RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a prevalent, disabling, inflammatory, neurodegenerative disease that typically manifests during a highly productive stage of life. Interferon beta-1a was among the first approved disease-modifying therapies for MS and remains among the first-line treatment options. Pegylation of the interferon beta-1a molecule prolongs its half-life while maintaining its efficacy and safety profile. In PEGINTEGRITY study, we aimed to compare peginterferon beta-1a with interferon beta-1a in terms of efficacy and safety in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients. METHODS: This study was a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center Phase 3 trial conducted in Iran in participants with RRMS. Participants received 125 µg of subcutaneous peginterferon beta-1a every two weeks or 30 µg of intramuscular interferon beta-1a once a week for up to 96 weeks. The primary outcome was the non-inferiority of peginterferon beta-1a to interferon beta-1a in reducing annualized relapse rate (ARR). Other outcomes included the number of patients with 12-week confirmed disability progression, the number of new or newly-enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions, the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions, the number of new T1 hypointense lesions, the volume of new or newly-enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions, changes in brain volume, immunogenicity, and safety assessments. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled and assigned to two arms of the study, each consisting of 84 participants. Totally, 41 participants (24 patients in the peginterferon beta-1a group and 17 patients in the interferon beta-1a group) were withdrawn from the study. The withdrawn patients were included in the per-protocol analysis for the period of time they were in the study. In 96 weeks, in the per-protocol population, the ARR was 0.05 in the peginterferon beta-1a group versus 0.11 in the interferon beta-1a group, which does not reflect a statistically significant difference (p=0.09; 95 % CI, 0.18-1.14). Considering the upper limit of the one-sided 95 % CI of the rate ratio of peginterferon beta-1a compared to interferon beta-1a, as well as the non-inferiority margin, it can be concluded that the primary outcome was met. The results were also comparable for other efficacy and safety outcomes. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate the non-inferiority of peginterferon beta-1a to interferon beta-1a with similar efficacy in 96-week ARR in RRMS patients. Both arms were also comparable in other efficacy outcomes and safety profiles with no statistically significant differences. These findings support considering peginterferon beta-1a as a safe and efficient option in patients with RRMS. This study was registered on Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT201612306135N8) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05242133).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In recent years a broader range of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive treatment options have emerged for people with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (PMS). While consensus supports these options as reducing relapses, their relative benefit and safety profiles remain unclear due to a lack of direct comparison trials. OBJECTIVES: To compare through network meta-analysis the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, cyclophosphamide, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, diroximel fumarate, fingolimod, fludarabine, glatiramer acetate, immunoglobulins, interferon beta 1-a and beta 1-b, interferon beta-1b (Betaferon), interferon beta-1a (Avonex, Rebif), laquinimod, leflunomide, methotrexate, minocycline, mitoxantrone, mycophenolate mofetil, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ozanimod, pegylated interferon beta-1a, ponesimod, rituximab, siponimod, corticosteroids, and teriflunomide for PMS. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase up to August 2022, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that studied one or more treatments as monotherapy, compared to placebo or to another active agent, for use in adults with PMS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. We performed data synthesis by pair-wise and network meta-analysis. We assessed the certainty of the body of evidence according to GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 23 studies involving a total of 10,167 participants. The most frequent (39% of studies) reason for a rating of high risk of bias was sponsor role in study authorship and data management and analysis. Other concerns were performance, attrition, and selective reporting bias, with 8.7% of studies at high risk of bias for all three of these domains. The common comparator for network analysis was placebo. Relapses over 12 months: assessed in one study (318 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Relapses over 24 months: assessed in six studies (1622 participants). The number of people with clinical relapses is probably trivially reduced with rituximab (risk ratio (RR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 1.95; moderate certainty evidence). None of the remaining treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Relapses over 36 months: assessed in four studies (2095 participants). The number of people with clinical relapses is probably trivially reduced with interferon beta-1b (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.93; moderate certainty evidence). None of the remaining treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Disability worsening over 24 months: assessed in 11 studies (5284 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Disability worsening over 36 months: assessed in five studies (2827 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Serious adverse events: assessed in 15 studies (8019 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Discontinuation due to adverse events: assessed in 21 studies (9981 participants). The number of people who discontinued treatment due to adverse events is trivially increased with interferon beta-1a (odds ratio (OR) 2.93, 95% CI 1.64 to 5.26; high certainty evidence). The number of people who discontinued treatment due to adverse events is probably trivially increased with rituximab (OR 4.00, 95% CI 0.84 to 19.12; moderate certainty evidence); interferon beta-1b (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.92 to 4.61; moderate certainty evidence); immunoglobulins (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.99 to 3.84; moderate certainty evidence); glatiramer acetate (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.48 to 10.72; moderate certainty evidence); natalizumab (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.90; moderate certainty evidence); siponimod (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.38; moderate certainty evidence); fingolimod (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.46 to 3.60; moderate certainty evidence), and ocrelizumab (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.86; moderate certainty evidence). None of the remaining treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The number of people with PMS with relapses is probably slightly reduced with rituximab at two years, and interferon beta-1b at three years, compared to placebo. Both drugs are also probably associated with a slightly higher proportion of withdrawals due to adverse events, as are immunoglobulins, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod, siponimod, and ocrelizumab; we have high confidence that this is the case with interferon beta-1a. We found only low or very low certainty evidence relating to disability progression for the included disease-modifying treatments compared to placebo, largely due to imprecision. We are also uncertain about the effect of interventions on serious adverse events, also because of imprecision. These findings are due in part to the short follow-up of the included RCTs, which lacked detection of less common severe adverse events. Moreover, the funding source of many included studies may have introduced bias into the results. Future research on PMS should include head-to-head rather than placebo-controlled trials, with a longer follow-up of at least three years. Given the relative rarity of PMS, controlled, non-randomised studies on large samples may usefully integrate data from pivotal RCTs. Outcomes valuable and meaningful to people with PMS should be consistently adopted and measured to permit the evaluation of relative effectiveness among treatments.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is characterized by a more rapid accumulation of CNS inflammation than adult-onset MS (AOMS), the therapeutic algorithms applied in POMS are usually based on AOMS therapeutic outcomes. To define a high-efficacy treatment (HET)-based strategy to treat POMS, we designed an observational retrospective study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of natalizumab (NTZ) in naïve POMS and AOMS. METHODS: Starting from 160 patients, we applied a 2:1 (adult:pediatric) matching on propensity scores and obtained 32 patients with NTZ-treated POMS and 64 with AOMS, estimated from a multivariable logistic regression model. All patients were clinically and radiologically followed up every 6 months for a mean period of 46.0 ± 26.9 months. RESULTS: Following re-baseline at month 6, no difference (log-rank test: p = 0.924) in new and enlarging T2 white matter lesions, postcontrast T1 lesions, and relapse rate were observed between POMS and AOMS throughout the study. Progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) was never observed in POMS, while 9 of 64 patients with AOMS (12.5%) had PIRA events during the follow-up (40.0 ± 25.9 months; log-rank p value 0.0156). JCV seroconversion rate during NTZ infusion did not differ between POMS and AOMS (log-rank test p = 0.3231). Finally, no serious adverse event was observed in both POMS and AOMS. DISCUSSION: The favorable outcomes observed on clinical, especially in PIRA, and radiologic parameters strongly support the use of NTZ as a first-choice HET in POMS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a low-dose, long-term rituximab regimen in the treatment of idiopathic CIDP. METHODS: This study included 15 CIDP patients treated with rituximab. Patients were administered 600 mg of rituximab intravenously every 6 months. Baseline evaluation was conducted before the initiation of rituximab treatment and subsequent evaluations were conducted 6 months after each rituximab infusion at on-site visits. Clinical improvement was objectively determined by improvement of scale score at least decrease ≥1 INCAT or mRS or increase ≥4 MRC or ≥8 cI-RODS after each infusion compared to baseline evaluation. RESULTS: Fifteen CIDP patients were included and 10 of them were typical CIDP and five were distal CIDP. Nine in 15 (60%) patients after first infusion and three in six (50%) patients after second infusion exhibited significant clinical improvement compared to baseline evaluation. Additionally, rituximab facilitated a reduction or cessation of other medications in 73% of patients at last visit. The safety profile was favorable, with no reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: Rituximab presents a promising therapeutic option for idiopathic CIDP, offering both efficacy and safety with a low-dose, long-term regimen.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The reason why some multiple sclerosis (MS) patients show disease activity after alemtuzumab (ALM) is still unclear, but ocrelizumab (OCR) could represent an interesting sequential therapeutic approach. OBJECTIVES: To investigate safety and efficacy of OCR in MS patients with disease activity after two ALM courses. METHODS: Observational retrospective multi-centers Italian cohort study. RESULTS: Seventy-two subjects were included. Mean follow-up (FU) was 2.4 (±1) years. Forty-five patients (62.5%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with infections accounting for 96.7% of cases. A reduction in total lymphocytes was observed between OCR start and 6 months FU, driven by BCD19+ lymphocytes depletion (p < 0.001). Immunoglobulin M (IgM) levels decreased between OCR start and 6 months FU (p < 0.001). At 2-year FU, relapse, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity and disability worsening-free survival were 92.1%, 90.8%, and 89.2%. The evidence of inflammatory activity between the two ALM courses was associated with higher risk of relapse, MRI activity, and NEDA-3 status loss in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS; p = 0.02, p = 0.05, p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: OCR after two ALM courses seemed to be safe and effective. Early IgM hypogammaglobulinemia occurred in a high proportion of patients. The evidence of inflammatory activity between ALM courses seemed to increase the risk of MS re-activation on OCR treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Comparisons between cladribine and other potent immunotherapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of cladribine against fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab and alemtuzumab in relapsing-remitting MS. METHODS: Patients with relapsing-remitting MS treated with cladribine, fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab or alemtuzumab were identified in the global MSBase cohort and two additional UK centres. Patients were followed for ⩾6/12 and had ⩾3 in-person disability assessments. Patients were matched using propensity score. Four pairwise analyses compared annualised relapse rates (ARRs) and disability outcomes. RESULTS: The eligible cohorts consisted of 853 (fingolimod), 464 (natalizumab), 1131 (ocrelizumab), 123 (alemtuzumab) or 493 (cladribine) patients. Cladribine was associated with a lower ARR than fingolimod (0.07 vs. 0.12, p = 0.006) and a higher ARR than natalizumab (0.10 vs. 0.06, p = 0.03), ocrelizumab (0.09 vs. 0.05, p = 0.008) and alemtuzumab (0.17 vs. 0.04, p < 0.001). Compared to cladribine, the risk of disability worsening did not differ in patients treated with fingolimod (hazard ratio (HR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-2.47) or alemtuzumab (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.26-2.07), but was lower for patients treated with natalizumab (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.94) and ocrelizumab (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.78). There was no evidence for a difference in disability improvement. CONCLUSION: Cladribine is an effective therapy that can be viewed as a step up in effectiveness from fingolimod, but is less effective than the most potent intravenous MS therapies.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a potentially life-threatening mucocutaneous autoimmune disease that affects desmoglein-1 and desmoglein-3, leading to intraepithelial vesiculobullous lesions. In the oral mucosa, PV lesions can mimic other diseases such as mucous membrane pemphigoid, other forms of pemphigus, recurrent aphthous stomatitis, erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and virus-induced ulcers like herpes simplex virus (HSV), making diagnosis challenging. The co-occurrence of PV with Crohn's disease is rare and predominantly seen in younger patients. The therapeutic mainstay for both PV and Crohn's disease usually involves systemic corticosteroids combined with immunosuppressants and immunobiological drugs. Literature indicates that the use of these drugs, particularly TNF-alpha inhibitors, for managing autoimmune diseases like Crohn's can potentially induce other autoimmune diseases known as autoimmune-like syndromes, which include episodes of lupus-like syndrome and inflammatory neuropathies. There are few cases in the literature reporting the development of PV in individuals with CD undergoing infliximab therapy. CASE REPORT: A young female with severe Crohn's disease, treated with the TNF-alpha inhibitor infliximab, developed friable pseudomembranous oral ulcerations. Histopathological and immunofluorescence analyses confirmed these as PV. The treatment included clobetasol propionate and low-level photobiomodulation, which resulted in partial improvement. The patient later experienced severe intestinal bleeding, requiring intravenous hydrocortisone therapy, which improved both her systemic condition and oral lesions. Weeks later, new ulcerations caused by herpes virus and candidiasis were identified, leading to treatment with oral acyclovir, a 21-day regimen of oral nystatin rinse, and photodynamic therapy, ultimately healing the oral infections. To manage her condition, the gastroenterologists included methotrexate (25 mg) in her regimen to reduce the immunogenicity of infliximab and minimize corticosteroid use, as the patient was in remission for Crohn's disease, and the oral PV lesions were under control. CONCLUSION: Young patients with Crohn's disease should be referred to an oral medicine specialist for comorbidity investigation, as oral PV and opportunistic infections can arise during immunosuppressive therapy. The use of TNF-alpha inhibitors in patients treated for inflammatory bowel disease, such as Crohn's, should be carefully evaluated for potential side effects, including oral PV.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although Interferon-beta (IFNß) has long been approved as a disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for Multiple sclerosis (MS), flu-like syndrome (FLS) persists as a common adverse effect of interferon therapy. Given the importance of circadian rhythm in regulating physiological processes, we aimed to assess the relationship between patient's chronotype and time of interferon injection with FLS score in MS patients receiving IFNß. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 118 MS patients who were referred to the clinic of neurology of Zanjan Vali-e-Asr Hospital for interferon injection. The included were invited to complete a morningness-eveningness questionnaire (MEQ) assessing patients' chronotype. The following data were extracted from patients' record: age, gender, duration of interferon treatment, type of interferon taken, time of interferon injection (morning/evening), FLS score, MS subtype, and usage of pain killers. All data found were imported and statistically analyzed in SPSS ver.26. RESULTS: According to the patients' record, 114 (96.6%) patients had experienced post-interferon injection FLS with different severities. Statistical analysis revealed no significant relationship between the patient's chronotype and FLS score. Nevertheless, the FLS score was significantly higher in those who had evening injections. CONCLUSIONS: Time of interferon injection was significantly associated with FLS score, with higher FLS score following evening injection. However, no significant relationship was found between the FLS score and the patient's chronotype. It is recommended that further studies assessing circadian rhythm using laboratory tests such as melatonin measurement need to be undertaken to investigate the association of circadian rhythm with post-interferon injection FLS.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: the increase of older adults living with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is associated with higher use of high efficacy therapies (HETs) in a clinical practice. The are no data regarding the safety of HET in this patient group. OBJECTIVE: to analyze the safety of HETs in older people with MS (pwMS) in a real-life cohort. METHODS: retrospective cohort study including pwMS under HETs (cladribine and monoclonal antibodies) treated in two specialized MS centers in Latin America. We compare: pwMS ≥ 50 years old (G1) and < 50 years old (G2). In all pwMS, presence and type of adverse events, and comorbidities were recorded. RESULTS: 882 pwMS were included, 141 (15.9 %) had ≥50 years old, 47 (33.3 %) werunde HETs (G1). The most used DMT in G1 was ocrelizumab (48.9 %), mean time under HETs: 2.06 ± 0.8 years. The most frequent adverse event in G1 was urinary tract infection (UTI) (21.3 %). We did not find significant differences between G1 and G2 in infusion reactions, lymphopenia, neoplasms, respiratory infections, and liver disease. We found differences in the frequency of urinary tract infections (p = 0.004). No cases of VZV reactivation, tuberculosis or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy were registered. In a regression model adjusted for MS evolution, time under HET, EDSS, Charlson comorbidity index and phenotype, patients 50 ≥ under HETs did not have a higher incidence of adverse events compared to < 50 (Adjusted OR 0.72; CI95 % 0.143 -3.43, p = 0.67)} CONCLUSION: the short term use of HETs in pwMS older than 50 years old seems to be safe.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, is approved for treatment of highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) but requires vigilant post-treatment monitoring due to associated risks. The prescription of subsequent therapies following Alemtuzumab, as mandated by label guidance for a treatment-free period of at least 5 years, presents a complex challenge, particularly if there is concurrent conversion to secondary progressive disease course. We described a case-series of five patients starting therapy with Siponimod and followed up for 12 months period converted to secondary progressive MS previously exposed to Alemtuzumab. All patients received Siponimod 2 mg. Clinical evaluation measured with Expanded Disability Status Scale and cognitive evaluation measured with Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis were stable after 12 months on therapy. No severe lymphopenia was recorded, nor serious adverse events. In conclusion, the long-term management of patients treated with Alemtuzumab transitioning to secondary progressive MS requires a proactive and multidisciplinary approach. By addressing the challenges associated with treatment limitations and short-term monitoring recommendations while considering alternative therapeutic options like Siponimod, clinicians can optimize outcomes and ensure continuity of care for individuals with MS.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Motor fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is due to reduced motor cortex (M1) output and altered sensorimotor network (SMN) modulation. Natalizumab, a disease-modifying therapy, reduces neuroinflammation and improves fatigue. However, some patients treated with natalizumab experience fatigue recurrence ('wearing-off') before subsequent infusions. Wearing-off provides a valuable window into MS-related motor fatigue mechanisms in a controlled, clinically stable, setting. This study investigates whether wearing-off is associated with worsening motor fatigue and its neurophysiological mechanisms and assesses natalizumab's effect on MS-related fatigue. Forty-five relapsing-remitting MS patients with wearing-off symptoms were evaluated pre- and post-natalizumab infusion. Assessments included evaluating disability levels, depressive symptoms, and the impact of fatigue symptoms on cognitive, physical, and psychosocial functioning. The motor fatigue index was computed through the number of blocks completed during a fatiguing task and peripheral, central, and supraspinal fatigue (M1 output) were evaluated by measuring the superimposed twitches evoked by peripheral nerve and transcranial magnetic stimulation of M1. Transcranial magnetic stimulation-electroencephalography assessed M1 effective connectivity by measuring TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) within the SMN before- and after the task. We found that wearing-off was associated with increased motor fatigue index, increased central and supraspinal fatigue, and diminished task-related modulation of TEPs compared to post-natalizumab infusion. Wearing-off was also associated with worsened fatigue impact and depression symptom scores. We conclude that the wearing-off phenomenon is associated with worsening motor fatigue due to altered M1 output and modulation of the SMN. Motor fatigue in MS may reflect reversible, inflammation-related changes in the SMN that natalizumab can modulate. Our findings apply primarily to MS patients receiving natalizumab, emphasizing the need for further research on other treatments with wearing-off.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ocrelizumab is the only disease-modifying therapy (DMT) approved for the treatment of people with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (pwPPMS). OBJECTIVES: To provide real-world evidence of ocrelizumab effectiveness and safety in pwPPMS in Croatian MS centers. METHODS: A retrospective observational multi-center study of pwPPMS who were started on ocrelizumab in 7 MS centers in Croatia. RESULTS: We identified 230 pwPPMS of whom 176 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up of the cohort was 2.73 (0.51-5.77) years. During the follow-up, 50 (28.4%) pwPPMS experienced confirmed disability worsening (CDW) and 19 (10.8%) stopped treatment with ocrelizumab. Baseline EDSS >5 was a statistically significant positive predictor for the development of CDW and/or stop of the treatment due to any cause (OR 2.482, 95% C.I. 1.192-5.166, p = 0.015). However, there was no significant difference in the development of CDW and/or stop of the treatment due to any cause if stratifying the patients based on active PPMS, age at treatment start (≤55 years vs >55 years), disease duration at treatment start (≤10 years vs >10 years), or EDSS at treatment start (≤5.0 vs >5.0). During the follow-up, 26 (14.8%) pwPPMS experienced infusion reactions, 64 (36.4%) had an infection and 4 (2.3%) developed a tumor. The percentage of pwPPMS with low levels of IgG was persistently above 10% and with low levels of IgM was persistently above 20% after cycle 4. CONCLUSION: Our real-world data support the use of ocrelizumab in a much broader pwPPMS population than in the original randomized controlled trial.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: No direct comparisons of the effect of natalizumab and ocrelizumab on progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and relapse-associated worsening (RAW) events are currently available. We aimed to compare the risk of achieving first 6 months confirmed PIRA and RAW events and irreversible Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 4.0 and 6.0 in a cohort of naïve patients treated with natalizumab or ocrelizumab from the Italian Multiple Sclerosis Register. METHODS: Patients with a first visit within 1 year from onset, treated with natalizumab or ocrelizumab, and ≥3 visits were extracted. Pairwise propensity score-matched analyses were performed. Risk of reaching the first PIRA, RAW, and EDSS 4.0 and 6.0 events were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to show cumulative probabilities of reaching outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 770 subjects were included (natalizumab = 568; ocrelizumab = 212) and the propensity score-matching retrieved 195 pairs. No RAW events were found in natalizumab group and only 1 was reported in ocrelizumab group. A first PIRA event was reached by 23 natalizumab and 25 ocrelizumab exposed patients; 7 natalizumab- and 10 ocrelizumab-treated patients obtained an irreversible EDSS 4.0, while 13 natalizumab- and 15 ocrelizumab-treated patients reached an irreversible EDSS 6.0. No differences between the two groups were found in the risk (HR, 95%CI) of reaching a first PIRA (1.04, 0.59-1.84; p = 0.88) event, an irreversible EDSS 4.0 (1.23, 0.57-2.66; p = 0.60) and 6.0 (0.93, 0.32-2.68; p = 0.89). INTERPRETATION: Both medications strongly suppress RAW events and, in the short term, the risk of achieving PIRA events, EDSS 4.0 and 6.0 milestones is not significantly different.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a severe neurologic disease resulting from JC virus reactivation in immunocompromised patients. Certain multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are associated with PML risk, such as natalizumab and, more rarely, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1P-RMs). Although natalizumab-associated PML is well documented, information on S1P-RM-associated PML is limited. The aim of this study is to compare clinical presentations and outcomes between the 2 groups. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with PML from 2009 to 2022 treated with S1P-RMs or natalizumab. Data on clinical and radiologic presentation, outcomes, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), survival, disability (using the modified Ranking scale-mRS), and MS relapses post-PML were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 88 patients, 84 were analyzed (20 S1P-RM, 64 natalizumab). S1P-RM-associated PML was diagnosed in older patients (median age 52 vs 44 years, p < 0.001) and after longer treatment duration (median 63.9 vs 40 months, p < 0.001). Similarly, S1P-RM patients were more prone to show symptoms at diagnosis (100 vs 80.6%, p = 0.035), had more disseminated lesions (80% vs 34.9%, p = 0.002), and had higher gadolinium enhancement (65% vs 39.1%, p = 0.042). Natalizumab patients had a higher IRIS development rate (OR: 8.3 [1.92-33.3]). Overall, the outcome (mRS) at 12 months was similar in the 2 groups (OR: 0.81 [0.32-2.0]). Yet, post-treatment MS activity was higher in S1P-RM cases (OR: 5.7 [1.4-22.2]). DISCUSSION: S1P-RM-associated PML shows reduced IRIS risk but higher post-treatment MS activity. Clinicians should tailor post-PML treatment based on pre-PML medication.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: One strategy to mitigate progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) risk is to switch to other highly effective disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). However, the optimal switch DMT following natalizumab (NTZ) discontinuation is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to determine the most effective and tolerable DMTs to switch to following NTZ discontinuation due to John Cunningham virus (JCV) antibody positivity. METHODS: This is a multicenter observational cohort study that included all stable relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who were treated with NTZ for at least 6 months before switching therapy due to JCV antibody positivity. RESULTS: Of 321 patients, 255 switched from NTZ to rituximab/ocrelizumab, 52 to fingolimod, and 14 to alemtuzumab, with higher annualized relapse rate (ARR) in fingolimod switchers (0.193) compared with rituximab/ocrelizumab or alemtuzumab (0.028 and 0.032, respectively). Fingolimod switchers also had increased disability progression (p = 0.014) and a higher proportion developed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions compared with rituximab/ocrelizumab (62.9% vs. 13.0%, p < 0.001, and 66.6% vs. 24.0%, p < 0.001, respectively). Mean drug survival favored rituximab/ocrelizumab or alemtuzumab over fingolimod (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study shows superior effectiveness of rituximab/ocrelizumab and alemtuzumab compared with fingolimod in stable patients switching from NTZ due to JC virus antibody positivity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that rituximab (RTX) therapy might be beneficial in reducing relapse rates in patients with IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD). Therefore, we aimed to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of RTX induction treatment and the effect of RTX maintenance in patients with IgG4-RD. METHODS: The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42023427352). PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane database, Scopus, and the Web of Science were interrogated to identify studies that evaluated the impact of RTX on prognosis in IgG4-RD. We explored the impact of various subgroups of factors on relapse outcomes and focused on the possible role of maintenance therapy in reducing relapse rates. The pooled incidence of adverse events of RTX therapy and the influencing factors have also been evaluated. RESULTS: Eighteen studies comprising 374 patients (mean age 56.0 ± 8.7 years; male 73.7 %) with a mean follow-up duration of 23.4 ± 16.3 months were included. The pooled estimate of the response rate, complete remission rate, overall relapse rate, adverse event rate, and serious adverse event rate of RTX induction therapy were 97.3 % (95 % CI, 94.7 %-99.1 %), 55.8 % (95 % CI, 39.6 %-71.3 %), 16.9 % (95 % CI, 8.7 %-27.1 %), 31.6 % (95 % CI, 16.7 %-48.9 %) and 3.9 % (95 % CI, 0.8 %-8.9 %), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the pooled relapse rate was significantly lower in studies with maintenance than without maintenance (2.8% vs 21.5 %, p < 0.01). Pooled Kaplan-Meier relapse curves also demonstrated that RTX maintenance therapy provided a better prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: RTX induction therapy appears to have satisfactory efficacy in the induction of remission in IgG4-RD. In addition, prophylactic RTX maintenance therapy after induction may be beneficial in preventing relapse of IgG4-RD.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Administration of a new drug candidate in a first-in-human (FIH) clinical trial is a particularly challenging phase in drug development and is especially true for immunomodulators, which are a diverse and complex class of drugs with a broad range of mechanisms of action and associated safety risks. Risk is generally greater for immunostimulators, in which safety concerns are associated with acute toxicity, compared to immunosuppressors, where the risks are related to chronic effects. Current methodologies for FIH dose selection for immunostimulators are focused primarily on identifying the minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL), which has often resulted in sub-therapeutic doses, leading to long and costly escalation phases. The Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) - Immuno-Safety Technical Committee (ITC) organized a project to address this issue through two complementary approaches: (i) an industry survey on FIH dose selection strategies and (ii) detailed case studies for immunomodulators in oncology and non-oncology indications. Key messages from the industry survey responses highlighted a preference toward more dynamic PK/PD approaches as in vitro assays are seemingly not representative of true physiological conditions for immunomodulators. These principles are highlighted in case studies. To address the above themes, we have proposed a revised decision tree, which expands on the guidance by the IQ MABEL Working Group (Leach et al. 2021). This approach facilitates a more refined recommendation of FIH dose selection for immunomodulators, allowing for a nuanced consideration of their mechanisms of action (MOAs) and the associated risk-to-benefit ratio, among other factors.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To report CD19+ B-cell counts and possible adverse effects on infants of mothers exposed to anti-CD20 mAbs ≤6 months before/during pregnancy or lactation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using data from the German nationwide neuroimmunologic pregnancy registry. Inclusion criteria involved infants whose mothers received anti-CD20 mAbs ≤6 months before/during pregnancy or lactation, with ≥1 postnatal CD19+ B-cell count. Main outcomes were absolute and relative CD19+ B-cell counts. Comparison with reference values was performed conservatively in a subgroup with maternal exposure ≤3 months before/during pregnancy. Additional outcomes included pregnancy results, severe infections, and lymphocyte counts. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 49 infants (F:M 25:24) exposed to anti-CD20 mAbs ≤6 months before/during pregnancy or lactation. CD19+ B-cell and lymphocyte counts in 40 infants with maternal exposure ≤3 months before/during pregnancy were comparable with normative values. Only 2 cases of complete CD19+ B-cell depletion occurred after second-trimester and third-trimester ocrelizumab exposure, with repopulation observed within 2 months. Exclusive lactation exposure had no significant effect on infants' absolute CD19+ B-cell counts. DISCUSSION: Administering anti-CD20 mAbs before or at the pregnancy onset, or during lactation, seems safe without significant impact on infant B-cell development. However, second-trimester or third-trimester exposure can cause CD19+ B-cell depletion due to placental transfer, necessitating monitoring and postponing live vaccines.

Asunto(s)