RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: F-627 (efbemalenograstim alfa) is a novel long acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) that contains two human G-CSF fused to a human immunoglobulin G2 (hIgG2) -Fc fragment with a peptide linker. This studyevaluated the efficacy and safety of F-627, also known as efbemalenograstim alfa (Ryzneuta®) in reducing neutropenia compared with filgrastim (GRAN®). METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled non-inferiority study. Two hundred thirty nine (239) patients were enrolled in thirteen centers and received the chemotherapy with epirubicin (100 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) on day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of four cycles. Patients were randomized to receive either a single 20 mg subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of F-627 on day 3 of each cycle or daily s.c. injection of filgrastim 5 µg/kg/d starting from day 3 of each cycle. The primary endpoint was the duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in cycle 1. The safety profile was also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean (SD) duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 was 0.68 (1.10) and 0.71 (0.95) days for the F-627 and the filgrastim groups, respectively. The Hodges-Lehmann estimate of the between-group median difference (F-627 vs filgrastim) in the duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in cycle 1 was 0 day and the upper limit of the one-sided 97.5% CI was 0 day, which was within the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1-day. Results for all efficacy endpoints in cycles 2 - 4 were consistent with the results in cycle 1, however a trend towards a lower incidence and a shorter duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia was observed in the F-627 group compared with the filgrastim group. The ANC nadir in the F-627 group was significantly higher than that in the filgrastim group in each cycle. A single fixed dose of F-627 was well tolerated and as safe as standard daily filgrastim. CONCLUSIONS: A single fixed dose of 20 mg of F-627 in each cycle was as safe and effective as a daily dose of filgrastim 5 µg/kg/d in reducing neutropenia and its complications in patients who received four cycles of EC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04174599, on 22/11/2019.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias de la Mama , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos , Neutropenia , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Filgrastim/administración & dosificación , Filgrastim/efectos adversos , Filgrastim/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Epirrubicina/efectos adversos , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Esquema de MedicaciónRESUMEN
This study aimed to estimate the medical costs associated with febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim and evaluate its impact on survival outcomes in daily practice in Japan. In this single-center retrospective study, we obtained data from 296 Japanese patients with breast cancer receiving fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC)-100 chemotherapy; the patients were divided into the pegfilgrastim and non-pegfilgrastim groups. We analyzed the median costs of chemotherapy, drugs for all adverse events (AEs) and FN, and hospitalization due to FN. We also assessed the survival outcomes. The pegfilgrastim group showed a significantly higher median total cost (JPY 872320.0 vs. JPY 466715.0, p<0.001). This difference was associated with the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim. The median costs of the drugs for all AE treatments were JPY 9030.4 and JPY 24690.6, with the non-pegfilgrastim group showing a significantly higher cost (p<0.001). In 11 patients hospitalized for FN management, no significant difference in hospitalization cost was observed between the pegfilgrastim and non-pegfilgrastim groups (JPY 512390.0 vs. JPY 307555.0, p=0.102). No significant difference in the 3-year overall survival was observed between the pegfilgrastim and non-pegfilgrastim groups (79.9% vs. 88.3%, p=0.672). In this study, although the total medical cost in daily practice increased because of primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim, the 3-year overall survival was not impacted by the use of pegfilgrastim. Our study data suggested that the primary prophylaxis pegfilgrastim should be used during FEC-100 chemotherapy based on the patient-related FN risk factors, instead of routine use.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias de la Mama , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia , Filgrastim , Polietilenglicoles , Humanos , Filgrastim/economía , Filgrastim/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Polietilenglicoles/economía , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Japón/epidemiología , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Anciano , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/etiología , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/prevención & control , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/economía , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/economía , Epirrubicina/efectos adversos , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Hospitalización/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Atención Perioperativa/economía , Neutropenia Febril/prevención & control , Neutropenia Febril/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
The G-Lasta BodyPod(BodyPod), a newly developed on-body injector that automatically injects pegfilgrastim(Peg-G), has been approved for clinical use in Japan. However, its precise operation is yet to be established. Exploring accumulated literature, we reviewed the efficacy and safety of the Peg-G on-body injector used in other countries and determined its eligibility criteria, operating procedures, and troubleshooting guideline. Overseas, the Peg-G on-body injectors were utilized in relatively young patients, approximately 50 years of age. The incidence of on-body injector failure was low(0.1-4.9%)and comprised injection failure, drug leakage, and dropout. We defined eligible patients as those capable of self-management (handling the BodyPod and understanding troubleshooting). For convenience of patients, the BodyPod was applied to them in the outpatient chemotherapy center by nurses with expertise in the application technique. We categorized BodyPod- related issues as(1)allergic symptoms after application and Peg-G injection,( 2)malfunction or failure before initiating the Peg-G injection, or(3)malfunction or failure after initiating the Peg-G injection. In conclusion, a careful understanding of the handling and malfunction of the BodyPod is essential prior to application in clinical settings, along with patient indications and troubleshooting guidelines appropriate for each hospital.
Asunto(s)
Polietilenglicoles , Humanos , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Filgrastim/administración & dosificación , Inyecciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Polatuzumab vedotin(Pola)combination therapy is used for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL)treatment. In clinical trials, more than 90% of the patients have received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor(G-CSF)as primary prophylaxis. However, reports investigating the benefit of prophylactic administration are lacking. In this study, we addressed the incidence of febrile neutropenia(FN)with and without primary prophylaxis with G-CSF combined with Pola therapy. We observed that the incidence of FN with Pola-BR therapy was 0% and 9.5% with and without G-CSF, respectively. The incidence of FN with Pola-R-CHP tended to be higher: 0% and 31.2% with and without G-CSF, respectively. The duration of hospitalization significantly decreased in the Pola-BR group with G-CSF(11 days vs. 18 days in the group without G-CSF), suggesting that prophylaxis might contribute to this reduction. Although not statistically significant, prophylactic G-CSF administration tended to reduce the incidence of Grade 3 or higher leukopenia and neutropenia, suggesting that primary prophylactic G-CSF administration in Pola combination therapy could contribute to reduced hematologic toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Filgrastim , Polietilenglicoles , Humanos , Filgrastim/administración & dosificación , Filgrastim/uso terapéutico , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , InmunoconjugadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An increasing body of research implicates inflammatory processes, including alterations in the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), in the pathophysiology of psychiatric illness. The deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii) is commonly studied for its naturalistic expression of compulsive-like behaviour. Towards future efforts to gain an understanding of how innate and adaptive immune processes might be involved in this model, we aimed to study the effects of pegfilgrastim, a pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (g-CSF) analogue, on the NLR of both male and female deer mice. METHODS: Briefly, 54 deer mice (equally distributed between sexes) were exposed to a single injection with either control or pegfilgrastim (0.1 or 1 mg/kg) (n = 18 per group). Six mice of each group (three per sex) were euthanized on days two, four and seven post-administration, their blood collected and the NLR calculated. Data were analysed by means of ordinary three-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post-hoc testing. RESULTS: Irrespective of dose, pegfilgrastim resulted in higher NLR values in mice of both sexes at days four and seven of testing. However, female mice exposed to the higher dose, presented with significantly higher NLR values irrespective of time, compared to male mice exposed to the same. CONCLUSION: The data generated from this work highlight important dose- and sex-specific aspects of pegfilgrastim with female mice showing heighted elevation of the NLR in response to high-dose pegfilgrastim administration only. Since the innate immune components of male and female deer mice is differentially sensitive to g-CSF stimulation, our results provide a useful basis for further study of sex-specific immunological processes in deer mice.
Asunto(s)
Filgrastim , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos , Neutrófilos , Peromyscus , Polietilenglicoles , Proteínas Recombinantes , Animales , Femenino , Masculino , Polietilenglicoles/farmacología , Neutrófilos/efectos de los fármacos , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Peromyscus/inmunología , Filgrastim/farmacología , Recuento de Leucocitos , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The chemotherapy regimens recommended for both rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and Ewing sarcoma (ES) patients are myelosuppressive and can reduce the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and subsequently increase the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). However, only a few studies have focused on the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) drugs in pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS and ES. Our objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim, a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim, in prophylaxis of FN for pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES. METHODS: In this single-arm, single-center, prospective study, pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES were enrolled to receive either VAC (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, dactinomycin) regimen or VDC (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin) regimen in a 3-week cycle, followed by treatment with mecapegfilgrastim (100 µg/kg, maximum 6 mg) given at 24 h after completing chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of FN. Secondary endpoints included the incidence rate of grade 4 neutropenia, duration of ANC ≤ 0.5 × 109/L, incidence rate of chemotherapy delay or reduction, use of antibiotics, and safety profile. RESULTS: In total, 2 of the 30 (6.7%, 95% CI: 0.82-22.07) patients experienced FN after the first cycle of chemotherapy. Eight (26.7%, 95% CI: 12.28-45.89) patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia after receiving prophylactic mecapegfilgrastim. Eight patients experienced ANC ≤ 0.5 × 109/L with a median duration of 4.5 days; among them, 6 patients reached the lowest point of their ANC level on day 7, and 5 of them recovered by day 10. No dose reductions, delays, or discontinuation of chemotherapy was reported. Twenty-one (70.0%) patients received antibiotics during the treatment period. No patient experienced FN in the 0-5 years and the 13-18 years groups, and 2 patients experienced FN in the 6-12 years group. Two patients, 6 patients, and no patient experienced grade 4 neutropenia in the 0-5 years, 6-12 years, and 13-18 years groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Mecapegfilgrastim showed acceptable efficacy and safety profile in pediatric and adolescent patients with RMS or ES. Further randomized studies with large sample size are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered at Chictr.org.cn (No.ChiCTR1900022249). Registered on March 31, 2019.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neutropenia Febril , Filgrastim , Rabdomiosarcoma , Sarcoma de Ewing , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Sarcoma de Ewing/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Preescolar , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Rabdomiosarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia Febril/prevención & control , Neutropenia Febril/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia Febril/etiología , Filgrastim/uso terapéutico , Filgrastim/administración & dosificación , Filgrastim/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Dactinomicina/administración & dosificación , Dactinomicina/efectos adversos , Dactinomicina/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , LactanteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pegfilgrastim-cbqv/CHS-1701 (UDENYCA®) (hereafter referred to as pegfilgrastim-cbqv) was approved in 2018 by the US Food and Drug Administration as a biosimilar for pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®) (hereafter referred to as pegfilgrastim). Both pegfilgrastim-cbqv and pegfilgrastim are conjugates of recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (r-metHuG-CSF) with a 20 kDa polyethylene glycol (PEG) indicated to decrease the incidence of infection, as manifested by febrile neutropenia, in patients receiving myelosuppressive anticancer drugs. The demonstration of analytical similarity for PEG-protein conjugates presents unique challenges since both the protein and PEG attributes must be characterized. OBJECTIVE: The current study demonstrates the analytical similarity of pegfilgrastim-cbqv and the reference product, pegfilgrastim. In addition to the physicochemical and functional characterization of the protein, the study assessed attributes specific to PEGylation including PEG size and polydispersity, site of attachment, linker composition, and PEGylation process-related variants. METHODS: The structural, functional, and stability attributes of pegfilgrastim-cbqv and pegfilgrastim were compared using state-of-the-art analytical methods. For the protein, the primary structure, disulfide structure, and secondary and tertiary structures were assessed using traditional protein characterization techniques such as mass spectrometry (MS), circular dichroism (CD), intrinsic fluorescence, and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), as well as more advanced techniques such as two-dimensional (2D) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and hydrogen deuterium exchange (HDX). For the PEG moiety, the site of attachment, occupancy, linker composition, size and polydispersity were compared using mass spectrometry (both intact and after endoprotease digestion), multiangle light scattering detection (MALS), and Edman degradation. Purity assessments included the assessment of both protein variants and PEGylation variants using chromatographic and electrophoretic analytical separation techniques. The functional similarity between pegfilgrastim-cbqv and pegfilgrastim was compared using both a cell-based bioassay and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). The degradation rates and stability profiles were compared under accelerated and stressed conditions. RESULTS: Biosimilarity was demonstrated by a thorough assessment of physiochemical and functional attributes, as well as comparative stability, of pegfilgrastim-cbqv relative to pegfilgrastim. These studies demonstrated identical primary structure and disulfide structure, highly similar secondary and tertiary structure, as well as functional similarity. The impurity profile of pegfilgrastim-cbqv was comparable to that of pegfilgrastim with only minor differences in PEGylation variants and a slight offset in the PEG molar mass. These differences were not clinically relevant. The degradation profiles were qualitatively and quantitatively similar under accelerated and stress conditions. CONCLUSION: The structural, functional, and stability data demonstrate that pegfilgrastim-cbqv is highly similar to the reference product, pegfilgrastim.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Filgrastim , Polietilenglicoles , Filgrastim/química , Polietilenglicoles/química , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/química , Humanos , Proteínas Recombinantes/químicaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Myelosuppression, a challenge in cancer treatment, often results in severe complications. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, particularly pegfilgrastim, mitigate chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. This narrative review evaluates the role of on-body injector (OBI) devices for pegfilgrastim administration. A comprehensive search strategy of PubMed and AI-powered intuitive search tools, complemented by authors' contributions, yielded a body of papers presenting evidence on OBI devices, their effectiveness and safety, the benefits and challenges of OBI versus pre-filled syringe administration, patient preferences for pegfilgrastim administration, and economic considerations. DISCUSSION: OBI devices prove effective and safe, with advantages such as reduced clinic visits and enhanced adherence. Studies highlight cost-efficiency and expanded access, emphasizing the socioeconomic context. Patient and provider preferences underscore the potential of OBI devices in cancer care, with implications for healthcare resource utilization and pharmacoeconomics. CONCLUSION: The value proposition of OBI devices lies in improving patient outcomes, convenience, resource optimization, and enhancing the overall cancer care experience. As biosimilar OBIs enter the market, they may offer cost savings, further influencing their adoption and their positioning as a cost-efficient alternative in cancer care. Ongoing research and technological advancements are expected to contribute to the broader acceptance of OBI devices in cancer care delivery.
Asunto(s)
Filgrastim , Neutropenia , Polietilenglicoles , Humanos , Filgrastim/uso terapéutico , Filgrastim/administración & dosificación , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nivestym, a biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to the originator filgrastim (Neupogen), is now being used for the mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We aim to compare the efficacy of Nivestym and Neupogen for PBSC mobilization in healthy allogeneic donors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study including 541 adult allo-HSCT donors receiving Nivestym (January 2013-July 2020), or Neupogen (July 2020-June 2023) for donor PBSC mobilization. Bivariate analysis was conducted using SPSS version 28. Statistical significance was determined at a p-value <.05. RESULTS: Our study included 541 allo-HSCT donors who received Neupogen (n = 345, 64%) or Nivestym (n = 196, 36%) for PBSC mobilization. The median age was 47 years (range 17-76). The median donor weight was 86 kg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87-91). Donors receiving Neupogen had similar pre-G-CSF white blood cell count, CD34+ percentages, and circulating CD34+ count compared with donors receiving Nivestym. The Neupogen group had similar median PBSC product total neutrophil count, CD34+ percentage, absolute CD34+ count, and infused CD34+ dose compared with the Nivestym group. For donors aged 35 years or younger, the median CD34+ dose was higher in donors who received Neupogen compared with Nivestym (6.9 vs. 6.3 million cells/kg, p = .044). CONCLUSIONS: Nivestym demonstrated similar efficacy for PBSC mobilization compared with Neupogen among allo-HSCT donors. In donors aged 35 years or younger, a slightly lower PBSC product CD34+ count was noted with Nivestym compared with Neupogen.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Filgrastim , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Células Madre de Sangre Periférica , Humanos , Filgrastim/uso terapéutico , Filgrastim/administración & dosificación , Filgrastim/farmacología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Células Madre de Sangre Periférica/efectos de los fármacos , Trasplante Homólogo , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre PeriféricaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine the cost-effectiveness of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for primary or secondary prophylaxis in patients with breast cancer from the perspective of Taiwan's National Health Insurance Administration. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to simulate the events that may occur during and after a high-risk chemotherapy treatment. Various G-CSF prophylaxis strategies and medications were compared in the model. Effectiveness data were derived from the literature and an analysis of the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Cost data were obtained from a published NHIRD study, and health utility values were also obtained from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of the cost-effectiveness results. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of NT$269,683 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared to primary prophylaxis with lenograstim. The ICER for primary prophylaxis with lenograstim versus no G-CSF prophylaxis was NT$61,995 per QALY gained. The results were most sensitive to variations in relative risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) for pegfilgrastim versus no G-CSF prophylaxis. Furthermore, in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of one times Taiwan's gross domestic product per capita, the probability of being cost-effective was 88.1% for primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that primary prophylaxis with either short- or long-acting G-CSF could be considered cost-effective for FN prevention in breast cancer patients receiving high-risk regimens.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Taiwán/epidemiología , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/economía , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/prevención & control , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/economía , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/etiología , Cadenas de Markov , Filgrastim/uso terapéutico , Filgrastim/economía , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , PolietilenglicolesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the entry of biosimilars on the pricing of eight biologic products in 57 countries and regions. METHODS: We utilized an interrupted time series design and IQVIA MIDAS® data to analyze the annual sales data of eight biologic products (adalimumab, bevacizumab, epoetin, etanercept, filgrastim, infliximab, pegfilgrastim, and trastuzumab) across 57 countries and regions from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2019. We examined the immediate and long-term changes in biologics ex-manufacturer pricing following the entry of biosimilars to the market. RESULTS: Following the entry of biosimilars, the average price per dose of biologic product was immediately reduced by $438 for trastuzumab, $112 for infliximab, and $110 for bevacizumab. The persistent effect of biosimilars' market entry led to further reductions in price per dose every year: by $49 for adalimumab, $290 for filgrastim, $21 for infliximab, and $189 for trastuzumab. Similarly, we analyzed the impact of biosimilars on four biologics' prices in the US, where the prices of three biologics significantly decreased every year, with filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and infliximab decreasing by $955, $753, and $104, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of biosimilars has significantly reduced the prices of biologics both globally and in the US. These findings not only demonstrate the economic benefits of increasing biosimilar utilization, but also emphasize the importance of biosimilars in controlling healthcare costs. Policies should aim to expand the availability of biosimilars to counteract the exponential growth of medical spending caused by the use of biologics.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Infliximab , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/economía , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infliximab/economía , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Filgrastim/economía , Filgrastim/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/economía , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Costos de los Medicamentos , Adalimumab/economía , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/economía , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Trastuzumab/economía , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico , Costos y Análisis de Costo , PolietilenglicolesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Successful engraftment in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation necessitates the collection of an adequate dose of CD34+ cells. Thus, the precise estimation of CD34+ cells harvested via apheresis is critical. Current CD34+ cell yield prediction models have limited reproducibility. This study aims to develop a more reliable and universally applicable model by utilizing a large dataset, enhancing yield predictions, optimizing the collection process, and improving clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A secondary analysis was conducted using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, involving data from over 17 000 healthy donors who underwent filgrastim-mobilized hematopoietic progenitor cell apheresis. Linear regression, gradient boosting regressor, and logistic regression classification models were employed to predict CD34+ cell yield. RESULTS: Key predictors identified include pre-apheresis CD34+ cell count, weight, age, sex, and blood volume processed. The linear regression model achieved a coefficient of determination (R2) value of 0.66 and a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.81. The gradient boosting regressor model demonstrated marginally improved results with an R2 value of 0.67 and an r value of 0.82. The logistic regression classification model achieved a predictive accuracy of 96% at the 200 × 106 CD34+ cell count threshold. At thresholds of 400, 600, 800, and 1000 × 106 CD34+ cell count, the accuracies were 88%, 83%, 83%, and 88%, respectively. The model demonstrated a high area under the receiver operator curve scores ranging from 0.90 to 0.93. CONCLUSION: This study introduces advanced predictive models for estimating CD34+ cell yield, with the logistic regression classification model demonstrating remarkable accuracy and practical utility.
Asunto(s)
Antígenos CD34 , Humanos , Antígenos CD34/análisis , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/citología , Eliminación de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Modelos Lineales , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Filgrastim/farmacología , Modelos LogísticosRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a life-saving procedure used to treat a variety of devastating diseases. It requires hematopoietic stem cells collected via filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) or bone marrow (BM) harvest from volunteer unrelated donors (URDs). There is a paucity of safety data regarding donors' long-term adverse events. This prospective, observational study combined PBSC donors enrolled in the NMDP Investigational New Drug trial and BM donors between 1 July 1999 and 30 September 2015. The primary objective was to describe the long-term incidence of myeloid malignancies. The secondary objectives included describing the long-term incidence of lymphoid malignancies, nonhematologic malignancies, autoimmune disorders, and thrombotic events. A total of 21 643 donors (14 530 PBSCs and 7123 BM) were included. The incidence rate of myeloid disorders per 100 000 person-years in donors of PBSCs was 2.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-7.84) and in donors of BM, it was 4.13 (95% CI, 1.33-12.8). The incidence rate ratio of PBSCs/BM donors was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.12-3.03; P = .55). The incidence of other malignancies, autoimmunity, and thrombosis did not differ between the donor types. This comprehensive study of the long-term effects of filgrastim in URDs of PBSCs provides strong evidence that donors who receive filgrastim are not at an increased risk of these events compared with BM donors. It also provides reassurance to current donors undergoing stem cell mobilization as well as individuals considering joining stem cell registries, such as NMDP.
Asunto(s)
Filgrastim , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética , Humanos , Filgrastim/uso terapéutico , Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Células Madre de Sangre Periférica , Donante no Emparentado , Estudios Prospectivos , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven , Incidencia , Adolescente , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Only one report on the successful use of filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in cats for severe neutropenia following azathioprine toxicity exists. Here, we report on a case in which a cat was prescribed methimazole but the medication was filled incorrectly with azathioprine tablets and the prescription label indicated a methimazole dosing regimen that was administered for three days before recognition of the error. On presentation, the cat's physical examinations were consistent with previous examinations before ingestion of azathioprine. A complete blood cell count revealed neutropenia and leukopenia. The cat later developed hyporexia, dehydration, and vomiting. Treatment included antinausea and appetite stimulant medications, filgrastim, and antibiotics. Filgrastim given as subcutaneous injections over the course of treatment increased neutrophil cell counts after suppression. The cat made a full recovery after responding to the treatment protocol. Based on the perceived response to filgrastim in this single feline case report, its use can be considered for the treatment of azathioprine-induced neutropenia in cats.
Asunto(s)
Azatioprina , Enfermedades de los Gatos , Filgrastim , Neutropenia , Animales , Gatos , Filgrastim/uso terapéutico , Filgrastim/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de los Gatos/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Gatos/inducido químicamente , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Azatioprina/efectos adversos , Neutropenia/veterinaria , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Errores de Medicación/veterinaria , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Masculino , Metimazol/efectos adversos , Metimazol/uso terapéutico , FemeninoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To study the effects of delaying pegfilgrastim administration following high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation in AML patients on time to neutrophil count recovery, infectious complications, and survival. METHODS: Single-center retrospective chart review of 55 patients receiving pegfilgrastim as early administration (within 72 h) or delayed administration (after 72 h) of HiDAC. RESULTS: The difference in neutrophil recovery time was similar between the early and delayed groups (18 days versus 19 days, p < 0.28). Infections were seen in four patients in the early administration group following chemotherapy compared to none in the delayed group (p = 0.04). Febrile neutropenia rates were also decreased in the delayed administration group (23.1% versus 10.3%, p = 0.28) as well as a trend towards longer median survival (16 months versus 19 months, p = 0.69) and overall survival (21 months versus 31 months, p = 0.47). CONCLUSION: A difference in time to neutrophil recovery was not observed between the early and delayed administration groups yet decreased infectious complications may support the delayed administration of pegfilgrastim in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Citarabina , Filgrastim , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Polietilenglicoles , Humanos , Citarabina/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia de Consolidación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The timing of prophylactic pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration during cancer chemotherapy varies, with Day 2 and Days 3-5 being the most common schedules. Optimal timing remains uncertain, affecting efficacy and adverse events. This systematic review sought to evaluate the available evidence on the timing of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF administration. METHODS: Based on the Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development, we searched the PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and Cochrane Library databases for literature published from January 1990 to December 2019. The inclusion criteria included studies among the adult population using pegfilgrastim. The search strategy focused on timing-related keywords. Two reviewers independently extracted and assessed the data. RESULTS: Among 300 initial search results, only four articles met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis for febrile neutropenia incidence suggested a potential higher incidence when pegylated G-CSF was administered on Days 3-5 than on Day 2 (odds ratio: 1.27, 95% CI 0.66-2.46, p = 0.47), with a moderate certainty of evidence. No significant difference in overall survival or mortality due to infections was observed. The trend of severe adverse events was lower on Days 3-5, without statistical significance (odds ratio: 0.72, 95% CI 0.14-3.67, p = 0.69) and with a moderate certainty of evidence. Data on pain were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Both Day 2 and Days 3-5 were weakly recommended for pegylated G-CSF administration post-chemotherapy in patients with cancer. The limited evidence highlights the need for further research to refine recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Esquema de Medicación , Filgrastim/uso terapéutico , Filgrastim/administración & dosificación , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/uso terapéutico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Polietilenglicoles , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Proteínas Recombinantes , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection via apheresis requires the administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) to stem cell donors. Several reports have shown that filgrastim administration and apheresis procedure induce a hypercoagulable state across PBSC collection, which might predispose certain donors to thrombotic complications. METHODS: We evaluated the hemostatic functions of healthy allogeneic stem cell donors by rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Blood samples from healthy donors (n = 30) were collected at defined time points: before filgrastim (baseline), on the day of apheresis before and after the procedure, and 1 week after apheresis. RESULTS: The results indicated that hemostatic changes are temporary since all parameters in both EXTEM and INTEM assays are restored to their initial values 1 week after the apheresis. CONCLUSION: We concluded that stem cell apheresis does not induce a hypercoagulable state in healthy donors. This is the first study evaluating the hemostatic functions of stem cell donors by ROTEM.
Asunto(s)
Eliminación de Componentes Sanguíneos , Tromboelastografía , Humanos , Tromboelastografía/métodos , Eliminación de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Filgrastim/farmacología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemostasis/fisiología , Trasplante Homólogo/métodos , Donantes de Tejidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Aortitis is a rare adverse event of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment. Several previous studies have described recurrent aortitis caused by re-administration of the same G-CSF. However, no previous studies have examined the safety of switching between short-acting G-CSFs in patients who develop aortitis. We report the case of a 55-year-old man with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, who developed G-CSF-associated aortitis. The aortitis was triggered by filgrastim and recurred after treatment with lenograstim. The patient possessed human leukocyte antigen B52, which has been implicated in Takayasu arteritis. In addition, a drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test for lenograstim performed upon detection of recurrent G-CSF-associated aortitis produced a positive result. Our case suggests that switching from one short-acting G-CSF to another does not prevent recurrence of G-CSF-associated aortitis. Although the etiology of G-CSF-associated aortitis has not been fully elucidated, our case also suggests that some patients may be genetically predisposed to aortitis.
Asunto(s)
Aortitis , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos , Antígeno HLA-B52 , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Humanos , Masculino , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/efectos adversos , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Aortitis/inducido químicamente , Aortitis/etiología , Antígeno HLA-B52/efectos adversos , Filgrastim/efectos adversos , Filgrastim/administración & dosificación , Lenograstim , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
In the development of biosimilar products to Neulasta, it is essential to determine the intact molecular mass and confirm precise PEGylation sites. In this study, we applied a combination of techniques, including post-column addition of triethylamine in reversed-phase liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (RPLC-MS) to determine the intact molecular mass, and in-source fragmentation (ISF) and higher-energy collision dissociation-tandem mass spectrometry (HCD-MS/MS) to identify the PEGylation site. Our results show that both the pegfilgrastim biosimilar candidate and Neulasta lots are mono-PEGylated at the N-terminal end. Furthermore, we show that the combined ISF and HCD-MS/MS method can be used for identifying the PEGylation sites in the diPEGylated variant of pegfilgrastim. The diPEGylated variant has modification sites at the N-terminal end and a lysine at position 35 in the protein sequence.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/química , Filgrastim , Polietilenglicoles/químicaRESUMEN
Febrile neutropenia(FN)causes a prolonged treatment schedule and decreased relative dose intensity(RDI)during cancer chemotherapy, which adversely affects prognosis. In recent years, dose-dense(dd)chemotherapy has been used as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with breast cancer based on the results of improved disease-free survival according to meta-analysis data. Regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer, taxanes and trastuzumab with the addition of pertuzumab have shown higher pathological complete response rates and elevated incidences of FN. One hundred seventy-six patients received pegfilgrastim(PEG)prophylaxis between January 2011 and January 2023. Until 2019, the median day of PEG prophylaxis was day 4 from chemotherapy completion(days 2- 3, 14 cases; day 4, 41 cases; and day 5, 8 cases)with antibiotic prophylaxis in 58 patients(92%). FN was observed in 19 cases(30%). The RDIs of TC and FEC were 96.8% and 96.0%, respectively. Meanwhile, the median day of PEG prophylaxis after 2020 was day 2 from chemotherapy completion(days 2-3, 108 cases; day 4, 4 cases; and day 5, 1 case)without antibiotic prophylaxis. FN was not observed in any of the cases. The RDI of all regimens was 99.7%. Although there were some differences in chemotherapy regimens, an earlier timing of PEG prophylaxis(especially 24-48 hours from chemotherapy completion)has been shown to reduce the incidence of FN and increase the RDI.