RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Axillary vein/subclavian vein (AxV/SCV) and Internal jugular vein (IJV) are commonly used for implantable venous access port (IVAP) implantation in breast cancer patients for chemotherapy. Previous research focused on comparison of complications while patient comfort was ignored. This study aims to compare patient comfort, surgery duration and complications of IVAP implantation between IJV and AxV/SCV approaches. METHODS: Two hundred forty-eight breast cancer patients were enrolled in this randomized controlled study from August 2020 to June 2021. Patients scheduled to undergo IVAP implantation were randomly and equally assigned to receive central venous catheters with either AxV /SCV or IJV approaches. All patients received comfort assessment using a comfort scale table at day 1, day 2 and day 7 after implantation. Patient comfort, procedure time of operation as well as early complications were compared. RESULTS: Patient comfort was significantly better in the AxV/SCV group than that of IJV group in day 1 (P < 0.001), day 2 (P < 0.001) and day 7(P = 0.023). Procedure duration in AxV/SCV group was slightly but significantly shorter than IJV group (27.14 ± 3.29 mins vs 28.92 ± 2.54 mins, P < 0.001). More early complications occurred in AxV/SCV group than IJV group (11/124 vs 2/124, P = 0.019). No difference of complications of artery puncture, pneumothorax or subcutaneous hematoma between these two groups but significantly more catheter misplacement in AxV/SCV group than IJV group (6/124 vs 0/124, P = 0.029). Absolutely total risk of complications was rather low in both groups (8.87% in AxV/SCV group and 1.61% in IJV group). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that patients with AxV/SCV puncture have higher comfort levels than IJV puncture. AxV/SCV puncture has shorter procedure duration but higher risk of early complications, especially catheter misplacement. Both these two approaches have rather low risk of complications. Consequently, our study provides an alternative choice for breast cancer patients to reach better comfort.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Punciones/psicología , Adulto , Axila/irrigación sanguínea , Vena Axilar , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Venas Yugulares , Persona de Mediana Edad , Punciones/efectos adversos , Punciones/métodos , Vena Subclavia , Factores de Tiempo , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vascular access devices (VADs) are essential for delivery of intravenous therapies. There are notable gaps in the literature regarding a focus on patient experience and meaning-making related to living with a VAD, specifically a central venous access device (CVAD). AIMS: To explore how patients make sense of living with a CVAD. METHODS: This study followed an interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) approach. Purposive sampling was used to identify 11 cancer patients who had a CVAD in situ. One-to-one semi-structured interviews were performed. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed by the lead author. FINDINGS: Four superordinate themes were identified: the self under attack; being rescued/being robbed; protection of others/protection of self; bewilderment and dismay at lack of staff competence. CONCLUSION: Having a CVAD affects the psychological, social, and personal self and impacts on self-esteem and self-image. Despite this, CVADs are accepted by patients and are eventually 'embodied' by them.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Neoplasias , Adaptación Psicológica , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , AutoimagenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of passive music therapy on anxiety and vital signs among lung cancer patients at their first peripherally inserted central catheter placement procedure in China. METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in the cancer center of a hospital in Chengdu from May to December 2017. A total of 304 lung cancer patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited and randomly assigned to experimental (n = 152) and control (n = 152) group, respectively. The control group only received standard care, while the experimental group received standard care and passive music therapy during peripherally inserted central catheter placement (30-45 min) and after catheterization, until discharged from the hospital (twice a day, 30 min once). Measures include anxiety and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate). RESULTS: Repetitive measurement and analysis of variance showed that the patients in experimental group had a statistically significant decrease in anxiety, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate over time compared to the control group, but no significant difference was identified in systolic blood pressure and respiratory rate. CONCLUSION: Passive music therapy can efficiently relieve the anxiety of lung cancer patients during peripherally inserted central catheter placement. It also can lower the patient's diastolic blood pressure and slow down the heart rate. So, music therapy benefits patients with peripherally inserted central catheter.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Musicoterapia , Anciano , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/psicología , China , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Signos VitalesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: A well-functioning vascular access is crucial for hemodialysis treatment, and arteriovenous fistula is the recommended vascular access type. Arteriovenous fistula is superior to other vascular access types in many aspects, but the effect of arteriovenous fistula on patients' psychiatric state is not well described yet. The aim of this study is to determine whether there is an association between vascular access type and depression scores. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at two hemodialysis centers. Geriatric Depression Scale-15 was administered to geriatric hemodialysis patients, using ≥5 score as the cut-off value for the presence of depressive symptoms. Descriptive tests, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Pearson's Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman's rank correlation calculation, and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed accordingly to analyze the data. RESULTS: Of 75 participants, 34 (45.3%) were female and the mean age was 73.4 ± 5.9 years (range: 65-92). The prevalence of depressive symptoms in the geriatric hemodialysis population was 53.3%. Central venous catheter, hypertension, and increased time on hemodialysis have been found to be risk factors for higher depression scores (aOR 10.505 (95% CI 1.435-76.900), p = 0.021; aOR 9.783 (95% CI 2.508-38.169), p = 0.001; aOR 1.019 (95% CI 1.003-1.035), p = 0.017, respectively). Among patients with arteriovenous fistula, those with hypertension had higher depression scores (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric hemodialysis patients were found to have depressive symptoms commonly, and central venous catheter, hypertension, and increased time on hemodialysis have been found to be risk factors for presence of depressive symptoms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study highlighting that arteriovenous fistula is associated with lower depression scores and lower prevalence of depressive symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Afecto , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Depresión/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/psicología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Masculino , Salud Mental , Prevalencia , Diálisis Renal/psicología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Turquía/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Three types of central venous access devices (CVADs) are routinely used in the delivery of intravenous systemic anticancer therapy (SACT): peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), subcutaneously tunnelled central catheters (Hickman-type devices) and totally implantable chest wall ports (Ports). This qualitative study, nested within a multicentre, randomised controlled trial, sought to explore patient acceptability and experiences of the three devices. DESIGN: Eight focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. SETTING: Six outpatient cancer treatment centres in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-two patients (20 female, mean age 61.7 years) who had taken part or were taking part in the broader trial. INTERVENTION: As part of the larger, randomised controlled trial, participants had been randomly assigned one of three CVADs for the administration of SACT. RESULTS: Attitudes towards all three devices were positive, with patients viewing their CVAD as part of their treatment and recovery. Participants with PICCs and Hickmans tended to compare their device favourably with peripheral cannulation. By comparison, participants with Ports consistently compared their device with PICCs and Hickmans, emphasising the perceived superiority of Ports. Ports were perceived to offer unique psychological benefits, including a greater sense of freedom and less intrusion in the context of personal relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Patient experiences and preferences have not been systematically used to inform policy and practice regarding CVAD availability and selection. Our research identified patterns of patient device preferences that favoured Ports, although this was not universal. Results of this study could improve support for patients and offer greater scope for incorporating patient perspectives into decision-making processes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN44504648.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Bombas de Infusión Implantables/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Bombas de Infusión Implantables/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/psicología , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa , Calidad de Vida , Autocuidado/psicología , Grabación en VideoRESUMEN
PURPOSE:: This study aimed to investigate the success of first-time phlebotomy and the affecting factors in children between 4 and 10 years of age. METHODS:: This descriptive, comparative, and cross-sectional study was conducted on 155 children who underwent phlebotomy. The Sociodemographic Data Form, the Children's Anxiety Meter-State, the Children's Fear Scale, and the Difficult Intravenous Access score were used to collect the data for the study. The relationship between the success of first-time phlebotomy, mean pre-phlebotomy fear and anxiety score, and Difficult Intravenous Access score were examined. The variables affecting the success of first-time phlebotomy were assessed by regression analysis. RESULTS:: Phlebotomies failed in 18.1% of children. A statistically significant relationship was found between the success of first-time phlebotomy, Children's Anxiety Meter-State, Children's Fear Scale mean scores assessed by the researchers, and Difficult Intravenous Access score. Factors affecting the success of first-time phlebotomy include difficult vascular access, age, mean Children's Anxiety Meter-State score, mean Difficult Intravenous Access score, and duration of the last phlebotomy performed. These factors explain 42% of the total factors affecting the success of first-time phlebotomy. CONCLUSION:: Child's fear, anxiety before phlebotomy, and difficult vascular access affects the first-time phlebotomy success.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/psicología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Cateterismo Periférico/psicología , Conducta Infantil , Miedo , Flebotomía/psicología , Factores de Edad , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Flebotomía/efectos adversos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the experience of using a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in cancer sufferers receiving outpatient treatment. METHODS: A qualitative, phenomenological study was performed. Purposeful sampling methods were used. Data collection methods included semi-structured interviews and researcher field notes. Thematic analysis was used to analyze data. The study was conducted following the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (61% women, mean age 58 years) participated. They spent a mean duration of 155 days with the line in place. Two themes were identified with different subgroups. The theme "Living with a PICC line," including the subthemes "Benefits" and "Disadvantages," displays how the implantation is experienced by patients in a dichotomous manner. This highlighted both the beneficial and negative aspects of the implantation. The second theme was "Adapting to life with the catheter" and comprised three subthemes: "Advantages," "Lifestyle modifications," and "Overall assessment of the peripherally inserted central catheter," which shows how patients gradually accept the catheter by adapting their lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS: Over time, most patients considered having a PICC line to be a positive experience that they would recommend to other patients, as they found that it did not alter their quality of life. These results can be applied in Oncology Units for developing specific protocols for patients.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Cateterismo Periférico/psicología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Administración Intravenosa/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Oncología Médica/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Investigación Cualitativa , Encuestas y CuestionariosAsunto(s)
Ansiedad/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Hipnosis/métodos , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Terapia de Exposición Mediante Realidad Virtual , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Humanos , Hipnosis/instrumentación , Estrés Psicológico/diagnóstico , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia de Exposición Mediante Realidad Virtual/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
Objective A significant number of Japanese cancer patients refuse to have central venous (CV) ports implanted. The aim of this study is to investigate the experiences of patients prior to and after CV port implantation, as well as their expectations regarding the use of CV ports. Methods This study was carried out at Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases from October 20, 2014, to January 16, 2015. Data were collected using a questionnaire developed by the researchers, and various statistical analyses were performed. Results Among the 50 patients who participated in this study, the CV port was implanted due to poor venous access in 18 (36%). The proportion of patients who were anxious before the port implantation was significantly higher among the patients in whom CV ports were implanted due to poor venous access than among those in whom CV ports were implanted for other reasons. All patients exhibited high satisfaction levels, regardless of the reason for CV port implantation. CV port-related discomfort was most commonly associated with seat belts. Conclusion The patients exhibited high satisfaction levels regardless of the reason for CV port implantation. However, the patients that exhibited poor venous access often experienced anxiety before the implantation of the port, so it is important to provide such patients with sufficient information prior to port implantation. In order to improve the quality of life of patients with CV ports, medical staff should give special consideration to discomfort experienced by patients that are wearing seat belts.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/psicología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To understand the patient's perspective on complications associated with vascular access-related interventions. METHODS: A multi-stage comprehensive questionnaire of over 150 items was administered to 140 in-center hemodialysis patients in a large, Toronto-based academic-based facility from May 1, 2011 until July 1, 2014. The questionnaire was divided into three domains: physical complications, disruption to routine, and infection. For each of the 12 prespecified vascular access interventions, there were 9 items about the associated complications. The level of bother associated with complications was measured using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The mean Likert value (5 = extremely bothered) for the physical complications domain was highest for grafts at 1.92, followed closely by fistulas at 1.87, and catheters at 1.56. The mean Likert value for the "disruption of routine" domain was highest for catheters at 1.44, followed by grafts at 1.37, and fistulas at 1.33. For infectious complications of all vascular access-related interventions the mean Likert value was highest at 1.76 for catheters as compared to fistulas at 1.23 and grafts at 1.22. CONCLUSIONS: For hemodialysis patients, the physical complications associated with needle cannulation of fistulas and grafts are a major source of dissatisfaction, while infectious complications, including catheter-related infections, are not a significant source of their concerns. Future research should focus on developing methods to effectively: (i) reduce the fear and pain associated with cannulation and (ii) educate patients about the risks associated with vascular access-related infection.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Satisfacción del Paciente , Percepción , Diálisis Renal , Actividades Cotidianas , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/instrumentación , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/psicología , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/psicología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/terapia , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Contusiones/etiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Ontario , Dolor/etiología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Punciones , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This paper deals with the psyche of patients during intravenous therapy. Since any intervention in the physical integrity of individuals are necessarily reflected in their mental level, we decided to conduct a survey dealing with tolerance of intravenous therapy in cancer patients. Especially, we focused on long-term venous access devices tolerance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The aim of this study was to evaluate descriptively patients´ awareness of the administration of parenteral drugs, risks in the application and the differences between the administration of drugs to the central and peripheral venous system. To collect data, own questionnaire containing 21 questions was compiled. It was distributed to patients in the oncology department and outpatient oncology ward at the hospital Novy Jicin. Patients signed an informed consent for data collection. One hundred valid questionnaires were evaluated in the analysis of the data. RESULTS: The results of the study generally indicate that patients do not tolerate venous sampling and intravenous therapy optimally. Patients who have some form of venous access device are mostly satisfied, as it fulfills its mandate of maximum patient comfort. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that most patients know alternatives to peripheral drugs application. However, awareness of this issue is inadequate. The vast majority of patients would recommend the introduction of long-term venous access device to other patients.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Cateterismo Periférico/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intravenosa/instrumentación , Administración Intravenosa/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Most cancer patients require a totally-implanted central venous access device (TIVAD) for their treatment. This was a prospective, multicenter, open study to: (i) develop and validate a French-language questionnaire dubbed QASICC (Questionnaire for Acceptance of and Satisfaction with Implanted Central Venous Catheter) assessing patient's satisfaction with and acceptance of their TIVAD; (ii) develop a mean score of patient's acceptance and satisfaction; (iii) look for correlation between QASICC score and TIVAD patient/tumor pathology/device characteristics. METHODS: From 2011 November to 2012 December, the first version of the QASICC questionnaire that included 27 questions assessing seven dimensions was re-tested among 998 cancer patients in eleven French cancer hospitals (eight cancer research institutes and three university/general hospitals). The goal was: (i) to reduce the questionnaire item and dimension number (pertinency, saturation effect, item correlation); (ii) to assess its psychometric properties, demonstrate its validity and independency compared to (EORTC) QLQC30; (iii) to correlate clinical and pathological patient's/tumor's/TIVAD's parameters with the QASICC questionnaire score (the higher the overall score, the greater the acceptance and satisfaction). The questionnaire was administered to the patient 30 days (±15 days) after TIVAD's implantation. RESULTS: Among 998 questionnaires given to cancer patients, 658 were analyzed and 464 were fully assessed as there was no missing data. Time to fill-in the questionnaire was five minutes in 90% patients. Final QASICC tool included twenty-two questions assessing four homogeneous dimensions (65%Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología
, Catéteres Venosos Centrales
, Satisfacción del Paciente
, Encuestas y Cuestionarios
, Actividades Cotidianas
, Femenino
, Francia
, Humanos
, Masculino
, Dolor/psicología
, Privacidad
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this work is to evaluate the patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL), according to the type and location of vascular access used for dialysis procedure. METHODS: In this transversal study, 322 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients under online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF, 59.63% males; 64.9±14.3 years) were enrolled. Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) was used by 252 patients (78.3%), whereas 70 patients (21.7%) had a central venous catheter (CVC). Besides AVF location, data on comorbidities, hematological data, iron status, dialysis adequacy, nutritional and inflammatory markers were collected. Moreover, the patients' reported HRQOL score, using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form, was evaluated. RESULTS: ESRD patients using CVC as vascular access presented a decrease in four SF-36 domain scores, namely physical functioning, emotional well-being, role-emotional and energy/fatigue when compared with those using AVF as vascular access. Additionally, these patients also showed significant differences in ESRD target areas, namely decline in cognitive function and quality of social interaction domains. When comparing the variables according to the localization of the AVF, significant differences were found in three SF-36 domain scores, namely physical functioning, pain and general health. Moreover, we also found significant differences in ESRD target areas, namely symptoms/problem list, effects of kidney disease and quality of social interaction domains. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that ESRD patients under OL-HDF using AVF as vascular access had higher HRQOL scores in several domains when compared with those using CVC. Additionally, we also found that dialysis patients using AVF in the left forearm presented with higher HRQOL scores.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/psicología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Hemodiafiltración/psicología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Pacientes/psicología , Percepción , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Comorbilidad , Emociones , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Hemodiafiltración/efectos adversos , Humanos , Relaciones Interpersonales , Fallo Renal Crónico/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Implantable venous access ports are essential for patients requiring chronic venous access. The aim of this study was to determine securities, risks of complications and patients' satisfaction with using a port system. METHODS: Between April 2008 and May 2013, 220 consecutive patients (mean age: 53 ± 12 years; 155 female) were enrolled into this observational, single-centre study. 65 patients who received a port system were asked to complete a questionnaire with the aim of evaluating the patient's satisfaction and quality of life. RESULTS: First vena subclavia and later internal jugular were the most frequently used for venous access. Among serious complications, three cases (1.5%) of pneumothorax were observed. Technical difficulties of cannulation were observed in 12 cases (5.6%). In the late period, functional complications, defined as 'easy injection, impossible aspiration' at port access, affected more than 25% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of vascular ports is a safe procedure, and serious complications are rare. In the evaluated group, complications connected with the complete functioning of ports were observed. Among responders, more than 90% of patients reported high overall satisfaction.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anciano , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Catéteres de Permanencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumotórax/epidemiología , Neumotórax/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
To explore the experiences and educational needs of parents learning to use an Implanted Central Venous Access Device (IVAD) to administer clotting factor to their child with haemophilia. Parents of children with haemophilia who had learnt to administer clotting factor via IVAD attended focus groups to discuss their experiences of the learning process. Data were transcribed and analyzed thematically. Parents described distress and trauma in dealing with the diagnosis and treatment of their child's haemophilia. It was within this context that parents began the IVAD education process. Four major themes emerged from the data: dealing with fear and anxiety; a supportive learning environment; establishing a ritual and empowerment and liberation. Parents identified a supportive learning environment as their critical need rather than a specific learning process. In addition, the concept of ritual emerged both as a mechanism for increasing the child's comfort with the procedure and as a valuable learning tool for their parents. This study highlights the importance of consulting consumers to understand their experience of illness and their educational needs. Patient and family education programs should not be limited to the provision of information, but must establish and incorporate the needs of the learner.
Asunto(s)
Factores de Coagulación Sanguínea/administración & dosificación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Catéteres de Permanencia , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Padres/psicología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Adaptación Psicológica , Adolescente , Ansiedad , Niño , Preescolar , Miedo , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Masculino , Padres/educaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) are the vascular access of choice for hemodialysis (HD) compared with arteriovenous grafts (AVG) and central venous catheters (CVC). In spite of increasing recognition of importance of a patient's perception of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and depression, few studies have assessed the association of vascular access type with HRQOL and depression. The purpose of our study was to examine HRQOL and depression among patients with different vascular access. METHODS: Severity of symptoms of depression and HRQOL were assessed by Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Short Form-36 (SF-36), respectively. Vascular access was reported as one of three options; AVF, AVG, and CVC. RESULTS: In total, 136 patients were included; 104 had AVF, 15 had AVG, and 17 had CVC. BDI and HRQOL parameters differed among patients with different vascular access types. In post hoc analysis, BDI and HRQOL subscales were not different between patients with AVF and AVG. Patients with CVC had lower physical functioning (P:.001), role-physical limitation (P:.015), general health perception (P:.017), vitality (P:.010), social functioning (P:.004), role-emotional (P:.008), mental health (P:.001), physical component summary score (P:.017), and mental component summary score (P:.006) when compared to patients with AVF. Patients with CVC had lower physical functioning (P:.044), role-emotional (P:.044) and mental health scores (P:.04) when compared to patients with AVG. CONCLUSIONS: Having a CVC may negatively influence HRQOL in HD patients. Vascular access type does not seem to be related to depressed mood in HD.
Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/psicología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/psicología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Depresión/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis Renal/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/diagnóstico , Emociones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Percepción , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , TurquíaAsunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/provisión & distribución , Conducta de Elección , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Participación del Paciente , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Cateterismo Periférico/psicología , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Neoplasias/enfermería , Neoplasias/psicología , Investigación en Enfermería , Enfermería Oncológica , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Participación del Paciente/métodos , Participación del Paciente/psicología , Proyectos Piloto , Quebec , VenasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Though totally implantable access ports (TIAP) are extensively used, information from randomized trials about the impact of insertion site on patient's quality of life (QoL) and psychological distress is unavailable. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and three patients eligible for receiving intravenous chemotherapy for solid tumours were randomly assigned to implantation of a single type of TIAP, either through a percutaneous landmark access to the internal jugular or an ultrasound-guided access to the subclavian or a surgical cut-down access through the cephalic vein at the deltoid-pectoralis groove. Patients' QoL and psychological distress were investigated at regular intervals by means of EORTC QLQ-C30 and HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) questionnaires, using univariate and multivariate repeated measure linear mixed models. A post hoc analysis investigated the impact of type of administered chemotherapy (adjuvant vs palliative). RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty-four patients (95.2%) were evaluable, 126 with the internal jugular, 132 with the subclavian and 126 with the cephalic vein access. The median follow-up was 361 days (range, 0-1,087). Mean score changes for the items of the EORTC QLQ-C30 scales were significantly associated with type of administered chemotherapy only (P < 0.001), and not with implantation site. Frequency distribution of patients with depression and anxiety score greater than 10 at HADS was not significantly different, with respect either to type of administered chemotherapy or TIAP implantation site. CONCLUSION: Central venous insertion sites had no impact on patients' QoL and psychological distress. Patients undergoing palliative therapies showed worse EORTC QLQ-C30 scales.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Neoplasias/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Ansiedad/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Ultrasonografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
Infusion therapy has evolved dramatically over the past few decades. From being used only in emergencies and for critically-ill patients, intravenous (IV) therapy has become a specialized form of treatment used for almost 90% of hospitalized patients (Corrigan, 1995). Infusion therapy is the parenteral administration of fluids, medications, nutritional support, blood products and the transfusion of blood. Fluids are delivered through a vascular access device, which is inserted into a peripheral or central vein (Royal College of Nursing (RCN), 2003). The venous route is the most predictable and reliable way to administer fluids and drugs when oral administration is not longer achievable or appropriate.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Cateterismo Periférico/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/provisión & distribución , Fluidoterapia/instrumentación , Evaluación en Enfermería/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Cateterismo Venoso Central/enfermería , Cateterismo Venoso Central/psicología , Cateterismo Periférico/enfermería , Cateterismo Periférico/psicología , Conducta de Elección , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Fluidoterapia/enfermería , Fluidoterapia/psicología , Humanos , Participación del PacienteRESUMEN
In some circumstances, a high degree of sedation that results in a child being unconscious at the time of parental separation is desirable. We set out to investigate the efficacy and safety of a rectal premedication regimen designed to produce this increased level of sedation. Sixty-seven children aged two to 24 months were randomised into two groups. Group MK received 4 mg x kg(-1) ketamine, 0.5 mg x kg(-1) midazolam and 0.02 mg x kg(-1) atropine and group MKK received 8 mg x kg(-1) ketamine, 0.5 mg x kg(-1) midazolam and 0.02 mg x kg(-1) atropine per rectum. The sedation score at the time of parental separation 30 minutes after drug administration and the response to intravenous cannulation were evaluated on a four-point scale. Respiratory rate, heart rate and arterial oxygen saturation were recorded immediately before parental separation. More patients in group MKK were asleep during separation (62 vs 35%, P < 0.05). Fewer patients in group MKK cried during intravenous cannulation (37 vs 68%, P < 0.05). Sedation scores were significantly increased at both time points. There was no difference between groups in vital signs at the time of parental separation and no adverse respiratory events occurred during the study period. In cases where a high degree of sedation following premedication in infants and toddlers is desired, the addition of 8 mg x kg(-1) ketamine to 0.5 mg x kg(-1) midazolam and 0.02 mg x kg(-1) atropine administered rectally is more efficacious than 4 mg x kg(-1) ketamine.