RESUMEN

Disc nucleus replacement (NR) is a challenging surgical technique used as a medical treatment for early-stage disc herniation to restore disc height and the biomechanical function of a motion segment, which may reduce low back pain. The surgical procedure involves the removal and replacement of the degenerated nucleus pulposus with a substitute by accessing the annulus fibrosos via a created hole. Over the decades, nucleus replacement has been an important issue, leading to the development of different substitute alternatives. The first ideas are dated to the 1950s and since then, more than a hundred nucleus replacement concepts can be identified. There were numerous attempts and several clinical trials; however, after more than 70 years of research, no gold standard for nucleus pulposus replacement has been identified. This review aims to collect the different nucleus replacements reported in the literature, thus understanding what failed, what could be improved and what are the opportunities for the future. A systematic review of the literature was performed using a keyword-based search on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to detect all nucleus replacements presented in the past by clinicians and engineers. Several studies were extracted from which the main nucleus replacements over the years were investigated, including the ones that received CE mark, FDA approval, or IDE approval and, also those involved in clinical trials. A total of 116 studies were included in this review. The extracted data concern the nucleus replacements proposed over the years to create a historical background as complete as possible, including their mechanical and biomechanical characterization and the clinical trials conducted over the years. Nucleus disc arthroplasty has been explored for many years. Unfortunately, even today there is still nothing safe and definitive in this surgical practice. This review provides an overview of the nucleus replacement history. A breakthrough could be the improvements in technologies for the annulus fibrous closing or sealing and the tissue engineering and medical regenerative techniques which could certainly ensure a higher NR implantation success rate in the future of this clinical treatment. It is not yet clear what is the future of this clinical practice. Only scientific research can answer the question: is the nucleus replacement still a possible clinical solution?

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A mismatch in footprints of cervical total disc arthroplasty (CTDA) implants occasionally occurred in Asian population and it had been attributed solely to ethnic factor. Yet, cervical degeneration process may play a role. Our purpose was to compare the cervical vertebra morphometric data with and without degeneration. The study included patients with CT scans of cervical spine from our hospital between January, 2019, and September, 2021. The total cervical degenerative index (TCDI) of each patient were collected by adding CDI score for 5 disc-levels. Patients were categorized into normal (TCDI 0-5) and degeneration groups (TCDI 6-60). Various measurements of the C3-C7 vertebral body and endplate were taken. Forty-nine patients in the normal group and 55 in the degeneration group were included. No significant difference was noted in gender, BH, BW, or BMI except age and TCDI (p < .001). During degeneration, disproportional endplate size changes were observed, with an increment ratio of 12-20% in the anteroposterior and 5-17% in the mediolateral plane throughout C3-C7, while vertebral body height remained constant. In conclusion, degeneration process, besides ethnic factor, causes the endplate size and shape mismatch. This information can help spine surgeon choose appropriate implants in CTDA surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block could play a role in the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with multilevel cervical disease following selective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided selected nerve root block as a diagnostic tool (study group) or not (control group), but both groups had surgery. Pain evaluation for arm and neck pain was recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, Neck Disability Index, and MRI results were compared between groups. They were assessed every two weeks for three months, postoperatively. The percentage of patients who showed ≥ 50% reduction in their pain levels and a VAS rating of ≤2 was deemed an acceptable surgical outcome. RESULTS: Patients in the study group had significantly lower VAS scores for pain intensity than control patients at nearly all periods. This baseline pain improved significantly in the study group. A more significant proportion of patients in the study group showed a ≥50% reduction in their pain scores from baseline at weeks four, eight, and 12, and this difference was significantly lower than in the control group (P<0.05). The study group improved significantly over baseline in Neck Disability Index scores compared to control patients. Patients were highly satisfied with no significant adverse events in the study group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multilevel cervical disease, ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block is an excellent, safe, non-radiating, and reliable test to determine the appropriate level for operation.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively compared short-term clinical outcomes and complications of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MIS-TLIF)and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion(Endo-LIF))for two-segmental lumbar degenerative disease, aiming to guide spine surgeons in selecting surgical approaches. METHODS: From January 2019 to December 2023, 30 patients were enrolled,15 in the MIS-TLIF group and 15 in the Endo-LIF group. All patients were followed up for more than 3 months after surgery and the following information was recorded: (1)surgery time, difference in hemoglobin between preoperative and postoperative, surgical costs, first time out of bed after operation, postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative complication; (2) ODI score (The Oswestry Disability Index), leg and back VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale), and lumbar vertebra JOA score (Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores); (3) MacNab score at final follow-up to assess clinical outcome, CT to evaluate lumbar fusion. RESULTS: There were significant differences between the two groups regarding operation time and cost, with the MIS-TLIF group performing significantly better. Intraoperative bleeding was considerably less in the Endo-LIF group compared to the MIS-TLIF group. However, there were no significant differences in the time of the first postoperative ambulation, postoperative hospitalization time, and postoperative complications. There was no significant difference in preoperative VAS, ODI, and JOA between the two surgical groups There were no significant differences in VAS(leg), ODI, and JOA scores between the two groups before and at 1 day,7 days, 1 month, 3 months and final follow-up. However, at 1 day postoperatively, the VAS( back)score in the Endo-LIF group was lower than that in the MIS-TLIF group, and the difference was statistically significant. At the final follow-up, all patients achieved grade III and above according to the Bridwell criteria, and there was no significant difference between the two surgical groups compared to each other. According to the MacNab score at the final follow-up, the excellent rate was 80.00% in the Endo-LIF group and 73.33% in the MIS-TLIF group, with no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in short-term efficacy and safety between Endo-LIF and MIS-TLIF for two-segment degenerative lumbar diseases. MIS-TLIF has a shorter operative time and lower costs, while Endo-LIF causes less tissue damage, blood loss, and early postoperative pain, aiding long-term recovery. Both MIS-TLIF and Endo-LIF are promising for treating two-segment lumbar degenerative disease. The choice of a surgical procedure depends on the patient's financial situation, their ability to tolerate surgery, and the surgeon's expertise.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Lumbar degenerative diseases impose a substantial health burden, prompting the exploration of advanced surgical approaches such as Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF). This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the comparative efficacy of OLIF with anterior screw fixation (OLIF-AF) against OLIF with posterior pedicle fixation (OLIF-PF) in addressing these conditions. METHODS: A systematic search across multiple databases identified five studies meeting inclusion criteria, incorporating a total of 271 patients. Comparative analysis encompasses primary and secondary outcomes related to fusion rates, intraoperative parameters, patient-reported measures, and radiographic assessments. RESULTS: Primary outcome analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in total fusion rates between OLIF-AF and OLIF-PF. However, secondary outcomes revealed distinct advantages in OLIF-AF, showcasing lower intraoperative blood loss and reduced operative times compared to OLIF-PF. Nonetheless, patient-reported outcomes, encompassing measures such as pain scores and functional assessments, as well as radiographic parameters, exhibited no significant variations between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: While OLIF-AF displayed favorable results in intraoperative parameters, such as reduced blood loss and shorter operative times, it did not significantly differ in patient-reported outcomes and radiographic assessments compared to OLIF-PF. Interpretation of findings must consider limitations in sample sizes and study heterogeneity. Future investigations with larger, more diverse cohorts and extended follow-ups are imperative to confirm these preliminary findings and comprehend the actual clinical impact of these OLIF techniques in managing lumbar degenerative diseas.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Percutaneous lumbar nucleoplasty (PLN) and intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) are effective treatment options for discogenic low back pain (D-LBP). We evaluated the effectiveness of PLN and IDET and the positive predictive factors associated with intradiscal procedures. We reviewed the medical records of 205 patients who underwent IDET or PLN in patients with D-LBP followed by positive provocation discography. A successful outcome was defined as ≥ 50% pain relief on the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score at the 6-month follow-up visit. The relationship between the outcome of the intradiscal procedure and clinical variables was investigated using multivariate analyses. Of the 142 patients (89 with PLN and 53 with IDET), 86 (60.5%) experienced a successful outcome, which was more substantial in PLN (n = 61, 68.5%) than in IDET (n = 25, 47.2%; P = .010). The high-grade Modified Dallas Discogram Scale in provocation discography and a procedure at the L3/L4 spinal level were independent positive predictors of successful outcomes (P = .023 and .010, respectively). Coexisting psychiatric disorders, such as depression and anxiety, were negative predictors of successful treatment (P = .007). No serious complications related to the intradiscal procedures were reported during the 6-month follow-up period. PLN and IDET might be effective for managing low back pain (LBP) from internal disc disruption (IDD). The high-grade Modified Dallas Discogram, a procedure at the L3/4 spinal level, and the absence of neuropsychiatric disorders could be positive factors for the successful outcome of the intradiscal procedure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Effective internal fixation with pedicle screw is a key factor in the success of lumbar fusion with internal fixation. Whether navigation robots can improve the efficacy and safety of screw placement is controversial. Thirty-eight patients who underwent oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion internal fixation from March 2022 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, 16 cases in the navigational robot group and 22 cases in the fluoroscopy group. Using visual analog score (VAS) for the low back and lower limbs, Oswestry Disability Index to compare the clinical efficacy of the 2 groups; using perioperative indexes such as the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and postoperative hospital stay to compare the safety of the 2 groups; and using accuracy of pedicle screws (APS) and the facet joint violation (FJV) to compare the accuracy of the 2 groups. Postoperative follow-up at least 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in the baseline data (P > .05). The navigational robot group's VAS-back was significantly lower than the fluoroscopy group at 3 days postoperatively (P < .05). However, the differences between the 2 groups in VAS-back at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, and in VAS-leg and Oswestry Disability Index at 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively were not significant (P > .05). Although duration of surgery in the navigational robot group was significantly longer than in the fluoroscopy group (P > .05), the intraoperative blood loss and the intraoperative fluoroscopy times were significantly lower than in the fluoroscopy group (P < .05). The difference in the PHS between the 2 groups was not significant (P > .05). The APS in the navigation robot group was significantly higher than in the fluoroscopy group, and the rate of FJV was significantly lower than in the fluoroscopy group (P < .05). Compared with the traditional fluoroscopic technique, navigation robot-assisted lumbar interbody fusion with internal fixation provides less postoperative low back pain in the short term, with less trauma, less bleeding, and lower radiation exposure, as well as better APS and lower FJV, resulting in better clinical efficacy and safety.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term consequences on the cervical spine after Anterior transcorporeal percutaneous endoscopy cervical discectomy (ATc-PECD) from the biomechanical standpoint. METHODS: A three-dimensional model of the normal cervical spine C2-T1 was established using finite element method. Subsequently, a disc degeneration model and degeneration with surgery model were constructed on the basis of the normal model. The same loading conditions were applied to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation of the cervical spine. We calculated the cervical range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure, and intravertebral body pressure under different motions for observing changes in cervical spine biomechanics after surgery. At the same time, we combined the results of a long-term follow-up of the ATc-PECD, and used imaging methods to measure vertebral and disc height and cervical mobility, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and visual analog scale (VAS) score were used to assess pain relief and neurological functional recovery. RESULTS: The long-term follow-up results revealed that preoperative JOA score, neck VAS score, hand VAS score, IDH, VBH, and ROM for patients were 9.49 ± 2.16, 6.34 ± 1.68, 5.14 ± 1.48, 5.95 ± 0.22 mm, 15.41 ± 1.68 mm, and 52.46 ± 9.36° respectively. It changed to 15.71 ± 1.13 (P < 0.05), 1.02 ± 0.82 (P < 0.05), 0.77 ± 0.76 (P < 0.05), 4.73 ± 0.26 mm (P < 0.05), 13.67 ± 1.48 mm (P < 0.05), and 59.26 ± 6.72° (P < 0.05), respectively, at 6 years postoperatively. Finite element analysis showed that after establishing the cervical spondylosis model, the overall motion range for flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation decreased by 3.298°, 0.753°, 3.852°, and 1.131° respectively. Conversely, after establishing the bone tunnel model, the motion range for these actions increased by 0.843°, 0.65°, 0.278°, and 0.488° respectively, consistent with the follow-up results. Moreover, analysis of segmental motion changes revealed that the increased cervical spine mobility was primarily contributed by the surgical model segments. Additionally, the finite element model demonstrated that bone tunneling could lead to increased stress within the vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs of the surgical segments. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up studies have shown that ATc-PECD has good clinical efficacy and that ATc-PECD can be used as a complementary method for CDH treatment. The FEM demonstrated that ATc-PECD can lead to increased internal stresses in the vertebral body and intervertebral discs of the operated segments, which is directly related to cervical spine degeneration after ATc-PECD.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Non-contiguous two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) may be a viable option for patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy and imaging-evident spine and radicular compression at two non-contiguous cervical levels. The risk of hastening degeneration and triggering Adjacent Segment Disease at the spine levels located between the fused levels is a putative adverse event, which was assessed in a few studies. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing non-contiguous two levels ACDF and to assess biomechanical modifications at non-fused segments. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with noncontiguous two-level spine and radicular compression, who underwent simultaneous noncontiguous two-level ACDF at our center. We analyzed clinical and radiological outcomes and investigated the rate of adjacent segment disease. Radiographic parameters were calculated on pre- and postoperative images. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent simultaneous noncontiguous two-level ACDF for cervical myelo-radiculopathy between 2015 and 2021 and were followed up for a mean period of 43.3 months. For all patients, the mJOA score significantly improved from 14.57 ± 2.3 to 16.5 ± 2.1 (p<0.01) and the NDI score significantly decreased from 21.45 ± 4.3 to 12.8 ± 2.3 (p<0.01) postoperatively. Cervical lordosis increased after surgery (from 9.65° ±9.47 to 15.12° ± 6.09); intermediate disc height decreased (5.68 mm ± 0.57 to 5.27 mm ±0.98); the ROMs of intermediate (from 12.45 ± 2.33 to 14.77 ± 1.98), cranial (from 14.63 ± 1.59 to 15.71 ± 1.02), and caudal (from 11.58 ± 2.32 to 13.33 ± 2.67) segments slightly increased. During follow-up assessment, in one patient the myelopathy worsened due to spine compression at the intermediate level. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous and non-contiguous two-level ACDF is a safe and effective procedure. The occurrence of postoperative adjacent and intermediate segment disease is rare.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In adult patients affected by degenerative disc disease with lumbar instability and chronic low back pain, spine surgery with lumbar fixation aims to reduce segmental instability and pain. Different techniques have been developed, but the optimal surgical technique remains controversial. No studies have compared the clinical and radiological outcomes between stand-alone pedicle screw fixation (SAPF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). This was a retrospective study. All patients who underwent surgery for single-level L4-L5 or L5-S1 lumbar stenosis, associated with minor lumbar instability and treated with SAPF or MI-TLIF techniques were included in the study. Data were collected preoperatively and at 24 monts follow-up. Clinical primary outcomes were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction, walking ability and self reported back and leg pain. In addition, perioperative data and complications were recorded. Segmental lordosis (L4-L5 and L5-S1) and overall lumbar lordosis (L1-S1) were measured on lumbar X-Rays preoperatively and at least 24 months postoperatively. 277 patients were firstly identified. Baseline data and a minimum of two-year follow-up were available for 62 patients. After the propensity score matching, 44 patients (22 patients in the SAPF group and 22 patients in the MI-TLIF group) were matched. At 24 months follow-up, no difference between the two groups of patients in NRS (p = 0.11) and ODI scores (p = 0.21) were observed. Patients' satisfaction at follow-up was also not significantly different between the two groups. In both groups, a significant improvement in the walked distance was observed after surgery (p = 0.05) while no difference was observed regarding the type of surgery performed (p = 1.00). No differences were found in the pre- and post-operative median lumbar lordosis (p = 0.91 and p = 0.67) and the same findings were observed for lumbar segmental lordosis (p = 0.65 and p = 0.41 respectively). Significant improvements in ODI and NRS-scores were recorded after 24 months follow-up with both SAPF and MI-TLIF. No significant differences in postoperative PROMs and patients' satisfaction were observed between the groups. The results of our study indicate no superiority of either surgical technique concerning pain and functional outcomes after 24 months.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lumbar degenerative disease (LDD) is one of the main causes of low back pain in the elderly. Surgical treatment usually involves decompression surgery and fusion techniques; however, standard fusion surgery in elderly patients is associated with a higher rate of complications, hospital length of stay, and readmission. Although minimally invasive surgery can reduce risk and shorten hospital stays, it still cannot eliminate the inherent complications of fusion or internal fixation, especially in frail patients. Therefore, it is necessary to find a surgical technology that can not only reduce the risk of operation but also effectively reduce the inherent complications of fusion or internal fixation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of percutaneous cement discoplasty for the treatment of LDDs. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The search strategy was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine Disc, and Medical Knowledge Network Citation Database. The quality of the included study was assessed by the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) score. The risk of bias (RoB) about the included study was assessed by the Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. The main results were summarized and analyzed in RevMan 5.4. RESULTS: Finally, we included 10 articles and collected a total of 359 patients, including 171 males (47.63%) and 180 females (52.37%), with an average age of 73.09 ±â€…2.74 years. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool was used to assess the articles included in this study, the methodological quality score of 10 retrospective studies varied from 7 to 11. The RoB was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Critical RoB was found in 4/10 articles, high RoB was found in 5/10 articles, and intermediate RoB was found in 1/10 articles. The study found that the Visual Analog Scale scores at 1 day (mean difference [MD]: 3.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.04, 3.93; I2 = 0%), 3 to 6 months (MD: 4.05; 95% CI: 3.53, 4.56; I2 = 65%), and 12 to 24 months (MD: 4.00; 95% CI: 3.53, 4.47; I2 = 45%) after operation were significantly different from those before operation. Meanwhile, the Oswestry Disability Index at 1 day (MD: 42.67; 95% CI: 36.78, 48.57; I2 = 76%), 3 to 6 months (MD: 42.64; 95% CI: 34.44, 50.83; I2 = 91%), and 12 to 24 months (MD: 49.22; 95% CI: 42.23, 56.22; I2 = 83 %) after operation were still significantly different from those before operation. The results with high heterogeneity (I2>50%) were analyzed by sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis. The results still have significant statistical differences. CONCLUSION: Studies have shown that percutaneous cement discoplasty is a potential intervention for the treatment of LDDs, which can effectively relieve pain and improve dysfunction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The study aims to explore the management of two-level cervical disc disease and to compare outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), and hybrid surgery (HS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 2011 and December 2021, a total of 120 patients (76 males, 44 females; mean age: 44.8±8.1 years; range, 18 to 68 years) who were diagnosed as two-level cervical disc disease and underwent anterior cervical surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were randomly divided into three groups as ACDF, CDA, and HS each consisting of 40 patients. The Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), clinical and radiological findings, and range of motion (ROM) data were evaluated. RESULTS: All of the groups showed a significant improvement according to clinical and radiological outcomes (p=0.01). The mean follow-up was 27.5±6.1 months for ACDF, 20.0±4.7 months for CDA, and 21.1±5.0 months for HS, showing consistency in monitoring post-surgery outcomes. The mean postoperative NDI scores were 13.4±5.6, 14.8±5.2 and 15.0±5.5 in the ACDF, CDA and HS groups, respectively (p=0.056). The mean postoperative ROM values were 20.82±5.66, 32.45±11.21 and 27.18±10.89, respectively (p=0.045). CONCLUSION: All three surgical techniques, ACDF, CDA, and HS, are safe and successful in the treatment of two-level cervical disc disease. However, HS and CDA may be more preferable over ACDF attributed to their motion-preserving benefits and effectively combining fusion and motion preservation techniques, with comparable clinical and radiological outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Pfirrmann scoring system classifies lumbosacral disc degeneration based on magnetic resonance imaging signal intensity. The relationship between pre-existing disc degeneration and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after one-level lumbar fusion is not well documented. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the severity of preoperative intervertebral disc degeneration and preoperative and postoperative PROMs in patients undergoing one-level lumbar fusion. METHODS: All adult patients who underwent posterior lumbar decompression and fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between 2014 and 2022 were included. Patient demographics and comorbidities were extracted from medical records. Lumbar intervertebral discs on sagittal magnetic resonance imaging T2-weighted images were assessed by 2 independent graders utilizing Pfirrmann criteria. Grades I-III were categorized as low-grade disc degeneration, while IV-V were considered high grade. Multivariable linear regression assessed the impact of disc degeneration on PROMs. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included, of which 69 (46%) had low-grade disc degeneration, while 81 (54%) had high-grade degeneration. Patients with high-grade degeneration had increased preoperative visual analog scale (VAS)-Leg scores (6.10 vs. 4.54, P = 0.005) and displayed greater 1-year postoperative improvements in VAS-Back scores (-2.11 vs. -0.66, P = 0.002). Multivariable regression demonstrated Pfirrmann scores as independent predictors for both preoperative VAS-Leg scores (P = 0.004) and postoperative VAS-Back improvement (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing one-level lumbar fusion, higher Pfirmann scores were associated with increased preoperative leg pain and greater 1-year postoperative improvement in back pain. Further studies into the relationship of preoperative disc degeneration and their impact on postoperative outcomes may help guide clinical decision-making and patient expectations.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This study compared the 1-year clinical outcomes and disc degeneration rates after transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TF-FED), condoliase injection, open discectomy (OD), and microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). In total, 279 patients with LDH were divided into four treatment groups: TF-FED, OD, MED, and condoliase injection. Outcomes were evaluated on the basis of the complication rate, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and the modified MacNab criteria. Surgical and hospital costs were assessed. Disc degeneration and endplate bone marrow edema were evaluated using magnetic resonance images. The mean postoperative JOABPEQ, VAS, or modified MacNab scores among the four groups had no significant differences. Additionally, the nerve injury or reoperation rate among the TF-FED, OD, and MED groups had no significant difference. However, the reoperation rate with condoliase injection was high because of residual disc herniation. Surgical and hospital costs were lower with condoliase injection and higher with OD and MED than those with TF-FED. With TF-FED and condoliase injection, the Pfirrmann grade progressed, and the disc height was significantly smaller than that with OD and MED. Endplate bone marrow edema was more common with condoliase injection and TF-FED. All groups had good outcomes. TF-FED and condoliase injection may reduce the burden of surgery because they can be performed under local anesthesia with little blood loss and low medical costs but tend to be associated with disc degeneration and endplate bone marrow edema. A randomized controlled study with a larger sample is needed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Assessment of bone formation in an ovine interbody fusion study. OBJECTIVE: To compare OsteoAdapt SP, which consists of AMP-2, a modified variant of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) bound to a tricalcium phosphate-containing carrier, to autologous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) in a lumbar interbody fusion model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Treatment of lumbar disk degeneration often involves spinal fusion to reduce pain and motion at the affected spinal segment by insertion of a cage containing bone graft material. Three graft materials were compared in this study-ICBG and OsteoAdapt SP (low or high dose). METHODS: The sheep underwent lateral lumbar fusion surgery with PEEK or Titanium interbody cages packed with OsteoAdapt SP (low or high dose) or ICBG. Outcomes were evaluated at 8-, 16- and 26- weeks. Newly formed bone quality, bone mineralization, and fusion were assessed by manual palpation, qualitative and semi-quantitative histopathology, histomorphometry, computed tomography (CT), and micro-CT (mCT) analysis. RESULTS: OsteoAdapt SP was implanted into 43 animals and ICBG into 21 animals (L3-L4). No group showed evidence of systemic toxicity by multiple assessments. All levels were fused by manual palpation at 26 weeks. Serial CT scans showed increasing fusion scores over time. Both doses of OsteoAdapt SP resulted in robust new bone formation and progression of fusion in the interbody cage. Range of motion tests for treatment groups was lower compared with ICBG at 8- and 16 weeks. Similarly, histology at eight weeks demonstrated more robust new bone formation for both OsteoAdapt SP groups compared to autograft. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated the preclinical safety and efficacy of OsteoAdapt SP in a clinically relevant large animal model, supporting faster and more robust new bone formation within the interbody cage, comparable to or better than the gold standard, ICBG, in all measures.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As an emerging technology in robot-assisted (RA) surgery, the potential benefits of its application in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) lack substantial support from current evidence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether the RA TLIF is superior to FG TLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies comparing RA versus FG TLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases through July 2022 by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL (EBSCO), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, VIP, and the Cochrane Library, as well as the references of published review articles. Both cohort studies (CSs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Evaluation criteria included the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw placement, proximal facet joint violation (FJV), radiation exposure, duration of surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical revision. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias and ROBINS-I Tool. Random-effects models were used, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) was employed as the effect measure. We conducted subgroup analyses based on surgical type, the specific robot system used, and the study design. Two investigators independently screened abstracts and full-text articles, and the certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. RESULTS: Our search identified 539 articles, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis revealed that RA had 1.03-folds higher "clinically acceptable" accuracy than FG (RR: 1.0382, 95% CI: 1.0273-1.0493). And RA had 1.12-folds higher "perfect" accuracy than FG group (RR: 1.1167, 95% CI: 1.0726-1.1626). In the case of proximal FJV, our results indicate a 74% reduction in occurrences for patients undergoing RA pedicle screw placement compared to those in the FG group (RR: 0.2606, 95%CI: 0.2063- 0.3293). Seventeen CSs and two RCTs reported the duration of time. The results of CSs suggest that there is no significant difference between RA and FG group (SMD: 0.1111, 95%CI: -0.391-0.6131), but the results of RCTs suggest that the patients who underwent RA-TLIF need more surgery time than FG (SMD: 3.7213, 95%CI: 3.0756-4.3669). Sixteen CSs and two RCTs reported the EBL. The results suggest that the patients who underwent RA pedicle screw placement had fewer EBL than FG group (CSs: SMD: -1.9151, 95%CI: -3.1265-0.7036, RCTs: SMD: -5.9010, 95%CI: -8.7238-3.0782). For radiation exposure, the results of CSs suggest that there is no significant difference in radiation time between RA and FG group (SMD: -0.5256, 95%CI: -1.4357-0.3845), but the patients who underwent RA pedicle screw placement had fewer radiation dose than FG group (SMD: -2.2682, 95%CI: -3.1953-1.3411). And four CSs and one RCT reported the number of revision case. The results of CSs suggest that there is no significant difference in the number of revision case between RA and FG group (RR: 0.4087,95% CI 0.1592-1.0495). Our findings are limited by the residual heterogeneity of the included studies, which may limit the interpretation of the results. CONCLUSION: In TLIF, RA technology exhibits enhanced precision in pedicle screw placement when compared to FG methods. This accuracy contributes to advantages such as the protection of adjacent facet joints and reductions in intraoperative radiation dosage and blood loss. However, the longer preoperative preparation time associated with RA procedures results in comparable surgical duration and radiation time to FG techniques. Presently, FG screw placement remains the predominant approach, with clinical surgeons possessing greater proficiency in its application. Consequently, the integration of RA into TLIF surgery may not be considered the optimal choice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023441600.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of injectable cemented hollow pedicle screw (CICPS) in the treatment of osteoporotic lumbar degenerative diseases through a large sample long-term follow-up study. Additionally, we aim to explore the risk factors affecting interbody fusion. METHODS: A total of 98 patients who underwent CICPS for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for osteoporotic lumbar degenerative disease from March 2011 to September 2017 were analyzed. X-ray and electronic computed tomography (CT) imaging data were collected during preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up periods. The data included changes in intervertebral space height (ΔH), screw failure, cement leakage (CL), and intervertebral fusion. The patients were divided into two groups based on their fusion status one year after surgery: satisfied group A and dissatisfied group B. Surgical data such as operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume and surgical complications were recorded, and visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the improvement of lumbar and leg pain. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 101.29 months (ranging from 70 to 128 months). A total of 320 CICPS were used, with 26 screws (8.13%) leaking, 3 screws (0.94%) experiencing cement augmentation failure, and 1 screw (0.31%) becoming loose and breaking. The remaining screws were not loose or pulled out. Female gender, decreased bone density, and CL were identified as risk factors affecting interbody fusion (P < 0.05). Early realization of interbody fusion can effectively prevent the loss of intervertebral space height (P < 0.05) and maintain the surgical treatment effect. Both VAS and ODI scores showed significant improvement during the follow-up period (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that decreased bone density and cement leakage were risk factors for prolonged interbody fusion. CONCLUSIONS: The results of long-term follow-up indicate that PMMA enhanced CICPS has unique advantages in achieving good clinical efficacy in the treatment of osteoporosis lumbar degenerative diseases. Attention should be paid to identify female gender, severe osteoporosis, and CL as risk factors affecting interbody fusion.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Artificial lumbar disc replacement is an effective method for the treatment of lumbosacral degenerative diseases. An appropriate artificial intervertebral disc device is of great significance for the maintenance of spinal stability and activity. METHODS: Two finite element models of ProDisc-L prosthesis replacement and improved prosthesis replacement were constructed by using the finite element model of complete lumbar L1-L5 segment established by CT image data. The mechanical properties of the surgical models before and after improvement were analyzed and evaluated. RESULTS: The ProDisc-L group and the improved group showed similar lumbar's ROM and maintained a similar ROM with the normal lumbar spine. There was no significant change in the intervertebral disc's pressure between the adjacent segments of the two prosthesis groups compared with the normal group, but the stress value of the improved prosthesis group was slightly lower than that of the ProDisc-L group. In addition, the improved prosthesis replacement has more reasonable stress distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the ProDisc-L prosthesis, the improved prosthesis can reduce the pressure in the intervertebral disc of the adjacent segment, the contact stress of the facet joint and the artificial prosthesis, which provides reference for the subsequent design of the prosthesis structure.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study examined clinical outcomes associated with 3 types of noncontiguous cervical surgeries - anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), and hybrid cervical surgery (HCS) - to improve surgeon decision-making. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from database inception until June 6th, 2023. Inclusion criteria were studies that reported any type of clinical outcome, examined noncontiguous ACDF, noncontiguous CDA, and/or noncontiguous HCS. RESULTS: Ten articles out of 523 articles initially retrieved were included. Patients (n = 388) had a mean age of 52 ± 5.1 years and a mean follow up time of 33 ± 6.0 months. Overall, 119 patients underwent non-contiguous HCS, 65 underwent non-contiguous CDA, and 204 underwent non-contiguous ACDF. There appears to be no clinically meaningful difference in Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and improvement in pain based on surgery type. There was a total of 83 complications (21% of cases) with non-contiguous ACDF having a higher absolute rate of dysphagia (20%) as compared to non-contiguous HCS (6.7%) or non-contiguous CDA (6.2%). Non-contiguous ACDF had a higher absolute rate of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) as a reported complication (6.4%) as compared to non-contiguous HCS (1.7%) and non-contiguous CDA (0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: There may be no clinically meaningful difference in many clinical outcomes for different non-contiguous surgical interventions for non-contiguous cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). However, complication rates, such as dysphagia and ASD, appear higher for non-contiguous ACDF as compared to non-contiguous CDA or HCS.

Asunto(s)