RESUMEN
Social Identity Theory proposes that a positive in-group social identification fosters students' academic motivation and psychological well-being. The present study, grounded in Social Identity Theory, investigated the roles of racial/ethnicity identity (REI) in the development of school adjustment among Black and Latinx youth as well as the psychological mechanisms underlying these longitudinal associations. We hypothesized that REI would positively predict the development of academic achievement and emotional symptoms. In addition, we hypothesized that the development of school belonging would mediate the predictive effects of REI on the growth of academic achievement and emotional symptoms. Participants were 475 (n = 182 Black, 48.9% female; 293 Latinx, 47.8% female) students in Grades 7-9. Students self-reported their REI, school belonging, and emotional symptoms. Academic achievement was assessed using standardized achievement test scores. The longitudinal mediation models indicated that REI indirectly predicted the development of academic achievement and emotional symptoms through students' sense of school belonging. Specifically, higher REI embedded achievement and lower REI awareness of racism predicted higher school belonging in Grade 7. Higher Grade 7 school belonging in turn predicted faster academic growth in Grade 7 to Grade 9 as well as lower emotional symptoms in Grade 7. In addition, the three dimensions of REI also directly predicted the growth of academic achievement and emotional symptoms in Grades 7-9. The mediated effects were smaller in size than the direct effects. These findings highlight the importance of fostering positive REI and a strong sense of school belonging in promoting school adjustment among racial/ethnic minoritized, academically at-risk youth.
Asunto(s)
Éxito Académico , Negro o Afroamericano , Hispánicos o Latinos , Instituciones Académicas , Identificación Social , Estudiantes , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Adolescente , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Estudiantes/psicología , Estudios Longitudinales , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Racismo/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immigrant Latinas (who are foreign-born but now reside in the USA) are at greater risk for developing postpartum depression than the general perinatal population, but many face barriers to treatment. To address these barriers, we adapted the Mothers and Babies Course-an evidence-based intervention for postpartum depression prevention-to a virtual group format. Additional adaptations are inclusion of tailored supplemental child health content and nutrition benefit assistance. We are partnering with Early Learning Centers (ELC) across the state of Maryland to deliver and test the adapted intervention. METHODS: The design is a Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation Trial. A total of 300 participants will be individually randomized to immediate (N = 150) versus delayed (N = 150) receipt of the intervention, Mothers and Babies Virtual Group (MB-VG). The intervention will be delivered by trained Early Learning Center staff. The primary outcomes are depressive symptoms (measured via the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale), parenting self-efficacy (measured via the Parental Cognition and Conduct Towards the Infant Scale (PACOTIS) Parenting Self-Efficacy subscale), and parenting responsiveness (measured via the Maternal Infant Responsiveness Instrument) at 1-week, 3-month, and 6-month post-intervention. Depressive episodes (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V- Disorders Research Version) at 3-month and 6-month post-intervention will also be assessed. Secondary outcomes include social support, mood management, anxiety symptoms, perceived stress, food insecurity, and mental health stigma at 1-week, 3-month, and 6-month post-intervention. Exploratory child outcomes are dysregulation and school readiness at 6-month post-intervention. Intervention fidelity, feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness will also be assessed guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. DISCUSSION: This study will be one of the first to test the efficacy of a group-based virtual perinatal depression intervention with Latina immigrants, for whom stark disparities exist in access to health services. The hybrid effectiveness-implementation design will allow rigorous examination of barriers and facilitators to delivery of the intervention package (including supplemental components) which will provide important information on factors influencing intervention effectiveness and the scalability of intervention components in Early Learning Centers and other child-serving settings. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05873569.
Asunto(s)
Depresión Posparto , Hispánicos o Latinos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Depresión Posparto/etnología , Depresión Posparto/terapia , Depresión Posparto/psicología , Depresión Posparto/prevención & control , Depresión Posparto/diagnóstico , Embarazo , Responsabilidad Parental/psicología , Responsabilidad Parental/etnología , Relaciones Madre-Hijo , Madres/psicología , Lactante , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Maryland , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/psicología , Autoeficacia , Recién NacidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective pharmaceutical intervention that prevents HIV infection, but PrEP uptake across the US has been slow among men who have sex with men (MSM), especially among Black/African American (B/AA) and Hispanic /Latino (H/L) MSM. This study investigates the acceptability and essential components of a peer-driven intervention (PDI) for promoting PrEP uptake among MSM, with a specific focus on B/AA and H/L communities. METHODS: We conducted 28 semi-structured, qualitative interviews with MSM in southern New England to explore the components of a PDI, including attitudes, content, and effective communication methods. A purposive sampling strategy was used to recruit diverse participants who reflect the communities with the highest burden of HIV infection. RESULTS: Of 28 study participants, the median age was 28 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 25, 35). The sample comprised B/AA (39%, n = 11) and H/L (50%, n = 14) individuals. Notably, nearly half of the participants (46%) were current PrEP users. We found that many participants were in favor of using a PDI approach for promoting PrEP. Additionally, several participants showed interest in becoming peer educators themselves. They emphasized the need for strong communication skills to effectively teach others about PrEP. Moreover, participants noted that peer education should cover key topics like how PrEP works, how effective it is, and any possible side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that effective PDIs, facilitated by well-trained peers knowledgeable about PrEP, could enhance PrEP uptake among MSM, addressing health disparities and potentially reducing HIV transmission in B/AA and H/L communities.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Homosexualidad Masculina , Grupo Paritario , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Masculino , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/estadística & datos numéricos , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/métodos , Homosexualidad Masculina/psicología , Homosexualidad Masculina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , New England , Entrevistas como Asunto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) impact about 10% of patients with pediatric cancer. Genetic testing (CPS-GT) has multiple benefits, but few studies have described parent and child knowledge and attitudes regarding CPS-GT decision-making. This study examined parent and patient CPS-GT decision-making knowledge and attitudes. PROCEDURE: English- or Spanish-speaking parents of children with pediatric cancer and patients with pediatric cancer ages 15-18 within 12 months of diagnosis or relapse were eligible to participate. Seventy-five parents and 19 parent-patient dyads (N = 94 parents, 77.7% female, 43.6% Latino/a/Hispanic; 19 patients, 31.6% female) completed surveys measuring CPS-GT-related beliefs. Independent samples t-tests compared parent responses across sociodemographic characteristics and parent-patient responses within dyads. RESULTS: Spanish-speaking parents were significantly more likely than English-speaking parents to believe that CPS-GT not being helpful (p < .001) and possibly causing personal distress (p = .002) were important considerations for deciding whether to obtain CPS-GT. Parents with less than four-year university education, income less than $75,000, or Medicaid (vs. private insurance) were significantly more likely to endorse that CPS-GT not being helpful was an important consideration for deciding whether to obtain CPS-GT (p < .001). Parents felt more strongly than patients that they understood what CPS-GT was (p = .01) and that parents should decide whether patients under 18 should receive CPS-GT (p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Spanish-speaking parents and parents with lower socioeconomic statuses were more strongly influenced by the potential disadvantages of CPS-GT in CPS-GT decision-making. Parents felt more strongly than patients that parents should make CPS-GT decisions. Future studies should investigate mechanisms behind these differences and how to best support CPS-GT knowledge and decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Padres , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Adolescente , Padres/psicología , Adulto , Niño , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Toma de Decisiones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sociodemográficos , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
Importance: Determining the influence of race and ethnicity on change in cognitive test performance has significant implications for clinical practice and research in populations at risk for Alzheimer disease. Objective: To evaluate the significance of race and ethnicity in predicting longitudinal cognitive test performance and to develop models to support evidence-based practice. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study included baseline and 24-month follow-up data that were obtained from the Health and Aging Brain Study-Health Disparities (HABS-HD) study, an ongoing longitudinal observational study of aging and dementia in a multiracial, multiethnic cohort. Participants included community-dwelling adults and elders living in the Dallas and Fort Worth metropolitan area who were Hispanic and non-Hispanic adults older than the age of 50 years and were cognitively unimpaired. Exposure: The primary exposure of interest was time, measured in months. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic variables included age, sex, education, and race and ethnicity. Cognitive domains included attention and working memory, processing speed, language, memory, and executive functioning. Linear regression models predicted follow-up performance from baseline performance and demographic variables for 13 commonly used neuropsychological tests. Follow-up testing was the primary outcome for all domains. Raw scores from 13 standardized tests were used for analyses. Results: This study included 799 adults who were cognitively unimpaired (352 Hispanic individuals [44.1%]; 447 non-Hispanic individuals [55.9%]; 524 female [65.6%]; mean [SD] age, 65.4 [8.1] years). In the regression models, all 13 follow-up scores were significantly predicted from their respective baseline scores and demographic variables. Baseline performance and education were the most consistent predictors of follow-up scores, contributing to all 13 models. Age was significantly associated with follow-up in 11 models, and sex was significant in 5 models. Race and ethnicity contributed to 10 of 13 models, with Hispanic participants predicted to have poorer follow-up scores than their non-Hispanic White counterparts on each test. Conclusions and Relevance: In this longitudinal study of cognitive change in Hispanic and non-Hispanic older adults who were cognitively unimpaired, standardized regression-based models were influenced by multiple demographic variables, including race and ethnicity. These findings highlight the importance of including race and ethnicity in such cognitive change models. This ability to accurately predict cognitive change is expected to become increasingly important as clinical practice and clinical trials need to become more diverse and culturally appropriate in this burgeoning global medical and societal crisis.
Asunto(s)
Cognición , Hispánicos o Latinos , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Longitudinales , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Disfunción Cognitiva/etnología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Envejecimiento/psicología , Envejecimiento/etnologíaRESUMEN
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective tool to prevent HIV, yet it is underutilized among women. The current study aims to evaluate the awareness, attitudes, and perceptions of PrEP among a large survey sample of Black and Latina women in New York City (NYC). Interviewer-administered surveys were conducted in high HIV incidence neighborhoods in NYC among Black, Latina, and Afro-Latina women who reported recent sex with a man in 2017 (n = 398) and 2018 (n = 405). About 40% of participants were aware of PrEP, whereas 30.4% indicated interest in using it. The top reason for not utilizing it was low HIV risk perception. However, most participants supported the idea that using PrEP meant asserting control over their health (94.1%). Primary care providers and obstetricians/gynecologists were participants' preferred sources for PrEP (91.6%). Across survey cycles, compared to non-Black Latina participants, Black participants had significantly higher PrEP awareness (44.4% vs. 29.1%). PrEP awareness was also significantly higher among survey participants in 2018 (45.2%) than in 2017 (34.3%). Less than half of the participants were aware of PrEP, but those who were aware expressed largely positive attitudes toward the medication. Our findings may inform future PrEP implementation strategies to optimize awareness and access to PrEP among women disproportionately affected by HIV, like focusing on personal empowerment instead of risk-based messaging and training women's sexual health care providers in PrEP provision.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Infecciones por VIH , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificación , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/etnología , Infecciones por VIH/psicología , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/etnología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Sexual/etnologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the past 2 decades, melanoma incidence among Hispanic individuals has risen by 20%. The mortality rate of Hispanic individuals is higher than that for non-Hispanic White individuals. Skin cancer can largely be prevented with regular sun protection, and skin cancer outcomes can be improved through early detection, for example, by skin self-examination. Alarmingly, Hispanic individuals are less aware of the symptoms and harms of skin cancers, tend to have misperceptions regarding the risks and benefits of skin cancer prevention behaviors, and engage in less sun protection behaviors than non-Hispanic White individuals. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to use a community-engaged approach and conduct both group and individual interviews among Hispanic individuals and relevant key stakeholders to explore the potential design of a mobile-based skin cancer prevention intervention for Hispanic individuals. METHODS: This study used a qualitative design (focus groups and individual interviews). Participants were recruited from local community organizations' social media, local events, and contact lists (eg, email). Zoom interviews were conducted to examine whether Hispanic individuals would be interested in a mobile-based skin cancer intervention and to explore their preferences and suggestions to inform skin cancer prevention intervention design. RESULTS: Five focus groups (2 in Spanish and 3 in English) among self-identified Hispanic individuals (n=34) and 15 semistructured, in-depth individual interviews among key stakeholders (health care providers and community leaders; eg, dermatologist, nurse practitioner, licensed social worker, and church leader) were conducted. The main themes and subthemes emerging from the group discussions and individual interviews were organized into the following categories: intervention platform, delivery frequency and format, message design, engagement plan, and activities. WhatsApp and Facebook were identified as suitable platforms for the intervention. Messages including short videos, visuals (eg, images and photographs), and simple texts messages were preferred. Recommendations for message design included personalized messages, personal stories and narratives, culturally relevant design (eg, incorporating family values), and community-trusted sources. Potential engagement and retention recommendations were also discussed. Additional details and exemplar quotes of each theme and subtheme are described. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important insights and directions for the design of a mobile, digital skin cancer intervention to modify Hispanic individuals' sun protection and skin self-examination behaviors to help improve skin cancer outcomes. Insights gathered from community leaders and health care providers provided valuable additions to the community-derived data. Leveraging popular digital platforms among Hispanic individuals such as WhatsApp or Facebook could be a promising approach to skin cancer prevention. Recommendations from the community included the use of concise videos, illustrative images, clear text messages, tailored communications, narratives featuring personal experiences, designs that reflect cultural significance, and information from sources that are trusted by the community, which provided useful strategies for future intervention design among Hispanic individuals.
Asunto(s)
Grupos Focales , Hispánicos o Latinos , Investigación Cualitativa , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Femenino , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etnología , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Exercise interventions often improve moderate to vigorous physical activity, but simultaneously increase sedentary time due to a compensatory resting response. A higher level of sedentary time is associated with a lower level of executive function, while increased moderate to vigorous physical activity is associated with improved global cognition and working memory among Latino adults. Latino adults are the fastest-growing minority group in the United States and are at high risk for cognitive decline, spend more time sedentary compared to non-Hispanic populations, and engage in low levels of physical activity. Interventions that are culturally appropriate for Latino adults to replace sedentary time with physical activity are critically needed. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop and test the feasibility and acceptability of an ecological momentary intervention (EMI; delivered in real time) that is individually designed to replace sedentary time with physical activity in Latino adults. METHODS: This pilot study randomized 39 (n=26, 67% female; mean age 61, SD 5.8 years) community-dwelling, Spanish-speaking Latino adults (1:1 allocation) to either a 6-week EMI program designed to replace sitting time with physical activity (20/39, 51%) or physical activity guidelines education (19/39, 49%). The program was conducted on the web and in Spanish. The intervention was individualized based on individual interview responses. The intervention included the use of a Fitbit activity monitor, weekly didactic phone meetings, interactive tools (SMS text messages), and coach-delivered feedback. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed via study satisfaction (Likert scales), motivation (ecological momentary assessment), retention, and compliance. Sedentary time and physical activity were assessed via 7-day actigraphy. Cognitive performance was assessed via the trail making test part A and B (part B=executive function) and via the National Institutes of Health Toolbox remote cognitive assessment. Statistical analysis included a linear model on change score from baseline, adjusting for age, sex, and education, emphasizing effect size. RESULTS: Participant satisfaction with EMI was high (9.4/10), with a high degree of motivation to replace sitting time with physical activity (9.8/10). The intervention compliance rate was 79% with low difficulty using the Fitbit (1.7/10). Weekly step count increased in the intervention group by 5543 steps (group difference: d=0.54; P=.05) and sedentary time decreased by a mean 348 (SD 485) minutes (group difference: d=0.47; P=.24) compared to controls, with moderately strong effect sizes. The trail making test part B improved in the intervention group (mean -35.26, SD 60.35 seconds), compared to the control group (mean 7.19, SD 46 seconds; group difference: d=0.74; P=.01). No group differences were observed in other cognitive measures. CONCLUSIONS: An individualized EMI designed for midlife and older Latino adults has the potential to replace sitting time with physical activity and improve executive functioning. The intervention was feasible and well received with a high degree of satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04507464; https://tinyurl.com/44c4thk5.
Asunto(s)
Función Ejecutiva , Ejercicio Físico , Hispánicos o Latinos , Conducta Sedentaria , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , AncianoRESUMEN
The recent COVID-19 global emergency may have ripple effects on mental health of many people worldwide. This is especially true for populations like birthing and postpartum women where many changes to daily routines, access to medical care, work-related routines and socialization were experienced. This brief report presents data from an ongoing cohort study aiming to describe maternal mental health during the pandemic T12 (March 2020 to April 2021) with post-pandemic T2 (May 2022 to May 2023) of mothers followed in Puerto Rico. 47 out of 100 mothers have been recalled and assessed with psychosocial interviews (COPE-IUS) and assessments of anxiety (GAD-7) and depression (PHQ-9). Paired t-test revealed mean scores of depressions (PHQ-9) were significantly higher for T2 with a mean of 6.35 and a range of 4.4+/- than for T1 where mean was 5.15 (+/- 2.9), t=-1.954, df=45, p < .05. Similarly, anxiety scores (GAD-7) were significantly higher in T2 6.67 (4.2) than for T1 5.35 (3.7), t=-1.8, df=45, p < .05. Also, COPE-IUS Post-pandemic psychosocial interview results evidence that 80% of mothers do not feel the COVID-19 pandemic is a significant stressor at T2 and are able to maintain routine activities with no social distancing measures. However, reports of loneliness, sadness, worry, and fear continue to be present. Our findings point to the need to further identify other contributing factors to the deterioration of maternal mental health during the perinatal/peripartum period (pregnancy, birth, and postpartum) in Puerto Rico. Possibly the effects of repeated adversity that has been present in the island (multiple environmental stressors, history of traumatic experiences, and constant hardships) may all have cumulative impact over maternal mental health during the perinatal/peripartum period.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , COVID-19 , Hispánicos o Latinos , Salud Mental , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Puerto Rico , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Madres/psicología , Adulto Joven , Depresión/epidemiología , Embarazo , Salud Materna , Depresión Posparto/epidemiología , Depresión Posparto/psicología , Periodo Posparto/psicologíaRESUMEN
Childhood eating behaviors are associated with weight status and laboratory assessments of dietary intake. However, little is known about how eating behaviors relate to the eating patterns and diet quality of children from marginalized populations when assessed in their natural environments. Therefore, we examined the association of food avoidant (e.g., food fussiness and satiety responsiveness) and food approach (e.g., food responsiveness and enjoyment of food) eating behaviors with children's meal size, eating frequency, and diet quality. We analyzed data from 61 predominately low-income Hispanic/Latinx preschool-aged children. Caregivers completed the Childhood Eating Behavior Questionnaire and two 24-h dietary recalls. From the recalls, we calculated meal size, eating frequency, and modified Diet Quality Index Scores (DQIS), and evaluated associations with eating behaviors using multivariable linear models. We also explored the relationship between eating behaviors and DQIS components. Food-avoidant subscales were associated with smaller meals and satiety responsiveness were associated with decreased snack frequency. Food approach subscales were not associated with meal size or eating frequency. Both food-avoidant and food-approach behaviors were associated with components of diet quality and caloric beverages outside of meal and snacks. These findings can inform future research on the relationship between child eating behaviors and dietary intake so that we can develop more tailored and effective interventions to promote healthy eating habits for low-income, Hispanic/Latinx preschool-aged children.
Asunto(s)
Conducta Infantil , Dieta , Conducta Alimentaria , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Preescolar , Femenino , Masculino , Conducta Alimentaria/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Conducta Infantil/psicología , Dieta/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Comidas/psicología , Bocadillos , Pobreza/psicología , Dieta Saludable/psicología , Irritabilidad AlimentariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SA) are risk factors for suicide which peak during adolescence; however, evidence focused on differences in SI and SA risk among racial/ethnic minority youth is limited despite increasing suicide rates among several racial/ethnic minority groups. METHODS: We analyzed a representative sample of adolescents aged 12-17 with prior depressive symptoms (n = 32,617) from the cross-sectional National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (2008-2019). Survey-weighted adjusted logistic regressions estimated the association of race/ethnicity with self-reported lifetime SI and SA, controlling for sociodemographics, lifetime substance use, lifetime major depressive episode, and self-rated health. RESULTS: Compared to white adolescents, Black and Hispanic adolescents had a 2.5 % (p = 0.04) and 4.2 % (p < 0.001) lower likelihood of reporting SI. However, among participants reporting SI, Black and Hispanic adolescents had a 3.2 % (p = 0.03) and 3.1 % (p = 0.03) higher likelihood of reporting SA than white adolescents. Multiracial adolescents were 5.9 % (p = 0.03) more likely to report SA than white adolescents. LIMITATIONS: Although racial/ethnic minority groups are less likely to self-report mental health symptoms, we could only assess SI/SA among adolescents self-reporting prior depressive symptoms, and we could only assess SA among adolescents self-reporting SI due to survey methods. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in the racial/ethnic distribution of suicidality supports theories conceptualizing separate pathways for SI and SA. This underscores the need for greater attention to racial/ethnic differences in suicide-related research, surveillance, and prevention efforts, including ensuring that mental health risk assessments directly evaluate SA in addition to SI in order to better identify high-risk racial/ethnic minority youth.
Asunto(s)
Ideación Suicida , Intento de Suicidio , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Intento de Suicidio/etnología , Intento de Suicidio/psicología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Blanco/psicología , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this exploratory study was to investigate perceptions of people who stutter and beliefs about the causes and cures of stuttering within the Hispanic/Latino community. METHODS: Respondents who were 18 or older and of Hispanic/Latino origin were invited to respond to a 24-question online survey. Questions involved exploring familiarity with and beliefs regarding etiologies, treatment approaches, treatment providers, stereotypes, and perceptions of people who stutter. Data from 151 respondents were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Results revealed that the most commonly held beliefs regarding the causes of stuttering were being "born with it", an "emotional disturbance or trauma", a "brain disorder", and/ or a "sensory impairment". The most frequently cited beliefs regarding treating stuttering were "therapy", "rehabilitation", and "tell them to slow down". Over 75 % of respondents believed that "speech therapists" can cure or treat stuttering. Respondents' perceptions of people who stutter are that they are generally "nervous" and "shy". CONCLUSIONS: Common beliefs and perceptions relative to stuttering were identified in the Hispanic/Latino community. The beliefs one holds about the cause of stuttering as well as their negative perceptions of stutterers may contribute to the continued stigmatization of people who stutter. Implications are discussed regarding the need for culturally appropriate education for individuals who stutter, their families, and the general public.
Asunto(s)
Hispánicos o Latinos , Tartamudeo , Humanos , Tartamudeo/psicología , Tartamudeo/terapia , Tartamudeo/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud/etnología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Importance: Hispanic adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are more likely to develop complications and die from the disease than the US general population. Digital storytelling interventions are narrative-based videos elicited through a community-based participatory research approach to surface the authentic voices of participants overcoming obstacles to health-promoting behaviors that perpetuate health inequities; research on the effect of digital storytelling on T2D outcomes among Hispanic adults is lacking. Objective: To assess the impact of a digital storytelling intervention on glycemic control and its acceptability among Hispanic patients with poorly controlled T2D. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial conducted within 2 primary care networks in Minnesota and Arizona among Hispanic adults with poorly controlled T2D (hemoglobin A1c level ≥8%). Enrollment and follow-up were conducted between February 14, 2019, and November 1, 2023. Intervention: The intervention group viewed a 12-minute digital storytelling video. The video included 4 Spanish-language stories that reinforced 4 diabetes self-management behavioral goals (healthful diet for diabetes, physical activity, medication adherence, and glucose self-monitoring). The control group received printed, culturally tailored T2D education materials. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline to 3 months for hemoglobin A1c levels, adjusting for baseline hemoglobin A1c, age, gender, education, and income. Acceptability and narrative quality of the intervention were assessed through questionnaires. Results: There were 451 study participants, with 227 (mean [SD] age, 54.3 [9.3] years; 158 [69.3%] women) randomized to the intervention group and 224 (mean [SD] age, 54.5 [9.1] years; 156 [69.3%] women) to the control group. Of these, 390 completed 3-month follow-up of the primary outcome (86% retention). There was a small improvement in the mean (SD) hemoglobin A1c level in the intervention group compared with the control group in the adjusted model (9.1% [1.7] to 8.4% [1.6] vs 9.4% [1.8] to 8.8% [2.0]; P = .04] but not in the unadjusted model. Acceptability and narrative quality of the intervention were high. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, a digital storytelling intervention developed with and for Hispanic adults with T2D was highly acceptable and feasibly implemented within primary care settings and resulted in a modest improvement of glycemic control. This was a highly scalable intervention that may be integrated into clinical practice as part of a longitudinal diabetes self-management program for Hispanic adults. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03766438.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hemoglobina Glucada , Hispánicos o Latinos , Narración , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnología , Femenino , Masculino , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Minnesota , Adulto , Anciano , Arizona , Automanejo/métodos , Automanejo/educaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Dealing with cancer evokes not only physical and emotional distress, but may also promote resilience through spirituality. Patients with cancer are vulnerable to neuroendocrine dysregulation. This longitudinal observational study examined the degree to which spirituality was associated with neuroendocrine biomarkers and the moderating role of Hispanic ethnicity. METHODS: Participants were adults who were recently diagnosed with colorectal cancer (n = 81, 55 years old, 66% male, 63% Hispanic, 72% advanced cancer, 7 months post-diagnosis). The domains of spirituality (faith, meaning, and peace) and ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic) were self-reported. Cortisol and alpha amylase (sAA) were assayed from saliva samples collected at waking and bedtime on seven consecutive days. Mean levels at waking and bedtime, and diurnal slopes over seven days were calculated. Age and cancer stage were covariates. RESULTS: Overall, patients reported moderate to high levels of spirituality. General linear modeling revealed that greater faith was associated with higher levels of sAA at waking and bedtime as well as more blunted diurnal pattern of sAA only among Hispanic patients (p ≤ .045). Greater peace was associated with steeper diurnal pattern of sAA, regardless of ethnicity (B = 0.021, p = .005). Meaning and cortisol were not significantly associated with study variables. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that presence of peace facing a cancer diagnosis associated with neuroendocrine regulation, whereas drawing on one's faith, particularly among Hispanic patients, associated with neuroendocrine dysregulation during the first months after the diagnosis. Further investigations of psychobiobehavioral moderators and mediators for healthy neuroendocrine functioning among patients with cancer are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Hispánicos o Latinos , Hidrocortisona , Saliva , Espiritualidad , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etnología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/psicología , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Hidrocortisona/metabolismo , Hidrocortisona/análisis , Saliva/química , Estudios Longitudinales , Anciano , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , alfa-Amilasas/metabolismo , alfa-Amilasas/análisisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: DiversiPrEP is a culturally-tailored PrEP program for LMSM offered in South Florida. DiversiPrEP navigates LMSM through their PrEP journey, including education, deciding if PrEP is relevant for them, payment, and accessing/maintaining PrEP use. DiversiPrEP includes five ERIC strategies (Increase Demand, Promote Adaptability, Alter Client Fees, Intervene with Clients to Enhance Uptake and Adherence, and Tailor Strategies). DESCRIPTION: Photovoice was used to conduct five two-part focus groups with LMSM (n = 12) and Non-LMSM (n = 12). In the first session, trainers provided guidance on selecting and contextualizing photos to generate CFIR themes. Then, participants captured photos that embodied their lived experiences accessing PrEP. In the second session, using SHOWeD, participants discussed photos, identifiedhow photos relate to culturally relevant issues. Triangulation approaches compared/contrasted themes between LMSM and Non-LMSM. RESULTS: Five central themes emerged around barriers and facilitators to PrEP services: 1) the need for normalizing PrEP messages within the MSM community, 2) the need for normalizing PrEP messages outside the MSM community, 3) the need for expanding PrEP knowledge, 4) different motivations for using PrEP, and 5) the presence of structural barriers that limit PrEP access. This study compared similarities and differences of barriers and facilitators to PrEP use between Latino/a and non-Latino/a MSM. Similarities included the built environment (outer setting) as a barrier, the need for normalizing PrEP messaging within and outside of the MSM community, and the need to expand PrEP knowledge. Differences between Latino/a and non-Latino/a MSM were found in assessing the motivation and personal drivers (inner setting) for initiating PrEP associated with how participants viewed their responsibilities to self or others. CONCLUSIONS: Photovoice with focus groups identified CFIR constructs that can guide the large-scale implementation of a client-centered PrEP service model with telehealth for both Latino/a and non-Latino/a MSM. Implementing client-centered accessible PrEP programs is an essential step to promoting sexual-health equity.
Asunto(s)
Grupos Focales , Infecciones por VIH , Hispánicos o Latinos , Homosexualidad Masculina , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Humanos , Masculino , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición/métodos , Florida , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Adulto , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Homosexualidad Masculina/psicología , Ciencia de la Implementación , Fotograbar , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Older Latino adults with HIV are at increased risk for mild cognitive impairment and earlier onset of aging-related cognitive decline. Improvements in cognitive functioning and cognitive outcomes are possible among people with HIV who adopt health promotion behaviors. However, health promotion interventions for older Latino adults with HIV have not been extensively used or widely recognized as viable treatment options. Happy Older Latinos are Active (HOLA) is a multicomponent, health promotion intervention that is uniquely tailored for older Latino adults with HIV. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to (1) determine the feasibility and acceptability of an adapted version of HOLA aimed at improving cognitive functioning among older Latino adults with HIV; (2) explore whether HOLA will produce changes in cognitive functioning; (3) explore whether HOLA will produce changes in activity, psychosocial functioning, or biomarkers of cognition; and (4) explore whether changes in activity, psychosocial functioning or cognitive biomarkers correlate with changes in cognition, while accounting for genetic risk for dementia. METHODS: A single-arm pilot trial with 30 Latino (aged 50 years and older) men and women with HIV was conducted to assess feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects on cognition. Participants were assessed at 2 time points (baseline and postintervention) on measures of neurocognitive and psychosocial functioning. In addition, blood samples were collected to determine biomarkers of cognition at baseline and postintervention. Successful recruitment was defined as meeting 100% of the targeted sample (N=30), with 20% (n=6) or less of eligible participants refusing to participate. Adequate retention was defined as 85% (n=25) or more of participants completing the postintervention assessment and acceptability was defined as 80% (n=38) or more of sessions attended by participants. RESULTS: Participant recruitment began on February 22, 2022, and was completed on August 15, 2022. The last study visit took place on February 20, 2023. Data analysis is currently ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: Encouraging findings from this exploratory study may provide a blueprint for scaling up the HOLA intervention to a larger cohort of older Latino adults with HIV who may be currently experiencing or are at risk for HIV-related cognitive challenges. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04791709; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04791709. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/55507.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Infecciones por VIH , Promoción de la Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Proyectos Piloto , Masculino , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/psicología , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/etnología , Disfunción Cognitiva/etnología , Disfunción Cognitiva/prevención & control , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Asistencia Sanitaria Culturalmente CompetenteRESUMEN
Justice-involved young adult (JIYA) men are at high risk for HIV, yet frequently do not access HIV services. A better understanding of testing behaviors and motivation, as well as facilitators and barriers to testing is necessary for treatment-as-prevention approaches to be implemented among JIYA. Seventeen JIYA men and nine staff were recruited from three alternative sentencing programs (ASPs). In-depth interviews and a staff focus group explored HIV risk and testing uptake behaviors. Narratives from JIYA demonstrated a lack of connection among HIV risk and behavior, views on testing, and knowledge of PreP. Youth and staff also disclosed various youth and environmental/structural barriers to HIV testing. The justice system may be a crucial point of intervention to reduce HIV risk and promote HIV testing with interventions targeted to the needs of JIYA.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Infecciones por VIH , Prueba de VIH , Hispánicos o Latinos , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Infecciones por VIH/etnología , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Adulto Joven , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud/etnología , Asunción de Riesgos , Grupos Focales , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/etnología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicologíaRESUMEN
Research has established relationships between social determinants of health (SDOH) and mental health, with mixed findings on which ethnoracial groups are most vulnerable to deleterious outcomes. The current study examines ethnoracial differences in SDOH and their associations with acute mental health symptoms among patients hospitalized after emergency care. Using data collected in a multi-site study of 1,318 diverse adults admitted to inpatient units, we performed analyses using linear regression models. Findings show that Multiracial/Indigenous and Black adults had significantly higher discrimination and financial stress scores. However, compared with White adults, the positive association between extreme discrimination and acute mental health symptoms was diminished among Latinx (B=-2.3; p=.02) and Black individuals (B=-1.6; p=.05) as was the positive association between financial insecurity and acute mental health symptoms for Black adults (B=-2.3; p=.04). This study provides evidence of differential experiences of SDOH and mental health challenges that may warrant tailored interventions.
Asunto(s)
Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Humanos , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud/etnología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/etnología , Estrés Financiero/etnología , Estrés Financiero/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca/psicología , Salud Mental/etnología , Adulto Joven , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Etnicidad/psicología , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Situational factors can increase people's vulnerability to intergroup bias, including prejudicial attitudes, negative stereotyping, and discrimination. We proposed that increases in inflammatory activity that coincide with acute illness may represent a hitherto unstudied situational factor that increases intergroup bias. The current study experimentally manipulated increases in inflammatory activity by administering the seasonal influenza vaccine or a saline placebo. We quantified inflammatory activity by assessing change in salivary pro-inflammatory cytokines and assessed intergroup bias using a resume evaluation task and self-reported ethnocentrism. Primary analyses focused on a subsample of 117 participants who provided high quality data; robustness analyses included various permutations of lower quality participants. Findings revealed that changes in the cytokine interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) in response to the vaccine were associated with greater intergroup bias. Among participants who received the vaccine, IL-1ß change was negatively associated with evaluation of a Latina (but not a White woman) applicant's competency and recommended starting salary. Moreover, IL-1ß change was positively associated with ethnocentrism. Overall, results provide support for the hypothesis that acute illness, via the mechanistic role of inflammatory cytokines, affects social cognition in ways that can increase intergroup bias.
Asunto(s)
Citocinas , Hispánicos o Latinos , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Interleucina-1beta , Humanos , Femenino , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Masculino , Adulto , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Citocinas/metabolismo , Interleucina-1beta/metabolismo , Adulto Joven , Saliva/inmunología , Saliva/química , Solicitud de Empleo , PrejuicioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is a complication of epilepsy responsible for approximately 1 death per 1000 patients. The literature has demonstrated minimal SUDEP disclosure between providers and patients, although patients have consistently reported desire to know about their risk. However, the majority of these studies has been conducted in Caucasian populations which did not seek to include lower socio-economic class individuals. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine patient and provider attitudes regarding SUDEP disclosure at a community health center serving minority, predominantly Hispanic, patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized surveys distributed to patients with epilepsy (n = 20), patients with diabetes (n = 20), those with no chronic disease (n = 20) and providers (n = 13). Online surveys were distributed to 13 providers whereas phone surveys were conducted for patients with epilepsy. In-person surveys were distributed to patients with diabetes and no chronic disease to serve as comparison groups. Surveys were available in both Spanish and English. Patient surveys consisted of demographic information and questions evaluating their current knowledge and preferences regarding disclosure of a potentially fatal disorder. RESULTS: Twenty patients with epilepsy, 20 patients with diabetes, 20 patients without chronic diseases, and 9 providers responded to the online or in-person surveys. Of the patients with epilepsy, 90 % (n = 18/20) were Hispanic which was not significantly different from the comparison groups. 45 % (n = 9/20) believed they had a higher rate of death due to epilepsy with only 3 patients having heard of SUDEP prior to the survey, and only 1 learning this from a physician. All patients wanted to know everything there was to know regarding their condition, including a higher risk of unexpected death. Most patients (85%, n = 17/20) believe everyone with epilepsy should be informed of SUDEP and this information should come from their provider (90 %, n = 18/20). Results were similar for both comparison groups, except patients with diabetes unanimously desired to know about a theoretical risk of death at the time of diagnosis. Of the providers, 66.7% (n = 6/9) never discuss SUDEP, with the remaining 33.3% (n = 3/9) discussing SUDEP rarely. The primary reason for not discussing SUDEP was not knowing enough about it (66.7%, n = 5/9). CONCLUSION: Almost all patients with epilepsy had no knowledge of SUDEP, yet desired to know this information within the first two visits. Providers in the primary care setting rarely discuss SUDEP, most often due to lack of knowledge. These results are very similar to those found in mainly white, higher socioeconomic populations and indicate that race should not be a barrier to SUDEP disclosure.