Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Top Companion Anim Med ; 41: 100456, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32823155

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: There is little information about complications associated with peripheral catheter use in cats. The primary objective of this study was to determine the main reason for catheter removal in cats hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit at a university teaching hospital. The secondary objective was to describe catheter-associated complications in cats hospitalized. METHODS: All feline patients with peripheral intravenous catheters admitted to the Intensive Care Unit between June and August 2017 were prospectively enrolled in this study. All catheters were evaluated at least 3 times a day per institutional Intensive Care Unit protocol. The catheters were monitored throughout the cat's hospitalization period for development of complications, including occlusion, phlebitis and extravasation. Data collected included patient signalment, reason for hospitalization, catheter size and location, number of hours the catheter remained in place, reason for removal and if the catheter was replaced once removed. RESULTS: Thirty-four cats were enrolled in the study, and a total of 42 catheters were placed in those cats. Median peripheral IV catheter duration was 23.8 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 13.8-41.3 hours). The most frequent reason for catheter removal was patient discharge from the hospital (24/42, 57.1%). Overall catheter complication rate was 21.4% (9/42). Complications observed included phlebitis, extravasation, patient removal, occlusion, and edema formation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study conclude that the majority of peripheral IV catheters in cats are removed due to discharge from hospitalization. More studies with a larger population of cats are needed to see if there is a relationship between length of indwelling catheterization and risk of catheter-associated complications.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/veterinaria , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/veterinaria , Animales , Enfermedades de los Gatos/terapia , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Gatos , Infusiones Intravenosas/efectos adversos , Flebitis/etiología , Flebitis/veterinaria , Proyectos Piloto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/veterinaria , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos
2.
Can J Vet Res ; 84(1): 33-36, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31949327

RESUMEN

The study goals were to determine if intraosseous (IO) catheters can be placed with greater success into the humerus, femur, or tibia of cadaver rabbits, and to evaluate the accuracy of perceived success (PS) and objective clinical success (OCS) criteria against true intramedullary catheterization confirmed by fluoroscopy. This was a prospective study utilizing 12 rabbit cadavers. Twenty-two participants attempted IO catheter placement at 3 sites. Perceived success, OCS, and fluoroscopic true success (FTS) were recorded. A Fisher's exact test was used to compare PS, OCS, and FTS, and FTS rates between sites (P < 0.05). A Wilcoxon test was used to compare speed of placement (P < 0.05). Overall, of 66 attempts, PS was reported in 86.4%, OCS was documented in 62.1%, FTS was confirmed in 43.9%. Perceived success and OCS overestimated FTS (P ≤ 0.01 and P = 0.027, respectively). Confirmation of FTS occurred in 10/22 (45.5%) humeral, 5/22 (22.7%) femoral, and 14/22 (63.6%) tibial (P = 0.03) attempts. Median time until placement for the humerus was 37.5 seconds (range: 15 to 125 seconds); the femur 135 seconds (range: 91 to 148 seconds); the tibia 49 seconds (range: 19 to 150 seconds). The humerus and tibia were faster to catheterize than the femur (P = 0.01 and 0.03, respectively). Participant PS and OCS criteria overestimated FTS. The humerus or tibia may be more successful and are faster to catheterize.


Les objectifs de la présente étude étaient de déterminer si des cathéters intra-osseux (IO) peuvent être placés avec plus de succès dans l'humérus, le fémur ou le tibia de cadavres de lapins, et d'évaluer la précision des critères du succès perçu (PS) et du succès clinique objectif (OCS) versus le cathétérisme intramédullaire réel confirmé par fluoroscopie. Il s'agissait d'une étude prospective utilisant 12 cadavres de lapin. Vingt-deux participants ont tenté le placement des cathéters IO aux trois sites. Le PS, l'OCS et le succès réel par fluoroscopie (FTS) furent notés. Un test exact de Fisher fut utilisé pour comparer PS, OCS, et FTS, et les taux de FTS entre les sites (P < 0,05). Un test de Wilcoxon a été utilisé pour comparer la vitesse de placement (P < 0,05). Globalement, des 66 essais, PS a été rapporté dans 86,4 % des cas, OCS a été documenté dans 62,1 % des cas, et FTS a été confirmé dans 43,9 % des cas. Le PS et l'OCS surestimaient le FTS (P ≤ 0,01 et P = 0,027, respectivement). La confirmation de FTS s'est produite dans 10/22 (45,5 %) des essais sur l'humérus, 5/22 (22,7 %) des essais sur le fémur, et 14/22 (63,6 %) des essais sur le tibia (P = 0,03).Le temps médian du placement pour l'humérus était de 37,5 secondes (écart : 15 à 125 secondes); pour le fémur de 135 secondes (écart : 91 à 148 secondes); et pour le tibia de 49 secondes (écart : 19 à 150 secondes). Le cathétérisme de l'humérus et du tibia étaient plus rapides que celui du fémur (P = 0,01 et 0,03, respectivement). Les critères pour le PS et l'OCS des participants surestimaient le FTS. L'humérus et le tibia sont plus rapides à cathétériser et le taux de succès est meilleur.(Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier).


Asunto(s)
Catéteres/veterinaria , Fémur/cirugía , Húmero/cirugía , Conejos/cirugía , Tibia/cirugía , Animales , Cadáver , Catéteres/clasificación , Catéteres/normas , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Infusiones Intraóseas/veterinaria , Tibia/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Tiempo , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/veterinaria
3.
BMC Vet Res ; 15(1): 240, 2019 Jul 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31296216

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vascular access port (VAP) systems are widely used in human medicine to provide long-term venous access. However, in veterinary medicine the use of VAP systems is not common practice and publications on their potential applications have been limited. A VAP system was used as part of an experimental study on liver regeneration and implanted in the canine portal vein to create direct access to the portal venous circulation of the liver. The aim of the present study is to describe the surgical technique, its use, and the complications of a VAP system in three research dogs. RESULTS: The VAP system was successfully used for the intraoperative measurement of portal blood pressure, the administration of cell suspensions, and the collection of portal venous blood samples. Long-term complications consisted of dislocation of the VAP system in one dog (2 months after implantation) and thrombus formation at the catheter tip in two dogs (3 months after implantation). Both complications prevented further use of the VAP but had no adverse clinical implications. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that the VAP system is an effective and safe technique to obtain long term access to the portal venous system in dogs. However, complications with port detachment and thrombosis may limit long term use of VAPs in the portal system of dogs.


Asunto(s)
Vena Porta/cirugía , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/veterinaria , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/normas , Medicina Veterinaria/métodos , Animales , Perros , Investigación , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/normas
4.
Comp Med ; 68(1): 48-55, 2018 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29460721

RESUMEN

Currently available animal models for delivery of drug capsules and pharmacokinetic testing are limited by either intersubject variability in gastric emptying time or the need to sedate animals when using targeted delivery methods of drug capsules. With the increasing development of large-molecule biologics, better in vivo models for testing the pharmacokinetics of capsule-delivered drugs are urgently needed. To this end, we made engineering modifications to an existing bovine surgical cannula device, successfully implanted this modified cannula into pigs, and delivered drug capsules directly to the proximal duodenum. In our porcine model, capsule insertion and serial blood samples were all acquired without the use of sedatives. Furthermore, we were able to maintain cannulated pigs for weekly pharmacokinetic testing for more than 18 mo, with minimal postoperative complications. This study demonstrates a novel and effective porcine model of sedation-free drug delivery and blood collection that eliminates inconsistencies associated with models that require either gastric emptying or animal sedation.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/veterinaria , Duodeno/cirugía , Sus scrofa , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/veterinaria , Animales , Cateterismo/efectos adversos , Cateterismo/métodos , Vías de Administración de Medicamentos/veterinaria , Femenino , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos
5.
J Vet Intern Med ; 32(2): 805-814, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29460300

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Venous air embolism is a potentially life-threatening complication of IV catheter use in horses. Despite widespread anecdotal reports of their occurrence, few cases have been reported in the literature and the prognosis is currently unknown. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to describe the surrounding circumstances, clinical signs, treatment, progression, and outcome of venous air embolism in hospitalized horses. ANIMALS: Thirty-two horses with acute onset of compatible clinical signs associated with IV catheter disconnection or damage. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study. Data extracted from clinical records included signalment, presenting complaint, catheter details, clinical signs, treatments, and outcome. RESULTS: Most cases resulted from extension set disconnection occurring within approximately 24 hours after catheter placement. In fewer horses, extension set damage was cited as a cause. Common clinical signs included tachycardia, tachypnea, recumbency, muscle fasciculations and agitation, with abnormal behavior including kicking and flank biting. Less commonly, pathological arrhythmias or more severe neurologic signs, including blindness and seizures, were noted. Progression was unpredictable, with some affected horses developing delayed-onset neurologic signs. Mortality was 6/32 (19%), including 2 cases of sudden death and other horses euthanized because of persistent neurologic deficits. Negative outcomes were more common in horses with recorded blindness, sweating or recumbency, but blindness resolved in 5/8 affected horses. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The prognosis for resolution of clinical signs after air embolism is fair, but permanent neurologic deficits or pathologic cardiac arrhythmias can arise. Unpredictable progression warrants close monitoring. Systematic clinic-based surveillance could provide additional useful information to aid prevention.


Asunto(s)
Embolia Aérea/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/etiología , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/veterinaria , Animales , Arritmias Cardíacas/complicaciones , Arritmias Cardíacas/veterinaria , Ceguera/complicaciones , Ceguera/veterinaria , Embolia Aérea/complicaciones , Embolia Aérea/etiología , Embolia Aérea/mortalidad , Enfermedades de los Caballos/mortalidad , Caballos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/veterinaria , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/complicaciones , Convulsiones/veterinaria , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos
6.
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd ; 159(9): 477-485, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28952957

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous catheterization is a necessity for continuous administration of intravenous fluids and for intermittent intravenous access to avoid discomfort and potential complications of repeated needle insertions into the vein. Intravenous catheterization is commonly performed and well tolerated in horses, but catheter associated complications have been reported. The most commonly reported complication is thrombophlebitis, but others such as venous air embolism, exsanguination and catheter fragmentation may also occur. This article aims to review clinical signs, pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, risk factors and prevention of common catheter associated complications.


INTRODUCTION: Le cathétérisme veineux est une nécessité pour l'administration continue de fluides par voie intraveineuse et pour garantir un accès veineux intermittent afin d'éviter l'inconfort et les complications potentielles liées à la pénétration répétée d'une aiguille dans la veine. Le cathétérisme veineux est usuellement pratiqué chez le cheval et il est bien toléré mais des complications associées sont rapportées. La plus commune d'entre elle est la thrombophlébite mais d'autre, telles l'embolie gazeuse, l'exsanguination ou la fragmentation du cathéter peuvent aussi survenir. Cet article vise à résumer les signes cliniques, la pathogénèse, le diagnostic, le traitement les facteurs de risque et la prévention des complications communément associées avec le cathétérisme.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/veterinaria , Embolia Aérea/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/etiología , Tromboflebitis/veterinaria , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/veterinaria , Animales , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Embolia Aérea/diagnóstico , Embolia Aérea/etiología , Embolia Aérea/terapia , Exsanguinación/diagnóstico , Exsanguinación/etiología , Exsanguinación/terapia , Exsanguinación/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Caballos/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de los Caballos/terapia , Caballos , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboflebitis/diagnóstico , Tromboflebitis/etiología , Tromboflebitis/terapia , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/efectos adversos
7.
Arq. bras. med. vet. zootec ; 68(6): 1453-1457, nov.-dez. 2016. ilus
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS, VETINDEX | ID: biblio-827930

RESUMEN

O Port-o-Cath é um cateter venoso central totalmente implantável, o qual permite a infusão de quimioterápicos, hemoderivados, nutrição parenteral e coleta de sangue. Este trabalho relata o caso de um canino com um tumor no membro pélvico que foi tratado cirurgicamente e recebeu o cateter para a quimioterapia antineoplásica. A paciente possuía um sarcoma sinovial, tumor incomum em cães, que acomete normalmente as articulações e exige terapia multimodal. O tratamento foi feito em duas etapas; na primeira, o membro foi amputado e, na segunda, foi realizado o implante do Port-o-Cath e exérese de nódulo metastático. A cadela respondeu satisfatoriamente à cirurgia e realizou as sessões de quimioterapia com perfeito funcionamento do cateter, indo a óbito por outras causas 90 dias após o procedimento. O implante de Port-o-Cath para a quimioterapia é um grande aliado à terapia multimodal preconizada para o câncer, podendo o cateter ser considerado em pacientes que necessitem de medicação quimioterápica por longo período.(AU)


The Port-a-Cath is a totally implantable central venous catheter that allows the infusion of chemotherapeutic agents, blood products, parenteral nutrition, and blood sample collection. This work reports the case of a dog with a tumor in the pelvic limb that was treated surgically and received the catheter for cancer chemotherapy. The patient was diagnosed with synovial sarcoma, an uncommon tumor in dogs that usually affects the joints and requires multimodal therapy. The treatment was done in two steps, in the first the limb was amputated and in the second the Port-a-Cath implantation and the excision of the metastatic nodule were performed. The dog responded well to surgery and chemotherapy sessions held with proper functioning of the catheter, and died from other causes 90 days after the procedure. The implantation of Port-a-Cath for chemotherapy is a great ally of multimodal therapy recommended for cancer, so this catheter may be considered for patients requiring chemotherapy medication for a long period.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Animales , Perros , Vías de Administración de Medicamentos/veterinaria , Sarcoma/veterinaria , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/veterinaria , Terapia Combinada/veterinaria , Sarcoma/terapia
8.
J Avian Med Surg ; 29(2): 130-5, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26115213

RESUMEN

Bacterial culture and susceptibility testing results of a wound on the plantar aspect of the foot of a 4-year-old, male chicken with a class IV pododermatitis revealed a multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli bacterium, sensitive to only a few antibiotics including ceftazidime. Concerns over the volume and frequency of antibiotic injections, combined with the likely duration of treatment, led to the use of a vascular access port to facilitate intravenous antimicrobial therapy. The port was placed and maintained for 5 months without complication, and the infection was resolved. This case illustrates the feasibility and application of a vascular port in an avian patient requiring long-term intravenous therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Dermatitis/veterinaria , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/veterinaria , Enfermedades del Pie/veterinaria , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/veterinaria , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Animales , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Ceftazidima/administración & dosificación , Pollos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Pie/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino
9.
Res Vet Sci ; 95(2): 681-6, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23706903

RESUMEN

Long-term, frequent venous access for diagnostic, therapeutic, or research purposes in cats is problematic. Frequent blood sampling over extended periods is necessary for some therapeutic regimes and often required for clinical research in veterinary science. In this paper, we describe the implantation of vascular access ports (VAPs) and assess their use for repeated blood sampling over 16 weeks and 38 weeks, as well as the use of jugular catheters for one week. The VAP placement procedure was well-tolerated with few minor complications (minor swelling, contusion, or superficial dermatitis from self-trauma), which were not observed when neck bandages were applied immediately after surgery. Thromboembolism occurred in two cats, but did not occur after switching to a smaller catheter with a rounded tip and taurolidine-citrate locking solution. Although duration of access was much longer with VAPs compared to jugular catheters, patency rates were similar (89% (n=28) to 92% (n=12) after 16 weeks and 75% (n=12) after 38 weeks for VAPs; 88% (n=49) after one week for jugular catheters). Behavioural reactions to blood collection from 30 cats-assessed over 16 weeks and comprising 378 collections-were absent or minor in 99% of collections. These findings indicate that VAPs offer a viable alternative to jugular catheters for studies requiring frequent blood sampling and lasting more than 2 weeks.


Asunto(s)
Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/veterinaria , Gatos , Venas Yugulares , Flebotomía/veterinaria , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/veterinaria , Animales , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/veterinaria , Femenino , Masculino , Flebotomía/instrumentación , Flebotomía/métodos
10.
Res Vet Sci ; 94(1): 152-7, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22921371

RESUMEN

Vascular access ports (VPAs) are totally implantable devices designed to provide repeated access to the vascular system. Port access is performed by percutaneous needle insertion using a noncoring needle. VAPs have been placed in 12 dogs affected by different tumors and needing long lasting chemotherapy. Using the non-invasive Seldinger technique a silicone catheter was inserted from the jugular vein up to the junction of the cranial vena cava and the right atrium. The catheter then was connected to the port previously placed in a subcutaneous pocket over the scapula. 7/12 dogs showed no clinical complications. Port was removed in 4/12 dogs for post-operative complications as fistula formation (n.2) and infection/mal-position (n.2). One patient had mild complications shortly after implantation. VPAs were left in site until the death in the rest of patients. VAPs are useful for dogs undergoing long-lasting chemotherapy protocols as these devices allow peripheral veins to be spared and not seriously damaged for repeated infusion of vesicant drugs. In most cases VPAs are well tolerated and may be left in site for several months.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/veterinaria , Animales , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Perros , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/veterinaria
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA