Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.486
Filtrar
1.
Schizophr Res ; 271: 371-379, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39111258

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Many articles suggest that clozapine was strongly associated with a higher incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus, and the issue has remained unsettled. Many articles have compared clozapine with FGAs, but few have compared clozapine with SGAs. We aimed to compare the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus in adults with schizophrenia treated with clozapine and other SGAs. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of databases from their inception up until August 26, 2023. The specific databases include PubMed, Embase and others. We included non-randomized controlled trials involving the use of SGAs such as clozapine, olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, amisulpride, and zotepine, with a focus on new-onset diabetes mellitus as an outcome. We utilized odds ratio with 95 % credible intervals (95 % CI) as our effect size measures. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42024511280. RESULTS: We included 7 studies with sufficient data to include in the meta-analysis. A total of eight studies with 641,48 participants met the eligibility criteria. The OR of the incidence rates of new-onset diabetes between clozapine and olanzapine was 0.95 (95 % CI:[0.82-1.09]), between clozapine and risperidone was 1.25 (95 % CI: [1.09-1.44]), between clozapine and quetiapine was 1.44 (95 % CI: [0.92-2.25]). CONCLUSION: In patients with schizophrenia, clozapine has been found to have a higher rate of new-onset diabetes mellitus compared to risperidone. However, there was no significant difference in incidence rate between clozapine versus olanzapine and quetiapine. These findings can assist clinicians in balancing the risks and benefits of those drugs.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Clozapina , Diabetes Mellitus , Olanzapina , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Risperidona , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Fumarato de Quetiapina/efectos adversos , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéutico , Olanzapina/efectos adversos , Olanzapina/uso terapéutico , Clozapina/efectos adversos , Clozapina/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Risperidona/efectos adversos , Adulto
2.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1422752, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39211449

RESUMEN

Diabetes and its complications significantly affect individuals' quality of life. The etiology of diabetes mellitus and its associated complications is complex and not yet fully understood. There is an increasing emphasis on investigating the effects of endocrine disruptors on diabetes, as these substances can impact cellular processes, energy production, and utilization, ultimately leading to disturbances in energy homeostasis. Mitochondria play a crucial role in cellular energy generation, and any impairment in these organelles can increase susceptibility to diabetes. This review examines the most recent epidemiological and pathogenic evidence concerning the link between endocrine disruptors and diabetes, including its complications. The analysis suggests that endocrine disruptor-induced mitochondrial dysfunction-characterized by disruptions in the mitochondrial electron transport chain, dysregulation of calcium ions (Ca2+), overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and initiation of signaling pathways related to mitochondrial apoptosis-may be key mechanisms connecting endocrine disruptors to the development of diabetes and its complications.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Disruptores Endocrinos , Mitocondrias , Humanos , Disruptores Endocrinos/efectos adversos , Disruptores Endocrinos/toxicidad , Mitocondrias/efectos de los fármacos , Mitocondrias/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus/metabolismo , Animales , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/metabolismo , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/inducido químicamente , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39181309

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diabetic Mellitus (DM) has progressively emerged as a worldwide health problem, leading to the widespread deployment of antidiabetic drugs as the primary therapy in the global population. The incidence of diabetes medications-related movement disorders (drMD) is noteworthy but underestimated by clinical practitioners. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In order to address the incidence of drMD in DM patients and realize the serious outcomes associated with drMD, we conducted a real-world pharmacovigilance study of 612,043 DM patients using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from January 2004 to September 2023. Reporting Odd Ratio (ROR) was calculated to reflect the risk of drMD. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to adjust crude ROR with the mixed factors including age, sex and various antidiabetic treatments. Afterward, a Mendelian Randomization (MR) study was performed to elucidate the underlying genetic correlation between the genetically proxied targets of antidiabetic drugs and motor disorders. RESULTS: Among 11,729 cases of motor adverse events in DM patients, six categories of drMD were significantly associated with DM medications. Noticeably, metformin was revealed to drastically increase the incidence of parkinsonism (adjusted ROR:3.97; 95 %CI (3.03, 5.19), p = 5.68e-24), bradykinesia (adjusted ROR:1.69; 95 %CI (1.07,2.59), p = 0.02) and irregular hyperkinesia, including chorea, choreoathetosis and athetosis. Insulin/insulin analogues and GLP-1 analogues presented notably higher odds of tremor: the adjusted ROR (aROR) of insulin and GLP-1 analogue is respectively 1.24 (95 %CI (1.15,1.34), p = 2.51e-08) and 1.78 (95 %CI (1.65,1.91), p = 5.64e-54). The combined therapeutic effects of multiple genetic variants of metformin, especially AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) were markedly linked to a greater likelihood of developing secondary parkinsonism (OR:10.816, p = 0.049) according to MR analyses. CONCLUSION: The use of antidiabetic medications was significantly related to an increased incidence of movement disorders in DM patients. Moreover, MR analyses provided further genetic evidence for the pharmacovigilance study. This comprehensive investigation might help physicians recognize neurological adverse events associated with antidiabetic treatments and administer effective interventions.


Asunto(s)
Hipoglucemiantes , Trastornos del Movimiento , Farmacovigilancia , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos del Movimiento/epidemiología , Anciano , Adulto , Incidencia , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Metformina/efectos adversos , Metformina/uso terapéutico
4.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 5571, 2024 Jul 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956041

RESUMEN

Statin drugs lower blood cholesterol levels for cardiovascular disease prevention. Women are more likely than men to experience adverse statin effects, particularly new-onset diabetes (NOD) and muscle weakness. Here we find that impaired glucose homeostasis and muscle weakness in statin-treated female mice are associated with reduced levels of the omega-3 fatty acid, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), impaired redox tone, and reduced mitochondrial respiration. Statin adverse effects are prevented in females by administering fish oil as a source of DHA, by reducing dosage of the X chromosome or the Kdm5c gene, which escapes X chromosome inactivation and is normally expressed at higher levels in females than males. As seen in female mice, we find that women experience more severe reductions than men in DHA levels after statin administration, and that DHA levels are inversely correlated with glucose levels. Furthermore, induced pluripotent stem cells from women who developed NOD exhibit impaired mitochondrial function when treated with statin, whereas cells from men do not. These studies identify X chromosome dosage as a genetic risk factor for statin adverse effects and suggest DHA supplementation as a preventive co-therapy.


Asunto(s)
Ácidos Docosahexaenoicos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Mitocondrias , Cromosoma X , Animales , Femenino , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Ratones , Mitocondrias/efectos de los fármacos , Mitocondrias/metabolismo , Humanos , Cromosoma X/genética , Ácidos Docosahexaenoicos/farmacología , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas/metabolismo , Células Madre Pluripotentes Inducidas/efectos de los fármacos , Dosificación de Gen , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Glucemia/metabolismo , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Glucosa/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus/genética , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/metabolismo
5.
Environ Res ; 260: 119582, 2024 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38992756

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are persistent organic pollutants (POPs) that can negatively impact metabolic health through pathways including endocrine disruption. Few studies have evaluated diabetes risk associated with PBDEs. Little is known about the joint effect of exposure to POP mixtures on diabetes risk. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the relationship between POPs, individually and as mixtures, and diabetes development over 18 years (1999-2016) in midlife women. METHODS: We measured lipid-standardized serum concentrations of 34 PCBs, 19 OCPs, and 14 PBDEs in 1040 midlife women aged 45-56 years from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. We tested the association between POPs measured in 1999/2000 and incident diabetes using Cox proportional hazards models. We evaluated diabetes risk associated with the overall POP mixture using Quantile-Based G-Computation (QBGC). RESULTS: For most mixture components, single pollutant and mixtures analyses indicated null associations with diabetes risk, however results were inconsistent. After adjustment, hazard ratios (HRs) of developing diabetes (95% CI) associated with upper exposure tertiles (T2/T3) compared with the first tertile (T1), were 1.7 (1.0, 2.8) at T2 and 1.5 (0.84, 2.7) at T3 for hexachlorobenzene and 1.9 (1.1, 3.3) at T2 and 1.6 (0.88, 2.9) at T3 for PCB 123. A doubling of PBDE 47 was associated with 1.11 (1.00, 1.24) times the risk of T2D. QBGC identified no association for the overall joint effect of the POP mixture on diabetes (HR = 1.04 [0.53, 2.07]). CONCLUSION: Exposure to a mixture of PCBs, OCPs, and PBDEs was not associated with incident diabetes in midlife U.S. women, although some individual POPs demonstrated significant yet inconsistent associations with diabetes. Non-linear and non-monotonic dose-response dynamics deserve further exploration. More research is needed on the diabetogenic effects of PBDEs.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Éteres Difenilos Halogenados , Hidrocarburos Clorados , Contaminantes Orgánicos Persistentes , Bifenilos Policlorados , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Éteres Difenilos Halogenados/sangre , Contaminantes Orgánicos Persistentes/sangre , Hidrocarburos Clorados/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Bifenilos Policlorados/sangre , Exposición a Riesgos Ambientales/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Salud de la Mujer , Incidencia , Plaguicidas/sangre , Contaminantes Ambientales/sangre
6.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 3591, 2024 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678022

RESUMEN

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used for gastric acid-related disorders, but their safety profile and risk stratification for high-burden diseases need further investigation. Analyzing over 2 million participants from five prospective cohorts from the US, the UK, and China, we found that PPI use correlated with increased risk of 15 leading global diseases, such as ischemic heart disease, diabetes, respiratory infections, and chronic kidney disease. These associations showed dose-response relationships and consistency across different PPI types. PPI-related absolute risks increased with baseline risks, with approximately 82% of cases occurring in those at the upper 40% of the baseline predicted risk, and only 11.5% of cases occurring in individuals at the lower 50% of the baseline risk. While statistical association does not necessarily imply causation, its potential safety concerns suggest that personalized use of PPIs through risk stratification might guide appropriate decision-making for patients, clinicians, and the public.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , China/epidemiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto , Medicina de Precisión , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/inducido químicamente , Isquemia Miocárdica/inducido químicamente , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/prevención & control , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 90(6): 1463-1470, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38477540

RESUMEN

AIMS: Persons with diabetes may have an elevated risk of Parkinson's disease (PD). Statin use could also modify the progression of PD. The aim was to study whether there is an association between statin exposure and risk of PD in persons with diabetes. METHODS: A nationwide, nested case-control study restricted to people with diabetes was performed as part of nationwide register-based Finnish study on PD (FINPARK). Study included 2017 PD cases and their 7934 matched controls without PD. Persons with PD were diagnosed between 1999 and 2015, and statin use (1995-2015) was determined from Prescription Register. In the main analysis, exposure at least 3 years before outcome was considered. Cumulative exposure was categorized into tertiles, and associations were analysed with conditional logistic regression (adjusted with comorbidities and number of antidiabetic drugs). RESULTS: Prevalence of statin use was similar in PD cases and controls, with 54.2% of cases and 54.4% controls exposed before the lag time (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-1.15). Those in the highest cumulative statin exposure tertile had higher risk of PD than statin nonusers (aOR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.04-1.43), or those in the lowest cumulative statin exposure tertile (aOR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.07-1.57). CONCLUSION: Our nationwide study that controlled for diabetes duration and used 3-year lag between exposure and outcome to account for reverse causality does not provide support for the hypothesis that statin use decreases the risk of PD.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Finlandia/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prevalencia
9.
Ren Fail ; 46(1): 2313173, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522955

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the patient survival rates based on the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) in a large cohort of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD). METHODS: Data from a national HD quality assessment program were used in this retrospective study. The patients were classified into four groups based on the use of renin-angiotensin system blockers (RASBs) as follows: No group, patients without a prescription of any anti-hypertensive drugs including RASBs; Other group, patients with a prescription of anti-hypertensive drugs excluding RASBs; ACEI group, patients with a prescription of an ACEI; and ARB group, patients with a prescription of an ARB. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates in the no, other, ACEI, and ARB groups were 68.6%, 67.8%, 70.6%, and 69.2%, respectively. The ACEI group had the best patient survival trend among the four groups. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, no differences were observed between the ACEI and ARB groups. Among young patients and patients without diabetes or heart disease, the ACEI group had the best patient survival among the four groups. However, among patients with DM or heart disease, the ARB group had the best patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that patients receiving ACEI and ARB had comparable survival. However, patients receiving ARB had better survival in the subgroups of patients with DM or heart disease, and patients receiving ACEI had better survival in the subgroup of young patients or patients without diabetes or heart disease.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Cardiopatías , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antihipertensivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Diálisis Renal , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Cardiopatías/inducido químicamente
10.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 104: adv19676, 2024 Mar 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551376

RESUMEN

Allergic contact dermatitis is reported among individuals using continuous glucose monitoring systems and insulin pumps. The aim of this study was to describe contact allergy patterns for allergens in the Swedish baseline series and medical device-related allergens among users. Contact allergy to baseline series allergens and isobornyl acrylate was compared between diabetes patients and dermatitis patients patch-tested at the Department of Occupational and Environmental Dermatology during 2017 to 2020. Fifty- four diabetes patients and 2,567 dermatitis patients were included. The prevalence of contact allergy to fragrance mix II and sesquiterpene lactone mix was significantly higher in diabetes patients compared with dermatitis patients. Of the diabetes patients 13.0% and of the dermatitis patients 0.5% tested positive to sesquiterpene lactone mix (p < 0.001). Of the diabetes patients 7.4% and of the dermatitis patients 2.3% tested positive to fragrance mix II (p = 0.041). Of the diabetes patients 70.4% tested positive to medical device-related allergens. Of the diabetes patients 63.0% and of the dermatitis patients 0.2% were allergic to isobornyl acrylate (p < 0.001). In conclusion, not only medical device-related contact allergies, but also contact allergy to baseline series allergens (fragrance mix II and sesquiterpene lactone mix), is overrepresented in diabetes patients who use medical devices.


Asunto(s)
Acrilatos , Canfanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Diabetes Mellitus , Sesquiterpenos , Humanos , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Suecia/epidemiología , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Glucemia , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Pruebas del Parche , Lactonas
11.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 23(1): 52, 2024 02 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38310281

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients are still suboptimal, and it is unclear if diabetic patients might derive a benefit from the use of drug-coated balloons. AIMS: To evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus on the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI with sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) MagicTouch (Concept Medical, India). METHODS: We conducted a subgroup analysis of the prospective, multicenter, investigator-initiated EASTBOURNE registry, evaluating the performance of MagicTouch SCB in patients with and without diabetes. The study primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12-month follow-up. Secondary clinical endpoints were major adverse clinical events (MACE), death, myocardial infarction (MI), and BARC 2-5 bleedings. RESULTS: Among 2,083 enrolled patients, a total of 864 suffered from diabetes (41.5%). Patients with diabetes had a numerically higher occurrence of TLR (6.5% vs. 4.7% HR 1.38, 95%CI 0.91-2.08), all-cause death (3.8% vs. 2.6%, HR 1.81, 95%CI 0.95-3.46), and MACE (12.2% vs. 8.9%; HR 1.26 95%CI 0.92-1.74). The incidence of spontaneous MI was significantly higher among diabetic patients (3.4% vs. 1.5%, HR 2.15 95%CI 1.09-4.25); bleeding events did not significantly differ. The overall incidence of TLR was higher among in-stent restenosis (ISR) as compared to de-novo coronary lesions, irrespectively from diabetes status. CONCLUSIONS: In the EASTBOURNE DIABETES registry, diabetic patients treated with the MagicTouch SCB did not have a significant increase in TLR when compared to non-diabetic patients; moreover, diabetic status did not affect the study device performance in terms of TLR, in both de-novo lesions and ISR.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Reestenosis Coronaria , Diabetes Mellitus , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Sistema de Registros , Reestenosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología
12.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 4690, 2024 02 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38409191

RESUMEN

This study investigates the impact of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) on the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implants in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) over a 12-month period. We retrospectively reviewed 90 DME patients treated with DEX implants, categorizing them based on baseline HbA1c levels (≤ 7% and > 7%) and 12-month changes in HbA1c ("improved", "stable", "worsened"). At the 2-month mark, the mean central subfield thickness (CST) reduction in the HbA1c ≤ 7% group was - 147.22 ± 113.79 µm compared to -130.41 ± 124.50 µm in the > 7% group (p = 0.506). Notably, 12-month outcomes between these groups showed no significant difference. The "improved" HbA1c subgroup experienced a more pronounced CST reduction at 2 months (p = 0.042), with outcomes leveling off with other groups by 12 months. Conclusively, DEX implant outcomes in DME were not influenced by either baseline HbA1c levels or their changes over time. This suggests that local alterations in the inflammation milieu may have a potentially stronger impact on DME treatment outcomes, highlighting the importance of considering local factors in DME treatment.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Retinopatía Diabética , Edema Macular , Humanos , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Hemoglobina Glucada , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Implantes de Medicamentos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente
13.
PLoS One ; 19(1): e0284267, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38215162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hypozincemia is a prevalent adverse consequence in diabetes mellitus (DM) and ß-Thalassemia patients. We aimed to evaluate the level of serum zinc in ß-thalassemia patients with DM and a risk assessment for hypozincemia. METHODS: The study population included transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) and non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia (NTDT) with overt DM (fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥126 mg/dL, and/or 2-h plasma glucose≥200 mg/dL). Serum zinc concentration was measured by the colorimetric method, and the values below 70 µg/dL were defined as hypozincemia. Myocardial and liver T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI T2*, millisecond [ms]) were valued by a free contrast MRI. The demographic, clinical, paraclinical, and laboratory data were also recorded. The data belonged to the period from December 2018 until December 2020. RESULTS: Of 64 diabetic ß-thalassemia patients, 41 cases had zinc data in their medical files (aged 38 ± 9 years, 48.8% female). 78.05% of patients (n = 32) were TDT, and 21.95% were NTDT (n = 9). The mean ± standard deviation of zinc level was 110.2 ± 127.6 µg/dL. The prevalence of hypozincemia was 9.76%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27 to 19.24 (four cases). After controlling age, the odds of hypozincemia for using deferasirox (DFX) was 8.77, 95% CI 0.60 to 127.1. In ß-thalassemia patients, the age-adjusted risk of hypozincemia was calculated at 15.85, 95% CI 0.47 to 529.3 for hepatitis C. The adjusted risk of hypozincemia based on age for antacid use was 6.34, 95% CI 0.39 to 102.7. CONCLUSION: In light of this study, as well as hepatitis C, using DFX and antacids is associated with a high risk of hypozincemia amid diabetic ß-thalassemia cases. However, upward bias should be taken into consideration.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Hepatitis C , Sobrecarga de Hierro , Talasemia , Talasemia beta , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Talasemia beta/complicaciones , Talasemia beta/tratamiento farmacológico , Deferasirox/uso terapéutico , Sobrecarga de Hierro/complicaciones , Glucemia , Factores de Riesgo , Talasemia/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Zinc , Quelantes del Hierro/uso terapéutico
14.
Drug Metab Pharmacokinet ; 55: 100535, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38245949

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Esaxerenone is a novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker. Here, we assessed efficacy and safety exposure-response relationships of esaxerenone and its covariates and thereby justified the recommended dosage regimens, focusing on the safety benefits of up-titration regimen in patients at higher risk for increased serum potassium (sK+). METHODS: The relationships between model-derived individual esaxerenone exposure and efficacy (blood pressure [BP]) and safety (increased sK+) were evaluated using multivariate linear regression and Cox regression analyses, respectively, using data from 1453 hypertensive patients with or without diabetic kidney disease in five clinical studies. RESULTS: Exposure-efficacy analyses demonstrated that higher exposure was linearly associated with greater BP reduction over the investigated dose range. Exposure-safety analyses showed that higher exposure was associated with a higher risk of increased sK+ under a fixed-dosing regimen; higher baseline sK+ and lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were influential covariates. Model-based simulations suggested that fewer occurrences of increased sK+ are expected under the up-titration regimen (from 1.25 to 5 mg) relative to the fixed-dosing regimen (5 mg) in patients with different combinations of these covariates. CONCLUSIONS: The exposure-response analyses supported the esaxerenone recommended doses and the safety benefits of using the up-titration regimen.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Nefropatías Diabéticas , Hipertensión , Sulfonas , Humanos , Nefropatías Diabéticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Nefropatías Diabéticas/inducido químicamente , Receptores de Mineralocorticoides , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/efectos adversos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/inducido químicamente , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente
15.
Ophthalmologica ; 247(1): 19-29, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37579730

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The comparative safety and efficacy of different doses of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for diabetic macular edema (DME) and macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of different doses of IVTA in this setting. METHODS: A systematic literature search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was conducted on Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and EMBASE from January 2005 to May 2022. Studies that reported on patients with DME or ME secondary to RVO that received treatment with different doses of IVTA were included. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool 2 was used to assess the risk of bias, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines were used to assess certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Five RCTs reporting on 1,041 eyes at baseline were included in this meta-analysis. In eyes with ME secondary to RVO, high-dose (4 mg) IVTA achieved a significantly better change in best-corrected visual acuity (WMD = -4.75 ETDRS letters, 95% CI = [-7.73, -1.78], p = 0.002) and reduction in retinal thickness (WMD = -93.02 µm, 95% CI = [-153.23, -32.82], p = 0.002) at months 4-6 compared to low-dose (1-2 mg) IVTA. However, high-dose IVTA had a higher risk of intraocular pressure-related adverse events (RR = 2.99, 95% CI = [1.05, 8.50], p = 0.04) and cataract surgery (RR = 5.67, 95% CI = [3.09, 10.41], p < 0.00001) than low-dose IVTA in eyes with ME secondary to RVO. These efficacy and safety differences in high-dose and low-dose IVTA were not observed in DME eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The RCT evidence in this setting is limited. High-dose IVTA achieved greater improvements in visual acuity and reductions in retinal thickness than low-dose IVTA at months 4-6. However, high-dose IVTA had a less favorable safety profile than low-dose IVTA. The significance of these outcomes was based on patients with ME secondary to RVO, but not DME.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Retinopatía Diabética , Edema Macular , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana , Humanos , Triamcinolona Acetonida/efectos adversos , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Edema Macular/etiología , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/complicaciones , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/diagnóstico , Oclusión de la Vena Retiniana/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Intravítreas , Retinopatía Diabética/complicaciones , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico
16.
Oncologist ; 29(1): e81-e89, 2024 Jan 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37561957

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment has been identified to be a risk factor for metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in patients diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, the specific contribution of post-TKI metabolic syndrome and the individual TKIs, including imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib, contribute to the development of CVDs remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide database to investigate the incidence of post-TKI metabolic syndrome, including diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, as well as their association with CVDs. To compare the risk of post-TKI comorbidities and CVDs among TKIs, we utilized the incidence rate ratio (IRR), and subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) calculated from multiple Fine-Gray models. RESULTS: A total of 1211 patients without diabetes, 1235 patients without hyperlipidemia, and 1074 patients without hypertension were enrolled in the study. The incidence rate of post-TKI diabetes and hyperlipidemia was the highest in patients treated with nilotinib compared to imatinib and dasatinib (IRRs ≥ 3.15, Ps ≤ .047). After adjusting for confounders, nilotinib remained a significant risk factor for post-TKI diabetes and hyperlipidemia at an SHR of 3.83 (P < .001) and 5.15 (P < .001), respectively. Regarding the occurrence of CVDs, patients treated with nilotinib were more likely to develop CVDs than those treated with imatinib in non-hyperlipidemic group (IRR = 3.21, P = .020). Pre-existing and post-TKI hyperlipidemia were found to have a stronger association with CVDs, with SHR values of 5.81 (P = .034) and 13.21 (P = .001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that nilotinib treatment is associated with increased risks of diabetes and hyperlipidemia, with hyperlipidemia being the most significant risk for CVDs. Therefore, we recommend that CML patients receiving nilotinib should undergo screening for diabetes and hyperlipidemia prior to initiating TKI treatment. Additionally, regular monitoring of lipid profiles during TKI therapy and implementing effective management strategies to control hyperlipidemia are crucial.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus , Hiperlipidemias , Hipertensión , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva , Síndrome Metabólico , Humanos , Dasatinib , Mesilato de Imatinib , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Síndrome Metabólico/inducido químicamente , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/complicaciones , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Hipertensión/inducido químicamente , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperlipidemias/inducido químicamente , Hiperlipidemias/epidemiología
17.
Diabetes Care ; 47(1): 81-88, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37713477

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and concomitant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) must be on the most effective dose of aspirin to mitigate risk of future adverse cardiovascular events. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ADAPTABLE, an open-label, pragmatic study, randomized patients with stable, chronic ASCVD to 81 mg or 325 mg of daily aspirin. The effects of aspirin dosing was assessed on the primary effectiveness outcome, a composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for stroke, and the primary safety outcome of hospitalization for major bleeding. In this prespecified analysis, we used Cox proportional hazards models to compare aspirin dosing in patients with and without DM for the primary effectiveness and safety outcome. RESULTS: Of 15,076 patients, 5,676 (39%) had DM of whom 2,820 (49.7%) were assigned to 81 mg aspirin and 2,856 (50.3%) to 325 mg aspirin. Patients with versus without DM had higher rates of the composite cardiovascular outcome (9.6% vs. 5.9%; P < 0.001) and bleeding events (0.78% vs. 0.50%; P < 0.001). When comparing 81 mg vs. 325 mg of aspirin, patients with DM had no difference in the primary effectiveness outcome (9.3% vs. 10.0%; hazard ratio [HR] 0.98 [95% CI 0.83-1.16]; P = 0.265) or safety outcome (0.87% vs. 0.69%; subdistribution HR 1.25 [95% CI 0.72-2.16]; P = 0.772). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the inherently higher risk of patients with DM irrespective of aspirin dosing. Our findings suggest that a higher dose of aspirin yields no added clinical benefit, even in a more vulnerable population.


Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus , Infarto del Miocardio , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
18.
Schizophr Bull ; 50(2): 447-459, 2024 Mar 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37622178

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Antipsychotics are first-line drug treatments for schizophrenia. When antipsychotic monotherapy is ineffective, combining two antipsychotic drugs is common although treatment guidelines warn of possible increases in side effects. Risks of metabolic side effects with antipsychotic polypharmacy have not been fully investigated. This study examined associations between antipsychotic polypharmacy and risk of developing diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia in adults with schizophrenia, and impact of co-prescription of first- and second-generation antipsychotics. STUDY DESIGN: A population-based prospective cohort study was conducted in the United Kingdom using linked primary care, secondary care, mental health, and social deprivation datasets. Cox proportional hazards models with stabilizing weights were used to estimate risk of metabolic disorders among adults with schizophrenia, comparing patients on antipsychotic monotherapy vs polypharmacy, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, and antipsychotic dose. STUDY RESULTS: Median follow-up time across the three cohorts was approximately 14 months. 6.6% developed hypertension in the cohort assembled for this outcome, with polypharmacy conferring an increased risk compared to monotherapy, (adjusted Hazard Ratio = 3.16; P = .021). Patients exposed to exclusive first-generation antipsychotic polypharmacy had greater risk of hypertension compared to those exposed to combined first- and second-generation polypharmacy (adjusted HR 0.29, P = .039). No associations between polypharmacy and risk of diabetes or hyperlipidemia were found. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotic polypharmacy, particularly polypharmacy solely comprised of first-generation antipsychotics, increased the risk of hypertension. Future research employing larger samples, follow-up longer than the current median of 14 months, and more complex methodologies may further elucidate the association reported in this study.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Diabetes Mellitus , Hiperlipidemias , Hipertensión , Enfermedades Metabólicas , Esquizofrenia , Adulto , Humanos , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/inducido químicamente , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades Metabólicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Hiperlipidemias/inducido químicamente , Hiperlipidemias/epidemiología , Hiperlipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/inducido químicamente , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico
19.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 26(1): 31-38, 2024 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37474127

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study sought to compare medication efficacy in participants with medical comorbidities who smoke in the Evaluating Adverse Events in a Global Smoking Cessation Study (EAGLES) trial, a double-blind, triple-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled randomized controlled trial. AIMS AND METHODS: Participants were from the U.S. cohort of the main trial and randomized (1:1:1:1) to varenicline, bupropion, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) patch, or placebo for 12 weeks with follow-up through week 24. Medical comorbidity data were derived from the baseline medical screening questionnaire and categorized into four subgroups (cardiac, respiratory, vascular, and diabetes). Within each comorbidity, generalized linear mixed models were used to assess the association between treatment and continuous abstinence rates from weeks 9-12 to 9-24. Similar models were used to test the effect of number of comorbidities on abstinence. RESULTS: Varenicline resulted in the highest week 12 abstinence rates across all pharmacotherapies and compared to placebo in all comorbidity subgroups: Cardiac (40.0% vs. 3.6%; odds ratios [OR] = 23.3 [5.1-107.1]), respiratory (24.7% vs. 12.8%; OR = 2.2 [1.3-3.8]), vascular (29.1% vs. 10.4%; OR = 3.6 [2.3-5.7]), and diabetes (30.9% vs. 8.3%; OR = 6.5 [2.3-19.0]). This was maintained at week 24 for those with cardiac (23.3% vs. 1.8%; OR = 21.7 [2.7-178.2]), vascular (18.9% vs. 7.1%; OR = 3.1 [1.8-5.3]), and diabetes (20.6% vs. 4.2%; OR = 8.4 [2.1-33.7]) comorbidities. Treatment contrasts within some comorbidity subgroups revealed superior efficacy of varenicline over other pharmacotherapies. All pharmacotherapies increased the odds of abstinence regardless of number of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Varenicline is the most efficacious option for patients with manageable cardiac, respiratory, vascular, and diabetes conditions to quit smoking, supporting recent clinical practice guidelines that recommend varenicline as first-line pharmacotherapy. Bupropion and NRT demonstrated efficacy for some comorbidity subgroups. IMPLICATIONS: This secondary analysis of the EAGLES trial demonstrated that varenicline is the most efficacious option for patients with cardiac, respiratory, vascular, and diabetes diagnoses to quit smoking. This demonstration of varenicline efficacy among individuals with comorbid medical conditions supports recent clinical practice guidelines that recommend varenicline as a first-line pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Humanos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Vareniclina , Bupropión/efectos adversos , Agonistas Nicotínicos/uso terapéutico , Dispositivos para Dejar de Fumar Tabaco/efectos adversos , Comorbilidad , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Benzazepinas/uso terapéutico , Quinoxalinas/uso terapéutico
20.
Acta Diabetol ; 61(3): 351-360, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37934231

RESUMEN

AIMS: The use of statins has been associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes. The characteristics of the population could influence this association. The objective of this study was to determine the risk of new-onset diabetes with the use of statins in patients in primary prevention, with an assessment of the results according to the baseline risk of developing diabetes of the included population. METHODS: We performed an updated meta-analysis including randomized trials of statin therapy in primary prevention settings that report new-onset diabetes. The rate of new cases of diabetes in the control arms was estimated for each study. The studies were classified into two groups (low rate: < 7.5 events per 1000 patients-year; high rate; ≥ 7.5 events per 1000 patients-year). The fixed-effects model was performed. RESULTS: Eight studies (70,453 patients) were included. Globally, statin therapy was associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.2, I2 35%). When we analyzed the studies according to the baseline diabetes risk in the control groups, the results showed that there was a greater risk only in the studies with a high baseline rate (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3, I2 0%; interaction p value = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Globally, the use of statins in patients in primary prevention was associated with an increased risk of new-onset diabetes. In the stratified analysis, this association was observed only in the group of studies with a high baseline rate of events.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Prevención Primaria , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA