RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Root caries are prevalent issues that affect dental health, particularly among elderly individuals with exposed root surfaces. Fluoride therapy has shown effectiveness in preventing root caries, but limited studies have addressed its cost-effectiveness in elderly persons population. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a fluoride treatment program for preventing root caries in elderly persons within the context of Chinese public healthcare. METHODS: A Markov simulation model was adopted for the cost-effectiveness analysis in a hypothetical scenario from a healthcare system perspective. A 60-year-old subject with 23 teeth was simulated for 20 years. A 5% sodium fluoride varnish treatment was compared with no preventive intervention in terms of effectiveness and cost. Tooth years free of root caries were set as the effect. Transition probabilities were estimated from the data of a community-based cohort and published studies, and costs were based on documents published by the government. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to evaluate cost-effectiveness. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of data uncertainty. RESULTS: Fluoride treatment was more effective (with a difference of 10.20 root caries-free tooth years) but also more costly (with a difference of ¥1636.22). The ICER was ¥160.35 per root caries-free tooth year gained. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the risk ratio of root caries in the fluoride treatment group influenced the result most. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, fluoride treatment was cost-effective in 70.5% of the simulated cases. CONCLUSIONS: Regular 5% sodium fluoride varnish application was cost-effective for preventing root caries in the elderly persons in most scenarios with the consideration of data uncertainty, but to a limited extent. Improved public dental health awareness may reduce the incremental cost and make the intervention more cost-effective. Overall, the study shed light on the economic viability and impact of such preventive interventions, providing a scientific basis for dental care policies and healthcare resource allocation.
Asunto(s)
Cariostáticos , Fluoruros Tópicos , Caries Radicular , Fluoruro de Sodio , Anciano , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cariostáticos/economía , Cariostáticos/uso terapéutico , China , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Fluoruros Tópicos/uso terapéutico , Fluoruros Tópicos/economía , Cadenas de Markov , Caries Radicular/prevención & control , Caries Radicular/economía , Fluoruro de Sodio/economía , Fluoruro de Sodio/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The growing geriatric population is facing numerous economic challenges and oral health changes. This study explores the relationship between affordability of dental care and untreated root caries among older American adults, and whether that relationship is independent of ethnicity and socioeconomic factors. Data from 1776 adults (65 years or older) who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analyzed. The association between affordability of dental care and untreated root caries was assessed using logistic regression models. Findings indicated that untreated root caries occurred in 42.5% of those who could not afford dental care, and 14% of those who could afford dental care. Inability to afford dental care remained a statistically significant predictor of untreated root caries in the fully adjusted regression model (odds ratio 2.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.78, 4.39). Other statistically significant predictors were gender (male), infrequent dental visits, and current smoking. The study concludes that the inability to afford dental care was the strongest predictor of untreated root caries among older Americans. The findings highlight the problems with access to and use of much needed dental services by older adults. Policy reform should facilitate access to oral healthcare by providing an alternative coverage for dental care, or by alleviating the financial barrier imposed on older adults.
Asunto(s)
Atención Odontológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Caries Dental/etnología , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Bucal/etnología , Caries Radicular/etnología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Atención Odontológica/economía , Caries Dental/economía , Caries Dental/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Americanos Mexicanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Caries Radicular/economía , Caries Radicular/terapia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
AIMS: Distal Cervical Caries (DCC) of the mandibular second molar (Md2M) is primarily related to retained mesially impacted third molars (Md3M). Treatment of this condition indicates the removal of the Md3M and the restoration of the Md2M and, on occasions, the loss of the Md2M. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, treatment outcomes for patients, and calculate costs related to Md2M DCC. METHODS: A review of 121 patients who had Md3M removed due to Md2M DCC was undertaken to determine the treatment outcomes for patients. The number of patients affected by DCC of Md2M was calculated from the incidence of DCC (15%) in a cohort of patients requiring Md3M removal (1100) and the annual number of patients undergoing third molar surgery in England. Direct costs were calculated using NHS and independent treatment tariffs and indirect costs from Office of National Statistics (ONS). RESULTS: It is estimated that 152,000 patients in England undergo third molar removal on an annual basis. Approximately 27,000 Md3M are removed annually due to DCC of the Md2M; costing £27 m to treat with additional costs of £28 m if dental implant replacement of the Md2M is included. Total cost for treating Md2M DCC: £55 m/annum. CONCLUSIONS: Treating Md2M DCC and its consequences is expensive for healthcare funders such as the NHS and for patients. Md2M DCC is avoidable if patients who are at risk have prophylactic Md3M removal. This would offer potential and substantial savings in the financial cost of treating an otherwise avoidable disease.
Asunto(s)
Diente Molar/cirugía , Caries Radicular/epidemiología , Diente Impactado/cirugía , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Mandíbula , Tercer Molar/cirugía , Caries Radicular/economía , Caries Radicular/etiología , Caries Radicular/cirugía , Diente Impactado/complicaciones , Diente Impactado/economíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: With a growing number of individuals retaining their teeth lifelong, often with periodontitis-induced root surface exposure, there is the need for cost-effective management strategies for root caries lesions. The present study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of root caries preventive treatments. METHODS: Patients were simulated over 10 years using a Markov model. Four treatments were compared: No treatment, daily 225-800ppm fluoride rinses, chlorhexidine (CHX) varnish (2×/year), silver diamine fluoride (SDF) varnish (2×/year). Data from a systematic review were submitted to network meta-analysis for inferring relative efficacies of treatments. The health outcome was years of teeth being free of root caries. A mixed public-private payer perspective within 2016 German healthcare was taken, with costs being estimated from fee item catalogues or based on market prices. Populations with different numbers of teeth and tooth-level risks were modelled. Monte-Carlo microsimulations, univariate- and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In populations with 16 teeth at risk and low tooth-level risk for root caries, providing no preventive treatment was least costly, but also least effective (130 Euro, 144 years). SDF ranked next, being more costly (180 Euro), but also more effective (151 years). Payers willing to invest 8.30 Euro per root caries-free tooth-year found SDF most cost-effective. CHX varnish and fluoride rinse were not cost-effective. In populations with more teeth and high tooth-level risk, SDF was the most effective and least costly option. CONCLUSIONS: Root caries preventive treatments (like SDF) are effective and might even be cost-saving in high risk populations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Application of SDF can be recommended as a cost-saving treatment for prevention of root caries in patients with high risk of root caries.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Preventiva/economía , Caries Radicular/economía , Caries Radicular/prevención & control , Anciano , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Atención a la Salud/economía , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Fluoruros/uso terapéutico , Fluoruros Tópicos/uso terapéutico , Alemania , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Antisépticos Bucales/uso terapéutico , Metaanálisis en Red , Salud Bucal/economía , Fosfatos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Amonio Cuaternario/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Compuestos de Plata , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Caries Dental/prevención & control , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Cariostáticos/uso terapéutico , Costo de Enfermedad , Caries Dental/economía , Caries Dental/etiología , Conducta Alimentaria , Fluoruros Tópicos/uso terapéutico , Salud Global , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Caries Radicular/economía , Caries Radicular/etiología , Caries Radicular/prevención & control , Clase SocialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess retrospectively the cumulative costs for the long-term oral rehabilitation of patients with birth defects affecting the development of teeth. METHODS: Patients with birth defects who had received fixed reconstructions on teeth and/or implants > or =5 years ago were asked to participate in a comprehensive clinical, radiographic and economic evaluation. RESULTS: From the 45 patients included, 18 were cases with a cleft lip and palate, five had amelogenesis/dentinogenesis imperfecta and 22 were cases with hypodontia/oligodontia. The initial costs for the first oral rehabilitation (before the age of 20) had been covered by the Swiss Insurance for Disability. The costs for the initial rehabilitation of the 45 cases amounted to 407,584 CHF (39% for laboratory fees). Linear regression analyses for the initial treatment costs per replaced tooth revealed the formula 731 CHF+(811 CHF x units) on teeth and 3369 CHF+(1183 CHF x units) for reconstructions on implants (P<.001). Fifty-eight percent of the patients with tooth-supported reconstructions remained free from failures/complications (median observation 15.7 years). Forty-seven percent of the patients with implant-supported reconstructions remained free from failures/complications (median observation 8 years). The long-term cumulative treatment costs for implant cases, however, were not statistically significantly different compared with cases reconstructed with tooth-supported fixed reconstructions. Twenty-seven percent of the initial treatment costs were needed to cover supportive periodontal therapy as well as the treatment of technical/biological complications and failures. CONCLUSION: Insurance companies should accept to cover implant-supported reconstructions because there is no need to prepare healthy teeth, fewer tooth units need to be replaced and the cumulative long-term costs seem to be similar compared with cases restored on teeth.