RESUMEN

Background: Locoregional treatment combined with systemic therapy is expected to play a synergistic anticancer role. We conducted this systemic meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib with or without programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (TLP group) compared with TACE + lenvatinib (TL group) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Methods: From the inception date to April 2024, the data from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials. gov were used for meta-analysis. All clinical outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). The hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure the pooled effect. Results: This study included 10 retrospective cohort studies, including 1128 patients. The OS (HR=0.51; 95% CI: 0.43-0.60, P < 0.05), PFS (HR=0.52; 95% CI: 0.45-0.61, P < 0.05), ORR (RR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.37-1.83; P < 0.05) and DCR (RR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.20-1.43; P < 0.05) were significantly higher in TLP group than in the TL group. The incidence of AEs was acceptable. Prognostic factor analysis identified that ECOG PS (1/0), Child-Pugh class (B/A), BCLC stage (C/B) and main portal vein invasion (yes/no) were independent prognostic factors for OS. BCLC stage (C/B) and main portal vein invasion (yes/no) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Conclusion: The TLP group had better efficacy for uHCC than that of the TL group, with acceptable safety. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, identifier (CRD42023420093).

Asunto(s)

Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) plus systemic gemcitabine chemotherapy (GEM-SYS) in combination with lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor for patients with large unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uICC). METHODS: From November 2019 to December 2022, 21 large uICC patients who underwent GEMOX-HAIC (Day 1) and GEM-SYS (Day 8) (3w/cycle) combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor were retrospectively enrolled. Local tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Tumor response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. AEs were evaluated by the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0. RESULTS: After a median follow-up duration of 16.0 months (range 5-43.5 months), 17 patients had died. The median OS was 19.5 months (range 9-43.5 months), and the median PFS was 6.0 months (range 2.5-38.5 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 71.4 %, 42.9 %, and 19.0 %, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 33.3 %, 19.0 %, and 9.5 %, respectively. Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were observed in 0 (0 %), 11 (52.3 %), 5 (23.8 %), and 5 (23.8 %) patients, respectively. The disease control rate and objective response rate were 76.1 % and 52.3 %, respectively. None of the enrolled patients experienced grade 5 AEs. CONCLUSIONS: GEMOX-HAIC plus GEM-SYS in combination with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor was effective and well tolerated for patients with large uICC.

Asunto(s)

Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Desoxicitidina , Gemcitabina , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Humanos , Masculino , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidad , Femenino , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Arteria Hepática , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Organoplatinos

RESUMEN

Recently, in Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) setting, the use of metformin has been associated to a trend toward worse response rate, overall survival and progression free survival in patients who received immunotherapy. The study population included individuals from both Eastern and Western regions with a confirmed diagnosis of HCC and receiving first line treatment with Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or Lenvatinib. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by Cox proportional. For the analysis, patients were stratified based on their use of concomitant medication or not. At the time of database lock, 319 deaths were observed: 209 in the Lenvatinib cohort, 110 in the Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab cohort. In the Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab arm, 50 (16.5%) patients were on chronic metformin use. At the univariate analysis for OS, patients who used metformin showed significantly shorter OS compared to patients who did not use metformin (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients in metformin group had significantly shorter OS compared to patients in no-metformin group (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.1). At the univariate analysis for PFS, patients in metformin group had significantly shorter PFS compared to patients in no-metformin group (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.6). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients in metformin group had significantly shorter PFS compared to patients in no-metformin group (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.7; p = 0.0147). No differences were reported in terms of ORR and DCR between patients in metformin group and those in no-metformin group. In the Lenvatinib cohort, 65 (15%) patients were recorded to chronically use metformin. No statistically significant differences in terms of both OS and PFS were found between patients in metformin group and patients in no-metformin group. This analysis unveils a negative prognostic role associated with metformin use specifically within the Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab group.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Aspirina , Bevacizumab , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Insulina , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Metformina , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Humanos , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años

RESUMEN

AIM: Lenvatinib mesylate (LEN) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat various cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC treatment with LEN is associated with a very high incidence of adverse events. This study was aimed at investigating the incidence of LEN-induced palmar-planter erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES) and its relationship with patient demographics by analyzing clinical laboratory data of LEN-treated patients with HCC. METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective study of patients with HCC who received LEN between April 19, 2018, and September 30, 2020. The observation period was from 1 week before the start of LEN administration to 1 month after the end of administration. RESULTS: Overall, 75 patients with HCC were enrolled. LEN-induced PPES was found in 48.0% (36/75 patients). In these patients, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-Glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP) and monocytes (MONO) were significantly high (ALP: p = 1.32 × 10-3, γ-GTP: p = 4.25 × 10-3 and MONO: p = 0.013). The cut off values of ALP, γ-GTP and MONO for LEN-induced PPES were estimated at 573 U/L, 89 U/L, and 310 counts/µL, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, γ-GTP and MONO were independent risk factors for LEN-induced PPES. CONCLUSIONS: High γ-GTP and high MONO were risk factors for LEN-induced PPES.

Asunto(s)

Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Síndrome Mano-Pie , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Anciano , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Síndrome Mano-Pie/etiología , Síndrome Mano-Pie/epidemiología , gamma-Glutamiltransferasa/sangre , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Fosfatasa Alcalina/sangre , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Monocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto

RESUMEN

Background: Various trials have demonstrated the clinical benefits of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, regardless of mismatch repair (MMR) status or histologic subtype. The majority of the previously published trials had small sample sizes. Here, we aimed to assess the reported efficacy and safety profile of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. Methods: We utilized the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases to identify clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. The outcomes analyzed were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), the objective response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR) and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Subgroup analysis was conducted on the basis of MMR status (deficient, dMMR or proficient, pMMR). Results: Four trials (582 patients) were included. The pooled ORR was 32.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 28.9-36.5]. Subgroup analysis revealed an ORR of 48.1% (95% CI: 26.1-70.2) for dMMR group and 33.1% (95% CI: 25.7-40.6) for pMMR group. The pooled DCR was 74.9% (95% CI: 71.3-78.4%). Subgroup analysis revealed a DCR of 81.0% (95% CI: 64.5-97.6) for the dMMR group and 76.3% (95% CI: 66.3-86.3) for the pMMR group. Follow-up was reported in all included studies. The median range time of PFS and OS was 5.3 months-258 days and 17.2 months-not reached, respectively. Regarding safety, the overall pooled proportions of any-grade AE and AEs ≥ grade 3 were 95.8% (95% CI: 89.5-100.0) and 80.2% (95% CI: 59.9-100.0), respectively. Conclusion: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showed a relevant clinical benefit and significant toxicity in patients with advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. Further studies encompassing long-term outcomes are warranted. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=522160/, identifier CRD42024522160.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Endometriales , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Femenino , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIMS:  At present, there are relatively few reports on the treatment consisting of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib, and there is no unified conclusion on the curative effect. The objective of this research was to assess the efficacy and safety of combining TACE with lenvatinib for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:  This study was a retrospective analysis of the patient's medical records. In this study, 249 patients (uHCC) in our hospital from 2020 to 2021 were divided into 2 groups, including the TACE-alone group (198 patients received TACE alone) and the TACE-LEN group (51 patients were treated with TACE combined with lenvatinib). According to the propensity score matching method, there were TACE-LEN group (51 patients) and TACE-alone group (51 patients). With the help of surgical experts, the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and tumor response (according to mRECIST) of the 2 groups were sorted and recorded, and then analyzed. Survival curves were established, the prognostic factors of OS and PFS were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses, and the independent prognostic factors were recorded. The adverse reactions of patients after treatment were recorded. RESULTS:  The 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 50.98% and 19.48% for the TACE-LEN group, 27.45% and 8.55% for the TACE-alone group (P = .042), respectively. The PFS of patients in the TACE-LEN group was also longer (1-year PFS rate: 25.49% vs. 11.76%, 2-year PFS rate: 19.17% vs. 5.88%; P = .0069). The disease control rate (68.63% vs. 49.10%, P = .044) of the TACE-LEN group was significantly higher. In the subgroup analysis, the OS of the TACE-LEN group was better than TACE-alone group in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C (1-year OS rate: 44.44% vs. 17.14%, 2-year OS rate: 8.67% vs. 0%; P = .009). Factor analysis concluded that serum alkaline phosphatase and treatment protocol (TACE-LEN vs. TACE) were independent influencing factors of OS. The most common treatment-related AEs included decreased albumin (n = 28, 54.9%), hypertension (n = 23, 45.1%), elevated aspartate transaminase (n = 21, 41.2%) and elevated total bilirubin (n = 18, 35.2%) in TACE-LEN group. CONCLUSION:  Compared with TACE monotherapy, TACE combined with lenvatinib effectively prolonged the OS time with a controllable safety profile for patients with uHCC.

Asunto(s)

Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia Combinada , Puntaje de Propensión

RESUMEN

BACKGROUNDS: Programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody has been approved for the first and second-line treatments of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab + regorafenib as a second-line treatment option for advanced HCC. METHODS: Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were the primary endpoints in this clinical trial comprising 28 patients with advanced HCC. The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: According to the mRECIST 1.1 evaluation criteria, the ORR was 28.6%. Complete and partial response were observed in 3 and 5 patients, respectively; stable disease was observed in 12 patients (DCR, 71.4%). The median PFS was 6.4 months. The incidence of grade 1-2 and 3-4 TRAEs was 57.1% and 39.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that tislelizumab + regorafenib can be used as a second-line treatment for advanced HCC.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Piridinas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with regorafenib (hereafter, TACE-regorafenib) or camrelizumab (hereafter, TACE-camrelizumab) for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with untreatable progression after TACE and sorafenib therapy. METHODS: The medical records of patients with HCC who received TACE-regorafenib or TACE-camrelizumab between September 2018 and December 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. Therapeutic response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were enrolled in this study, with 41 and 35 patients in the TACE-regorafenib and TACE-camrelizumab groups, respectively. The objective response rates in the TACE-regorafenib and TACE-camrelizumab groups were 9.8% and 8.6%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.859). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in disease control rates between the two groups (61.0% vs 68.6%, P = 0.838). The median OS was 11 months in the TACE-regorafenib group and 10 months in the TACE-camrelizumab group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.348). The TACE-regorafenib group had a median PFS of 7 months, which was significantly longer than that of the TACE-camrelizumab group (4 months, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the two groups (P = 0.544). CONCLUSIONS: TACE-regorafenib was safe, well-tolerated, and showed promising efficacy in patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced HCC, whereas TACE-camrelizumab demonstrated similar survival benefits.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Piridinas , Sorafenib , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Sorafenib/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Anciano , Terapia Combinada , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The combination of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has improved the clinical outcomes of unresectable hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). However, the overall prognosis remains suboptimal. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel combination of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with lenvatinib plus sintilimab in unresectable HCC. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with unresectable HCC were included and divided into two cohorts: RFA combined with lenvatinib plus sintilimab (R-L-S group) and lenvatinib plus sintilimab (L-S group). The primary efficacy endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS). Adverse events were analyzed to assess the safety profiles. RESULTS: The median follow-up periods for the entire cohort were 14.0 months. The R-L-S group (n = 60) had a significantly higher ORR than those with L-S alone (n = 62) (40.0% vs. 20.9%; p = 0.022). Moreover, patients in the R-L-S group had improved median PFS (12 vs. 8 months; p = 0.013) and median overall survival (24 vs. 18 months; p = 0.037), as compared with lenvatinib and sintilimab alone. No significant difference in treatment related adverse event (TRAE) of any grade between the two groups. The most common TRAEs of grade ≥ 3 were fatigue 10.0% (6/60) and hand-foot skin reaction 10.0% (6/60) in the R-L-S group and hand-foot skin reaction 11.3% (7/62) in the L-S group. CONCLUSION: In unresectable HCC patients, the incorporation of RFA to lenvatinib plus sintilimab demonstrated improved efficacy without compromising safety compared with lenvatinib plus sintilimab alone.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/métodos , Ablación por Radiofrecuencia/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The randomized, dose-optimization, open-label ReDOS study in US patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) showed that, compared with a standard dosing approach, initiating regorafenib at 80 mg/day and escalating to 160 mg/day depending on tolerability increased the proportion of patients reaching their third treatment cycle and reduced the incidence of adverse events without compromising efficacy. Subsequently, the ReDOS dose-escalation strategy was included as an alternative regorafenib dosing option in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines. A retrospective analysis was conducted using a US claims database to assess whether inclusion of this dose-escalation strategy in NCCN Guidelines has influenced the use of flexible dosing in routine US clinical practice, and to describe clinical outcomes pre- and post-inclusion in NCCN Guidelines. METHODS: Patients with CRC in the Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database initiating regorafenib for the first time between January 2016 and June 2020 were stratified based on whether they initiated regorafenib pre- or post-inclusion of ReDOS in NCCN Guidelines, and in two groups: flexible dosing (< 160 mg/day; < 84 tablets in the first treatment cycle) and standard dosing (160 mg/day; ≥ 84 tablets in the first treatment cycle). The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients who initiated their third treatment cycle and the mean number of treatment cycles per group. RESULTS: 703 patients initiated regorafenib during the study period, of whom 310 (44%) initiated before and 393 (56%) initiated after inclusion of ReDOS in NCCN Guidelines. After inclusion in the guidelines, the proportion of patients who received flexible dosing increased from 21% (n = 66/310) to 45% (n = 178/393), the proportion who received standard dosing decreased from 79% (n = 244/310) to 55% (n = 215/393), the proportion who initiated their third treatment cycle increased from 36% (n = 113/310) to 46% (n = 179/393), and the mean (standard deviation) number of treatment cycles increased from 2.6 (2.9) to 3.2 (3.1). CONCLUSIONS: Following inclusion of ReDOS in NCCN Guidelines, real-world data suggest that US clinicians have markedly increased use of flexible dosing in clinical practice, potentially maximizing clinical benefits and safety outcomes for patients with metastatic CRC receiving regorafenib.

Asunto(s)

Neoplasias Colorrectales , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Piridinas , Humanos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Adulto

RESUMEN

Background: Intermediate-stage (BCLC-B) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the up-to-11 criteria represent a significant therapeutic challenge due to high and heterogeneous tumor burden. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with lenvatinib and tislelizumab for these patients. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with unresectable intermediate-stage HCC beyond the up-to-11 criteria were enrolled and divided into TACE monotherapy (T), TACE combined with lenvatinib (TL), or TACE plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab (TLT) group based on the first-line treatment, respectively. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response according to RESIST1.1 and modified RECIST, and adverse events (AEs). Results: There were 38, 45, and 66 patients in the T, TL, and TLT groups, respectively. The TLT group exhibited significantly higher ORR and DCR than the other two groups, as assessed by either mRECIST or RECIST 1.1 (all P<0.05). Median PFS and OS were significantly longer in the TLT group compared with the T group (PFS: 8.5 vs. 4.4 months; OS: 31.5 vs. 18.5 months; all P<0.001) and TL group (PFS: 8.5 vs. 5.5 months; OS: 31.5 vs. 20.5 months; all P<0.05). The incidence of TRAEs was slightly higher in the TLT and TL groups than in the T group, while all the toxicities were tolerable. No treatment-related death occurred in all groups. Conclusions: TACE combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab significantly improved the survival benefit compared with TACE monotherapy and TACE plus lenvatinib in patients with intermediate-stage HCC beyond the up-to-11 criteria, with an acceptable safety profile.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Novel treatments are needed for patients with advanced, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) that progresses or recurs after first-line treatment with chemotherapy. The authors report results from the TNBC cohort of the multicohort, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 LEAP-005 study of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03797326). METHODS: Eligible patients had metastatic or unresectable TNBC with disease progression after one or two lines of therapy. Patients received lenvatinib (20 mg daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks; up to 35 cycles). The primary end points were the objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and safety (adverse events graded by the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0). Duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary end points. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled. The objective response rate by investigator assessment was 23% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-41%). Overall, the objective response rate by blinded independent central review (BICR) was 32% (95% CI, 17%-51%); and, in patients who had programmed cell death ligand 1 combined positive scores ≥10 (n = 8) and <10 (n = 22), the objective response rate was 50% (95% CI, 16%-84%) and 27% (95% CI, 11%-50%), respectively. The median duration of response by BICR was 12.1 months (range, from 3.0+ to 37.9+ months). The median progression-free survival by BICR was 5.1 months (95% CI, 1.9-11.8 months) and the median overall survival was 11.4 months (95% CI, 4.1-21.7 months). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 94% of patients (grade 3, 52%; grade 4, 0%). One patient died due to a treatment-related adverse event of subarachnoid hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in patients with previously treated, advanced TNBC.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Humanos , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/patología , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios de Cohortes

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Bone metastases negatively affect prognosis in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We conducted a systematic literature review to identify clinical trial publications including patients with aRCC with and without bone metastases. METHODS: The review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta­Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022355436). MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched (September 2, 2022) to identify publications reporting efficacy and safety outcomes for patients with/without bone metastasis from clinical trials of systemic RCC therapies. Risk of bias was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Of 526 publications screened, 19 were eligible: seven (from five studies) reported phase 3 trials, six reported phase 2 trials, one reported phase 1b/2 trials, and five were pooled analyses. Five publications reported moderate-quality evidence, while 14 were graded as low- or very low-quality evidence, suggesting a high potential for uncertainty. Five studies reported benefits of investigational therapies versus comparators in patients with and without bone metastases; these studies included cabozantinib, nivolumab, cabozantinib plus nivolumab, and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab treatment arms. Data were also available for nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Bone metastases were consistently associated with poor prognosis in patients with aRCC. Preliminary data support the hypothesis that therapies targeting pathways implicated in the development of bone metastases may be beneficial, and warrant further investigation. However, data to support treatment decision-making are lacking. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the need for clinical data to assist in defining the optimal treatment for patients with aRCC and bone metastasis.

Asunto(s)

Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Óseas , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Anilidas/uso terapéutico , Anilidas/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/secundario , Neoplasias Renales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/administración & dosificación

RESUMEN

We previously reported that combined therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) osimertinib and AXL inhibitor ONO-7475 is effective in preventing the survival of drug-tolerant cells in high-AXL-expressing EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Nevertheless, certain residual cells are anticipated to eventually develop acquired resistance to this combination therapy. In this study, we attempted to establish a multidrug combination therapy from the first-line setting to overcome resistance to this combination therapy in high-AXL-expressing EGFR-mutated NSCLC. siRNA screening assay showed that fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) knockdown induced pronounced inhibition of cell viability in the presence of the osimertinib-ONO-7475 combination, which activates FGFR1 by upregulating FGF2 via the c-Myc pathway. Cell-based assays showed that triple therapy with osimertinib, ONO-7475, and the FGFR inhibitor BGJ398 significantly increased apoptosis by increasing expression of proapoptotic factor Bim and reduced cell viability compared with that observed for the osimertinib-ONO-7475 therapy. Xenograft models showed that triple therapy considerably suppressed tumor regrowth. A novel therapeutic strategy of additional initial FGFR1 inhibition may be highly effective in suppressing the emergence of osimertinib- and ONO-7475-resistant cells.

Asunto(s)

Acrilamidas , Compuestos de Anilina , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Tirosina Quinasa del Receptor Axl , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Receptores ErbB , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas , Pirimidinas , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas Receptoras , Receptor Tipo 1 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos , Animales , Femenino , Humanos , Ratones , Acrilamidas/farmacología , Compuestos de Anilina/farmacología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Benzocicloheptenos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores ErbB/genética , Indoles , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Desnudos , Mutación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/farmacología , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Piperazinas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/metabolismo , Pirimidinas/farmacología , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas Receptoras/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Tirosina Quinasas Receptoras/genética , Receptor Tipo 1 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptor Tipo 1 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Receptor Tipo 1 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Triazoles , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto

RESUMEN

In this work, we describe the development of targeted polymeric nanoparticles loaded with lenvatinib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A synthetic brush copolymer (PHEA-g-BIB-pButMA-g-PEG-biotin) was synthesized from α-poly(N-2-hydroxyethyl)-D,L-aspartamide (PHEA) by a three-step reaction involving atom transfer radical polymerisation (ATRP) to graft hydrophobic polybutylmethacrylate pendant groups and further conjugation with biotinylated polyethylene glycol via carbonate ester. Subsequently, lenvatinib-loaded nanoparticles were obtained and characterized demonstrating colloidal size, negative zeta potential, biotin exposure on the surface and the ability to release lenvatinib in a sustained manner. Lenvatinib-loaded nanoparticles were tested in vitro on HCC cells to evaluate their anticancer efficacy compared to free drug. Furthermore, the enhanced in vivo efficacy of lenvatinib-loaded nanoparticles on nude mice HCC xenograft models was demonstrated by evaluating tumor burdens, apoptotic markers and histological scores after administration of lenvatinib-nanoparticles via intraperitoneal or oral route. Finally, in vivo biodistribution studies were performed, demonstrating the ability of the prepared drug delivery systems to significantly accumulate in the solid tumor by active targeting, due to the presence of biotin on the nanoparticle surface.

Asunto(s)

Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Ratones Desnudos , Nanopartículas , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Animales , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/farmacocinética , Compuestos de Fenilurea/química , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Humanos , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/química , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Nanopartículas/química , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/química , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Distribución Tisular , Línea Celular Tumoral , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , Liberación de Fármacos , Ratones , Biotinilación , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Portadores de Fármacos/química , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Polímeros/química

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) improve the treatment of refractory thyroid cancer, including radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR-DTC) and advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma (aMTC). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the efficacy of MKIs in improving survival outcomes and safety. DATA SOURCES: Comprehensive database searches of MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were performed from inception to December 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Three independent authors selected these studies. Randomized controlled trials that compared the use of a MKI to other MKIs or placebo were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Risk of bias was analyzed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. Treatments were grouped into common nodes based on the type of MKI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included objective response rate, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, and adverse events. RESULTS: Cabozantinib 60 mg/day (CAB60) was associated with the highest prolonged PFS in RAIR-DTC patients, followed by lentivatinib 18 or 24 mg/day (LEN18 or LEN24), and apatinib. PFS was also improved in aMTC patients who received CAB 140 mg/day (CAB140), CAB60, or anlotinib. A significantly greater improvement on the performance of OS was seen in CAB60, LEN24, anlotinib, and sorafenib in RAIR-DTC patients, but in aMTC patients there were lack of statistical differences. Compared with the low-dose MKIs, high-dose MKIs such as CAB, LEN, and vandetanib increased the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSION: CAB60, LEN, and apatinib are promising topical MKIs with statistically significant primary outcomes in RAIR-DTC patients, while CAB and anlotinib are effective in prolonging PFS in aMTC patients.

Asunto(s)

Metaanálisis en Red , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Anilidas/uso terapéutico , Anilidas/efectos adversos , Anilidas/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Indoles/efectos adversos , Indoles/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Sorafenib/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino

RESUMEN

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immunotherapy have been proposed for advanced metastatic anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). We report a case of BRAF V600E-mutated ATC in which lenvatinib (L) plus pembrolizumab (P) enabled neoadjuvant treatment. Case presentation: A male patient aged 65 years presented with a rapidly enlarging left latero-cervical mass. Fine needle aspiration was suggestive of ATC. Surgical consultation excluded radical surgery. While awaiting molecular profile analysis and considering the fast evolution of the disease, treatment with L and P was started. L was started at a dose of 14 mg daily, while P was started at the standard regimen (200 mg every 3 weeks). After 1 month, computerized tomography showed a reduction in the mass with almost complete colliquative degeneration, and the carotid artery wall was free from infiltration. Radical surgery was performed. Histology confirmed papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) in the left lobe and ATC with extensive necrosis in the left latero-cervical lymph node metastasis. The margins were free of tumors (R0). A BRAF V600E mutation was present in both PTC and ATC. At the 1-year follow-up, the patient was free of disease. Conclusion: L and P in combination also appeared to be effective as a neoadjuvant treatment for BRAF V600E-mutated ATC. This combination treatment could be used when there is an opportunity for complete resection of the cancer, and as soon as possible. The intermediate dose of 14 mg of L appeared to be well tolerated and effective.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf , Quinolinas , Carcinoma Anaplásico de Tiroides , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Humanos , Masculino , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Carcinoma Anaplásico de Tiroides/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Anaplásico de Tiroides/genética , Carcinoma Anaplásico de Tiroides/patología , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/genética , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Mutación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico

RESUMEN

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: The clinical data of 12 patients with unresectable ICC who received HAIC combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab in the First Affliated Hospital of Soochow University from October 2021 to April 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. HAIC included gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin; this regimen was combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab within 3-7 days after its initial administration. Relevant laboratory examinations were performed before each cycle of HAIC, and enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed every 6-9 weeks. Tumor response to treatment was evaluated using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and treatment-related adverse reactions of patients with ICC were statistically analyzed. Results: The objective response rate to HAIC combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab was 6/12; the disease control rate was 8/12; the median progression-free survival was 11.8 months; and the median overall survival was 14.2 months. Three patients had grade Ⅳ adverse reactions (increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase thrombocytopenia), while three patients had grade Ⅲ adverse reactions (increased total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase). The remaining patients had grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ adverse reactions. There were no serious complications related to interventional surgery. Conclusions: Use of HAIC (gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin) combined with lenvatinib and tislelizumab in the treatment of unresectable ICC may be safe and feasible. Preliminary clinical studies have shown that this combination can improve the survival and prognosis of patients with ICC.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Humanos , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Gemcitabina , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Arteria Hepática , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) during treatment with two multikinase inhibitors, sorafenib and lenvatinib, in a large group of patients with advanced thyroid cancer. Moreover, we looked for possible associations between HFS occurrence and clinical and pathological features. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 239 patients with advanced thyroid cancer: 165 treated with lenvatinib and 74 with sorafenib. Statistical analyses were performed to verify which features could be correlated with HFS development. Results: HFS was observed in 35/74 (47.4%) and in 43/165 (26.7%) patients treated with sorafenib or lenvatinib, respectively. The median latency from the drug beginning and HFS appearance was 27 days for sorafenib and 2.9 months for lenvatinib. G3/G4 toxicity was observed in 16/35 (45.7%) patients treated with sorafenib and only in 3/43 (7%) treated with lenvatinib. Drug dose reduction due to HFS was required in 19/74 (25.7%) and 3/165 (1.8%) patients treated with sorafenib and lenvatinib, respectively. HFS occurrence was significantly associated with a longer duration of therapy in both groups. Conclusion: HFS was a frequent adverse event during both lenvatinib and sorafenib therapy, with a higher frequency and toxicity grade during sorafenib treatment. HFS was the most frequent reason for drug reduction or discontinuation in patient treated with sorafenib. Early diagnosis of HFS is important to allow early intervention, possibly in a multidisciplinary setting, and to avoid treatment discontinuation, which is highly relevant to obtain the maximum effectiveness of systemic therapy.

Asunto(s)

Antineoplásicos , Síndrome Mano-Pie , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Sorafenib , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Humanos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Sorafenib/efectos adversos , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Síndrome Mano-Pie/etiología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Anciano de 80 o más Años

RESUMEN

Aims/Background The combination of lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor has demonstrated significant efficacy in treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Our study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of triple therapy that includes hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitor for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods Patients with a primary diagnosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma between June 2020 and August 2023 were included in this study. Initially, 53 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled. Then, 13 patients were excluded based on the inclusion criteria, resulting in 40 patients included for analysis. Among them, 31 patients received triple therapy, including 16 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer C stage, 12 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-B, and 3 Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-A hepatocellular carcinoma patients. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate, while the secondary endpoints included the conversion resection rate, pathological complete response rate, pathological partial response rate, and treatment-related adverse events. Results The objective response rate was 80.65% at a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range: 12.6-55.8 months). Of the 14 patients (45.2%) who underwent conversion therapy and were eligible for surgery, 7 patients underwent liver resection and the remaining 7 patients underwent liver transplantation. The median interval between the start of triple therapy and surgery was 117 days, ranging from 25 to 215 days. The pathological complete response was observed in six patients (19.4%) and the pathological partial response rate in eight patients (25.8%). All adverse events occurred in 77.4% of the patients. Conclusion In patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, the combination of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitor exhibits favourable efficacy and well tolerability, achieving a desirable pathological complete response rate while maintaining manageable drug toxicity.

Asunto(s)

Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Quinolinas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Arteria Hepática