RESUMEN
Adverse reaction reporting is essential to understand the actual safety of marketed medicines. There are cases of patients with multidrug intolerance syndrome, an under-reported entity, which can occur when adverse reactions to more than two pharmacologically unrelated drugs occur in the same patient. We describe the case of a woman diagnosed with multisensitive Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis who experienced adverse reactions to five structurally unrelated antibiotics with different mechanisms of action in two consecutive hospitalisations. The reactions were secondary to cefazolin (tricytopenia), vancomycin (renal injury), daptomycin (elevated creatine phosphokinase) and linezolid (hepatotoxicity) in the first hospitalization, and to cotrimoxazole (thrombocytopenia) in the second. Transient damage to different organ systems was observed in all cases. Finally, hospital discharge was granted with clindamycin without further intercurrences until treatment was completed. This case could correspond to the aforementioned syndrome or to an as yet uncharacterized entity.
La información sobre reacciones adversas es fundamental para conocer la seguridad real de los medicamentos comercializados. Existen casos de pacientes con síndrome de intolerancia a múltiples drogas, una entidad poco reportada, la que puede presentarse cuando en un mismo paciente ocurren reacciones adversas a más de dos medicamentos no relacionados farmacológicamente. Se describe el caso de una mujer con diagnóstico de endocarditis por Staphylococcus aureus multisensible, que cursó con reacciones adversas a cinco antibióticos estructuralmente no relacionados y con mecanismos de acción diferentes, en dos internaciones consecutivas. Las reacciones fueron secundarias a cefazolina (tricitopenia), vancomicina (injuria renal), daptomicina (elevación de creatina fosfoquinasa) y linezolid (hepatotoxicidad) en la primera internación, y a cotrimoxazol (plaquetopenia) en la segunda. En todos los casos se observó daño transitorio en diferentes sistemas de órganos. Finalmente, se otorgó alta hospitalaria con clindamicina sin nuevas intercurrencias hasta finalizar tratamiento. Este caso podría corresponder al síndrome antes mencionado o a una entidad aún no caracterizada.
Asunto(s)
Daptomicina , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Femenino , Humanos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Vancomicina/efectos adversos , Linezolid/efectos adversos , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Besides being an essential part of the skin microbiome, coagulase-negative staphylococci are the etiological factors of serious infections. The aim of the study was to evaluate the heteroresistance to vancomycin and the potential antimicrobial efficacy of teicoplanin and daptomycin against the multiresistant strains of S. haemolyticus, S. hominis, S. warneri, and S. simulans. The study covered 80 clinical coagulase-negative staphylococci. Teicoplanin, vancomycin, and daptomycin MICs for the tested strains were determined according to EUCAST recommendation. The vanA and vanB genes were searched. The brain heart infusion screen agar method detected vancomycin heteroresistance. The population analysis profile method and analysis of autolytic activity were applied for the strains growing on BHI containing 4 mg/L vancomycin. Seven S. haemolyticus, two S. hominis, and two S. warneri strains presented a heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin. Their subpopulations were able to grow on a medium containing 4-12 mg/L of vancomycin. Monitoring heteroresistance to peptide antibiotics, which are often the last resort in staphylococcal infections, is essential due to the severe crisis in antibiotic therapy and the lack of alternatives to treat infections with multiresistant strains. Our work highlights the selection of resistant strains and the need for more careful use of peptide antibiotics.
Asunto(s)
Daptomicina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Vancomicina , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Coagulasa , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus , Pruebas de Sensibilidad MicrobianaRESUMEN
We present the case of a pregnant woman with community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia who required combined treatment with daptomycin and cefazolin for control after failure of an initial treatment with vancomycin. She had a favorable evolution, and the study of family contacts revealed a phenotypic and genetically similar isolate in a nasal sample from his mother. The carriage study on three household cats was negative. This case reveals that bacteremia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus can affect pregnant women, and that the use of combined therapies may be necessary for its control. Sometimes, family contacts can carry this agent, and an eradication treatment is suggested..
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Cefazolina , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Daptomicina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Cefazolina/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/microbiología , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMEN
La aparición de cepas de enterococos resistentes a daptomicina es un tema de preocupación clínica y epidemiológica en años recientes. Se presenta el caso de un paciente de 50 años con antecedente de artritis reumatoide e inmunosupresión crónica hospitalizado en contexto de neumonía viral por COVID-19, con sobreinfección bacteriana y choque séptico, en quien se documentó en tres oportunidades diferentes aislamientos de Enterococcus faecium vancomicino-resistente VAN A y B con falla terapéutica a daptomicina, por deterioro clínico y persistencia de hemocultivos positivos. Se inició manejo con linezolid con control de la infección, negativización de hemocultivos y evolución clínica satisfactoria. Se realiza reporte del presente caso para dar a conocer la aparición de enterococos resistentes a daptomicina, la cual es una creciente preocupación epidemiológica, con el fin de realizar identificación temprana, prevenir falla terapéutica y poder conocer la epidemiología local
n recent years, the emergence of daptomycin-resistant enterococcus strains is a growing clinical and epidemio-logical topic of concern. We report the case of a 50 year old patient with an antecedent of rheumatoid arthritis and chronic immunosuppression hospitalized in the con-text of COVID-19 pneumonia with bacterial co-infection and septic shock in which a three different moments an isolate of a "vancomycin-resistant enterococcus faecium"(VRE) Van A and B that presented therapeutic failure with daptomycin was documented after clinical deterioration and persistence of positive blood cultures. Linezolid was initiated, with clinical recovery and negativization of blood cultures following the change in antibiotic treatment. This case is reported in order to expose the ever growing con-cern of daptomycin-resistant enterococcus strains in or-der to prevent therapeutic failure, make early identifica-tion and get to know the local epidemiological status.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enterococcus faecium , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia BacterianaRESUMEN
Infections caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) are still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment failures of cefazolin (CFZ) have been reported and probably related to the inoculum effect. New treatments for severe MSSA infections are needed and ceftaroline fosamil (CPT) could be an option. Our aim was to describe the clinical characteristics of five patients with complicated MSSA bacteremia failing CFZ and successfully treated with CPT. We performed a retrospective chart review in a Hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina; in a 12-month period, five patients (24%) of 21 with MSSA bacteremia experienced CFZ failure and were salvaged with CPT. The median time of CFZ therapy was 10 days before changing to CPT; four patients had evidence of metastatic spread and 2 had endocarditis. All patients experienced microbiological and clinical cure with CPT, which was used as monotherapy in 4 and in combination with daptomycin in another. One patient discontinued CPT due to neutropenia on day 23 of treatment. In patients with MSSA BSI failing current therapy, CPT could be a good therapeutic option.
Las infecciones causadas por Staphylococcus aureus sensible a la meticilina (SASM) todavía se asocian con una morbilidad y mortalidad significativas. Se han informado fallas en el tratamiento de cefazolina (CFZ) probablemente relacionadas con efecto inóculo. Nuevos tratamientos son necesarios para estas infecciones y ceftarolina fosamil (CPT) podría ser una opción. Nuestro objetivo fue describir las características clínicas de cinco pacientes con bacteriemia por SASM complicada con falla a CFZ y que fueron exitosamente tratados con CPT. Realizamos una revisión retrospectiva de historias clínicas en un hospital de Buenos Aires, Argentina; en un período de 12 meses, cinco pacientes (24%) de 21 con bacteriemia por SASM experimentaron falla a CFZ y fueron tratados con CPT. La mediana de tiempo de la terapia con CFZ fue de 10 días antes de cambiar a CPT; cuatro pacientes presentaban evidencia de diseminación metastásica y 2 tenían endocarditis. Todos los pacientes experimentaron curación microbiológica y clínica con CPT, que se utilizó como monoterapia en 4 y en combinación con daptomicina en otro. Un paciente interrumpió CPT debido a neutropenia el día 23 de tratamiento. En enfermos con infecciones graves por SASM que fallan en la terapia actual, CPT podría ser una buena opción terapéutica.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Daptomicina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Cefazolina/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Meticilina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia Recuperativa , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/complicaciones , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus , CeftarolinaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of daptomycin against methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRSA and MRSE) bacteremia using computer modeling. METHODS: A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling strategy to explain the data from an in vitro dynamic model employing time-kill curves for MRSA and MRSE was proposed. Bacterial killing was followed over time by determining viable counts and the resulting time-kill data was analyzed. Monte Carlo simulations were performed using pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic data to determine the probabilities of target attainment and cumulative fractions of response in terms of area under the concentration curve/minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) targets of daptomycin. Simulations were conducted to assess the reduction in the number of colony-forming units (CFU)/mL for 18 days of treatment with daptomycin at doses of 6, 8, and 10 mg/kg/24 h or 48 h with variations in creatinine clearance (CLCR): 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2, 30-49 mL/min/1.73 m2, 50-100 mL/min/1.73 m2, as well as for defining the probability of reaching the target fAUC/MIC = 80 in the same dose and clearance range. A PK/PD model with saturation in the number of bacteria in vitro, growth delay, and bacterial death, as well as Hill's factor, was used to describe the data for both MRSA and MRSE. RESULTS: Monte Carlo simulations showed that for MRSA there was a reduction > 2 log CFU/mL with doses ≥ 6 mg/kg/day in 75th percentile of the simulated population after 18 days of treatment with daptomycin, whereas for MRSE this reduction was observed in 95th percentile of the population. CONCLUSIONS: The presented in vitro PK/PD model and associated modeling approach were able to characterize the time-kill kinetics of MRSA and MRSE. Our study based on PTAs suggests that doses ≥ 6 mg/kg/day of daptomycin should be used to treat bacteremia caused by MRSA and MRSE in patients with CLCR of 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2. For patients with CLCR ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2, it would be necessary to employ a dose of 10 mg/kg/day to treat complicated bacteremias.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Daptomicina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Método de Montecarlo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Daptomicina/farmacocinética , Daptomicina/farmacología , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Use of daptomycin at doses ≥ 6 mg/kg for treatment of osteomyelitis is increasing in clinical practice; unfortunately, limited data are available to guide optimal dosing and duration. The objective of this study was to assess daptomycin dosing and duration regimens for osteomyelitis treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multi-site, cohort study conducted in an integrated healthcare delivery system. Nonpregnant patients ≥ 18 years of age with osteomyelitis diagnosed between November 1, 2003 and June 30, 2011, ≥ 2 weeks outpatient daptomycin therapy, and ≥ 1 month of follow-up were included. Daptomycin doses < 6 mg/kg and ≥ 6 mg/kg at durations of < 6 weeks and ≥ 6 weeks were examined with univariate and multivariate analyses to assess treatment success and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients were included, with 39 (15.8%), 37 (15.0%), 107 (43.3%), and 64 (25.9%) receiving < 6 mg/kg and ≥ 6 weeks, < 6 mg/kg and < 6 weeks, ≥ 6 mg/kg and ≥ 6 weeks, and ≥ 6 mg/kg and < 6 weeks of daptomycin therapy, respectively. Patients had a mean age of 58 years and had received prior vancomycin therapy (65.6%). Patients receiving < 6 weeks of therapy were less likely to experience treatment success compared with ≥ 6 weeks (41.5% vs 25.3%, adjusted odds ratio = 0.55; 95% confidence interval = 0.31-0.98) independent of duration. There were no differences across groups in mortality after adjustment. CONCLUSION: In a diverse clinical population, daptomycin for treatment of osteomyelitis of 6 weeks or longer duration was associated with success independent of dose. This finding supports longer treatment with daptomycin as a first-line agent in antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.
Asunto(s)
Daptomicina , Osteomielitis , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Daptomicina/efectos adversos , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteomielitis/inducido químicamente , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vancomycin has been considered the treatment of choice especially for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections; but its poor tissue penetration, renal toxicity, and requiring of dosages monitoring, raises the need for new treatment alternatives such as daptomycin. AIMS: To analyze the safety and effectiveness of daptomycin in children. METHODS: Children with microbiologically documented infections treated with daptomycin were retrospectively included. RESULTS: The most frequent infections were endocarditis in 9 (32%), sepsis in 4 (14%), bacteremia in 7 (associated with catheter in 3) (25%), osteomyelitis in 3 (10%), peritonitis associated with dialysis in 3 (10%) and suppurative thrombophlebitis in 2 patients (p) (7%). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen in 18 patients (64%). The indications for daptomycin were due to the failure of conventional treatment in 17 (61%), and the toxicity or intolerance to vancomycin in 11 patients (39%). The average duration of treatment was 19 days (95% ICR 7-42 days). Four patients (14%) completed outpatient treatment, 22 patients had a favorable response (79%). Adverse events were reported in 3 patients (2 creatinine-phosfo-kinase increase) and in one severe skin rash. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety in this pediatric population.
Asunto(s)
Daptomicina , Hospitales Pediátricos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Resumen Introducción: Vancomicina ha sido considerada como el tratamiento de elección en especial para Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina (SARM); pero su escasa penetración tisular, su toxicidad renal y el requerir monitoreo de su dosis, plantean la necesidad de nuevas alternativas de tratamiento, como daptomicina. Objetivos: Analizar la seguridad y efectividad de daptomicina en niños. Pacientes y Métodos: Se incluyeron, retrospectivamente, niños con infecciones microbiológicamente documentadas, tratados con daptomicina. Resultados: Las infecciones más frecuentes fueron endocarditis en 9 (32%), sepsis de la comunidad en 4 (14%), bacteriemia en 7 (asociada a catéter en 3) (25%), osteomielitis en 3 (10%), peritonitis asociada a diálisis en 3 (10%) y tromboflebitis supurativa en 2 pacientes (7%). Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina fue el patógeno más común en 18 pacientes (64%), Daptomicina fue indicada por el fracaso del tratamiento convencional en 17 (61%), y la toxicidad o intolerancia a vancomicina en 11 pacientes (39%). La duración media de tratamiento fue de 19 días (RIC 95% 7-42 días). Cuatro pacientes (14%) completaron tratamiento ambulatorio. Tuvieron respuesta favorable 22 pacientes (79%) Se reportaron eventos adversos en tres pacientes: dos elevaciones de creatina-fosfocinasa) y una erupción cutánea grave. Conclusiones: Daptomicina demostró una eficacia y seguridad favorables en esta población pediátrica.
Abstract Background: Vancomycin has been considered the treatment of choice especially for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections; but its poor tissue penetration, renal toxicity, and requiring of dosages monitoring, raises the need for new treatment alternatives such as daptomycin. Aims: To analyze the safety and effectiveness of daptomycin in children. Methods: Children with microbiologically documented infections treated with daptomycin were retrospectively included. Results: The most frequent infections were endocarditis in 9 (32%), sepsis in 4 (14%), bacteremia in 7 (associated with catheter in 3) (25%), osteomyelitis in 3 (10%), peritonitis associated with dialysis in 3 (10%) and suppurative thrombophlebitis in 2 patients (p) (7%). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen in 18 patients (64%). The indications for daptomycin were due to the failure of conventional treatment in 17 (61%), and the toxicity or intolerance to vancomycin in 11 patients (39%). The average duration of treatment was 19 days (95% ICR 7-42 days). Four patients (14%) completed outpatient treatment, 22 patients had a favorable response (79%). Adverse events were reported in 3 patients (2 creatinine-phosfo-kinase increase) and in one severe skin rash. Conclusions: Daptomycin demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety in this pediatric population.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Niño , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antibacterianos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Resumo Objetivo: A blefarite é uma das condições mais comumente encontradas na prática oftalmológica e se constitui em uma causa frequente de irritação e desconforto ocular. Por ser uma doença de difícil tratamento, os autores buscaram compreender melhor a epidemiologia, etiologia, apresentações clínicas, tratamento e evolução de seus pacientes, visando maior sucesso terapêutico. Métodos: Foram avaliados retrospectivamente e transversalmente o prontuário de 124 pacientes do Centro de Oftalmologia Tadeu Cvintal, os quais apresentavam blefarite e foram submetidos à classificação de gravidade e coleta de secreções palpebrais para cultura bacteriana e antibiograma. Resultados: A media da idade dos pacientes foi de 67,4 anos, o sexo feminino foi responsável por 70 (56,4%) casos e o masculino por 54 (43,5%). Quanto à gravidade da doença, constatou-se 71 casos de blefarite leve (56,8%), 52 (41,6%) com intensidade moderada e 2 (1,6%) casos graves. Avaliando o seguimento do tratamento da doença, foi observado que 103 (82,4%) pacientes não retornaram para avaliar o resultado do tratamento e apenas 22 (17,6%) retornaram. Em relação às culturas realizadas, 82 (66,1%) não apresentaram crescimento microbiano. Dentre as 42 (33,8%) amostras positivas, os Staphylococcus coagulase negativo foram os mais prevalentes, sobretudo os Staphylococcus epidermidis, responsável por 35 (83,3%) delas. Quanto à sensibilidade aos antibióticos, os agentes de nossa amostra demonstraram maior resistência à Penicilina, Eritromicina e Ciprofloxacino e 100% de sensibilidade à Linezolida, Vancomicina e Daptomicina. Conclusão: Conhecendo melhor as características epidemiológicas da blefarite e a sensibilidade antimicrobiana das bactérias envolvidas, é possível oferecer tratamentos mais eficazes.
Abstract Objective: Blepharitis is one of the most commonly encountered conditions in ophthalmic practice and is a frequent cause of eye irritation and discomfort. Being a difficult to treat disease, the authors sought to better understand the epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentations, treatment and evolution of their patients, aiming at greater therapeutic success. Methods: The medical records of 124 patients of Centro de Oftalmologia Tadeu Cvintal who had blepharitis were retrospectively and cross-sectionally evaluated and underwent severity classification and collection of eyelid secretions for bacterial culture and antibiogram. Results: The mean age of the patients was 67.4 years, females accounted for 70 (56.4%) cases and males for 54 (43.5%). Regarding the severity of the disease, there were 71 cases of mild blepharitis (56.8%), 52 (41.6%) with moderate intensity and 2 (1.6%) severe cases. Evaluating the follow-up of treatment of the disease, it was observed that 103 (82.4%) patients did not return to evaluate the treatment outcome and only 22 (17.6%) returned. In respect of the cultures performed, 82 (66.1%) did not show microbial growth. Among the 42 (33.8%) positive samples, coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most prevalent, especially Staphylococcus epidermidis, responsible for 35 (83.3%) of them. As for antibiotic sensitivity, the agents in our sample showed greater resistance to Penicillin, Erythromycin and Ciprofloxacin and 100% sensitivity to Linezolid, Vancomycin and Daptomycin. Conclusion: By better understanding the epidemiological characteristics of blepharitis and the antimicrobial sensitivity of the bacteria involved, it is possible to offer more effective treatments.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Blefaritis/etiología , Blefaritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Blefaritis/epidemiología , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Registros Médicos , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Técnicas de CultivoRESUMEN
BACKGROUD: Daptomycin has been used in bone and joint infections (BJI) and prosthesis joint infections (PJI) considering spectrum of activity and biofilm penetration. However, the current experience is based on case reports, case series, cohorts, and international surveys. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate studies about daptomycin treatment efficacy in BJI/PJI compared to other antibiotic regimens. METHODS: PubMed, LILACS, Scielo and Web of Science databases were searched for articles about daptomycin and treatment of BJI and PJI from inception to March 2018. Inclusion criteria were any published researches that included patients with BJI treated with daptomycin. Diagnosis of BJI was based on clinical, laboratory and radiological findings according to IDSA guidelines. RESULTS: From 5107 articles, 12 articles were included. Only three studies described the outcomes of patients with BJI treated with daptomycin with comparator regimen (vancomycin, teicoplanin and oxacillin). Studies presented large heterogeneity regarding device related infections, surgical procedures, and daptomycin regimens (varied from 4â¯mg/kg to 10â¯mg/kg). A total of 299 patients have been included in all studies (184 infections associated with orthopedic disposal and 115 osteomyelitis/septic arthritis). Two hundred and thirty-three patients were treated with daptomycin. The clinical cure rates on device related and non-device related infections (i.e. osteomyelitis) were 70% and 78%, respectively. Compared to all regimens evaluated, daptomycin group outcomes were non-inferior. CONCLUSION: Although a randomized clinical trial is needed, this systematic review tends to support daptomycin usage for bone and joint infections.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Artropatías/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Infecciosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Prótesis Articulares/efectos adversos , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Backgroud: Daptomycin has been used in bone and joint infections (BJI) and prosthesis joint infections (PJI) considering spectrum of activity and biofilm penetration. However, the current experience is based on case reports, case series, cohorts, and international surveys. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate studies about daptomycin treatment efficacy in BJI/PJI compared to other antibiotic regimens. Methods: PubMed, LILACS, Scielo and Web of Science databases were searched for articles about daptomycin and treatment of BJI and PJI from inception to March 2018. Inclusion criteria were any published researches that included patients with BJI treated with daptomycin. Diagnosis of BJI was based on clinical, laboratory and radiological findings according to IDSA guidelines. Results: From 5107 articles, 12 articles were included. Only three studies described the outcomes of patients with BJI treated with daptomycin with comparator regimen (vancomycin, teicoplanin and oxacillin). Studies presented large heterogeneity regarding device related infections, surgical procedures, and daptomycin regimens (varied from 4 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg). A total of 299 patients have been included in all studies (184 infections associated with orthopedic disposal and 115 osteomyelitis/septic arthritis). Two hundred and thirty-three patients were treated with daptomycin. The clinical cure rates on device related and non-device related infections (i.e. osteomyelitis) were 70% and 78%, respectively. Compared to all regimens evaluated, daptomycin group outcomes were non-inferior. Conclusion: Although a randomized clinical trial is needed, this systematic review tends to support daptomycin usage for bone and joint infections.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Enfermedades Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Artropatías/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Infecciosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Prótesis Articulares/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Daptomicina/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Colombia , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Multiple-drug-resistant enterococcal infections canbe a serious problem in pediatric patients particularly concomitance with severe underlying diseases and lead to significant morbidity and mortality. The treatment options in children are limited compared with adults. We report a 3-year old-boy with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-M7 and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia successfully treated with daptomycin. Daptomycin may be an alternative therapy for VRE infections in children; more studies are needed for extended usage.
Las infecciones enterocócicas multirresistentes pueden ser un problema serio en los pacientes pediátricos y causarles complicaciones importantes o la muerte, en particular, en los casos de enfermedades subyacentes graves concomitantes. Las opciones de tratamiento en los niños son limitadas en comparación con las de los adultos. En este artículo, presentamos el caso de un niño de 3 años con leucemia mieloide aguda (LMA)-M7 y bacteriemia por Enterococcus resistente a la vancomicina, que se trató satisfactoriamente con daptomicina. La daptomicina puede ser un tratamiento alternativo para las infecciones por Enterococcus resistente a la vancomicina (ERV) en los niños. Se necesitan más estudios para ampliar su uso.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicaciones , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina , Preescolar , Humanos , Masculino , Inducción de RemisiónRESUMEN
Treatment of severe infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is challenging due to the scarcity of reliable therapeutic alternatives. In this context, daptomycin (DAP), a lipopeptide antibiotic, has emerged as an interesting alternative as it is one of the few compounds that retain in vitro bactericidal activity against VRE isolates, although it has not been approved for this purpose by regulatory agencies. In this review, we will summarise the clinical, animal and in vitro evidence evaluating the efficacy of DAP for the management of deep-seated VRE infections. In addition, we will address important clinical concerns such as the emergence of DAP resistance during therapy and reports of therapeutic failure with DAP monotherapy. Finally, we will discuss possible future strategies (such as the use of higher doses and/or combination therapies) to optimise the use of this antibiotic against VRE.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enterococos Resistentes a la Vancomicina/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Las infecciones por Staphylococcus aureus meticilino resistente adquirido en la comunidad (SAMR-AC) constituyen un problema emergente debido a su elevada virulencia y gran capacidad de diseminación. Para las infecciones invasivas, las recomendaciones publicadas sugieren vancomicina como droga de elección. Sin embargo, no está claro si otras alternativas pudieran ser mejores en determinadas situaciones, o si el uso de combinaciones de antibióticos sería beneficioso. No se han realizado trabajos que sugieran que alguna alternativa terapéutica sea preferible a otra para el tratamiento de pacientes con infecciones invasivas por SAMR-AC, por lo que las decisiones a tomar se basan en la extrapolación de datos de estudios realizados en otros contextos o en la opinión de expertos. Por tal motivo, se presenta esta revisión, con el objeto de poner en manos de los infectólogos y otros especialistas la evidencia disponible, a fin de intentar encontrar las mejores alternativas de tratamiento para estas infecciones...
Infections caused to community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) is an emerging problem due to its high virulence and large capacity of spread. For invasive infections, published recommendations suggest vancomycin as the drug of choice. However, it is unclear whether other alternatives might be better in certain situations, or if the use of combinations of antibiotics would be beneficial. No studies has been done to suggest that any therapeutic alternative is better than another for the treatment of patients with invasive CA-MRSA infections, so the decisions you make are based on extrapolation of data from studies in other contexts or expert opinion. Therefore, this review is presented, in order to put in the hands of infectologist and others specialists the available evidence, in order to find the best treatmente options for these infections...
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Clindamicina/farmacología , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Encuestas de Morbilidad , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/patogenicidad , Vancomicina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
High-dose daptomycin (DAP) therapy failed in a neutropenic patient with bloodstream infection caused by a DAP-susceptible Enterococcus faecium (minimum inhibitory concentration, 3 µg/mL) harboring genetic changes associated with DAP resistance, with persistent bacteremia and selection of additional resistances. Daptomycin monotherapy should be used cautiously against DAP-susceptible E. faecium strains with minimum inhibitory concentrations >2 µg/mL.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bacteriemia , Daptomicina , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia , Daptomicina/administración & dosificación , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Enterococcus faecium/aislamiento & purificación , Resultado Fatal , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a serious, difficult-to-treat infection, especially when caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Vancomycin has been the standard treatment for MRSA infection, but lower response rates in MRSA skin infections have been reported. This analysis assessed the outcome and safety of daptomycin therapy in patients with a DFI caused by MRSA. METHODS: Using the Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience and the European Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience (2006-2009), 79 patients with MRSA DFI were identified and included in this analysis. RESULTS: In the 74 evaluable patients, daptomycin was administered at a median dose of 4.8 mg/kg primarily every 24 hours (85.1%) and for a median of 15.0 days. Overall, 77.0% of the patients (57 of 74) received initial therapy with activity against MRSA; however, of patients receiving daptomycin as second-line therapy (n = 31), only 45.2% were treated with an antibiotic agent active against MRSA. The overall clinical success and treatment failure rates were 89.2% and 10.8%, respectively. Success with daptomycin therapy was higher in patients who had surgery and in those whose initial therapy was daptomycin. Eleven patients had 14 adverse events, two of which were possibly related to daptomycin use and led to discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: In a large real-world cohort of patients with MRSA DFI, daptomycin therapy was shown to be generally well tolerated and effective. The use of an anti-MRSA antibiotic agent should be considered when implementing first-line antibiotic drug therapy for DFI in countries where MRSA is common to avoid inappropriate empirical treatment and potential negative effects on outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Pie Diabético/tratamiento farmacológico , Pie Diabético/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To collect data about non-controlled prescribing use of daptomycin and its impact among Brazilian patients with serious Gram positive bacterial infection, as well as the efficacy and safety outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a multi-center, retrospective, non-interventional registry (August 01, 2009 to June 30, 2011) to collect data on 120 patients (44 patients in the first year and 76 patients in the second year) who had received at least one dose of commercial daptomycin in Brazil for the treatment of serious Gram-positive bacterial infection. RESULTS: Right-sided endocarditis (15.8%), complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI)wound (15.0%) and bacteremia-catheter-related (14.2%) were the most frequent primary infections; lung (21.7%) was the most common site for infection. Daptomycin was used empirically in 76 (63.3%) patients, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common suspected pathogen (86.1%). 82.5% of the cultures were obtained prior to or shortly after initiation of daptomycin therapy. Staphylococcus spp. - coagulase negative, MRSA, and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus were the most frequently identified pathogens (23.8%, 23.8% and 12.5%, respectively). The most common daptomycin dose administered for bacteremia and cSSTI was 6 mg/kg (30.6%) and 4 mg/kg (51.7%), respectively. The median duration of inpatient daptomycin therapy was 14 days. Most patients (57.1%) did not receive daptomycin while in intensive care unit. Carbapenem (22.5%) was the most commonly used antibiotic concomitantly. The patients showed clinical improvement after two days (median) following the start of daptomycin therapy. The clinical success rate was 80.8% and the overall rate of treatment failure was 10.8%. The main reasons for daptomycin discontinuation were successful end of therapy (75.8%), switched therapy (11.7%), and treatment failure (4.2%). Daptomycin demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile regardless of treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin had a relevant role in the treatment of Gram-positive infections in the clinical practice setting in Brazil.
Asunto(s)
Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Brasil , Daptomicina/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To collect data about non-controlled prescribing use of daptomycin and its impact among Brazilian patients with serious Gram positive bacterial infection, as well as the efficacy and safety outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a multi-center, retrospective, non-interventional registry (August 01, 2009 to June 30, 2011) to collect data on 120 patients (44 patients in the first year and 76 patients in the second year) who had received at least one dose of commercial daptomycin in Brazil for the treatment of serious Gram-positive bacterial infection. RESULTS: Right-sided endocarditis (15.8%), complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI)-wound (15.0%) and bacteremia-catheter-related (14.2%) were the most frequent primary infections; lung (21.7%) was the most common site for infection. Daptomycin was used empirically in 76 (63.3%) patients, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common suspected pathogen (86.1%). 82.5% of the cultures were obtained prior to or shortly after initiation of daptomycin therapy. Staphylococcus spp. - coagulase negative, MRSA, and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus were the most frequently identified pathogens (23.8%, 23.8% and 12.5%, respectively). The most common daptomycin dose administered for bacteremia and cSSTI was 6mg/kg (30.6%) and 4mg/kg (51.7%), respectively. The median duration of inpatient daptomycin therapy was 14 days. Most patients (57.1%) did not receive daptomycin while in intensive care unit. Carbapenem (22.5%) was the most commonly used antibiotic concomitantly. The patients showed clinical improvement after two days (median) following the start of daptomycin therapy. The clinical success rate was 80.8% and the overall rate of treatment failure was 10.8%. The main reasons for daptomycin discontinuation were successful end of therapy (75.8%), switched therapy (11.7%), and treatment failure (4.2%). Daptomycin demonstrated a favorable safety and tolerability profile regardless of treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin had a relevant role in the treatment of Gram-positive infections in the clinical practice setting in Brazil.