Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.206
Filtrar
1.
Inquiry ; 61: 469580241275328, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39237851

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a lot of stress for healthcare personnel. They are subjected to arduous and stressful working hours and may contract infection. The objectives of this study were to (i) assess the level of occupational stress and the prevalence of burnout among healthcare workers (HCWs) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic and (ii) to identify some sociodemographic characteristics and work-related factors that may influence the level of stress and burnout among such HCWs. An online survey was distributed on social media websites and groups of HCWs in KSA. The survey depended on the stress domain of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) and the work-related burnout domain of Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI). Data were collected using a Google form and then analyzed. Among 478 respondents, 37.7% of studied HCWs reported mild to extremely severe stress, and 47.9% of them reported work-related burnout. Occupational stress and burnout were more prevalent among front-line HCWs (43.9% and 55%) than among second-line HCWs (31.2% and 40.8%). The mean scores of occupational stress and burnout were significantly much higher among frontline physicians and nurses particularly those who are females, of younger age (≤40 years), with few years of work experience (≤15 years), being married, having chronic disease, and those previously infected by COVID-19. HCWs reported a high prevalence of occupational stress and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic. Establishing policies and guidelines, enhancing working conditions, and providing continuous psychological support and assurance to HCWs are recommended to improve their resilience and increase their coping capacities toward pandemics.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Estrés Laboral , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Personal de Salud/psicología , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Adulto , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pandemias , Estudios Transversales
2.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39223045

RESUMEN

Objective: To understand the occupational stress and mental health status of hospital infection prevention and control practitioner (HIPCPs) in medical institutions, and analyze their main influencing factors. Methods: In November 2021, 550 nosocomial infection managers in Tianjin were randomly selected to conduct a questionnaire survey using the Concise Occupational Stress Questionnaire, Depression Screening Scale (PHQ-9) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). 497 valid questionnaires were obtained, and the total recovery efficiency was 90.36%. Single factor analysis and multivariate logistic regression method were used to analyze the main influencing factors of occupational stress and mental health status of psychiatric managers. Results: The detection rate of anxiety and depression among 497 HIPCPs was 22.73% (113/497) and 58.95% (293/497), respectively. Gender and major were the influencing factors of depression (P=0.000, 0.001). Average working hours>52 hours per week and night shift days>1 days per week were the influencing factors of anxiety (P=0.035, 0.014). Average working hours>52 h per week, night shift days >1 d per week and different majors were the influencing factors of occupational stress (P=0.000, 0.025, 0.010). Multivariate logistic regression results showed that the risk of anxiety in those who worked more than 52 hours per week was 1.753 times that of those who worked less than 52 hours per week (P=0.038), and the risk of depression in women was 3.071 times that of men (P=0.006) . Conclusion: Working hours are an important influencing factor for occupational stress and anxiety among HIPCPs. In order to reduce the occurrence of occupational stress and mental health problems, it is necessary to strengthen psychological counseling for HIPCPs and balance work and rest.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , Depresión , Estrés Laboral , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Adulto , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Salud Mental , China/epidemiología , Análisis Multivariante , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Logísticos
3.
Afr J Reprod Health ; 28(8): 67-76, 2024 Aug 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39225425

RESUMEN

The novel coronavirus has significantly impacted healthcare systems worldwide, exposing healthcare professionals (HCPs) to work-related stressors to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2. This study aimed to assess the occupational stress of HCPs in Lagos State, Nigeria, using a qualitative approach. The study involved nine HCPs from various departments, including doctors, nurses, and medical laboratory technicians. The main causes of stress were workload, policy changes, and extended use of personal protective gear. The study found high levels of occupational stress among HCPs, with workload being the main cause. The impact of the disease outbreak crisis on HCPs' lives and work demands was observed, with occupational demands categorized into safety risk at work and public perceptions. Employers and unions must respond to HCPs' needs for workplace protection and appropriate help to address stressors.


Le nouveau coronavirus a eu un impact significatif sur les systèmes de soins de santé dans le monde entier, exposant les professionnels de la santé (HCP) à des facteurs de stress liés au travail pour empêcher la propagation du SARS-CoV-2. Cette étude visait à évaluer le stress professionnel des HCP dans l'État de Lagos, au Nigeria, en utilisant une approche qualitative. L'étude a impliqué neuf HCP de divers départements, y compris des médecins, des infirmières et des techniciens de laboratoire médical. Les principales causes du stress étaient la charge de travail, les changements de politique et l'utilisation prolongée d'équipements de protection personnelle. L'étude a révélé des niveaux élevés de stress professionnel parmi les HCP, avec la charge de travail étant la principale cause. L'impact de la crise de l'épidémie sur la vie et les exigences professionnelles des HCP a été observé, les demandes de travail étant classées en catégories de risques pour la sécurité au travail et de perceptions du public. Les employeurs et les syndicats doivent répondre aux besoins des HCP en matière de protection des lieux de travail et d'aide appropriée pour faire face aux facteurs de stress.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Estrés Laboral , SARS-CoV-2 , Carga de Trabajo , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/psicología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Nigeria/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Carga de Trabajo/psicología , Equipo de Protección Personal , Investigación Cualitativa , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Biomed Res Int ; 2024: 8871959, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39286281

RESUMEN

Study Objective: The present study is aimed at providing an assessment of the changes in burnout, job strain, isostrain, sleepiness, and fatigue levels over time and identifying factors associated with these symptoms among healthcare workers in French emergency departments (EDs). Method: We conducted a prospective, multicenter study in four EDs and an emergency medical service. Participants completed questionnaires at inclusion and at 90 days to assess burnout, job strain, isostrain, sleepiness, and fatigue. Results: A total of 211 respondents (43.5%) completed the questionnaires at inclusion. At the beginning of the study, 84 (40.8%) participants presented symptoms of burnout, 86 (43.2%) had symptoms of job strain, and 58 (29.4%) of isostrain. Forty-two (20.1%) healthcare workers presented symptoms of sleepiness, and 8 (3.8%) had symptoms of fatigue. We found that symptoms of burnout were more frequent for healthcare workers with a previous psychiatric history (55.3% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.02) and were lower among participants who had at least one dependent child (33.1% vs. 48.3%, p = 0.013). Symptoms of job strain were higher among administrative staff compared to physicians (55.6% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.01) and among healthcare workers with managerial responsibilities compared to those without (45.6% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.015). Symptoms of isostrain were higher among administrative staff (42.3%) compared to paramedics (34.1%) and physicians (19.8%, p = 0.026). Conclusion: We identified that potential factors associated with the emergence of symptoms of burnout and job strain are suggested, underlining several areas of improvement for the prevention against mental health disorders in the specific population of ED healthcare workers. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04383886.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , COVID-19 , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Personal de Salud , Salud Mental , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Personal de Salud/psicología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , SARS-CoV-2 , Fatiga/epidemiología , Francia/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología
5.
BMJ Open ; 14(9): e089252, 2024 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39237279

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To understand the current status of occupational stress, occupational burn-out and sleep quality among ambulance drivers in Hengyang, China and to analyse the relationship between occupational stress, occupational burn-out and sleep quality of ambulance drivers. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: Prehospital emergency centre of third-class hospital in Hengyang, China. PARTICIPANTS: From October 2023 to December 2023, a cross-sectional survey was conducted, with 213 ambulance drivers from Hengyang, China, selected as participants. METHODS: General demographic questionnaires, the Chinese Occupational Stress Inventory, the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index were used for data collection and analysis. RESULTS: Occupational stress among ambulance drivers was positively correlated with occupational burn-out and sleep quality (r=0.528, 0.447, both p<0.01) while occupational burn-out was positively correlated with sleep quality (r=0.394, p<0.01). Occupational burn-out partially mediated the relationship between occupational stress and sleep quality among ambulance drivers, with a mediation effect value of 0.168, accounting for 26.09% of the total effect. CONCLUSION: The sleep quality of ambulance drivers in Hengyang, China is suboptimal, with occupational stress directly predicting sleep quality. Occupational burn-out plays a partial positive mediating role between occupational stress and sleep quality among ambulance drivers. Reducing occupational stress and burn-out is beneficial for improving the sleep quality of ambulance drivers.


Asunto(s)
Ambulancias , Agotamiento Profesional , Estrés Laboral , Calidad del Sueño , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , China/epidemiología , Adulto , Ambulancias/estadística & datos numéricos , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología
6.
BMJ Open ; 14(8): e079979, 2024 Aug 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39209494

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Specialty nurses play a significant role in improving patient care; however, little is known about the factors affecting their work engagement. This study aimed to explore the relationship between role stress and work engagement among specialty nurses in China. DESIGN: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was applied in this study. SETTING: The study was conducted in the Henan Provincial People's Hospital in China. PARTICIPANTS: From March to April 2023, we conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study, using convenience sampling to recruit 972 specialty nurses from 42 specialised fields in China. METHODS: An online questionnaire survey was conducted using the Basic Information Questionnaire, Role Stress Scale and Specialty Nurse Work Engagement Scale. The collected data were analysed by using SPSS 21.0 software. The differences in total work engagement scores between subgroups were investigated using a single-factor analysis of variance. A Spearman's rank correlation and a Pearson's correlation were used to determine the relationship between general information, role stress and work engagement. A ridge regression analysis explored the impact of role stress on work engagement. RESULTS: The total score of role stress was (52.44±19.92) and the total score of work engagement was (140.27±17.76). Among the scores of various dimensions of specialty nurses' work engagement, the standardised score for work attitude was the highest (4.54±0.56), followed by work values (4.46±0.64); the standardised score of work enthusiasm and focus was the lowest (4.22±0.64). Additionally, role ambiguity (r=-0.352, p<0.001), role conflict (r=-0.367, p<0.001), role overload (r=-0.313, p<0.001) and role stress (r=-0.380, p<0.001) were negatively correlated with work engagement. The total score of role stress was negatively correlated with the total score of work engagement; the results of ridge regression analysis showed that age, professional title and role stress explain 14.6% of the variance in work engagement. CONCLUSION: Our study found that specialty nurses' work engagement was mid-level or above. Role stress was significantly and negatively correlated with specialty nurses' work engagement, which was an important predictor of their work engagement. Nursing managers should instate effective measures to reduce role stress, thereby increasing work engagement.


Asunto(s)
Estrés Laboral , Compromiso Laboral , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , China/epidemiología , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rol de la Enfermera , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
7.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(16): e032414, 2024 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39140284

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial stressors at work, defined by the job strain and effort-reward imbalance at work (ERI) models, were shown to increase coronary heart disease risk. No previous study has examined the adverse effect of psychosocial stressors at work from both models on atrial fibrillation (AF) incidence. The objective of this study was to examine the separate and combined effect of psychosocial stressors at work from the job strain and ERI models on AF incidence in a prospective cohort study. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 5926 white-collar workers (3021 women and 2905 men) free of cardiovascular disease at baseline were followed for an average of 18 years. Job strain (high psychological demands combined with low decision latitude) and ERI were assessed using validated instruments. AF events were identified in medical databases with universal coverage. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated using Cox regression models, controlling for socioeconomic characteristics and lifestyle-related and clinical risk factors. A total of 186 AF incident events were identified over 18 years. Workers exposed to job strain (HR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.14-2.92]) and ERI (HR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.05-1.98]) had a higher risk of AF in fully adjusted models. Combined exposure to job strain and ERI was associated with a 2-fold AF risk increase (HR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.26-3.07]). CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial stressors at work from the job strain and ERI models are associated with an increased risk of AF, separately and in combination. Workplace prevention strategies targeting these psychosocial stressors at work may be effective to reduce the burden associated with AF.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Estrés Laboral , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/psicología , Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
8.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0308972, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39172911

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Burnout, characterised by emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalisation (DP) and reduced personal accomplishment (PA), is caused by chronic workplace stress. Though widely reported in doctors, variability in definitions and assessment methods render comparisons between studies challenging. Furthermore, traditional methods of reporting burnout can be misleading, focusing more on individuals than on the workplace. Various scores from Maslach Burnout inventory (MBI) have been previously reported as 'burnout', inflating reported prevalence. Recent research suggests using latent profile analysis (LPA), to explore the continuum from engagement to burnout, as distinct patterns of working life may contribute to different profiles. AIMS: To examine the prevalence of latent burnout profiles (LBP) amongst Irish hospital doctors. METHODS: LBP categorisation of MBI was applied to responses from 1610 hospital doctors from a national survey. Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) questionnaire and work ability score were used to measure work stress and work ability. RESULTS: In line with LBP categorisation, the respondents were classified as follow: 23% (N = 364) Engaged; 21% (N = 332) Burnout (High EE and DP), Overextended (N = 476, 30%); 22% (N = 355) Ineffective (low PA score), 5% (N = 83) Disengaged (high DP scores). Consultants were more likely to be classified as Engaged than trainees. Those classified as Burnout were younger. Females were more likely to be classified as Overextended. Work stress was associated with Overextended, Disengaged and Burnout profiles. Insufficient workability was associated with Burnout profile. CONCLUSIONS: The use of LPA provides more nuanced exploration of the phenomenon which can be correlated with workplace features, pointing to potential interventions.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Médicos , Humanos , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Irlanda/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Médicos/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Prevalencia , Satisfacción en el Trabajo
10.
J Spec Pediatr Nurs ; 29(4): e12437, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39183593

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the factors influencing pediatric nurses' job stress, including their level of fatigue and partnerships with the parents of patients. This investigation aimed to findings of this study may lead to the development of strategies to reduce pediatric nurse's job stress. DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants were recruited from pediatric, pediatric intensive care, and neonatal intensive care units across seven general hospitals. Eligibility requires a minimum of 6 months of experience in pediatric nursing. The sample size was determined using the G*power program, considering various variables, including age, marital status, presence of children, and work-related characteristics, leading to a final sample size of 135, adjusted for a 10% dropout rate. Data collection was conducted through self-report questionnaires, and analysis involved frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-tests, ANOVA, and stepwise multiple regression, using SPSS Statistics 27.0. RESULTS: This study confirmed a significant correlation between pediatric nurses' fatigue and job stress, with higher levels of fatigue associated with increased job stress. Stepwise regression analysis showed that fatigue and age were significant predictors of job stress among pediatric nurses, explaining 23% of the variance. However, detailed analysis showed that younger nurses had lower job stress scores compared to older nurses. This result suggests that more experienced nurses may experience higher job stress due to increased responsibilities and emotional burdens. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This study identified the need for effective strategies to manage fatigue and reduce job stress among pediatric nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Younger nurses, particularly those under 25 and between 26 and 30 years old, experience lower job stress compared to older nurses. Comprehensive support systems should be developed, including workload management, emotional support, and programs to enhance partnerships between nurses and parents. These strategies can improve job satisfaction and the quality of care provided to young patients. Additionally, they ensure a more resilient and effective healthcare workforce during pandemics and similar crises.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Fatiga , Enfermeras Pediátricas , Estrés Laboral , Enfermería Pediátrica , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Adulto , Enfermeras Pediátricas/psicología , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Fatiga/psicología , Fatiga/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Padres/psicología , Pandemias , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , SARS-CoV-2 , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0307895, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39159238

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Construction workers are a population that is at risk for mental illnesses such as depression, anxiety, and even suicide due to the high stress and physical demands of their work. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors for depression, anxiety, and stress among Bangladeshi construction workers. METHODS: From February 2022 to June 2022, community-based cross-sectional research was conducted among construction workers. Survey data was gathered using interviewer administered questionnaires with 502 participants from the construction sites. Data were collected based on the information related to socio-demographics, lifestyle, occupation, health hazards, and mental health (i.e., depression, anxiety, and stress). The results were interpreted using the chi-square test and logistic regression utilizing SPSS statistical software. RESULTS: The study revealed the prevalence rates of depression, anxiety, and stress among construction workers to be 17.9%, 30.3%, and 12%, respectively. Key findings indicate that construction workers who maintained a healthy sleep duration were 64% less likely to be depressed compared to those with poor sleep (AOR = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.21-0.61, p<0.001). Workers who did not experience breathing issues upon starting construction work had a 45% lower likelihood of experiencing depression (AOR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.32-0.97, p = 0.037) and an 82% lower likelihood of experiencing anxiety (AOR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.11-0.30, p<0.001). Bricklayer construction workers were 72% less likely to experience stress (AOR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.08-0.95, p = 0.041), and workers without breathing issues after starting construction work were 66% less likely to experience stress (AOR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.17-0.66, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study found that depression, anxiety, and stress are prevalent among construction workers in Bangladesh, with breathing issues as a significant risk factor. Thus, there is a need for effective measures to reduce these problems and provide a safe working environment for construction workers to ensure their productivity and the country's overall growth.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , Depresión , Humanos , Bangladesh/epidemiología , Adulto , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Factores de Riesgo , Depresión/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Industria de la Construcción , Adulto Joven , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología
12.
J Nurs Adm ; 54(9): 479-487, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39166810

RESUMEN

AIM: To describe and compare the prevalence of assaults and aggressive patient behavior among frontline staff in behavioral health (BH), medical-surgical (MS), and emergency department (ED) settings and examine the impact on staff health, work stress, work engagement, and intent to leave their position. BACKGROUND: Patient verbal and physical assaults have significant staff consequences, including decreased work productivity, increased burnout, job dissatisfaction, absenteeism, turnover, and intentions to leave. METHODS: Using a descriptive cross-sectional design, data were collected from a sample of 432 frontline staff working in ED, BH, and MS settings across 3 healthcare systems. RESULTS: The majority of frontline staff (74%) reported experiencing verbal aggression often/frequently, significantly impacting their mental health, work engagement, stress levels, and intent to leave. All 3 specialty groups reported a significant increase in verbal/psychological assaults and physical assaults since the pandemic's onset. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on assaultive/aggressive behaviors. Nurse leaders must strategize on methods to decrease the normalization of violence against healthcare workers and support research aimed at evidence-based interventions to reduce such incidences of violence and ensure the well-being of healthcare workers.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Estrés Laboral , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Adulto , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Agresión/psicología , Reorganización del Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Violencia Laboral/psicología , Violencia Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Intención , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
13.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 2257, 2024 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39164666

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Occupational stress is increasing globally and affecting all workplaces and countries' health professionals. Despite its significant impact on healthcare delivery, limited studies have actually compared the prevalence, causes, effects, and coping strategies of stress among nurses working in hospitals with variation in capacity and function in Ghana. We, therefore, examined and compared the prevalence, causes, effects and coping strategies of occupational stress among nurses working in a secondary care and tertiary hospital in Ghana. METHODS: We conducted a health facility-based cross-sectional study among 248 nurses from two hospitals (Volta Regional Hospital [VRH] and Ho Teaching Hospital [HTH]). The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and Weiman Occupational Stress Scale (WOSS) were used to measure the nurses' stress levels and causes of occupational stress respectively. A self-reported checklist was used to measure both the effects of stress and strategies. Descriptive analyses and t-tests were performed, and statistical significance was measured at the 0.05 level. RESULTS: The majority of nurses 77.8% experienced a moderate level of perceived stress. The total individual mean scores of the nurses from the two hospitals (VRH = 3.02 and HTH = 3.09) were 34% and 37% respectively higher than the established WOSS individual average of 2.25. Nursing difficult patients (t=-1.1196, p = 0.037), Unfriendly relationships with superiors, colleagues, and subordinates (t=-2.3333, p = 0.020), working with incompetent staff (t=-1.3129, p = 0.037) were the statistically significant stressors among nurses in the HTH. Whereas, long work hours (t = 2.0841, p = 0.038) and needle-stick injuries (t = 2.6669, p = 0.008) were the statistically significant stressors among nurses from the VRH. Headache (VRH = 73.8% and HTH = 97.9%), Fatigue (VRH = 68.9% and HTH = 83.5%), Frustration VRH = 50.5% and HTH = 68.3%) and Lack of Concentration (VRH = 81.6% and HTH = 80.0%) were most common effects of occupational stress reported. CONCLUSION: The majority of nurses reported moderate levels of stress, with the two institutions' stressors differing. Key causes of stress were needle stick injuries, long hours, dealing with challenging patients and strained interpersonal relationships. Common side effects were headaches, exhaustion, irritability, and trouble focusing. To accelerate progress towards achieving the sustainable development goal (SDG) 3.4 of promoting mental health and well-being by 2030, the 2012 Mental Health Act of Ghana and the Occupational Health and Safety Regulations, should fully and effectively be implemented in health facilities across the country.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Estrés Laboral , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Ghana/epidemiología , Femenino , Adulto , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Masculino , Hospitales Públicos , Adaptación Psicológica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Prevalencia
14.
Nurs Open ; 11(8): e70004, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39166300

RESUMEN

AIM: To determine the occurrence of occupational stress among Palestinian nurses, and their associated sources and risk factors. DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive design. METHODS: A total of 250 registered nurses from eight governmental hospitals, using a convenience sampling method. Data collection were conducted using the 30-items self-reported Occupational Stress Scale from December 2022 to March 2023. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple linear regression analysis were applied to analysis data. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of high occupational stress levels was 64.8% (Mean = 3.9 out of 5). The main sources of stress are too much responsibility and work, understaffing, lack of promotion and recognition, inadequate pay, time pressure, and management style. The results regression analysis demonstrated that male nurses with a Masters or PhD degree and those working in fixed shifts experienced higher occupational stress. Moreover, participants who worked overtime hours were more susceptible to stress. CONCLUSIONS: The research indicates that occupational stress presents a notable challenge for nurses in the Gaza Strip, Palestine. It suggests that in order to alleviate this stress, decision-makers in healthcare policy and hospital management should prioritize the execution of strategies aimed at addressing the primary stressors and risk factors identified. REPORTING METHOD: This study adhered to the STROBE guidelines. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A total of 250 registered nurses were taken part in this study by answering a self-administered study survey.


Asunto(s)
Estrés Laboral , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Medio Oriente/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Árabes/estadística & datos numéricos , Árabes/psicología , Prevalencia , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología
15.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0309028, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39146312

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nursing professional is one of the most stressful jobs, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. When caring for COVID-19 patients, nurses face challenging conditions and limited resources, as well as the fear of infecting themselves and their families, putting them at risk for depression, anxiety, and insomnia. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency, sources, and risk factors for occupational stress among clinical nurses caring for COVID-19 patients in a Vietnamese tertiary hospital. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among all clinical nurses (184 nurses) at a tertiary hospital in Vietnam from March 15 to April 15, 2021. A questionnaire was used for collecting data. Data analysis was done by descriptive statistics, bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions. Risk factors were identified by adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval and P values less than 0.05. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 89.7% (165/184) of clinical nurses. Most participants were female (85.5%) and ≤ 40 years old (97.6%). Overall, participants reported a medium stress level with an Extended Nursing Stress Scale (ENSS) mean score of 1.79 points, and 32.1% had occupational stress. Prevalence of occupational stress among participants caring for COVID-19 patients (34.0%) was not statistically significant difference with that among those who did not (29.4%). Nurses' occupational stress in emergency and intensive care units (50.0%) was substantially higher than that in the other departments (11.7%). The most stressors for participants were difficulties connected to inadequate emotional preparedness, patients and families, and death and dying, with subscale mean scores of 1.97, 1.88, and 1.88 points, respectively. In multivariate analysis, working at an emergency and intensive care unit (OR 4.97), usually or more frequently feeling heavy duty for patients (OR 3.17), and income decrease (OR 3.03) were risk factors associated with occupational stress. CONCLUSION: One-third of clinical nurses at a tertiary hospital experienced occupational stress, with highest rate occurred at emergency and intensive care units. Nurses' working conditions at emergency and intensive care units should be essentially addressed to improve nurses' occupational stress.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Estrés Laboral , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/enfermería , Adulto , Vietnam/epidemiología , Masculino , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Prevalencia , Pueblos del Sudeste Asiático
16.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 877, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090650

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Turnover intention is considered a significant challenge for healthcare and treatment organizations. The challenging conditions of treating COVID-19 patients and the physical and mental stress imposed on nurses during the pandemic may lead them to leave their jobs. The present study aimed to determine the role of psychological factors (general health, mental workload, work-family conflicts, and resilience) on turnover intention using a Bayesian approach during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The present cross-sectional study was carried out during the winter of 2021 at three hospitals in Khuzestan Province, Iran. To collect data for this investigation, 300 nurses were chosen based on Cochran's formula and random sampling technique. Seven questionnaires, including General Health, Mental Workload, Work-Family Conflict, Resilience, Job Stress, Fear of COVID-19, and Turnover Intention Questionnaires. Bayesian Networks (BNs) were used to draw probabilistic and graphical models. A sensitivity analysis also was performed to study the effects of the variables. The GeNIe academic software, version 2.3, facilitated the examination of the Bayesian network. RESULTS: The statistically significant associations occurred between the variables of fear of COVID-19 and job stress (0.313), job stress and turnover intention (0.302), and resilience and job stress (0.298), respectively. Job stress had the highest association with the fear of COVID-19 (0.313), and resilience had the greatest association with the work-family conflict (0.296). Also, the association between turnover intention and job stress (0.302) was higher than the association between this variable and resilience (0.219). At the low resilience and high job stress with the probability of 100%, the turnover intention variable increased by 20%, while at high resilience and low job stress with the probability of 100%, turnover intention was found to decrease by 32%. CONCLUSION: In general, the results showed that four psychological factors affect job turnover intention. However, the greatest impact was related to job stress and resilience. These results can be used to manage job turnover intention in medical environments, especially in critical situations such as COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Teorema de Bayes , COVID-19 , Intención , Pandemias , Reorganización del Personal , Humanos , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Reorganización del Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Irán/epidemiología , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Resiliencia Psicológica , Carga de Trabajo/psicología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Satisfacción en el Trabajo
17.
Am J Audiol ; 33(3): 756-767, 2024 Sep 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963786

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Occupational stress is known to have detrimental effects on health care professionals worldwide. This study aimed to address a research gap by investigating sources and levels of occupational stress in U.K. audiologists. METHOD: A mixed-methods cross-sectional design and convenience sampling were utilized. The study used the Audiologist Occupational Stress Questionnaire (AOSQ) and an audiological working practices questionnaire. The study included 100 registered U.K. audiologists. RESULTS: The research revealed that over a third of participants reported experiencing moderate or higher levels of occupational stress. Pediatric audiologists and those with a high daily patient load reported significantly higher stress scores than other specialties and those seeing fewer patients per day. Identified sources of stress for U.K. audiologists included clinical demands and time constraints, staffing issues, leadership in the workplace, and equipment availability. Reported impacts of stress encompassed mental health issues, fatigue, social life disruptions, and physical health concerns. CONCLUSIONS: The research validated the use of the AOSQ in a U.K. setting, and the findings provided insights into the sources and levels of occupational stress experienced by U.K. audiologists, supporting existing research on occupational stress in audiologists in other countries. The identification of consistent stress themes across the literature underscores the need for targeted support and interventions to ensure the well-being of audiologists and empower them in maintaining their pivotal role in health care.


Asunto(s)
Audiólogos , Estrés Laboral , Humanos , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Reino Unido , Femenino , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Persona de Mediana Edad , Audiología , Carga de Trabajo
18.
J Occup Environ Med ; 66(9): e430-e434, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39016288

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Health care workers (HCW) experienced significant stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. This qualitative study describes how they contextualized the experience several years later. METHODS: In August 2023, 1832 HCW at an academic medical center completed a confidential electronic survey; 443 of them responded to an open-ended question about their experiences during the pandemic. The statements were analyzed qualitatively, using a grounded theory approach to allow themes to emerge from the data. RESULTS: Common themes included fear/anxiety (22%), burnout (15%), protecting family from risk (11%), lack of employer support (11%), fear of illness (8%), increased appreciation for life (8%), and exposure to death/illness (5%). CONCLUSION: HCW experienced substantial stress during the pandemic. Mental health services and structural changes in the health care system are needed to protect HCW during future public health emergencies.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Investigación Cualitativa , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Miedo , Pandemias , Ansiedad , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Estrés Laboral/psicología
19.
Eval Health Prof ; 47(3): 304-318, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39025828

RESUMEN

The primary goal of the present study is to inspect the plausible job-related (i.e., challenge stressors and role blurring) and individual factors (i.e., fatigue and insomnia) that potentially lead to work-related cognitive failures among healthcare staff. Through the judgmental sampling technique, data was collected from healthcare personnel in Iran. The results revealed that challenge stressors in the form of time pressure, job responsibility, and work overload are significantly related to role blurring. Moreover, role blurring increases fatigue and insomnia among medical staff, and both insomnia and fatigue cause workplace cognitive failure. The results also confirm the mediation effect of role blurring in the association between challenge stressors, insomnia, and fatigue. According to the results, insomnia and fatigue similarly mediate the role blurring on workplace cognitive failure association. Theoretical implications, useful suggestions for practitioners, and prospective research avenues are debated in the study.


Asunto(s)
Fatiga , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Lugar de Trabajo , Humanos , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/psicología , Irán , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Carga de Trabajo/psicología , Cognición , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estrés Psicológico
20.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health ; 37(3): 287-299, 2024 Sep 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38975635

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess the mental health and well-being of Lithuanian healthcare workers by gathering demographic information, identifying common stressors affecting the work environment, evaluating mental health, and exploring directions for psychosocial care. Additionally, the research explored the prevalence of considering a career change among respondents. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 1618 responders who completed an online survey in December 2021 - January 2022. Participants included in this study: physicians, nurses, residents and other healthcare workers. It evaluated their demographics, most common stressors affecting their work environment and mental health on the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 (DASS-21) scale. Lastly, all responders asked if they had considered changing their occupation to a non-medical job. Univariate analysis was performed using χ2 and Student's t test, and binary logistic regression evaluated career change predictors. RESULTS: Career change was considered by 1081 (66.8%) responders. The main career change predictors were poor working conditions (OR 1.91, p < 0.001), direct contact with patients (OR 1.84, p < 0.001), lack of career perspectives (OR 1.95, p < 0.001), mobbing (OR 1.67, p = 0.001) and exhaustion (OR 1.51, p = 0.005). After evaluating DASS-21 scores, it was found that 23% of respondents had severe and extremely severe depression symptoms, 27.4% severe and extremely severe anxiety, and 21.4% had severe and extremely severe stress levels. CONCLUSIONS: Lithuanian healthcare workers are in high distress and have poor mental health. They are in need psychosocial assistance to avoid burnout and staff loss. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2024;37(3):287-99.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Estrés Laboral , Humanos , Lituania/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Personal de Salud/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Distrés Psicológico , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Selección de Profesión , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA