RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) were especially vulnerable, and modes of medical care delivery shifted rapidly. This study assessed the impact of the pandemic on care for people with ADRD, examining the use of primary, emergency, and long-term care, as well as deaths due to COVID and to other causes. METHODS: Among 4.2 million beneficiaries aged 66 and older with ADRD in traditional Medicare, monthly deaths and claims for routine care (doctors' office and telehealth visits), inpatient/emergency department (ED) visits, and long-term care facility use from March or June 2020 through December 2022 are compared to monthly rates predicted from January-December 2019 using OLS and logistic/negative binomial regression. Correlation analyses examine the association between excess deaths - due to COVID and non-COVID causes - and changes in care use in the beneficiary's state of residence. RESULTS: Increased telehealth visits more than offset reduced office visits, with primary care visits increasing overall (by 9 percent from June 2020 onward relative to the predicted rate from 2019, p < .001). Emergency/inpatient visits declined (by 9 percent, p < .001) and long-term care facility use declined, remaining 14% below the 2019 trend from June 2020 onward (p < .001). Both COVID and non-COVID deaths rose, with 231,000 excess deaths (16% above the prediction from 2019), over 80 percent of which were attributable to COVID. Excess deaths were higher among women, non-White patients, those in rural and isolated zip codes, and those with higher social deprivation index scores. States with the largest increases in primary care visits had the lowest excess deaths (correlation -0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with ADRD had substantial deaths above pre-pandemic projections during the COVID-19 pandemic, 80 percent of which were attributed to COVID-19. Routine care increased overall due to a dramatic increase in telehealth visits, but this was uneven across states, and mortality rates were significantly lower in states with higher than pre-pandemic visits.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Demencia , Telemedicina , Humanos , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Telemedicina/tendencias , Demencia/epidemiología , Demencia/mortalidad , Demencia/terapia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medicare/tendencias , Visita a Consultorio Médico/tendencias , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/tendencias , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Choosing the right intensity of medical care is a huge challenge particularly in long-term geriatric care. The Nascher score was developed to assess future medical care needs. The aim of this study was to determine whether the Nascher score and a revised version can predict future medical needs. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 396 residents in long-term care hospitals, who were admitted over a period of two years and followed up to two and a half yeare, were analysed. Outcome parameters were: (1) number of medication changes, (2) number of ward doctor documentations and (3) number of acute illnesses treated with antibiotics, and mortality risk. Based on the first results, an alternative scoring of the Nascher score with 12 instead of 26 items was developed, called the revised Nascher score. RESULTS: The Nascher score significantly correlated with the number of medication changes, the number of ward doctor documentations, and the number of acute ilnesses treated with antibiotics with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.30, 0.26, and 0.15, respectively. The revised Nascher score showed a higher correlation with correlation coefficients of 0.36, 0.26, and 0.21, respectively. Residents with a Nascher score in the highest quartile had a significantly higher mortality risk than residents in the lowest quartile (hazard ratio, HR 2.97, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.80-4.34). The corresponding values for the revised Nascher score were HR 3.03, 95% CI 2.03-4.54 in the highest and HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.24-2.60 in the middle quartiles. CONCLUSION: The Nascher score and even more so the revised Nascher score are well suited to predicting the various parameters of future medical needs and mortality risk.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación Geriátrica , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Austria/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Riesgo , Predicción , Pronóstico , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify combinations of long-term services and supports (LTSS) Veterans use, describe transitions between groups, and identify factors influencing transition. METHODS: We explored LTSS across a continuum from home to institutional care. Analyses included 104,837 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients 66 years and older at high-risk of long-term institutional care (LTIC). We conduct latent class and latent transition analyses using VHA and Medicare data from fiscal years 2014 to 2017. We used logistic regression to identify variables associated with transition. RESULTS: We identified 5 latent classes: (1) No Services (11% of sample in 2015); (2) Medicare Services (31%), characterized by using LTSS only in Medicare; (3) VHA-Medicare Care Continuum (19%), including LTSS use in various settings across VHA and Medicare; (4) Personal Care Services (21%), characterized by high probabilities of using VHA homemaker/home health aide or self-directed care; and (5) Home-Centered Interdisciplinary Care (18%), characterized by a high probability of using home-based primary care. Veterans frequently stayed in the same class over the three years (30% to 46% in each class). Having a hip fracture, self-care impairment, or severe ambulatory limitation increased the odds of leaving No Services, and incontinence and dementia increased the odds of entering VHA-Medicare Care Continuum. Results were similar when restricted to Veterans who survived during all 3 years of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Veterans at high risk of LTIC use a combination of services from across the care continuum and a mix of VHA and Medicare services. Service patterns are relatively stable for 3 years.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Medicare , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Femenino , Masculino , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
This study investigated sex differences perceived relocation stress and glycemic control among older adults with type 2 diabetes in long-term care facilities. A cross-sectional correlation design was used to recruit 120 residents during their first year after moving into the facilities in southern Taiwan. The results showed that almost two-thirds of the participants (64.2%) were women. The mean age was 79.62 (SD = 1.71). Older women with diabetes were reported to have significantly lower levels of education and poor glycemic control but higher levels of perceived relocation stress than men; however, functional independence was significantly higher in men. Although perceived relocation stress significantly predicted HbA1c levels in both women and men, length of stay was also significant in predicting HbA1c levels in women. These findings indicate the need for effective physical and psychological measures to improve glycemic control during the first year of stay in long-term care facilities.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Control Glucémico , Estrés Psicológico , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Control Glucémico/métodos , Control Glucémico/psicología , Taiwán , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores Sexuales , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/psicología , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/normas , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Glucemia/análisisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nearly 2.9 million older Americans with lower incomes live in subsidized housing. While regional and single-site studies show that this group has higher rates of healthcare utilization compared to older adults in the general community, little is known about healthcare utilization nationally nor associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 enrolled in the National Health and Aging Trends Study in 2011, linked to Medicare claims data, including individuals living in subsidized housing and the general community. Participants were followed annually through 2020. Outcomes were hospitalization, short-term skilled nursing facility (SNF) utilization, long-term care utilization, and death. Fine-Gray competing risks regression analysis was used to assess the association of subsidized housing residence with hospitalization and nursing facility utilization, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess the association with death. RESULTS: Among 6294 participants (3600 women, 2694 men; mean age, 75.5 years [SD, 7.0]), 295 lived in subsidized housing at baseline and 5999 in the general community. Compared to older adults in the general community, those in subsidized housing had a higher adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] of hospitalization (sHR 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03-1.43), short-term SNF utilization (sHR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15-1.92), and long-term care utilization (sHR 2.72; 95% CI, 1.67-4.43), but similar hazard of death (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.69-1.08). Individuals with functional impairment had a higher adjusted subdistribution hazard of hospitalization and short-term SNF utilization and individuals with dementia and functional impairment had a higher hazard of long-term care utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults living in subsidized housing have higher hazards of hospitalization and nursing facility utilization compared to those in the general community. Housing-based interventions to optimize aging in place and mitigate risk of nursing facility utilization should consider risk factors including functional impairment and dementia.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Medicare , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Humanos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Vivienda Popular/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine reported cases of abuse in long-term care (LTC) homes in the province of Ontario, Canada, to determine the extent and nature of abuse experienced by residents between 2019 and 2022. DESIGN: A qualitative mixed methods study was conducted using document analysis and descriptive statistics. Three data sources were analysed: LTC legislation, inspection reports from a publicly available provincial government administrative database and articles published by major Canadian newspapers. A data extraction tool was developed that included variables such as the date of inspection, the type of inspection, findings and the section of legislation cited. Descriptive analyses, including counts and percentages, were calculated to identify the number of incidents and the type of abuse reported. RESULTS: According to legislation, LTC homes are required to protect residents from physical, sexual, emotional, verbal or financial abuse. The review of legislation revealed that inspectors are responsible for ensuring homes comply with this requirement. An analysis of their reports identified that 9% (781) of overall inspections included findings of abuse. Physical abuse was the most common type (37%). Differences between the frequency of abuse across type of ownership, location and size of the home were found. There were 385 LTC homes with at least one reported case of abuse, and 55% of these homes had repeated incidents. The analysis of newspaper articles corroborated the findings of abuse in the inspection reports and provided resident and family perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial differences between legislation intended to protect LTC residents from abuse and the abuse occurring in LTC homes. Strategies such as establishing a climate of trust, investing in staff and leadership, providing standardised education and training and implementing a quality and safety framework could improve the care and well-being of LTC residents.
Asunto(s)
Abuso de Ancianos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Casas de Salud , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/normas , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/métodos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud/normas , Casas de Salud/organización & administración , Ontario , Abuso de Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Abuso de Ancianos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Abuso de Ancianos/prevención & control , Anciano , Femenino , MasculinoRESUMEN
We aimed to identify the clinical subtypes in individuals starting long-term care in Japan and examined their association with prognoses. Using linked medical insurance claims data and survey data for care-need certification in a large city, we identified participants who started long-term care. Grouping them based on 22 diseases recorded in the past 6 months using fuzzy c-means clustering, we examined the longitudinal association between clusters and death or care-need level deterioration within 2 years. We analyzed 4,648 participants (median age 83 [interquartile range 78-88] years, female 60.4%) between October 2014 and March 2019 and categorized them into (i) musculoskeletal and sensory, (ii) cardiac, (iii) neurological, (iv) respiratory and cancer, (v) insulin-dependent diabetes, and (vi) unspecified subtypes. The results of clustering were replicated in another city. Compared with the musculoskeletal and sensory subtype, the adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for death was 1.22 (1.05-1.42), 1.81 (1.54-2.13), and 1.21 (1.00-1.46) for the cardiac, respiratory and cancer, and insulin-dependent diabetes subtypes, respectively. The care-need levels more likely worsened in the cardiac, respiratory and cancer, and unspecified subtypes than in the musculoskeletal and sensory subtype. In conclusion, distinct clinical subtypes exist among individuals initiating long-term care.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Japón/epidemiología , Análisis por Conglomerados , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/clasificaciónRESUMEN
This population-based study analyzes hip fracture and osteoporosis treatment rates among older adults, stratified by place of residence prior to fracture. Hip fracture rates were higher among older adults living in the community and discharged to long-term care (LTC) after fracture, compared to LTC residents and older adults living in the community. Only 23% of LTC residents at high fracture risk received osteoporosis treatment. PURPOSE: This population-based study examines hip fracture rate and osteoporosis management among long-term care (LTC) residents > 65 years of age compared to community-dwelling older adults at the time of fracture and admitted to LTC after fracture, in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Healthcare utilization and administrative databases were linked using unique, encoded identifiers from the ICES Data Repository to estimate hip fractures (identified using the Public Health Agency of Canada algorithm and International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes) and osteoporosis management (pharmacotherapy) among adults > 66 years from April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2018. Sex-specific and age-standardized rates were compared by pre-fracture residency and discharge location (i.e., LTC to LTC, community to LTC, or community to community). Fracture risk was determined using the Fracture Risk Scale (FRS). RESULTS: At baseline (2014/15), the overall age-standardized hip fracture rate among LTC residents was 223 per 10,000 person-years (173 per 10,000 females and 157 per 10,000 males), 509 per 10,000 person-years (468 per 10,000 females and 320 per 10,000 males) among the community to LTC cohort, and 31.5 per 10,000 person-years (43.1 per 10,000 females and 25.6 per 10,000 males). During the 5-year observation period, the overall annual average percent change (APC) for hip fracture increased significantly in LTC (AAPC = + 8.6 (95% CI 5.0 to 12.3; p = 0.004) compared to the community to LTC group (AAPC = + 2.5 (95% CI - 3.0 to 8.2; p = 0.248)) and the community-to-community cohort (AAPC - 3.8 (95% CI - 6.7 to - 0.7; p = 030)). However, hip fracture rate remained higher in the community to LTC group over the study period. There were 33,594 LTC residents identified as high risk of fracture (FRS score 4 +), of which 7777 were on treatment (23.3%). CONCLUSION: Overall, hip fracture rates have increased in LTC and among community-dwelling adults admitted to LTC after fracture. However, hip fracture rates among community-dwelling adults have decreased over time. A non-significant increase in osteoporosis treatment rates was observed among LTC residents at high risk of fracture (FRS4 +). Residents in LTC are at very high risk for fracture and require individualized based on goals of care and life expectancy.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera , Osteoporosis , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Humanos , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Ontario/epidemiología , Osteoporosis/epidemiología , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Vida Independiente/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In April 2012, the Japanese government launched a new nursing service called the nursing small-scale multifunctional home care (NSMHC) to meet the nursing care demands of individuals with moderate-to-severe activities of daily living (ADLs) dysfunction and who require medical care, thereby allowing them to continue living in the community. We aimed to preliminarily analyse the characteristics of first-time users of NSMHC service. DESIGN: This pooled cross-sectional study used the Japanese long-term care insurance (LTCI) claims data from the users' first use of NSMHC (from April 2012 to December 2019). SETTING: NSMHC includes nursing home visits, home care, daycare, overnight stays and medical treatment. PARTICIPANTS: The study population included LTCI beneficiaries who received their first long-term care requirement certification in Japan from April 2012 onwards, died between April 2012 and December 2019, and used any LTCI service at least once. RESULTS: Among the 836 563 individuals who used any LTCI service at least once, 3957 (0.47%) used NSMHC. We analysed 3634 individuals without any missing data regarding long-term care requirement certification. Most individuals were aged 80 years or older, with 64.3% requiring care level 3 or above, indicating complete assistance with ADLs. Regarding ADLs in individuals with dementia, 70.6% were at level 2 or below, indicating they can live almost independently even with dementia. A large proportion of NSMHC users availed the service approximately 6 months before death, with no prior use of any LTCI services; they continued using the service for around 4 months, although some people continued to use NSMHC until their month of death. CONCLUSIONS: Using individual data on nationwide LTCI, we described the characteristics of first-time users of NSMHC among those who died within 7.5 years from the first certification of care needs. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of NSMHC use on user outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Seguro de Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Japón , Femenino , Masculino , Seguro de Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pueblos del Este de AsiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate, among elderly patients in long-term care (LTC) facilities, potentially inappropriate drug prescriptions, potentially interactions and verify whether they can be traced back to hospitalisations or accesses to the Emergency Department (ED). The study data were acquired by means of a case report form investigating the medication management process in LTCs. MATERIAL AND METHODS Analysis of pharmacutilisation in LTCFs patients aged ≥65 years on polypharmacy or excessive polypharmacy, January-July 2023. Data was extracted from a database (DB) containing the monthly prescriptions of medicines supplied by direct distribution (DD) to LTCs. The prevalence of PIMs was evaluated by applying the Beers and STOPP criteria to the medication profile of each patient. RESULTS The overall prevalence of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy was 83% and 17%, respectively. PIMs were defined using Beers and STOPP criteria. The most frequent PIMs were proton pump inhibitors (19% e 15%), antiplatelets agent (17% e 13%) and non-associated sulfonamides (14% e 12%). Of the 1,921 PIMs, 121 were contraindicated or very serious (6%) and 1,800 were major (94%).The most common medicaments involved in drug-drug interaction are furosemide (21%), sertraline (19%), pantoprazole (16%) e trazodone (15%). LTCs participating in the study (56%) excluded polypharmacy as a cause of access to the ED and ADRs. Therefore no case was ever reported (100%). CONCLUSIONS Polypharmacy or excessive polypharmacy among elderly patients may increase PIMs and ADRs. A constant review of the therapeutic regimens and deprescribing decrease inappropriate use of medications and interactions, ADRs, and accesses to the ED with consequent reduction of pharmaceutical spending.
Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Polifarmacia , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Italia , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Medical care and long-term care utilization in the last year of life of frail older adults could be a key indicator of their quality of life. This study aimed to identify the medical care expenditure (MCE) trajectories in the last year of life of frail older adults by investigating the association between MCE and long-term care utilization in each trajectory. METHODS: The retrospective cohort study of three municipalities in Japan included 405 decedents (median age at death, 85 years; 189 women [46.7%]) from a cohort of 1,658 frail older adults aged ≥65 years who were newly certified as support level in the long-term care insurance program from April 2012 to March 2013. This study used long-term care and medical insurance claim data from April 2012 to March 2017. The primary outcome was MCE over the 12 months preceding death. Group-based trajectory modeling was conducted to identify the MCE trajectories. A mixed-effect model was employed to examine the association between long-term care utilization and MCE in each trajectory. RESULTS: Participants were stratified into four groups based on MCE trajectories over the 12 months preceding death as follows: rising (n = 159, 39.3%), persistently high (n = 143, 35.3%), minimal (n = 56, 13.8%), and descending (n = 47, 11.6%) groups. Home-based long-term care utilization was associated with increased MCE in the descending trajectory (coefficient, 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.62). Facility-based long-term care utilization was associated with reduced MCE in the rising trajectory (coefficient, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.50-0.69). Both home-based (coefficient, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85-0.99) and facility-based (coefficient; 0.53; 95% CI, 0.41-0.63) long-term care utilization were associated with reduced MCE in the persistently high trajectory. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may facilitate the integration of medical and long-term care models at the end of life in frail older adults.
Asunto(s)
Anciano Frágil , Gastos en Salud , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano Frágil/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidado Terminal/economía , Japón , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
Introduction: Residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are at high risk of morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19, especially when new variants of concern (VOC) emerge. To provide intradisciplinary data in order to tailor public health interventions during future epidemics, available epidemiologic and genomic data from Slovenian LTCFs during the initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic was analyzed. Methods: The first part of the study included SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcription Real-Time PCR (rtRT-PCR) positive LTCF residents, from 21 facilities with COVID-19 outbreaks occurring in October 2020. The second part of the study included SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR positive LTCF residents and staff between January and April 2021, when VOC Alpha emerged in Slovenia. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to acquire SARS-CoV-2 genomes, and lineage determination. In-depth phylogenetic and mutational profile analysis were performed and coupled with available field epidemiological data to assess the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 introduction and transmission. Results: 370/498 SARS-CoV-2 positive residents as well as 558/699 SARS-CoV-2 positive residents and 301/358 staff were successfully sequenced in the first and second part of the study, respectively. In October 2020, COVID-19 outbreaks in the 21 LTCFs were caused by intra-facility transmission as well as multiple independent SARS-CoV-2 introductions. The Alpha variant was confirmed in the first LTCF resident approximately 1.5 months after the first Alpha case was identified in Slovenia. The data also showed a slower replacement of existing variants by Alpha in residents compared to staff and the general population. Discussion: Multiple SARS CoV-2 introductions as well as intra-facility spreading impacted disease transmission in Slovenian LTCFs. Timely implementation of control measures aimed at limiting new introductions while controlling in-facility transmission are of paramount importance, especially as new VOCs emerge. Sequencing, in conjunction with epidemiological data, can facilitate the determination of the need for future improvements in control measures to protect LTCF residents from COVID-19 or other respiratory infections.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , COVID-19/prevención & control , Eslovenia/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Brotes de Enfermedades , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Filogenia , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Understanding the preferences of old-age adults for their long-term caregivers can improve person-centred health care and the quality of long-term care (LTC). This study examines Chinese older adults' preferences for long-term caregivers. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study. METHODS: A national representative discrete choice experiment (DCE) surveyed 2031 adults aged 50-70 across 12 provinces in China. Each DCE scenario described five attributes: type of caregivers, place of LTC, contents of LTC, out-of-pocket payments, and quality of life (QoL). Preferences and the marginal willingness to pay (WTP) were derived using mixed-logit and latent class models. RESULTS: Older adults displayed higher preferences for long-term caregivers who improve their QoL, incur lower out-of-pocket payments, and provide medical LTC services at home, with the maximum WTP of $22.832 per month. QoL was rated as the most important LTC factor, followed by the place of LTC and the type of caregivers. When the level of QoL improved from poor to good, respondents would be willing to pay $18.375 per month more (95% confidence interval: 16.858 to 20.137), and the uptake rate increased by 76.47%. There was preference heterogeneity among older people with different sex, education, family size, and knowledge of LTC insurance. CONCLUSION: QoL was the most important factor in older Chinese adults' preference for caregivers. Home care and medical care from formal caregivers was preferred by older adults. We recommend training family caregivers, raising older people's awareness of LTC insurance, and guiding policymakers in developing people-oriented LTC and a multi-level LTC system.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Conducta de Elección , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Cuidadores/psicología , Cuidadores/estadística & datos numéricos , China , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Moving into a long-term care facility (LTCF) requires substantial personal, societal and financial investment. Identifying those at high risk of short-term mortality after LTCF entry can help with care planning and risk factor management. This study aimed to: (i) examine individual-, facility-, medication-, system- and healthcare-related predictors for 90-day mortality at entry into an LTCF and (ii) create risk profiles for this outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from the Registry of Senior Australians. SUBJECTS: Individuals aged ≥ 65 years old with first-time permanent entry into an LTCF in three Australian states between 01 January 2013 and 31 December 2016. METHODS: A prediction model for 90-day mortality was developed using Cox regression with the purposeful variable selection approach. Individual-, medication-, system- and healthcare-related factors known at entry into an LTCF were examined as predictors. Harrell's C-index assessed the predictive ability of our risk models. RESULTS: 116,192 individuals who entered 1,967 facilities, of which 9.4% (N = 10,910) died within 90 days, were studied. We identified 51 predictors of mortality, five of which were effect modifiers. The strongest predictors included activities of daily living category (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.99-5.88 for high vs low), high level of complex health conditions (HR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.58-1.77 for high vs low), several medication classes and male sex (HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.53-1.65). The model out-of-sample Harrell's C-index was 0.773. CONCLUSIONS: Our mortality prediction model, which includes several strongly associated factors, can moderately well identify individuals at high risk of mortality upon LTCF entry.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Australia/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Actividades Cotidianas , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Hogares para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos de Riesgos ProporcionalesRESUMEN
AIMS: To examine national trends in glucose lowering medicine (GLM) use among older people with diabetes in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) during 2009-2019. METHODS: A repeated cross-sectional study of individuals ≥65 years with diabetes in Australian LTCFs (n = 140,322) was conducted. Annual age-sex standardised prevalence of GLM use and number of defined daily doses (DDDs)/1000 resident-days were estimated. Multivariable Poisson or Negative binomial regression models were used to estimate adjusted rate ratios (aRRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Prevalence of GLM use remained steady between 2009 (63.9%, 95 %CI 63.3-64.4) and 2019 (64.3%, 95 %CI 63.9-64.8) (aRR 1.00, 95 %CI 1.00-1.00). The percentage of residents receiving metformin increased from 36.0% (95 %CI 35.3-36.7) to 43.5% (95 %CI 42.9-44.1) (aRR 1.01, 95 %CI 1.01-1.01). Insulin use also increased from 21.5% (95 %CI 21.0-22.0) to 27.0% (95 %CI 26.5-27.5) (aRR 1.02, 95 %CI 1.02-1.02). Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor use increased from 1.0% (95 %CI 0.9-1.1) to 21.1% (95 %CI 20.7-21.5) (aRR 1.24, 95 %CI 1.24-1.25), while sulfonylurea use decreased from 34.4% (95 %CI 33.8-35.1) to 19.3% (95 %CI 18.9-19.7) (aRR 0.93, 95 %CI 0.93-0.94). Similar trends were observed in DDDs/1000 resident days. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing use of insulin and ongoing use of sulfonylureas suggests a need to implement evidence-based strategies to optimise diabetes care in LTCFs.
Asunto(s)
Hipoglucemiantes , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Humanos , Anciano , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/tendencias , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Australia/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
One-fourth of nursing home residents are diagnosed with anxiety disorders and approximately half live with depression. Nursing homes have long struggled with staffing shortages, and the lack of care has further heightened the risk of poor mental health. A key solution to both problems could be immigration. Prior studies have documented how immigrant labor could strengthen the long-term care workforce. We add to this picture by exploring the impact of immigrant inflows on the mental health outcomes of nursing home residents. Using a nationally representative dataset and a shift-share instrumental variable approach, we find empirical evidence that immigration reduces diagnoses of depression and anxiety, the use of antidepressant and antianxiety drugs, and self-assessed symptoms of depression. The results are robust to several sensitivity tests. We further find that the effect is more substantial in facilities with lower direct care staff hours per resident and with likely more immigrants without citizenship. Language barriers tend to be a minor issue when providing essential care. The findings suggest that creating a policy framework that directs immigrant labor to the long-term care sector can mutually benefit job-seeking immigrants and nursing home residents.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Casas de Salud , Humanos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Emigración e Inmigración/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Depresión/epidemiología , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ansiedad , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/psicología , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos Humanos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Importance: More than 70â¯000 Medicare beneficiaries receive care in long-term acute care hospitals (LTCHs) annually for prolonged acute illness. However, little is known about long-term functional and cognitive outcomes of middle-aged and older adults after hospitalization in an LTCH. Objective: To describe survival, functional, and cognitive status after LTCH hospitalization and to identify factors associated with an adverse outcome. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included middle-aged and older adults enrolled in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) with linked fee-for-service Medicare claims. Included participants were aged 50 years or older with an LTCH admission between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2016, with HRS interviews available before admission. Data were analyzed between November 1, 2021, and June 30, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Function and cognition were ascertained from HRS interviews conducted every 2 years. The primary outcome was death or severe impairment in the 2.5 years after LTCH hospitalization, defined as dependencies in 2 or more activities of daily living (ADLs) or dementia. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations with a priori selected risk factors including pre-LTCH survival prognosis (Lee index score), pre-LTCH impairment status, and illness severity characterized by receipt of mechanical ventilation and prolonged intensive care unit stay of 3 days or longer. Results: This study included 396 participants, with a median age of 75 (IQR, 68-82) years. Of the participants, 201 (51%) were women, 125 (28%) had severe impairment, and 318 (80%) died or survived with severe impairment (functional, cognitive, or both) within 2.5 years of LTCH hospitalization. After accounting for acute illness characteristics, prehospitalization survival prognosis as determined by the Lee index score and severe baseline impairment (functional, cognitive, or both) were associated with an increased likelihood of death or severe impairment in the 2.5 years after LTCH hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.2 [95% CI, 1.7 to 6.0] for a 5-point increase in Lee index score; and AOR, 4.5 [95% CI, 1.3 to 15.4] for severe vs no impairment). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, 4 of 5 middle-aged and older adults died or survived with severe impairment within 2.5 years of LTCH hospitalization. Better preadmission survival prognosis and functional and cognitive status were associated with lower risk of an adverse outcome, and these findings should inform decision-making for older adults with prolonged acute illness.
Asunto(s)
Cognición , Hospitalización , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Actividades Cotidianas , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Background: With the rapid aging of the population, the health needs of the older adult have increased significantly, resulting in the frequent occurrence of the "social hospitalization" problem, which has led to a rapid increase in hospitalization costs. This study investigates whether the "social hospitalization problem" arising from the long-term care needs can be solved through the implementation of long-term care insurance, thereby improving the overall health of the older adults and controlling the unreasonable increase in hospitalization costs. Methods: The entropy theory was used as a conceptual model, based on data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) in 2015 and 2018. The least-squares method was used to examine the relationship between long-term care needs and hospitalization costs, and the role that long-term care insurance implementation plays in its path of influence. Results: The results of this study indicated that long-term care needs would increase hospitalization cost, which remained stable after a series of tests, such as replacing the core explanatory variables and introducing fixed effects. Through the intermediary effect test and mediated adjustment effect test, we found the action path of long-term care needs on hospitalization costs. Long-term care needs increases hospitalization costs through more hospitalizations. Long-term care insurance reduces hospitalization costs. Its specific action path makes long-term care insurance reduce hospitalization costs through a negative adjustment of the number of hospitalizations. Conclusion: To achieve fair and sustainable development of long-term care insurance, the following points should be achieved: First, long-term care insurance should consider the prevention in advance and expand the scope of participation and coverage; Second, long-term care insurance should consider the control in the event and set moderate levels of treatment payments; Third, long-term care insurance should consider post-supervision and explore appropriate payment methods.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Seguro de Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Humanos , Seguro de Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Seguro de Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Longitudinales , China , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the number of recipients with active transplants under the care of transplant centers in 2022 and the current volume and needs for continuous and long-term care in this group of transplant recipients. Data came from the organ transplant registry, one of the registries maintained by the Polish Transplant Coordinating Center Poltransplant. We included recipients of individual organs who, on January 1, 2022, were living with an active transplant performed in previous years and recipients who received a transplant in 2022. The number of recipients under the care of transplant centers in 2022 was 20,994 (55% of all transplants performed in Poland since the beginning of activity in 1966).
Asunto(s)
Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Trasplante de Órganos , Sistema de Registros , Receptores de Trasplantes , Humanos , Trasplante de Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Polonia , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Residential long-term care (LTC) use has declined in many countries over the past years. This study quantifies how changing rates of entry, exit, and mortality have contributed to trends in life expectancy in LTC (i.e., average time spent in LTC after age 65) across sociodemographic groups. METHODS: We analyzed population-register data of all Finns aged ≥65 during 1999-2018 (nâ =â 2,016,987) with dates of LTC and death and sociodemographic characteristics. We estimated transition rates between home, LTC, and death using Poisson generalized additive models, and calculated multistate life tables across 1999-2003, 2004-2008, 2009-2013, and 2014-2018. RESULTS: Between 1999-2003 and 2004-2008, life expectancy in LTC increased from 0.75 (95% CI: 0.74-0.76) to 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88-0.90) years among men and from 1.61 (95% CI: 1.59-1.62) to 1.83 (95% CI: 1.81-1.85) years among women, mainly due to declining exit rates from LTC. Thereafter, life expectancy in LTC decreased, reaching 0.80 (95% CI: 0.79-0.81) and 1.51 (95% CI: 1.50-1.53) years among men and women, respectively, in 2014-2018. Especially among women and nonmarried men, the decline was largely due to increasing death rates in LTC. Admission rates declined throughout the study period, which offset the increase in life expectancy in LTC attributable to declining mortality in the community. Marital status differences in life expectancy in LTC narrowed over time. DISCUSSION: Recent declines in LTC use were driven by postponed LTC admission closer to death. The results suggest that across sociodemographic strata older adults enter LTC in even worse health and spend a shorter time in care than before.