RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy, a cornerstone treatment for childhood cancers, can negatively impact oral health. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and evolution of oral complications in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study enrolled 44 children diagnosed with malignancy undergoing chemotherapy at a tertiary care institute in central India. Oral examinations were performed at baseline, with follow-ups at 3-6 and 9-12 months. Data collected included demographics, medical history, oral hygiene practices, and oral lesions. Blood counts and World Health Organization grading for mucositis were used. Descriptive statistics and appropriate statistical tests analyzed the data (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was the most prevalent malignancy. Children reported various oral complaints such as ulcers, bleeding gums, and difficulty eating. Mucositis prevalence significantly decreased over follow-up visits (baseline: 56.8% and second follow-up: 13.3%). Gingival inflammation was present, though mean scores decreased over time. Oral hygiene scores varied without significant changes. Caries experience scores increased from baseline to follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study identified a high prevalence of ALL and diverse oral complications in children undergoing chemotherapy. While mucositis severity lessened over time, other issues such as caries persisted. These findings highlight the critical need for preventive oral care strategies to safeguard this vulnerable population's oral health.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , India/epidemiología , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Boca/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Boca/inducido químicamente , Prevalencia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/complicaciones , Higiene Bucal , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Adolescente , Caries Dental/epidemiología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the severity of oral mucositis and the contributing factors among cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS: This study was planned cross-sectional. The study was conducted at a medical oncology clinic between January and July 2022. The sample consisted of 245 patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Data were collected using a personal, oral health and disease-related characteristics questionnaire and the World Health Organization Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale by researchers. Intraoral examination of the patients was carried out by researchers. The data were analyzed by independent-sample t-tests, Chi-square tests, paired-sample t-tests, and multivariate logistic regression (p < 0,05). RESULTS: The patients had mean age 62.31 ± 10.70. Patients of 32.7% were with lung cancer. 52%of the patients (n = 128) receiving chemotherapy developed oral mucositis. The independent variables the presence chronic disease(OR:1.85), chemotherapy protocol (OR:3.52) and the dependent variables ECOG performance score (OR:2.25) were variable that affected the development of oral mucositis (p < 0.05). Patients of 35.5% were oral mucositis score of 1. Patients those who had breast cancer, who received doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide chemotherapy protocols, and who had previously developed oral mucositis were found to have a higher rate of oral mucositis (p < 0.05). In addition, oral mucositis was more prevalent in patients with chronic diseases other than cancer (57%), those who used medication continuously (57.2%), those with oral and dental diseases (56.9%), those who had dental check-ups before cancer treatment (79.2%), and those who had information about oral mucositis(70.2%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, nearly half of the patients (52%, n = 128) receiving chemotherapy developed oral mucositis and of all patients of 35.5% had an oral mucositis score of 1 in the second round of chemotherapy. Patients those who had breast cancer, who received doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide chemotherapy protocols, and who had previously developed oral mucositis were found to have a higher rate of oral mucositis.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Estomatitis , Humanos , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Anciano , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Modelos LogísticosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Anthracycline-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel-containing chemotherapy is effective for perioperative breast cancer treatment. However, these treatments frequently induce oral mucositis (OM), with an incidence ranging from 20 to 50%. The association of OM development between different chemotherapeutic treatments remains unclear. Consequently, this study aimed to compare OM development during docetaxel-containing chemotherapy between patients with and without OM experience during previous anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatments to assess the association between OM development and treatment regimens. METHODS: Seventy-two patients with breast cancer receiving anthracycline-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel-containing chemotherapy as a perioperative treatment were categorized into the control (no prior OM experience with anthracycline-cyclophosphamide) and OM-experience (OM development during previous treatment) groups and retrospectively evaluated. The primary endpoint was the incidence of all-grade OM in the first docetaxel-containing chemotherapy cycle. Additionally, the incidences of OM and dysgeusia during all treatment cycles and factors associated with the incidence of OM were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of all-grade OM in the first cycle was significantly higher in the OM-experience group (54.2%) than in the control group (10.4%; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, its incidence in all treatment cycles was higher in the OM-experience group (66.7%) than in the control group (12.5%, P < 0.0001). However, the incidence of dysgeusia did not differ between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed OM experience during previous anthracycline-cyclophosphamide treatment and concomitant pertuzumab use as independent risk factors for OM development in subsequent docetaxel-containing chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that patients experiencing OM with anthracycline-cyclophosphamide during perioperative breast cancer treatment exhibit symptoms following subsequent docetaxel-containing chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Antraciclinas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias de la Mama , Ciclofosfamida , Docetaxel , Estomatitis , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Antraciclinas/efectos adversos , Antraciclinas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Incidencia , Taxoides/efectos adversos , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis significantly compromises the quality of life for patients undergoing cancer therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of natural products in either preventing or alleviating oral mucositis resulting from cancer treatments. METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted, sourcing data from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Airiti Library, and Wan Fang Data Knowledge Service Platform until August 2023. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021285433). Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) and R software 4.1.3 were used for analysis. RESULTS: From 1556 identified articles, 36 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were analyzed, involving 2083 patients. Honey, notably, was found to significantly reduce the overall incidence of oral mucositis compared to standard care, with a relative risk (RR) of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.67-0.96). It was particularly effective against moderate-to-severe oral mucositis (grade ≥ 2), reducing incidence with RR of 0.48 (95% CI: 0.30-0.75) versus placebo and 0.56 (95% CI: 0.34-0.93) against standard care. Other natural products, including propolis, chamomile, and P. major L., also demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing the incidence of oral mucositis. Regarding pain relief, honey, and P. major L. emerged as effective, significantly reducing pain severity with a mean difference (MD) of -2.96 (95% CI: -3.80 to -1.94) compared to placebo. CONCUSSION: This network meta-analysis supports the use of honey, propolis, chamomile, and P. major L. as effective natural products in the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis among cancer patients. Specifically, honey is highlighted for its significant impact on reducing both the overall incidence and the severity of moderate-to-severe oral mucositis. By leveraging their anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, integrating these natural products into the standard care regimen could markedly improve the well-being of individuals undergoing cancer therapy.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Neoplasias , Metaanálisis en Red , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estomatitis , Humanos , Estomatitis/prevención & control , Estomatitis/etiología , Estomatitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Miel , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis is an inflammatory condition of oral cavity which is a common and serious side effect of cancer treatment. Severe oral mucositis compromises basic functions like eating and swallowing causing malnutrition also affecting overall patient's oral health related quality of life. The aim of the study was to find the frequency of oral mucositis in patients with breast cancer during their chemotherapy, the factors associated with oral mucositis & the overall patient's oral health related quality of life. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted and a total of 160 women diagnosed with breast cancer, receiving chemotherapy and who had undergone at least one cycle of chemotherapy were recruited from two hospital settings. In-person interviews were done, patients were asked questions about their sociodemographic history, personal habits, oral history and oral findings, breast cancer stage, chemotherapy history and Oral Health Related Quality of Life. Their oral examination was done at the end of the interview to assess presence or absence of oral mucositis, using World Health Organization oral mucositis tool. Oral Health Related Quality of Life was assessed using Oral Health Impact Profile-14 questionnaire. RESULTS: Our results showed that out of 160 patients 88 (55%) of the breast cancer cases developed oral mucositis during chemotherapy. The mean Oral Health Impact Profile -14 scores in patients with oral mucositis was high 18.36±0.96 showing poor Oral Health Related Quality of Life. Occasional frequency of brushing was significantly associated with oral mucositis (Prevalence ratio:2.26, 95%_CI 1.06-4.84) compared to those patients who brushed once and twice daily. Low level of education showed negative association with oral mucositis (Prevalence ratio:0.52, 95%_CI 0.31-0.88). CONCLUSION: Our study showed significant positive association of occasional brushing with OM and protective association of low level of education with the development of OM. Emphasis should be given to oral hygiene instructions and dental education to cancer patients in oncology clinics with the prescription of mouth washes, gels and toothpaste to patients to decrease OM during chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Estomatitis , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Transversales , Pakistán/epidemiología , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Estomatitis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Many patients experience oral adverse events during head and neck cancer radiotherapy (RT). The methods of management of such events are under debate. One such technique is the intraoral stent (IOS) technique, which removes normal tissue from the irradiation field. This retrospective study examined the factors associated with the occurrence of oral mucositis (OM) and dysgeusia and the efficacy of IOSs in preventing them. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients who underwent RT in the maxilla or nasal cavity between 2016 and 2022 were included. They were investigated for background characteristics, treatment factors (IOS and dose-volume histogram), and oral adverse events (OM and dysgeusia). RESULTS: Significant risk factors for the incidence of grade ≥ 2 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0) OM were the non-use of IOSs (p = 0.004) and diabetes (p = 0.025). A significant risk factor for the incidence of grade ≥ 1 dysgeusia was concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.019). The radiation dose to the tongue was significantly lower in the IOS group than in the non-IOS group. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the use of an IOS during RT reduces the severity of OM by reducing irradiation to the tongue. Therefore, the use of an IOS is recommended during RT performed in the maxilla or nasal cavity.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Estomatitis , Humanos , Maxilar , Disgeusia/epidemiología , Disgeusia/etiología , Disgeusia/prevención & control , Cavidad Nasal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Estomatitis/etiología , Estomatitis/prevención & controlRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Anticancer drug-induced stomatitis can affect a patient's quality of life and the continuation of drug treatment. Although there have been reports of the occurrence of stomatitis associated with anticancer agents in clinical trials, few Japanese participants have been enrolled in clinical trials and have not been sufficiently investigated. In addition, there has been little attention on research on anticancer drugs associated with stomatitis by patient stratification with different carcinogenic sites. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the disproportionality associated with stomatitis for various types of anticancer drugs in different types of cancer patients using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. METHODS: The aim of this study was to identify the disproportionality of stomatitis by analyzing the type of anticancer drug and cancer patients using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database. Data obtained from spontaneous reports of adverse events with more than 10 stomatitis outbreaks reported in the JADER database between April 2004 and March 2023 were analyzed. The safety signal for an adverse event was defined as the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of the reported odds ratio of >1. RESULTS: There were 6,178 reports of drugs associated with stomatitis. Among these, 41 drugs were suggested to be associated with stomatitis, and 41 drugs were detected as signals. These drugs were classified based on their efficacy: antipyrimidines (six drugs), folate metabolism antagonists (three drugs), alkylating agents (four drugs), platinum (three drugs), topoisomerase inhibitors (three drugs), microtubule inhibitors (three drugs), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (two drugs), kinase inhibitors (seven drugs), anti-growth factor antibodies (five drugs) immune checkpoint inhibitors (one drug), and others (four drugs). CONCLUSION: The drugs that may be associated with stomatitis were cell cycle-dependent drugs, epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and mTOR inhibitors. Moreover, this study suggested that anti-growth factor antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors may be associated with stomatitis development.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Antineoplásicos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Farmacovigilancia , Estomatitis , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Japón/epidemiología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Estomatitis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
After completing treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC), patients often face oral complications like oral pain, limited mouth opening and dry mouth which significantly reduce their oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL). These issues impact their overall well-being, social activities and long-term survival. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate OHRQoL and its association with sociodemographic characteristics, oral hygiene practices and oral clinical parameters such as oral hygiene status and oral mucositis grade in patients who have completed treatment for head and neck cancer. This cross-sectional study involved 79 HNC-treated patients within first year after completion of cancer treatment attending ENT and dental clinics at outpatient department (OPD) setting in Karachi. Data was collected electronically using structured questionnaire comprising of EORTC QLQ H&N - 35 to measure OHRQoL, patients were also examined for oral hygiene status using oral hygiene index- simplified (OHI-s) and oral mucositis grade using WHO oral mucositis scale. Multiple linear regression was used to test OHRQoL associations with the sociodemographic and different clinical factors. The result showed an overall mean score for oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL) of 25.02 ± 15.86 (95% CI 21.46-28.57), with difficulty in mouth opening 53.16 ± 18.88 and dry mouth 45.14 ± 24.48 being predominant concerns for decline in the OHRQoL in the population. Male predilection was observed among participants n = 60 (75.9%), majority of the participants n = 41 (51.9%) were below 52 years of age. n = 63 (80%) participants received radiotherapy alongside surgery and chemotherapy. Most of participants n = 66 (83.5%) experienced moderate to severe oral mucositis with poor oral hygiene status n = 56 (71%). Significant associations were found between OHRQoL and BMI, OH status, marital status, monthly income, gender and fluoride toothpaste (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that Quality of Life (QoL) among HNC treated patients is negatively impacted by their poor oral health, post cancer treatment. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and modify the current treatment modalities and involve multidisciplinary teams, to improve their OHRQoL thereby enhancing overall QoL.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Estomatitis , Xerostomía , Humanos , Masculino , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Transversales , Pakistán/epidemiología , Salud Bucal , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Estomatitis/etiología , Sobrevivientes , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy is a common treatment for cancer, but it is associated with adverse drug reactions like oral mucositis. This condition destroys basal cells in the oral mucosal layer, causing inflammation and ulceration. This can impact the patient's physical, emotional, and psychological well-being, affecting treatment outcomes and quality of life. This study aims to determine the prevalence, severity, and risk factors of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis among adult cancer patients. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional study conducted among adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy at the cancer unit of Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in southwestern Uganda. Data was collected through patient interviews, oral examinations, and patient chart reviews. RESULTS: Out of 268 patients, 115 (42.9%) experienced oral mucositis. Grade 2 oral mucositis was the most common (44.3%) followed by grade 1 (35.7%) and grade 3 (20.0%). Independent risk factors of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis were female gender (Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) = 2.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-3.78; p-value = 0.005), poor oral hygiene (AOR = 3.70, 95% CI: 1.51-9.10; p-value = 0.04), and receiving chemotherapy containing an alkylating agent (AOR = 3.17, 95% CI: 1.63-6.19; p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study found that two out of five chemotherapy patients developed oral mucositis, with nearly half being grade 2. The risk factors identified in our study were comparable to those reported in previous studies. Therefore, identification and assessment of cancer patients at high risk for chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis should be routinely done for proper and timely management.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Estomatitis , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Prevalencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Uganda/epidemiología , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Anciano , Adulto Joven , AdolescenteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Concerns regarding contact allergies and intolerance reactions to dental materials are widespread among patients. Development of novel dental materials and less frequent amalgam use may alter sensitization profiles in patients with possible contact allergy. OBJECTIVES: To analyse current sensitization patterns to dental materials in patients with suspected contact allergy. METHODS: This retrospective, multicentre analysis from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) selected participants from 169 834 people tested in 2005-2019 and registered with (i) an affected area of 'mouth' (and 'lips'/'perioral'), (ii) with the dental material in question belonging to one of three groups (dental filling materials, oral implants or dentures or equivalents) and (iii) with patch-testing done in parallel with the German baseline series, (dental) metal series and dental technician series. RESULTS: A total of 2730 of 169 834 tested patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients were predominantly women (81.2%) aged ≥ 40â years (92.8%). The sensitization rates with confirmed allergic contact stomatitis in women (n = 444) were highest for metals (nickel 28.6%, palladium 21.4%, amalgam 10.9%), (meth)acrylates [2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) 4.8%] and the substances propolis (6.8%) and 'balsam of Peru' (11.4%). The most relevant acrylates were HEMA, 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate, methyl methacrylate, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate and pentaerythritol triacrylate. Few men were diagnosed with allergic contact stomatitis (n = 68); sensitization rates in men were highest for propolis (14.9%) and amalgam (13.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Allergic contact stomatitis to dental materials is rare. Patch testing should not only focus on metals such as nickel, palladium, amalgam and gold, but also (meth)acrylates and the natural substances propolis and 'balsam of Peru'.
Asunto(s)
Amalgama Dental , Materiales Dentales , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Pruebas del Parche , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Materiales Dentales/efectos adversos , Amalgama Dental/efectos adversos , Anciano , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Niño , Metacrilatos/efectos adversos , Bálsamos/efectos adversos , Implantes Dentales/efectos adversos , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Estomatitis/inmunología , Estomatitis/diagnóstico , Estomatitis/etiología , Própolis/efectos adversos , Dentaduras/efectos adversos , Alemania/epidemiología , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/inmunología , PreescolarRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Oral mucositis is a common complication for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and causes pain and difficulties in functions like eating and swallowing, resulting in lower quality of life and greater need of treatment with opioids and parenteral nutrition. This prospective multicenter study focused on pediatric recipients of HSCT in the neutropenic phase concerning oral complications, timing, severity, and patient experience. METHODS: The cohort comprised 68 patients, median age 11.1 years (IQR 6.3) receiving allogeneic HSCT at three clinical sites. Medical records were retrieved for therapy regimens, concomitant medications, oral and dental history, and subjective oral complaints. Calibrated dentists conducted an oral and dental investigation before HSCT. After HSCT graft infusion, study personnel made bedside assessments and patients filled out a questionnaire once or twice a week until neutrophil engraftment. RESULTS: We followed 63 patients through the neutropenic phase until engraftment. 50% developed oral mucositis of grades 2-4. Peak severity occurred at 8-11 days after stem cell infusion. Altogether, 87% had subjective oral complaints. The temporal distribution of adverse events is similar to the development of oral mucositis. The most bothersome symptoms were blisters and oral ulcerations, including mucositis; 40% reported severe pain and major impact on activities of daily living despite continuous use of opioids. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the burden of oral complications and their negative effect on the health and quality of life of HSCT recipients.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Estomatitis , Humanos , Niño , Estudios Prospectivos , Incidencia , Calidad de Vida , Actividades Cotidianas , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Estomatitis/etiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Dolor/etiología , Estudios Multicéntricos como AsuntoRESUMEN
Importance: Oral mucositis (OM) is a common and debilitating adverse effect observed in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) receiving radiation therapy (RT). Previous studies examining associations between OM and clinical outcomes were performed in the era of 3-dimensional conformal RT planning with low rates of concurrent chemotherapy, and thus may not reflect current practice. Objective: To prospectively assess patient-reported OM and identify its associations with clinical outcomes and quality of life. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study performed at a single institution included 702 consecutive patients who underwent definitive or adjuvant intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) for primary HNC from February 9, 2015, to May 27, 2022. Data were analyzed from November 28, 2022, to August 18, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Severity of OM was assessed based on highest reported mouth and throat soreness (MTS) score during radiotherapy according to the Oral Mucositis Weekly Questionnaire-Head and Neck Cancer survey, which was administered weekly during IMRT. Linear mixed models were used to compare mean MTS scores grouped by disease site and chemotherapy regimen. Fisher exact tests and 1-way analysis of variance tests were performed to identify associations between severity of OM and clinical outcomes. Results: Among 576 eligible patients, the median age was 62.5 (IQR, 56.3-69.1) years, and 451 patients (78.3%) were men. In terms of race and ethnicity, 6 patients (1.0%) were American Indian or Alaska Native; 2 (0.3%), Asian; 31 (5.4%), Black; 8 (1.4%), Hispanic or Latino; 509 (88.4%), White; and 28 (4.9%), unknown. The most common treatment site was oropharynx (268 [46.5%]), and most patients received concurrent chemotherapy (464 [80.6%]). By the end of treatment, 360 patients (62.5%) developed severe OM and 568 (98.6%) developed some degree of OM. Linear mixed models found no significant differences in OM between HNC disease sites. Groups with greater highest severity of OM reported had higher rates of measured outcomes (listed respectively by MTS score 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4): feeding tube placement (0%, 3.6% [2 of 56], 6.6% [10 of 152], 14.7% [40 of 272], and 21.6% [19 of 88]; P = .001), hospitalization (12.5% [1 of 8], 10.7% [6 of 56], 15.1% [23 of 152], 23.9% [65 of 272], and 28.4% [25 of 88]; P = .02), opiate use (0%, 19.6% [11 of 56], 42.8%[65 of 152], 61.4% [167 of 272], and 64.8% [57 of 88]; P < .001) and experienced greater weight loss (median, -0.7 [IQR, -1.7 to -0.4] kg; median, 3.9 [IQR, 1.1 to 6.1] kg; median, 5.0 [IQR, 2.2 to 7.7] kg; median, 4.7 [IQR, 2.1 to 7.7] kg; and median, 7.7 [IQR, 2.8 to 10.6] kg; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with HNC, 62.5% developed severe OM. Higher severity of OM was associated with feeding tube placement, hospitalization, opiate use, and weight loss. Improvements in OM prevention and management are needed.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Alcaloides Opiáceos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Estomatitis , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Estomatitis/etiología , Estomatitis/prevención & control , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This research aims to assess the prevalence of peri-implant diseases and to analyze variables of the probable risk at the patient level associated with the occurrence of peri-implant diseases in Syrian patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study has been carried out on 142 patients with 380 dental implants placed between 2015 and 2021. Patients were invited by phone to return to Damascus University's Periodontology Department for clinical and radiological examination. A descriptive statistical analysis was implemented for the prevalence of peri-implant diseases at the level of the patients. Also, the peri-implant diseases' factors of risk were determined by the multivariate analytical model. RESULTS: The prevalence rate of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis in patients was 58.5% and 25.4%, respectively. Peri-implant disease is associated with multivariate risk indices, gender female (peri-implant mucositis [OR = 0.269; 95% CI: 0.131-0.552] and peri-implantitis [OR = 0.561; 95% CI: 0.561-0.216]), diabetes (peri-implant mucositis [OR = 3.4; 95% CI: 1.73-12.73]), periodontitis (peri-implant mucositis [OR = 2.409; 95% CI: 1.760-2.613], peri-implantitis [OR = 10.445; 95% CI: 4.097-26.629]). CONCLUSIONS: Peri-implant diseases are common in the Syrian community. Several patient-level variables (gender female, diabetes, and periodontitis) are associated with peri-implant disease.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Diabetes Mellitus , Mucositis , Periimplantitis , Periodontitis , Estomatitis , Humanos , Femenino , Periimplantitis/epidemiología , Periimplantitis/etiología , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Implantes Dentales/efectos adversos , Mucositis/inducido químicamente , Estudios Transversales , Siria/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Periodontitis/complicacionesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The study aimed to characterize the incidence of both oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis, its' associated temporal changes in local and systemic pro-inflammatory cytokines, and to explore predictive clinical and immunological factors associated with their occurrences in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). METHODS: Autologous HSCT patients aged 18 years old and above were recruited from Hospital Ampang, Malaysia, between April 2019 to December 2020. Mucositis assessments were conducted daily, whilst blood and saliva were collected prior to conditioning regimen, on Day 0, Day+7 and 6-month. Baseline and inflammatory predictors in a repeated time measurement of moderate-severe mucositis were assessed by multiple logistic regression and generalized estimating equations, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 142 patients analyzed, oral mucositis and diarrhea (representing GI mucositis) were reported as 68.3% and 95.8%, respectively. Predictive factors for moderate-severe oral mucositis were BEAM or busulphan-based regimens (odds ratio (OR)=9.2, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.16-72.9, p-value (p) = 0.005) and vomiting (OR=4.6, 95% CI 1.68-12.3, p = 0.004). Predictive factors for moderate-severe GI mucositis were BEAM or busulphan-based regimens (OR=3.9, 95% CI 1.05-14.5, p = 0.023), female sex (OR = 3.3, 95% CI 1.43-7.44, p = 0.004) and body mass index (OR=1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.15, p = 0.010). Cytokines analyses were performed in 96 patients. Saliva and plasma interleukin-6 (OR=1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.004, p < 0.001 and OR=1.01, 95% CI 1.001-1.015, p = 0.029), and plasma tumor necrosis factor-alpha (OR=0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.99, p = 0.019) were predictive of moderate-severe oral mucositis in a time-dependent model. CONCLUSION: This study provides real-world evidence and insights into patient- and treatment-related factors affecting oral and GI mucositis in HSCT.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mucositis , Estomatitis , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Adolescente , Mucositis/epidemiología , Mucositis/etiología , Busulfano , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Estomatitis/etiología , Citocinas , Trasplante de Células Madre/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Inmunológicos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to determine whether oral and dental hygiene protocols (DHPs) reduce the incidence and severity of oral mucositis (OM) during antineoplastic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD42021295322) was based on searches of publicly accessible databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, EBSCOhost, LIVIVO, Embase, and gray literature (Google Scholar, ProQuest, and Energy) until December 2021. Twenty-five articles from these searches and 14 articles retrieved from the references therein were evaluated in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using RoB-2 and ROBINS-I for randomized (RCT) and non-randomized (n-RCT) clinical trials, respectively. A meta-analysis was performed on RCTs and n-RCTs in two subgroups to evaluate oral mouth rinses or DHP. GRADE-pro was used to assess the degree of certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: Of the 3367 articles retrieved, 25 RCTs and 14 n-RCTs involving 2109 and 754 patients, respectively, were included in the analyses. RoB was low for RCTs and moderate-to-very severe for n-RCTs. High heterogeneity and publication RoB were identified. In RCTs, mouth rinses (p = 0.830) and DHP (p = 0.100) did not reduce the incidence of OM. However, mouth rinses strongly reduced the severity of OM (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = - 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = - 2.49 to - 1.24). In non-RCTs, mouth rinses (p < 0.001) and DHP (p < 0.001) reduced the relative risk of OM 0.38 (95% CI = 0.24 to 0.59) and 0.64 (95% CI = 0.53 to 0.70) times, respectively. In addition, DHP strongly reduced OM severity (Cohen's d = - 0.81, 95% CI = - 1.03 to - 0.59). GRADE-pro showed high certainty of OM severity and incidence in RCTs and non-RCTs, respectively, and low (OM incidence in RCTs) to very low (OM severity in non-RCTs) certainty in other outcomes. CONCLUSION: DHPs strongly reduce the severity and moderately reduce the incidence of OM. However, further studies with low heterogeneity are needed to validate these findings.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Higiene Bucal , Estomatitis , Humanos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Antisépticos Bucales/uso terapéutico , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Estomatitis/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Mucositis is a frequent and severe complication in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The effectiveness of probiotics in mucositis has been indicated by several clinical trials, but the results are still controversial. To date, studies on the influence of probiotics in HSCT are limited. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective study to evaluate the impact of viable Bifidobacterium tablets on the incidence and duration of chemotherapy-/radiation-induced mucositis in patients undergoing HSCT. METHODS: Clinical data of 278 patients who underwent HSCT between May 2020 and November 2021 were retrospectively analysed. They were divided into a control group (138) and a probiotic group (140) according to whether they took viable Bifidobacterium tablets. First, we analysed the baseline data of the two groups. Then, we compared the incidence, severity and duration of mucositis between the two groups by using Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test according to the type of data. In order to exclude the influence of confounding factors, we further evaluated the efficacy of oral probiotics in preventing oral mucositis by Binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The use of viable Bifidobacterium tablets markedly reduced the incidence of oral mucositis (OM) (62.9% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.001) and mainly reduced the incidence of grades 1-2 OM (74.6% vs. 58.6%, p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the incidence of severe (grades 3-4) OM between the two groups (6.5% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.409). The median duration of OM was shorter in the probiotic group (10 vs. 12 days, p = 0.037). The incidence and duration of diarrhoea did not differ between the two groups. Moreover, the use of viable Bifidobacterium tablets had no influence on engraftment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that viable Bifidobacterium tablets could effectively reduce the incidence of grades 1-2 OM and duration of OM during the transplant process without affecting the outcome of HSCT.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Mucositis , Estomatitis , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mucositis/etiología , Mucositis/prevención & control , Bifidobacterium , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Estomatitis/etiología , Estomatitis/prevención & control , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Due to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, recently, Radiotherapy (RT) protocols requiring fewer sessions (hypofractionated) have been used to shorten RT treatment and minimize patient exposure to medical centers, and decrease the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This longitudinal, prospective, observational study aimed to compare the quality of life (QoL) and the incidence of oral mucositis and candidiasis in 66 patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) who undergo a hypofractionated RT protocol (GHipo), total of 55 Gy for 4 weeks, or a conventional RT protocol (GConv), total of 66 - 70 Gy for 6 - 7 weeks. PURPOSE: To assess the incidence and severity of oral mucositis, the incidence of candidiasis, and QoL were evaluated using the World Health Organization scale, clinical evaluation, and the QLC-30 and H&N-35 questionnaires, respectively, at the beginning and the end of RT. RESULTS: The incidence of candidiasis did not show differences between the two groups. However, at the end of RT, mucositis had a higher incidence (p < 0.01) and severity (p < 0.05) in GHipo. QoL was not markedly different between the two groups. Although mucositis worsened in patients treated with hypofractionated RT, QoL did not worsen for patients on this regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Our results open perspectives for the potential use of RT protocols for HNC with fewer sessions in conditions that require faster, cheaper, and more practical treatments.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Candidiasis , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Mucositis , Estomatitis , Humanos , Mucositis/complicaciones , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Estomatitis/etiología , Estomatitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Candidiasis/complicaciones , Estudios Observacionales como AsuntoRESUMEN
AIM: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy of risk factor control to prevent the occurrence of peri-implant diseases (PIDs) in adult patients awaiting dental implant rehabilitation (primordial prevention) or in patients with dental implants surrounded by healthy peri-implant tissues (primary prevention). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed without any time limit on different databases up to August 2022. Interventional and observational studies with at least 6 months of follow-up were considered. The occurrence of peri-implant mucositis and/or peri-implantitis was the primary outcome. Pooled data analyses were performed using random effect models according to the type of risk factor and outcome. RESULTS: Overall, 48 studies were selected. None assessed the efficacy of primordial preventive interventions for PIDs. Indirect evidence on the primary prevention of PID indicated that diabetic patients with dental implants and good glycaemic control have a significantly lower risk of peri-implantitis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-0.96; I2 : 0%), and lower marginal bone level (MBL) changes (OR = -0.36 mm; 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.07; I2 : 95%) compared to diabetic patients with poor glycaemic control. Patients attending supportive periodontal/peri-implant care (SPC) regularly have a lower risk of overall PIDs (OR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24-0.75; I2 : 57%) and peri-implantitis compared to irregular attendees. The risk of dental implant failure (OR = 3.76; 95% CI: 1.50-9.45; I2 : 0%) appears to be greater under irregular or no SPC than regular SPC. Implants sites with augmented peri-implant keratinized mucosa (PIKM) show lower peri-implant inflammation (SMD = -1.18; 95% CI: -1.85 to -0.51; I2 : 69%) and lower MBL changes (MD = -0.25; 95% CI: -0.45 to -0.05; I2 : 62%) compared to dental implants with PIKM deficiency. Studies on smoking cessation and oral hygiene behaviors were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of available evidence, the present findings indicate that in patients with diabetes, glycaemic control should be promoted to avoid peri-implantitis development. The primary prevention of peri-implantitis should involve regular SPC. PIKM augmentation procedures, where a PIKM deficiency exists, may favour the control of peri-implant inflammation and the stability of MBL. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of smoking cessation and oral hygiene behaviours, as well as the implementation of standardized primordial and primary prevention protocols for PIDs.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Diabetes Mellitus , Periimplantitis , Estomatitis , Adulto , Humanos , Periimplantitis/prevención & control , Periimplantitis/epidemiología , Implantes Dentales/efectos adversos , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Inflamación , Prevención PrimariaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the prevalence of feline chronic gingivostomatitis in urban feral cats in South Korea and analysed its risk factors. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-five feral cats that visited the hospital for neutering using a trap-neuter-return approach were screened for feline chronic gingivostomatitis based on clinical criteria. In addition, we determined if body weight, sex and the presence of tongue lesions are risk factors for feline chronic gingivostomatitis. The difference in severity due to the presence or absence of risk factors, and the relationship between gross findings and histopathological lesions, were analysed by grading lesion severity. RESULTS: Feline chronic gingivostomatitis was diagnosed in 92 cats. Disease prevalence did not significantly differ with body weight and sex but was significantly related to tongue lesions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The prevalence of feline chronic gingivostomatitis in urban feral cats in South Korea was 26.6%. It was significantly more prevalent in cats that had tongue lesions. Severity was also significantly associated with tongue lesions. Feline chronic gingivostomatitis may be associated with an infectious agent that causes tongue lesions.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Gatos , Estomatitis , Animales , Gatos , Enfermedades de los Gatos/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Estomatitis/complicaciones , Estomatitis/diagnóstico , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Estomatitis/veterinaria , Enfermedades de la Lengua/complicaciones , Enfermedades de la Lengua/veterinariaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The primary endpoint of the present study was to assess the potential therapeutic effects of three different mouthwashes for alleviation and treatment of oral complications (OCs). The secondary endpoint was to assess patients' perceptions and daily functional activities after therapy of OCs in patients with colon cancer receiving 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: A prospective, randomised controlled study carried out on 90 patients with colon cancer eligible for 5-FU-based chemotherapy regimens at the oncology centre, Istanbul, Turkey. Patients were randomly randomised into three groups (30 patients in each group) and received a single mouthwash. The first group (group A) received benzydamine at a dose of 15 mL; the second group (group B) received sodium bicarbonate at a dose of 1.2-2.4 g in 240 mL of water; and the third group (group C) received glutamine suspension 10 g. Patients were assessed for the occurrence of oral complications based on the WHO scale for oral mucosa evaluation and National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Oral pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale alongside assessment of patients' perceptions and daily functional activities based on the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist. RESULTS: A total of 119 oral complications were reported, including mouth dryness (n=56, 47.1%), oral mucositis (n=31, 26.1%) and oral pain (n=32, 26.8%). At the end of the study, patients of group A and group B significantly suffered from mouth dryness (p=0.0001), oral mucositis (p=0.029) and oral pain (p=0.039) compared with patients in group C. Although there was no significant change, group C patients showed a slight improvement in psychological discomfort, activity levels and quality of life at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that benzydamine and sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes were significantly less effective for the alleviation and treatment of oral complications compared with glutamine among patients with colon cancer receiving 5-FU-based chemotherapy regimens.