Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 8.113
Filtrar
1.
J Infus Nurs ; 47(5): 324-346, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39250768

RESUMEN

Midline catheters have recently gained popularity in clinical use, with a common reason being the reduction of central venous catheter use and central line-associated bloodstream infections. At the same time, the number of nononcology vesicant medications has increased, and midline catheters are frequently being used for infusions of vesicant medications. The Infusion Nurses Society (INS) Vesicant Task Force identified midline catheter use as a possible risk factor for extravasation and concluded that a thorough literature review was necessary. This review highlights the variations in catheter terminology and tip locations, the frequency of infiltration and extravasation in published studies, and case reports of infiltration and extravasation from midline catheters. It also examines the many clinical issues requiring evidence-based decision-making for the most appropriate type of vascular access devices. After more than 30 years of clinical practice with midline catheters and what appears to be a significant number of studies, evidence is still insufficient to answer questions about infusion of vesicant and irritant medications through midline catheters. Given the absence of consensus on tip location, inadequate evidence of clinical outcomes, and importance of patient safety, the continuous infusion of vesicants, all parenteral nutrition formulas, and infusates with extremes in pH and osmolarity should be avoided through midline catheters.


Asunto(s)
Extravasación de Materiales Terapéuticos y Diagnósticos , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Irritantes/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos
2.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 26(8): 508-513, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39254412

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis requires reliable, recurrent access to the circulatory system. Central venous tunneled dialysis catheters (TDC) are frequently used for patients receiving hemodialysis as a bridge to permanent vascular access or as a final option. TDC are prone to complications such as infection and dysfunction. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence and predictors of TDC dysfunction in a cohort of chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study was based on data from an electronic database of chronic hemodialysis patients during 5 years of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 625 TDC were inserted in 361 patients, of which 234 (37.4%) were replaced due to dysfunction. The main insertion site was the right internal jugular vein. Diabetes mellitus was an important predictor of TDC dysfunction and was significantly correlated with TDC extraction. Chronic anticoagulation and antiplatelet treatment did not affect the rate of TDC dysfunction or replacement. CONCLUSIONS: TDC use for chronic dialysis patients is increasing and dysfunction is a major problem. In our study, we highlighted the high prevalence of TDC dysfunction and the need for further research to improve hemodialysis access as well as TDC patency and function.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres de Permanencia , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Prevalencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Anciano , Venas Yugulares , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Falla de Equipo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Israel/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento
3.
Am Fam Physician ; 110(3): 251-258, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39283848

RESUMEN

Family physicians often treat patients who require urinary management with the use of external urinary devices, clean intermittent catheterization, or indwelling urinary catheterization. External urinary devices are indicated for urinary incontinence (postvoid residual less than 300 mL), urine volume measurement for hospitalized patients, nonsterile urine diagnostic testing, improved comfort for patients in hospice or palliative care, and fall prevention for high-risk patients. Indwelling urinary catheterization is indicated for severe urinary retention or bladder outlet obstruction; wound healing in the sacrum, buttocks, or perineal area; prolonged immobilization; and as a palliative measure for patients who are terminally ill. Clean intermittent catheterization is an alternative to indwelling urinary catheterization for acute or chronic urinary retention (postvoid residual greater than 300 mL) without bladder outlet obstruction, sterile urine testing, postvoid residual volume assessment, and wound healing. Suprapubic catheter placement is considered when long-term catheterization is needed or urethral catheterization is not feasible. Urinary catheters should not be used solely for staff or caregiver convenience, incontinence-related dermatitis, urine culture procurement from a voiding patient, or initial incontinence management. Common complications of urinary catheter use include obstruction, bladder spasm, urine leakage, and skin breakdown of the sacrum, buttocks, or perineum. The risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infections increases with the duration of catheter use. Urologist referral is indicated for patients requiring urinary management who have recurrent urinary tract infections, acute infectious urinary retention, suspected urethral injury, or substantial urethral discomfort or if long-term catheterization is being considered.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Urinario , Catéteres Urinarios , Humanos , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Urinario/métodos , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Retención Urinaria/terapia , Retención Urinaria/diagnóstico , Retención Urinaria/etiología , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Infecciones Urinarias/terapia , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Incontinencia Urinaria/terapia , Incontinencia Urinaria/diagnóstico
4.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(9): 1690-1692, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39279079

RESUMEN

Chronic kidney disease has become a significant global health issue, with some individuals progressing to endstage renal disease (ESRD) and requiring renal replacement therapy. For ESRD patients undergoing haemodialysis, the first step is to establish vascular access. In emergency situations, inserting a haemodialysis catheter (HDC) into the central vein is often the most appropriate approach; the right internal jugular vein (IJV) is considered the optimal site for catheterisation. However, catheter placement in the right IJV can sometimes lead to inadvertent entry into an abnormal position. Herein, we present a unique case in which the tip of the HDC was noted to have misplaced into the left IJV due to the patient's multiple central venous stenosis (CVS). This case highlights the clinical manifestation of HDC misplacement, with CVS being the underlying cause. Therefore, healthcare providers should pay adequate attention to CVS.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Venas Yugulares , Fallo Renal Crónico , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Venas Yugulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos
5.
J Int Med Res ; 52(9): 3000605241260556, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39224951

RESUMEN

The penetration of a peritoneal dialysis catheter into the intestinal cavity is a clinically rare complication. In the present retrospective clinical case series, 11 patients with uraemia who received continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and attended hospital between 2019 and 2023 are described. The median patient age was 61.91 ± 11.33 years. All patients had previously experienced peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis and were clinically cured by infusing sensitive antibiotics into the abdominal cavity. Colonoscopy was utilised to locate the penetrating catheter and close the perforation with a titanium clip once the catheter had been removed via an external approach. Following a 2-4-week fast, the perforations healed in all 11 patients. The present authors' experience illustrates that directly removing the catheter and clamping the perforation opening under the guidance of colonoscopy is simple to operate with few complications compared with traditional open surgery.


Asunto(s)
Diálisis Peritoneal Ambulatoria Continua , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Diálisis Peritoneal Ambulatoria Continua/efectos adversos , Diálisis Peritoneal Ambulatoria Continua/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Colonoscopía/métodos , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/diagnóstico , Diálisis Peritoneal/instrumentación , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Adulto
6.
Afr J Paediatr Surg ; 21(3): 204-206, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39162758

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: A chemoport is widely used in paediatric oncology population. Removal is a relatively easy procedure, but difficulty can be encountered in case the catheter is densely adherent to the vascular wall. It is a rare complication and is associated with long indwelling duration and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Forceful traction can lead to vascular injury and high morbidity. Herein, we report a 7-year-old girl with precursor B ALL who had delayed chemoport removal due to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The removal process was difficult, as the catheter was adherent to the right innominate vein. Out of panic, the surgeon pulled it out forcefully. Fortunately, the catheter and its fragment were successfully retrieved completely and the child was discharged the next day. The management strategy varies and ranges from minimally invasive to open surgery. Leaving a stuck chemoport catheter in situ can be a bailout method or part of conservative management.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Remoción de Dispositivos , Humanos , Niño , Femenino , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/terapia , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/cirugía , Pandemias
7.
BMC Nephrol ; 25(1): 273, 2024 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39187762

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Refractory exit-site infections (ESIs) and tunnel infections (TIs) are challenging complications for patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). This study compared the outcomes of surgical intervention, notably the cuff-shaving (CS) procedure coupled with negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT), and conservative management strategies for patients with refractory ESI and TI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent PD at our center, focusing on the incidence and management of ESI and TI. We evaluated and compared treatment outcomes, including ESI scores, frequency of ESI and/or TI, identification of causative microorganisms, and duration of catheter survival or time until removal. RESULTS: We identified 97 episodes of catheter-related ESI and/or TI across 71 patients with an incidence rate of 0.15 episodes per patient-year. Of the 23 patients with refractory ESI and/or TI, surgical intervention was performed in 8, while 15 chose conservative management. In the one-month follow-up, patients who underwent CS combined with NPWT showed no complications such as leakage, and their local symptoms resolved completely. The mean PD catheter survival time was significantly longer in the surgical group (29.38 ± 7.25 months) than in the conservative group (7.86 ± 2.13 months). Surgical intervention demonstrated a significantly higher therapeutic efficacy and extended catheter survival. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CS and NPWT as a surgical approach is crucial for eradicating infectious foci and significantly improving the longevity of PD catheter function. This integrated surgical strategy offers a promising solution for the management of refractory ESI and TI in patients undergoing PD.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/terapia , Anciano , Diálisis Peritoneal , Resultado del Tratamiento , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Adulto , Tratamiento Conservador
8.
Ren Fail ; 46(2): 2389185, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39165180

RESUMEN

Backgrounds: The malfunction of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter is still an intractable problem. A modified open surgical revision technique with suturing fixation and without catheter removal for malfunctioning catheter was developed to evaluated the efficacy and safety between simultaneous catheter replacement technique.Methods: A total of 167 PD patients with malfunctioning catheter were retrospectively reviewed. For the salvage of PD catheters, patients underwent modified open surgical revision (group A) or simultaneous catheter replacement (group B). The baseline characteristics before operation, perioperative condition, complications and outcomes were compared between both groups.Results: Patients of group A showed significantly shorter operative time (67.4 ± 22.1 versus 82.8 ± 21.1 min, p = 0.009), less postoperative pain score within 24 h (median 0.0 versus 2.0, p < 0.001), quicker start of PD (1.06 ± 0.31 versus 1.89 ± 0.89 days, p < 0.001), shorter length of stay (9.89 ± 5.11 versus 12.55 ± 7.37 days, p = 0.020) than group B. In terms of complications, the incidence of recurred catheter malfunction in group A was significantly lower than those in group B (1/114 versus 12/53, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in mechanical complications (bloody effluent, dialysate leakage, and hernia) and early peritonitis between the groups. The group A patients had a favorable catheter survival rate compared with group B (log-rank, p = 0.004).Conclusions: Our modified open surgical revision technique is a safe, simple and fast method, and offers a better outcome with minimal risk of recurrence of catheter malfunction without additional cost and equipment. This technique is worthy of clinical application.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Falla de Equipo , Diálisis Peritoneal , Reoperación , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Diálisis Peritoneal/instrumentación , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Anciano , Adulto , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Tiempo de Internación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tempo Operativo , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentación
9.
Sci Prog ; 107(3): 368504241260374, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39096050

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Persistent withdrawal occlusion (PWO) is a specific catheter malfunction characterized by the inability to withdraw blood through the device. The most common cause of PWO in ports is the presence of a fibroblastic sleeve (FS). If malfunction occurs, medication can be applied incorrectly with the increased risk of complications. METHODS: One hundred seventy-seven cases of PWO in venous ports were managed. We focused on evaluating the cause of PWO, the frequency of occurrence of FS, and the options to address the malfunction. The patients underwent fluoroscopy with a contrast agent administration. Mechanical disruption (MD) with a syringe of saline using the flush method was used; in case of its failure, subsequent administration of a lock solution with taurolidine and urokinase, or low-dose thrombolysis with alteplase was indicated. Demographic data were compared with a control group. RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of female patients was found in the cohort of patients with PWO (80.3% vs 66.3%, p = 0.004), dominantly patients with ovarian cancer (12.8% vs 4.8%, p = 0.022). No effect of the cannulated vein or the type of treatment on the incidence of PWO was demonstrated. The presence of FS was verified in 70% of cases. MD with a syringe was successful in 53.5% of cases. A significantly shorter time to referral (3 weeks) was demonstrated with successful management. The overall success rate of achieving desobliteration by MD alone or in combination with a thrombolytic (urokinase or alteplase) administration was 97.4%. CONCLUSION: We created a method for resolving PWO using MD +/- application of thrombolytics with 97.4% success rate. Current evidence showed that FS is not likely to be affected by thrombolytic drugs; however, we have ascertained an effect of these drugs, proposing a hypothesis of microthrombotic events at the tip of the catheter if fibroblastic sleeve is present.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Anciano , Adulto , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Obstrucción del Catéter/etiología
10.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 149(16): 974-979, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39094602

RESUMEN

Port systems provide safe venous access for patients with poor venous status and are essential for the long-term administration of drugs such as chemotherapeutics. However, they are not without complications. Port infection is a life-threatening situation; the infection rate in current studies varies from 0.8% to 7.5% and is significantly higher in cancer patients at 16-31%. The purpose of this SOP is to provide an overview of the management of port infections.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos
12.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 469, 2024 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39110241

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: About 50% of individuals with long-term indwelling catheters are affected by catheter encrustations and bladder stone formation. Therefore, prophylaxis of catheter encrustations is important. Currently, however, neither an established prophylaxis nor a standardized in-vitro model to test different measures exist. We have therefore developed and qualitatively evaluated an in-vitro model of catheter encrustation. METHODS: Size 14 French suprapubic catheters were incubated under sterile conditions at 37 degrees Celsius in five different media: (1) sterile artificial urine (n = 16), (2) artificial urine with E. coli (n = 8), (3) with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 8), (4) with Proteus mirabilis (n = 8), and (5) with a mix of these three strains (n = 8). Catheter balloons were inflated either a glycerine or a bactericidal solution. After 6 weeks, the catheters were removed from the solution, dried, and weighed, and a photometric determination of the retrieved encrustations was performed. RESULTS: Most frequently and pronounced encrustations were detected in the Pseudomonas group. The median weight of these encrustations (50% struvite and brushite) was 84.4 mg (47.7 mg / 127.3 mg). Even on catheters stored in sterile urine, encrustations (69.2% struvite) were found. Bacterial growth was not affected by the medium used for catheter blockage. CONCLUSION: Although in-vitro models appear to be limited because they lack "the human factor", they are valuable for systematically assessing physico-chemical factors affecting encrustations. Therefore, our model, being reliable and cost-effective, may foster further research despite its limitations.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres Urinarios , Humanos , Catéteres Urinarios/microbiología , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Proteus mirabilis/aislamiento & purificación , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Técnicas In Vitro , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Escherichia coli , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Urinario/instrumentación , Modelos Biológicos
13.
Cien Saude Colet ; 29(8): e05602024, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Portugués, Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39140539

RESUMEN

A long-term indwelling catheter may be indicated in clinical situations, such as chronic diseases of the genitourinary or neurological systems. In addition to the risks of infection, trauma, and bleeding, a catheter's permanence can affect psycho-emotional and socioeconomic dimensions. We aimed to understand how the need to use a long-term indwelling catheter affects this patient's self-perception, interrelationships, and self-care. We carried out a qualitative, descriptive study based on interviews with 17 patients, and applied thematic analysis and complex thinking. The different prognoses and expectations regarding the catheter influenced self-perception, adaptation, acceptance, or denial. The presence of a catheter, whether as a curative measure or for comfort, can affect self-image and sexuality, and generate insecurities and uncertainties, which require understanding the multidimensionality of situations that suffer interference from the personal, family, and social environment, as well as health systems' capacity to deal with it. Despite the challenges, the majority of participants reported a favorable disposition towards self-care, whether to enable catheter removal or to prevent injuries in lifelong indications.


O cateter vesical de longa permanência pode ser indicado em situações clínicas, como nas doenças crônicas do sistema genitourinário ou neurológico. Além dos riscos de infecção, traumas e sangramentos, a permanência do cateter pode afetar dimensões psicoemocionais e socioeconômicas. Objetivamos compreender como a necessidade de uso do cateter urinário por um longo prazo afeta a autopercepção, as interrelações e o autocuidado deste paciente. Realizamos um estudo qualitativo, descritivo, a partir da entrevista de 17 pacientes, e aplicamos a análise temática e o pensamento complexo. Os diferentes prognósticos e as expectativas em relação ao cateter influenciaram a autopercepção, a adaptação, sua aceitação ou negação. A presença do cateter, seja como medida curativa ou para conforto, pode afetar a autoimagem e a sexualidade, gerar inseguranças e incertezas, que requerem compreensão da multidimensionalidade das situações, que sofrem interferências do meio pessoal, familiar e social, bem como da capacidade dos sistemas de saúde para o seu enfrentamento. Apesar dos desafios, a maioria dos participantes relatou disposição favorável para o autocuidado, seja para viabilizar retirada do cateter, ou para prevenir agravos em indicações vitalícias.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Autocuidado , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Adulto , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano , Entrevistas como Asunto , Autoimagen , Atención Ambulatoria , Investigación Cualitativa , Pacientes Ambulatorios/psicología , Adulto Joven
14.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 40(9): 2659-2665, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028349

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Removing ventricular catheters, particularly those implanted for extended periods, poses significant challenges for neurosurgeons due to potential complications such as bleeding from adhesions to the ependyma or choroid plexus. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review various techniques for safely removing ventricular catheters, emphasizing methods that minimize the risk of hemorrhagic complications. METHODS: A comprehensive narrative review focused on techniques developed and documented in the literature for safely detaching ventricular catheters adhered to brain structures. RESULTS: Various techniques have been identified that enhance the safety of catheter removal. Notably, the use of monopolar diathermy to coagulate and release adhesions has proven effective. Innovations such as insulated suction devices and the strategic use of flexible endoscopes have also contributed to safer removal procedures, minimizing the risk of damaging surrounding cerebral tissue and preventing catastrophic hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: The removal of ventricular catheters, especially those with long-term implantation, requires precise and cautious techniques to avoid severe complications. The study underscores the importance of adopting advanced surgical techniques and the continuous evolution of safer practices in neurosurgery. These methods not only ensure patient safety but also facilitate the handling of potentially complex and life-threatening situations during catheter removal.


Asunto(s)
Remoción de Dispositivos , Humanos , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodos , Remoción de Dispositivos/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Ventrículos Cerebrales/cirugía
15.
Arch Esp Urol ; 77(5): 577-583, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38982787

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Indwelling urinary catheter is closely associated with the occurrence of urinary tract infection (UTI). Herein, we further explored the correlation of urinary catheter indwelling time and UTI. METHODS: Retrospectively, the medical data of nosocomial patients (n = 681) were collected during two quarters of April 2023 to June 2023 (the second quarter, 23.4-23.6, n = 330) and July 2023 to September 2023 (the third quarter, 23.7-23.9, n = 351). The baseline data and incidence of catheter-related UTI were analysed. The total hospitalisation days and indwelling urinary catheter days of patients in five departments were assessed, namely, coronary care unit (CCU), respiratory intensive care unit (RICU), surgical intensive care unit (SICU), neurology intensive care unit (NICU) and cardiac surgical intensive care unit (CSICU) departments. The correlation between hospitalisation days/indwelling urinary catheter days and the occurrence of UTI was evaluated by Spearman correlation analysis. RESULTS: In the CCU, RICU, SICU, NICU and CSICU departments, the number of patients was 463, 83, 29, 91 and 15, respectively. During 23.4-23.6, the incidence of catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) was 0, 2.85, 6.12, 0 and 12.99 per 1000 urinary catheter days in CCU, RICU, SICU, NICU and CSICU, respectively. During 23.7-23.9, the incidence of CAUTI was 2.98, 6.13, 8.66, 0 and 0 per 1000 urinary catheter days in CCU, RICU, SICU, NICU and CSICU, respectively. Notably, hospitalisation days/indwelling urinary catheter days were positively correlated with the occurrence of CAUTI in each quarter (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was a positive correlation between urinary catheter indwelling time and the occurrence of UTI.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Catéteres de Permanencia , Infección Hospitalaria , Catéteres Urinarios , Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Anciano , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Correlación de Datos
16.
Ren Fail ; 46(2): 2376331, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39011577

RESUMEN

OBJECT: This study aims to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of various dressings in preventing exit-site infection (ESI) and peritonitis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCO), Sino Med, Wan Fang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from 1 January 1999 to 10 July 2023. The language restrictions were Chinese and English. Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and self-controlled trials were included in this study. We used ROB 2 tool to evaluate the quality of the included literature. Two authors independently extracted the data according to the Cochrane Handbook. A Frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using Stata17.0 according to PRISAMA with a random effects model. RESULTS: From 2092 potentially eligible studies, thirteen studies were selected for analysis, including nine randomized controlled studies, three quasi-experimental studies and one self-controlled trial. A total of 1229 patients were included to compare five types of exit site care dressings, named disinfection dressings, antibacterial dressings, non-antibacterial occlusive dressings, sterile gauze, and no-particular dressings. The outcome of prevention ESI is antibacterial dressings (SUCRA = 97.6) >non-antibacterial occlusive dressings (SUCRA = 68.3) >disinfection dressings (SUCRA = 50.6) >no-particular dressings (SUCRA = 23.9) >sterile gauze (SUCRA = 9.5). The antibacterial dressings were more effective than sterile gauze (OR = 0.13, 95%CI 0.04∼0.44), and no-particular dressing (OR = 0.18, 95%CI 0.07∼0.50) in preventing ESI; the non-antibacterial occlusive dressings were effective than sterile gauze (OR:0.30, 95%CI 0.16∼0.57). There is no statistical significance between no-particular dressings and other types of dressings in preventing the mature ESI. There is no statistical significance in the effectiveness of five types of dressings in preventing peritonitis. CONCLUSIONS: The no-particular dressings maybe more cost-effective for preventing mature ESI. None of the dressings was more effective than another in preventing peritonitis. Then, none of the different types of dressing is strongly recommended for preventing ESI or peritonitis.RegistrationCRD42022366756.


Asunto(s)
Vendajes , Metaanálisis en Red , Diálisis Peritoneal , Peritonitis , Humanos , Peritonitis/prevención & control , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/microbiología , Diálisis Peritoneal/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/microbiología
17.
BMC Nephrol ; 25(1): 242, 2024 Jul 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39075350

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Chiari network, a remnant of fetal anatomy, consists of a mesh-like structure within the right atrium. With advancements in cardiac interventions, complications associated with the Chiari network have increasingly been reported. However, there are few reports about guidewire or catheter entrapment in the Chiari network during the insertion of a dialysis catheter. CASE PRESENTATION: A 46-year-old male with end-stage renal disease was hospitalized and underwent a digital subtraction angiography-assisted catheterization of the right internal jugular vein tunnel-cuffed dialysis catheter. When the guide wire entered a depth of about 20 cm, it was difficult to advance, manifested as resistance when twisting the guide wire and inability to enter the inferior vena cava. After the peelable sheath was inserted, it was difficult to pull out the guide wire. After repeated attempts to rotate the guide wire, the guide wire was finally pulled out. A fibrous tissue was wrapped around the tip of the guide wire. Its length was 6 cm, with a smooth surface and tough texture. We considered that the tissue we pulled out was most likely a part of a Chiari network. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the potential for the Chiari network to complicate surgical procedures, including difficulty with guidewire and catheter manipulation. Attention should be paid to Chiari networks. Echocardiography can be used to identify the Chiari network. During the surgery, forcefully pulling out a stuck guidewire is not suggested, to avoid the risk of tearing the atrial wall and causing pericardial tamponade. An urgent consultation with ultrasound doctors and cardiac surgeons might be helpful in such cases.


Asunto(s)
Atrios Cardíacos , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal/instrumentación , Atrios Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos
19.
Cir Pediatr ; 37(3): 99-103, 2024 Jul 09.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39034873

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The indication of preoperative prophylaxis in the insertion of indwelling tunneled central venous catheters (ITCVC) has a low level of evidence. Our objective was to assess risk factors of ITCVC-related early bacteremia in oncological pediatric patients and to determine the need for preoperative prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A univariate and multivariate retrospective analysis of patients in whom an ITCVC was placed from January 2020 to July 2023, according to whether they had ITCVC-related early bacteremia (EB) in the first 30 postoperative days, was carried out. Demographic variables, leukopenia, neutropenia, use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and history of central venous catheter (CVC) or bacteremia were collected. Calculations were carried out using the IBM SSPS29® software. RESULTS: 176 patients with a mean age of 7.6 years (SD: 4.82) were analyzed. 7 EB cases were identified, with a greater frequency of neutropenia (p= 0.2), history of CVC in the 48 hours before insertion (p= 0.08), and intraoperative CVC (p= 0.04). The presence of intraoperative CVC increased the risk of EB 9-fold [OR: 9.4 (95%CI: 1.288-69.712) (p= 0.027)]. The lack of preoperative prophylaxis did not increase the risk of EB [OR: 2.2 (CI: 0.383-12.669) (p= 0.3)]. The association with other variables was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative presence of CVC was a risk factor of EB in our patients. Preoperative prophylaxis had no impact on the risk of EB, which in our view does not support its use. However, further studies with a larger sample size are required. Leukopenia or neutropenia at diagnosis were not associated with a greater prevalence of infection.


INTRODUCCION: La indicación de profilaxis preoperatoria en la colocación de catéteres venosos centrales tunelizados permanentes (CVCTP) tiene bajo nivel de evidencia. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar factores de riesgo de bacteriemia precoz asociada a CVCTP en pacientes pediátricos oncológicos y determinar la necesidad de profilaxis preoperatoria. MATERIAL Y METODOS: Realizamos un análisis retrospectivo univariante y multivariante de los pacientes con colocación de CVCTP entre enero 2020 y julio 2023, en función de si presentaron bacteriemia precoz (BP) relacionada con CVCTP en los primeros 30 días postoperatorios. Recogimos variables demográficas y otras como: leucopenia, neutropenia, uso de profilaxis antibiótica preoperatoria y antecedente de catéter venoso central (CVC) o bacteriemia. Los cálculos se realizaron mediante el software IBM SSPS29®. RESULTADOS: Analizamos 176 pacientes, con edad media de 7,6 años (SD 4,82). Identificamos 7 casos de BP, que presentaron mayor frecuencia de neutropenia (p=  0,2) y antecedente de CVC las 48h previas a la colocación (p=  0,08) y CVC intraoperatorio (p=  0,04). La presencia de CVC intraoperatorio aumentó 9 veces el riesgo de BP [OR 9,4 (IC 95% de 1,288-69,712) (p=  0,027)]. La falta de profilaxis prequirúrgica no aumentó el riesgo de BP [OR 2,2 (IC 0,383-12,669) (p=  0,3)]. La relación con otras variables no fue significativa. CONCLUSIONES: La presencia intraoperatoria de CVC fue factor de riesgo de BP en nuestros pacientes. La profilaxis preoperatoria no influyó sobre el riesgo de BP, por lo que creemos que su empleo no está justificado, aunque se necesitarían más estudios con mayor tamaño muestral. La leucopenia o neutropenia al momento diagnóstico no se relacionaron con mayor prevalencia de infección.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Bacteriemia , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Bacteriemia/etiología , Niño , Femenino , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Preescolar , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Adolescente , Neoplasias/cirugía , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neutropenia , Lactante
20.
Urol Pract ; 11(5): 884-891, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38913619

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Prolonged indwelling catheter use is a known risk factor for catheter-associated UTIs (CAUTIs). We sought to reduce catheter use by creating and implementing a trial of void (TOV) algorithm to standardize indwelling Foley catheter removal in surgical patients. METHODS: We partnered with the Departments of General Surgery and Nursing to develop an evidence-based TOV algorithm for a step-down unit at a large urban teaching hospital. Our cohort included patients treated with intra-abdominal, thoracic, vascular, urologic, and gynecologic surgeries. The primary outcome was mean cumulative indwelling urethral catheter patient-days. For example, if 2 patients had catheters for 3 and 7 days, respectively, then cumulative catheter days would be 10. We analyzed changes in catheter use 90 days before and after algorithm implementation. RESULTS: The mean number of hospitalized patient-days before and after algorithm introduction did not differ (32.2 vs 32.0, P = .60). After implementation, mean cumulative catheter patient-days decreased (14.8 vs 9.9, P < .01), as did mean daily number of patients with catheters on the unit (3.7 vs 3.1, P = .02). There was 1 CAUTI before and after algorithm implementation, the latter deemed associated with algorithm nonadherence. Catheter use in a surgical floor control group where the algorithm was not implemented did not differ for any outcome over the same time period (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary approach to standardize catheter care with a TOV algorithm is feasible and effective in reducing catheter use. Further research is needed to determine its impact on CAUTI rate.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Catéteres de Permanencia , Cateterismo Urinario , Catéteres Urinarios , Humanos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Urinario/instrumentación , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Anciano , Remoción de Dispositivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA