RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis requires reliable, recurrent access to the circulatory system. Central venous tunneled dialysis catheters (TDC) are frequently used for patients receiving hemodialysis as a bridge to permanent vascular access or as a final option. TDC are prone to complications such as infection and dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence and predictors of TDC dysfunction in a cohort of chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study was based on data from an electronic database of chronic hemodialysis patients during 5 years of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 625 TDC were inserted in 361 patients, of which 234 (37.4%) were replaced due to dysfunction. The main insertion site was the right internal jugular vein. Diabetes mellitus was an important predictor of TDC dysfunction and was significantly correlated with TDC extraction. Chronic anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatment did not affect the rate of TDC dysfunction or replacement. CONCLUSIONS: TDC use for chronic dialysis patients is increasing and dysfunction is a major problem. In our study, we highlighted the high prevalence of TDC dysfunction and the need for further research to improve hemodialysis access as well as TDC patency and function.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and necessity of vasopressor infusion through midline catheter. METHODS: A convenient sampling method was used for a controlled study. A total of 88 adult patients who used vasopressors admitted to respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) of Fenyang Hospital in Shanxi Province from June 2022 to June 2023 were enrolled as the research subjects. A total of 44 patients who were infused with vasopressors through peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) from June to December 2022 were enrolled as the PICC group, and 44 patients who were infused with vasopressors through midline catheter from January to June 2023 were enrolled as the midline catheter group. Both groups of patients used the modified Sedinger technique under the guidance of B-ultrasound for puncture and catheter placement. The middle 1/3 site between the cubital fossa and the axilla was selected. The catheters were 5 Fr double lumen. After catheter placement, the patients were followed until catheter removal, death, or 30 days (whichever came first). Based on the Infusion therapy standards of practice revised by American Infusion Nurses Society (INS), and combined with the results of previous preliminary tests, the safety evaluation was conducted on incomplete catheter obstruction, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), phlebitis, thrombus within the catheter during extubation, redness of the puncture site (but no infection), and exudation of the puncture site in the two groups of patients. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in gender, age, catheter indwelling time, and primary disease between the two groups, indicating that the baseline data of the two groups were balanced and comparable. No CRBSI or phlebitis occurred in both groups during the observation period after catheterization. One patient in both groups had exudation at the puncture site [both were 2.27% (1/44)]. Compared with the PICC group, the incidence of incomplete catheter obstruction, thrombus within the catheter during extubation, redness of the puncture site (but no infection) in the midline catheter group were lowered [incomplete catheter obstruction: 4.55% (2/44) vs. 6.82% (3/44), thrombus within the catheter during extubation: 0% (0/44) vs. 2.27% (1/44), redness of the puncture site (but no infection): 0% (0/44) vs. 4.55% (2/44)], the overall incidence was significantly decreased [6.82% (3/44) vs. 15.91% (7/44), P < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: Administering vasopressor through a midline catheter can reduce the incidence of catheter-related complications, decrease the rate of central venous catheterization, and reduce the financial burden on patients.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of the superficial cervical plexus (SCP) and ultrasonography (USG)-guided intermediate cervical plexus (ICP) blocks for patient and operator satisfaction during central venous catheterisation (CVC). STUDY DESIGN: Experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkiye, between May and July 2022. METHODOLOGY: Eighty patients were randomly assigned to the ICP and SCP block groups before CVC. Patients received 10ml of a local anaesthesia. Pain levels were assessed during needle insertion, dilation, catheter insertion, and suturing, and 5 minutes after the procedure using a 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Thirty minutes post-procedure, patient and operator satisfaction were evaluated using a 5-point Likert-type scale. RESULTS: The ICP block group had lower mean pain scores than the SCP block group during needle entry, dilation, and 5 minutes after CVC (p = 0.022, p <0.001, and p = 0.005, respectively). However, no significant differences were found in pain scores after the block application, during catheter insertion, and suturing (p = 0.279, p = 0.052, and p = 0.072, respectively). Patient and operator satisfaction scores did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.189 and p = 0.329, respectively). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that the ICP and SCP blocks resulted in comparable patient and operator satisfaction levels during CVC. Given that the ICP block resulted in lower pain scores at various stages of the procedure, it is a recommended method to enhance overall patient comfort and minimise the pain during CVC. KEY WORDS: Central venous catheterisation, Intermediate cervical plexus block, Superficial cervical plexus block, Patient satisfaction.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Central venous access is common practice in intensive care, anesthesia and emergency departments. It is, however, a delicate technical procedure, prone to complications. We present a case report on the placement of a left jugular central venous line in the emergency room, which was thought to be a routine procedure. However, the operator observed arterial blood during sampling, and the central line was described as poorly positioned on the control X-ray. After verification and other examinations, the existence of a vertical vein was discovered in this patient, connecting the left superior pulmonary vein to the brachiocephalic trunk. A poorly positioned central venous line can therefore lead to the discovery of asympomatic congenital vascular anomalies, unrelated to the clinical context. This case study illustrates the various tools available to ensure the correct position of a central venous line, and their clinical implications.

La mise en place d'une voie veineuse centrale est de pratique courante aux soins intensifs, en anesthésie et aux urgences. Il s'agit cependant d'un acte technique relativement invasif, délicat et potentiellement sujet à complications. Nous présentons un cas clinique relatant la mise en place d'une voie veineuse centrale jugulaire gauche en salle de déchocage, manœuvre réputée banale. Cependant, l'opérateur objective visuellement du sang d'allure artérielle lors du prélèvement sanguin sur le cathéter. En outre, l'imagerie par radiographie thoracique décrit une malposition de ce dispositif. Après vérifications et examens complémentaires, nous découvrons finalement l'existence d'une veine verticale chez ce patient, reliant la veine pulmonaire supérieure gauche au tronc brachio-céphalique. Une voie veineuse centrale, apparemment mal positionnée, peut, dès lors, conduire à la découverte d'anomalies vasculaires congénitales asymptomatiques, sans lien nécessaire avec le contexte clinique sous-jacent. Ce cas clinique nous permet d'aborder les différents outils à notre disposition actuelle afin de déterminer le positionnement adéquat d'une voie veineuse centrale et les implications cliniques qui en découlent.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although percutaneous central venous port (CVP) placement can be quickly performed using minimally invasive surgery, short- and long-term complications can occur. Beginner pediatric surgeons must overcome learning curves influencing operative time and complication rates. However, few studies have been conducted on the learning curve of ultrasound-guided percutaneous CVP placement. This study analyzed the progress, results, complications, and learning curve of ultrasound-guided percutaneous CVP placement in children performed by a single beginner pediatric surgeon. METHODS: Data from 30 children who underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous CVP placement were reviewed. The patient characteristics, procedure indications, access veins, operator positions, operative times, and complication rates were analyzed. RESULTS: Cumulative sum analysis revealed two stages in the learning curve: stage 1 (initial 15 cases) and stage 2 (subsequent cases). There was a correlation between the number of cases and operative time (Pearson correlation = -0.499, p = 0.005); the operative time was significantly longer in the first than in the second stage (p = 0.007). Although surgical complications occurred more frequently in the early (26.7%) than in the late stage, it was not significantly different between the two stages (p = 0.1). During the study period, the operative time was significantly reduced owing to the change in the operator's position from the patient's right side to the patient's head (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous CVP placement was a safe surgery that allowed a beginner pediatric surgeon to overcome the learning curve after only 15 cases and involved a relatively small number of complications compared with other pediatric surgeries. Additionally, the suitable position of the operator affected the surgical outcomes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

In children, there are two main techniques for placing a tunneled central venous catheter: single-incision (single puncture) and conventional (two punctures). Both have unique advantages and disadvantages. The modified single-stick technique combines the two aforementioned techniques to access the central venous system in an optimized way. This technique is feasible to perform particularly in young children and has a short learning curve for adult interventional radiologists.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patients with intestinal failure (IF) require long-term parenteral nutrition using central venous catheters (CVCs), which often require replacement. We adopted a less fallible guidewire replacement (GWR) method and verified its effectiveness and validity. METHODS: We enrolled 108 cases that underwent a CVC replacement with "GWR" method with IF at our department between 2013 and 2023. We retrospectively reviewed patients' clinical details with tunneled CVC (Hickman/Broviac catheter). For the analysis, we compared for the same time period the catheter exchange method "Primary placement"; newly inserted catheter by venipuncture. RESULTS: The success rate of catheter replacement using GWR was 94.4%. There were six unsuccessful cases. A log-rank test showed no significant difference in catheter survival between primary placement and the GWR, and the time to first infection was significantly longer in the GWR (p = 0.001). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the two methods until the first infection, when the exchange indication was limited to infections. In the same way, when the indication was restricted to catheter-related bloodstream infection, there was no significant difference in catheter survival between the two approaches. CONCLUSION: Our GWR procedure was easy to perform and stable, with a high success rate and almost no complications. Moreover, using a guidewire did not increase the frequency of catheter replacement and the infection rate.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

<b>Introduction:</b> A venous port system consists of a port chamber attached to a central catheter, which is implanted into the central venous system. The removal of the vascular port includes all items of this system. This procedure is usually simple and quick. Complications with port removal are rare but possible.<b>Aim:</b> The study aimed to summarize venous port removal procedures performed by pediatric surgeons.<b>Material and methods:</b> The single-center, retrospective study was conducted on 360 pediatric patients treated during the years 2010-2022 in the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Traumatology, and Urology in Poznan.<b>Results:</b> The port usage time before the removal ranged from 3 days to 8 years and 3 months, with an average of 22 months. The leading cause of vascular port removal was the end of treatment (78.06%). Other less frequent reasons were the infection (13.89%) and mechanical damage of the port (3.33%). There were almost no complications connected with the procedure of vascular port removal (92.2%). If the complications occurred, they included bleeding during surgery (3%), covering the vascular catheter with bone tissue of the clavicle, causing difficulties with the catheter removal from the vein (1.4%), and connected with the previous complications-prolonged clavicle pain after surgery (1.4%) and hematoma after surgery (2%).<b>Conclusions:</b> Removing the venous port is a safe procedure with a low risk of complications. This procedure can be considered as an appropriate training procedure for young trainees. A more extended period of use of the vascular port before its removal may be associated with more difficulties during surgery.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: USG vascular probe and TEE probe can help during central venous catheterization (CVC) and can confirm the location of guide wire in the neck vessels. We proposed this study, as there are only few studies comparing between TEE probe as surface probe and USG vascular probe for right IJV cannulation. AIMS: To compare the TEE probe as a surface probe and USG vascular probe during right IJV catheterization in cardiac surgeries. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective, comparative study. METHODS AND MATERIAL: One twenty-four patients of either sex posted for major elective cardiac surgery were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups (TEE group and USG group) of 62 by assigning the study participants alternatively to each group. The goal of this study was to compare the puncture time, visualization of IJV to first successful puncture, quality of the imaging with needle tip positioning, and catheter positioning using both TEE probe and vascular probe. The primary outcome was comparison of time from visualization of the IJV to successful puncture using both TEE probe as a surface probe and vascular probe. Secondary outcome was to compare the quality of image with respect to needle tip positioning and compare quality of image with respect to catheter position using both probes. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistical analyses were performed by using a statistical software package SPSS, version 20.0. RESULTS: The observation and results of our study clearly show the feasibility of TEE as surface probe for guiding central venous catheter in right IJV just like the vascular linear probe. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). No statistical differences were found in the puncture time, image quality, needle tip positioning, wire positioning, and catheter positioning between the two groups. All the P values were greater than 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: The TEE probe can be used as an alternative method to guide IJV puncturing and catheterization when the vascular probe is not available. It is feasible especially in cardiac surgeries where the TEE monitoring machine is a must in modern anesthesia and readily available than an ultrasound machine.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study assess the feasibility of integrating virtual reality (VR) simulation into the central venous catheter (CVC) placement training curriculum. DESIGN: The study consists of 3 parts: (1) Evaluating current manikin-based training for CVC placement through surveys for senior first-year anesthesia residents and cardiac anesthesia faculty who supervise resident performing the procedure; (2) Interventional study training novice trainees with VR simulator and assessing their reaction satisfaction; and (3) pilot study integrating VR training sessions into CVC training curriculum for first-year anesthesia residents. SETTING: Conducted at a single academic-affiliated medical center from December 2022 to August 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Junior first-year anesthesia residents. INTERVENTIONS: VR training sessions for CVC placements using the Vantari VR system. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome: novice trainees' satisfaction with VR training for CVC procedure. Satisfaction of resident and faculty with standard manikin-based training was also collected. Faculty expressed concerns about residents' confidence and perceived knowledge in performing CVC placement independently. Novice trainees showed high satisfaction and perceived usefulness with VR training, particularly in understanding procedural steps and developing spatial awareness. Pilot integration of VR training into the curriculum demonstrated comparable training times and emphasized structured stepwise training modules to ensure completion of vital procedural steps. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the potential of VR simulation as a complementary training tool for CVC placement rather than a substitution of standard manikin training. VR is offering immersive experiences and addressing limitations of traditional manikin-based training methods. The integration of VR into training curricula warrants further exploration to optimize procedural proficiency and patient safety in clinical practice.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Safety of central venous catheter (CVC) placement relies on some general aspects, including selection of the right vessel, correct lumen targeting while inserting the needle, check the position of catheter tip, and post-procedure check for complications. All these four points can be guided by bedside ultrasound, but the best technique to ensure the position of the CVC tip is still uncertain. METHODS: We investigated feasibility of a novel ultrasound technique consisting of focused view of guidewire tip in the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) to calculate the CVC depth in adult patients needing CVC placement in emergency. Direct visualization of the guidewire in the CAJ was used to calculate how deep the CVC needed to be inserted. In those patients without a valid CAJ window, a bubble test in the right atrium was performed to position the CVC tip. In all cases chest radiography confirmed the CVC position. RESULTS: The procedure was performed in 37 patients and CVC was correctly placed in all cases. Within the group, in 25 patients the CVC depth (21.5 ± 6.0 cm) was successfully measured. In other 11 patients the correct CVC tip position was confirmed by the bubble test. In only one case it was not possible to use ultrasound for incomplete CAJ and right atrium views. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the feasibility of a new ultrasound method to ensure the correct CVC tip position. This protocol could potentially become a standard method reducing costs, post-procedural irradiation, and time of CVC placement in emergency.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Central venous access devices (CVADs) are commonly used for the treatment of paediatric cancer patients. Catheter locking is a routine intervention that prevents CVAD-associated adverse events, such as infection, occlusion and thrombosis. While laboratory and clinical data are promising, tetra-EDTA (T-EDTA) has yet to be rigorously evaluated or introduced in cancer care as a catheter lock. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a two-arm, superiority type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomised controlled trial conducted at seven hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. Randomisation will be in a 3:2 ratio between the saline (heparinised saline and normal saline) and T-EDTA groups, with randomly varied blocks of size 10 or 20 and stratification by (1) healthcare facility; (2) CVAD type and (3) duration of dwell since insertion. Within the saline group, there will be a random allocation between normal and heparin saline. Participants can be re-recruited and randomised on insertion of a new CVAD. Primary outcome for effectiveness will be a composite of CVAD-associated bloodstream infections (CABSI), CVAD-associated thrombosis or CVAD occlusion during CVAD dwell or at removal. Secondary outcomes will include CABSI, CVAD-associated-thrombosis, CVAD failure, incidental asymptomatic CVAD-associated-thrombosis, other adverse events, health-related quality of life, healthcare costs and mortality. To achieve 90% power (alpha=0.05) for the primary outcome, data from 720 recruitments are required. A mixed-methods approach will be employed to explore implementation contexts from the perspective of clinicians and healthcare purchasers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been provided by Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (HREC/22/QCHQ/81744) and the University of Queensland HREC (2022/HE000196) with subsequent governance approval at all sites. Informed consent is required from the substitute decision-maker or legal guardian prior to participation. In addition, consent may also be obtained from mature minors, depending on the legislative requirements of the study site. The primary trial and substudies will be written by the investigators and published in peer-reviewed journals. The findings will also be disseminated through local health and clinical trial networks by investigators and presented at conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12622000499785.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of thrombosis. They often need parenteral nutrition (PN) requiring intravenous access for prolonged periods. We assessed the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and tunneled catheters for patients with IBD receiving home PN (HPN). METHODS: Using the Cleveland Clinic HPN Registry, we retrospectively studied a cohort of adults with IBD who received HPN between June 30, 2019 and January 1, 2023. We collected demographics, catheter type, and catheter-associated DVT (CADVT) data. We performed descriptive statistics and Poisson tests to compare CADVT rates among parameters of interest. We generated Kaplan-Meier graphs to illustrate longevity of CADVT-free survival and a Cox proportional hazard model to calculate the hazard ratio associated with CADVT. RESULTS: We collected data on 407 patients, of which, 276 (68%) received tunneled catheters and 131 (32%) received PICCs as their initial catheter. There were 17 CADVTs with an overall rate of 0.08 per 1000 catheter days, whereas individual rates of DVT for PICCs and tunneled catheters were 0.16 and 0.05 per 1000 catheter days, respectively (P = 0.03). After adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidity, CADVT risk was significantly higher for PICCs compared with tunneled catheters, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.962 (95% CI=1.140-7.698; P = 0.025) and adjusted incidence rate ratio of 3.66 (95% CI=2.637-4.696; P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that CADVT risk is nearly three times higher with PICCs compared with tunneled catheters. We recommend tunneled catheter placement for patients with IBD who require HPN infusion greater than 30 days.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Billions of vascular access devices (VADs) are inserted annually for intravenous therapy worldwide. However, their use is not without challenges. Facilitating the process and enhancing results, hospital authorities have created vascular access specialist teams (VASTs) with advanced competencies in the evaluation, insertion, care and management of VADs. The objective is to compare the effectiveness of VASTs versus standard practice regarding cannulation success and vascular access maintenance in hospitalised adults. DESIGN: Systematic review, using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a structured data search on Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus and EBSCOhost up to 31 May 2023. We did not impose a time limit regarding the date of publication. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were eligible for inclusion in the review if they were randomised and non-randomised trials and observational studies. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We included studies that described or evaluated the activity of VASTs compared with clinical practitioners. The outcomes analysed were the success of the cannulation and the incidence of associated adverse effects. RESULTS: The search strategy produced 3053 papers published between 1984 and 2020, from which 12 were selected for analysis. VASTs are heterogeneously described among these studies, which mainly focus on insertions, frequently for patients with difficult intravenous access. Some patients presented with specific needs or requirement for specific insertion technique or catheter type. Compared with usual practice, these studies indicate that the involvement of a VAST is associated with a higher effectiveness in terms of first attempt insertions and insertion success rates, and a reduction in catheter-associated adverse events. However, meta-analyses confirming this trend are not currently possible. CONCLUSIONS: It seems apparent that VASTS contribute to improving the health of patients during the administration of intravenous. VASTs seem to increase the effectiveness of VAD insertion and care and reduce complications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021231259.

Asunto(s)

Asunto(s)