RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiation therapy following by limb-sparing or conservative surgery is a standard approach for limb and trunk STS. Data supporting hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules are scarce albeit biological sensitivity of STS to radiation would justify it. We sought to evaluate the impact of moderate hypofractionation on pathologic response and its influence on oncologic outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From October 2018 to January 2023, 18 patients with limb or trunk STS underwent preoperative radiotherapy at a median dose of 52.5 Gy (range 49.5-60 Gy) in 15 fractions of 3.5 Gy (3.3-4 Gy) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A favorable pathologic response (fPR) was considered as ≥ 90% tumor necrosis on specimen examination. RESULTS: All patients completed planned preoperative radiotherapy. Eleven patients (61.1%) achieved a fPR, and 7 patients (36.8%) a complete pathologic response with total disappearance of tumor cells. Nine patients (47%) developed grade 1-2 acute skin toxicity, and 7 patients (38.8%) had wound complications on follow-up. With a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-40), no cases of local relapse were observed, and actuarial 3-year overall survival (OS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) are 87% and 76.4%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the presence of a favorable pathologic response (fPR) was associated with improved 3-year OS (100% vs. 56.03%, p = 0.058) and 3-year DMFS (86.91% vs. 31.46%, p = 0.002). Moreover, both complete or partial RECIST response and radiological stabilization of the tumor lesion showed a significant association with higher rates of 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (83% vs. 83% vs. 56%, p < 0.001) and 3-year overall survival (OS) (100% vs. 80% vs. 0, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative moderate hypofractionated radiation treatment for STS is feasible and well tolerated and associates encouraging rates of pathologic response that could have a favorable impact on final outcomes.

Asunto(s)

Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Extremidades/patología , Sarcoma/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/radioterapia , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos

RESUMEN

The extreme demand on health systems due to the COVID-19 pandemic has led to reconsider hypofractionation. Although the best clinical efficacy of these schemes is being demonstrated, the biological bases have not been established. Thus, after validating basic clinical parameters, through complementary in vitro models, we characterized the cellular and molecular mechanisms of hypofractionation protocols. Cell cultures of human lung cancer cell line A549 were irradiated with 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 Gy. The clastogenic, cytotoxic, proliferative and clonogenic capacities and bystander effect were evaluated. In addition, we assessed survival and toxicity in a retrospective study of 49 patients with lung cancer. Our findings showed that the greater efficacy of ablative regimens should not only be attributed to events of direct cell death induced by genotoxic damage, but also to a lower cell repopulation and the indirect action of clastogenic factors secreted. These treatments were optimal in terms of 1- and 2-year overall survival (74 and 65%, respectively), and progression-free survival at 1 and 2 years (71 and 61%, respectively). The greater efficacy of high doses per fraction could be attributed to a multifactorial mechanism that goes beyond the 4Rs of conventional radiotherapy.

Asunto(s)

COVID-19 , Neoplasias Pulmonares , COVID-19/radioterapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Pandemias , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Estudios Retrospectivos

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the toxicity associated with a short course dose-escalated hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) using image guided RT with or without androgen suppression therapy in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This single-center prospective observational study included 132 patients with prostate cancer from 2016 to 2020. Patients received HFRT using image guided RT (84%) with 3-dimensional (91%) or intensity modulated RT (9%). Total prescribed doses were 66 Gy (63%), 63 Gy (12%), and 60 Gy (24%) in 22, 21, or 20 daily fractions depending on organ-at-risk dose constraints. Acute toxicity was scored using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria and the international prostate symptom index. The expanded prostate cancer index composite questionnaire was used to collect quality of life data (ranging from 0-100). RESULTS: The study population consisted of 111 patients who completed RT during a period of 3 years. The risk groups were as follows: low risk (12%), intermediate (32%), and high (56%). None of the patients had suspicious lymph nodes. Ninety percent received androgen suppression therapy. Maximum acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity peaked at grade 3 in 4 of 111 evaluated patients (4%) and at grade 2 in 7 of 111 evaluated patients (8%), respectively. The average international prostate symptom score increased from 4.8 at pretreatment to 14.0 during week 4 and normalized (5.7) 3 months after treatment completion. CONCLUSIONS: The current HFRT dose-escalation trial has demonstrated the feasibility of administering 66 Gy in 22 fractions with low acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities. Further follow-up will report late toxicities and outcomes.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Brasil , Atención a la Salud , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Calidad de Vida , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Despite several advances in planning and delivery of radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer, the role of elective pelvic nodal irradiation (EPNI) remains controversial for high-risk disease. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with moderate hypofractionated RT (MHF-RT) with EPNI using modern RT techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible studies were identified on MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and proceedings of annual meetings through October 2021. We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) and MOOSE (Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. A metaregression analysis was performed to assess a possible correlation between selected variables and outcomes. A P value <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Eighteen studies with a total of 1745 patients (median follow-up, 61 months) treated with EPNI using MHF-RT were included. The biochemical relapse-free survival at 5, 7, and 10 years was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88%-94%), 83% (95% CI, 78%-91%), and 78% (95% CI, 68%-88%). The 5-year prostate cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, distant metastases-free survival, and overall survival were 98% (95% CI, 97%-99%), 88.7% (95% CI, 85%-93%), 91.2% (95% CI, 88%-92%), and 93% (95% CI, 90%-96%), respectively. The rates of local, pelvic, and distant recurrence were 0.38% (95% CI, 0%-2%), 0.13% (95% CI, 0%-1.5%), and 7.35% (95% CI, 2%-12%), respectively. The rate of late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxic effects were 6.7% (95% CI, 4%-9%) and 11.3% (95% CI, 7.6%-15%), with heterogeneity, but with rare cases of grade 3 to 5 toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: EPNI with concomitant MHF-RT provides satisfactory biochemical relapse-free survival in long-term follow-up, with low rates of genitourinary and gastrointestinal severe toxic effects and minimal pelvic and local failure.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Próstata , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Pelvis , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia

RESUMEN

CONTEXTE: Le présent document ainsi que les constats qu'il énonce ont été rédigés par l'INESSS en concertation avec le Comité de l'évolution des pratiques en oncologie (CEPO) dans une volonté d'évaluer les plus récentes données publiées en lien avec les pratiques de la radiothérapie pour le traitement du cancer du sein de stade précoce. L'objectif est de réaliser une recension des données publiées et de mobiliser les savoirs clés afin d'informer les décideurs publics et les professionnels de la santé et des services sociaux. Depuis quelques années, le traitement standard du cancer du sein de stade précoce repose sur la chirurgie conservatrice suivie d'une radiothérapie hypofractionnée en 15 ou 16 fractions (40 - 42,5 Gy) et d'un traitement systémique au besoin. L'administration d'un traitement à fractionnement réduit (15 - 16 fractions) a permis de diminuer le nombre de visites en milieu de soins, l'utilisation des équipements d'irradiation et des ressources humaines par patient, ainsi que les coûts associés au traitement d'irradiation, sans que l'efficacité clinique et l'innocuité ne soient compromises comparativement au fractionnement de 50 Gy en 25 fractions. Une réduction supplémentaire du fractionnement (ultra-hypofractionnement en 5 fractions) pourrait accroitre ces bénéfices si l'efficacité clinique et l'innocuité ne sont pas compromises. PRÉSENTATION DE LA DEMANDE: Au Canada, le cancer du sein est la néoplasie la plus fréquente et la deuxième plus importante cause de décès par cancer chez la femme. Il représente 25 % de tous les

Asunto(s)

Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Radioterapia Adyuvante/instrumentación , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Evaluación en Salud , Análisis Costo-Beneficio

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Daily, moderate hypofractionation has become standard treatment for breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery, although substantial variation exists in its use. This paper describes the generation of consensus-based recommendations for the utilisation of this therapy at the healthcare system level and compares these to American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consensus-based guidelines were developed in three steps, including a systematic literature review and involvement of radiation oncologists specialising in breast cancer in Catalonia: (a) creation of a working group and evidence review; (b) consideration of the levels of evidence and agreement on the formulation of survey questions; and (c) performance of survey and development of consensus-based recommendations. Results were compared to the ASTRO recommendations. RESULTS: Consensus was above 80% for 10 of the 14 survey items. Experts supported hypofractionated radiotherapy for all breast cancer patients aged 40 years or more; with invasive carcinoma and breast-conserving surgery; without radiation of lymph nodes; and regardless of the tumour size, histological grade, molecular subtype, breast size, laterality, other treatment characteristics, or need for a boost. Over half favoured its use in all situations, even where available scientific evidence is insufficient. The resulting recommendations and the quality of the evidence are comparable to those from ASTRO, despite some differences in the degree of consensus. CONCLUSION: Specialists agree that hypofractionation is the standard treatment for breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery, but some specific areas require a higher level of evidence before unequivocally extending indications.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma , Oncología por Radiación , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To present the first results of intraoperative irradiation (IORT) in breast cancer with a low-energy photon system used as partial breast irradiation (PBI) or as an anticipated boost before whole breast hypo-fractionated irradiation (IORT + WBI), concerning tolerance, side effects, quality of life, and patient-reported outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients treated with an Intrabeam® system of 50 kV X-rays received a 20 Gy dose intraoperatively were included. Moderate daily hypofractionation of 2.7 Gy in 15 fractions up to 40.5 Gy was administered if high-risk factors were present. Acute post-operative toxicity, surgery complications, chronic toxicity, patient-reported cosmesis and Breast-Q questionnaire were performed at follow-up visits. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were treated as PBI and the remaining 49 as IORT + WBI. Only the IORT + WBI group presented acute toxicity, mainly mild acute dermatitis (11 patients) and one subacute mastitis. A total of 20 patients presented fibrosis (18 patients grade I, 2 patients grade II), 15 (30.5%) patients in the IORT + WBI group and 3 (9.6%) patients in the group of PBI. The cosmesis evaluation in 73 patients resulted poor, fair, good or excellent in 2, 7, 38 and 26 patients, respectively. In PBI group Breast-Q scored higher, especially in terms of their psychosocial well-being (78 vs 65) and satisfaction with radiation-induced toxicity (77 vs 72, respectively) compared to IORT + WBI group. CONCLUSION: IORT is a well-tolerated procedure with low toxicity, good cosmesis and favorable patient-reported outcomes mainly when administered as PBI.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Mama , Traumatismos por Radiación , Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/etiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Calidad de Vida , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective: To analyze the incidence, dose of occurrence, grade, severity, and associated risk factors for the development of radiodermatitis, by area of the irradiated breast, in women with breast cancer, during hypofractionated radiotherapy. Method: Observational, prospective, and longitudinal study, according to the guidelines of the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology, carried out between May 2019 and May 2021. Results: A total of 104 women participated in the study, and 73.1% (95%CI: 64-82) developed signs of radiodermatitis during treatment. The majority (63.5%, 95%CI: 54-73) developed erythema in the axillary region with about 36.5 Grays. Women with large breasts and statin users are more likely to develop radiodermatitis. However, women with Phototype III skin color classification (light brown skin) are less likely to develop radiodermatitis, with skin color being a protective factor. Conclusion: The incidence of radiodermatitis in women with breast cancer during hypofractionated radiotherapy is significant. Therefore, the development of protocols for the management of this radiotoxicity is suggested, considering the cumulative dose and associated risk factors.

---

RESUMEN Objectivo: Analizar la incidencia, dosis de ocurrencia, grado, severidad y factores de riesgo asociados para el desarrollo de radiodermatitis, por área de la mama irradiada, en mujeres con cáncer de mama, durante radioterapia hipofraccionada. Método: Estudio observacional, prospectivo y longitudinal, según las directrices del Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology, realizado entre mayo de 2019 y mayo de 2021. Resultados: Participaron del estudio 104 mujeres, el 73,1% (IC 95%: 64-82) desarrollaron signos de radiodermatitis durante el tratamiento. La mayoría (63,5%, IC95%: 54-73) desarrolló eritema en la región axilar con alrededor de 36,5 Grays. Las mujeres con senos grandes y usuarias de estatinas tienen más probabilidades de desarrollar radiodermatitis. Sin embargo, las mujeres con color de piel clasificado como Fototipo III (piel morena clara) tienen menos probabilidades de desarrollar radiodermatitis, siendo el color de piel un factor protector. Conclusión: La incidencia de radiodermatitis en mujeres con cáncer de mama durante la radioterapia hipofraccionada es significativa. Por lo tanto, se sugiere el desarrollo de protocolos para el manejo de esta radiotoxicidad, considerando la dosis acumulada y los factores de riesgo asociados.

---

RESUMO Objetivo: Analisar a incidência, a dose de ocorrência, o grau, a severidade e os fatores de risco associados para o desenvolvimento de radiodermatite, por área da mama irradiada, em mulheres com câncer de mama, durante a radioterapia hipofracionada. Método: Estudo observacional, prospectivo e longitudinal, conforme diretrizes do Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology, realizado entre maio de 2019 e maio de 2021. Resultados: Participaram do estudo 104 mulheres, 73,1% (IC95%: 64-82) desenvolveram sinais de radiodermatite durante o tratamento. A maioria (63,5%, IC95%: 54-73) desenvolveu eritema na região axilar com cerca de 36,5 Grays. Mulheres com mamas volumosas e usuárias de estatinas possuem maior chance de desenvolver radiodermatite. Entretanto, mulheres com a cor da pele classificada como Fototipo III (pele morena clara) possuem menor chance de desenvolver radiodermatite, sendo a cor da pele um fator protetor. Conclusão A incidência de radiodermatite em mulheres com câncer de mama durante a radioterapia hipofracionada é expressiva. Sugere-se, portanto, o desenvolvimento de protocolos para o manejo desta radiotoxicidade, considerando a dose cumulativa e fatores de risco associados.

Asunto(s)

Enfermería Oncológica , Radiodermatitis , Radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate different hypofractionated radiotherapy (HRT) regimens for newly diagnosed elderly glioblastoma (GBM) patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review with network meta-analysis (NMA), including searches on CENTRAL, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, clinical trial databases and manual search. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. Primary outcomes: overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AE). Secondary outcomes: progression-free-survival (PFS) and quality of life (QoL). We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) table for assessing individual studies and CINeMA for evaluating the certainty of the final body of evidence. RESULTS: Four RCTs (499 patients) were included. For OS, the estimates from NMA did not provide strong evidence of a difference between the HRTs: 40 Gray (Gy) versus 45 Gy (HR: 0.89; CI 95%: 0.42, 1.91); 34 Gy versus 45 Gy (HR: 0.85; CI 95% 0.43, 1.70); 25 Gy versus 45 Gy (HR: 0.81; CI 95% 0.32, 2.02); 34 Gy versus 40 Gy (HR: 0.95; CI 95% 0.57, 1.61); and 25 Gy versus 34 Gy (HR: 0.95; CI 95% 0.46, 1.97). We performed qualitative synthesis for AE and QoL due to data scarcity and clinical heterogeneity among studies. The four studies reported a similar QoL (assessed by different methods) between arms. One RCT reported grade ≥ 3 AE, with no evidence of a difference between arms. PFS was reported in one study (25 Gy versus 40 Gy), with no evidence of a difference between arms. CONCLUSION: This review found no evidence of a difference between the evaluated HRTs for efficacy and safety.

Asunto(s)

Glioblastoma/epidemiología , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación/normas , Medición de Riesgo , Anciano , Glioblastoma/patología , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Próstata , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (hWBI) and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) could be associated in breast cancer patients showing high-risk factors of local recurrence after breast conserving therapy (BSC). The aim of this trial was to evaluate, for the first time, the toxicity and cosmesis of hWBI after photon-IORT in high-risk patients treated by adjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one high-risk localized breast cancer patients treated by BCS, IORT (20 Gy), and adjuvant chemotherapy were included from February 2019 to August 2020 in this prospective trial, of hWBI (40.5 Gy/2.67 Gy/15 fractions). Acute and late toxicity (CTCAEv5.0) and cosmesis (Harvard scale), were assessed after treatment. RESULTS: All patients completed their treatment and were evaluable after treatment. No patients showed severe (G3) acute/late toxicity. Excellent/good cosmesis at least 6 months after completing the treatment, was present in 93.6% of the patients. CONCLUSION: hWBI in high-risk localized breast cancer patients treated by chemotherapy seems to have similar toxicity and cosmetic results than conventionally fractionated WBI in combination to photon-IORT after BCS.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Mastectomía Segmentaria/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Several prospective randomized trials have shown that hypofractionation has the same efficacy and safety as the conventional fractionation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. There are many benefits of hypofractionation, including a more convenient schedule for the patients and better use of resources, which is especially important in low- and middle-income countries like Brasil. Based on these data, the Brazilian Society of Radiotherapy (Sociedade Brasileira de Radioterapia) organized this consensus to guide and support the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer in Brasil. METHODS: The relevant literature regarding moderate hypofractionation (mHypo) and ultra-hypofractionation (uHypo) was reviewed and discussed by a group of experts from public and private centers of different parts of Brasil. Several key questions concerning clinical indications, outcomes and technological requirements for hypofractionation were discussed and voted. For each question, consensus was reached if there was an agreement of at least 75% of the panel members. RESULTS: The recommendations are described in this article. CONCLUSION: This initiative will assist Brazilian radiation oncologists and medical physicists to safely treat localized prostate cancer patients with hypofractionation.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Brasil , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) accounts for 1-3.5% of breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate dosimetric issues, clinical outcomes, and acute toxicities for SBBC patients receiving synchronous bilateral hypofractionated radiotherapy (SBHRT) and to compare them with patients treated with synchronous bilateral normofractionated RT schedule (SBNRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2016 to March 2020, 39 SBBC patients were referred to our institution. Patients were divided according to their prescription dose: Group A: 50 Gy/25fx (fractions), B: 60-64 Gy/25fx, C: 40.05 Gy/15fx; D: 48 Gy/15fx. Toxicity was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)v.5.0. RESULTS: 34 patients were finally evaluated. Median follow-up was 24 months for NF schedule and 9 months for HF schedule. In the HF schedule, no acute side-effects > G2 were observed and no dermatitis was reported in 6th month´s assessments. 95% of patients have no evidence of disease and only 1 patient presented local relapse in the first mammography after RT. No distant failures or deaths were observed. Regarding dosimetric issues, the inter-patient average Dmean for the heart was: Group A: 5.0 Gy (4.6-5.5), Group B: 4.4 Gy (4.1-5.4), Group C: 4.8 Gy (4.5-5.1) and Group D: 5.3 Gy (4.4-5.6). For the lungs, the inter-patient average Dmean was: Group A: 10.8 Gy (9.8-12.2), Group B: 11.5 Gy (11.3-12), Group C: 9.8 Gy (9.3-10.5) and Group D: 10.5 Gy (10-11.3). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study reporting the safety, feasibility, and tolerability of 40.05 Gy/15fx over 3 weeks for the treatment of SBBC patients. Further study with larger accrual is mandatory.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/radioterapia , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Corazón/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Pulmón/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/cirugía , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Estudios Prospectivos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer requires highly precise delivery through the use of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) is being increasingly used for patient positioning in breast radiotherapy. We aimed to assess the role of SGRT for verification of breast radiotherapy and the tumour bed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective study of 252 patients with early stage breast cancer. A total of 1170 determinations of daily positioning were performed. Breast surface positioning was determined with SGRT (AlignRT) and correlated with the surgical clips in the tumour bed, verified by IGRT (ExacTrac). RESULTS: SGRT improved surface matching by a mean of 5.3 points compared to conventional skin markers (98.0 vs. 92.7), a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01, Wilcoxon Test). For surface matching values > 95%, ≥ 3 clips coincided in 99.7% of the determinations and all markers coincided in 92.5%. For surface matching rates > 90%, the location of ≥ 3 clips coincided in 99.55% of determinations. CONCLUSIONS: SGRT improves patient positioning accuracy compared to skin markers. Optimal breast SGRT can accurately verify the localisation of the tumour bed, ensuring matching with ≥ 3 surgical clips. SGRT can eliminate unwanted radiation from IGRT verification systems.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Marcadores Fiduciales , Humanos , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric impact on hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy of two geometric uncertainty sources: rectum and bladder filling and intrafractional prostate motion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 544 images (375 pre-treatment cone-beam CT [CBCT] and 169 post-treatment CBCT) from 15 prostate adenocarcinoma patients. We recalculated the dose on each pre-treatment CBCT once the positioning errors were corrected. We also recalculated two dose distributions on each post-treatment CBCT, either using or not intrafractional motion correction. A correlation analysis was performed between CBCT-based dose and rectum and bladder filling as well as intrafraction prostate displacements. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between administered and planned rectal doses. However, we observed an increase in bladder dose due to a lower bladder filling in 66% of treatment fractions. These differences were reduced at the end of the fraction since the lower bladder volume was compensated by the filling during the treatment session. A statistically significant reduction in target volume coverage was observed in 27% of treatment sessions and was correlated with intrafractional prostate motion in sagittal plane > 4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: A better control of bladder filling is recommended to minimize the number of fractions in which the bladder volume is lower than planned. Fiducial mark tracking with a displacement threshold of 5 mm in any direction is recommended to ensure that the prescribed dose criteria are met.

Asunto(s)

Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Movimientos de los Órganos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Recto/anatomía & histología , Vejiga Urinaria/anatomía & histología , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Marcadores Fiduciales , Humanos , Masculino , Tamaño de los Órganos , Órganos en Riesgo/anatomía & histología , Órganos en Riesgo/diagnóstico por imagen , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Tolerancia a Radiación , Errores de Configuración en Radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Recto/efectos de la radiación , Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Vejiga Urinaria/efectos de la radiación

RESUMEN

Introducción: El hipofraccionamiento moderado (hRt) en cáncer de próstata, consisten en dismi-nuir el tiempo total de tratamiento con radioterapia, lo que mejora la adherencia terapéutica y opti-miza recursos tecnológicos. En cáncer de próstata, existe evidencia robusta con datos maduros a 5 años de seguimiento, donde se evidenció que hRtno es inferior al tratamiento con fraccionamiento estándar en control oncológico, con menor o igual toxicidad aguda y tardía. Se hace una revisión de la evidencia, dosis de tolerancia, contorneo de volúmenes objetivo (GTV-CTV-PTV) / órganos de ries-go, planificación y reproducibilidad del hRt en cáncer de próstata localizado.

---

Introduction: Moderate hypofractionation (hRt) in prostate cancer consists of reducing the total time of treatment with radiotherapy, which improves therapeutic adherence and optimizes technolog-ical resources. In prostate cancer, there is robust evidence with mature data at 5 years of follow-up, where it was evidenced that hRt is not inferior to treatment with standard fractionation in oncological control, with less or equal acute and late toxicity. A review of the evidence, tolerance dose, contouring of target volumes (GTV-CTV-PTV) / organs at risk, planning and reproducibility of hRt in localized prostate cancer is made.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radioterapia , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Radiación , Dosificación

RESUMEN

AIMS: To report toxicity of a hypofractionated scheme of whole-breast (WB) intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the tumor bed (TB) using Tomotherapy® with Direct modality. METHODS: Patients with early breast cancer, undergoing radiotherapy (RT) in 15 daily fractions to WB (prescription dose 40.05 Gy) and SIB to the TB (48 Gy), between 2013 and 2017, was analyzed. Primary endpoint was acute and intermediate toxicity assessed at the end and within 6 months from RT, according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. Secondary endpoints included early chronic toxicity at 12-months follow-up, using the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Subjective, Objective, Management, and Analytic (LENT-SOMA) scale, and cosmesis using Harvard criteria. RESULTS: The study population was of 287 patients. Acute and intermediate toxicity was collected among 183 patients with data available at the end of RT and within 6 months, 85 (46%) experienced G2 toxicity and 84 (46%) G1 toxicity, while 14 (8%) did not report toxicity at any time. A significant reduction of any grade toxicity was observed between the two time points, with the majority of patients reporting no clinically relevant toxicity at 6 months. At univariate analysis, age < 40 years, breast volume > 1000 cm3 and Dmax ≤ 115% of prescription dose were predictive factors of clinically relevant acute toxicity (G ≥ 2) at any time. At multivariable analysis, only age and breast volume were confirmed as predictive factors, with Relative Risks (95% Confidence Intervals): 2.02 (1.13-3.63) and 1.84 (1.26-2.67), respectively. At 12-month follow-up, 113 patients had complete information on any toxicity with 53% of toxicity G < 2, while cosmetic evaluation, available for 102 patients, reported a good-excellent result for 86% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated WB IMRT with a SIB to the TB, delivered with TomoDirect modality, is safe and well-tolerated. Most patients reported no toxicity after 6 months and good-excellent cosmesis. Predictive factors of clinically relevant toxicity might be considered during treatment planning in order to further reduce side effects.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Factores de Tiempo

Asunto(s)

Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Conventional post-prostatectomy radiation therapy comprises 6.5-8 weeks of treatment, therefore, hypofractionated and shortened schemes arouse increasing interest. We describe our experience regarding feasibility and clinical outcome of a post-prostatectomy moderate hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy schedule MATERIALS AND METHODS: From Oct 2015-Mar 2020, 113 patients, median age of 62 years-old (range 45-76) and prostate adenocarcinoma of low risk (30%), intermediate risk (49%) and high risk (21%) were included for adjuvant (34%) or salvage radiation therapy (66%) after radical prostatectomy (RP). All patients underwent radiotherapy with image-guided IMRT/VMAT to a total dose of 62.5 Gy in 2.5 Gy/fraction in 25 fractions. Sixteen patients (14%) received concomitant androgen deprivation therapy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 29 months (range 3-60 months) all patients but three are alive. Eleven patients (10%) developed exclusive biochemical relapse while 19 patients (17%) presented macroscopically visible relapse: prostatectomy bed in two patients (2%), pelvic lymph nodes in 13 patients (11.5%) and distant metastases in four patients (4%). The 3 years actuarial rates for OS, bFRS, and DMFS were 99.1, 91.1 and 91.2%, respectively. Acute and late tolerance was satisfactory. Maximal acute genitourinary (AGU) toxicity was G2 in 8% of patients; maximal acute gastrointestinal (AGI) toxicity was G2 in 3.5% of patients; maximal late genitourinary (LGU) toxicity was G3 in 1% of patients and maximal late gastrointestinal (LGI) toxicity was G2 in 2% of patients. There were no cases of severe acute or late toxicity. No relationship was found between acute or late GI/GU adverse effects and dosimetric parameters, age, presence of comorbidities or concomitant treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (62.5 Gy in 25 2.5 Gy fractions) is feasible and well tolerated with low complication rates allowing for a moderate dose-escalation that offers encouraging clinical results for biochemical control and survival in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Asunto(s)

Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Anciano , Instituciones Oncológicas , Terapia Combinada , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Several prospective randomized trials have shown that hypofractionation has the same efficacy and safety as the conventional fractionation in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. There are many benefits of hypofractionation, including a more convenient schedule for the patients and better use of resources, which is especially important in low- and middle-income countries like Brasil. Based on these data, the Brazilian Society of Radiotherapy (Sociedade Brasileira de Radioterapia) organized this consensus to guide and support the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer in Brasil. METHODS: The relevant literature regarding moderate hypofractionation (mHypo) and ultra-hypofractionation (uHypo) was reviewed and discussed by a group of experts from public and private centers of different parts of Brasil. Several key questions concerning clinical indications, outcomes and technological requirements for hypofractionation were discussed and voted. For each question, consensus was reached if there was an agreement of at least 75% of the panel members. RESULTS: The recommendations are described in this article. CONCLUSION: This initiative will assist Brazilian radiation oncologists and medical physicists to safely treat localized prostate cancer patients with hypofractionation.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Brasil , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación