RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Thyroid hormone autoantibody (THAb) is a common antibody in autoimmune disease and can interfere with the detection of thyroid hormone (TH). There was no research reporting the prevalence of THAb in Chinese and the rate of THAb interfering with TH detection. METHODS: We collected 114 patients with autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) (Hashimoto's thyroiditis, 57 cases; Graves' disease, 57 cases), 106 patients with nonthyroid autoimmune diseases (NTAID), and 120 healthy subjects. According to the presence or absence of thyroid antibodies, patients with NTAID were divided into two groups: NTAID-AITD and NTAID groups. Radioimmunoprecipitation technique was used to detect THAb in all subjects. TH was detected on Abbot and Roche platforms in patients with positive THAb. RESULTS: The prevalence of THAb was 22.8% in Hashimoto's thyroiditis and 45.6% in Graves' disease. The prevalence of THAb in AITD group was lower than that in NTAID or NTAID-AITD groups (34.2% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.014; 34.2% vs. 71.3%, p < 0.01). Among total 98 patients with positive THAb, TH levels of 9 patients were falsely elevated (9.18%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of THAb in AITD patients was lower than that in NTAID patients. Although THAb had a high frequency in various autoimmune diseases, the prevalence of THAb interfering with TH detection was only 9.18%.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

AIM: To evaluate four different commercially available assays for anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) detection and compare them with the in-house radioimmunoassay according to Farr (FARR-RIA) in order to select the optimal primary method for use in combination with FARR-RIA. METHODS: Sera from 583 consecutive patients sent to our laboratory for routine diagnosis, 156 selected patients with autoimmune diseases (76 systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE] patients and 80 patients with other autoimmune diseases), and 150 blood donors were tested for anti-dsDNA antibodies with two enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISA), two Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence tests (CLIFT), and FARR-RIA. The specificities and sensitivities of the tests were calculated and compared. RESULTS: FARR-RIA and CLIFT 2 showed the highest specificity for SLE (100%), with CLIFT 2 showing higher sensitivity (33% vs 47%). Both ELISAs showed higher sensitivities (>53%) than FARR-RIA but lower specificities (<93%), whereas CLIFT 1 showed the lowest overall agreement with FARR-RIA. CONCLUSION: CLIFT 2 was selected as the primary test for use in combination with FARR-RIA. The use of CLIFT 2 reduced the number of sera that needed to be tested by FARR-RIA, the time needed to report the results, and environmental toxicity, cancerogenicity, and radioactivity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Autoimmune myasthenia gravis is usually characterized by the presence of autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (~80-90% of patients) or muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK) (~5% of patients). In the remaining patients, no such antibodies (Abs) are detectable, but this could be due either to the presence of auto-Abs to yet unidentified antigens or to concentrations of circulating Abs below the threshold of the available assays. The most popular and sensitive assay for anti-MuSK Abs is a radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA), which uses (125)I-labeled MuSK as test antigen. A serious limiting factor of the sensitivity of such RIPAs is that small volumes of test serum are required (maximum 5-20 µl) in order to avoid excessive background values. We have overcome this obstacle by the development of a two-step RIPA. This involves non-stringent affinity purification of anti-MuSK Abs from a large volume of patient's serum, followed by a regular RIPA step, with the isolated Abs, to determine the antibody titer. This two-step assay was shown to be 10-50 times more sensitive than the regular RIPA. All tested sera previously found to be positive in the regular RIPA and normal sera were also positive or negative in the two-step RIPA, respectively. Importantly, of seven tested sera previously characterized by regular RIPA as negative with titers that were above zero, but statistically not significantly higher from the background, two were found to be positive, while the others were clearly shown to be negative. We conclude that our diagnostic test can detect very low concentrations of circulating anti-MuSK Abs. The general principle of this two-step RIPA approach may also be applied to the detection of currently undetectable concentrations of circulating auto-Abs involved in other diseases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In this study we describe the false-positive frequency in radioimmunoprecipitation assays for muscle acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and neuronal voltage-gated potassium channel (VGKC) autoantibodies, attributable to 125I-ligand immunoprecipitation. Sera were evaluated for AChR autoantibody (n = 34,095) and VGKC autoantibody (n = 11,028). We retested sera that yielded apparently positive results with 125I-ligand with and without detergent-solubilized cation-channel protein, indentified clinically validated fals-positive rates of 0.05% and 1.7% for AchR and VGKC autoantibodies, respectively. Specificity assurance in radioimmunoprecipitation assays requires subtraction of values for 125I-ligand binding.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

ANA IIF is an effective screening assay in patients with clinical features of SLE and will detect most anti-ssDNA, anti-dsDNA, ENAs, and other autoantibodies. False positives are common. The clinical importance cannot be extrapolated from the ANA titre or pattern, although higher titres (> 1/160) are more likely to be important. HEp-2 cells are the most sensitive substrate for ANA detection, but this must be balanced against an increased incidence of insignificant positivity. ANA positive samples should be subjected to more specific assays for the diagnosis of SLE. A combination of ENA (Ro/La/Sm/RNP) and dsDNA assays will detect most patients with SLE as long as the characteristics of the assays used are well understood. ESR and CRP measurements provide useful additional information. Sjogren's syndrome and MCTD will produce overlapping serology with SLE, and anti-dsDNA titres are sometimes seen in autoimmune hepatitis and rheumatoid arthritis. All results should be reported in the light of the clinical details, by an experienced immunologist. A suggested diagnostic protocol is outlined in fig 1. The type of assay used crucially influences the predictive value of the tests. ELISA technology dominates routine laboratory practice, but tends to produce more false positive and true weak positive results, which may reduce the PPV of the test. This can be minimised by using IgG specific conjugates and careful assay validation. The NPV for SLE [figure: see text] is high for most assays but the PPV varies. Where necessary, laboratories should use crithidia or Farr dsDNA assays to confirm dubious ELISA dsDNA results, and ID/IB to confirm dubious ENA results. For monitoring, a precise, quantitative assay is required. It is unclear whether the detection of IgM or low affinity antibodies has a role here. A combination of anti-dsDNA, C3, C4, CRP, and ESR assays provides the most useful clinical information. Anti-ssDNA assays are likely to be useful, and are potentially more robust than anti-dsDNA assays, but require more validation. Local validation of individual assays and EQA participation is essential. Not all assays that apparently measure the same antibody specificities have equal clinical relevance, even within a single technology. Insufficient international or national reference preparations are currently available for many antibody specificities to enable effective standardisation. Quality assurance schemes reveal large differences in units reported by different assays for some analytes, even when calibrated against an IRP or equivalent reference preparation. Serial results can therefore only be compared from the same laboratory at present. Most autoantibodies increase during active disease, but few prospective data are currently available to justify treatment on the basis of rising titres. Further randomised prospective studies are required to examine the importance of antibody isotype and affinity in the monitoring of SLE by individual assay methods. The most important aspect of the appropriate use of laboratory assays is to become familiar with the limitations of the technology currently in use in your local laboratory, and to consult with your clinical immunologist in cases of doubt, preferably before commencing serological screening.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The significance of different serological methods and assay systems for the verification of false positive cases of HIV infection has been analyzed on the basis of materials obtained in arbitration studies. As demonstrated by this analysis, the use of such highly specific and sensitive systems as Huma-Lab, Enzygnost, Serodia and Erythrorecombinant has made it possible to obtain a reliable result as early as at the first stage of expert diagnosis in the enzyme immunoassay and the agglutination test. The methods of radioimmunoprecipitation and indirect immunofluorescence have permitted a more precise differentiation of doubtful results than that achieved by immune blotting.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A serological investigation for human T cell leukemia virus I (HTLV-I) infection was carried out at the University Hospital, Kuala Lumpur. A total of 626 sera from a non-patient population and 1,038 sera from unselected in-patients were screened for HTLV-I antibodies using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 27/1664 (1.6%) were found to be reactive. However, on Western blotting, only 2 sera were confirmed positive, both showing reactions for the major core (p19 and p24) and the envelope (gp46) proteins. Both of the serum samples were from unselected hospital patients. Most of the remaining sera which were reactive on screening showed indeterminate results on Western blotting. These were further tested by radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) and none of these sera gave a positive reaction. Therefore, only 2/1038 (0.19%) unselected patients could be confirmed to have antibodies to HTLV-I. None of the normal individuals screened showed a positive Western blot result. Our data indicate that HTLV-I infection is present in our population, but at a low prevalence rate.

Asunto(s)