-event endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: IPTW adjustment provided a more precise estimate of the clinical benefit of niraparib+AAP versus placebo+AAP in patients with BRCA1/2-altered mCRPC. Results were consistent with the pre-specified MVA, and further demonstrated the value of adjusting for baseline imbalances, particularly in smaller studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03748641 (MAGNITUDE).
Asunto(s)
Acetato de Abiraterona , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Indazoles , Piperidinas , Prednisona , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Humanos , Masculino , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Acetato de Abiraterona/administración & dosificación , Acetato de Abiraterona/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/mortalidad , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Doble Ciego , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy-based combinations have emerged as standard therapies for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, combined with epacadostat, an indoleamine 2,3-deoxygenase 1 selective inhibitor, demonstrated promising antitumor activity in a phase 1 study in advanced solid tumors, including mRCC. METHODS: KEYNOTE-679/ECHO-302 was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 study (NCT03260894) that compared pembrolizumab plus epacadostat with sunitinib or pazopanib as first-line treatment for mRCC. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic clear cell RCC and had not received systemic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks plus epacadostat 100 mg orally twice daily versus sunitinib 50 mg orally once daily (4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off treatment) or pazopanib 800 mg orally once daily. Original dual primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. Enrollment was stopped when a phase 3 study in melanoma of pembrolizumab plus epacadostat compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy did not meet its primary end point. This protocol was amended, and primary end point was changed to investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. RESULTS: One-hundred-twenty-nine patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (n = 64) or sunitinib/pazopanib (n = 65). Median (range) follow-up, defined as time from randomization to data cutoff, was 10.3 months (2.2-14.3) and 10.3 months (2.7-13.8) in the pembrolizumab plus epacadostat and sunitinib/pazopanib arms, respectively. ORRs were similar between pembrolizumab plus epacadostat (31.3% [95% CI 20.2-44.1] and sunitinib/pazopanib (29.2% [18.6-41.8]). Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 34.4% and 42.9% of patients in the pembrolizumab plus epacadostat and sunitinib/pazopanib arms, respectively. One patient in the sunitinib/pazopanib arm died of septic shock (not treatment-related). Circulating kynurenine levels decreased in the pembrolizumab plus epacadostat arm, but not to levels observed in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: ORRs were similar between pembrolizumab plus epacadostat and sunitinib/pazopanib as first-line treatment in patients with mRCC. Safety and tolerability appeared similar between treatment arms; no new safety concerns were identified. Antitumor responses observed in patients with RCC receiving pembrolizumab plus epacadostat may be driven primarily by pembrolizumab. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03260894 .
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Indazoles , Neoplasias Renales , Pirimidinas , Sulfonamidas , Sunitinib , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Sunitinib/uso terapéutico , Sunitinib/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Anciano , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , OximasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify characteristics associated with long-term progression-free survival (≥2 years) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in the phase III PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of PRIMA, patients randomized to niraparib were grouped based on investigator-assessed progression-free survival (progressive disease/censoring <2 years or ≥2 years after randomization). Variables assessed for predictive value were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage at diagnosis, clinical response to platinum-based chemotherapy, number of prior chemotherapy cycles, primary tumor location, body mass index, categorical age, debulking surgery type, number of baseline target lesions, number of baseline non-target lesions, BRCA/homologous recombination-deficiency status, residual disease status, and duration from end of chemotherapy to randomization. Logistic regression modeling using backward elimination (significance level=0.15) identified covariates associated with long-term progression-free survival (clinical cut-off date November 17, 2021). RESULTS: Of 487 patients randomized to niraparib, 152 (31%) had progressive disease/censoring ≥2 years after randomization. Multivariable logistic regression modeling using backward elimination identified BRCA1/2 mutation/homologous recombination deficiency status (p<0.0001), FIGO stage (p=0.041), primary tumor location (p=0.095), and number of baseline non-target lesions (p=0.0001) to be associated with long-term progression-free survival. Patients significantly more likely to achieve progression-free survival of ≥2 years in the final model were those with BRCA1- and BRCA2-mutated/homologous recombination-deficient tumors or BRCA wild-type/not determined/homologous recombination-deficient tumors (vs BRCA wild-type/homologous recombination-proficient/not determined tumors), FIGO stage III (vs IV), and 0 or 1 baseline non-target lesions (vs ≥2 baseline non-target lesions). CONCLUSIONS: The hypothesis-generating results of this analysis suggest that BRCA1/2 mutation/homologous recombination-deficiency status, FIGO stage, and number of baseline non-target lesions may predict progression-free survival of ≥2 years in patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving niraparib first-line maintenance therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02655016.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Humanos , Femenino , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , AncianoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Patterns of disease recurrence on poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor maintenance therapy are unclear and may affect subsequent treatment. This ad hoc subgroup analysis of the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study evaluated patterns of initial recurrence in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). METHODS: PRIMA included participants at high risk for disease progression. This ad hoc analysis only evaluated participants randomized to niraparib maintenance without evidence of disease at baseline. The number and site(s) of initial recurrent lesions at investigator-assessed progressive disease (PD) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 314 niraparib-treated patients analyzed, 190 developed ≥1 new lesion (median number of new lesions, 1.0; interquartile range, 1-2). In total, 93.2% (177/190) of patients developed 1-3 lesions at first disease progression. The most common sites of recurrence were the peritoneum (30.0% [57/190]), lymph nodes (26.3% [50/190]), and liver (20.5% [39/190]). Similar results were observed when patients with PD were stratified by biomarker status, disease stage at diagnosis, and type of debulking surgery. Patients with homologous recombination-proficient tumors, stage III disease, or a history of primary debulking developed a median of 2.0 new lesions at first progression; patients with homologous recombination-deficient tumors, stage IV disease, or a history of interval debulking developed a median of 1.0 new lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with AOC without lesions at first-line maintenance treatment initiation develop oligometastatic disease at first recurrence. Prospective evaluation is required to determine whether these patients have improved outcomes when local therapies are combined with continuous, systemic, targeted maintenance therapy.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Femenino , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodos , Adulto , Ftalazinas/administración & dosificación , Ftalazinas/efectos adversos , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Progresión de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of niraparib in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: This was a follow-up analysis of a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in Japanese women with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer. Participants received niraparib (starting dose 300 mg) once daily in continuous 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events (defined as the overall incidence of the MedDRA Preferred Terms "thrombocytopenia" and "platelet count decreased") occurring in the 30 days after initial administration of niraparib, and secondary endpoints included evaluation of treatment-emergent adverse events and progression-free survival. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (median age, 62 years; median body weight, 53.9 kg) were enrolled. As previously reported, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events during the first 30 days of treatment was 31.6%. At data cutoff, median (range) treatment exposure was 504.0 (56-1,054) days and mean ± standard deviation dose intensity was 154.4±77.5 mg/day. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (n=14, 73.7%), decreased platelet count (n=12, 63.2%), decreased neutrophil count (n=11, 57.9%), anemia, vomiting, and decreased appetite (all n=9, 47.4%). One patient was diagnosed with treatment-related leukemia, which resulted in death. Median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival was 18.0 (5.6-26.7) months. CONCLUSION: Overall, the safety profile of niraparib was considered manageable in this study population of Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and was consistent with that observed in studies of non-Japanese patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759587.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Trombocitopenia , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Trombocitopenia/epidemiología , Japón , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Adulto , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is a common practice to reduce gastro-esophageal adverse events associated with drug treatments but may impair absorption and exposure to oncology drugs. This study investigated the effect of concomitant administration of PPIs and pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib on survival of patients with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Total 451 patients receiving pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib as first line treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were defined as "no concomitant PPIs (PPI-)" if no PPIs were administered during TKIs, and as "concomitant PPIs (PPI+)" if the administration of PPIs was at least 75% of the time during which TKIs were given. RESULTS: Eighty patients administered pazopanib were PPI- and 86 PPI+; no difference in PFS was observed (10.7 vs. 11.9 months, P = .79). If patients were stratified as short (n = 89) and long (n = 77) responders, there was a significant difference in terms of PFS in PPI+ (n = 47) versus PPI- (n = 30) in long responders, being 24.7 versus 38 months (P = .04), respectively. In the sunitinib cohort, no significant difference of PFS in PPI+ (n = 102) versus PPI- (n = 131) was found, being 11.3 versus 18.1 months, respectively (P=0.15). In the cabozantinib cohort, there was a statistically significant difference in PFS of PPI+ versus PPI- (6 months vs. not reached, P = .04). No correlation with adverse events was found. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates an association between PPIs and impaired PFS in mRCC patients given pazopanib and cabozantinib and recommends caution on their concomitant use.
Asunto(s)
Anilidas , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Indazoles , Neoplasias Renales , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Piridinas , Pirimidinas , Sulfonamidas , Sunitinib , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Sunitinib/administración & dosificación , Sunitinib/efectos adversos , Sunitinib/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Anilidas/efectos adversos , Anilidas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Interacciones FarmacológicasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To explore safety and tolerability parameters for the niraparib individualized starting dose (ISD) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to platinum-based chemotherapy who participated in the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial (NCT02655016). METHODS: The PRIMA protocol was amended so newly enrolled patients received an ISD based on baseline body weight/platelet count. In this ad hoc analysis, the timing, duration, and resolution of the first occurrence of common any-grade hematologic (thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia) and nonhematologic (nausea, asthenia/fatigue, constipation, insomnia, hypertension) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated by treatment arm in the ISD safety population (data cutoff, November 17, 2021; median follow-up, 3.5 years). RESULTS: Of 733 randomized patients, 255 were enrolled after the ISD protocol amendment and received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment (niraparib, 169; placebo, 86). In the niraparib arm, median times to first events were 22.0-35.0 days for hematologic TEAEs and 7.0-56.0 days for nonhematologic TEAEs. First events resolved in ≥ 89.8% of patients for hematologic TEAEs; for nonhematologic TEAEs, resolution rates ranged from 55.3% (insomnia) to 86.0% (nausea). Median durations of first hematologic TEAEs were ≤ 16.0 days, but for first nonhematologic TEAEs ranged from 18.0 days (nausea) to 134.0 days (insomnia). CONCLUSION: The niraparib ISD was generally well tolerated and TEAEs were manageable. Common hematologic and nonhematologic TEAEs occurred early and first events of hematologic TEAEs had a short duration (≈ 2 weeks) and a high resolution rate. These findings support close monitoring immediately following niraparib initiation and may help inform patient expectations for niraparib safety.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Humanos , Femenino , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Isoquinolinas/administración & dosificación , Isoquinolinas/efectos adversos , Isoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia de MantenciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Niraparib is a poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved for the maintenance treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (OC). Niraparib was originally approved in recurrent OC at a fixed starting dose (FSD) of 300 mg once daily (QD). This analysis characterized the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of niraparib and evaluated the relationships between exposure, efficacy, and safety to support clinical use of an individualized dosing strategy, in which the starting dose of niraparib was adjusted based on patient characteristics to improve the benefit-risk profile. METHODS: A population PK model was developed by pooling data from four niraparib clinical trials (PN001 [n = 104], QUADRA [n = 455], NOVA [n = 403], and PRIMA [n = 480]) in patients with solid tumors, including OC. Exposure-response analyses were conducted to explore the relationships of niraparib exposure with progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events in the PRIMA study. A multivariate logistic regression model was also developed to estimate the probability of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, using data from patients enrolled in PRIMA and NOVA. The impact of an individualized starting dose (ISD) regimen (200 mg QD in patients with body weight [BW] <77 kg or platelet count [PLT] <150,000/µL, or 300 mg QD in patients with BW ≥77 kg and PLT ≥150,000/µL) on systemic exposure, efficacy, and safety was assessed. FINDINGS: Niraparib disposition was best described by a 3-compartment model with linear elimination. Key covariates included baseline creatinine clearance, BW, albumin, and age, all of which had minor effects on niraparib exposure. Comparable model-predicted exposure up to the time of disease progression/death or censoring in the 300-mg FSD and 200-/300-mg ISD groups was consistent with the lower rate of dose reduction in the ISD groups. No consistent niraparib exposure-response relationship was observed for efficacy in all PRIMA patients (first-line OC), and no statistically significant difference was seen in PFS curves for patients receiving a niraparib dose of 200 mg versus 300 mg. In the multivariate regression model, performed using combined data from PRIMA and NOVA, higher niraparib exposure (area under the concentration-time curve at steady-state [AUCss]), lower BW, and lower PLT were associated with an increased risk of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. IMPLICATIONS: Population PK and exposure-response analyses support use of an ISD to improve the safety profile of niraparib, including reducing the rate of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, without compromising efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01847274 (NOVA), NCT00749502 (PN001), NCT02655016 (PRIMA), NCT02354586 (QUADRA), www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.
Asunto(s)
Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Indazoles/farmacocinética , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Ensayos Clínicos como AsuntoRESUMEN
The approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), introducing several ICI-based combinations as the new standard of care for affected patients. Nonetheless, monotherapy with antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as pazopanib or sunitinib, still represents a first-line treatment option for selected patients belonging to the favorable risk group according to the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) model. After TKI monotherapy, the main second-line option is represented by ICI monotherapy with the anti-Programmed Death Receptor 1(PD-1) nivolumab. To date, the expected clinical outcomes are similar with pazopanib or sunitinib and there is no clear indication for selecting one TKI over the other. Moreover, their impact on subsequent ICI treatment outcomes is not well defined, yet. Based on these premises, we investigated the immunomodulatory activity of these drugs in vitro and in vivo.Both TKIs induced Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and soluble PD-L1 release in RCC cells, and hampered T cell activation, reducing cytokine production and the proportion of activated T cells. Nevertheless, in a syngeneic co-culture system with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and tumor cells, incubation with anti-PD-1 antibody following TKIs treatment significantly restored T cell function, potentiating the cytotoxic effects against tumor cells. Pazopanib and sunitinib followed by anti-PD-1 antibody produced a comparable inhibition of tumor growth in a RCC syngeneic mouse model. Our findings suggest that pazopanib and sunitinib, showing similar immunomodulatory effects, may have a comparable impact on the subsequent effectiveness of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1 , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Pirimidinas , Sulfonamidas , Sunitinib , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Animales , Humanos , Ratones , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/farmacología , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Sunitinib/farmacología , Sunitinib/uso terapéutico , Línea Celular Tumoral , Pirimidinas/farmacología , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/farmacología , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/metabolismo , Indazoles/farmacología , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/farmacología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto/métodos , Nivolumab/farmacología , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Nivolumab/administración & dosificación , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismoRESUMEN
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors have been increasingly used in ovarian cancer treatment. However, the real-world safety data of these drugs in Japanese patients are limited. This retrospective study included 181 patients with ovarian cancer who received olaparib or niraparib at two independent hospitals in Japan between May 2018 and December 2022. Clinical information and blood sampling data were collected. Regarding patient backgrounds, the olaparib group had higher proportions of patients with serous carcinoma, BRCA positivity, homologous recombination deficiency, and those receiving maintenance therapy after recurrence treatment than the niraparib group. Regarding toxicity properties, the most common reasons for discontinuation in the olaparib group were anemia, fatigue, and nausea, while the reason in the niraparib was thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia caused by niraparib treatment occurred earlier than anemia caused by olaparib treatment. Patients with a low body mass index or who had undergone several previous treatment regimens were more likely to discontinue treatment within the first 3 months. Although we analyzed blood collection data, predicting treatment interruptions due to blood toxicity was challenging. In this study, we revealed the characteristics of patients and the timing of interruptions for each drug, highlighting the importance of carefully managing adverse effects.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Femenino , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Japón , Estudios Retrospectivos , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Ftalazinas/efectos adversos , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/efectos adversos , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of age on the efficacy and safety of niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with a complete/partial response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study (NCT02655016). Patients in the intent-to-treat population were categorized according to age at baseline (<65 years vs ≥65 years), and progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were evaluated for each age subgroup (clinical cutoff date, May 17, 2019). Safety findings were also evaluated according to a fixed starting dose (FSD) or an individualized starting dose (ISD). RESULTS: Of 733 randomized patients, 289 (39.4%) were ≥65 years (190 niraparib, 99 placebo) at baseline. Median PFS (niraparib vs placebo) and hazard ratios (95% CI) were similar in patients aged <65 years (13.9 vs 8.2 months; HR, 0.61 [0.47-0.81]) and ≥65 years (13.7 vs 8.1 months; HR, 0.53 [0.39-0.74]). The incidences of any-grade and grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar across age subgroups; in the niraparib arm, TEAEs leading to dose discontinuation occurred in 7.8% of patients <65 years and 18.4% of patients ≥65 years. ISD use lowered the incidence of grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia events in niraparib-treated patients compared with the FSD (<65 years: 42.8% vs 18.0%; ≥65 years 57.0% vs 26.1%). HRQOL was comparable across age subgroups. CONCLUSION: Niraparib efficacy, safety, and HRQOL were generally comparable across age subgroups, although patients ≥65 years had a higher rate of discontinuations due to TEAEs. ISD use reduced grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia events regardless of age.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Edad , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia de Mantención/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We previously reported that metastases are generally characterized by a core program of gene expression that activates tissue remodeling/vascularization, alters ion homeostasis, induces the oxidative metabolism, and silences extracellular matrix interactions. This core program distinguishes metastases from their originating primary tumors as well as from their destination host tissues. Therefore, the gene products involved are potential targets for anti-metastasis drug treatment. METHODS: Because the silencing of extracellular matrix interactions predisposes to anoiks in the absence of active survival mechanisms, we tested inhibitors against the other three components. RESULTS: Individually, the low-specificity VEGFR blocker pazopanib (in vivo combined with marimastat), the antioxidant dimethyl sulfoxide (or the substitute atovaquone, which is approved for internal administration), and the ionic modulators bumetanide and tetrathiomolybdate inhibited soft agar colony formation by breast and pancreatic cancer cell lines. The individual candidate agents have a record of use in humans (with limited efficacy when administered individually) and are available for repurposing. In combination, the effects of these drugs were additive or synergistic. In two mouse models of cancer (utilizing 4T1 cells or B16-F10 cells), the combination treatment with these medications, applied immediately (to prevent metastasis formation) or after a delay (to suppress established metastases), dramatically reduced the occurrence of disseminated foci. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of tissue remodeling inhibitors, suppressors of the oxidative metabolism, and ion homeostasis modulators has very strong promise for the treatment of metastases by multiple cancers.
Asunto(s)
Indazoles , Pirimidinas , Sulfonamidas , Animales , Humanos , Ratones , Sulfonamidas/farmacología , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Línea Celular Tumoral , Pirimidinas/farmacología , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Indazoles/farmacología , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Molibdeno/farmacología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de XenoinjertoRESUMEN
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the highly fatal types of cancer with high mortality/incidence. Considering the crucial role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in PDAC progression, its inhibition can be a viable strategy for the treatment. Pazopanib, a second-generation VEGF inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of various oncological conditions. However, due to associated limitations like low oral bioavailability (14-39%), high inter/intra-subject variability, stability issues, etc., high doses (800 mg) are required, which further lead to non-specific toxicities and also contribute toward cancer resistance. Thus, to overcome these challenges, pazopanib-loaded PEGylated nanoliposomes were developed and evaluated against pancreatic cancer cell lines. The nanoliposomes were prepared by thin-film hydration method, followed by characterization and stability studies. This QbD-enabled process design successfully led to the development of a suitable pazopanib liposomal formulation with desirable properties. The % entrapment of PZP-loaded non-PEGylated and PEGylated nanoliposomes was found to be 75.2% and 84.9%, respectively, whereas their particle size was found to be 129.7 nm and 182.0 nm, respectively. The developed liposomal formulations exhibited a prolonged release and showed desirable physicochemical properties. Furthermore, these liposomal formulations were also assessed for in vitro cell lines, such as cell cytotoxicity assay and cell uptake. These studies confirm the effectiveness of developed liposomal formulations against pancreatic cancer cell lines. The outcomes of this work provide encouraging results and a way forward to thoroughly investigate its potential for PDAC treatment.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Indazoles , Liposomas , Nanopartículas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Tamaño de la Partícula , Pirimidinas , Sulfonamidas , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/farmacología , Humanos , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/farmacología , Sulfonamidas/química , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/farmacología , Pirimidinas/química , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamiento farmacológico , Nanopartículas/química , Polietilenglicoles/química , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/química , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Liberación de Fármacos , Química Farmacéutica/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Model-based methods can predict pediatric exposure and support initial dose selection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of allometric scaling of population pharmacokinetic (popPK) versus physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models in predicting the exposure of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for pediatric patients (≥ 2 years), based on adult data. The drugs imatinib, sunitinib and pazopanib were selected as case studies due to their complex PK profiles including high inter-patient variability, active metabolites, time-varying clearances and non-linear absorption. METHODS: Pediatric concentration measurements and adult popPK models were derived from the literature. Adult PBPK models were generated in PK-Sim® using available physicochemical properties, calibrated to adult data when needed. PBPK and popPK models for the pediatric populations were translated from the models for adults and were used to simulate concentration-time profiles that were compared to the observed values. RESULTS: Ten pediatric datasets were collected from the literature. While both types of models captured the concentration-time profiles of imatinib, its active metabolite, sunitinib and pazopanib, the PBPK models underestimated sunitinib metabolite concentrations. In contrast, allometrically scaled popPK simulations accurately predicted all concentration-time profiles. Trough concentration (Ctrough) predictions from the popPK model fell within a 2-fold range for all compounds, while 3 out of 5 PBPK predictions exceeded this range for the imatinib and sunitinib metabolite concentrations. CONCLUSION: Based on the identified case studies it appears that allometric scaling of popPK models is better suited to predict exposure of TKIs in pediatric patients ≥ 2 years. This advantage may be attributed to the stable enzyme expression patterns from 2 years old onwards, which can be easily related to adult levels through allometric scaling. In some instances, both methods performed comparably. Understanding where discrepancies between the model methods arise, can further inform model development and ultimately support pediatric dose selection.
Asunto(s)
Mesilato de Imatinib , Indazoles , Modelos Biológicos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Pirimidinas , Sulfonamidas , Sunitinib , Humanos , Niño , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Sunitinib/farmacocinética , Sunitinib/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/farmacocinética , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Sulfonamidas/farmacocinética , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Mesilato de Imatinib/farmacocinética , Mesilato de Imatinib/administración & dosificación , Preescolar , Adolescente , Simulación por Computador , Masculino , Femenino , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Factores de EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Maintenance therapy with niraparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, has been shown to extend progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of biomarker status. However, there are limited data on niraparib's efficacy and safety in the neoadjuvant setting. The objective of Cohort C of the OPAL trial (OPAL-C) is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of neoadjuvant niraparib treatment compared with neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer with confirmed homologous recombination-deficient tumors. METHODS: OPAL is an ongoing global, multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial. In OPAL-C, patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive three 21-day cycles of either neoadjuvant niraparib or platinum-taxane doublet neoadjuvant chemotherapy per standard of care. Patients with a complete or partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) will then undergo interval debulking surgery; patients with stable disease may proceed to interval debulking surgery or alternative therapy at the investigator's discretion. Patients with disease progression will exit the study treatment and proceed to alternative therapy at the investigator's discretion. After interval debulking surgery, all patients will receive up to three 21-day cycles of platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by niraparib maintenance therapy for up to 36 months. Adult patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer eligible to receive neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery may be enrolled. Patients must have tumors that are homologous recombination-deficient. The primary endpoint is the pre-interval debulking surgery unconfirmed overall response rate, defined as the investigator-assessed percentage of patients with unconfirmed complete or partial response on study treatment before interval debulking surgery per RECIST v1.1. DISCUSSION: OPAL-C explores the use of niraparib in the neoadjuvant setting as an alternative to neoadjuvant platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy to improve postsurgical residual disease outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer with homologous recombination-deficient tumors. Positive findings from this approach could significantly impact preoperative ovarian cancer therapy, particularly for patients who are ineligible for primary debulking surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574779. Registered on February 28, 2022.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Indazoles , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/efectos adversos , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Recombinación Homóloga , Hidrocarburos Aromáticos con Puentes/administración & dosificación , Hidrocarburos Aromáticos con Puentes/uso terapéutico , Hidrocarburos Aromáticos con Puentes/efectos adversos , Piperazinas/efectos adversos , Piperazinas/administración & dosificación , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Niraparib is a potent and orally bioavailable inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) with high specificity for isoforms 1 and 2. It has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for ovarian cancer maintenance therapy and is currently under development for various cancers, including glioblastoma. To assess central nervous system (CNS) penetration of niraparib in glioblastoma patients, a novel bioanalytical method was developed to measure total and unbound niraparib levels in human brain tumor tissue and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The method was validated using plasma as a surrogate matrix over the concentration range of 1-10,000â¯nM on an LC-MS/MS system. The MS/MS detection was conducted in positive electrospray ionization mode, while chromatography was performed using a Kinetex™ PS C18 column with a total 3.5-minute gradient elution run time. The maximum coefficient of variation for both intra- and inter-day precision was 10.6%, with accuracy ranging from 92.8% - 118.5% across all matrices. Niraparib was stable in human brain homogenate for at least 6â¯hours at room temperature (RT) and 32 days at -20°C, as well as in stock and working solutions for at least 21â¯hours (RT) and 278 days (4°C). Equilibrium dialysis experiments revealed the fractions unbound of 0.05 and 0.16 for niraparib in human brain and plasma, respectively. The validated method is currently employed to assess niraparib levels in human glioblastoma tissue, CSF, and plasma in an ongoing trial on newly diagnosed glioblastoma and recurrent IDH1/2(+) ATRX mutant glioma patients (NCT05076513). Initial results of calculated total (Kp) and unbound (Kp,uu) tumor-to-plasma partition coefficients indicate significant brain penetration ability of niraparib in glioblastoma patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Indazoles , Piperidinas , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Humanos , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Piperidinas/sangre , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Indazoles/farmacocinética , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Indazoles/uso terapéutico , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacocinética , Cromatografía Liquida/métodos , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/metabolismo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Sulfonamidas/farmacocinética , Sulfonamidas/análisis , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Cromatografía Líquida con Espectrometría de MasasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The combination of niraparib and abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone is under investigation for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Regular-strength (RS) and lower-strength (LS) dual-action tablets (DATs), comprising niraparib 100 mg/AA 500 mg and niraparib 50 mg/AA 500 mg, respectively, were developed to reduce pill burden and improve patient experience. A bioequivalence (BE)/bioavailability (BA) study was conducted under modified fasting conditions in patients with mCRPC to support approval of the DATs. METHODS: This open-label randomized BA/BE study (NCT04577833) was conducted at 14 sites in the USA and Europe. The study had a sequential design, including a 21-day screening phase, a pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment phase comprising three periods [namely (1) single-dose with up to 1-week run-in, (2) daily dose on days 1-11, and (3) daily dose on days 12-22], an extension where both niraparib and AA as single-agent combination (SAC; reference) or AA alone was continued from day 23 until discontinuation, and a 30-day follow-up phase. Patients were randomly assigned in a parallel-group design (four-sequence randomization) to receive a single oral dose of niraparib 100 mg/AA 1000 mg as a LS-DAT or SAC in period 1, and patients continued as randomized into a two-way crossover design during periods 2 and 3 where they received niraparib 200 mg/AA 1000 mg once daily as a RS-DAT or SAC. The design was powered on the basis of crossover assessment of RS-DAT versus SAC. During repeated dosing (periods 2 and 3, and extension phase), all patients also received prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg twice daily. Plasma samples were collected for measurement of niraparib and abiraterone plasma concentrations. Statistical assessment of the RS-DAT and LS-DAT versus SAC was performed on log-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters data from periods 2 and 3 (crossover) and from period 1 (parallel), respectively. Additional paired analyses and model-based bioequivalence assessments were conducted to evaluate the similarity between the LS-DAT and SAC. RESULTS: For the RS-DAT versus SAC, the 90% confidence intervals (CI) of geometric mean ratios (GMR) for maximum concentration at a steady state (Cmax,ss) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0-24 h at a steady state (AUC 0-24h,ss) were respectively 99.18-106.12% and 97.91-104.31% for niraparib and 87.59-106.69 and 86.91-100.23% for abiraterone. For the LS-DAT vs SAC, the 90% CI of GMR for AUC0-72h of niraparib was 80.31-101.12% in primary analysis, the 90% CI of GMR for Cmax,ss and AUC 0-24h,ss of abiraterone was 85.41-118.34% and 86.51-121.64% respectively, and 96.4% of simulated LS-DAT versus SAC BE trials met the BE criteria for both niraparib and abiraterone. CONCLUSIONS: The RS-DAT met BE criteria (range 80%-125%) versus SAC based on 90% CI of GMR for Cmax,ss and AUC 0-24h,ss. The LS-DAT was considered BE to SAC on the basis of the niraparib component meeting the BE criteria in the primary analysis for AUC 0-72h; abiraterone meeting the BE criteria in additional paired analyses based on Cmax,ss and AUC 0-24h,ss; and the percentage of simulated LS-DAT versus SAC BE trials meeting the BE criteria for both. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04577833.
Asunto(s)
Acetato de Abiraterona , Indazoles , Piperidinas , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Comprimidos , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Humanos , Indazoles/farmacocinética , Indazoles/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Acetato de Abiraterona/farmacocinética , Acetato de Abiraterona/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacocinética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Modelos Biológicos , Disponibilidad Biológica , Estudios Cruzados , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Simulación por Computador , Prednisona/farmacocinética , Prednisona/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition is one of the cornerstones of treatment in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Since RCC is a disease of advanced age and hypertension as a side effect of VEGF receptor inhibitors, beta-blocker use is common in these patients. We aimed to compare the treatment efficacy and survival results in case of concomitant use of these two drugs due to the inhibition of VEGF in beta-blockers. METHODS: A total of 121 patients with a diagnosis of mRCC who used sunitinib or pazopanib in first-line therapy were included in the study. These patients were divided into two groups as those using concomitant beta-blockers and those not using them. RESULT: The median overall survival (mOS) of the patient using sunitinib or pazopanib and concomitant beta-blocker was 47 (95% CI 29.0-65.0) months, and the mOS of those not using concomitant beta-blocker was 18 (95% CI 8.9-27.1) months (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of the patients using sunitinib or pazopanib and concomitant beta-blocker was 20.4 (95% CI 4.5-40.1) months, and the mPFS of those not using it was 11.4 (95% CI 5.9-16.9) months (p = 0.042). Concomitant beta-blocker use was found to be a good prognostic factor for OS in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.029). In the multivariate analysis, concomitant beta-blocker use had a trend towards statistical significance for PFS (p = 0.062). CONCLUSION: Concomitant use of betablockers with sunitinib or pazopanib is associated with longer overall survial and progression free survival.