RESUMEN
UNLABELLED: High pressure of pharyngo-esophageal segment is the most important factor of impaired development of alaryngeal speech (esophageal speech, tracheoesophageal speech) after total laryngectomy. To prevent pharyngo-esophageal spasm in Department of Otolaryngology in Szczecin are used: pharyngoesophageal plastic surgery with interposition of vascular thyroid flap, two-layer (only mucosa) non-muscular pharyngeal closure and tree-layer closure (mucosa and muscle layer leaving inferior pharyngeal constrictor unsutured). AIM OF STUDY: The aim of this study was to compare the pharyngo-esophageal pressure between patients after pharyngo-esophageal plastic surgery and following the non-muscular pharyngeal closure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred eighty two subjects after total laryngectomy were enrolled in this study, and included 108 patients subjected to the pharyngo-esophageal plastic surgery, 44 patients who underwent the two-layer pharyngeal closure, and 30 patients with the tree-layer closure. To evaluate the pharyngo-esophageal pressures manometric tests were performed, and to asses the pharynx morphology videopharyngoscopy was used. RESULTS: The average pharyngo-esophageal pressure in the group after the pharyngo-esophageal plastic surgery was 32 (min.-5, max. 50) mmHg. After the two-layer non-muscular pharyngeal closure mean pressure was 35 (min.-17, max.-40) mmHg, and after the tree-layer non-muscular pharyngeal closure the average pressure was 22,42 (min. 5, max. 40) mmHg. The average pharyngo-esophageal pressure was significantly lower (p < 0.01) among patients after the tree-layer non-muscular closure. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the tree-layer non-muscular pharyngeal closure with inferior pharyngeal constrictor unsutured is the preferable method to prevent pharyngo-esophageal spasm after total laryngectomy. However, the efficacy and safety of this surgical procedure should be explored in further multicenter studies.
Asunto(s)
Laringectomía/métodos , Músculos Faríngeos/cirugía , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Voz Esofágica/métodos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Espasmo Esofágico Difuso/prevención & control , Espasmo Esofágico Difuso/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Presión , Trastornos de la Voz/etiología , Calidad de la Voz , Entrenamiento de la VozRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of pharyngoesophageal spasm and the results of its prevention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This a prospective longitudinal study including two groups of patients: a study group - 69 laryngectomees to undergo spasm prevention surgery, and a control group - 52 laryngectomees. The diagnostic methods used were: esophageal test, double contrast roentgenoscopy; surgical methods: neurectomy of pharyngeal plexus, myotomy of pharyngeal constrictors, no-muscle layer closure of the pharyngeal defect with myotomy of the esophageal entrance. RESULTS: The incidence of pharyngoesophageal spasm in the control and study group was 34.62% and 14.5%, respectively. In the control group the spasm was significantly more common in patients older that 56 years. This correlation was not observed in the study group. CONCLUSION: A great number of laryngectomees, mainly elderly persons, suffer from voice limiting pharyngoesophageal spasm which correlates to poor rehabilitation results in elderly. Pharyngoesophageal spasm preventing procedures are more beneficial in the elderly.
Asunto(s)
Espasmo Esofágico Difuso/epidemiología , Laringectomía/rehabilitación , Enfermedades Faríngeas/epidemiología , Músculos Faríngeos/fisiología , Espasmo/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Espasmo Esofágico Difuso/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Espasmo/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Voice-limiting pharyngoesophageal spasm presents a challenge to the surgeon who is trying to optimize functional voice outcomes in the laryngectomy patient. Modified closure techniques, adjunctive myotomy, and pharyngeal plexus neurectomy have the ability to improve or prevent pharyngoesophageal spasm. Attempts to maximize vocal outcome should be considered at the original time of laryngectomy and tracheoesophageal voice restoration because salvage treatment can be challenging.
Asunto(s)
Espasmo Esofágico Difuso/prevención & control , Laringectomía/rehabilitación , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Espasmo Esofágico Difuso/terapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirugía , Laringectomía/efectos adversos , Laringectomía/métodos , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Punciones/métodosRESUMEN
Because pharyngoesophageal spasm can limit successful voice restoration after total laryngectomy, 24 patients underwent a modified pharyngeal closure in an effort to avoid this problem. All patients underwent total laryngectomy with appropriate neck dissections and pharyngeal closure with a half-muscle closure technique in which only one side of the remnant constrictor muscles was used to reinforce the primary closure. Twenty-three patients underwent voice restoration. Twenty-two (96%) had a functional voice, and 1 patient (4%) had pharyngoesophageal spasm that required a secondary myotomy. One fistula (4%) occurred and resolved with conservative measures. Quantitative voice analysis demonstrated no significant differences between half-closure patients and control patients for fundamental frequency (96 Hz versus 101 Hz) or intensity (57 dB versus 64 dB). Extensive qualitative analysis by trained and naive listeners revealed no differences. This preliminary report indicates the half-muscle closure modification of the pharyngeal closure at primary laryngectomy may provide a simple and effective means of avoiding pharyngoesophageal spasm and maintaining an effective voice without increased complications.