RESUMEN
Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor is fundamental in all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to prevent coronary thrombosis. In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), an oral anticoagulant gives protection against ischemic stroke or systemic embolism. AF-PCI patients are at high bleeding risk and decision-making regarding the optimal antithrombotic therapy remains challenging. Dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) has been shown to reduce bleeding events but at the cost of a higher risk of stent thrombosis. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal duration of triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) or DAT and the role of more potent antiplatelet drugs.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Trombosis Coronaria/prevención & controlRESUMEN
This report presents the latest statistics on the stroke population in South Korea, sourced from the Clinical Research Collaborations for Stroke in Korea-National Institute for Health (CRCS-K-NIH), a comprehensive, nationwide, multicenter stroke registry. The Korean cohort, unlike western populations, shows a male-to-female ratio of 1.5, attributed to lower risk factors in Korean women. The average ages for men and women are 67 and 73 years, respectively. Hypertension is the most common risk factor (67%), consistent with global trends, but there is a higher prevalence of diabetes (35%) and smoking (21%). The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (19%) is lower than in western populations, suggesting effective prevention strategies in the general population. A high incidence of large artery atherosclerosis (38%) is observed, likely due to prevalent intracranial arterial disease in East Asians and advanced imaging techniques. There has been a decrease in intravenous thrombolysis rates, from 12% in 2017-2019 to 10% in 2021, with no improvements in door-to-needle and door-to-puncture times, worsened by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. While the use of aspirin plus clopidogrel for non-cardioembolic stroke and direct oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation is well-established, the application of direct oral anticoagulants for non-atrial fibrillation cardioembolic strokes in the acute phase requires further research. The incidence of early neurological deterioration (13%) and the cumulative incidence of recurrent stroke at 3 months (3%) align with global figures. Favorable outcomes at 3 months (63%) are comparable internationally, yet the lack of improvement in dependency at 3 months highlights the need for advancements in acute stroke care.
Asunto(s)
Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Femenino , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Masculino , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , COVID-19/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , SARS-CoV-2 , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/complicaciones , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have complex dosing regimens and are often incorrectly prescribed. We evaluated a nationwide DOAC population management dashboard rollout whose purpose includes pharmacist review and correction of off-label dosing prescriptions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from Veterans Health Affairs, we identified all patients prescribed DOACs for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism between August 2015 and December 2019. Sites were grouped on the basis of the timing of moderate-high usage of the DOAC population management tool dashboard. Effectiveness was defined as the monthly rate of off-label DOAC prescribing and the rate of clinical adverse events (bleeding, composite of stroke or venous thromboembolism). Implementation was evaluated as the percentage of off-label DOAC prescriptions changed within 7 days. Among the 128 652 patients receiving DOAC therapy at 123 centers, between 6.9% and 8.6% had off-label DOAC prescriptions. Adoption of the DOAC population management tool dashboard before July 2018 was associated with a decline in off-label dosing prescriptions (8.7%-7.6%). Only 1 group demonstrated a significant reduction in monthly rates of bleeding following implementation. All sites experienced a reduction in the composite of venous thromboembolism or stroke following dashboard adoption. There was no difference in the implementation outcome of DOAC prescription change within 7 days in any of the adoption groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early adoption of the DOAC population management tool dashboard was associated with decreased rates of off-label DOAC dosing prescription and reduced bleeding. Following adoption of the DOAC population management tool dashboard, all sites experienced reductions in venous thromboembolism and stroke events.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado , Farmacéuticos , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Estados Unidos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Department of Veterans AffairsRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation are frequently nonadherent to oral anticoagulants (OACs) prescribed for stroke and systemic embolism (SSE) prevention. We quantified the relationship between OAC adherence and atrial fibrillation clinical outcomes using methods not previously applied to this problem. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective observational cohort study of incident cases of atrial fibrillation from population-based administrative data over 23 years. The exposure of interest was proportion of days covered during 90 days before an event or end of follow-up. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate time to first SSE and the composite of SSE, transient ischemic attack, or death and several secondary outcomes. A total of 44 172 patients were included with median follow-up of 6.7 years. For direct OACs (DOACs), each 10% decrease in adherence was associated with a 14% increased hazard of SSE and 5% increased hazard of SSE, transient ischemic attack, or death. For vitamin K antagonist (VKA) the corresponding increase in SSE hazard was 3%. Receiving DOAC or VKA was associated with primary outcome hazard reduction across most the proportion of days covered spectrum. Differences between VKA and DOAC were statistically significant for all efficacy outcomes and at most adherence levels. CONCLUSIONS: Even small reductions in OAC adherence in patients with atrial fibrillation were associated with significant increases in risk of stroke, with greater magnitudes for DOAC than VKA. DOAC recipients may be more vulnerable than VKA recipients to increased risk of stroke and death even with small reductions in adherence. The worsening efficacy outcomes associated with decreasing adherence occurred without the benefit of major bleeding reduction.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Oral , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Embolia/prevención & control , Embolia/epidemiología , Embolia/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Objective: To evaluate the impact of adverse health conditions, including multimorbidity, frailty, malnutrition, cognitive impairment, and polypharmacy, on clinical outcomes in older people with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients and Methods: This prospective cohort study focused on patients aged 65 years and older with AF. They were admitted to the hospital between September 2018 and April 2019 and followed up for 1 year. We evaluated these participants for adverse health conditions including multimorbidity, frailty, malnutrition, cognitive impairment, and polypharmacy. The primary clinical outcome measured was a combination of all-cause mortality or rehospitalization. Results: 197 older patients (≥65 years) with AF (mean age, 77.5±7.1 years; 57.4% men) were enrolled. During 1-year follow-up, Primary endpoint events (all-cause mortality or rehospitalization) occurred in 82 patients (41.6%). Compared with the non-event group, the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was higher (2.5±1.9 vs 1.7±1.3, p=0.004), more heart failure (32.9% vs 17.4%, p=0.01) and chronic kidney disease (17.1% vs 7.0%, p=0.03), with lower systolic blood pressure (125.3±18.3 mmHg vs 132±17.9 mmHg, p=0.005) in the event group. On multivariate Cox regression showed that the CCI was associated with a higher odds ratio of the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.02-1.56, p=0.03). Other adverse health conditions showed no significant association with the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization. Conclusion: Among adverse health conditions in older people with AF, multimorbidity appears to be a significant determinant of adverse clinical outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: ChiCTR1800017204; date of registration: 07/18/2018.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Desnutrición , Multimorbilidad , Readmisión del Paciente , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Polifarmacia , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos de Riesgos ProporcionalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the application value and safety of Warfarin, Rivaroxaban, and Dabigatran in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A total of 180 elderly patients with atrial fibrillation admitted to our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to their anticoagulant treatment regimen, patients were divided into three groups: Warfarin (57 cases), Rivaroxaban (61 cases), and Dabigatran (62 cases). General demographic information was collected, and coagulation function indicators-including fibrinogen (FIB), thrombin time (PT), activated partial thrombin time (APTT), and D-dimer (D-D)-as well as liver function indexes-including total bilirubin (TbiL), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine transferase (ALT)-were compared before and after 4 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics such as gender, age, body mass index, or disease course among the three groups. The total effective rate in the Warfarin group (84.21%) was significantly lower than in the Rivaroxaban (98.36%) and Dabigatran (96.77%) groups (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran groups (p > 0.05). Additionally, no significant differences were found in the effects of the three drugs on coagulation function, liver function, or the incidence of bleeding (p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: Warfarin, Rivaroxaban, and Dabigatran can effectively prevent thrombosis in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, with Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran showing superior effectiveness. All three drugs demonstrated similar low rates of bleeding events and had no significant impact on coagulation and liver function.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Coagulación Sanguínea , Dabigatrán , Rivaroxabán , Warfarina , Humanos , Dabigatrán/efectos adversos , Dabigatrán/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antitrombinas/efectos adversos , Antitrombinas/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents complex management scenarios, particularly in patients requiring anticoagulation for concurrent conditions such as venous thromboembolism (VTE) or atrial fibrillation (AF). A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies assessing the effects of anticoagulation therapy on outcomes such as re-hemorrhage, hematoma expansion, thrombotic events, and hemorrhagic events in TBI patients with subdural hematomas (SDH). This systematic review critically addresses two key questions: the optimal timing for initiating anticoagulation therapy and the differential impact of this timing based on the type of intracranial bleed, with a specific focus on subdural hematomas (SDH) compared to other types. Initially screening 508 articles, 7 studies met inclusion criteria, which varied in design and quality, precluding meta-analysis. The review highlights a significant knowledge gap, underscoring the lack of consensus on when to initiate anticoagulation therapy in TBI patients, exacerbated by the need for anticoagulation in the presence of VTE or AF. Early anticoagulation, particularly in patients with SDH, may elevate the risk of re-hemorrhage, posing a clinical dilemma. Evidence on whether the type of intracranial hemorrhage influences outcomes with early anticoagulation remains inconclusive, indicating a need for further research to tailor management strategies effectively. This review underscores the scarcity of high-quality evidence regarding anticoagulation therapy in TBI patients with concurrent conditions, emphasizing the necessity for well-designed prospective studies to elucidate optimal management strategies for this complex patient population.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Humanos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Estudios Observacionales como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) is the cornerstone treatment for preventing venous thromboembolism and stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Despite its significance, challenges in adherence and persistence to OAC regimens have been reported, leading to severe health complications. Central to addressing these challenges is the concept of self-efficacy (SE) in medication management. Currently, there is a noticeable gap in available tools specifically designed to measure SE in OAC self-care management, while such tools are crucial for enhancing patient adherence and overall treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop and validate a novel scale aimed to measure self-care self-efficacy (SCSE) in patients with NVAF under OAC, which is the patients' Self-Care Self-Efficacy Index in Oral Anticoagulation Therapy Management (SCSE-OAC), for English- and Italian-speaking populations. We also seek to assess patients' SE in managing their OAC treatment effectively and to explore the relationship between SE levels and sociodemographic and clinical variables. METHODS: Using a multiphase, mixed methods observational study design, we first conceptualize the SCSE-OAC through literature reviews, patient focus groups, and expert consensus. The scale's content validity will be evaluated through patient and expert reviews, while its construct validity is assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, ensuring cross-cultural applicability. Criterion validity will be examined through correlations with clinical outcomes. Reliability will be tested via internal consistency and test-retest reliability measures. The study will involve adult outpatients with NVAF on OAC treatment for a minimum of 3 months, using both e-surveys and paper forms for data collection. RESULTS: It is anticipated that the SCSE-OAC will emerge as a reliable and valid tool for measuring SE in OAC self-care management. It will enable identifying patients at risk of poor adherence due to low SE, facilitating targeted educational interventions. The scale's validation in both English and Italian-speaking populations will underscore its applicability in diverse clinical settings, contributing significantly to personalized patient-centered care in anticoagulation management. CONCLUSIONS: The development and validation of the SCSE-OAC represent a significant advancement in the field of anticoagulation therapy. Validating the index in English- and Italian-speaking populations will enable personalized patient-centered educational interventions, ultimately improving OAC treatment outcomes. The SCSE-OAC's focus on SCSE introduces a novel approach to identifying and addressing individual patient needs, promoting adherence, and ultimately improving health outcomes. Future endeavors will seek to extend the validation of the SCSE-OAC across diverse cultural and linguistic landscapes, broadening its applicability in global clinical and research settings. This scale-up effort is crucial for establishing a universal standard for measuring SCSE in OAC management, empowering clinicians and researchers worldwide to tailor effective and culturally sensitive interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05820854; https://tinyurl.com/2mmypey7. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/51489.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Autocuidado , Autoeficacia , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Femenino , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Psicometría/métodos , Psicometría/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants are the standard of care for stroke prevention in eligible patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter; however, bleeding remains a significant concern, limiting their use. Milvexian is an oral Factor XIa inhibitor that may offer similar anticoagulant efficacy with less bleeding risk. METHODS: LIBREXIA AF (NCT05757869) is a global phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, event-driven trial to compare milvexian with apixaban in participants with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Participants are randomly assigned to milvexian 100 mg or apixaban (5 mg or 2.5 mg per label indication) twice daily. The primary efficacy objective is to evaluate if milvexian is noninferior to apixaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism. The principal safety objective is to evaluate if milvexian is superior to apixaban in reducing the endpoint of International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major bleeding events and the composite endpoint of ISTH major and clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM) bleeding events. In total, 15,500 participants from approximately 1,000 sites in over 30 countries are planned to be enrolled. They will be followed until both 430 primary efficacy outcome events and 530 principal safety events are observed, which is estimated to take approximately 4 years. CONCLUSION: The LIBREXIA AF study will determine the efficacy and safety of the oral Factor XIa inhibitor milvexian compared with apixaban in participants with either atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05757869.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Pirazoles , Piridonas , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Masculino , Femenino , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Aleteo Atrial/complicaciones , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Factor XIa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Short and rare episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) are commonly detected using implanted devices (device-detected AF) in patients with prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulation in patients with prior stroke or TIA and device-detected AF but with no ECG-documented AF is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prespecified analysis of the NOAH-AFNET 6 (Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial High Rate Episodes) trial with post hoc elements assessed the effect of oral anticoagulation in patients with device-detected AF with and without a prior stroke or TIA in the randomized, double-blind, double-dummy NOAH-AFNET 6 trial. Outcomes were stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death (primary outcome) and major bleeding and death (safety outcome). A prior stroke or TIA was found in 253 patients with device-detected AF randomized in the NOAH-AFNET 6 (mean age, 78 years; 36.4% women). There was no treatment interaction with prior stroke or TIA for any of the primary and secondary time-to-event outcomes. In patients with a prior stroke or TIA, 14 out of 122 patients experienced a primary outcome event with anticoagulation (5.7% per patient-year). Without anticoagulation, there were 16 out of 131 patients with an event (6.3% per patient-year). The rate of stroke was lower than expected (anticoagulation: 4 out of 122 [1.6% per patient-year]; no anticoagulation: 6 out of 131 [2.3% per patient-year]). Numerically, there were more major bleeding events with anticoagulation in patients with prior stroke or TIA (8 out of 122 patients) than without anticoagulation (2 out of 131 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation appears to have ambiguous effects in patients with device-detected AF and a prior stroke or TIA in this hypothesis-generating analysis of the NOAH-AFNET 6 in the absence of ECG-documented AF, partially due to a low rate of stroke without anticoagulation.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/prevención & control , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Método Doble Ciego , Administración Oral , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Factores de Tiempo , Marcapaso ArtificialRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite oral anticoagulation, patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remain at risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (SE) events. For patients whose residual risk is sufficiently high, additional therapies might be useful to mitigate stroke risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: Individual patient data from 5 landmark trials testing oral anticoagulation in AF were pooled in A Collaboration Between Multiple Institutions to Better Investigate Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant Use in AF (COMBINE AF). We calculated the rate of ischemic stroke/SE among oral anticoagulation-treated patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score≥2, across strata of CHA2DS2-VASc score, stroke history, and AF type, as either paroxysmal or nonparoxysmal. We included 71 794 patients with AF (median age 72 years, interquartile range, 13 years, 61.3% male) randomized to a direct oral anticoagulant or vitamin K antagonist, and followed for a mean of 2.1 (±0.8) years. The median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4 (interquartile range, 3-5), 18.8% had a prior stroke, and 76.4% had nonparoxysmal AF. The overall rate of stroke/SE was 1.33%/y (95% CI, 1.27-1.39); 1.38%/y (95% CI, 1.31-1.45) for nonparoxysmal AF, and 1.15%/y (95% CI, 1.05-1.27) for paroxysmal AF. The rate of ischemic stroke/SE increased by a rate ratio of 1.36 (95% CI, 1.32-1.41) per 1-point increase in CHA2DS2-VASc, reaching 1.67%/y (95% CI, 1.59-1.75) ≥4 CHA2DS2-VASc points. Patients with both nonparoxysmal AF and CHA2DS2-VASc ≥4 had a stroke/SE rate of 1.75%/y (95% CI, 1.66-1.85). In patients with a prior stroke, the risk was 2.51%/y (95% CI, 2.33-2.71). CONCLUSIONS: AF type, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and stroke history can identify patients with AF, who despite oral anticoagulation have a residual stroke/SE risk of 1.5% to 2.5% per year. Evaluation of additional stroke/SE prevention strategies in high-risk patients is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. When atrial fibrillation is first diagnosed, it tends to be permanent and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to study the management of a first episode of atrial fibrillation in a group of patients in Yaounde, Cameroon. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study with data collected from the Cardiology department of Yaounde Central Hospital and the internal medicine department of Yaounde General Hospital over five years (January 2017 to December 2021), for a duration of 4 months, from February 2022 to May 2022. All patients older than 15 years with a first episode of atrial fibrillation were included, and all patients with incomplete medical records were excluded. The association between different variables was assessed using a χ² test and logistic regression method with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 141 patients recruited, the mean age was 68.5 ± 10.6 years. The sex ratio (M/F) was 0.7. The main associated factors and co-morbidities were hypertension in 70.2% (99) patients, heart failure in 36.9% (52) patients and a sedentary lifestyle in 33.3% (47) patients. The most common anticoagulant treatment was AntiVitamin K, used in 64.5% (91) of patients. Heart rate control was the most commonly used symptom control strategy in 85.1% (120) patients, mainly with beta-blockers in 52.5% (74). We found 1.4% (2) participants who were not treated with antithrombotics as recommended. Treatment of arrhythmia due to co-morbidities was not always recommended. The complication rate was 94.3% (133) patients. Control of the bleeding risk due to antithrombotic therapy and monitoring of anticoagulant therapy were not optimal. The heart rate control strategy had a higher success rate, and the sinus rhythm maintenance rate at one year was 61.7% (37) participants. CONCLUSION: The management of a first episode of atrial fibrillation at Yaoundé's Central and General Hospitals is not always performed according to current recommendations and is far from optimal. However, nearly two out of three patients maintained sinus rhythm for one year.
Asunto(s)
Antiarrítmicos , Fibrilación Atrial , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Camerún/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Antiarrítmicos/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Tiempo , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Salud Urbana , Comorbilidad , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Medición de Riesgo , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendenciasRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Previous studies have found that anxiety disorders may increase the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). More and more studies have shown that α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) are involved in the occurrence and development of cardiovascular diseases. However, the role of AMPARs in AF associated with anxiety disorder remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of AMPARs on AF susceptibility in rats with anxiety disorder and its possible mechanism. The anxiety disorder rat model was established by unpredictable empty bottle stimulation and was treated with AMPARs agonist and antagonist. Our results showed that AMPARs antagonist treatment significantly reduced sympathetic activity, improved heart rate variability, shortened action potential duration, prolonged effective refractory period, reduced AF induction rate, and improved cardiac electrical remodeling and the expression of inflammatory factors. In addition, inhibition of AMPARs reduced the phosphorylation of IκBα and p65. Our experimental results suggest that inhibition of AMPARs can reduce autonomic remodeling, improve atrial electrical remodeling, and suppress myocardial inflammation, which provides a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of AF associated with anxiety disorder.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad , Fibrilación Atrial , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Atrios Cardíacos , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Receptores AMPA , Animales , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/metabolismo , Masculino , Trastornos de Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/metabolismo , Trastornos de Ansiedad/fisiopatología , Atrios Cardíacos/efectos de los fármacos , Atrios Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Atrios Cardíacos/metabolismo , Atrios Cardíacos/patología , Receptores AMPA/metabolismo , Remodelación Atrial/efectos de los fármacos , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Mediadores de Inflamación/metabolismo , Potenciales de Acción/efectos de los fármacos , Fosforilación , Transducción de Señal , Sistema Nervioso Simpático/fisiopatología , Sistema Nervioso Simpático/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema Nervioso Simpático/metabolismo , Factor de Transcripción ReIA/metabolismo , Ratas , Antiinflamatorios/farmacología , Periodo Refractario Electrofisiológico/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidor NF-kappaB alfa/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease have higher risks of bleeding, thromboembolism, and mortality. However, optimal anticoagulant choice in these high-risk patients remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using deidentified electronic health records from the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, adults with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2) initiating warfarin, apixaban, or rivaroxaban between 2011 and 2021 were included. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting, adjusted risks of major bleeding, stroke/systemic embolism, and death were compared among agents. A total of 6794 patients were included (mean age, 78.5 years; mean estimated glomerular filtration rate, 24.7 mL/min per 1.73 m2; 51% women). Apixaban versus warfarin was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (incidence rate, 1.5 versus 2.9 per 100 person-years; subdistribution hazard ratio [sub-HR], 0.53 [95% CI, 0.39-0.70]), and similar risks for stroke/systemic embolism (incidence rate, 1.9 versus 2.4 per 100 person-years; sub-HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.59-1.09]) and death (incidence rate, 4.6 versus 4.5 per 100 person-years; HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.82-1.29]). Rivaroxaban versus warfarin was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (incidence rate, 4.9 versus 2.9 per 100 person-years; sub-HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.10-2.48]), with no difference in risks for stroke/systemic embolism and death. Apixaban versus rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (sub-HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.36-0.78]). CONCLUSIONS: These real-world findings are consistent with potential safety advantages of apixaban over warfarin and rivaroxaban for patients with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease. Further randomized trials comparing individual oral anticoagulants are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Embolia , Hemorragia , Pirazoles , Piridonas , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Rivaroxabán , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Warfarina , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificación , Embolia/prevención & control , Embolia/epidemiología , Embolia/etiología , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Medición de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Incidencia , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Sex differences occur in atrial fibrillation (AF), including age at first manifestation, pathophysiology, treatment allocation, complication rates and quality of life. However, optimal doses of cardiovascular pharmacotherapy used in women with AF with or without heart failure (HF) are unclear. We investigated sex-specific associations of beta-blocker and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor doses with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with AF or AF with concomitant HF. METHODS: We used data from the prospective Basel Atrial Fibrillation and Swiss Atrial Fibrillation cohorts on patients with AF. The outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolisation and HF-related hospitalisation. Predictors of interest were spline (primary analysis) or quartiles (secondary analysis) of beta-blocker or RAS inhibitor dose in per cent of the maximum dose (reference), in interaction with sex. Cox models were adjusted for demographics, comorbidities and comedication. RESULTS: Among 3961 patients (28% women), MACEs occurred in 1113 (28%) patients over a 5-year median follow-up. Distributions of RAS inhibitor and beta-blocker doses were similar in women and men. Cox models revealed no association between beta-blocker dose or RAS inhibitor dose and MACE. In a subgroup of patients with AF and HF, the lowest hazard of MACE was observed in women prescribed 100% of the RAS inhibitor dose. However, there was no association between RAS dose quartiles and MACE. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients with AF, doses of beta-blockers and RAS inhibitors did not differ by sex and were not associated with MACE overall.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta , Fibrilación Atrial , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Suiza/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Seguimiento , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Factores de Tiempo , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a significant global health issue and is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Patients with CKD have an increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become a standard of care for anticoagulation (AC) in patients with AF and VTE, the appropriate use of these agents in comorbid kidney impairment warrants detailed discussion. This scientific narrative review summarizes the effectiveness and safety of apixaban use in patients with renal dysfunction by assessing the current published pharmacokinetic, interventional, observational, and guideline data. Apixaban is a highly selective, orally active, direct inhibitor of factor Xa, with well-established pharmacokinetics and consistent clinical outcomes across a broad range of patient populations, including those with kidney impairment. Overall, the scientific literature has shown that apixaban has a favorable clinical efficacy and safety profile compared with vitamin K antagonists for patients with AF or VTE and comorbid kidney impairment. These data support the approved label dosing strategy of apixaban in reducing the risk of stroke/systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF and in treating VTE across all ranges of kidney function. Both clinician experience and knowledge of patient-specific factors may be required in the management of comorbid patients with advanced CKD or those requiring dialysis, as data on these patients are limited.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Inhibidores del Factor Xa , Pirazoles , Piridonas , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Piridonas/farmacocinética , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Pirazoles/farmacocinética , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/farmacocinética , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/farmacocinética , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Many patients with impaired renal function have concurrent indications for anticoagulant therapy, including atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. For mild chronic kidney disease, data from clinical trials and existing guidelines can be applied to clinical management. The benefits and harms of anticoagulation therapy in patients with more advanced renal impairment are nuanced, as both thrombotic and bleeding risk are increased. Until recently, data regarding anticoagulants in severe renal impairment were primarily observational, but emerging evidence includes a few small clinical trials and the emergence of novel agents hypothesized to have improved efficacy and safety in this population. In this review, we summarize existing data on anticoagulation in patients with chronic kidney disease. We suggest a framework for anticoagulation decision-making in the burgeoning worldwide population of patients with chronic kidney disease.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite the technological advancements in catheter ablation strategies, the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) post-ablation remains a concern that requires further investigation. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have shown a significant effect on weight reduction, which in turn is associated with freedom from AF recurrence in both patients who are obese and not obese undergoing ablation. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the available evidence on the efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists in maintaining sinus rhythm post-ablation. METHODS: Medline, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched until June 9, 2024. Double-independent study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled using DerSimonian-Laird random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Three propensity score-matched studies (n = 6031 participants) were analyzed. Over a 12-months follow-up, the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists was associated with a significant reduction in AF recurrence compared to controls, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.549, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [0.315, 0.956], P = 0.034; I2 = 57%. No significant heterogeneity was observed (Q statistic = 4.6, heterogeneity P = 0.1). CONCLUSION: The use of GLP-1 receptor agonists is associated with a lower risk of AF recurrence in patients receiving AF ablation therapy. Further large-scale randomized trials are necessary to explore the efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists in maintaining ablation outcomes over the long term.