RESUMEN
Introducción: Las fracturas del seno frontal, representando del 5% al 15% de las lesiones faciales traumáticas. La tomografía computarizada sin contraste es esencial para el diagnóstico. Clasificadas en cinco tipos según su trayectoria, la elección del tratamiento quirúrgico se basa en factores como ubicación, desplazamiento, integridad del tracto de salida del seno frontal y lesiones asociadas. Los objetivos de la intervención quirúrgica incluyen tratar fugas de líquido cefalorraquídeo, proteger estructuras intracraneales y prevenir complicaciones tardías como meningitis y osteomielitis frontal. Descripción del caso clínico: Paciente masculino de 26 años de edad, remitido al Hospital Vicente Corral Moscoso para valoración y manejo de trauma facial. A los 7 días de su ingreso bajo anestesia general balanceada se realizó el procedimiento quirúrgico que consistió en reducción más fijación con malla frontal más cinco tornillos de la fractura de la pared anterior del seno frontal derecho. Conclusiones: Se sugiere un enfoque multidisciplinario con neurocirujano y cirujano maxilofacial para tratar fracturas faciales superiores. El tratamiento actual considera la afectación de la tabla posterior, la permeabilidad del tracto de salida del seno frontal y el desplazamiento de la tabla anterior. Se prioriza el manejo temprano para proteger estructuras intracraneales, restaurar la función del seno frontal y prevenir complicaciones... (AU)
Introdução: Fraturas do seio frontal, representando 5% a 15% das lesões faciais traumáticas. A TC sem contraste é essencial para o diagnóstico. Classificada em cinco tipos de acordo com sua trajetória, a escolha do tratamento cirúrgico baseia-se em fatores como localização, deslocamento, integridade da via de saída do seio frontal e lesões associadas. Os objetivos da intervenção cirúrgica incluem o tratamento de fístulas liquóricas, proteção de estruturas intracranianas e prevenção de complicações tardias, como meningite e osteomielite frontal. Relato de caso clínico: Paciente do sexo masculino, 26 anos, encaminhado ao Hospital Vicente Corral Moscoso para avaliação e manejo de trauma facial. Sete dias após a internação, sob anestesia geral balanceada, foi realizado o procedimento cirúrgico que consistiu na redução mais fixação com tela frontal mais cinco parafusos da fratura da parede anterior do seio frontal direito. Conclusões: Sugere-se uma abordagem multidisciplinar com neurocirurgião e cirurgião maxilofacial para tratar fraturas faciais superiores. O tratamento atual considera o envolvimento da mesa posterior, a patência da via de saída do seio frontal e o deslocamento anterior da mesa. O manejo precoce é priorizado para proteger as estruturas intracranianas, restaurar a função do seio frontal e prevenir complicações... (AU)
Introduction: Fractures of the frontal sinus, representing 5% to 15% of traumatic facial injuries. Non-contrast CT is essential for diagnosis. Classified into five types according to their trajectory, the choice of surgical treatment is based on factors such as location, displacement, integrity of the frontal sinus outflow tract and associated injuries. The goals of surgical intervention include treating cerebrospinal fluid leaks, protecting intracranial structures, and preventing late complications such as meningitis and frontal osteomyelitis. Clinical case report: 26-year-old male patient, referred to the Vicente Corral Moscoso Hospital for evaluation and management of facial trauma. Seven days after admission, under balanced general anesthesia, the surgical procedure was performed, which consisted of reduction plus fixation with frontal mesh plus five screws of the fracture of the anterior wall of the right frontal sinus. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary approach with neurosurgeon and maxillofacial surgeon is suggested to treat upper facial fractures. Current treatment considers posterior table involvement, frontal sinus outflow tract patency, and anterior table displacement. Early management is prioritized to protect intracranial structures, restore frontal sinus function, and prevent complications... (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Seno Frontal , Seno Frontal/lesiones , Cirugía de Cuidados IntensivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Many emergency general surgery (EGS) conditions can be managed operatively or nonoperatively, with outcomes that vary by diagnosis. We hypothesized that operative management would lead to higher in-hospital costs but to cost savings over time. BACKGROUND: EGS conditions account for $28 billion in health care costs in the United States annually. Compared with scheduled surgery, patients who undergo emergency surgery are at increased risk of complications, readmissions, and death, with accompanying costs of care that are up to 50% higher than elective surgery. Our prior work demonstrated that operative management had variable impacts on clinical outcomes depending on the EGS condition. METHODS: This was a nationwide, retrospective study using fee-for-service Medicare claims data. We included patients 65.5 years of age or older with a principal diagnosis for an EGS condition 7/1/2015-6/30/2018. EGS conditions were categorized as: colorectal, general abdominal, hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB), intestinal obstruction, and upper gastrointestinal. We used near-far matching with a preference-based instrumental variable to adjust for confounding and selection bias. Outcomes included Medicare payments for the index hospitalization and at 30, 90, and 180 days. RESULTS: Of 507,677 patients, 30.6% received an operation. For HPB conditions, costs for operative management were initially higher but became equivalent at 90 and 180 days. For all others, operative management was associated with higher inpatient costs, which persisted, though narrowed, over time. Out-of-pocket costs were nearly equivalent for operative and nonoperative management. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with nonoperative management, costs were higher or equivalent for operative management of EGS conditions through 180 days, which could impact decision-making for clinicians, patients, and health systems in situations where clinical outcomes are similar.