RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report and rank orthodontic finishing errors recorded in the clinical phase of the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (BBO) examination and correlate pretreatment case complexity with orthodontic treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center cross-sectional survey collected retrospective data from the clinical phase of BBO examinations between 2016 and 2023. The quality of orthodontic clinical outcomes of each case was assessed by means of the Cast-Radiograph Evaluation (CRE), while case complexity was evaluated using the Discrepancy Index (DI), both tools provided by the American Board of Orthodontics. Survey items were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and a correlation analysis between total CRE and DI scores (p<0.05) was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 447 orthodontic records was included. Orthodontic finishing errors were often observed, and no case was completely perfect. In the total CRE score, an average of 15 points was discounted for each case. Most frequently found issues involved problems with alignment, buccolingual inclination, marginal ridge, and occlusal relationship. The median DI score for initial case complexity was 22.0 (range 10.0 - 67.0). There was no significant correlation between the DI and CRE scores (p=0.106). CONCLUSION: Orthodontic finishing errors are inevitable, even in well-finished board-approved cases. Rotation, excessive buccolingual inclination, and discrepancies in marginal ridges are the most frequently observed areas of concern, in that order. Moreover, while case complexity, determined by DI, can impact orthodontic planning and pose challenges for clinicians, the study did not consider it a determining factor in predicting treatment outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Unlike most health care sectors, patients can select an aesthetic surgery provider without considering insurance coverage. Patients therefore must be able to make informed choices regarding provider selection. Surgeon qualifications are part of the data patients evaluate in their decision making. To characterize the provider landscape that patients face, this study compares the certification requirements of various boards within the aesthetic marketplace. METHODS: Four boards were identified for analysis based on a Google search of "board of plastic surgery": the American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS), the American Board of Cosmetic Surgery (ABCS), the American Board of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ABFPRS), and the American Board of Facial Cosmetic Surgery (ABFCS). Information on certification requirements was obtained from each board's official website. RESULTS: ABPS requires that diplomates complete an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited plastic surgery residency, pass a written and oral examination that includes a case collection, and meet continual standards to maintain certification. ABCS and ABFCS both require an American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery (AACS) cosmetic surgery fellowship and passage of a written and oral examination. Neither board has case collection or continuing certification requirements. ABFPRS requires completion of either an ACGME-accredited otolaryngology or plastic surgery residency. Its examination process includes written and oral components as well as a case log. ABFPRS has enacted continuing certification requirements for diplomates credentialed in 2001 and later. ABPS is the only board that is a member of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS). CONCLUSIONS: ABPS stands apart as the only board within the aesthetic marketplace with rigorous standards for precertification training, demonstrating competency through examinations and case logs, and maintaining certification. Being an ABMS member board also contributes to ABPS being the preeminent organization for identifying physicians who practice safe, effective aesthetic surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This article examines the development of urology as an independent medical discipline in Germany, with a particular focus on professionalization and specialization in the 19th and 20th centuries. Based on historical sources, the text illuminates the importance of the German medical profession's further training regulations as an instrument of medical self-administration and the classification of urology as a medical specialty in the Bremen guidelines of 1924, which established board certification in diseases of the urinary organs (urology).

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: The application of artificial intelligence and large language models in the medical field requires an evaluation of their accuracy in providing medical information. This study aimed to assess the performance of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) models 3.5 and 4 in solving orthopedic board-style questions. Methods: A total of 160 text-only questions from the Orthopedic Surgery Department at Seoul National University Hospital, conforming to the format of the Korean Orthopedic Association board certification examinations, were input into the ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 programs. The questions were divided into 11 subcategories. The accuracy rates of the initial answers provided by Chat GPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 were analyzed. In addition, inconsistency rates of answers were evaluated by regenerating the responses. Results: ChatGPT 3.5 answered 37.5% of the questions correctly, while ChatGPT 4 showed an accuracy rate of 60.0% (p < 0.001). ChatGPT 4 demonstrated superior performance across most subcategories, except for the tumor-related questions. The rates of inconsistency in answers were 47.5% for ChatGPT 3.5 and 9.4% for ChatGPT 4. Conclusions: ChatGPT 4 showed the ability to pass orthopedic board-style examinations, outperforming ChatGPT 3.5 in accuracy rate. However, inconsistencies in response generation and instances of incorrect answers with misleading explanations require caution when applying ChatGPT in clinical settings or for educational purposes.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) with respect to standardized urology multiple-choice items in the United States. METHODS: In total, 700 multiple-choice urology board exam-style items were submitted to GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, and responses were recorded. Items were categorized based on topic and question complexity (recall, interpretation, and problem-solving). The accuracy of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 was compared across item types in February 2024. RESULTS: GPT-4 answered 44.4% of items correctly compared to 30.9% for GPT-3.5 (P>0.0001). GPT-4 (vs. GPT-3.5) had higher accuracy with urologic oncology (43.8% vs. 33.9%, P=0.03), sexual medicine (44.3% vs. 27.8%, P=0.046), and pediatric urology (47.1% vs. 27.1%, P=0.012) items. Endourology (38.0% vs. 25.7%, P=0.15), reconstruction and trauma (29.0% vs. 21.0%, P=0.41), and neurourology (49.0% vs. 33.3%, P=0.11) items did not show significant differences in performance across versions. GPT-4 also outperformed GPT-3.5 with respect to recall (45.9% vs. 27.4%, P<0.00001), interpretation (45.6% vs. 31.5%, P=0.0005), and problem-solving (41.8% vs. 34.5%, P=0.56) type items. This difference was not significant for the higher-complexity items. Conclusion: s: ChatGPT performs relatively poorly on standardized multiple-choice urology board exam-style items, with GPT-4 outperforming GPT-3.5. The accuracy was below the proposed minimum passing standards for the American Board of Urology's Continuing Urologic Certification knowledge reinforcement activity (60%). As artificial intelligence progresses in complexity, ChatGPT may become more capable and accurate with respect to board examination items. For now, its responses should be scrutinized.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: American Board of Surgery (ABS) In-Training Examination (ITE), or ABSITE, preparation requires an effective study approach. In 2014, the ABS announced the alignment of ABSITE to the SCORE® Curriculum. We hypothesized that implementing a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach would help surgery residents improve their performance on the ABSITE. METHOD: Over 20 years, in a single institution, residents' ABSITE performance was evaluated over 3 timeframes: Time A (2004-2013), no specific curriculum; Time B (2014-2019), an annual comprehensive ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based multiple-choice exam (MCQ) was administered; and Time C (2020-2023), like Time B with the addition of the PDSA approach for those with less than 60% correct on the ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam. At the beginning of the academic year, in July, all residents are encouraged to (1) initiate a study plan for the upcoming ABSITE using SCORE® guided by the published ABSITE outlines content topics (Plan), (2) take an ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam in October (Do), (3) assess the results/scores (Study), and (4) identify appropriate next steps (Act). Correlational analysis was performed to evaluate the association between ABSITE scores and ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam scores in Time B and Time C. The primary outcome was the change in the proportions of ABSITE scores <30th percentile. RESULTS: A total of 294 ABSITE scores of 94 residents (34 females and 60 males) were analyzed. We found stronger correlation between the correct percentage on ABSITE and ABSITE-simulated SCORE®-based exam scores in Time C (r = 0.73, p < 0.0001) compared to Time B (0.62, p < 0.0001). The percentage of residents with ABSITE scores lower than 30th percentile dropped significantly from 14.0% to 3.7% (p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Implementing the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach using the SCORE® curriculum significantly enhances residents' performance on the ABSITE exam. Surgery residents are encouraged to use this approach and to utilize the SCORE-contents outlined by the ABS in their study plan.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The designation of pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) as a board-certified (BC) subspecialty has led to uncertainty about the importance of PHM board certification in hiring pediatric hospitalists and ambiguity in counseling trainees interested in PHM careers about the decision to pursue fellowship. We sought to determine the importance of PHM board eligibility or certification in hiring practices. METHODS: We conducted an online, cross-sectional, survey-based study of individuals who self-identified as PHM division leadership utilizing the PHM Division Director Listserv and participant recruitment at a national meeting. RESULTS: A total of 86 responses were received. A total of 64% (30/47) of university-setting hospitals, 77% (17/28) of community hospitals, and 100% (11/11) of combined settings reported that they will hire applicants who are not board-eligible (BE) or BC (P = .83). Of the hospitals who will be hiring non-BE hospitalists, 50% of university settings, 77% of community settings, and 55% of combined settings plan to give equal consideration to both BE and non-BE applicants (P = .21). A total of 57% (21/37) of programs with a PHM fellowship felt that fellowship training was an important or very important consideration in hiring, compared with 27% (13/49) of programs without a PHM fellowship (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Programs with a PHM fellowship were significantly more likely to believe that fellowship training is an important consideration in hiring hospitalists. PHM board certification and fellowship training are perceived as more important by university-based programs, although all settings will consider hiring applicants who are not BC or BE.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the American Board of Anesthesiology transitioned from in-person to virtual administration of its APPLIED Examination, assessing more than 3000 candidates for certification purposes remotely in 2021. Four hundred examiners were involved in delivering and scoring Standardized Oral Examinations (SOEs) and Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs). More than 80% of candidates started their exams on time and stayed connected throughout the exam without any problems. Only 74 (2.5%) SOE and 45 (1.5%) OSCE candidates required rescheduling due to technical difficulties. Of those who experienced "significant issues", concerns with OSCE technical stations (interpretation of monitors and interpretation of echocardiograms) were reported most frequently (6% of candidates). In contrast, 23% of examiners "sometimes" lost connectivity during their multiple exam sessions, on a continuum from minor inconvenience to inability to continue. 84% of SOE candidates and 89% of OSCE candidates described "smooth" interactions with examiners and standardized patients/standardized clinicians, respectively. However, only 71% of SOE candidates and 75% of OSCE candidates considered themselves to be able to demonstrate their knowledge and skills without obstacles. When compared with their in-person experiences, approximately 40% of SOE examiners considered virtual evaluation to be more difficult than in-person evaluation and believed the remote format negatively affected their development as an examiner. The virtual format was considered to be less secure by 56% and 40% of SOE and OSCE examiners, respectively. The retirement of exam materials used virtually due to concern for compromise had implications for subsequent exam development. The return to in-person exams in 2022 was prompted by multiple factors, especially concerns regarding standardization and security. The technology is not yet perfect, especially for testing in-person communication skills and displaying dynamic exam materials. Nevertheless, the American Board of Anesthesiology's experience demonstrated the feasibility of conducting large-scale, high-stakes oral and performance exams in a virtual format and highlighted the adaptability and dedication of candidates, examiners, and administering board staff.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of training background on the frequency and indications of elbow arthroplasty performed by early-career surgeons. METHODS: A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Oral Examination Case List database from 2010 to 2021 was completed. The number of cases performed by surgeons from each individual training background were calculated and compared with the total number of surgeons who completed each fellowship during the study period. RESULTS: Hand surgeons performed the most elbow arthroplasty cases (132, 44%), but a higher percentage of shoulder/elbow surgeons performed elbow arthroplasty in comparison (15% vs. 7%). The mean number of TEA cases performed by shoulder/elbow surgeons was significantly higher than in other subspecialties (P < 0.01). However, when comparing only surgeons who performed elbow arthroplasty during the board collection period, there was no significant difference between training backgrounds (P = 0.20). DISCUSSION: While hand surgeons performed the most elbow arthroplasty cases, a higher percentage of shoulder/elbow surgeons performed elbow arthroplasty during the study period. The high prevalence of distal humerus fracture as an indication for arthroplasty reflected a shift in indications and was not related to training background.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In the transformative era of artificial intelligence, its integration into various spheres, especially healthcare, has been promising. The objective of this study was to analyze the performance of ChatGPT, as open-source Large Language Model (LLM), in its different versions on the recent European Board of Urology (EBU) in-service assessment questions. DESIGN AND SETTING: We asked multiple choice questions of the official EBU test books to ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 for the following exams: exam 1 (2017-2018), exam 2 (2019-2020) and exam 3 (2021-2022). Exams were passed with ≥60% correct answers. RESULTS: ChatGPT-4 provided significantly more correct answers in all exams compared to the prior version 3.5 (exam 1: ChatGPT-3.5 64.3% vs. ChatGPT-4 81.6%; exam 2: 64.5% vs. 80.5%; exam 3: 56% vs. 77%, p < 0.001, respectively). Test exam 3 was the only exam ChatGPT-3.5 did not pass. Within the different subtopics, there were no significant differences of provided correct answers by ChatGPT-3.5. Concerning ChatGPT-4, the percentage in test exam 3 was significantly decreased in the subtopics Incontinence (exam 1: 81.6% vs. exam 3: 53.6%; p = 0.026) and Transplantation (exam 1: 77.8% vs. exam 3: 0%; p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that ChatGPT, especially ChatGPT-4, has the general ability to answer complex medical questions and might pass FEBU exams. Nevertheless, there is still the indispensable need for human validation of LLM answers, especially concerning health care issues.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Our goal was to determine if board certification status was associated with improved postoperative outcomes for certain urologic oncology operations. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 65 and over having radical prostatectomy (RP), radical cystectomy (RC), and radical or partial nephrectomy (RPN) by surgeons with New York State licenses from 2015 to 2021 using the Medicare limited dataset. Our primary exposure was surgeon American Board of Urology certification determined by the New York State Physician Profile. All surgeons were in practice for at least 5 years. Our primary outcomes were 90-day mortality, 30-day unplanned readmission, and hospital length of stay (LOS). We used multivariable linear and logistic regression adjusted for surgeon, hospital, and patient characteristics. We performed the analysis in R, and 2-sided P values < .05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We identified 12,601 patients who had a procedure performed. At the time of the procedure, a minority of procedures (1.3%) were performed by nonboard-certified (NBC) urologists. Among the patient cohort, there were 262 and 1419 mortality and readmission events, respectively; median LOS was 2 days (interquartile range 1155). Patients operated on by NBC urologists tended to have lower-volume surgeons who were less likely to be fellowship trained and to have surgery at smaller hospitals. Patients treated by NBC urologists were more likely to have RP, and less likely to have RC and RPN. On multivariate analysis, board certification was protective against readmission for RP (P < .001) and RC (P = .02), longer LOS for RC (P = .001), and mortality for RPN (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Urology board certification was associated with fewer readmissions after RP and RC, a shorter LOS after RC, and a lower risk of mortality after RPN. Given low event numbers, these findings require validation with a larger dataset.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: A survey conducted by the European Board of Ophthalmology (EBO) revealed significant differences in the surgical training of the ophthalmology residents in Europe, including a disparity between the sexes and a variation in the experience on cataract surgery (CC) between them. This study is about the Spanish sub-cohort of the survey, and its objective is to present and analyse the peculiarities of ophthalmology training in Spain within the European context, as well as discussing ways to harmonise and improve that training throughout the EU. METHODS: We analyse data of the Spanish participants in the EBO exams, defining subgroups by the Autonomous Communities existing in Spain. RESULTS: 93 of 135 requested participants (68.9%) responded. A 60.2% passed the EBO exam between 2021 and 2022, being mostly women (65.59%) aged 31 years old on average. The 91.4% were right-handed, coming from 13 of the 17 Spanish autonomous communities, although mostly from the Community of Valencia, Madrid and Catalonia. Respectively, 16.1%, 3.2% and 8.7% of the respondents said they have completed 10 or more training sessions on animal eyes, synthetic eyes and through the virtual reality simulator. This training was correlated with greater self-confidence in the management of a posterior capsular tear during surgery (p .025). All respondents manifested to have already performed stages of the CC. The average number of operations reported was 181.6 with regional disparities. A significant difference is observed between the sexes against women (-28.3%, p 0.03). DISCUSSION: Ophthalmologists in Spain, much more than other European countries, have greater opportunities for surgical training, with surgical procedures during the residency, that nearly triples those made by the others. Spanish women refer, like their European colleagues, to be in disadvantage in learning opportunities about cataract surgery. The Simulation Based Medical Education (SBME) allows to respond to the training deficit and complements the training on the patient. Although we demonstrate a significant correlation between the number of procedures carried out and self-confidence to operate simple cases, the SBME would be a complementary tool in self-confidence in front of a complication like capsular rupture. CONCLUSION: Spain massively adopts the model named by us "surgery for all", despite the underrepresentation of women in this area, emphasising a need for cultural change that the SBME could facilitate.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus regarding optimal curricula to teach cognitive elements of general surgery. The American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam (ABSITE) aims to measure trainees' progress in attaining this knowledge. Resources like question banks (QBs), Surgical Council on Resident Education (SCORE) curriculum, and didactic conferences have mixed findings related to ABSITE performance and are often evaluated in isolation. This study characterized relationships between multiple learning methods and ABSITE performance to elucidate the relative educational value of learning strategies. METHODS: Use and score of QB, SCORE use, didactic conference attendance, and ABSITE percentile score were collected at an academic general surgery residency program from 2017 to 2022. QB data were available in the years 2017-2018 and 2021-2022 during institutional subscription to the same platform. Given differences in risk of qualifying exam failure, groups of ≤30th and >30th percentile were analyzed. Linear quantile mixed regressions and generalized linear mixed models determined factors associated with ABSITE performance. RESULTS: Linear quantile mixed regressions revealed a relationship between ABSITE performance and QB questions completed (1.5 percentile per 100 questions, P < 0.001) and QB score (1.2 percentile per 1% score, P < 0.001), but not with SCORE use and didactic attendance. Performers >30th percentile had a significantly higher QB score. CONCLUSIONS: Use and score of QB had a significant relationship with ABSITE performance, while SCORE use and didactic attendance did not. Performers >30th percentile completed a median 1094 QB questions annually with a score of 65%. Results emphasize success of QB use as an active learning strategy, while passive learning methods warrant further evaluation.

Asunto(s)