RESUMEN

To explore the biomechanical effects of different internal fixation methods on femoral neck fractures under various postoperative conditions, mechanical analyses were conducted, including static and dynamic assessments. Ultimately, a mechanical stability evaluation system was established to determine the weights of each mechanical index and the evaluation scores for each sample. In static analysis, it was found that the mechanical stability of each model met the fixation requirements post-fracture. During the healing process, the maximum stress on the hollow nail slightly increased, and stress distribution shifted from multi-point to a more uniform single-point distribution, which contributes to fracture healing and reduces the risk of stress concentration. In dynamic analysis, resonance points frequently occurred at low frequencies. With increasing walking speed, the maximum stress increased significantly. At slow speeds, the maximum stress approached the material's yield limit. Under cyclic dynamic loading, the number of cycles barely met the requirements of the healing period, and increasing walking speed may lead to fatigue fractures. The evaluation model established in this study comprehensively considers different mechanical performances in static and dynamic analyses. Based on various mechanical analyses and evaluation systems, the applicability of internal fixation treatment plans can be assessed from multiple dimensions, providing the optimal simulated mechanical solution for each case of femoral neck fracture treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between the surgical approach used for hemiarthroplasty and periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) is not well understood. We have previously described a decrease in BMD 1 year postoperatively. Here, we assessed the medium-term changes in periprosthetic BMD. METHODS: We performed a follow-up study of patients with femoral neck fracture (FNF) who underwent uncemented hemiarthoplasty using a direct lateral or anterolateral approach. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used to evaluate the changes in BMD in 23 patients over 5 years. RESULTS: A mean 6% loss of total BMD occurred over 1 year, but between 1 and 5 years, BMD was restored to the baseline value. The mean total BMD in the anterolateral group had decreased by 2% after 3 months and 3% after 12 months, and increased by 2% after 5 years, vs. decreases of 7%, 8%, and 3% for the direct lateral group. Between 1 and 5 years, BMD increased in Gruen zones 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 in both groups. There was a significantly larger increase in zone 4 in the lateral group (4%) than the anterolateral group. CONCLUSION: The surgical approach affects periprosthetic BMD in patients with FNF. Furthermore, BMD is restored to the baseline value 5 years postoperatively.ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03753100.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and differences in biomechanical characteristics between the femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated cancellous screws (CCSs) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed a cohort of 38 registered cases of femoral neck fractures treated surgically with either the FNS (n = 17) or CCSs (n = 21) between January 2020 and December 2023. Indicators such as fluoroscopy frequency, length of hospital stay, and fracture healing time were compared between the two groups. Functional status was evaluated via the Harris hip score (HHS) and visual analogue scale (VAS), whereas prognosis was assessed based on changes in the neck shaft angle and femoral neck shortening. Additionally, six sets of femoral neck fracture models were developed based on Pauwels angles of 30°, 40°, 50°, 60°, 70°, and 80°. Two experimental groups, FNS and CCS, were established, and a joint reaction force of 1800 N was applied to the proximal femur. The displacement, stress, and stiffness of the components of interest in the different models were tested and compared. RESULTS: The distributions of all the baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). The FNS group presented significantly shorter fluoroscopy frequency, length of hospital stay, and fracture healing time (p < 0.05). Harris and VAS scores were higher in the FNS group than in the CCS group (p < 0.05). Postoperative changes in the neck shaft angle and femoral neck shortening were significantly lower in the FNS group than in the CCS group (p < 0.05). The results of the finite element analysis indicated that the maximum stress on the femoral head and varus angle were generally lower in the FNS group than in the CCS group and that the maximum displacement of the femoral head and FNS was generally lower in the FNS group than in the CCS group. However, the superiority of FNS over CCS decreased with increasing Pauwels angle. Additionally, the effectiveness of FNS in limiting displacement of the femoral neck upper wall was not as favourable as that of CCS. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of femoral neck fractures with FNS is superior and contributes to improved hip joint function. Biomechanical research has confirmed its structural stability and advantages in resisting femoral head varus. However, challenges to its fixation efficacy persist, particularly at higher Pauwels angles.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Displaced femoral neck fractures are associated with a high revision rate. The new femoral neck system(FNS) offers advantages in fixation stability, potentially reducing the need for revision. The purpose of this study was to compare the revision rate of patients with different reduction quality treated with the FNS and cannulated screws (CS). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with Garden III or IV femoral neck fractures who underwent osteosynthesis in a level 1 trauma center between July 2019 and June 2023. A total of 141 cases met the inclusion criteria and received treatment with either the FNS (N = 65) or CS (N = 76). The quality of fracture reduction, surgical complications (such as femoral neck shortening, avascular necrosis of femoral head, nonunion of fracture, implant failure and withdrawal), revision surgery and the reasons for revision were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the 141 cases was 52.0 years (range 18-65); with sixty-five cases being male (46.1%). Eighty-four fractures (59.6%) were classified as Garden type III. Reduction quality was good in 71 cases (50.4%) and fair in 70 cases. The mean follow-up period was 25.9 months (range 12-46). A total of 26 cases(18.4%) underwent revision surgery. The revision rate in cases with good reduction was 11.3% (8/71 cases), with seven cases (four hardware removal and three arthroplasty) in the CS group and one case (arthroplasty for fracture nonunion and implant failure) in the FNS group, a significant difference was found between the two groups(P = 0.041). Among the 18 cases (25.7%, 18/70) with fair reduction who underwent revision surgery, nine cases (six hardware removal and three arthroplasty) in the CS group, and nine cases (arthroplasty for implant failure and cut-out) in the FNS group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.672). The total revision rate between the FNS group (15.4%, 10/65) and the CS group (21.1%, 16/76) was not significantly different (P = 0.387). CONCLUSIONS: The total revision rate between the FNS and CS group showed no difference. However, in cases with good reduction, the revision rate was lower in the FNS group compared to the CS group.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: There is currently a lack of in-depth comparative evaluation regarding the biomechanical properties of novel intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of basal femoral neck fractures (BFNF). This study aims to utilize finite element analysis to compare the performance differences of two novel devices with traditional PFNA and InterTan nails in the fixation of BFNF. METHODS: Based on a validated finite element model, this study constructed an accurate BFNF model and implanted four different intramedullary nail devices: PFNA, InterTan nail, PFBN (proximal femoral biomimetic nail), and NIS (novel intramedullary system). Under a vertical load of 2100N, the displacement and Von Mises stress (VMS) distribution of each group of models were evaluated through simulation testing. RESULTS: Under a load of 2100N, the PFBN device exhibited the best performance in terms of displacement and peak stress, while PFNA performed poorly. The peak displacement of the NIS device was lower than that of PFNA and InterTan nails, while the peak stress of the InterTan nail was lower than that of PFNA and NIS. CONCLUSION: The PFBN device demonstrates stronger load-bearing and shear-resistant properties in the treatment of BFNF, and the NIS device also shows significant improvement in stability. Therefore, both the PFBN and NIS devices are reliable internal fixation techniques for the treatment of CFIFs, with potential clinical application prospects.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze and assess the long-term effectiveness of robotic navigation and traditional closed reduction internal fixation in the treatment of Delbet type II femoral neck fracture in children. METHODS: A total of fifty-five patients diagnosed with pediatric Delbet type II femoral neck fracture, who were admitted to Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2018 and June 2022, were included in this study. Among them, 22 cases of nailing under robotic navigation were set as the observation group, and 33 cases of nailing under fluoroscopy of the C-arm machine were set as the control group. All patients had their femoral neck fractures closed and repositioned first. After confirming the satisfactory fracture repositioning under the fluoroscopic view of the C-arm machine, internal fixation was performed by inserting hollow compression screws in the corresponding surgical way.A comparative analysis was conducted between the two groups to assess the disparity in the amount of X-ray exposure during surgery, the number of guide pins inserted, and the duration of the surgical procedure. The quality of comparative fracture reduction was assessed according to the Haidukewych criteria on the first postoperative hip X-ray, and the parallelism and distribution of the comparative screws were measured. The incidence of hip function and postoperative complications according to the Ratliff criteria were evaluated between each of the subgroups at the final follow-up. RESULTS: Comparison of general information, operation duration, and quality of fracture reduction between the two groups failed to reveal statistically significant results (P > 0.05). The observation group had a lower number of X-ray exposures and guide pin placements compared to the control group, and this difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).At the last follow-up, the observation group exhibited superior screw parallelism and distribution, as well as hip joint function, compared to the control group, and this difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Closed reduction and internal fixation under orthopedic robot navigation can achieve better long-term efficacy in treating Delbet type II femoral neck fracture in children.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In pediatric patients, femoral neck fracture is a relatively rare injury with a high complication rate despite proper diagnosis and treatment. Fixation of femoral neck fractures is usually performed with screws placed along the neck axis. In this study, we aim to compare two different implants and methods in terms of biomechanics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight right-left fresh femur bones of 6-month-old male Ovis aries lambs grown on the same farm were used. Bones were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=7). In group 1, the Delbet type III femoral neck fracture model was fixed with two 4.5 mm cannulated screws, one screw crossing the physis. In group 2, two 4.5 mm cannulated screws, which did not cross the physis, were used. In group 3, Delbet type III femoral neck fracture model was fixed with a 3.5 mm proximal femoral anatomical plate and five screws, one screw crossing the physis. Finally, in group 4, Delbet type III femoral neck fracture model was fixed with one 3.5 mm proximal femoral anatomical plate and five screws that did not exceed the physis. RESULTS: Biomechanical tests were performed using a Zwick/Roell AllroundLine 100 kN device. While axial failure burden (F = 6.819, p<.05, d = .46) and axial stiffness (F = 3.576, p<.05, d = .30) have been found to be significantly different between the independent treatment groups, axial failure displacement (F = .622, p>.05) and axial failure energy (F = .727, p>.05) have been found not to be significant between the independent groups. The effect sizes of the axial failure load and axial stiffness variables were 0.46 and 0.30, respectively, suggesting a moderate clinical effect. The highest axial failure load was recorded in group 3, while the smallest load was recorded in group 2. Similarly, the axial stiffness level in group 3 was statistically higher than the axial stiffness measurement recorded in group 2, p<.05. CONCLUSIONS: Consequently, we found that the biomechanical fixation success was the highest with a 3.5 mm proximal femoral anatomical plate, a 3.5 mm locking screw crossing the physis, and five 3.5 mm screws.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that positive buttress is as effective as anatomical reduction in treating young femoral neck fractures, but whether this effect is related to the Pauwels classification remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical prognosis of positive buttress in young femoral neck fractures with different Pauwels classifications, as well as to assess its biomechanical properties. METHODS: A total of 170 young patients with femoral neck fractures who were treated with three cannulated screws were included in this study. Patients were divided into three groups based on their preoperative Pauwels classification. Each group was divided into three subgroups based on the reduction quality: positive buttress, negative buttress and anatomical reduction. The femoral neck shortening, the incidence of necrosis of the femoral head (AVN) and the Harris hip scores at the last follow-up were compared across the three reduction quality within each Pauwels classification. Subsequently, a volunteer was recruited, CT data of the hip was obtained, and finite element models representing different reduction quality under varying Pauwels classifications were established. The biomechanical properties of each model were then evaluated following the application of strains. RESULTS: In Pauwels type I, there were no significant differences in postoperative femoral neck shortening, incidence of AVN, or Harris score among the three types of reduction quality (P > 0.05). However, positive buttress provided superior biomechanical stability compared to negative buttress and anatomical reduction. In Pauwels type II, the incidence of AVN was similar between the positive buttress and the anatomical reduction groups, and both were significantly lower than that in the negative buttress (P < 0.05). The Harris score of the positive buttress was higher than that of the negative buttress, and there was no significant difference in the occurrence of femoral neck shortening between the three groups (P > 0.05). Finite element analysis showed that the biomechanical stability of positive buttress was equivalent to anatomical reduction, and both were better than negative buttress. In Pauwels type III, the incidence of AVN in the anatomical reduction group was lower than that in both the positive buttress and negative buttress (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of AVN or femoral neck shortening between positive buttress and negative buttress (P > 0.05). There was also no difference in postoperative Harris scores between the three reduction qualities (P > 0.05). Both positive buttress and negative buttress exhibited identical biomechanical qualities and were inferior to anatomical reduction. CONCLUSIONS: The biomechanical and clinical dominance of positive buttress correlates with Pauwels type. Specifically, Positive buttress is biomechanically stable in Pauwels types I and II. In Pauwels type III, positive buttress is not advantageous. As the Pauwels angle increases, the biomechanical benefit of the positive buttress is lost. Therefore, regardless of the Pauwels classification, negative buttress should be avoided after reduction of femoral neck fractures in young patients.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures are a serious public health problem with high rates of morbidity, mortality, disability and care costs. The aim of the research was to perform cost effectiveness analysis of hip fracture treatments using proximal femoral nail and bipolar hemiarthroplasty surgeries. METHODS: The analysis was completed based on the perspectives of the paying institution and patient. A decision tree model was used to determine whether proximal femoral nail or bipolar arthroplasty was most cost effective for the management of a femoral neck fracture in this patient population. RESULTS: The findings from the decision tree model suggested that ICERs for BHP were TRY 43,164.53 TL/QALY based on reimbursement and TRY 3,977.35 TL/QALY based on patient expenditures. Compared to the calculated threshold value of TRY 60.575 TL, we concluded BHP to be a cost-effective option. Moreover, all parameter changes yielded stable results on the one-way sensitivity analysis. When it comes to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, BHP with specified threshold value was found to be cost-effective in all the comparisons. Currently available data the use of bipolar hemiarthroplasty as the more cost- effective treatment strategy in this specific population. CONCLUSION: Overall, our findings showed HA as a cost-effective surgical technique at the calculated threshold in a population over 60 years of age. The impacts of HA on patients' quality of life and costs are remarkable.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of femoral neck fractures in older adults is increasing each year. Active and reasonable postoperative rehabilitation exercises can restore the activity of geriatric patients with femoral neck fractures to a great extent, while also avoiding bedridden complications and re-fractures. This study explores the perspectives, experiences, and recommendations of medical staff regarding the implementation status, existing problems, promoting factors, and hindering factors of post-surgical rehabilitation exercises for geriatric patients with femoral neck fractures. The ultimate goal is to further optimize rehabilitation exercise programs and to expedite this process for patients. METHODS: A qualitative, descriptive phenomenological study was conducted. A total of 21 clinical medical staff were selected using the purposive sampling method for semi-structured interviews. A content analysis method was used to collate and analyze the collected interview data. RESULTS: A total of 2 themes and 6 sub-themes were defined. The themes consisted of multiple obstacles occurring during the implementation of rehabilitation exercises and the scientific cognition of medical staff on these exercises. Respondents found that patient initiative during rehabilitation exercises was insufficient, that the comprehensiveness and continuity of exercises could not be guaranteed, and that unification between textbook theory and clinical practice was incomplete. Moreover, respondents believed that their professional quality should be excellent, but that staffing and organizational management required optimization, and that support was required for the implementation of rehabilitation exercises. CONCLUSION: This study investigated the opinions and experiences of medical staff during postoperative rehabilitation exercises in geriatric patients with femoral neck fractures. Collaborative efforts should fully engage hospitals, communities, and families, enhance the alignment of health education with patient needs, advance the scientific development of an integrated medical model by refining the curriculum and teaching system, and significantly elevate the level of medical science and technology. This study will serve as a valuable reference for the establishment of future professional, and personalized rehabilitation programs tailored for geriatric patients with femoral neck fractures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This case report describes a woman in her 70s who presented with a 3-month history of hip pain and inability to walk. Upon admission, she was diagnosed with the extremely rare condition of complete femoral head disappearance. A comprehensive examination was conducted to determine the cause and devise an effective treatment strategy, taking the patient's medical history into account. Through interdisciplinary discussions, occult infection and other potential causes were ruled out. The femoral head disappearance was ultimately determined to be due to wear, ischemia, and absorption following a fracture. After informing the patient of the diagnosis and treatment plan, total hip arthroplasty was proposed. This case highlights the rarity and severity of femoral head disappearance in patients with femoral neck fractures, emphasizing the effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty and appropriate joint prostheses in managing such cases. This case has significant implications for clinical diagnosis, treatment, and complication prevention. The report also discusses the causes of acquired femoral head disappearance, relevant diagnostic assessments, and alternative treatment options.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To improve the scientificity and accuracy of this study. METHOD: We studied the research methods of the article by carefully reading the author 's article and consulting the relevant literature. RESULT: The authors performed an excellent and meaningful work, finding that FNS appeared advantageous over CCS in Harris Hip Scores (HHS), operative time, and reoperation rates, providing clinicians with a basis for selecting internal fixation methods. It is a useful reference, but there are still some problems. CONCLUSION: In order to improve the scientific nature of the study, we believe that some aspects may need to be improved.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Most patients presenting with a hip fracture regardless of their comorbidities are surgically treated. A growing body of research states that a certain type of elderly patient could benefit more from a palliative approach. OBJECTIVE: Identify the patient who would benefit most from a palliative care approach instead of a surgery. DESIGN: Exploratory-matched retrospective cohort study between 2015 and 2021. SETTING: Single Level 1 Trauma Center. PARTICIPANTS: There were 2240 hip fracture patients admitted to our institution between 2015 and 2021. Patients over 65 years old with intertrochanteric or femoral neck fractures could be included. A total of 129 patients opted for palliative care (Palliative Group = PG). This cohort was compared to a matched cohort (for age, sex and fracture type) who underwent surgery but died within three months of the procedure (Surgery Deceased Group = SDG) and another matched cohort who survived more than three months (Surgery Alive Group = SAG) following surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Medical charts were reviewed for patient demographics, autonomy level, level of care, neurocognitive disorders (NCD), fracture type, in-hospital data and outpatient death within three months of admission. Analysis was performed through univariate and multivariate models with SAS OnDemand for Academics (alpha 0.05). RESULTS: Patients in the PG (n = 129) were 88.2 ± 7.2 years old, 71.3% were females, and 61.2% had a femoral neck fracture. Patients in the SDG (n = 95) and SAG (n = 107) were well matched. The PG differed from the SDG (n = 95) and SAG (n = 107) regarding NCD (85.3% vs. 57.9% vs. 36.4%, p < 0.01) and the presence of Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) (19.4% vs. 5.3% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.01). There were more known heart failure (24.2% vs. 16.3%, p < 0.01) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in the SDG group than in the PG group (26.6 vs. 14.7%, p = 0.02). Patients in the SAG have a significant lower rate of NCD (OR 2,7 (95%CI 1,5-5,0)), heart failure (OR 5,7 (95%CI 1,9-16,4)) and COPD (OR 2,8 (95%CI 1,2-6,3)) than other groups. Prefracture mobility, autonomy and living situation significantly differed between the groups. Median survival was six days in PG and 17 days in SDG. All groups lost autonomy and mobility. There were more complications in the SDG group than in the PG group. The end-of-care trajectory was death or hospice for most patients in the PG and SDG groups. More than 30% of the SAG group could not return home at discharge. CONCLUSION: The presence of an NCD and diminished prefracture autonomy strongly support counseling for palliative care. The high rate of complications when surgery is proposed for frail patients with multiple comorbidities suggests that the concept of palliative surgery needs to be revisited.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the early postoperative mortality and morbidity in older patients with a fracture of the femoral neck, between those who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and those who underwent hemiarthroplasty. Methods: This nationwide, retrospective cohort study used data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. We included older patients (aged ≥ 60 years) who underwent THA or hemiarthroplasty after a femoral neck fracture, between July 2010 and March 2022. A total of 165,123 patients were included. The THA group was younger (mean age 72.6 (SD 8.0) vs 80.7 years (SD 8.1)) and had fewer comorbidities than the hemiarthroplasty group. Patients with dementia or malignancy were excluded because they seldom undergo THA. The primary outcome measures were mortality and complications while in hospital, and secondary outcomes were readmission and reoperation within one and two years after discharge, and the costs of hospitalization. We conducted an instrumental variable analysis (IVA) using differential distance as a variable. Results: The IVA analysis showed that the THA group had a significantly higher rate of complications while in hospital (risk difference 6.3% (95% CI 2.0 to 10.6); p = 0.004) than the hemiarthroplasty group, but there was no significant difference in the rate of mortality while in hospital (risk difference 0.3% (95% CI -1.7 to 2.2); p = 0.774). There was no significant difference in the rate of readmission (within one year: risk difference 1.3% (95% CI -1.9 to 4.5); p = 0.443; within two years: risk difference 0.1% (95% CI -3.2 to 3.4); p = 0.950) and reoperation (within one year: risk difference 0.3% (95% CI -0.6 to 1.1); p = 0.557; within two years: risk difference 0.1% (95% CI -0.4 to 0.7); p = 0.632) after discharge. The costs of hospitalization were significantly higher in the THA group than in the hemiarthroplasty group (difference $2,634 (95% CI $2,496 to $2,772); p < 0.001). Conclusion: Among older patients undergoing surgery for a femoral neck fracture, the risk of early complications was higher after THA than after hemiarthroplasty. Our findings should aid in clinical decision-making in these patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are known to have significant morbidity and mortality rates. Multiple chronic conditions (MCC) are defined as the presence of two or more chronic diseases that greatly affect the quality of life in older adults. The aim of this study is to explore the impact of MCC and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) on surgical outcomes in patients with FNF. METHODS: Patients with FNF who underwent joint replacement surgery were selected for this study. Patients who had two or more diseases simultaneously were divided into two groups: the MCC group and the non-MCC (NMCC) group. The CCI was calculated to assess the severity of patients' comorbidities in the MCC group. Baseline data, surgical details, and prognosis-related indicators were analyzed and compared between the two patient groups. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between CCI and length of hospital stay, Harris score, skeletal muscle index (SMI), and age. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the risk factors for mortality in FNF patients at 1 and 5 years after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included in the MCC group, while the NMCC group consisted of 40 patients. However, the patients in the MCC group were found to be older, had a higher incidence of sarcopenia, and lower SMI values (p < 0.001). Patients in the MCC group had longer hospitalization times, lower Harris scores, higher intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, and higher complication rates (p = 0.045, p = 0.035, p = 0.019, p = 0.010). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that CCI was positively correlated with hospitalization and age (p < 0.001, p < 0.001), while it was negatively correlated with Harris score and SMI value (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that MCC patients had higher 1-year and 5-year mortality rates. Hospitalization time was identified as a risk factor for death in FNF patients 1 year after joint replacement (p < 0.001), whereas CCI and age were identified as risk factors for death 5 years after surgery (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis results showed that the difference in death time between the two groups of patients with MCC and NMCC was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed that CCI, age and SMI were risk factors affecting patient death. CONCLUSION: The surgical prognosis of patients with MCC, CCI and FNF is related. The higher the CCI, the worse the patient's function and the higher the long-term risk of death.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of biplanar vertical fixation and inverted triangle fixation with hollow screw for Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients. Methods: The clinical data of 55 young and middle-aged patients with Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture between June 2021 and December 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation with hollow screws, 25 cases were treated with biplanar vertical fixation (study group), 30 cases with inverted triangle fixation (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, affected side, cause of injury, underlying diseases, and time from injury to operation between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fluoroscopy times, guide needle puncture times, starting time of weight bearing, time of full weight bearing, time of fracture healing, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The hip joint function was evaluated by Harris score at 1 day, 6 months, 12 months after operation, and at last follow-up, and the pain relief was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The femoral neck shortening was measured on the X-ray film at last follow-up. Results: All patients were followed up 12-31 months (mean, 22.0 months), and there was no significant difference in follow-up time between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and fluoroscopy times in the study group were higher than those in the control group, but the difference was not significant ( P>0.05). The guide needle puncture times in the study group was more than that in the control group, and the time of starting weight bearing and the time of full weight bearing in the study group were shorter than those in the control group, the differences were significant ( P<0.05). Bony healing was achieved in both groups, and there was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups ( P>0.05). No osteonecrosis of the femoral head and incision-related complication was found in the two groups during follow-up, and the femoral neck shortening length in the study group was significantly shorter than that in the control group at last follow-up ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in Harris score between the two groups at 1 day after operation ( P>0.05), and the Harris score of the study group was significantly better than that of the control group at other time points ( P<0.05); there was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups at each time point after operation ( P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with the inverted triangle fixation, the treatment of Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fracture with biplanar vertical fixation can effectively reduce femoral neck shortening without affecting fracture healing, and improve hip joint function in early stage.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is still debatable which is the least invasive approach to the hip joint in arthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture (FNF). We compared the traditional direct lateral approach (DLA) with the direct anterior approach (DAA) regarding creatine kinase (CK), C-reactive protein (CRP), and hemoglobin (Hb). METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, 130 elderly patients with dislocated FNFs treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) were included. CK, CRP, and Hb were measured preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 to 4 and were compared between the DAA and DLA groups using repeated measures mixed-effect models. RESULTS: The CK level was significantly higher on the 1st postoperative day in the DLA group, 597 U/L (95% confidence interval [CI] 529-666) vs 461 U/L (CI 389-532), estimated mean difference (MD) 136 U/L (CI 38-235). The CRP levels were significantly higher on postoperative days 3 and 4 in the DLA group, 207 mg/L (CI 189-226) vs 161 mg/L (CI 143-180), estimated MD 46 mg/L (CI 19-72) and 162 mg/L (CI 144-181) vs 121 (CI 102-140), estimated MD 41 mg/L (CI 15-68). Blood loss, expressed as difference in Hb, did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: In an elderly population with FNFs, we found that the DAA, compared with the DLA, results in less CK and CRP increase, but no change in Hb.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical performance of the Gamma 3 nail with an anti-rotation screw (GNS) and compare it to two established gold-standard methods for treating unstable femoral neck fractures (UFNFs). Synthetic bone models were prepared with Pauwels' type III osteotomy and an additional posterior wedge. Three different implant configurations were tested: three cannulated crews (3CS) in an inverted triangle configuration, a dynamic hip screw with an anti-rotation screw (DHSS), and GNS. Non-destructive cyclic axial loading was applied at 7° adduction, with 1000 cycles ranging from 100 to 1000 N. Subsequently, a construct failure test was conducted using progressive axial compression, and fracture reduction loss was recorded. The average axial stiffness was 321 ± 52 N/mm for 3CS, 430 ± 71 N/mm for DHSS, and 519 ± 104 N/mm for GNS. The average ultimate failure loads were 2699.3 N for 3CS, 3427.1 N for DHSS, and 3758.9 N for GNS. GNS demonstrated significantly greater axial stiffness compared to the other two groups (P < 0.05). Both DHSS and GNS exhibited similar failure loading, which were greater than those of 3CS (P < 0.05). GNS offers the advantages of a minimally invasive and intramedullary implant with comparable stability to the DHSS system. Moreover, GNS demonstrated superior biomechanical performance compared to 3 CS configuration.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment method for managing unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of two types of Femoral Neck Anti-rotation and Support System (FNAS) and a Femoral Neck System (FNS) in unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures. METHODS: Eighteen synthetic femoral models were implanted with one of three fixation devices: FNS, FNAS I, or FNAS II. An unstable Pauwels III (OTA/AO 31-B2.3) femoral neck fracture was simulated using a custom-made needle and osteotomy guide. Torsion and axial compression loading tests were conducted, and the torque, torsion angle, load to failure, displacement, and stiffness values were recorded. RESULTS: FNAS II exhibited significantly higher torsional stiffness (0.67 ± 0.10 Nm/°) compared to FNAS I (0.52 ± 0.07 Nm/°, P = 0.01) and FNS (0.54 ± 0.07 Nm/°, P = 0.005). FNS demonstrated significantly greater mean axial stiffness (239.24 ± 11.38 N/mm) than both FNAS I (179.33 ± 31.11 N/mm, P = 0.005) and FNAS II (190.07 ± 34.11 N/mm, P = 0.022). FNAS I (302.37 ± 33.88 N/mm, P = 0.001) and FNAS II (319.59 ± 50.10 N/mm, P < 0.001) showed significantly higher initial axial stiffness compared to FNS (197.08 ± 33.68 N/mm). Both FNAS I and II improved resistance to deforming forces at a load level before approximately 1000 N, which is sufficient to withstand the load from most daily life activities. No significant differences were observed in compression failure load among the groups. The failure patterns at the point of failure included the pull-out of the distal locking screw and reverse oblique intertrochanteric femur fracture for FNS, while for FNAS I and II, the failures were characterized by a cleft on the calcar femorale and a decrease in the load-displacement curve. CONCLUSIONS: In unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures, the FNAS II enhances stability and is easier to manage for reoperation. The results of the current study support the potential of FNAS II as an alternative option for treating unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures in young individuals.

Asunto(s)