RESUMEN

Hypertensive crises in pediatric patients are rare conditions. However, determining their precise prevalence is more challenging than in adults due to the heterogeneity in the definition itself. These crises frequently occur without a prior diagnosis of hypertension and may indicate an underlying cause of secondary hypertension, including pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL). The mechanisms of hypertensive crises in the pediatric population with PPGL are directly related to different types of catecholamine excess. Noradrenergic tumors typically present with sustained hypertension due to their predominant action on α1-adrenoceptors in the vasculature. Conversely, adrenergic tumors, through epinephrine binding to ß2-adrenoceptors in addition to stimulation of α1- and α2-adrenoceptors, more frequently cause paroxysmal hypertension. Furthermore, the biochemical phenotype also reflects the tumor localization and the presence of a genetic mutation. Recent evidence suggests that more than 80% of PPGL in pediatric cases have a hereditary background. PPGL susceptibility mutations are categorized into three clusters; mutations in cluster 1 are more frequently associated with a noradrenergic phenotype, whereas those in cluster 2 are associated with an adrenergic phenotype. Consequently, the treatment of hypertensive crises in pediatric patients with PPGL, reflecting the underlying pathophysiology, requires first-line therapy with alpha-blockers, potentially in combination with beta-blockers only in the case of tachyarrhythmia after adequate alpha-blockade. The route of administration for treatment depends on the context, such as intraoperative or pre-surgical settings, and whether it presents as a hypertensive emergency (elevated blood pressure with acute target organ damage), where intravenous administration of antihypertensive drugs is mandatory. Conversely, in cases of hypertensive urgency, if children can tolerate oral therapy, intravenous administration may initially be avoided. However, managing these cases is complex and requires careful consideration of the selection and timing of therapy administration, particularly in pediatric patients. Therefore, facing these conditions in tertiary care centers through interdisciplinary collaboration is advisable to optimize therapeutic outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive crisis is an acute increase in blood pressure >180/120 mm Hg. A titratable antihypertensive agent is preferred to lower blood pressure acutely in a controlled way and prevent an abrupt overcorrection. Nicardipine and clevidipine are both dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers that provide unique benefits for blood pressure control. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of nicardipine or clevidipine for blood pressure control in the setting of hypertensive crisis. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Eligible patients received either nicardipine or clevidipine for the treatment of hypertensive crisis. The primary outcome was achievement of 25% reduction in mean arterial pressure at 1 h. The secondary outcome was achievement of a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of <160 mm Hg at 2-6 h from the start of the infusion. RESULTS: This study included a total of 156 patients, 74 in the nicardipine group and 82 in the clevidipine group. The SBP on admission and at the start of the infusion were similar between groups. There was no difference between groups in achieving a 25% reduction in mean arterial pressure at 1 h. Nicardipine achieved an SBP goal of <160 mm Hg at 2-6 h significantly more often than the clevidipine group (89.2% vs. 73.2%; p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference between agents for initial blood pressure control in the treatment of hypertensive crisis. Nicardipine showed more sustained SBP control, with a lower risk of rebound hypertension and a significant cost savings compared with clevidipine.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Systemic arterial hypertension (HTN) is the main cause of morbidity and mortality, and HTN crises contribute significantly to an unfavourable clinical course. For decades, HTN crises have been dichotomized into hypertensive emergency (HTN-E) and hypertensive urgency (HTN-U). The main difference between the two is the presence of acute hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) - if HMOD is present, HTN crisis is HTN-E; if not, it is HTN-U. Patients with HTN-E are in a life-threatening situation. They are hospitalized and receive antihypertensive drugs intravenously (IV). On the other hand, patients with HTN-U are usually not hospitalized and receive their antihypertensives orally. We suggest a modification of the current risk stratification scheme for patients with HTN crises. The new category would be the intermediate risk group, more precisely the 'impending HTN-E' group, with a higher risk in comparison to HTN-U and a lower risk than HTN-E. 'Impending HMOD' means that HMOD has not occurred (yet), and the prognosis is, therefore, better than in patients with ongoing HMOD. There are three main reasons to classify patients as having impending HTN-E: excessively elevated BP, high-risk comorbidities, and ongoing bleeding/high bleeding risk. Their combinations are probable. This approach may enable us to prevent some HTNEs by avoiding acute HMOD using a timely blood pressure treatment. This treatment should be prompt but controlled.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Hypertensive emergencies cause substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly when acute organ injury is present. Careful and effective strategies to reduce blood pressure and diminish the effects of pressure-mediated injury are essential. While the selection of specific antihypertensive medications varies little across different forms of hypertensive emergencies, the intensity of blood pressure reduction to the target pressure differs substantially. Treatment hinges on balancing the positive effects of lowering blood pressure with the potential for negative effects of organ hypoperfusion in patients with altered autoregulatory mechanisms. When patients do not have acute organ injury in addition to severe hypertension, they benefit from a conservative, outpatient approach to blood pressure management. In all cases, long term control of blood pressure is paramount to prevent recurrent hypertensive emergencies and improve overall prognosis. This review discusses the current evidence and guidelines on the evaluation and management of hypertensive emergency.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hypertensive crisis (HC) encompasses hypertensive emergencies (HE) and urgencies (HU). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample was conducted, and all hospitalizations for HC were identified with their ICD-10 codes. A probability estimation of outcomes was calculated by performing multivariable logistic regression analysis, which took confounders into account. Our primary outcomes were SDs of HC. Secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), and transient ischemic attack (TIA). RESULTS: The minority populations were more likely than the Whites to be diagnosed with HCs: Black 2.7 (2.6-2.9), Hispanic 1.2 (1.2-1.3), and Asian population 1.4 (1.3-1.5), (p < 0.0001, all). Furthermore, being male 1.1 (1.09-1.2, p < 0.0001), those with 'self-pay' insurance 1.02 (1.01-1.03, p < 0.0001), and those in the <25th percentile of median household income 1.3 (1.2-1.3, p < 0.0001), were more likely to be diagnosed with HCs. The Black population had the highest likelihood of end-organ damage: MI 2.7 (2.6-2.9), Stroke 3.2 (3.1-3.4), AKI 2.4 (2.2-2.5), and TIA 2.8 (2.7-3.0), (p < 0.0001, all), compared to their Caucasian counterpart. CONCLUSIONS: Being of a minority population, male sex, low-income status, and uninsured were associated with a higher likelihood of hypertensive crisis. The black population was the youngest and had the highest risk of hypertensive emergencies. Targeted interventions and healthcare policies should be implemented to address these disparities and enhance patient outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This case report presents a history of familial hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis (FHHNC). The patient was admitted to the hospital with hypertensive encephalopathy. FHHNC is a rare autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in CLDN16 or CLDN19, resulting in insufficient magnesium and calcium kidney reabsorption. FHHNC manifestation starts in childhood, and over the years, its development leads to nephrocalcinosis and, consequently, chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is not slowed by routine administration of magnesium and thiazide diuretics. Ultimately, all FHHNC patients need kidney replacement therapy (KRT). CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 28-year-old male diagnosed with FHHNC and admitted to the emergency room due to hypertensive encephalopathy. The current situation was the patient's second hospitalization related to a hypertensive emergency caused by under-dialysis. Despite the signs of insufficient functioning of peritoneal dialysis (PD) (the primary chosen form of KRT), the patient refused the proposed conversion to hemodialysis (HD). Symptoms observed upon admission included disorientation, anxiety, and severe hypertension, reaching 213/123 mmHg. Due to his clinical condition, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU), where the introduction of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration and hypotensive therapy stabilized blood pressure. Within the next few days, his state improved, followed by discharge from ICU. Eventually, the patient agreed to transition from PD to in-center HD. At the time, he was qualified for kidney transplantation, waiting for a compatible donation. CKD and dialysis are factors that significantly affect a patient's quality of life, especially in young patients with congenital diseases like FHHNC. CONCLUSIONS: For the aforementioned reasons, appropriate education and psychological support should be ensured to avoid the harmful effects of therapy non-compliance. Graphical Abstract: https://www.europeanreview.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/Graphical-abstract-1.pdf.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pheochromocytoma is a rare cause of hypertensive emergency. The objective of this analysis was to compare the clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted with hypertensive emergencies with and without co-existing pheochromocytoma. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database from 2016 to 2020 was conducted, encompassing 640,395 patients hospitalized for hypertensive emergencies, including 2535 patients diagnosed with pheochromocytoma. We compared demographics, comorbidities, in-hospital outcomes and resource utilization metrics in patients with and without pheochromocytoma. Propensity-score matching was utilized to account for potential confounders and risk of complications was compared. RESULTS: Among the pheochromocytoma cohort (51.9% female), a significant portion (35.7%) were under 50 years of age, with the majority being Caucasian (47.9%). Comorbid conditions such as obesity, diabetes, and smoking were prevalent, with notable differences in cancer (7.5% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.001) and peripheral vascular disease (17% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001) rates compared to the non-pheochromocytoma cohort. Pheochromocytoma patients had a longer hospital stay (7.5 vs. 6 days, p = 0.002) and higher odds of acute kidney injury (AKI) (1.54, 1.18-2, p=0.001) but lower odds of requiring hemodialysis (0.52, 0.32-0.79, p < 0.001) or experiencing major cardiovascular events (0.5, 0.36-0.69, p < 0.001). No significant difference in inflation-adjusted hospitalization costs was found between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with hypertensive emergencies and pheochromocytoma had a higher incidence of AK, certain comorbidities (cancer, peripheral vascular disease), and more complex hospital courses suggested by longer length of stay. However, the overall cost of hospitalization did not significantly differ between the two cohorts.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic hypertension is an established long-term risk factor for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). However, little is known about short-term MACE risk after hypertensive urgency, defined as an episode of acute severe hypertension without evidence of target-organ damage. We sought to evaluate the short-term risk of MACE after an emergency department (ED) visit for hypertensive urgency resulting in discharge to home. METHODS: We performed a case-crossover study using deidentified administrative claims data. Our case periods were 1-week intervals from 0 to 12 weeks before hospitalization for MACE. We compared ED visits for hypertensive urgency during these case periods versus equivalent control periods 1 year earlier. Hypertensive urgency and MACE components were all ascertained using previously validated International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision Clinical Modification codes. We used McNemar test for matched data to calculate risk ratios. RESULTS: Among 2 225 722 patients with MACE, 1 893 401 (85.1%) had a prior diagnosis of hypertension. There were 4644 (0.2%) patients who had at least 1 ED visit for hypertensive urgency during the 12 weeks preceding their MACE hospitalization. An ED visit for hypertensive urgency was significantly more common in the first week before MACE compared with the same chronological week 1 year earlier (risk ratio, 3.5 [95% CI, 2.9-4.2]). The association between hypertensive urgency and MACE decreased in magnitude with increasing temporal distance from MACE and was no longer significant by 11 weeks before MACE (risk ratio, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.99-1.6]). CONCLUSIONS: ED visits for hypertensive urgency were associated with a substantially increased short-term risk of subsequent MACE.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension remains a significant concern in public healthcare systems, including daily practices of emergency departments (ED). AIM: We aimed to characterize patients admitted to an ED for elevated blood pressure (BP) and to identify factors leading to hospitalization. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all patients admitted to an ED in a tertiary hospital in 2022 due to an acute BP rise without hypertensive emergencies. RESULTS: The studied group (n = 570) constituted 1.5% of all ED admissions in 2022. The median age was 67 years (Q1-Q3) (52-75), 68.9% were females. Systolic BP (200 mm Hg [180-212]) and diastolic BP (105 mm Hg [100-115]) at home were higher than during triage (173 mm Hg [160-190] and 95 mm Hg [84-103], respectively [P <0.0001]). Thirty-nine percent of the studied population had taken BP-lowering agents before ED admission (captopril in 91.8% of cases). In the ED, nitrendipine (54.2%), captopril (38.1%), furosemide (16.3%), urapidil (10.0%), and nitroglycerine (1.9%) were administered. Eventually, a median of 140/82 mm Hg BP was reached in the median time of 288 minutes (202-400). Hospitalization was necessary in 5.4% of patients. The need for furosemide or urapidil administration in the ED doubled the risk of hospitalization (OR, 2.0; P <0.01). Before ED admission, only 17.0% of patients received guidelines-recommended single-pill combination therapy, and 17.6% had already visited ED for uncontrolled hypertension (median of 388 days earlier). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated BP is a common reason for admission to the ED. Crucially, improvements in long-term hypertension treatment and education are needed to reduce the number of patients seeking ED care for elevated BP.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) family plays a central role in the human immune system. Heterozygous variants in NFKB2 typically cause immunodeficiency with various degrees of central adrenal insufficiency, autoimmunity, and ectodermal dysplasia. No reported case has presented kidney failure as an initial symptom. Moreover, documentation of kidney involvement of this disease is limited. CASE DIAGNOSIS: A 2-year-old female who presented with dyspnea and hypertensive emergency in the setting of new-onset nephrotic syndrome with acute-on chronic kidney injury with resultant chronic kidney disease (CKD) was found to have a novel heterozygous N-terminal variant in NFKB2 (c.880del: p. Tyr294Ilefs*4) with mild hypogammaglobulinemia, but no adrenal insufficiency or ectodermal dysplasia. She became dialysis-dependent during her initial hospitalization and developed CKD stage 5D, requiring continued peritoneal dialysis. She is currently awaiting kidney transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Whether nephrotic syndrome or kidney injury or failure is the primary symptom of this variant or secondary to some event remains unknown. Further case accumulation is warranted.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Bladder paragangliomas (bPGLs) account for only 0.06% of all bladder tumours, most commonly presenting with post-micturition syncope and hypertensive crisis. Silent paragangliomas are very rare, and failure to recognise them in the perioperative setting can precipitate a hypertensive crisis in the absence of sufficient alpha-blockade. Here, we describe a case of unrecognised bPGL in a woman with pre-existing hypertension and a single prior episode of haematuria thought to be related to urothelial carcinoma. She was found to have a low-grade non-invasive papillary urothelial carcinoma (potentially the cause of her haematuria) and an unrelated vascular-appearing tumour causing hypertensive crisis and broad complex tachycardia on resection. This was confirmed to be a bPGL on histology for which she underwent definitive management with a partial cystectomy following blood pressure management.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Headaches attributed to disorders of homeostasis include those different headache types associated with metabolic and systemic diseases. These are headache disorders occurring in temporal relation to a disorder of homeostasis including hypoxia, high altitude, airplane travel, diving, sleep apnea, dialysis, autonomic dysreflexia, hypothyroidism, fasting, cardiac cephalalgia, hypertension and other hypertensive disorders like pheochromocytoma, hypertensive crisis, and encephalopathy, as well as preeclampsia or eclampsia. The proposed mechanism behind the causation of these headache subtypes including diagnostic criteria, evaluation, treatment, and overall management will be discussed.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This report presents a case of cannabinoid-induced hyperemesis syndrome causing repeated violent retching in a patient with a large (8 cm) adrenal pheochromocytoma resulting in hypertensive urgency. CASE PRESENTATION: A 69-year-old white male patient with a previously diagnosed pheochromocytoma presented to the emergency department with nausea and vomiting and was found to have hypertensive urgency. Computed tomography scan did not show any acute abdominal pathology and history was inconsistent with a gastrointestinal etiology. Patient had a history of daily cannabinoid use for many years and repeated self-limited hyperemesis episodes, and thus a diagnosis of cannabinoid-induced hyperemesis syndrome was made. It was concluded that the likely explanation for the hypertensive urgency was from physical compression of his adrenal tumor during the episodes of retching resulting in a catecholamine surge. The patient was given antiemetics and admitted to the intensive care unit for blood pressure management. Blood pressure was initially controlled with phentolamine and a clevidipine infusion, then transitioned to oral doxazosin and phenoxybenzamine. Hyperemesis and abdominal pain resolved after 24 hours, and his blood pressure returned to baseline. The patient was discharged with the recommendation to stop all cannabis use. On follow-up, his blood pressure remained well controlled, and he subsequently underwent adrenalectomy for tumor removal. CONCLUSION: Hyperemesis can cause hypertensive events in patients with pheochromocytoma by increasing abdominal pressure, leading to catecholamine release.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

We present the case of a patient with a history of renal-vascular hypertension treated with stent one year previously, who attended the emergency room due to hypertensive emergency and dyspnea. Once the first suspicion of renal artery restenosis was ruled out with CT angiography, the study was completed, confirming the diagnosis of lung cancer through imaging and pathological anatomy. In the hormonal study, elevation of ACTH, hypercortisolism and analytical data of hyperaldosteronism were detected. With the final diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome secondary to ectopic production of ACTH, medical treatment was started, without being able to receive anything else due to the death of the patient after a few days.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab is a beneficial therapy in several advanced cancer types. Predictive biomarkers to better understand which patients are destined to benefit or experience toxicity are needed. Associations between bevacizumab induced hypertension and survival have been reported but with conflicting conclusions. METHODS: We performed post-hoc analyses to evaluate the association in 3124 patients from two phase III adjuvant breast cancer trials, E5103 and BEATRICE. Differences in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with hypertension and those without were compared. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 160 mmHg (n = 346) and SBP ≥ 180 mmHg (hypertensive crisis) (n = 69). Genomic analyses were performed to evaluate germline genetic predictors for the hypertensive crisis. RESULTS: Hypertensive crisis was significantly associated with superior IDFS (p = 0.015) and OS (p = 0.042), but only IDFS (p = 0.029; HR = 0.28) remained significant after correction for prognostic factors. SBP ≥ 160 mmHg was not associated with either IDFS or OS. A common single-nucleotide polymorphism, rs6486785, was significantly associated with hypertensive crisis (p = 8.4 × 10-9; OR = 5.2). CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab-induced hypertensive crisis is associated with superior outcomes and rs6486785 predicted an increased risk of this key toxicity.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Atropine, a competitive antagonist of acetylcholine muscarinic receptors, is commonly used to treat severe bradycardia by blocking parasympathetic activity. We present a rare case of hypertensive emergency following atropine administration, with only one previous report in the literature. A 78-year-old woman with essential hypertension and hypercholesterolemia was admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit for non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. During coronary angiography, an occlusion of the right coronary artery was identified. While removing the diagnostic catheter through the right radial artery, the patient experienced intense pain and discomfort, accompanied by a vasovagal reflex characterized by bradycardia and hypotension. Intravenous atropine (0.5mg) was administered, leading to a rapid rise in heart rate with frequent ventricular ectopy. Subsequently, a progressive and exaggerated elevation in arterial blood pressure occurred, peaking at 294/121mmHg approximately 10min after atropine administration. The patient developed hypertensive acute pulmonary edema, successfully treated with intravenous nitroglycerine (10mg) and furosemide (60mg). Blood pressure normalized after approximately 14min. The exact mechanism of atropine-induced hypertensive emergency remains unknown. While hypertensive emergencies with atropine are exceedingly rare, healthcare professionals should be aware of this potential effect and be prepared for prompt intervention.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

There are few studies focused on the epidemiology of hypertensive crisis at the population level in resource-constrained settings. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and trends over time of hypertensive crisis, as well as the factors associated with this condition among adults. A secondary data analysis was carried out using the Peruvian Demographic and Family Health Survey (ENDES). Hypertensive crisis was defined based on the presence of systolic (≥ 180mmHg) or diastolic (≥ 110mmHg) blood pressure, regardless of previous diagnosis or medication use. The factors associated with our outcome were evaluated using multinomial logistic regression, and the trend of hypertensive crisis was evaluated using the Cochrane-Armitage test. Data from 260,167 participants were analyzed, with a mean age of 44.2 (SD: 16.9) years and 55.5% were women. Hypertension prevalence was 23% (95%CI: 22.7-23.4) and, among them, 5.7% (95%CI: 5.4-5.9) had hypertensive crisis, with an overall prevalence of 1.5% (95%CI: 1.4-1.6). From 2014 to 2022, a significant decrease in the prevalence of hypertensive crisis was observed, from 1.7% in 2014 to 1.4% in 2022 (p = 0.001). In the multivariable model, males, increasing age, living in urban areas, high body mass index, and self-reported type 2 diabetes were positively associated with hypertensive crisis, whereas higher educational level, socioeconomic status, and high altitude were inversely associated. There is a need to improve strategies for the diagnosis, treatment, and control of hypertension, especially hypertensive crisis.

Asunto(s)