RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence and clinical features of leflunomide-associated peripheral neuropathy in patients with rheumatic disease over a 42-month observational period between January 1, 2016 and June 30, 2019. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted using regional prescription data identifying all patients treated with leflunomide for rheumatic diseases in the Southern District Health Board of New Zealand. Medical records were used to identify patients who developed peripheral neuropathy while receiving treatment with leflunomide. Demographic characteristics, co-therapies, and additional risk factors for peripheral neuropathy were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 482 patients were identified as receiving leflunomide for the treatment of rheumatic during the study period. In total, 23 patients developed leflunomide-induced peripheral neuropathy within the cohort giving a prevalence of 4.7%. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) performed in 18 (78.2%) of these patients confirmed a distal axonal, sensory, or sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy. The majority of patients (n = 22; 95.6%) either improved, stabilized, or resolved on cessation of the drug, with or without medication washout. Adverse symptoms were reported in association with peripheral neuropathy in 15 of the 23 patients (65.2%): these included pain, poor sleep, compromised skin integrity, poor balance, and a Charcot-like arthropathy. Additional treatment was required to manage symptoms of peripheral neuropathy including nine patients (39%) who received pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the previously reported association between leflunomide treatment and the development of a peripheral neuropathy. However, our findings suggest that this is more common than the previous estimates. In patients with psoriatic arthritis and previous tarsitis, there appeared to be an association with a Charcot's-like arthropathy, a complication not previously noted in the literature.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyse clinical outcomes of a non-medical switch from originator adalimumab (ADA) to its ABP501 biosimilar (ABP) over 6 months in patients with inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) in relation to comorbidity as a risk factor for therapy discontinuation. METHODS: RMD patients switching from originator ADA to ABP were identified from a large routine database from October 2018 onwards. Documented clinical data at the time of non-medical switching (baseline), and at 3 and 6 months were collected. Comorbidities were represented by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) at baseline and patients were categorized based on CCI > 0. Differences in the ABP retention rate over 6 months between patients with CCI = 0 and patients with CCI > 0 were analysed using Bayesian exponential regression. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients with axial spondyloarthritis (n = 68), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 23) and psoriatic arthritis (n = 15), were identified, 74.8% of whom had continued treatment with ABP after 6 months, while a smaller proportion had either switched to another ADA biosimilar (10.8%), switched back to originator ADA (7.2%), switched to a different biologic (3.6%), or dropped out (3.6%). At baseline, a CCI > 0 was found in 38% of patients. Cardiovascular comorbidities (40%) were most prevalent followed by diseases of the skin (33%), the gastrointestinal tract (20%) and the eye (20%). ABP treatment was continued after 6 months in 74% of patients with CCI = 0 and in 76% with CCI > 0. Bayesian analysis showed only a small difference (months) in the APB continuation rate between groups (estimate 0.0012, 95% credible interval (CrI) -0.0337 to 0.0361). Adjusting for age, sex, and disease subtype revealed somewhat shorter retention rates for patients with CCI > 0, but the distribution of the difference included 0 (estimate -0.0689, 95% CrI -0.2246 to 0.0234). CONCLUSION: In a non-medical switch scenario of RMD patients, there was no evidence for a considerable difference in ABP retention rates over 6 months between comorbidity groups.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The management of rheumatic diseases has noticeably changed in recent years with the development of targeted therapeutic agents, namely, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Identifying essential signaling pathways and factors crucial for the development and progression of these diseases remains a significant challenge. Therapy could be used to delay the onset or reduce harm. The endocannabinoid system's presence within the synovium can be identified as a suggested target for therapeutic interventions due to its role in modulating pain, inflammation, and joint metabolism. This review brings together the most pertinent information concerning the actions of the endocannabinoid system present in inflamed synovial tissue and its interaction with phytocannabinoids and synthetic cannabinoids, which can be used from a therapeutic perspective to minimize the inflammatory and pain processes typical of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) typically affect women of childbearing age. One of the challenges in treating these women during pregnancy is to manage the disease while minimizing or avoiding the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) that may increase the risk to the mother or fetus. Biologic therapy has transformed the management of these patients. This study aimed to evaluate the maternal-fetal safety and perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with IMID exposed to biologic DMARDs either preconceptionally or during pregnancy and compare them with women using conventional DMARDs and a group of healthy pregnant women. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study with prospective follow-up of pregnant women with IMID at a single center. We analyzed baseline maternal demographic characteristics, diseases, DMARDs, and maternal-fetal outcomes. RESULTS: A cohort of 244 pregnancies was studied. One hundred twenty-eight patients met classificatory criteria for rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and 116 pregnancies of healthy women were evaluated from the same study period. One hundred and one pregnancies in IMID patients (89.84 %) occurred under immunosuppressive treatment, 78.91 % of IMID pregnancies were under cDMARD (33.59 % exclusive cDMARD), 56.25 % under bDMARD, and 27.34 % under oral glucocorticoids. Anti-TNF was the most frequent (88.88 %) bDMARD and was used in 50.78 % of the IMIDs. There was at least one flare in 37.10 % of the IMID pregnancies, and 9.38 % experienced more than one. Among flares, 43.48 % happened in the first trimester, 34.78 % in the second trimester, and 19.57 % in the third. Flares were more frequent in the RMD patients compared with IBD (p = 0.041; OR 2.15, 95%CI: 1.03-4.52). Flare was associated with discontinuation of bDMARD before the eighth week of gestation (p = 0.016), but especially in the second (p = 0.042) and third trimester (p = 0.012). Maternal infections were an infrequent complication overall (7.66 %), although more frequent in patients with IMIDs (p = 0.004) but were not associated with cDMARD or bDMARD. IMID patients needed assisted reproductive techniques (ART) more often (p = 0.001, OR 2.83, 95%CI: 1.02-7.90). More cesarean sections were performed in gestations under treatment with bDMARD (p = 0.020) and especially in those under treatment with anti-TNF. Aneuploidies calculation risk and fetal malformations were not correlated with DMARDs (cDMARDs, bDMARDs, or its combination) nor with any of the DMARDs individually preconcepcionally or during gestation. Small for gestational age (SGA) newborns were higher in patients with IMIDs however, it was not associated with DMARD use. DISCUSSION: In general, patients with IMIDs who require treatment with bDMARDs have a more severe or refractory disease prior to gestation. In our cohort, we found a higher risk of flare among patients with bDMARDs, especially when those were suspended early. Among maternal outcomes, we found that IMID patients needed ART more often. This is probably, first of all, because of maternal age. Among fetal outcomes, there are no differences in congenital malformations in the IMIDs and healthy patients and were not correlated with DMARDs. CONCLUSION: The use of bDMARDs was effective in disease control and safe from a maternal-fetal point of view, with no increase in prematurity, SGA, malformations, or infections.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BLyS and APRIL have the capability to bind to B cells within the body, allowing these cells to evade elimination when they should naturally be removed. While BLyS primarily plays a role in B cell development and maturation, APRIL is linked to B cell activation and the secretion of antibodies. Thus, in theory, inhibiting BLyS or APRIL could diminish the population of aberrant B cells that contribute to SLE and reduce disease activity in patients. Telitacicept functions by binding to and neutralizing the activities of both BLyS and APRIL, thus hindering the maturation and survival of plasma cells and fully developed B cells. The design of telitacicept is distinctive; it is not a monoclonal antibody but a TACI-Fc fusion protein generated through recombinant DNA technology. This fusion involves merging gene segments of the TACI protein, which can target BLyS/APRIL simultaneously, with the Fc gene segment of the human IgG protein. The TACI-Fc fusion protein exhibits the combined characteristics of both proteins. Currently utilized for autoimmune disease treatment, telitacicept is undergoing clinical investigations globally to assess its efficacy in managing various autoimmune conditions. This review consolidates information on the mechanistic actions, dosing regimens, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety profile of telitacicept-a dual-targeted biological agent. It integrates findings from prior experiments and pharmacokinetic analyses in the treatment of RA and SLE, striving to offer a comprehensive overview of telitacicept's research advancements.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the occurrence of breakthrough COVID-19 infections (BIs) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared with patients with other rheumatic autoimmune diseases (rAIDs), patients with non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs), and healthy controls (HCs). METHODS: The study was based on data from 7035 fully vaccinated respondents to the online COVAD questionnaire with SLE (N = 852), rAIDs (N = 3098), or nrAIDs (N = 414), and HCs (N = 2671). BI was defined as COVID-19 infection occurring in individuals vaccinated with ≥ 2 doses (or 1 dose of J&J) ≥ 14 days after vaccination and not after 6 months since the last vaccine dose. Data were analysed using linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 91/852 (10.7%) SLE patients reported at least one BI. The frequency of BIs in SLE patients was comparable to that among HCs (277/2671; p = 0.847) and patients with nrAID (39/414; p = 0.552) but higher than that among patients with other rAIDs (235/3098; p = 0.005). No demographic factors or treatments were associated with BIs in SLE patients (p ≥ 0.05 for all). Joint pain was more frequent in SLE patients than in HCs (odds ratio [OR]: 3.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.89-6.04; p < 0.001) or nrAID patients (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.04-5.75; p = 0.041). Patient with SLE did not report a higher frequency of hospitalisation or need for advanced treatment for COVID-19 infection compared with disease controls and HCs, respectively. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccination conferred similar protection against COVID-19 infection in terms of frequency and severity in patients with SLE to that reported by healthy individuals.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The past 25 years have seen major novel developments in the field of paediatric rheumatology. The concept of autoinflammation was introduced to this field, and medicine more broadly, with studies of familial Mediterranean fever, the most common autoinflammatory disease globally. New data on the positive evolutionary selection of familial Mediterranean fever-associated genetic variants might be pertinent to mild gain-of-function variants reported in other disease-associated genes. Genetic studies have unveiled the complexity of human heritability to inflammation and flourishing data from rare monogenic disorders have contributed to a better understanding of general disease mechanisms in paediatric rheumatic conditions. Beyond genomics, the application of other 'omics' technologies, including transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics, has generated an enormous dataset that can be applied to the development of new therapies and in the practice of precision medicine. Novel biomarkers for monitoring disease activity and progression have also emerged. A surge in the development of targeted biologic therapies has led to durable remission and improved prognosis for many diseases that in the past caused major complications. Last but not least, the COVID-19 pandemic has affected paediatric rheumatology practice and has sparked new investigations into the link between viral infections and unregulated inflammatory responses in children.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To present the main findings of a post-authorization safety study assessing pregnancy and infant outcomes after prenatal golimumab exposure in a real-world setting. METHODS: This observational population-based cohort study included data from pregnancies ending in 2006-2018 (Finland) or 2019 (Denmark, Sweden). Infants born to women with rheumatic diseases or ulcerative colitis diagnoses were identified. Based on prescription fills from 90 days prior to pregnancy until delivery, infants were assigned to one of the four drug-exposure cohorts: golimumab, other anti-TNF biologics, other biologics, and nonbiologic systemic therapy, and the general population. Prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, mortality, diagnoses of major congenital anomalies (MCA), and inpatient infections in the infants' first year of life were assessed. Odds ratios and 95% CIs were calculated for MCA and infection. RESULTS: Among 134 infants in the golimumab cohort, none were stillborn or died in the first year of life. MCA were diagnosed in 4.5% of the infants in the golimumab cohort, versus 6.8%, 10.9%, 5.5%, and 4.6% in the other anti-TNF biologics, other biologics, nonbiologic systemic therapy and general population cohorts, respectively. Inpatient infections were diagnosed in 11% of golimumab-exposed infants, compared with 9%-11% of infants in the other cohorts. Unadjusted and selected adjusted comparisons showed no association between prenatal golimumab exposure and MCA or infection compared with the other exposure cohorts or general population. CONCLUSIONS: The number of infants with prenatal golimumab exposure was low, but results are reassuringly consistent with the evidence available for other anti-TNF biologics. Continued monitoring is needed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In pharmacoepidemiology, robust data are needed to judge the impact of drug treatment on pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes and breast-fed infants. As pregnant and breastfeeding women are usually excluded from randomised clinical trials, observational studies are required. One of those data sources are pregnancy registers specifically developed to focus on certain diseases or disease groups. The German Rhekiss register investigates pregnancies in women with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD). Rhekiss is a nationwide, multicentre, longitudinal study, in which women aged 18 years or older with an underlying IRD can be enrolled by a rheumatologist either when planning a pregnancy or in the first half of pregnancy. Data are collected prospectively at regular follow-up visits. Rheumatologists and patients provide information in a web-based system before conception (if enrolment was at the time of pregnancy planning), during and after pregnancy. A smartphone app is available for patients. Maternal and clinical information, general laboratory markers, treatment with antirheumatic and other drugs, adverse events, items related to course and outcome of pregnancy and the health of the child are uniformly assessed for all diseases. Individual information on the IRD includes classification criteria, diagnosis-specific laboratory parameters, clinical parameters and validated instruments to measure disease activity or damage. Furthermore, patient-reported outcome measures are captured. A total of 2013 individual patients have been enrolled in the register, and data on 1801 completed pregnancies are available. In summary, Rhekiss is a comprehensive and complex register that can answer various research questions about pregnancy in women with chronic IRDs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Rheumatologists and orthopedic surgeons frequently collaborate on difficult decisions regarding perioperative management of immunosuppression in rheumatic disease patients, balancing risk of postoperative infection with risk of disease flares. Current evidence-based guidelines pertain specifically to arthroplasty, thus we sought to understand the trends and common practices regarding peri-arthroscopic use of immunosuppression. METHODS: Rheumatologists and sports medicine surgeons, from a variety of New York hospitals and serving a broad range of demographics, were surveyed on immunosuppressive medication management in rheumatic disease patients undergoing arthroscopic surgeries. Physicians' preferences were elicited regarding the use of common anti-rheumatic medications with the lower risk meniscectomies and the higher risk anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions and allografts. Physicians were asked specifically about peri-arthroscopic use of conventional synthetic diseasemodifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), biologics, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. RESULTS: During the survey period, 25 rheumatologists and 19 sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons completed the questionnaire. For lower-risk arthroscopies, rheumatologists favored continuing various csDMARDs (72% to 100%), biologics (50% to 64%) and JAK inhibitors (57%), while a majority of surgeons concurred for all three drug classes (csDMARDs 63%; biologics 53%; and JAK inhibitors 58%). For higher-risk arthroscopies, most rheumatologists preferred that patients continue csDMARDs (63% to 100%) but fewer supported the use of biologics (28% to 39%) or JAK inhibitors (22%). Surgeons were more hesitant to endorse any class of immunosuppressive antirheumatic medications (22% to 27%) around these higher risk surgeries. The rheumatologists were most concerned about surgeries taking place too soon after the last dose of rituximab, recommending these higher risk surgeries not take place for 7.7 ± 8.8 weeks following the last infusion. CONCLUSION: For lower-risk arthroscopies, most rheumatologists but only about half of orthopedic surgeons preferred patients continuing csDMARDs. Approximately half of both groups preferred patients hold biologics and JAK inhibitors. In more involved arthroscopies, most rheumatologists but few orthopedists supported the continued use of csDMARDs, and the consensus was to hold all other immunosuppression when possible. While the duration medications were held perioperatively were somewhat reflective of the current guidelines for arthroplasty, there is a need for evidencebased guidelines specifically regarding peri-arthroscopy immunosuppression in rheumatic disease patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Paediatric patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (pARD) have a dysregulated immune system, so infections present a major threat to them. To prevent severe COVID-19 infections we aimed to vaccinate them as soon as possible. Studies have shown that the BNT162b2 vaccine is safe, effective, and immunogenic, however, in a short observation period, only. METHODS: The main objective was to compare the serological response between three groups of pARD: after SARS-CoV-2 infection, after vaccination against COVID-19 with two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine, and after experiencing both events. Data on demographics, diagnosis, therapy, and serology (anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgA) were collected from March 2020 to April 2022. For statistical analysis ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were applied. To compare adverse events (AE) after vaccination we included a control group of healthy adolescents. RESULTS: We collected data from 115 pARD; from 92 after infection and 47 after vaccination. Twenty-four were included in both groups. Serological data were available for 47 pARD after infection, 25 after vaccination, and 21 after both events. Serological response was better after vaccination and after both events compared to after infection only. No effect of medication on the antibody levels was noted. The safety profile of the vaccine was good. Systemic AE after the first dose of the vaccine were more common in healthy adolescents compared to pARD. In the observation period of 41.3 weeks, 60% of vaccinated pARD did not experience a symptomatic COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSIONS: IgG and IgA anti-SARS-CoV-2 levels were higher after vaccination and after both events compared to after infection only. Six months after vaccination we observed an increase in antibody levels, suggesting that pARD had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 but remained asymptomatic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia (document number: 0120-485/2021/6).

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Inflammatory rheumatic diseases are different pathologic conditions associated with a deregulated immune response, codified along a spectrum of disorders, with autoinflammatory and autoimmune diseases as two-end phenotypes of this continuum. Despite pathogenic differences, inflammatory rheumatic diseases are commonly managed with a limited number of immunosuppressive drugs, sometimes with partial evidence or transferring physicians' knowledge in different patients. In addition, several randomized clinical trials, enrolling these patients, did not meet the primary pre-established outcomes and these findings could be linked to the underlying molecular diversities along the spectrum of inflammatory rheumatic disorders. In fact, the resulting patient heterogeneity may be driven by differences in underlying molecular pathology also resulting in variable responses to immunosuppressive drugs. Thus, the identification of different clinical subsets may possibly overcome the major obstacles that limit the development more effective therapeutic strategies for these patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. This clinical heterogeneity could require a diverse therapeutic management to improve patient outcomes and increase the frequency of clinical remission. Therefore, the importance of better patient stratification and characterization is increasingly pointed out according to the precision medicine principles, also suggesting a new approach for disease treatment. In fact, based on a better proposed patient profiling, clinicians could more appropriately balance the therapeutic management. On these bases, we synthetized and discussed the available literature about the patient profiling in regard to therapy in the context of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, mainly focusing on randomized clinical trials. We provided an overview of the importance of a better stratification and characterization of the clinical heterogeneity of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases identifying this point as crucial in improving the management of these patients.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Notwithstanding the wealth of literature on COVID-19, studies focusing on young adults with autoimmune diseases (AD) are lacking. To determine early (within 7 days) and late (after 7 days) anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-related adverse events (AEs), post-vaccine disease flares, COVID-19 severity and breakthrough infections (B-INFs) in young people with rheumatic diseases (RMDs) and non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nr-ADs) compared to healthy controls (HC). Data were captured through the international COVID-19 vaccination in autoimmune diseases (COVAD) 1 and 2 questionnaires. Of 20,685 complete responses, we identified 6010 from patients aged 18-35 years (1692 RMD, 400 nrADs, 3918 HC) who received up to 4 vaccine doses. BNT162b2 was the most frequently administered vaccine and prior to vaccination, 7% of people with nrAD were taking immunosuppressants (IS) versus 80% in RMDs. Early mild AEs were more frequent in RMDs (93%) and nr-ADs (92%) compared to HC (85%). The frequency of late mild AEs was < 20% in all groups. Severe AEs were rare. SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were similar across all groups, however, RMD patients reported a single episode of infection more frequently than nrADs and HC, while nrADs reported multiple infections more frequently than RMD. Self-reported disease flares were reported by 10% or RMD and 7% of nrAD patients. Our study reinforces the safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine also in young people with ADs, but it also highlights that among young individuals the number and clinical picture of SARS-CoV-2 infections is affected more by the type of AD rather than by coexisting IS therapy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: T follicular helper (Tfh) cells are a subdivision of T helper cells involved in antigen-specific B cell immunity. Tfh cells play an essential role in the interaction of T cells/B cells in the germinal centers (GC), and dysregulation of Tfh actions can offer pathogenic autoantibody formation and lead to the development of autoimmune diseases. This study seeks to evaluate changes in Tfh frequency and its related cytokines in autoimmune disease, its association with disease phase, severity, prognosis, and the effect of immunosuppressive treatment on the Tfh population. METHOD: The study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Statement. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, were systematically searched for potentially eligible studies up to January 1, 2024. RESULTS: We identified 4998 articles in the initial search, from which 1686 similar titles were removed. A total of 3312 articles were initially screened, and 3051 articles were excluded by title/abstract screening. A total of 261 studies were considered for full-text assessment, and 205 articles were excluded by reason. Finally, a total of 56 studies were included in our review. CONCLUSION: The population of Tfh cells is generally higher in autoimmune diseases versus Health control. Moreover, the number of Tfh cells is associated with the disease severity and can be considered for determining the prognosis of studies. Also, peripheral blood circulating Tfh (cTfh) cells are an available sample that can be used as an indicator for diagnosing diseases.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The interleukin-6 (IL-6) pathway plays a crucial role in various rheumatic diseases. Tocilizumab, a biologic targeting IL-6 receptor, has been widely used in clinical practice, though it's officially approved in China for only three indications. To address clinical challenges associated with the off-label use of tocilizumab in treating rheumatic diseases, the Committee of Chinese Primary Health Care Foundation for Rheumatologists and Immunologists engaged multidisciplinary experts and highlight 12 related clinical issues. We aggregated the drug specifications, the guidelines for clinical management of rheumatic diseases and the evidence from clinical research. Recommendations were formed through voting with the consensus conference method incorporating the Oxford evidence-based medicine criteria to evaluate the strength of evidence and recommendations. We have formulated 10 recommendations for off-label use of tocilizumab related to giant cell arteritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, Takayasu arteritis, systemic sclerosis, adult-onset Still's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. This consensus aims to provide references for the rational use of tocilizumab in clinical practice and enhance pharmacovigilance monitoring.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organisation Essential Medicines List (WHO EML) guides National Essential Medicines Lists and Standard Treatment Guidelines for clearly identified disease priorities especially in low- and middle-income countries. This study compares the degree to which the basket of medicines recommended for rheumatic diseases in children and young people in National Essential Medicines Lists of countries in the WHO Africa region, corresponds to the 2021 WHO EML and WHO EML for children, as a proxy of availability. METHODS: An online search of the WHO medicines and health technology portal, the Health Ministry websites of the 54 African countries, PUBMED and Google Scholar, with search terms for 'National Essential Medicines List', AND/OR 'standard treatment guidelines' AND/OR 'Lista Nacional de Medicamentos Essenciais' AND/ OR 'Liste Nationale de Medicaments Essentiels' AND Africa AND/OR < Name of African country > was conducted. The number of medicines on the national lists were compared according to a predefined template of medicines; and the percentage similarity calculated. Descriptive statistics were derived using STATA. RESULTS: Forty-seven countries in the WHO Africa region have developed a National Essential Medicines List. Eleven countries do not have any medicines listed for rheumatic diseases. The majority of countries had less than or equal to 50% similarity with the WHO EML for rheumatic disease in children and young people, median 3 medicines (IQR 1- 4). The most common medicines on the national lists from Africa were methotrexate, sulfasalazine and azathioprine, with etanercept available in 6 countries. Seven countries had only one medicine, acetylsalicylic acid listed in the section 'Juvenile Joint diseases'. A multiple linear regression model for the predictors of the number of medicines on the national lists established that 20% of the variability was predicted by health expenditure per capita, socio-demographic index and the availability of rheumatology services (adult and/or paediatric) p = 0.006, with socio-demographic index (p = 0.035, 95% CI 0.64-16.16) and the availability of rheumatology services (p = 0.033, 95% CI 0.13 - 2.90) significant. CONCLUSION: Four countries (8.5%) in Africa have updated their National Essential Medicines Lists to reflect adequate care for children and young people with rheumatic diseases. Moving forward, efforts should focus on aligning available medicines with the WHO EML, and strengthening healthcare policy for rheumatology and pharmaceutical services, for affordable access to care and medicines.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The impact of rheumatic diseases, long-term medication, and vaccination on COVID-19 severity remain insufficiently understood, hindering effective patient management. This study aims to investigate factors influencing COVID-19 severity in Chinese rheumatic patients and to provide real-world evidence for patient care. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study consisting of two cohorts, followed by a nested case-control analysis. The outpatient cohort included non-severe COVID-19 patients, while the inpatient cohort included consecutive severe COVID-19 inpatients. Additionally, rheumatic patients from both cohorts were included for the nested case-control study. Clinical information was obtained from electronic medical records and surveys. RESULTS: A total of 749 outpatients and 167 inpatients were enrolled. In the outpatient cohort, rheumatic diseases were identified as a risk factor for the severity of dyspnea (No rheumatic disease: OR = 0.577, 95% CI = 0.396-0.841, p = .004), but not for mortality, length of hospitalization, or hospitalization costs in the inpatient cohort. Long-term glucocorticoids use was identified as an independent risk factor for severity of dyspnea in rheumatic patients (OR = 1.814, 95% CI = 1.235-2.663, p = .002), while vaccination and immunosuppressant treatment showed no association. Vaccination was identified as a protective factor against hospitalization due to COVID-19 in patients with rheumatic diseases (OR = 0.031, 95% CI = 0.007-0.136, p < .001), whereas long-term glucocorticoids and immunosuppressant treatment showed no association. CONCLUSIONS: Rheumatic diseases and long-term glucocorticoids use are significant risk factors for COVID-19 severity in the Chinese population, whereas emphasizing the protective effects of vaccines against COVID-19 severity is crucial. Additionally, the investigation provides preliminary support for the concept that long-term immunosuppressant therapy does not necessarily require additional prescription adjustments.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often used by clinicians to evaluate patient response to specialty medications used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) and rheumatologic conditions. Identifying associations among PROs and patient characteristics could inform patient-centered treatment monitoring. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association among patient characteristics and PROs, including patient-reported adherence (defined as no missed doses), medication tolerance, patient perceived effectiveness, and health care resource utilization (HCRU; defined as emergency department visits or hospitalizations), for patients prescribed specialty medications in 2 health system specialty pharmacies. METHODS: A dual-center, retrospective review of monthly medication assessments completed by Vanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy and University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System specialty pharmacy was conducted. Patients were included if they received at least 3 fills of a specialty medication from rheumatology or MS clinics from October 2019 to March 2022, excluding patients with more than a 30-day supply. Primary outcomes were the PROs of patient-reported adherence, medication tolerability, perceived effectiveness, and HCRU. For each of the 2 primary outcomes (adherence and tolerability), a mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to test for associations with age, sex, race, clinic, site, and the other PROs. RESULTS: A total of 61,926 assessments were completed from 3,677 patients (Site 1 = 3,346; 91.0% and Site 2 = 331; 9.0%). Patients were predominantly White (75.6%) and female (71.7%) with a median age of 50 years (IQR = 37-61). Assessments most frequently originated from rheumatology (76.0%). Nonadherence was reported 4.0% of the time, with the most common explanations being forgetfulness (33.1%) and medication being held because of a procedure or illness (29.5%). Most responses indicated perceived effectiveness as good/excellent (93.9%), with 98.5% of responses indicating no issues with tolerability. Patients who reported tolerability issues were 2.5 times more likely to report a missed dose (95% CI = 1.87-3.23, P < 0.001). An effectiveness rating of fair was associated with a 61% increase in the odds of a missed dose compared with a rating of good/excellent (95% CI = 1.33-1.94). CONCLUSIONS: Patients filling rheumatology or MS specialty medications within health system specialty pharmacies reported high rates of medication effectiveness and adherence and low rates of issues with tolerability and HCRU. Patients who report tolerability issues or lower perceived effectiveness may benefit from additional monitoring to prevent nonadherence.

Asunto(s)