RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic review and metaanalysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Ovid Medline databases was conducted to find randomized control trials (RCTs) or cohort studies that compared decompression alone and decompression plus fusion in single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis. Operation time; reoperation; postoperative complications; postoperative Oswestry disability index(ODI) scores and scores related to back and leg pain were collected from eligible studies for meta-analysis. RESULTS: We included 3 randomized controlled trials and 9 cohort studies with 6182 patients. The decompression alone group showed less operative time(P < 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss(p = 0.000), and no significant difference in postoperative complications was observed in randomized controlled trials(p = 0.428) or cohort studies(p = 0.731). There was no significant difference between the other two groups in reoperation(P = 0.071), postoperative ODI scores and scores related to back and leg pain. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that the decompression alone group performed better in terms of operation time and intraoperative blood loss, and there was no significant difference between the two surgical methods in rate of reoperation and postoperative complications, ODI, low back pain and leg pain. Therefore, we come to the conclusion that decompression alone is not inferior to decompression and fusion in patients with single-level lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Vértebras Lumbares , Fusión Vertebral , Estenosis Espinal , Espondilolistesis , Humanos , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Espondilolistesis/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tempo Operativo , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) after spinal surgery has recently attracted increasing attention. Patients with spinal metastases who undergo decompression with fixation are at a high risk of developing DVT. D-dimer levels indicate the risk of DVT, and the purpose of our study was to investigate D-dimer levels as a predictor of DVT perioperatively. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 100 patients with spinal metastases. D-dimer tests were performed twice: once before surgery and one day postoperatively. DVT was diagnosed by duplex ultrasonographic assessment of both lower extremities. Pulmonary embolisms (PEs) were diagnosed using multidetector computed tomography and pulmonary angiography. Perioperative serum D-dimer levels were compared between the DVT (+) and DVT (-) groups. The cutoff value of the D-dimer level was calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Preoperative and postoperative DVT prevalences were 8.0% (8/100) and 6.6% (6/91), respectively, and none of the patients developed PE. Before surgery, there was no significant differences in D-dimer levels between the pre-DVT (+) and pre-DVT (-) groups. After surgery, the D-dimer level one-day postoperatively for the post-DVT (+) group (17.6 ± 11.8 mg/L) was significantly higher than that of the post-DVT (-) group (5.0 ± 4.7 mg/L). The cutoff value of the postoperative D-dimer level was 9.51(mg/L), and the sensitivity and specificity for the optimum threshold were 83.3% and 89.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that preoperative D-dimer level may not be a predictor of DVT. Preoperative ultrasound examinations should be routinely performed in patients with spinal metastases. Postoperative D-dimer levels greater than 9.51(mg/L) are a predictive factor for the early diagnosis of DVT after spine surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Our study was registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No.ChiCTR2000029737). Registered 11 February 2020 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Trombosis de la Vena , Humanos , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/análisis , Femenino , Masculino , Trombosis de la Vena/sangre , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/sangre , Adulto , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/sangre , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Embolia Pulmonar/sangre , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Biomarcadores/sangreRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and complication rates of decompression with unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) and percutaneous endoscopy (PE) in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted up to April 2024 across multiple databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data, focusing on clinical studies that compare UBE with PE for posterior foraminotomy and discectomy decompression in CSR. The meta-analysis was performed with an emphasis on evaluating clinical outcomes such as operation time, blood loss, incision length, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for neck pain and arm pain, and complications. RESULTS: Out of an initial 1,041 studies identified from electronic databases, eight were deemed eligible based on title, abstract, and full-text screening. These studies involved 552 patients (269 males, 283 females; mean age: 53.9±11.4 years; range, 30 to 79 years), with 287 in the UBE group and 265 in the PE group. Meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in operation time between UBE and PE (mean difference [MD]=-3.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]:-19.38, 12.02; p=0.65). However, both blood loss (MD=17.01; 95% CI: 2.61, 31.41; p=0.02) and incision length (MD=11.62; 95% CI: 9.23, 14.01; p<0.00001) were significantly lower in the PE group compared to the UBE group. Regarding clinical outcomes, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of NDI (MD=0.12; 95% CI:-0.10, 0.34; 0.28), VAS for neck pain (MD=-0.06; 95% CI:-0.19, 0.06; p=0.32), VAS for arm pain (MD=-0.14; 95% CI:-0.26, -0.01; p=0.84), or complications (OR=1.07; 95% CI: 0.54, 2.10; p=0.85). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that there are no significant disparities in clinical outcomes between UBE and PE, encompassing NDI, VAS for arm pain, and VAS for neck pain, as well as complication rates. Notably, compared to PE, UBE results in increased bleeding and longer incision lengths when treating CSR, without substantially reducing operation time.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Endoscopía , Radiculopatía , Espondilosis , Humanos , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Endoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Radiculopatía/etiología , Radiculopatía/cirugía , Espondilosis/complicaciones , Espondilosis/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Glomus tympanicum and jugulare tumors are highly vascular and are therefore commonly embolized before surgical resection to prevent intra-operative bleeding. We report a case of facial nerve paralysis after pre-operative embolization for a glomus tympanicum tumor with ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH also known as Onyx) embolic agent. We discuss the choice of embolic agent in relation to the risk of this complication and potential management strategies. METHODS: A 57F with right glomus tympanicum developed right facial nerve palsy immediately after embolization. She received 24 mg of dexamethasone over the course of 24 h immediately following her embolization, surgical facial nerve decompression concurrent with tumor resection, and a 10-day prednisone taper. Our main outcome measure was facial nerve function on follow-up physical examinations. RESULTS: The patient developed right facial paralysis (HB 6/6) after Onyx embolization of branches of the external carotid artery system, likely due to translocation of embolic agent into facial nerve vasa nervosa as seen on post-embolization CT. No immediate improvement was observed with high dose steroids and decompression, however over the next 6 months her facial nerve function began to improve (HB 3/6). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical excision is the standard of care for glomus jugulare and glomus tympanicum tumors. Due to their propensity to bleed, their arterial feeders (branches of the external carotid) are often embolized prior to surgery, however, facial nerve paralysis is a rare but serious complication. There is a possible relationship between the choice of embolic agent and this complication. Though facial palsy is of sufficient rarity that no standard treatment pathway exists, due to the impact on a patient's quality of life, we recommend aggressive therapy to salvage nerve function.
Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Parálisis Facial , Polivinilos , Humanos , Femenino , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Polivinilos/administración & dosificación , Polivinilos/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Parálisis Facial/etiología , Parálisis Facial/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) are effective for treating thoracic myelopathy, surgical treatment has a high risk of various complications. There is currently no information available on the perioperative complications in thoracic ossification of the longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL) and thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (T-OLF). We evaluate the perioperative complication rate and cost between T-OPLL and T-OLF for patients underwent PDF. METHODS: Patients undergoing PDF for T-OPLL and T-OLF from 2012 to 2018 were detected in Japanese nationwide inpatient database. One-to-one propensity score matching between T-OPLL and T-OLF was performed based on patient characteristics and preoperative comorbidities. We examined systemic and local complication rate, reoperation rate, length of hospital stays, costs, discharge destination, and mortality after matching. RESULTS: In a total of 2,660 patients, 828 pairs of T-OPLL and T-OLF patients were included after matching. The incidence of systemic complications did not differ significantly between the T-OPLL and OLF groups. However, local complications were more frequently occurred in T-OPLL than in T-OLF groups (11.4% vs. 7.7% P = 0.012). Transfusion rates was also significantly higher in the T-OPLL group (14.1% vs. 9.4%, P = 0.003). T-OPLL group had longer hospital stay (42.2 days vs. 36.2 days, P = 0.004) and higher medical costs (USD 32,805 vs. USD 25,134, P < 0.001). In both T-OPLL and T-OLF, the occurrence of perioperative complications led to longer hospital stay and higher medical costs. While fewer patients in T-OPLL were discharged home (51.6% vs. 65.1%, P < 0.001), patients were transferred to other hospitals more frequently (47.5% vs. 33.5%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This research identified the perioperative complications of T-OPLL and T-OLF in PDF using a large national database, which revealed that the incidence of local complications was higher in the T-OPLL patients. Perioperative complications resulted in longer hospital stays and higher medical costs.
Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Ligamento Amarillo , Osificación del Ligamento Longitudinal Posterior , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Fusión Vertebral , Vértebras Torácicas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Ligamento Amarillo/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/economía , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Descompresión Quirúrgica/economía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Anciano , Osificación del Ligamento Longitudinal Posterior/cirugía , Osificación del Ligamento Longitudinal Posterior/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Japón/epidemiología , Osificación Heterotópica/cirugía , Osificación Heterotópica/economía , Osificación Heterotópica/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Reoperación/economía , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pacientes Internos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study analyzed the etiologies and treatment of iatrogenic occipital nerve injuries. METHODS: Patients with occipital neuralgia (ON) who were screened for occipital nerve decompression surgery were prospectively enrolled. Patients with iatrogenic occipital nerve injuries who underwent nerve decompression surgery were identified. Data included surgical history, pain characteristics, and surgical technique. Outcomes included pain frequency (days/month), duration (h/day), intensity (0-10), migraine headache index (MHI), and patient-reported percent-resolution of pain. RESULTS: Among the 416 patients with ON, who were screened for occipital nerve decompression surgery, 12 (2.9%) cases of iatrogenic occipital nerve injury were identified and underwent surgical treatment. Preoperative headache frequency was 30 (±0.0) days/month, duration was 19.4 (±6.9) h, and intensity was 9.2 (±0.9). Neuroma excision was performed in 5 cases followed by targeted muscle reinnervation in 3, nerve cap in 1, and muscle burial in 1. In patients without neuromas, greater occipital nerve decompression and/or lesser occipital nerve neurectomy were performed. At the median follow-up of 12 months (IQR 12-12 months), mean pain frequency was 4.0 (±6.6) pain days/month (p < 0.0001), duration was 6.3 (±8.9) h (p < 0.01), and intensity was 4.4 (±2.8) (p < 0.001). Median patient-reported resolution of pain was 85% (56.3%-97.5%) and success rate was (≥50% MHI improvement) 91.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Iatrogenic occipital nerve injuries can be caused by various surgical interventions, including craniotomies, cervical spine interventions, and scalp tumor resections. The associated pain can be severe and chronic. Iatrogenic ON should be considered in the differential diagnosis of post-operative headaches and can be treated with nerve decompression surgery or neuroma excision with reconstruction of the free nerve end.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Neuralgia , Humanos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuralgia/etiología , Neuralgia/cirugía , Adulto , Nervios Espinales/lesiones , Nervios Espinales/trasplante , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dimensión del Dolor , AncianoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Surgical decompression via transaxillary first rib resection (TFRR) is often performed in patients presenting with venous thoracic outlet syndrome (VTOS). We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of TFRR based on chronicity of completely occluded axillosubclavian veins in VTOS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective institutional review of all patients who underwent TFRR for VTOS and had a completely occluded axillosubclavian vein between 2003 and 2022. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the time of inciting VTOS event to TFRR acuity of their venous occlusion: <4 weeks, 4 to 12 weeks, and >12 weeks. We evaluated the association of TFRR timing with 1-year outcomes, including patency and symptomatic improvement. We used the χ2 test to compare baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 103 patients underwent TFRR for VTOS with a completely occluded axillosubclavian vein (median age, 30.0 years; 42.7% female; 8.8% non-White), of whom 28 had occlusion at <4 weeks, 36 had occlusion at 4 to 12 weeks, and 39 had occlusion at >12 weeks. Postoperative venogram performed 2 to 3 weeks after TFRR demonstrated that 78.6% in the <4 weeks group, 72.2% in the 4- to 12-weeks group, and 61.5% in the >12 weeks group had some degree of recanalization (P = .76). Postoperative balloon angioplasty was successfully performed in 60 patients with stenosed or occluded axillosubclavian vein at the time of postoperative venogram. At the 10- to 14-month follow-up, 79.2% of the <4 weeks group, 73.3% of the 4- to 12-weeks group, and 73.3% of the >12 weeks group had patent axillosubclavian veins based on duplex ultrasound examination (P = .86). Among patients who underwent postoperative balloon angioplasty, 80.0%, 85.0% and 100% in the <4 weeks, 4- to 12-weeks, and >12 weeks groups respectively demonstrated patency at 10 to 14 months (P = .31). Symptomatic improvement was reported in 95.7% in the <4 weeks group, 96.7% in the 4- to 12-weeks group, and 93.5% in the >12 weeks group (P = .84). CONCLUSIONS: TFRR offers excellent postoperative outcomes for patients with symptomatic VTOS, even in cases of completely occluded axillosubclavian veins, regardless of the chronicity of the occlusion. By 14 months, 95.2% of patients experienced symptomatic improvement, and 75% attained venous patency.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Osteotomía , Costillas , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Humanos , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/cirugía , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/fisiopatología , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Costillas/cirugía , Costillas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vena Axilar/cirugía , Vena Axilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Axilar/fisiopatología , Vena Subclavia/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Subclavia/cirugía , Vena Subclavia/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
CASE: A 37-year-old man American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 1 patient with lumbar canal stenosis at the L4-L5 level underwent endoscopic decompression. Toward the end of the procedure, the patient developed sudden-onset bradycardia, followed by ventricular arrhythmia and acute pulmonary edema. The patient was successfully managed with resuscitation and supportive management and recovered uneventfully thereafter. A diagnosis of perioperative stress cardiomyopathy was subsequently made after evaluation of the patient. CONCLUSION: The possibility of takotsubo cardiomyopathy should be considered in cases of acute perioperative cardiac decompensation and pulmonary edema in patients undergoing spinal surgery.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Espinal , Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo , Humanos , Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo/etiología , Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Masculino , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BACKGROUND: Interspinous process devices (IPD) were used as a treatment in selected patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). However, the use of IPD was still debated that it had significantly higher reoperation rates compared to traditional decompression. Therefore, the purpose of the meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IPD treatment in comparison to traditional treatment. METHODS: The databases were searched of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP Database and Wan Fang Database up to January 2024. Relevant studies were identified by using specific eligibility criteria and data was extracted and analyzed based on primary and secondary endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included (5 RCTs and 8 retrospective studies). There was no significant difference of Oswestey Disability Index (ODI) score in the last follow-up (MDâ =â -3.81, 95% CI: -8.91-1.28, Pâ =â .14). There was significant difference of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back pain scoring in the last follow-up (MDâ =â -1.59, 95% CI: -3.09--0.09, Pâ =â .04), but there existed no significant difference of leg pain in the last follow-up (MDâ =â -2.35, 95% CI: -6.15-1.45, Pâ =â .23). What's more, operation time, bleeding loss, total complications and reoperation rate had no significant difference. However, IPD had higher device problems (odds ratio [OR]â =â 9.00, 95% CI: 2.39-33.91, Pâ =â .001) and lesser dural tears (ORâ =â 0.32, 95% CI: 0.15-0.67, Pâ =â .002) compared to traditional decompression. CONCLUSION: Although IPD had lower back pain score and lower dural tears compared with traditional decompression, current evidence indicated no superiority for patient-reported outcomes for IPD compared with alone decompression treatment. However, these findings needed to be verified in further by multicenter, double-blind and large sample RCTs.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Vértebras Lumbares , Estenosis Espinal , Humanos , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/instrumentación , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dimensión del DolorRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Each institution or physician has to decide on an individual basis whether to continue or discontinue antiplatelet (AP) therapy before spinal surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine if perioperative AP continuation is safe during single-level microsurgical decompression (MSD) for treating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and lumbar disc hernia (LDH) without selection bias. METHODS: Patients who underwent single-level MSD for LSS and LDH between April 2018 to December 2022 at our institute were included in this retrospective study. We collected data regarding baseline characteristics, medical history/comorbidities, epidural hematoma (EDH) volume, reoperation for EDH, differences between preoperative and one-day postoperative blood cell counts (ΔRBC), hemoglobin (ΔHGB), and hematocrits (ΔHCT), and perioperative thromboembolic complications. Patients were divided into two groups: the AP continuation group received AP treatment before surgery and the control group did not receive antiplatelet medication before surgery. Propensity scores for receiving AP agents were calculated, with one-to-one matching of estimated propensity scores to adjust for patient baseline characteristics and past histories. Reoperation for EDH, EDH volume, ΔRBC, ΔHGB, ΔHCT, and perioperative thromboembolic complications were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The 303 enrolled patients included 41 patients in the AP continuation group. After propensity score matching, the rate of reoperation for EDH, the EDH volume, ΔRBC, ΔHGB, ΔHCT, and perioperative thromboembolic complication rates were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Perioperative AP continuation is safe for single-level lumbar MSD, even without biases.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral , Vértebras Lumbares , Microcirugia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Estenosis Espinal , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Anciano , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Microcirugia/métodos , Microcirugia/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Sesgo de Selección , Herniorrafia/métodos , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento , Atención Perioperativa/métodosRESUMEN
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is widely used to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis because it provides definitive decompression and fixation. Although it has several advantages, it has some disadvantages and risks, such as paraspinal muscle injury, potential intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, hardware failure, subsidence, and medical comorbidity. Lumbar decompressive bilateral laminectomy with interspinous fixation (DLISF) is less invasive and can be used on some patients with PLIF, but this has not been reported. To compare the efficacy and safety of DLISF in the treatment of low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with that of PLIF. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 81 patients with grade I spondylolisthesis, who had undergone PLIF or DLISF and were followed up for more than 1 year. Surgical outcomes, visual analog scale, radiologic outcomes, including Cobb angle and difference in body translation, and postoperative complications were assessed. Forty-one patients underwent PLIF, whereas 40 underwent DLISF. The operative times were 271.0â ±â 57.2 and 150.6â ±â 29.3 minutes for the PLIF and DLISF groups, respectively. The estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the PLIF group versus the DLISF group (290.7â ±â 232.6 vs 122.2â ±â 82.7 mL, Pâ <â .001). Body translation did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Overall pain improved during the 1-year follow-up when compared with baseline data. Medical complications were significantly lower in the DLISF group, whereas perioperative complications and hardware issues were higher in the PLIF group. The outcomes of DLISF, which is less invasive, were comparable to PLIF outcomes in patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis. As a salvage technique, DLISF may be a good option when compared with PLIF.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Vértebras Lumbares , Fusión Vertebral , Espondilolistesis , Humanos , Espondilolistesis/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/instrumentación , Proyectos Piloto , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Laminectomía/métodos , Laminectomía/efectos adversos , Tempo OperativoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: At present, the core decompression (CD) has become the main surgical procedure for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH); however, the CD surgery requires high operator experience and repeated fluoroscopy increases the radiation damage to patients, and medical staff. This article compares the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted and freehand CD for ONFH by meta-analysis. METHODS: Computer searches of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, WanFang, and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database were conducted from the time of database inception to November 15, 2023. The literature on the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted and freehand CD in the treatment of ONFH was collected. Two researchers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and strictly evaluated the quality of the included literature. Outcome measures encompassed operative duration, intraoperative blood loss volume, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopies, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Harris hip score (HHS), complications, and radiographic progression. Data synthesis was carried out using Review Manager 5.4.1 software. The quality of evidence was evaluated according to Grades of Recommendation Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) standards. RESULTS: Seven retrospective cohort studies involving 355 patients were included in the study. The results of meta-analysis showed that in the robot-assisted group, the operative duration (MD = -17.60, 95% CI: -23.41 to -11.78, P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss volume (MD = -19.98, 95% CI: -28.84 to -11.11, P < 0.001), frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopies (MD = -6.60, 95% CI: -9.01 to -4.20, P < 0.001), and ΔVAS score (MD = -0.45, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.22, P < 0.001) were significantly better than those in the freehand group. The GRADE evidence evaluation showed ΔVAS score as low quality and other indicators as very low quality. There was no significant difference in the terms of ΔHHS (MD = 0.51, 95% CI: -1.34 to 2.35, P = 0.59), complications (RR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.03 to 2.74, P = 0.29), and radiographic progression (RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.02, P = 0.06) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: There is limited evidence showing the benefit of robot-assisted therapy for treatment of ONFH patients, and much of it is of low quality. Therefore, caution should be exercised in interpreting these results. It is recommended that more high-quality studies be conducted to validate these findings in future studies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ #recordDetails, CRD42023420593.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/cirugía , Necrosis de la Cabeza Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Tempo OperativoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic spine surgery has recently grown in popularity due to the potential benefits of reduced pain and faster recovery time as compared to open surgery. Biportal spinal endoscopy has been successfully applied to lumbar disc herniations and lumbar spinal stenosis. Obesity is associated with increased risk of complications in spine surgery. Few prior studies have investigated the impact of obesity and associated medical comorbidities with biportal spinal endoscopy. METHODS: This study was a prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed comparative cohort design. Patients were divided into cohorts of normal body weight (Bone Mass Index (BMI)18.0-24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9) and obese (BMI > 30.0) as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). Patients underwent biportal spinal endoscopy by a single surgeon at a single institution for treatment of lumbar disc herniations and lumbar spinal stenosis. Demographic data, surgical complications, and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. Statistics were calculated amongst treatment groups using analysis of variance and chi square where appropriate. Statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients were followed. 26 (30.1%) were normal BMI, 35 (41.7%) were overweight and 23 (27.4%) were obese. Patients with increasing BMI had correspondingly greater American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores. There were no significant differences in VAS Back, VAS Leg, and ODI scores, or postoperative complications among the cohorts. There were no cases of surgical site infections in the cohort. All cohorts demonstrated significant improvement up to 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that obesity is not a risk factor for increased perioperative complications with biportal spinal endoscopy and has similar clinical outcomes and safety profile as compared to patients with normal BMI. Biportal spinal endoscopy is a promising alternative to traditional techniques to treat common lumbar pathology.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Endoscopía , Vértebras Lumbares , Obesidad , Estenosis Espinal , Humanos , Obesidad/cirugía , Obesidad/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Endoscopía/métodos , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis investigates the outcomes of laminoplasty (LP) and laminectomy with fusion (LF) to guide effective patient selection for these 2 procedures. BACKGROUND: Although LF traditionally offers the ability for excellent posterior decompression, it may alter cervical spine biomechanics and increase the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. LP aims to preserve the natural kinematics of the spine but has not been universally accepted, and may be associated with inadequate decompression, neck pain, and recurrent stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) were searched up until March 2024. The outcomes studied were surgery-related outcomes [operative time (OR) time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and length of stay], adverse events (overall complications, C5 palsy, and reoperations), radiographic outcomes (cervical lordosis, cervical sagittal vertical axis, and T1 slope angle), and patient-reported outcome measures (Neck Disability Index, Visual Analog Scale for neck pain, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association). RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included in this meta-analysis, of which 19 were retrospective studies, 2 were prospective nonrandomized studies, and 1 was a randomized controlled trial. A total of 2128 patients were included, with 1025 undergoing LP and 1103 undergoing LF. Patients undergoing LP experienced significantly shorter operative time ( P = 0.009), less EBL ( P = 0.02), a lower rate of overall complications ( P < 0.00001) and C5 palsy ( P = 0.003), a lower T1 slope angle ( P = 0.02), and a lower Neck Disability Index ( P = 0.0004). No significant difference was observed in the remaining outcomes. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates that for cervical myelopathy, LP has the benefits of shorter operative time time, less EBL, and reduced incidence of C5 palsy as well as overall complication rate. Given these findings, LP remains an important surgical option with a favorable complication profile in patients with cervical myelopathy, although careful patient selection is still paramount in choosing the right procedure for individual patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales , Laminectomía , Laminoplastia , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Laminectomía/efectos adversos , Laminectomía/métodos , Laminoplastia/efectos adversos , Laminoplastia/métodos , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The physical demands of sports can place patients at elevated risk of use-related pathologies, including thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Overhead athletes in particular (eg, baseball and football players, swimmers, divers, and weightlifters) often subject their subclavian vessels and brachial plexuses to repetitive trauma, resulting in venous effort thrombosis, arterial occlusions, brachial plexopathy, and more. This patient population is at higher risk for Paget-Schroetter syndrome, or effort thrombosis, although neurogenic TOS (nTOS) is still the predominant form of the disease among all groups. First-rib resection is almost always recommended for vascular TOS in a young, active population, although a surgical benefit for patients with nTOS is less clear. Practitioners specializing in upper extremity disorders should take care to differentiate TOS from other repetitive use-related disorders, including shoulder orthopedic injuries and nerve entrapments at other areas of the neck and arm, as TOS is usually a diagnosis of exclusion. For nTOS, physical therapy is a cornerstone of diagnosis, along with response to injections. Most patients first undergo some period of nonoperative management with intense physical therapy and training before proceeding with rib resection. It is particularly essential for ensuring that athletes can return to their baselines of flexibility, strength, and stamina in the upper extremity. Botulinum toxin and lidocaine injections in the anterior scalene muscle might predict which patients will likely benefit from first-rib resection. Athletes are usually satisfied with their decisions to undergo first-rib resection, although the risk of rare but potentially career- or life-threatening complications, such as brachial plexus injury or subclavian vessel injury, must be considered. Frequently, they are able to return to the same or a higher level of play after full recovery.
Asunto(s)
Atletas , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/terapia , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/fisiopatología , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/etiología , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/cirugía , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Recuperación de la Función , Traumatismos en Atletas/terapia , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Traumatismos en Atletas/fisiopatología , Osteotomía/efectos adversos , Volver al Deporte , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Modalidades de FisioterapiaRESUMEN
Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) consists of a group of disorders resulting from compression of the neurovascular bundle exiting through the thoracic outlet. TOS can be classified as follows based on the etiology of the pathophysiology: neurogenic TOS, venous TOS, arterial TOS, and mixed TOS. The constellation of symptoms a patient may experience varies, depending on the structures involved. Due to the wide range of etiologies and presenting symptoms, treatments for TOS also differ. Furthermore, most studies focus on the perioperative and short-term outcomes after surgical decompression for TOS. This systematic review aimed to provide a pooled analysis of studies to better understand the intermediate and long-term outcomes of surgical decompression for TOS. We conducted a systematic literature search in the Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases for studies that analyzed long-term outcomes after surgical decompression for TOS. The inclusion period was from January 2015 to May 2023. The primary outcome was postoperative QuickDASH Outcome Measure scores. A total of 16 studies were included in the final analysis. The differences between postoperative and preoperative QuickDASH Outcome Measure scores were calculated, when possible, and there was a mean overall difference of 33.5 points (95% CI, 25.2-41.8; Pâ¯=â¯.001) after surgical decompression. There was a higher proportion of excellent outcomes reported for patients undergoing intervention for arterial and mixed TOS etiologies, whereas those with venous and neurogenic etiologies had the lowest proportion of excellent outcomes reported. Patients with neurogenic TOS had the highest proportion of poor outcomes reported. In conclusion, surgical decompression for TOS has favorable long-term outcomes, especially in patients with arterial and mixed etiologies.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Recuperación de la Función , Factores de Riesgo , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/cirugía , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/fisiopatología , Síndrome del Desfiladero Torácico/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical efficacy of mini-open (air/water medium) endoscopy-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (MOEA-ACDF) and anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS: This study retrospectively analysed the clinical data of CSM patients who received surgical treatment from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical method: the MOEA-ACDF group and the ACDF group. The preoperative and postoperative imaging results at one week and the last follow-up examination were compared between the two groups. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and neck disability index (NDI) score were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes preoperatively, one week postoperatively and at the last follow-up examination. The minimum follow-up duration was 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 131 CSM patients who underwent surgery at our institution were included, including 61 patients in the MOEA-ACDF group and 70 patients in the ACDF group. In the MOEA-ACDF group, the postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle and HAVB were significantly greater than the preoperative values (P < 0.05). In the ACDF group, the postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle was also significantly greater than the preoperative value, and the C2-C7 ROM and HAVB significantly decreased (P < 0.05). The postoperative neurological function of the patients in both groups improved, and the postoperative VAS score and NDI score significantly decreased. Compared with ACDF, MOEA-ACDF is associated with a significantly larger postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle and significantly better C2-C7 ROM and HAVB, as well as better clinical efficacy (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: MOEA-ACDF combines endoscopic systems with ACDF technology to treat CSM, but its clinical efficacy is not inferior to that of ACDF in the short- to intermediate-term. It can effectively and safely restore the cervical intervertebral height, physiological curvature, and range of motion.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales , Discectomía , Endoscopía , Fusión Vertebral , Espondilosis , Humanos , Masculino , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Discectomía/métodos , Discectomía/efectos adversos , Espondilosis/cirugía , Espondilosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Endoscopía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Adulto , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin is an effective treatment for hemifacial spasm in elderly patients. However, some patients do not tolerate the side effects and frequency of botulinum toxin treatments. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of a cohort of elderly patients referred by neurologists for surgical decompression of the facial nerve following botulinum toxin treatment. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, logistic regression was used to detect potential predictors of spasm-freedom after surgical decompression of the facial nerve in elderly patients that received ≤8 and >8 botulinum toxin treatments for hemifacial spasm before surgery. Age, sex, side, preoperative symptom duration, and preoperative botulinum toxin treatment were assessed as potential predictors of spasm-freedom at last follow-up. RESULTS: Of 76 elderly patients with hemifacial spasm treated with botulinum toxin and microvascular decompression, with at least 2-years of follow-up (median, 44.5 months), 84.2% were spasm-free at last follow-up. Age (P = 0.38), sex (P = 0.59), side (P = 0.15), preoperative symptom duration (P = 0.7), and number of preoperative botulinum toxin treatments (P = 0.3) were not predictors of long-term spasm-freedom. Permanent ipsilateral hearing loss was the most frequent complication (3.9%). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that elderly patients can undergo botulinum toxin treatment for hemifacial spasm without compromising their likelihood of achieving spasm-freedom with future surgical decompression. Therefore, surgical decompression of the facial nerve is an effective therapy for elderly patients with hemifacial spasm refractory to botulinum toxin.
Asunto(s)
Espasmo Hemifacial , Humanos , Espasmo Hemifacial/cirugía , Espasmo Hemifacial/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Neuromusculares/administración & dosificación , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Toxinas Botulínicas/uso terapéutico , Toxinas Botulínicas/administración & dosificación , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administración & dosificación , Nervio Facial/cirugía , Nervio Facial/efectos de los fármacos , Nervio Facial/fisiopatología , Estudios de Cohortes , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a prevalent disorder, and surgery for LSS is a common procedure. Postoperative complications occur after any surgery and impose costs for society and costs and additional morbidity for patients. Since complications are relatively rare, medical registries of large populations may provide valuable knowledge. However, recording of complications in registries can be incomplete. To better estimate the true prevalence of complications after LSS surgery, we reviewed two different sources of data and recorded complications for a sample of Norwegian LSS patients. METHODS: 474 patients treated surgically for LSS during 2015 and 2016 at four hospitals reported to a national spine registry (NORspine). Postoperative complications were recorded by patients in NORspine, and we cross-referenced complications documented in NORspine with the patients´ electronic patient records (EPR) to re-test the complication rates. We performed descriptive statistics of complication rates using the two different data sources above, and analyzed the association between postoperative complications and clinical outcome with logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean (95%CI) patient age was 66.3 (65.3-67.2) years, and 254 (53.6%) were females. All patients were treated with decompression, and 51 (10.7%) received an additional fusion during the index surgery. Combining the two data sources, we found a total rate for postoperative complications of 22.4%, the NORspine registry reported a complication rate of 15.6%, and the EPR review resulted in a complication rate of 16.0%. However, the types of complications were inconsistent across the two data sources. According to NORspine, the frequency of reoperation within 90 days was 0.9% and according to EPR 3.4%. The rates of wound infection were for NORspine 3.1% and EPR review 2.1%. There was no association between postoperative complication and patient reported outcome. CONCLUSION: Postoperative complications occurred in 22% of LSS patients. The frequency of different postoperative complications differed between the two data sources.
Asunto(s)
Descompresión Quirúrgica , Vértebras Lumbares , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Sistema de Registros , Fusión Vertebral , Estenosis Espinal , Humanos , Estenosis Espinal/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/métodos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Noruega/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fuentes de InformaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, there have been no studies examining peroneal nerve decompression and proximal fibular osteochondroma excision exclusively in patients with multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indications, complications, and recurrence associated with nerve decompression and proximal fibular osteochondroma excision in patients with MHE. METHODS: The records on patients with MHE undergoing peroneal nerve decompression from 2009 to 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Indications, clinical status, surgical technique, recurrence, and complications were recorded and were analyzed using the Fisher exact test, logistic regression, and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: There were 126 limbs identified in patients with MHE who underwent peroneal nerve decompression. The most common indications were pain over the proximal fibula, tibialis anterior and/or extensor hallucis longus weakness, and dysesthesias and/or neuropathic pain. Seven cases experienced postoperative foot drop as a complication of the decompression and osteochondroma excision. Logistic regression found significant relationships between complications and excision of anterior osteochondromas (odds ratio [OR], 5.21; p = 0.0062), proximal fibular excision (OR, 14.73; p = 0.0051), and previous decompression (OR, 5.77; p = 0.0124). The recurrence rate was 13.8%, and all recurrences occurred in patients who were skeletally immature at the index procedure. The probability of skeletally immature patients not experiencing recurrence was 88% at 3 years postoperatively and 73% at 6 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Indications for peroneal nerve decompression included neurologic symptoms and pain. The odds of a complication increased with excision of anterior osteochondromas and previous decompression. Recurrence of symptoms following decompression and osteochondroma excision was found exclusively in skeletally immature patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.