RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Currently, inguinal hernias are highly prevalent in the Brazilian population, accounting for 75% of all abdominal wall hernias. The recommended treatment to correct them is inguinal herniorrhaphy, which can be performed through open surgery, mainly using the Lichtenstein technique, or laparoscopically, primarily through Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair (TAPP) or Total Extraperitoneal Repair (TEP) approaches. Like any surgery, these procedures have post-operative complications, with pain being the most common and debilitating. Currently, in European and Brazilian guidelines, the open Lichtenstein and endoscopic inguinal hernia techniques are recommended as best evidence-based options for repair of a primary unilateral hernia providing the surgeon is sufficiently experienced in the specific procedure. In that matter, the surgeon should make a choice based on assessment of the benefits and risks of performing each of them, and practice shared making decision with it patient. Therefore, the objective of this review was to assess the incidence of chronic postoperative pain by comparing the aforementioned surgical approaches to evaluate which procedure causes less disability to the patient. METHODS: The search conducted until May 2024 was performed on Medline (PubMed), Cochrane (CENTRAL), and Lilacs databases. The selection was limited to randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing TAPP or TEP to LC, evaluating the incidence of chronic postoperative pain published between 2017 and 2023. Evidence certainty was assessed using the GRADE Pro tool, and bias risk was evaluated with the RoB 2.0 tool and ROBINS I tool. Thirteen studies were included.  RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the groups in both techniques, favoring the laparoscopic approach, which had a lower occurrence of postoperative inguinodynia with a relative risk of 0.49 (95% CI = 0.32, 0.75; I2 = 66% (P = 0.001); Z = 3.28 (P = 0.001) with low certainty of evidence. CONCLUSION: The presence of chronic postoperative pain was lower in laparoscopic TEP/TAPP techniques when compared to the open Lichtenstein technique, meaning that the former can bring more benefits to patients who requires inguinal herniorrhaphy. Nevertheless, further randomized clinical trials are needed to optimize the analysis, minimizing the bias.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To analyze the effects of pain-predicting factors on patients in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). DESIGN: This is an observational and prospective study. METHODS: This study was conducted at a University Hospital in the state of Minas Gerais (Brazil). To collect data on demographic, clinical, and surgical factors, a collection instrument was devised. The verbal numerical scale was employed to measure pain levels before and after surgery in the PACU. A path analysis was used to assess a predictive model. FINDINGS: A total of 226 patients were included in this study. The incidence of pain in the PACU was 31.9%. A model with demographic, clinical, and surgical variables was tested. The final model, after including modification indices, obtained results that indicated an acceptable data fit (comparative fit index = 0.996; root mean square error of approximation = 0.08). Age (being young), sex (being a woman), oncological diagnosis as an indication for the surgical procedure, type of surgery (surgery of the digestive system), duration of surgery (longer surgeries), and high intraoperative doses of opioids were predictive variables for pain in the PACU. CONCLUSIONS: This study's findings provide support for pain management in the PACU. Furthermore, the results of this research can be used to anticipate the occurrence of acute postoperative pain and personalized perioperative analgesia needs.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Estimado editor: El protocolo de recuperación optimizada Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)® se inició como un proyecto del autor y del profesor Kenneth Fearon de Edimburgo, en el Reino Unido en 2001.1,2 ERAS® es un conjunto de estrategias multimodales perioperatorias basadas en la evidencia, y cuya finalidad es reducir el estrés metabólico causado por el trauma quirúrgico y por apoyar la recuperación temprana del paciente. Actualmente abarca todas las cirugías abdominales mayores, las de cabeza y cuello, cardíacas y torácicas.3,4) Antes de la llegada de los protocolos ERAS, los grupos quirúrgicos tenían sus propios programas de fast track, consistían en el alivio del dolor, la alimentación y la movilización tempranas y la disminución del estrés con la anestesia regional.3 La Sociedad ERAS® estableció desde el principio que los protocolos por sí solos no eran suficientes para poder aplicarlos en lugar de los cuidados tradicionales, por lo cual se designaron centros de excelencias, encargados de implementar los programas y contribuir a su desarrollo y difusión en la región; ejemplo fiel de ello es el ERAS LatAm,3 capítulo latinoamericano de la Sociedad ERAS, que abarca...(AU)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment using low (LC) and high (HC) concentrations of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six databases and the grey literature were searched to identify randomized clinical trials that evaluated postoperative pain after endodontic treatment using NaOCl. NaOCl concentrations were dichotomized into 'LC' (0.5% to 3%) and 'HC' (≥ 5%) and a proportion meta-analysis was applied to determine the postoperative pain prevalence: overall and according to pain intensity and postoperative time. The prevalence of patients using pain control medication was also determined. A significance level of 5% and a random effect model were applied for data analysis. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed by I2 index. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2.0 tool. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the review and eight in the meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of postoperative pain was 45% in LC and 39% in HC. The prevalence of pain in LC and HC after 24 h was 25% and 40%, respectively. After 48 h, the prevalence decreased to 10% in LC and 25% in HC. 'Absent pain' was the most prevalent score. The prevalence of patients who used medication was 9% in LC and 15% in HC. Three studies were classified as 'high RoB', five as 'low RoB', and two as 'some concerns'. The certainty of evidence was very low. CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment using LC and HC of NaOCl was 45% and 39%, respectively. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Postoperative pain is common after endodontic treatment using NaOCl, but tends to decrease over time.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a valuable alternative for pain management after video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS). The incidence of postoperative chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) is high while the quality of life (QoL) after VATS remains unknown. We hypothesised that patients with ESPB would have a low incidence of acute and CNP and would report a good QoL up to three months after VATS. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre prospective pilot cohort study from January to April 2020. ESPB after VATS was the standard practice. The primary outcome was the incidence of CNP three months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included QoL assessed by the EuroQoL questionnaire three months after surgery and pain control at the Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU), 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: We conducted a single-centre prospective pilot cohort study from January to April 2020. ESPB after VATS was the standard practice. The primary outcome was the incidence of CNP three months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included QoL assessed by the EuroQoL questionnaire three months after surgery and pain control at the Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU), 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: We conducted a single-centre prospective pilot cohort study from January to April 2020. ESPB after VATS was the standard practice. The primary outcome was the incidence of CNP three months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included QoL assessed by the EuroQoL questionnaire three months after surgery and pain control at the Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU), 12 and 24 hours postoperatively.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in an elective spine surgery population. BACKGROUND: Surgical outcomes such as length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and opioid utilization greatly contribute to patient satisfaction and societal healthcare costs. ERAS protocols are multimodal, patient-centered care pathways shown to reduce postoperative opioid use, reduced LOS, and improved ambulation; however, prospective ERAS data are limited in spine surgery. METHODS: This single-center, institutional review board-approved, prospective RCT-enrolled adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery between March 2019 and October 2020. Primary outcomes were perioperative and 1-month postoperative opioid use. Patients were randomized to ERAS (n=142) or standard-of-care (SOC; n=142) based on power analyses to detect a difference in postoperative opioid use. RESULTS: Opioid use during hospitalization and the first postoperative month was not significantly different between groups (ERAS 112.2 vs SOC 117.6 morphine milligram equivalent, P =0.76; ERAS 38.7% vs SOC 39.4%, P =1.00, respectively). However, patients randomized to ERAS were less likely to use opioids at 6 months postoperatively (ERAS 11.4% vs SOC 20.6%, P =0.046) and more likely to be discharged to home after surgery (ERAS 91.5% vs SOC 81.0%, P =0.015). CONCLUSION: Here, we present a novel ERAS prospective RCT in the elective spine surgery population. Although we do not detect a difference in the primary outcome of short-term opioid use, we observe significantly reduced opioid use at 6-month follow-up as well as an increased likelihood of home disposition after surgery in the ERAS group.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive techniques still continue to maintain their popularity in hemorrhoidal disease. In this study, we aimed to present the symptomatic recovery and recurrence rates, post-operative pain levels, and complication rates of patients treated with the laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) method in our clinic. METHODS: The data of patients who underwent LHP due to Grades 2, 3, and 4 internal hemorrhoidal disease in our clinic were reviewed retrospectively. The patients enrolled in the study were followed for at least 6 months (6 months, 1 year, and 2 years) and their results were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included in the study. Seventy-five (72.8%) of them were male and the mean age was 41.6 ± 13.6 years. The mean operation time was 17.9 ± 5.2 min and minor complications developed in 3 (2.9%) patients postoperatively. Mean time to return to normal daily life was 2.17 (1-11) days. Recurrence developed in 16 (17.6%) patients with Grades 2 and 3 disease and in 6 (50%) of 12 patients with Grade 4 disease (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: LHP is a popular procedure which is effective in selected patient groups with acceptable recurrence rates.

OBJETIVO: Presentar las tasas de recurrencia y recuperación sintomática, los niveles de dolor posoperatorio y las tasas de complicaciones de los pacientes tratados con hemorroidoplastia láser en nuestra clínica. MÉTODO: Los datos de los pacientes que se sometieron a hemorroidoplastia láser debido a enfermedad hemorroidal interna de grados 2, 3 y 4 en nuestra clínica se revisaron retrospectivamente. Los pacientes incluidos en el estudio fueron seguidos durante al menos 6 meses (6 meses, 1 año y 2 años) y se analizaron sus desenlaces. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron en el estudio 103 pacientes, de los cuales 75 (72.8%) eran de sexo masculino. La edad media fue de 41.6 ± 13.6 años. El tiempo operatorio medio fue de 17.9 ± 5.2 minutos. Se desarrollaron complicaciones menores en 3 (2.9%) pacientes en el posoperatorio. El tiempo medio de reincorporación a la vida diaria normal fue de 2.17 (1-11) días. La recurrencia se observó en 16 (17.6 %) pacientes con enfermedad de grados 2 y 3, y en 6 (50%) de 12 pacientes con enfermedad de grado 4 (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONES: La hemorroidoplastia láser es un procedimiento popular que es efectivo en grupos de pacientes seleccionados, con tasas de recurrencia aceptables.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract Background The effect of regional analgesia on perioperative infectious complications remains unknown. We therefore tested the hypothesis that a composite of serious infections after colorectal surgery is less common in patients with regional analgesia than in those given Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV-PCA) with opiates. Methods Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery lasting one hour or more under general anesthesia at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus between 2009 and 2015 were included in this retrospective analysis. Exposures were defined as regional postoperative analgesia with epidurals or Transversus Abdominis Plane blocks (TAP); or IV-PCA with opiates only. The outcome was defined as a composite of in-hospital serious infections, including intraabdominal abscess, pelvic abscess, deep or organ-space Surgical Site Infection (SSI), clostridium difficile, pneumonia, or sepsis. Logistic regression model adjusted for the imbalanced potential confounding factors among the subset of matched surgeries was used to report the odds ratios along with 95% confidence limits. The significance criterion was p < 0.05. Results A total of 7811 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria of which we successfully matched 681 regional anesthesia patients to 2862 IV-PCA only patients based on propensity scores derived from potential confounding factors. There were 82 (12%) in-hospital postoperative serious infections in the regional analgesia group vs. 285 (10%) in IV-PCA patients. Regional analgesia was not significantly associated with serious infection (odds ratio: 1.14; 95% Confidence Interval 0.87‒1.49; p-value = 0.339) after adjusting for surgical duration and volume of intraoperative crystalloids. Conclusion Regional analgesia should not be selected as postoperative analgesic technique to reduce infections.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effect of regional analgesia on perioperative infectious complications remains unknown. We therefore tested the hypothesis that a composite of serious infections after colorectal surgery is less common in patients with regional analgesia than in those given Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV-PCA) with opiates. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery lasting one hour or more under general anesthesia at the Cleveland Clinic Main Campus between 2009 and 2015 were included in this retrospective analysis. Exposures were defined as regional postoperative analgesia with epidurals or Transversus Abdominis Plane blocks (TAP); or IV-PCA with opiates only. The outcome was defined as a composite of in-hospital serious infections, including intraabdominal abscess, pelvic abscess, deep or organ-space Surgical Site Infection (SSI), clostridium difficile, pneumonia, or sepsis. Logistic regression model adjusted for the imbalanced potential confounding factors among the subset of matched surgeries was used to report the odds ratios along with 95% confidence limits. The significance criterion was p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 7811 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria of which we successfully matched 681 regional anesthesia patients to 2862 IV-PCA only patients based on propensity scores derived from potential confounding factors. There were 82 (12%) in-hospital postoperative serious infections in the regional analgesia group vs. 285 (10%) in IV-PCA patients. Regional analgesia was not significantly associated with serious infection (odds ratio: 1.14; 95% Confidence Interval 0.87‒1.49; p-value = 0.339) after adjusting for surgical duration and volume of intraoperative crystalloids. CONCLUSION: Regional analgesia should not be selected as postoperative analgesic technique to reduce infections.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic approaches to inguinal hernia repair include transabdominal extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal, both of which are widely performed and employ mesh. Indicators of success for these surgical procedures include incidence of complications, time to return to daily activities, incidence of postoperative chronic pain, and the long-term postoperative patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate and compare long-term postoperative incidence of chronic pain and overall quality of life among patients undergoing transabdominal extraperitoneal or transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Medical records were analyzed, and the SF-36 questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale were applied to assess quality of life and chronic pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair between January 2017 and February 2021. RESULTS: A total of 167 patients status post laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, who were 3 months postoperatively or longer, were included in the study. Among the early complications seen, seroma was most common in the transabdominal preperitoneal group (p=0.04). Subsequently, 40 of the initial 167 patients answered to the survey instrument (SF-36 and Visual Analog Scale). Mean patient-reported pain (Visual Analog Scale score) was statistically similar between groups, with 1.29 for transabdominal preperitoneal and 1.68 for transabdominal extraperitoneal (p=0.92). In the domains evaluated by the SF-36, there was no significant difference between the samples. CONCLUSION: Both transabdominal extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal techniques for hernia repair have similar results in the late postoperative period regarding quality of life and prevalence of chronic pain. They are also comparable in terms of major early postoperative complications, except for seroma, with a higher incidence in patients undergoing transabdominal preperitoneal.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Regarding postoperative pain, it remains unclear whether non-fixation of the polypropylene prosthesis in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair produces the same outcomes as mesh fixation with glue or tackers. In addition, hernia recurrence is another aspect to be assessed in the comparison between non-fixation and mesh-fixation techniques (tackers and glue). AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, quality of pain, and recurrence in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty (transabdominal preperitoneal) technique, comparing the fixation of the mesh with tackers versus with glue versus without fixation. METHODS: This is a prospective, double-blind study in which 63 patients presenting with primary unilateral inguinal hernia underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and were randomized into three groups: no mesh fixation (n=21), mesh tacked (n=21), and mesh fixed with fibrin glue (n=21). Patients also responded to questionnaires in order to assess pain and pain quality and were followed up for 2 years. RESULTS: Neither mesh-fixation nor non-fixation techniques were found to affect postoperative chronic pain (p=0.535), but patients undergoing tacker fixation reported more pain descriptors (p=0.0021) and a higher pain index (p=0.002) on the McGill scale in the first 15 postoperative days (T0 and T1). No hernia recurrences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Both mesh-fixation techniques (tackers and glue) used with the transabdominal preperitoneal approach did not influence the onset of inguinodynia, but tacker fixation was more likely to increase patient sensitivity to pain. Mesh placement without fixation produced the same pain and recurrence outcomes as mesh-fixation techniques. Also, no recurrence was observed in patients without mesh fixation in this study. Consequently, it has become an alternative therapy deserving consideration for hernia repair.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Brief Measure of Emotional Preoperative Stress (B-MEPS) was developed to evaluate the preoperative individual vulnerability to emotional stress. To obtain a refined version of B-MEPS suitable for an app approach, this study aimed: (i) to identify items with more discriminant properties; (ii) to classify the level of preoperative emotional stress based on cut-off points; (iii) to assess concurrent validity through correlation with the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) score; (iv) to confirm whether the refined version of B-MEPS is an adequate predictive measure for identification of patients prone to intense postoperative pain. METHODS: We include 1016 patients who had undergone surgical procedures in a teaching hospital. The generalized partial credit model of item response theory and latent class model were employed, respectively, to reduce the number of items and to create cut-off points. We applied the CSI and assessed pain by Visual Analog Scale (0-10) and by the amount of postoperative morphine consumption. RESULTS: The refined B-MEPS shows satisfactory reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.79). Preoperative emotional stress, according to the cut-off points, is classified into categories: low, intermediate or high stress. The refined B-MEPS exhibited a linear association with the CSI scores (r2 = 0.53, p < 0.01). Patients with higher levels of emotional stress displayed a positive association with moderate to severe pain and greater morphine consumption. CONCLUSION: The refined version of B-MEPS, along with an interface of easy applicability, assess emotional vulnerability at the bedside before surgery. This app may support studies focused on intervening with perioperative stress levels.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While interest has focused on opioid use after total hip arthroplasty, little research has investigated opioid use in elderly patients after hip fracture. We hypothesize that a substantial number of opioid-naïve elderly patients go on to chronic opioid use after hip fracture surgery. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of 219 patients 65 years and older who underwent surgical fixation between January 1, 2016 and February 28, 2019 for a native hip fracture. Patients were excluded for polytrauma, periprosthetic or pathologic fractures, recent major surgery, or death within 90 days of their hip surgery. The state prescription monitoring database was used to determine opioid use. RESULTS: Overall, 58 patients (26%) were postoperative chronic opioid users. Of the initial 188 opioid-naïve patients, 43 (23%) became chronic users. Of the 31 preoperative opioid users, 15 (48%) continued as chronic users. Chronic postoperative users were more likely to be White (76% vs 91%, P = .04), younger (78 vs 82 years, P = .003), and preoperative opioid users (odds ratio 3.3, P = .007). Arthroplasty vs fixation did not affect the rate of chronic opioid use (P = .22). CONCLUSION: Chronic opioid use is surprisingly common after hip fracture repair in the elderly. Twenty-three percent of opioid-naïve hip fracture patients became chronic users after surgery. Continued vigilance is needed by orthopedic surgeons to limit the amount and duration of postoperative narcotic prescriptions and to monitor for continued use.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative symptoms and pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) are common in women. However, there is no evidence of differences in incidence and severity among different age groups. We evaluated whether adverse postoperative symptoms were more common in younger than in older women after LC. METHODS: One hundred and fifty premenopausal (mean age 37.6 ± 3.6 y) and 145 postmenopausal women (59 ± 5.2 y) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Clinical and anthropometric parameters were analyzed. Study endpoints were the incidences of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and pain, and the additional analgesics and antiemetics needed after surgery. RESULTS: Body mass index was normal in 42.7% of patients in the younger group and 64.8% in the older group (P < 0.001). Reported pain was more frequent and intense in the younger group throughout the study period (P < 0.01). Additional narcotics were required in 18% of premenopausal versus 7.6% of postmenopausal women (P = 0.001), and the doses used to reduce pain were higher for premenopausal women (P = 0.02). PONV was more frequent in the younger group at 1 and 6 h after surgery (P < 0.005). Rescue antiemetics were required in 29 premenopausal and 13 postmenopausal women (P = 0.01). Hospital stay was shorter for the older patients (P = 0.01). Minor morbidity was observed in both groups (0.7% and 2.1%). There was no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Early PONV and pain after LC were more frequent in premenopausal women, who also required more rescue analgesic and antiemetic medication.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Prior studies have suggested that infiltration of local anesthetics reduce the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs). Opioid usage has become an epidemic. Some analgesic modalities, such as epidural analgesia and transversus abdominis plane block are associated with shorter length of stay and lower opioid use. The aim of our study was to assess the relationship between local infiltration of bupivacaine with rates of SSI and pain control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial in patients who underwent open major gastrointestinal procedures from July 2016 to June 2017. Patients were divided into two groups based on administration of 0.5% bupivacaine (n = 30) (group 1) or placebo (n = 30) (control group). Outcomes evaluated were SSI, postoperative opioid requirements and pain scores. RESULTS: Patients in the bupivacaine group required a lower dose of epidural analgesia during the first 24 h (5.3 mcg/kg/h vs. 6.4 mcg/kg/h; p = 0.05). Opioid requirement was shorter in the bupivacaine group (3.5 ± 2.3 days vs. 5.7 ± 2.9 days; p = 0.01). No difference was found between groups in terms of SSI rates (0% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear association between bupivacaine infiltration and reduction of SSI rate according to our study. Wound bupivacaine infiltration is associated with a lower dose of epidural infusion and opioid requirements.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing breast reconstructive surgery with Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Artery (DIEP) flap technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out in patients undergoing DIEP-flap breast reconstruction between January 2014 and December 2019. The main goal was the evaluation of acute postoperative pain through visual analogic pain scale (VAS) at rest (VASr) and movement (VASm) in the immediate postoperative period in post-anesthesia care unit (0h), at 24 h and at 48 h post-intervention and intravenous (IV) morphine con- sumption, depending on whether General Anesthesia (GA group) or Combined Anesthesia (CA group) was performed. Secon- dary outcomes were chronic pain incidence, perioperative complications, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), reinterven- tion and readmission rate and lenght of hospital saty. RESULTS: Sixty seven patients were included, 24 in GA group and 43 in CA group. CA group showed better VASm values at 24 h postintervention (p = 0.01). Postoperative IV morphine continuous infusion was required for acute pain management in 10.4% of patients (25% in GA vs 2.3% in the CA group; p = 0.004). Chronic pain rate was 13.4% (25% in GA vs 7% in the CA group; p = 0.038). Patients with worse initial pain control (VASr > 3 at 0 h) showed a higher incidence of chronic pain (66.6% vs 9.6%; p = 0.008). GA group presented higher rate of postoperative complications (66.6% vs 34.9%; p = 0,012), as well reintervention rate (58.3% vs 30.2%; p = 0.025). A sub-analysis showed that of the 10 patients (5 in the AC and 5 in the AG group) who reported poor initial pain control (VASr > 3 at 0 h), those belonging to the AC group, the IV morphine requirements were lower at post-anesthesia care unit (2 (0-5) mg vs 16 (9.5-23) mg; p = 0.016) and throughout the hospitalization period (4 (0-6) vs 24 (17.5-49, 2); p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Locorregional techniques could offer a better control of postoperative acute pain and a lower incidence of chronic pain, without assuming implying a higher risk of complications related to them in patients undergoing breast reconstructive surgery by DIEP flap technique.

OBJETIVO: El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar el dolor agudo posoperatorio en las pacientes sometidas a cirugía de reconstrucción mamaria mediante colgajo de la arteria perforante epigástrica inferior profunda (colgajo DIEP). MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se revisaron retrospectivamente las pacientes intervenidas de reconstrucción mamaria con colgajo DIEP entre enero de 2014 y diciembre de 2019. El objetivo principal fue la valoración del dolor agudo posoperatorio mediante la escala visual analógica (EVA) en reposo (EVAr) y movimiento (EVAm) en el posoperatorio inmediato en la unidad de Reanimación (0 h), a las 24 h y a las 48 h post-intervención y el consumo de morfina endovenosa (ev), según si se realizó una Anestesia General (AG) o una Anestesia Combinada (AC). Los objetivos secundarios fueron: incidencia de dolor crónico posoperatorio, complicaciones peroperatorias, náuseas y vómitos posoperatorios (NVPO), tasa de reintervención y reingreso y estancia hospitalaria. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 67 pacientes, 24 en el grupo AG y 43 en el grupo AC. El grupo AC mostró un mejor control del dolor en movimiento a las 24 h (p = 0,01). Un 10,4% de las pacientes precisaron infusión de morfina endovenosa (ev) para control del dolor agudo posoperatorio en reposo (25% en el grupo AG vs 2,3% en el grupo AC; p = 0,004). La incidencia de dolor crónico fue del 13,4% (25% en el grupo AG vs 7% en el grupo AC; p = 0,038). Las pacientes con mal control inicial del dolor (EVAr > 3 a las 0 h) presentaron mayor incidencia de dolor crónico (66,6% vs 9,6%; p = 0,008). El grupo AG presentó mayor tasa de complicaciones posoperatorias (66,6% vs 34,9%; p = 0,012), así como tasa de reintervención (58,3% vs 30,2%; p = 0,025). Un subanálisis mostró que de las 10 pacientes (5 en el grupo AC y 5 en el grupo AG) que refirieron un mal control inicial del dolor (EVAr > 3 a las 0 h), las pertenecientes al grupo AC requirieron menos morfina ev en unidad de reanimación postanestésica (2 (0-5) mg vs 16 (9,5-23) mg; p = 0,016) y durante toda su hospitalización (4 (0-6) vs 24 (17,5-49,2); p = 0,008). CONCLUSIONES: Las técnicas locorregionales podrían ofrecer un mejor control del manejo del dolor agudo y una menor incidencia de dolor crónico, sin suponer un mayor riesgo de complicaciones relacionadas con ellos en pacientes sometidas a cirugía reconstructiva mamaria mediante técnica de colgajo DIEP.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative chronic pain (PCP) is defined as a discomfort that lasts more than expected or beyond 3 months after surgery. The recognition and study of this clinical entity has been gaining interest in the past few years. One of the main reasons is the great impact it can have on the quality of life of patients who suffer from it. OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence, risk factor and impact of PCP on patients subjected to different surgical procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Search on MED- LINE/Pubmed, using the following terms: "chronic postsurgical pain", "chronic post operative pain", "chronic post operative pain", "chronic post surgical pain". Publications were then sieved using their title and abstract. RESULTS: Fifty-seven articles were analyzed. Ten to fifty percent of patients were reported as suffering PCP, with up to 10% incidence of severe pain. The main risk factors identified were the use of analgesics, pre-operative pain and type of surgery. Orthopedic surgery was highly associated with moderate to severe PCP within the first year. Twenty-one percent of patients referred PCP affected their quality of life and sleep; ability to carry out physical activity and return to work. CONCLUSION: The first approach to PCP is getting to know its impact and epidemiology. Surgical treatments can cause PCP, which will affect patient recovery and increase costs. Recognizing those patients at risk and establishing preventive management protocols could improve the quality of life of postsurgical patients.

INTRODUCCIÓN: El dolor crónico posoperatorio (DCPO) es aquel que aparece tras un procedimiento quirúrgico y se mantiene por más tiempo de lo esperado o más de tres meses luego de la cirugía. Es una entidad de reciente estudio y que tiene un gran impacto en la calidad de vida de los pacientes postoperados. OBJETIVO: Describir la prevalencia, factores de riesgo y el impacto del DCPO en pacientes sometidos a diferentes procedimientos quirúrgicos. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Se realizó una revisión de la literatura utilizando la base de datos MEDLINE/Pubmed. Los términos libres fueron "chronic postsurgical pain", "chronic postoperative pain", "chronic post operative pain", "chronic post surgical pain". Se realizó un cribado según título y resumen. RESULTADOS: Fueron analizados 57 artículos. De 10%-50% de los pacientes presentan DCPO y hasta 10% puede ser severo. El uso de analgésicos, presencia de dolor preoperatorio y especialidad quirúrgica han sido señalados como los principales factores de riesgo. La cirugía traumatológica aparece como la más asociada a DCPO moderado y severo a un año. Hasta 21% de los pacientes refieren que afecta su calidad de vida, el sueño, actividad física y reincorporación laboral. CONCLUSIÓN: El conocimiento de la epidemiología e impacto del DCPO es un primer acercamiento a este problema. Patologías de resolución quirúrgica pueden evolucionar con DCPO, afectando su recuperación y aumentando los costos que se desea contener. El reconocimiento de la población de riesgo y la instauración de protocolos preventivos pudiera mejorar la calidad de vida de los pacientes postoperados.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The International Association for the Study of Pain chose pain prevention as the theme for the 2020 Global Year. Chronic postoperative pain is one the many types of pain that can be potentially prevented. It develops or increases in severity after a surgery, persists for at least three months, even after ruling out all other possible causes of pain. To perform the present narrative review, the authors searched the PubMed database using the following keywords "postoperative pain" OR "postsurgical pain" AND "chronic" OR "persistent". The present review focused on the incidence, pain development and chronification, and predisposing factors. It also discusses prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic postoperative pain. Awareness of occurrence of chronic postoperative pain and recognizing risk factors is crucial for the day-to-day practice of the anesthesiologist. Hence, numerous surgical patients can have their outcome improved by preventing chronic postoperative pain, a condition scarcely identified and without a well-established treatment.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: to estimate the incidence and the risk factors for severe acute postoperative pain self-reported on the first day after hospital discharge. METHODS: cohort study with 279 children from both sexes (5-12 years old), indicated for ambulatory surgery in two Brazilian hospitals. Children were assessed at the pre-surgery, immediate postoperative and first postoperative day. Faces Pain Scale-Revised and Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale Modified were used. Severe postoperative pain was defined as score ≥6. Cox regression analyses were used. RESULTS: the incidence of severe postoperative pain was 15.8% (95%CI:10.7%-20.4%) on the first postoperative day. Preoperative anxiety (HR=2.23; p=0.049), severe preoperative pain (HR=2.78; p=0.031) and having undergone two surgical procedures (HR=2.91; p=0.002) were associated with severe postoperative pain. CONCLUSIONS: the incidence of severe postoperative pain self-reported after hospital discharge was high. Anxiety and severe preoperative pain, in addition to performing two surgical procedures at the same time were confirmed as risk factors.

Asunto(s)