RESUMEN
INTRODUÇÃO: O fechamento percutâneo transcateter do apêndice atrial esquerdo surgiu recentemente como uma alternativa segura e eficaz à terapia anticoagulante de longo prazo na prevenção de AVC e na redução dos riscos de sangramento em pacientes com FA não valvular. No entanto, o papel da combinação do fechamento percutâneo transcateter do apêndice atrial esquerdo e ablação por cateter em um único procedimento ainda não está claro. OBJETIVOS: Neste estudo, os autores buscaram comparar a segurança do fechamento percutâneo transcateter do apêndice atrial esquerdo, ablação por cateter e o procedimento combinando-os em pacientes com fibrilação atrial. MÉTODOS: As bases de dados MEDLINE, EMBASE e a Cochrane Central foram revisadas sistematicamente em busca de estudos que relatassem o desfecho de complicações periprocedimentos na ablação por cateter e oclusão do apêndice atrial esquerdo em uma abordagem "one-stop". O procedimento combinado dessas abordagens, o fechamento percutâneo transcateter do apêndice atrial esquerdo e a ablação por cateter isoladamente foram analisados. Foi realizada uma metaanálise em rede bayesiana para estimar os efeitos relativos entre tratamentos utilizando razão de risco (RR) e para classificar cada um de acordo com a "Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve" (SUCRA). RESULTADOS: Identificamos 11 ensaios relevantes representando 3343 participantes. A avaliação dos valores SUCRA indicou que apenas o LAAC (0,84) emergiu como o tratamento mais eficaz para a redução das complicações periprocedimento, seguido por apenas ablação (0,60) e abordagem combinada (0,05). O risco de complicações periprocedimento foi maior para o grupo apenas ablação (RR 0,73; intervalo credível [CrI] 0,45, 1,1) e menor para o grupo LAAC (RR 0,62; CrI 0,35, 1,0) quando comparados ao grupo combinado. Na comparação indireta entre os grupos LAAC apenas e ablação apenas, não houve significância estatística (Odds Ratio [OR] 1,1; CrI 0,27, 4,4; p=0,60). CONCLUSÃO: Nesta metanálise de rede, a abordagem combinada do fechamento percutâneo transcateter do apêndice atrial esquerdo e da ablação por cateter foi associada a um aumento de complicações periprocedimentos quando comparado aos procedimentos isoladamente. Portanto, deve-se avaliar cuidadosamente os benefícios e riscos de realizar esses procedimentos em conjunto, levando em consideração a segurança do paciente.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Apéndice Atrial , Metaanálisis en Red , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo , Accidente Cerebrovascular , HemorragiaAsunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo , Venas Pulmonares , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Ligadura/efectos adversos , Ligadura/métodos , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo/efectos adversos , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Both atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are common cardiovascular diseases. If the two exist together, the risk of stroke, hospitalization for HF and all-cause death is increased. Currently, research on left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in patients with AF and HF is limited and controversial. This study was designed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of LAAC in AF patients with different types of HF. METHODS: Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and HF who underwent LAAC in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University from August 2014 to July 2021 were enrolled. According to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the study divided into HF with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF < 50%, HFrEF) group and HF with preserved ejection fraction (LVEF ≥ 50%, HFpEF) group. The data we collected from patients included: gender, age, comorbid diseases, CHA2DS2-VASc score, HAS-BLED score, NT-proBNP level, residual shunt, cardiac catheterization results, occluder size, postoperative medication regimen, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) results and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) results, etc. Patients were followed up for stroke, bleeding, device related thrombus (DRT), pericardial tamponade, hospitalization for HF, and all-cause death within 2 years after surgery. Statistical methods were used to compare the differences in clinical outcome of LAAC in AF patients with different types of HF. RESULTS: Overall, 288 NVAF patients with HF were enrolled in this study, including 142 males and 146 females. There were 74 patients in the HFrEF group and 214 patients in the HFpEF group. All patients successfully underwent LAAC. The CHA2DS2-VASc score and HAS-BLED score of HFrEF group were lower than those of HFpEF group. A total of 288 LAAC devices were implanted. The average diameter of the occluders was 27.2 ± 3.5 mm in the HFrEF group and 26.8 ± 3.3 mm in the HFpEF group, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.470). Also, there was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of residual shunts between the two groups as detected by TEE after surgery (P = 0.341). LVEF was significantly higher in HFrEF group at 3 days, 3 months and 1 year after operation than before (P < 0.001). At 45-60 days after surgery, we found DRT in 9 patients and there were 4 patients (5.4%) in HFrEF group and 5 patients (2.3%) in HFpEF group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.357). One patient with DRT had stroke. The incidence of stroke was 11.1% in patients with DRT and 0.7% in patients without DRT (P = 0.670). There was one case of postoperative pericardial tamponade, which was improved by pericardiocentesis at 24 h after surgery in the HFpEF group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 1.000). During a mean follow-up period of 49.7 ± 22.4 months, there were no significant differences in the incidence of stroke, bleeding, DRT and HF exacerbation between the two groups. We found a statistical difference in the improvement of HF between HFrEF group and HFpEF group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LAAC is safe and effective in AF patients with different types of HF. The improvement of cardiac function after LAAC is more pronounced in HFrEF group than in HFpEF group.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Función del Atrio Izquierdo , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Apéndice Atrial/fisiopatología , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo/efectos adversos , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Volumen Sistólico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been suggested as an alternative to long-term oral anticoagulation for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, but comparative data remain scarce. We aimed to assess ischemic and bleeding outcomes of LAAC compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the prevention of cardioembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Embase and MEDLINE were searched for randomized trials comparing LAAC, VKAs, and DOACs. The primary efficacy end point was any stroke or systemic embolism. Treatment effects were calculated from a network meta-analysis and ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Seven trials and 73 199 patients were included. The risk of the primary end point was not statistically different between LAAC versus VKAs (odds ratio [OR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.50]) and LAAC versus DOACs (OR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.71-1.73]). LAAC and DOACs resulted in similar risk of major or minor (OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.61-1.42]) and major bleeding (OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.58-1.46]); however, after exclusion of procedural bleeding, bleeding risk was significantly lower in those undergoing LAAC. Both LAAC and DOACs reduced the risk of all-cause death compared with VKAs (LAAC versus VKAs: OR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.53-0.91]; DOACs versus VKAs: OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.85-0.95], respectively). DOACs ranked as the best treatment for stroke or systemic embolism prevention (66.9%) and LAAC for reducing major bleeding (63.9%) and death (96.4%). CONCLUSIONS: As a nonpharmacological alternative to oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, LAAC showed similar efficacy and safety compared with VKAs or DOACs. Prospective confirmation from larger studies is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo , Humanos , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo/efectos adversos , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo/métodos , Metaanálisis en Red , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the aim of reducing the risk of Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) in patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF), Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) devices are emerging as an alternative to oral anticoagulants. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of the LAAO procedure in patients with NVAF and contraindications and/or failure for oral anticoagulants. METHOD: The search for evidence was carried out in the electronic databases Medline and Embase till January 2024. Additional searches were conducted on Google Scholar. The clinical trials registry database was also consulted. Two blinded investigators performed the search, study selection, and data collection, and assessed quality and risk of bias using the Cochrane tool for randomized clinical trials. Meta-analyses of eligible trials were performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. The random effects model was used for all analyses. RESULTS: Five articles were selected, among which three were non-inferiority randomized clinical trials that analyzed the performance and safety of LAAO devices compared to the use of Vitamin K Antagonists (AVKs) or Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs). No randomized clinical trials were found that analyzed populations with absolute contraindications to oral anticoagulants. Having as primary outcomes analyzed the occurrence of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), cardiovascular or unexplained death and systemic embolism, the non-inferiority of the LAAO procedure compared to the use of oral anticoagulants was verified. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with an absolute contraindication to anticoagulation and/or failure to use oral anticoagulants, evidence for the use of LAAO devices is scarce.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Administración Oral , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Contraindicaciones de los Medicamentos , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular IzquierdoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to investigate the incidence, potential risk factors, and clinical outcomes of incomplete device endothelialization (IDE) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing Watchman left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). METHODS: In this study, 68 AF patients who underwent successful implantation of the Watchman device without peri-device leak (PDL) during follow-up were included. The endothelialization status was assessed using Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and LAA computed tomography angiography (CTA) at 6 weeks and 6 months post-implantation. Adverse cerebro-cardiac events were documented at one-year follow-up. Baseline characteristics, including age, device sizes, and clinical indicators, were analyzed as potential predictors for IDE. RESULTS: IDE was observed in 70.6% and 67.6% of patients at 6 weeks and 6 months after implantation, respectively. Higher levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [odds ratio (OR): 15.109, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.637-139.478, p = 0.017 and OR: 11.015, 95% CI: 1.365-88.896, p = 0.024] and lower aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (OR 0.924, 95% CI: 0.865-0.986, p = 0.017 and OR: 0.930, 95% CI: 0.874-0.990, p = 0.023) at baseline were found to be significantly associated with IDE at 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively, although no significant difference in adverse cerebro-cardiac events was noted between incomplete and complete DE groups during 1-year follow-up CONCLUSIONS: IDE is found to be a prevalent occurrence in humans following LAAC. Elevated HDL-C and reduced AST levels are shown to be linked to an increased risk of IDE after LAAC.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Apéndice Atrial/fisiopatología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Incidencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Medición de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular IzquierdoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic treatment (ATT) post-left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains controversial. Furthermore, most of the patients undergoing LAAO are at a very high bleeding risk. AIMS: This study aimed to compare a simplified versus conventional ATT after LAAO in very high bleeding risk patients. METHODS: This is a multicentre, retrospective study including very high bleeding risk patients, according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition, who underwent LAAO. These included patients at >4% risk of BARC 3 to 5 bleeding or >1% risk of intracranial bleeding after the procedure. Two groups were established based on the discharge ATT. The simplified group included single antiplatelet treatment or no treatment, and the conventional group comprised dual antiplatelet treatment or anticoagulation (combined or not with antiplatelet therapy). RESULTS: A total of 1,135 patients were included. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.5±1.5 and 3.7±1.0, respectively. There were no differences in the composite endpoint (death, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, device-related thrombus or major bleeding) between the 2 groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.11; p=0.188). Although the rate of major bleeding during the first year was numerically lower in the simplified group, it did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.41-1.10; p=0.104). Nonetheless, patients with previous major bleeding presented a significantly lower rate of major bleeding when using the simplified treatment (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.36-0.99; p=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with very high bleeding risk, a simplified ATT after LAAO seems to be as effective as conventional protocols. Furthermore, patients with a history of major bleeding experienced a lower risk of major bleeding with the simplified ATT.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Fibrinolíticos , Hemorragia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Medición de Riesgo , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular IzquierdoAsunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/fisiopatología , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular IzquierdoRESUMEN
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke and systemic embolism, and the left atrial appendage (LAA) has been identified as a principal source of thromboembolism in these patients. While oral anticoagulation is the current standard of care, LAA closure (LAAC) emerges as an alternative or complementary treatment approach to reduce the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients with AF. Moderate-sized randomized clinical studies have provided data for the efficacy and safety of catheter-based LAAC, largely compared with vitamin K antagonists. LAA device iterations, advances in pre- and peri-procedural imaging, and implantation techniques continue to increase the efficacy and safety of LAAC. More data about efficacy and safety of LAAC have been collected, and several randomized clinical trials are currently underway to compare LAAC with best medical care (including non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants) in different clinical settings. Surgical LAAC in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery reduced the risk of stroke on background of anticoagulation therapy in the LAAOS III study. In this review, we describe the rapidly evolving field of LAAC and discuss recent clinical data, ongoing studies, open questions, and current limitations of LAAC.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Fibrilación Atrial , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo/instrumentación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) represents an alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). While transoesophageal echocardiography is the current standard for guiding LAAC procedures, several centers have employed fluoroscopic guidance alone. However, data on long-term outcomes are lacking. METHODS: A total of 536 patients with AF undergoing LAAC and with available data on long-term follow-up were included in the retrospective, single-center analysis. Outcomes of patients undergoing fluoroscopy-guided LAAC were compared with those undergoing echocardiography guided LAAC. Time-dependent analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 234 (44%) and 302 (56%) patients were treated with echocardiography and fluoroscopy guidance, respectively. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Procedural success rates were high in both groups (97% of fluoroscopy vs. 98% of echocardiography guided procedures; p = 0.92) and rates of relevant peri-device leaks (p = 0.50) and device-related thrombus formation (p = 0.22) did not differ between groups. Median clinical follow-up time was 48 (IQR 19-73) months. Rates of all-cause mortality (p = 0.15, HR 0.83, CI 0.64-1.07) and stroke (p = 0.076, HR 2.23, CI 0.90-5.54) were comparable among groups. CONCLUSION: LAAC with fluoroscopy guidance alone is equally safe and leads to similar clinical outcome compared to LAAC with additional echocardiography guidance.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo , Radiografía Intervencional , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Apéndice Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Fluoroscopía , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo/efectos adversos , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo/instrumentación , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversosRESUMEN
An 81-year-old patient was referred for left atrial appendage closure. Anatomical LAA analysis by CT scan showed an inverted chicken wing morphology. The procedure was performed through i an infero-anterior transseptal puncture and led to "sandwich" closure strategy using an AMPLATZER AMULET 25 mm device. Despite successful deployment of the occluder, a hemopericardium soon developed related to an iatrogenic LAA perforation/partial rupture and leading to major hemodynamic instability. After pericardocentesis, it was decided to inject activated thrombin into the pericardial sac to achieve in situ hemostasis. This strategy enabled coagulation of the hemopericardium and cessation of active bleeding, without recourse to surgical treatment.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Humanos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Derrame Pericárdico/etiología , Derrame Pericárdico/cirugía , Masculino , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular IzquierdoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Device-related thrombosis (DRT) is a common finding after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and is associated with worse outcomes. As women are underrepresented in clinical studies, further understanding of sex differences in DRT patients is warranted. METHODS AND RESULTS: This sub-analysis from the EUROC-DRT-registry compromises 176 patients with diagnosis of DRT after LAAC. Women, who accounted for 34.7% (61/176) of patients, were older (78.0 ± 6.7 vs. 74.9 ± 9.1 years, p = .06) with lower rates of comorbidities. While DRT was detected significantly later in women (173 ± 267 vs. 127 ± 192 days, p = .01), anticoagulation therapy was escalated similarly, mainly with initiation of novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC), vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or heparin. DRT resolution was achieved in 67.5% (27/40) of women and in 75.0% (54/72) of men (p = .40). In the remaining cases, an intensification/switch of anticoagulation was conducted in 50.% (9/18) of men and in 41.7% (5/12) of women. Final resolution was achieved in 72.5% (29/40) cases in women, and in 81.9% (59/72) cases in men (p = .24). Women were followed-up for a similar time as men (779 ± 520 vs. 908 ± 687 days, p = .51). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in mortality rates in women (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.73, 95%-Confidence interval [95%-CI]: .68-4.37, p = .25) and no differences in stroke (HR: .83, 95%-CI: .30-2.32, p = .72) within 2 years after LAAC. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of risk factors and outcome revealed no differences between men and women, with DRT in women being diagnosed significantly later. Women should be monitored closely to assess for DRT formation/resolution. Treatment strategies appear to be equally effective.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Sistema de Registros , Trombosis , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Anciano , Trombosis/etiología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Factores Sexuales , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/métodos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular IzquierdoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) not suitable for long-term anticoagulant therapy undergo percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) using the WATCHMAN device. The safety and efficacy of WATCHMAN-FLX (WM-FLX) compared with WATCHMAN-2.5 (WM-2.5), particularly in Asian populations, is unknown. METHODS: We evaluated the background, procedure, and clinical outcomes of 199 patients who underwent LAAC between September 2019 and December 2022 and compared WM-2.5 (72 patients) with WM-FLX (127 patients). RESULTS: The mean age was 76 years, with 128 men, and 100 had nonparoxysmal AF (non-PAF). The mean CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED were 5.1, and 3.2 points, respectively. WM-FLX group demonstrated a shorter procedure time than WM-2.5 group (50 vs. 42 min, p = 0.001). The WM-FLX group demonstrated no procedural-related acute cardiac tamponade, which was significantly low (5.6% vs. 0%, p = 0.02), and a significantly higher rate of complete seal at 45-day (63% vs. 80%, p = 0.04). WM-FLX group had a significantly higher cumulative 1-year incidence of device-related thrombosis (DRT) than WM-2.5 group (3.4% vs. 7.0%, Log-rank p = 0.01). Univariate analysis identified two DRT risk factors in the WM-FLX group: non-PAF (odds ratio [OR] 7.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.20-48.7; p = 0.04), and 35-mm device (OR 5.13; 95% CI 1.31-19.8; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: WM-FLX significantly improved the procedural quality and safety of LAAC. However, DRT remains an important issue even in the novel LAAC device, being a hazard for patients with high DRT risk, such as having non-PAF and using 35-mm devices.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo , Trombosis , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Apéndice Atrial/fisiopatología , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Incidencia , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo/efectos adversos , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo/instrumentación , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/prevención & control , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Patients with previous interatrial shunt device (IASD) implantation may face greater challenges during future left atrial interventional procedures. Herein, we report the first case of left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in a patient with previous IASD implantation. The patient successfully underwent LAAC using the LAmbre device without complications.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/fisiopatología , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Masculino , Femenino , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Anciano , Función del Atrio Izquierdo , Foramen Oval Permeable/diagnóstico por imagen , Foramen Oval Permeable/terapia , Foramen Oval Permeable/complicaciones , Foramen Oval Permeable/fisiopatología , Foramen Oval Permeable/cirugía , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular IzquierdoAsunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Apéndice Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular IzquierdoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: A 79-year-old man found to have a pulmonary nodule and pleural effusion on CT went on to have an 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan. The lung abnormality did not show FDG uptake and appeared benign. However, PET/CT detected moderately increased FDG uptake associated with a left atrial appendage closure device inserted 11 months prior to the PET/CT. Infection of a left atrial closure device has previously been demonstrated with FDG PET/CT. This case, in the absence of infection, with normal serum inflammatory markers, highlights that left atrial closure devices, in common with other foreign bodies/devices, may demonstrate significant, incidental FDG uptake.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Humanos , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18/farmacocinética , Anciano , Masculino , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular IzquierdoRESUMEN
The left atrial appendage (LAA) has gained increasing attention in the field of cardiology as a potential site for intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and an elevated risk of thromboembolic events. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy to mitigate the risk of stroke and systemic embolism, especially in individuals who are unsuitable candidates for long-term anticoagulation therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current state of LAAO, encompassing its anatomic considerations, procedural techniques, clinical outcomes, and future directions.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Tromboembolia/etiología , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular IzquierdoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgical left atrial appendage (LAA) closure concomitant to open-heart surgery prevents thromboembolism in high-risk patients. Nevertheless, high-level evidence does not exist for LAA closure performed in patients with any CHA2DS2-VASc score and preoperative atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) status-the current trial attempts to provide such evidence. METHODS: The study is designed as a randomized, open-label, blinded outcome assessor, multicenter trial of adult patients undergoing first-time elective open-heart surgery. Patients with and without AF and any CHA2DS2-VASc score will be enrolled. The primary exclusion criteria are planned LAA closure, planned AF ablation, or ongoing endocarditis. Before randomization, a three-step stratification process will sort patients by site, surgery type, and preoperative or expected oral anticoagulation treatment. Patients will undergo balanced randomization (1:1) to LAA closure on top of the planned cardiac surgery or standard care. Block sizes vary from 8 to 16. Neurologists blinded to randomization will adjudicate the primary outcome of stroke, including transient ischemic attack (TIA). The secondary outcomes include a composite outcome of stroke, including TIA, and silent cerebral infarcts, an outcome of ischemic stroke, including TIA, and a composite outcome of stroke and all-cause mortality. LAA closure is expected to provide a 60% relative risk reduction. In total, 1500 patients will be randomized and followed for 2 years. DISCUSSION: The trial is expected to help form future guidelines within surgical LAA closure. This statistical analysis plan ensures transparency of analyses and limits potential reporting biases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03724318. Registered 26 October 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03724318 . PROTOCOL VERSION: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2023.06.003 .
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/prevención & control , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular Izquierdo , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an effective alternative strategy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk for bleeding with anticoagulation (AC). Efficacy of this strategy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare risk of stroke in HCM-AF patients treated with LAAC with those treated with AC. METHODS: By use of the TriNetX Global Research Network, HCM-AF patients from 2015 to 2024 were assigned to categories of treatment with LAAC and treatment solely with AC and observed for 3 years for ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching was used to limit confounders. RESULTS: Of 14,867 HCM-AF patients identified, 364 (2.5%) were treated with LAAC vs 14,503 (97.5%) treated with AC. HCM LAAC patients were older (72 vs 67 years; P < .001) and had more comorbidities and more prior bleeding events, including higher rate of prior gastrointestinal bleeding (68% vs 18%; P < .001), compared with HCM patients treated solely with AC. After propensity score matching, there was no baseline difference between groups including prior bleeding events (P > .05). During follow-up, HCM patients treated with LAAC had higher rates of ischemic stroke (13% vs 8%; hazard ratio, 1.9; P = .006) and systemic embolism (14% vs 9%; hazard ratio, 1.8; P = .006) but no difference in mortality compared with matched HCM patients receiving AC. CONCLUSION: These real-world data do not support percutaneous LAAC in HCM-AF patients as the primary treatment strategy during long-term AC to reduce stroke risk. However, LAAC may remain a reasonable option for HCM-AF patients who are unable to tolerate AC because of prohibitive bleeding risk.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Masculino , Cardiomiopatía Hipertrófica/complicaciones , Femenino , Anciano , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Puntaje de Propensión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Seguimiento , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Cierre del Apéndice Auricular IzquierdoRESUMEN
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been the preferred imaging modality to help guide left atrial appendage closure. Newer technologies such as the Nuvision 4D Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) catheter allow for real-time 3D imaging of cardiac anatomy. There are no direct comparison studies for procedural imaging between TEE and 4D ICE. To evaluate the performance and safety of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure procedures with the Watchman FLX and Amulet, guided by the Nuvision 4D ICE Catheter. This retrospective observational analysis was conducted on institutional LAAO National Cardiovascular Data Registry from January 2022 to March 2023. Patients had undergone LAA closure procedures with the Watchman FLX or Amulet device guided by TEE or a 4D ICE Catheter. The primary outcome evaluated was successful LAAO device placement. A total of 121 patients underwent LAAO device placement with 46 (38.0%) patients guided by 4D ICE during LAAO implantation. The 4D ICE group had a shorter procedural time compared with TEE guidance. Post procedural 45-day TEE post implant was also comparable for both groups with no patients in either group having incomplete closure of the left atrial appendage and peri-device leak > 5 mm. No device related complications (device related access, stroke, or pericardial effusion) occurred in either group at follow-up. There was no significant difference in device implant success or post procedural outcomes at 45 days in either the TEE or 4D ICE group. However, there was a noticeable improvement in procedural time with the 4D ICE catheter.