Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 10.600
Filtrar
1.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 119(4): 445-451, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39250614

RESUMEN

Introduction: Reconstruction surgery of the proximal aorta in most cases involves the use of an aortic conduit, followed by reimplantation of the coronary ostia. Although uncommon, the origin of the coronary arteries in certain anatomical variants poses additional difficulties when performing surgery on the aortic root and requires a different treatment rationale. Case report: We hereby present the case of a 60-year-old patient with multiple cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia), suffering from severe degenerative stenosis of a bicuspid aortic valve, associated with ascending aorta aneurysm and a significant extrinsic stenosis of the left coronary artery caused by the aneurysm. The patient presented with severe degenerative bicuspid aortic valve stenosis associated with ascending aorta aneurysm and a significant extrinsic stenosis of the left coronary artery caused by the aneurysm. Following the preoperative assessment, it was decided that the best course of action was to perform surgery on the aortic valve and ascending aorta. During the surgery, the origin of the right and left coronary ostia were found at the level of the left coronary cusp, both forming a common coronary button. Due to this particular anatomical variant, it was decided to reimplant them as a common button onto the main conduit by means of an interposed No.10 PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene) vascular prosthesis. Conclusion: A rare case of aortic root surgery associated with coronary ostia origin variant "shotgun barrel", which required a different method of reimplantation: modified Cabrol technique.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Válvula Aórtica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/anomalías , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Enfermedad de la Válvula Aórtica Bicúspide/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Válvula Aórtica Bicúspide/complicaciones , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/complicaciones , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis Coronaria/cirugía , Estenosis Coronaria/complicaciones , Estenosis Coronaria/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Reimplantación/métodos
2.
EuroIntervention ; 20(17): e1062-e1075, 2024 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39219357

RESUMEN

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a common clinical disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Investigations based largely on non-invasive imaging are pivotal in discerning the severity of disease and its impact on the heart. Advances in technology have contributed to improved risk stratification and to our understanding of the pathophysiology of AR. Surgical aortic valve replacement is the predominant treatment. However, its use is limited to patients with an acceptable surgical risk profile. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is an alternative treatment. However, this therapy remains in its infancy, and further data and experience are required. This review article on AR describes its prevalence, mechanisms, diagnosis and treatment.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica , Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/terapia , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas
3.
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars ; 52(6): 375-383, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39225646

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of tricuspid valve (TV) transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) procedures using the MitraClip or TriClip device in high-risk patients with severe secondary tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and provide Turkish-specific data on procedural outcomes and clinical follow-up. METHODS: This study enrolled 42 high-risk patients with severe secondary TR who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair using either the MitraClip or TriClip device. Patient selection criteria included severe TR, high surgical risk (EuroScore ≥ 8 and Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact Severity Score (TRI-SCORE) ≥ 6), symptomatic despite medical therapy, and anatomical suitability for TriClip. Patients underwent rigorous evaluation by a specialized cardiac team before the procedure, including 2D/3D transesophageal echocardiography to assess eligibility. RESULTS: The study achieved a 100% procedural success rate, defined as successful implantation and at least one-degree reduction in TR severity. Post-procedure assessments revealed that 88.1% of patients had mild to moderate TR, indicating significant improvement, while only 11.9% retained severe TR. During the median follow-up of 11.5 months, rehospitalization occurred in 23.8% of patients, and mortality was observed in 7.1% of patients, demonstrating a favorable safety profile. Comparative analysis between TriClip and MitraClip devices showed similar efficacy and safety outcomes, with no significant differences in procedural durations or complication rates. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of TV TEER using TriClip or MitraClip devices in managing severe secondary TR in high-risk patients. Procedure success, improved TR severity, and favorable clinical outcomes were observed, supporting the role of transcatheter techniques in TR management.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide , Humanos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Turquía , Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Válvula Tricúspide/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39282975

RESUMEN

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, leading to progressive dilation of cardiac chambers, abnormal contraction patterns of the atria and ventricles and, potentially, atrioventricular valvular insufficiency. Moreover, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction is often present and closely intertwined with disease initiation and progression. Surgical valve repair with a true-sized ring annuloplasty is a well-established treatment option in atrial functional mitral regurgitation. While early results are good, recent studies have brought the durability of this repair approach into question, highlighting the need for further refinement of the surgical strategy. In particular, repair strategies that simultaneously target the mitral valve as well as the left ventricle could provide improved repair durability.


Asunto(s)
Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Humanos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral/métodos , Atrios Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Atrios Cardíacos/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos
5.
Physiol Rep ; 12(17): e70028, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39227321

RESUMEN

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are options in severe aortic valve stenosis (AVS). Cardiovascular (CV) and cerebrovascular (CBV) control markers, derived from variability of heart period, systolic arterial pressure, mean cerebral blood velocity and mean arterial pressure, were acquired in 19 AVS patients (age: 76.8 ± 3.1 yrs, eight males) scheduled for SAVR and in 19 AVS patients (age: 79.9 + 6.5 yrs, 11 males) scheduled for TAVI before (PRE) and after intervention (POST, <7 days). Left ventricular function was preserved in both groups. Patients were studied at supine resting (REST) and during active standing (STAND). We found that: (i) both SAVR and TAVI groups featured a weak pre-procedure CV control; (ii) TAVI ensured better CV control; (iii) cerebral autoregulation was working in PRE in both SAVR and TAVI groups; (iv) SAVR and TAVI had no impact on the CBV control; (v) regardless of group, CV and CBV control markers were not influenced by STAND in POST. Even though the post-procedure preservation of both CV and CBV controls in TAVI group might lead to privilege this procedure in patients at higher risk, the missing response to STAND suggests that this advantage could be insignificant.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Circulación Cerebrovascular , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Proyectos Piloto , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Circulación Cerebrovascular/fisiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos
6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39258415

RESUMEN

This is a 15-year-old, 73.5 kg male who was born with congenital aortic valve stenosis. He underwent a transcatheter balloon aortic valvuloplasty in the neonatal period, followed by an open aortic valvotomy at 2 months of age. When he was 3 years old, he underwent aortic root replacement with a 15 mm aortic homograft. Recently, he presented with recurrent left ventricular outflow tract obstruction that appeared valvular and subvalvular in nature. We present our technique of repeat aortic root replacement and left ventricular outflow tract enlargement using modified Bentall combined with Konno-Rastan aortoventriculoplasty.


Asunto(s)
Esternotomía , Obstrucción del Flujo Ventricular Externo , Humanos , Obstrucción del Flujo Ventricular Externo/cirugía , Masculino , Esternotomía/métodos , Adolescente , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Recurrencia , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Obstrucción del Flujo de Salida Ventricular Izquierda
7.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39258523

RESUMEN

In treating aortic root diseases, the Bentall procedure offers reliable and stable results. However, it requires a prosthetic valved conduit, which presents inherent challenges due to the need for anticoagulation. The Ozaki procedure, which uses pericardium for aortic valve neocuspidization, is an alternative to prosthetic valves and does not need anticoagulation. We developed a surgical technique combining the Bentall and Ozaki procedures to treat patients with aortic root disease, which we describe in this article. Because the risk of bleeding due to anticoagulation after prosthetic valve replacement was a concern, we combined the Bentall and Ozaki procedures with a graft conduit using bovine pericardial patch neocuspidization. Postoperative echocardiography showed a competent aortic valve with no regurgitation. We believe that this novel procedure provides hope for a more adaptable and patient-friendly option.


Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Bovinos , Pericardio/trasplante , Masculino , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Bioprótesis/efectos adversos , Femenino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Animales , Persona de Mediana Edad
9.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(36): e39491, 2024 Sep 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39252282

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fast-track cardiac anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol in valve replacement surgery. The clinical data of 88 patients with rheumatic heart disease undergoing valve replacement surgery were retrospectively analyzed and grouped based on different treatment methods. Among them, 44 cases received fast-track cardiac anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of fentanyl and propofol from November 2019 to July 2021 were set as the control group, and 44 cases received fast-track cardiac anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol from August 2021 to February 2022 were set as the study group. The study group showed shorter postoperative awakening time, extubation time, and hospital stay duration, and lower dosage of dopamine and nitroglycerin consumption compared to the control group (P < .05). At T5 and T6, both groups exhibited higher ACTH, cortisol (Cor), and C3a than at T0, and the study group showed significantly lower ACTH, Cor, and C3a at T5 and T6 than the control group (P < .05). At T7, the control group showed higher ACTH, Cor, and C3a than at T0, and ACTH, Cor, and C3a were significantly lower in the study group than in the control group at T7 (P < .05). Fast-track cardiac anesthesia using target-controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol in valve replacement surgery has demonstrated favorable application effects, which stabilizes hemodynamics, alleviates myocardial damage, suppresses endocrine stress responses, and does not increase adverse reactions, thereby exhibiting good safety.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Intravenosos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Propofol , Sufentanilo , Humanos , Sufentanilo/administración & dosificación , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Adulto , Cardiopatía Reumática/cirugía , Anestesia en Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia
10.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 66(3)2024 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39141430

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Degenerative mitral regurgitation is associated with heart failure, arrhythmia and mortality. The impact of sex on timing of surgical referral and outcomes has not been reported comprehensively. We examined preoperative status and surgical outcomes of male versus female degenerative mitral valve regurgitation patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: We reviewed our institutional database for all patients undergoing surgery for degenerative mitral regurgitation between 2013 and 2021. Preoperative clinical and echocardiographic variables, surgical characteristics and outcomes were compared, and left atrial strain in available images. RESULTS: Of 963 patients, 314 (32.6%) were female. Women were older (67 vs 64 years, P = 0.031) and more often had bileaflet prolapse (19.4% vs 13.8%, P = 0.028), mitral annular calcification (12.1% vs 5.4%, P < 0.001) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR; 31.8% vs 22.5%, P = 0.001). Indexed left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters were higher in women, with 29.4 vs 26.7 mm/m2 (P < 0.001) and 18.2 vs 17 mm/m2 (P < 0.001), respectively, and left atrial conduit strain lower (17.6% vs, 21.2%, P = 0.001). Predicted risk of mortality was 0.73% vs 0.54% in men (P = 0.023). Women required mechanical circulatory support more frequently (1.3% vs 0%, P = 0.011), had longer intensive care unit stay (29 vs 26 h, P < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (5.4 vs 5 h, P = 0.036), and overall hospitalization (7 vs 6 days, P < 0.001). There was no difference in long-term reoperation-free survival (P = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing mitral valve repair are older and show indicators of more advanced disease with long-standing left ventricular impairment. Guidelines may need to be adjusted and address this disparity, to improve postoperative recovery times and outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Humanos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores Sexuales , Ecocardiografía , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología
11.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 66(2)2024 Aug 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39178014

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Mechanical composite valve grafts (MCVGs) are the first-line therapy for aortic root replacement in young adults. Decellularized aortic homografts (DAH) present a promising novel alternative due to their lower thrombogenicity. We aimed to compare both treatment options regarding survival and valve-related adverse events. METHODS: This study was designed as a single-centre retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent root replacement with MCVG or DAH between 2000 and 2022. Urgent or emergent procedures were excluded. RESULTS: The study cohort included 289 patients (MCVG n = 216, DAH n = 73) with a mean age of 48.5 ± 12 years (MCVG 49 ± 12 years vs DAH 47 ± 11 years; P = 0.23) and a median EuroScore II of 1.7% (1.2, 2.6). The 30-day mortality was 1% (n = 3). Cumulative survival at 3 years was 99% for DAH and 94% for MCVG, respectively (P = 0.15). Mean follow-up was 98.9 ± 72.7 months. Bleeding events (n = 14, 6.5%) and thromboembolism (n = 14, 6.5%) were only observed in the MCVG group (P = 0.19 and 0.09, respectively). Four cases (5%) of moderate structural valve deterioration occurred, all in the DAH group (P ≤ 0.001). The cumulative incidence of a composite end point of valve-related adverse events was significantly higher in the MCVG group (P = 0.0295). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic root replacement with MCVGs and decellularized aortic homografts showed low mortality in an elective setting. Patients in the homograft cohort demonstrated significantly higher freedom from valve-related adverse events. DAH present a promising treatment option for young patients requiring root replacement; however, data on long-term durability are needed.


Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Adulto , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Aorta/cirugía , Aloinjertos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Bioprótesis/efectos adversos , Diseño de Prótesis
12.
Med ; 5(8): 859-862, 2024 Aug 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39127035

RESUMEN

Heart valve disease patients undergo multiple surgeries to replace structurally degraded valve prostheses, highlighting the need for valve replacements with growth and self-repair capacity. Given allogeneic valve transplantation's promise in meeting these goals by delivering a living valve replacement, we propose a framework for preserving and rehabilitating living valves ex vivo.


Asunto(s)
Cardiopatías Congénitas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Humanos , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Cardiopatías Congénitas/rehabilitación , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/rehabilitación , Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos
13.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 66(2)2024 Aug 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39120113

RESUMEN

Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction is a rare complication following transcatheter mitral valve implantation. Diagnosing the underlying cause is mandatory to select from different treatment options. We report a case of stent-graft implantation into the left ventricular outflow tract for dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction caused by systolic anterior motion of the anterior mitral valve leaflet (SAM).


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Válvula Mitral , Stents , Obstrucción del Flujo Ventricular Externo , Humanos , Obstrucción del Flujo Ventricular Externo/cirugía , Obstrucción del Flujo Ventricular Externo/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Stents/efectos adversos , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Obstrucción del Flujo de Salida Ventricular Izquierda
14.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(16): e034112, 2024 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39136306

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Right-sided heart failure (HF) due to severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with reduced quality of life (QoL). Here, we analyzed the impact of TR on specific QoL dimensions and the effect of transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) on individual QoL items. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we included 174 patients with HF (49% women; median age, 79 years; 97% New York Heart Association ≥3) with baseline QoL assessment undergoing TTVI by transcatheter edge-to-edge-repair at our center between April 2016 and March 2022. QoL was assessed by the standardized Minnesota Living With HF Questionnaire. QoL change after TTVI and correlation to functional end points were analyzed. In addition, all QoL domains and the 21 individual items of the Minnesota Living With HF Questionnaire were analyzed. TTVI significantly reduced TR (TR ≥3: baseline 95%, 1-year-follow-up 7%; P<0.001). Total Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire score improved from 37 (interquartile range, 26-50) points to 31 (interquartile range, 17-42) points (median follow-up-interval, 355 days; P<0.001). QoL improvement was associated with positive New York Heart Association class, 6-minute walking distance, and actigraphy changes (all P<0.05). The detailed analysis revealed that all items of the physical-related QoL dimension were impaired at baseline and strongly improved after TTVI. In contrast, the emotional and "social" Minnesota Living With HF Questionnaire dimensions were largely unaffected at baseline, yet specific items improved with TTVI. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center study, we delineate the QoL-associated disease burden of TR and identify specific QoL items that improved after TTVI. Our findings support TTVI in patients with reduced QoL and may add to the development of specific tools assessing the functional status of an increasing patient population undergoing TTVI.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Calidad de Vida , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Tricúspide/fisiopatología , Anciano , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/psicología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Válvula Tricúspide/fisiopatología , Válvula Tricúspide/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Costo de Enfermedad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
16.
Int J Cardiol ; 415: 132448, 2024 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39153510

RESUMEN

Bioprosthetic mitral valve degeneration is traditionally treated with Redo-SMVR, but the latest ViV-TMVR procedure offers a less invasive and lower risk alternative. A systematic literature search was conducted on Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Medline (PubMed interface) electronic databases from inception till 15th April 2024. We used risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. We included a total of eleven studies with 11,931 patients in the final quantitative and qualitative analysis. When comparing ViV-TMVR with Redo-SMVR, no significant difference was found for 30-day mortality (P = 0.13) and 1-year mortality (P = 0.91), whereas patients in the ViV-TMVR showed significantly reduced incidence of stroke (P < 0.00001), In-hospital mortality (P), bleeding complications (P = 0.003), AKI (P = 0.0006), arrhythmias (P = 0.01), LVOT obstruction (P = 0.04), and PPI (P < 0.00001). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between either group when comparing vascular complications (P = 0.97), 2-year mortality (P = 0.60) and 3-year mortality. ViV-TMVR was associated with a significant risk of paravalvular leakage (P = 0.008). Although, ViV-TMVR reduces the risk of complications associated with Redo-SMVR, larger studies are imperative to reach conclusive results.


Asunto(s)
Bioprótesis , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Válvula Mitral , Falla de Prótesis , Reoperación , Humanos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
17.
Am J Cardiol ; 229: 36-46, 2024 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39147304

RESUMEN

Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) is now frequently performed in patients with adult congenital heart disease. As the life expectancy of the population with adult congenital heart disease continues to improve, more patients will require pulmonary valve intervention. This study details the short-term and midterm clinical outcomes of patients aged ≥40 years who underwent TPVR. We performed an institutional retrospective cohort study that included patients aged ≥40 years who underwent TPVR (and clinical follow-up) from January 1, 2012 to January 1, 2024. Descriptive analyses, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to determine outcomes and risk factors affecting survival. The study included 67 patients, and median age at TPVR was 48 years (43 to 57). Median hospital length of stay after TPVR was 1 day (1 to 3); periprocedural complications occurred in 5 patients, and acute kidney injury occurred in 1 patient. Median duration of follow-up was 3.5 years (0.1 to 9.7). There were 9 total deaths, and 1-, 3-, and 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival after TPVR was 95%, 91%, and 82%, respectively. Moderate or worse right ventricular dysfunction was present in 22 patients before TPVR and in 20 patients after TPVR. Inpatient status before TPVR negatively affected survival (hazard ratio 24.7, 3.3 to 186.1, p = 0.002). In conclusion, TPVR was performed in patients aged ≥40 years with favorable periprocedural and midterm follow-up outcomes including survival, but right ventricular dysfunction did not improve, and further exploration of the ideal timing of TPVR in this age group is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Válvula Pulmonar , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Adulto , Válvula Pulmonar/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Pulmonar/cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Estudios de Seguimiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
18.
Am J Cardiol ; 228: 56-69, 2024 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39089524

RESUMEN

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) continues to grow in the United States. There are limited data on recipients of solid organ transplant (SOT) and patients with liver cirrhosis who undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR). Our study aims to evaluate outcomes in these populations. Using the national readmission database (2016 to 2020), we identified recipients of SOT and patients with liver cirrhosis without previous liver transplants who were admitted for severe aortic stenosis and underwent either TAVR or surgical AVR (SAVR). We used multivariable regression for adjusted analysis and the propensity score matching model, implementing complete Mahalanobis distance matching within the Propensity Score Caliper (0.2) to match TAVR and SAVR cohorts for outcomes. Of 3,394 hospitalizations for AVR in recipients of SOT, 2,181 underwent TAVR, and 1,213 underwent SAVR. On propensity-matched analysis, SAVR was associated with more adverse events than was TAVR, including in-hospital mortality (5.2% vs 1.1%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.49, p <0.001), acute kidney injury (43.7% vs 10.2%, p <0.001), cardiogenic shock (9.0% vs 1.6%, p <0.001), sudden cardiac arrest (15.9 vs 6.0%, p <0.001), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (28% vs 10.4%, p <0.001), and net adverse events (72.8 vs 37.6%, p <0.001). A greater median length of stay (10 vs 2 days, p <0.001) and adjusted cost ($80,842 vs $57,014, p <0.001) were also observed. The readmission rates were the same for both cohorts after a 6-month follow-up. Similarly, in 14,763 hospitalizations for AVR in liver cirrhosis, 7,109 patients underwent TAVR, and 7,654 underwent SAVR. In propensity-matched cohorts (n = 2,341), SAVR was found to be associated with greater adverse events, including in-hospital mortality (19.8% vs 10%), stroke (6.7% vs 2%), acute kidney injury (67.7% vs 30.3%), cardiogenic shock (41.9% vs 19.9%), sudden cardiac arrest (31.8% vs 13.2%, aOR 2.89), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (66.2% vs 35.7%), and net adverse events (86% vs 59.5%) (p <0.001). A greater median length of stay (16 vs 3 days) and cost ($500,218 vs $263,383) were also observed (p <0.001). However, the rate of readmissions at 30-day (9% vs 11.1%) and 180-day intervals (33.4% vs 39.8%) was lower for the SAVR cohort (p <0.05). In recipients of SOT and patients with liver cirrhosis, SAVR is associated with greater short-term mortality, adverse events, and healthcare burden than is TAVR. TAVR is a relatively safer alternative to SAVR in these patient populations, although further studies are warranted to compare the long-term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Cirrosis Hepática , Readmisión del Paciente , Puntaje de Propensión , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Anciano , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Trasplante de Órganos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos
19.
BMJ Open ; 14(8): e090050, 2024 Aug 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39153781

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Avoiding patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) in patients with small aortic annulus (SAA) during aortic valve replacement (AVR) is still a challenging surgical problem. Among surgical options available, aortic root enlargement (ARE) and stentless valve implantation (SVI) are the two most commonly used strategies. This systematic review will be conducted searching for superiority evidence based on comparative studies between these two options. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review will include all relevant articles published from 1 January 1946 to 31 March 2024, with available full texts from Medline (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases, without any language restriction. Observational studies and randomised controlled trials comparing surgical results of ARE versus SVI for AVR in patients with small aortic root will be screened. Studies will be classified into three groups: group 1 for studies that reported SVI or other tissue valve outcomes without comparing them with ARE outcomes; group 2 for studies that reported ARE outcomes without comparing them with SVI outcomes; and group 3 for studies that compared ARE outcomes with SVI outcomes. The quality of the evidence of each study will be evaluated according to Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required because no primary data are collected. The findings will be presented at scientific conferences and/or reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO, CRD42023383793.


Asunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Humanos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Proyectos de Investigación , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Diseño de Prótesis
20.
Heart Fail Clin ; 20(4): 437-444, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39216928

RESUMEN

Transcatheter mitral valve repair should be considered for patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation with symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction for symptom improvement and survival benefit. Patients with a higher severity of secondary mitral regurgitation relative to the degree of left ventricular dilation are more likely to benefit from transcatheter mitral valve repair. A multidisciplinary Heart Team should participate in patient selection for transcatheter mitral valve therapy.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Válvula Mitral , Volumen Sistólico , Humanos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Selección de Paciente
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA