RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The proportion of older transplant recipients has increased. Cognitive impairment is not rare after kidney transplant, but data on this issue in liver transplant recipients are scarse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated all liver transplant recipients from a single center in Brazil from July 2018 to June 2020 in terms of cognitive performance to determine the prevalence of neurocognitive disorder. We compared liver transplant recipients with neurocognitive disorder with liver transplant recipients without neurocognitive disorder. We also compared those with an alcoholic cause of liver transplant with other patients. The presence of depressive symptoms was assessed. We performed correlations of clinical data with cognitive scores. RESULTS: In a sample of 100 recipients with median age of 62 years (interquartile range, 56.2-69 y), neurocognitive disorder was present in 21% of the group. Patients with cognitive impairment were older (68 y [61-72] vs 61 y [52-68]; P = .019) and had a trend to higher proportion of persistent kidney injury (33.3% vs 13.9%; P = .055) versus patients without cognitive impairment. Recipients with alcoholic cause of liver transplant exhibited worse cognitive performance in the Mini-Mental State Examination (score of 26 [23.7-28.2] vs 28 [26-29]; P = .024) and the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive (score of 10.4 [8.6-14.2] vs 8 [6.3-10]; P = .008) than other patients. Weak negative correlations were shown in cognitive performance scores versus recipient age (Semantic Verbal Fluency test, r = -0.334 [P = .001]; Clock Drawing test, r = -0.209 [P = .037]; Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive, r = -0.323 [P = .001]). CONCLUSIONS: Neurocognitive disorder was common in liver transplant recipients, in part due to increased age. This study also suggested a role for alcoholic cause of liver transplant and persistent kidney injury in the development of cognitive impairment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is increasing and may impact LT outcomes for patients listed for HCC and other indications. METHODS: Using US adults listed for primary LT (grouped as ALD, HCC, and other) from October 8, 2015, to December 31, 2021, we examined the impact of center-level ALD LT volume (ATxV) on waitlist outcomes in 2 eras: Era 1 (6-month wait for HCC) and Era 2 (MMaT-3). The tertile distribution of ATxV (low to high) was derived from the listed candidates as Tertile 1 (T1): <28.4%, Tertile 2 (T2): 28.4%-37.6%, and Tertile 3 (T3): >37.6% ALD LTs per year. Cumulative incidence of waitlist death and LT within 18 months from listing by LT indication were compared using the Gray test, stratified on eras and ATxV tertiles. Multivariable competing risk regression estimated the adjusted subhazard ratios (sHRs) for the risk of waitlist mortality and LT with interaction effects of ATxV by LT indication (interaction p). RESULTS: Of 56,596 candidates listed, the cumulative waitlist mortality for those with HCC and other was higher and their LT probability was lower in high (T3) ATxV centers, compared to low (T1) ATxV centers in Era 2. However, compared to ALD (sHR: 0.92 [0.66-1.26]), the adjusted waitlist mortality for HCC (sHR: 1.15 [0.96-1.38], interaction p = 0.22) and other (sHR: 1.13 [0.87-1.46], interaction p = 0.16) were no different suggesting no differential impact of ATxV on the waitlist mortality. The adjusted LT probability for HCC (sHR: 0.89 [0.72-1.11], interaction p = 0.08) did not differ by AtxV while it was lower for other (sHR: 0.82 [0.67-1.01], interaction p = 0.02) compared to ALD (sHR: 1.04 [0.80-1.34]) suggesting a differential impact of ATxV on LT probability. CONCLUSIONS: The high volume of LT for ALD does not impact waitlist mortality for HCC and others but affects LT probability for other in the MMAT-3 era warranting continued monitoring.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is a leading indication for liver transplant (LT) in the United States. Rates of early liver transplant (ELT) with less than 6 months of sobriety have increased substantially. Patients who receive ELT commonly have alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) and are often too ill to complete an intensive outpatient program (IOP) for alcohol use disorder (AUD) prior to LT. ELT recipients feel alienated from traditional IOPs. METHODS: We implemented Total Recovery-LT, a tailored virtual outpatient IOP specific for patients under evaluation or waitlisted for LT who were too ill to attend community-based alcohol treatment programs. The 12-week program consisted of weekly group and individual counseling delivered by a master's level Certified Addiction Counselor trained in the basics of LT.  Treatment consisted of 12-Step Facilitation, Motivational Interviewing, and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. We report on program design, implementation, feasibility and early outcomes. RESULTS: From March 2021 to September 2022, 42 patients (36% female, 23 in LT evaluation, 19 post-transplant) enrolled across five cohorts with 76% (32/42) completing the program. Alcohol relapse was more common among noncompleters versus those who completed the program (8/10, 80% vs. 7/32, 22%, p = 0.002). History of trauma or post-traumatic stress symptoms were associated with lower likelihood of completion. Patients' desire for continued engagement after completion led to the creation of a monthly alumni group. CONCLUSIONS: Our integrated IOP model for patients with high-risk AUD in LT evaluation or post-transplant is well-received by patients and could be considered a model for LT programs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Early liver transplantation (LT) for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) has increased worldwide. Short-term outcomes have been favorable, but data on longer-term outcomes are lacking. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study of primary LT recipients between 2010 and 2020, with follow-up through July 1, 2022. Survival analysis was performed using log rank, Cox models, and Kaplan-Meier method. Cox models were created to identify variables associated with mortality; logistic regression to identify variables associated with post-LT alcohol use. RESULTS: Of 708 patients who underwent LT, 110 (15.5%) had ALD and abstinence <6 months prior to LT (ELT), 234 (33.1%) had ALD and alcohol abstinence >6 months (SLT), and 364 (51.4%) had non-ALD diagnoses. Median follow-up was 4.6 years (interquartile range, 2.6-7.3 years). ELT recipients were younger (P = .001) with median abstinence pre-LT of 61.5 days. On adjusted Cox model, post-LT survival was similar in ELT and SLT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; P = .30) and superior to non-ALD (HR, 1.68; P = .04). Alcohol use (40.9% vs 21.8%; P < .001) and harmful alcohol use (31.2% vs 16.0%; P = .002) were more common in ELT recipients. Harmful alcohol use was associated with post-LT mortality on univariate (HR, 1.69; P = .03), but not multivariable regression (HR, 1.54; P = .10). Recurrence of decompensated ALD trended toward more common in ELT (9.1% vs 4.4%; P = .09). Greater than 6 months pre-LT abstinence was associated with a decreased risk of harmful alcohol use (odds ratio, 0.42; P = .001), but not in a multivariable model (odds ratio, 0.71; P = .33). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo ELT for ALD have similar or better survival than other diagnoses in the first 10 years after LT despite a higher incidence of post-LT alcohol use.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) represents the most common indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. Outcomes of LT for ALD are comparable with those of LT for other etiologies; however, ALD is still considered a controversial indication for LT, mainly because it is considered a self-inflicted disease with a high risk of return to alcohol use after LT. Pre-LT evaluation criteria have changed over time, with a progressive re-evaluation of the required pre-transplant duration of abstinence. Despite the fact that some transplant programs still require 6 months of abstinence in order to consider a patient suitable for LT, there is increasing evidence that a pre-transplant abstinence period of <6 months can be considered for well-selected patients. Early LT for severe alcohol-related hepatitis that has not responded to medical therapy has been shown to be an effective therapeutic option with high survival benefit when performed within strict and well-recognized criteria. However, high variability in LT access exists for these patients due to the presence of social and medical stigma. A psycho-social assessment, together with an evaluation by an addiction specialist, should be mandatory in patients with ALD who are potential candidates for LT in order to assess the risk of post-transplant return to alcohol use and to ensure good long-term outcomes. Finally, before LT, attention should be paid to the presence of other potential comorbidities (i.e., cardiovascular and neurological diseases), which could represent a potential contraindication to LT. Similarly, after LT, patients should be adequately monitored for the development of cardiovascular events and screened for "de novo" tumors, although standardized protocols for this monitoring do not exist at this time.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Alcohol-associated liver disease poses a significant global health burden, with rising alcohol consumption and prevalence of alcohol use disorder (AUD) contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. This review examines the challenges and opportunities in the care of candidates and recipients of liver transplant (LT) with AUD. Despite advancements in posttransplant patient survival, the risk of disease recurrence and alcohol relapse remains substantial. Several challenges have been identified, including (1) rising disease burden of alcohol-associated liver disease, variable transplant practices, and systemic barriers; (2) disparities in mental health therapy access and the impact on transplant; (3) variable definitions, underdiagnosis, and stigma affecting access to care; and (4) post-LT relapse, its risk factors, and consequential harm. The review focuses on the opportunities to improve AUD care for candidates and recipients of LT through effective biochemical monitoring, behavioral and pharmacologic approaches, creating Centers of Excellence for post-LT AUD care, advocating for policy reforms, and ensuring insurance coverage for necessary services as essential steps toward improving patient outcomes. The review also highlights unmet needs, such as the scarcity of addiction specialists, and calls for further research on personalized behavioral treatments, digital health, and value-based care models to optimize AUD care in the LT setting.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Since 2018, our program has utilized specific psychosocial criteria and a multidisciplinary approach to assess patients for liver transplant due to alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), rather than the 6-month abstinence rule alone. If declined based on these criteria, specific recommendations are provided to patients and their providers regarding goals for re-referral to increase the potential for future transplant candidacy. Recommendations include engagement in treatment for alcohol use disorder, serial negative biomarker testing, and maintenance of abstinence from alcohol. In our current study, we evaluate the outcomes of patients with ALD, who were initially declined upon assessment and re-referred to our program. This is a retrospective cohort study that includes 98 patients with ALD, who were previously declined for liver transplantation and were subsequently re-referred for liver transplant assessment between May 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. We assess the outcomes of patients who were re-referred including acceptance for transplantation following a second assessment. Of the 98 patients who were re-referred, 46 (46.9%) fulfilled the recommendations made and proceeded to further medical evaluation. Nine were eventually transplanted; others are listed and are waiting for transplant. The presence of a partner was independently associated with a higher rate of acceptance (OR 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.97, p = 0.05). Most of the patients who did not proceed further (n = 52) were declined again due to ALD contraindications (n = 33, 63.4%), including ongoing drinking and lack of engagement in recommended addiction treatment. Others had medical contraindications (11.2%), clinically improved (6.1%), had adherence issues (5.1%), or lack of adequate support (2%). Patients with ALD previously declined for a liver transplant can be re-referred and successfully accepted for transplantation by fulfilling the recommendations made by the multidisciplinary team. Important factors including ongoing abstinence, engagement in addiction treatment, and social support are key for successful acceptance.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The selection of liver transplant (LT) candidates with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is influenced by the risk of alcohol relapse (AR), yet the ability to predict AR is limited. We evaluate psychosocial factors associated with post-LT AR and compare the performance of high-risk alcoholism risk (HRAR), sustained alcohol use post-LT (SALT), and the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) scores in predicting relapse. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ALD patients undergoing LT from 2015 to 2021 at a single US transplant center was performed. Risk factors associated with post-LT AR were evaluated and test characteristics of 3 prediction models were compared. RESULTS: Of 219 ALD LT recipients, 23 (11%) had AR during a median study follow-up of 37.5 mo. On multivariate analysis, comorbid psychiatric illness (odds ratio 5.22) and continued alcohol use after advice from a health care provider (odds ratio 3.8) were found to be significantly associated with post-LT AR. On sensitivity analysis, SIPAT of 30 was optimal on discriminating between ALD LT recipients with and without post-LT AR. SIPAT outperformed both the HRAR and SALT scores (c-statistic 0.67 versus 0.59 and 0.62, respectively) in identifying post-LT AR. However, all scores had poor positive predictive value (<25%). CONCLUSIONS: AR after LT is associated with comorbid psychiatric illness and lack of heeding health care provider advice to abstain from alcohol. Although SIPAT outperformed the HRAR and SALT scores in predicting AR, all are poor predictors. The current tools to predict post-LT AR should not be used to exclude LT candidacy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) has emerged as the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide, with 40% of LTs in the United States performed for ALD in 2019. The ALD-related health care burden accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in young individuals. Alcohol use disorder (AUD), which focuses on the negative effects of alcohol on psychosocial, physical, and mental health, is present in the majority of patients with ALD, with moderate to severe AUD in 75%-80%. During the last decade, early liver transplantation (eLT) has emerged as a lifesaving treatment for selected patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis; these patients may have a higher risk of using alcohol after LT. The risk of alcohol use recurrence may be reduced during the pretransplant or post-transplant period with AUD treatment using behavioral and/or pharmacological therapies and with regular monitoring for alcohol use (self-reported and complemented with biomarkers like phosphatidylethanol). However, AUD treatment in patients with ALD is challenging due to patient, clinician, and system barriers. An integrated model to provide AUD and ALD care by hepatologists and addiction experts in a colocated clinic starting from LT evaluation and selection to monitoring listed candidates and then to following up on recipients of LT should be promoted. However, the integration of addiction and hepatology teams in an LT program in the real world is often present only during evaluation and candidate selection for LT. Data are emerging to show that a multidisciplinary integrated AUD treatment within an LT program reduces recurrent alcohol use after LT. If we want to continue using early liver transplantation for patients with severe alcohol-associated hepatitis, LT programs should focus on building integrated multidisciplinary care teams for the integrated treatment of both AUD and ALD.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is the leading indication for liver transplantation worldwide. Since Mathurin et al. described their experience in providing early liver transplantation for patients with ALD in 2011, other centers have followed suit with generally favorable survival outcomes. This patient population poses a unique clinical challenge given the expedited nature of the evaluation and the lack of any significant sobriety period prior to transplantation. The SALT (Sustained Alcohol Use Post-Liver Transplant) score is a standardized psychometric tool increasingly used to help stratify the risk of relapse and guide listing decisions for these challenging clinical situations. In 2018, our center introduced a protocol for early liver transplantation for acute alcohol-related hepatitis (AAH). In this article, we offer a retrospective review of 26 patients transplanted between May 2018 and May 2021, including at least 1-year follow-up, and compare outcomes to initial SALT scores; we further identify additional factors that may impact post-transplant success. As transplant committees continue to weigh the ethical dilemma of denying lifesaving treatment against the obligation to remain stewards of a limited resource, we aim to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of risk regarding early transplantation for ALD.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: If alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are now the two main indications for liver transplantation (LT), it has been recognized that both conditions can coexist in varying degrees and the concept of dual-aetiology fatty liver disease (DAFLD) has been proposed. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate, in a cohort of patients transplanted for ALD and NAFLD, the prevalence of DAFLD before LT and the impact on liver graft outcome. METHODS: From 1990 to 2010, all patients who underwent LT for the so-called ALD or NAFLD in our centre were included. Before LT, DAFLD was defined as patients with a history of excessive alcohol consumption and obesity associated with either diabetes or hypertension. Before LT, patients were separated into three groups: DAFLD, ALD, and NAFLD. Fatty liver graft disease was classified according to the FLIP algorithm. RESULTS: Out of 907, adult LT recipients were identified: 33 DAFLD patients, 333 ALD patients, and 24 NAFLD patients. After LT, ALD patients experienced significantly more alcohol relapse than DAFLD patients, who had twice more post-LT metabolic syndrome. Out of 926, post-LT biopsies, DAFLD patients had significantly more fatty liver graft disease due to metabolic syndrome features than ALD patients. CONCLUSION: Our results support that DAFLD recently emerged as an indication of LT. In the future, this particular population needs to be identified as a specific entity since post-LT outcome on the graft is different from ALD and more similar to NAFLD patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggest disparities exist in liver transplantation (LT) for alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). As the incidence of ALD increases, we aimed to characterize recent trends in ALD LT frequency and outcomes, including racial and ethnic disparities. METHODS: Using United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data (2015 through 2021), we evaluated LT frequency, waitlist mortality, and graft survival among US adults with ALD (alcohol-associated hepatitis [AH] and alcohol-associated cirrhosis [AAC]) stratified by race and ethnicity. We used adjusted competing-risk regression analysis to evaluate waitlist outcomes, Kaplan-Meier analysis to illustrate graft survival, and Cox proportional hazards modeling to identify factors associated with graft survival. RESULTS: There were 1211 AH and 26 526 AAC new LT waitlist additions, with 970 AH and 15 522 AAC LTs performed. Compared with non-Hispanic White patients (NHWs) with AAC, higher hazards of waitlist death were observed for Hispanic (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.32), Asian (SHR = 1.22, 95% CI:1. 01-1.47), and American Indian/Alaskan Native (SHR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.15-1.76) candidates. Similarly, significantly higher graft failures were observed in non-Hispanic Black (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.09-1.61) and American Indian/Alaskan Native (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.15-2.38) patients with AAC than NHWs. We did not observe differences in waitlist or post-LT outcomes by race or ethnicity in AH, although analyses were limited by small subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Significant racial and ethnic disparities exist for ALD LT frequency and outcomes in the United States. Compared with NHWs, racial and ethnic minorities with AAC experience increased risk of waitlist mortality and graft failure. Efforts are needed to identify determinants for LT disparities in ALD that can inform intervention strategies.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The high prevalence of obesity in the United States drives the burden of NASH, recently renamed as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). We assessed the most recent trends in liver transplantation in the United States. METHODS: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR 2013-2022) was used to select adult (18 years or above) candidates who underwent liver transplant. RESULTS: There were 116,292 candidates who underwent liver transplant with known etiology of chronic liver disease. In candidates without HCC, the most common etiology was alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), increasing from 23% (2013) to 48% (2022), followed by NASH/MASH, which increased from 19% to 27%; the rates of viral hepatitis decreased (chronic hepatitis C: 28%-4%; chronic hepatitis B: 1.8%-1.1%) (all trend p<0.01). The proportion of HCC decreased from 25% (2013-2016) to 17% (2021-2022). Among HCC cohort, the proportion of chronic hepatitis C decreased from 60% (2013) to 27% (2022), NASH/MASH increased from 10% to 31%, alcohol-associated liver disease increased from 9% to 24% (trend p<0.0001), and chronic hepatitis B remained stable between 5% and 7% (trend p=0.62). The rapid increase in the proportion of NASH/MASH in HCC continued during the most recent study years [20% (2018), 28% (2020), 31% (2022)]; the trend remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant etiologies in the United States have changed over the last decade. Alcohol-associated liver disease and NASH/MASH remain the 2 most common indications for transplantation among those without HCC, and NASH/MASH is the most common in patients with HCC.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) is being increasingly performed for alcohol-related liver disease (ALD). It is unclear whether the increasing frequency of LTs in ALD patients has a negative impact on deceased-donor (DDLT) allocation and whether the current policy of 6 months of abstinence before transplantation effectively prevents recidivism after transplantation or improves long-term outcomes. METHODS: A total of 506 adult LT recipients, including 97 ALD patients, were enrolled. The outcomes of ALD patients were compared with those of non-ALD patients. The 97 ALD patients were further divided into group A (6-month abstinence) and group N (nonabstinence) based on the pretransplant alcohol withdrawal period. The incidence of relapsed drinking and the long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The prevalence of LT for ALD significantly increased after 2016 (27.0% vs 14.0%; p < 0.01), but the frequency of DDLT for ALD remained unchanged (22.6% vs 34.1%, p = 0.210). After a median follow-up of 56.9 months, patient survival was comparable between the ALD and non-ALD patients (1, 3, and 5 years posttransplant: 87.6%, 84.3%, and 79.5% vs 82.8%, 76.6%, and 72.2%, respectively; p = 0.396). The results were consistent irrespective of the transplant type and disease severity. In ALD patients, 22 of the 70 (31.4%) patients reported relapsed drinking after transplantation, and the prevalence in group A had a higher tendency than that in group N (38.3% vs 17.4%, p = 0.077). Six months of abstinence or nonabstinence did not result in a survival difference, and de novo malignancies were the leading cause of late patient death in ALD patients. CONCLUSION: LT achieves favorable outcomes for ALD patients. Six months of abstinence pretransplant did not predict the risk of recidivism after transplantation. The high incidence of de novo malignancies in these patients warrants a more comprehensive physical evaluation and better lifestyle modifications to improve long-term outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Liver transplant (LT) is a highly effective therapy for refractory severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (SAH), but optimal selection criteria remain unknown. We aim to evaluate the outcomes of patients who received LT for alcohol-associated liver disease at our center following the introduction of updated selection criteria, including the removal of the minimum sobriety requirement. METHODS: Data were collected on all patients who underwent LT for alcohol-associated liver disease from January 1, 2018, to September 30, 2020. Patients were divided into SAH and cirrhosis cohorts based on disease phenotype. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients underwent LT for alcohol-associated liver disease, including 89 (72.4%) for cirrhosis and 34 (27.6%) for SAH. There was no difference in 1- (97.1 ± 2.9% vs. 97.7 ± 1.6%, p = 0.97) and 3-year (97.1 ± 2.9% vs. 92.4 ± 3.4%, p = 0.97) survival between SAH and cirrhosis cohorts. Return to alcohol use was more frequent in the SAH cohort at 1 year (29.4 ± 7.8% vs. 11.4 ± 3.4%, p = 0.005) and 3 years (45.1 ± 8.7% vs. 21.0 ± 6.2%, p = 0.005) including higher frequencies of both slips and problematic drinking. Unsuccessful alcohol use counseling (HR 3.42, 95% CI 1.12-10.5) and prior alcohol support meetings (HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.03-8.83) predicted a return to harmful alcohol use patterns in early LT recipients. Both duration of sobriety (c-statistic 0.32 (95% CI 0.34-0.43) and SALT score (c-statistic 0.47, 95% CI 0.34-0.60) were independently poor predictors of return to harmful drinking. CONCLUSION: Survival following LT was excellent in both SAH and cirrhosis cohorts. Higher rates of return to alcohol use highlight the importance of further individualized refinement of selection criteria and improved support following LT.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is among the most common indications for liver transplantation (LTX) in Europe and North America, with good five-year survival rates post-LTX. Here we evaluated survival up to and beyond 20 years after LTX for patients with ALD compared to a comparison group. METHODS: Patients with ALD and a comparison group transplanted in the Nordic countries between 1982 and 2020 were included. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier curves and predictors of survival were assessed with Cox-regressions. RESULTS: 831 patients with ALD and 2979 patients in the comparison group were included in the study. Patients with ALD were older at the time of LTX (p < .001) and more likely to be male (p < .001). The estimated median follow-up time was 9.1 years for the ALD-group and 11.1 years for the comparison group. 333 (40.1%) patients with ALD and 1010 (33.9%) patients in the comparison group died during follow-up. The overall survival was impaired for patients with ALD compared to the comparison group (p < .001) and was evident for male and female patients, patients transplanted before and after 2005, and observed in all age-groups except patients over 60 years. Age at transplant, waiting time, year of LTX and country of LTX were associated with decreased survival after LTX for patients with ALD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ALD have a decreased long-term survival following LTX. This difference was evident in most sub-groups of patients and warrants close follow-up of liver transplanted patients with ALD with focus on risk reduction.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)