RESUMEN
Importance: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT) are the most treatable causes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Yet, it remains unknown if defibrillator pad position, placement in the anterior-posterior (AP) or anterior-lateral (AL) locations, impacts patient outcomes in VF or pVT OHCA. Objective: To determine the association between initial defibrillator pad placement position and OHCA outcomes for patients presenting with VF or pVT. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included patients with OHCA and VF or pVT treated by a single North American emergency medical services (EMS) agency from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2023. The study included patients with OHCA treated by a large suburban fire-based EMS agency that covers a population of 550â¯000. Consecutive patients with an initial EMS-assessed rhythm of VF or pVT receiving EMS defibrillation were included. Pediatric patients (younger than 18 years), interfacility transfers, arrests of obvious traumatic etiology, and patients with preexisting do-not-resuscitate status were excluded. Exposure: AP or AL pad placement. Main Outcomes and Measures: Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at any time with secondary outcomes of pulses present at emergency department (ED) arrival, survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, and functional survival at hospital discharge (cerebral performance category score of 2 or less). Measures included adjusted odds ratios (aOR), multivariable logistic regressions, and Fine-Gray competing risks regression. Results: A total of 255 patients with OHCA were included (median [IQR] age, 66 [55-74] years; 63 females [24.7%]), with initial pad positioning documented as either AP (158 patients [62.0%]; median [IQR] age, 65 [54-74] years; 37 females [23.4%]) or AL (97 patients [38.0%]; median [IQR] age, 66 [57-74] years; 26 females [26.8%]). Patients with AP placement had higher adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of ROSC at any time (aOR, 2.64 [95% CI, 1.50-4.65]), but not significantly different odds of pulses present at ED arrival (1.34 [95% CI, 0.78-2.30]), survival to hospital admission (1.41 [0.82-2.43]), survival to hospital discharge (1.55 [95% CI, 0.83-2.90]), or functional survival at hospital discharge (1.86 [95% CI, 0.98-3.51]). Competing risk analysis found significantly greater cumulative incidence of ROSC among those at risk with initial AP placement compared with AL (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.23-2.67]; P = .003). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with OHCA and VF or pVT, AP defibrillator pad placement was associated with higher ROSC compared with AL placement.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Humanos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Desfibriladores/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cardioversión Eléctrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodosAsunto(s)
Muerte Súbita Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantables , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Masculino , Femenino , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Riesgo , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
AIMS: Recommendations on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) are based on less robust evidence than those in sinus rhythm (SR). We aimed to assess the efficacy of CRT upgrade in the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade trial population by their baseline rhythm. METHODS AND RESULTS: Heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and previously implanted pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and ≥20% right ventricular (RV) pacing burden were randomized to CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D) upgrade (n = 215) or ICD (n = 145). Primary [HF hospitalization (HFH), all-cause mortality, or <15% reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume] and secondary outcomes were investigated. At enrolment, 131 (36%) patients had AF, who had an increased risk for HFH as compared with those with SR [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.99; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-7.13; P = 0.013]. The effect of CRT-D upgrade was similar in patients with AF as in those with SR [AF adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.06; 95% CI 0.02-0.17; P < 0.001; SR aOR 0.13; 95% CI 0.07-0.27; P < 0.001; interaction P = 0.29] during the mean follow-up time of 12.4 months. Also, it decreased the risk of HFH or all-cause mortality (aHR 0.33; 95% CI 0.16-0.70; P = 0.003; interaction P = 0.17) and improved the echocardiographic response (left ventricular end-diastolic volume difference -49.21 mL; 95% CI -69.10 to -29.32; P < 0.001; interaction P = 0.21). CONCLUSION: In HFrEF patients with AF and PM/ICD with high RV pacing burden, CRT-D upgrade decreased the risk of HFH and improved reverse remodelling when compared with ICD, similar to that seen in patients in SR.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantables , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Volumen Sistólico , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/métodos , Anciano , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Función Ventricular Derecha , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Dispositivos de Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Factores de Riesgo , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) complications present significant challenges in clinical practice, especially in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. Common adverse events include infection, lead malfunction, and device migration. Twiddler's Syndrome, a rare but serious CIED complication characterised by patient manipulation causing lead displacement and device malfunction, is often underreported. The literature consists mainly of case reports and small series, providing limited guidance on prevention and management. As CIEDs are critical for managing cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure, understanding and addressing Twiddler's Syndrome is essential. This case report aims to contribute to the literature by detailing a case of Twiddler's Syndrome, emphasising the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for optimal management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 59-year-old male presented with discomfort around his implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) site and the sternal area over the past two days. He denied pain, dyspnoea, or dizziness. Clinical examination revealed a normal heart rhythm and no peripheral pulse deficit. Ultrasound revealed a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The atrial lead was not visible, and the shock coil was misplaced. ICD interrogation showed inappropriate shocks due to sensing artifacts and exit block in both leads, with no arrhythmias detected. An X-ray confirmed lead dislodgement and significant entanglement in the pocket. The patient was diagnosed with Twiddler's Syndrome and scheduled for surgical revision. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), characterised by left ventricular dilatation and dysfunction, accounts for a significant proportion of systolic heart failure cases. Despite advancements in heart failure management, DCM patients remain at high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD), making ICD implantation crucial. However, CIED placement carries risks of complications, including Twiddler's Syndrome. This condition can lead to lead dislodgement and device malfunction, resulting in inappropriate shocks and potential patient harm. In this case, a single-session extraction and re-implantation were successfully performed using a multidisciplinary approach, emphasising the importance of comprehensive management strategies to address such complications effectively. Regular follow-up showed no adverse events, highlighting the procedure's success and the potential benefits of using advanced antimicrobial adjuncts to prevent infections. This case underscores the need for awareness and standardised protocols for managing Twiddler's Syndrome to improve patient outcomes in the growing population of CIED recipients.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Remoción de Dispositivos , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Humanos , Masculino , Desfibriladores Implantables/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Falla de EquipoRESUMEN
AIMS: Wearable cardioverter-defibrillators (WCDs) are indicated in patients at risk of sudden cardiac arrest who are not immediate candidates for implantable defibrillator therapy. Limitations of existing WCDs include poor compliance and high false alarm rates. The Jewel is a novel patch-WCD (P-WCD) that addresses these limitations with an adhesive-based design for near-continuous wear and a machine learning algorithm designed to minimize inappropriate detections. This was a first-in-human study of the Jewel P-WCD conducted in an electrophysiology (EP) lab to determine the safety and effectiveness of the device in terminating ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) with a single shock. The aim was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of terminating VT/VF with a single shock using the Jewel P-WCD. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a first-in-human, prospective, single-arm, single-centre study in patients scheduled for an EP procedure in which VT/VF was expected to either spontaneously occur or be induced. The Jewel P-WCD was placed on consented patients; upon confirmation of VT/VF, a single shock (150 J) was delivered via the device. A group sequential design and Pocock alpha spending function was used to measure the observed proportion of successful VT/VF single-shock terminations. The endpoint was achieved if the lower confidence limit exceeded the performance goal of 62%, using a one-sided lower 97.4% exact confidence bound. Of 18 eligible subjects, 16 (88.9%, 97.4% confidence bound: 65.4%) were successfully defibrillated with a single shock, exceeding the primary endpoint performance goal with no adverse events. CONCLUSION: This first-in-human evaluation of the Jewel P-WCD demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of terminating VT/VF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT05490459.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Taquicardia Ventricular , Fibrilación Ventricular , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia , Fibrilación Ventricular/diagnóstico , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Diseño de Equipo , Adulto , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Data on the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with severe heart failure symptoms are limited. We investigated the relative effects of CRT in patients with ambulatory New York Heart Association (NYHA) IV versus III functional class at the time of device implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this meta-analysis, we pooled patient-level data from the MIRACLE (Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation), MIRACLE-ICD (Multicenter InSync Implantable Cardioversion Defibrillation Randomized Clinical Evaluation), and COMPANION (Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure) trials. Outcomes evaluated were time to the composite end point of the first heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality, and time to all-cause mortality alone. The association between CRT and outcomes was evaluated using a Bayesian hierarchical Weibull survival regression model. We assessed if this association differed between NYHA III and IV groups by adding an interaction term between CRT and NYHA class as a random effect. A sensitivity analysis was performed by including data from RAFT (Resynchronization-Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure). Our pooled analysis included 2309 patients. Overall, CRT was associated with a longer time to heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.79 [95% credible interval [CI], 0.64-0.99]; posterior probability or P=0.044), with a similar association with time to all-cause mortality (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.59-1.03]; P=0.083). Associations of CRT with outcomes were not significantly different for those in NYHA III and IV classes (ratio of aHR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.30-1.27]; P=0.23 for heart failure hospitalization/mortality; ratio of aHR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.35-1.34]; P=0.27 for all-cause mortality alone). The sensitivity analysis, including RAFT data, did not show a significant relative CRT benefit between NYHA III and IV classes. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was no significant difference in the association of CRT with either outcome for patients in NYHA functional class III compared with functional class IV.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Femenino , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Masculino , Cardioversión Eléctrica/mortalidad , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Teorema de BayesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Shock-reduction implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming (SRP) was associated with fewer therapies and improved survival in randomized controlled trials, but real-world studies investigating SRP and associated outcomes are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: The BIOTRONIK CERTITUDE registry was linked with the Medicare database. We included all patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implanted between August 22, 2012 and September 30, 2021 in the United States. SRP was defined as programming to either a therapy rate cutoff ≥188 beats per minute or number of intervals to detection ≥30/40 for treatment. Among 6781 patients (mean 74±9 years; 27% women), 3393 (50%) had SRP. Older age, secondary prevention indication, and device implantation in the southern or western United States were associated with lower use of SRP. The cumulative incidence rate of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks was lower in the SRP group (5.1% shocks/patient year) compared with the non-SRP group (7.2% shocks/patient year) (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.73-0.96]; P=0.005). Over a median follow-up of 2.9 years, 739 deaths occurred in the SRP group and 822 deaths occurred in the non-SRP group (adjusted HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.88-1.07]; P=0.569). SRP was associated with a lower all-cause mortality among patients without ischemic heart disease compared with patients with ischemic heart disease (adjusted HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.48-0.87] versus adjusted HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.92-1.14]; Pinteraction=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of SRP is low in real-world clinical practice. Age, clinical variables, and geographic factors are associated with use of SRP. In this study, SRP-associated decrease in mortality was limited to patients without ischemic heart disease.
Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/mortalidad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiología , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Medicare , Factores de Tiempo , Medición de RiesgoAsunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Confianza , Humanos , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The VIVID (Videos for Addressing Racial Disparities in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy via Innovative Designs) study was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a video-based decision support tool in enhancing informed consent for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation among Black patients who met guideline criteria for primary prevention ICDs. Within the broader VIVID randomized trial, a qualitative investigation was conducted to elucidate the decisional factors among Black individuals considering ICD implantation for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest. METHODS: Between October 2016 and July 2019, in-depth interviews were conducted at 2 time points from randomization, ≈7 days (time interval for the decision) and at 90 days; the time interval for determining ICD implantation. Interview findings were categorized by randomized groups, those assigned to 1 of the 2 encounter-based video decision support tools or standard care (without video). Interview participants were purposefully selected to ensure diversity across gender, age, educational background, research site, and randomization group; participants were sampled from 14 academic and community-based electrophysiology clinics in the United States. Data analysis employed applied thematic analysis techniques. RESULTS: A diverse sample of Black individuals were interviewed at 1 week (n=59; female, 37.3%) and 90 days (n=48; female, 39.6%). The primary factors influencing the decisions of Black individuals considering a primary prevention ICD implantation were (1) their clinicians' recommendations for ICD implantation; (2) their perception of their cardiac health status; and (3) a desire to prolong their lives for the sake of their families. CONCLUSIONS: These findings offer valuable insights that may guide clinicians in their communication with Black patients during shared decision-making encounters related to ICD implantation.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Prevención Primaria , Investigación Cualitativa , Grabación en Video , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/etnología , Anciano , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud/etnología , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Participación del Paciente , Factores Raciales , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Estados Unidos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Entrevistas como Asunto , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Consentimiento Informado , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Educación del Paciente como AsuntoRESUMEN
AIMS: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) have become established in preventing sudden cardiac death, with some advantages over transvenous defibrillator systems, including a lower incidence of lead failures. Despite technological advancements, S-ICD carriers may suffer from significant complications, such as premature battery depletion (PBD), that led to an advisory for nearly 40 000 patients. This multicentre study evaluated the incidence of PBD in a large set of S-ICD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from patients implanted with S-ICD models A209 and A219 between October 2012 and July 2023 across nine centres in Europe and the USA were reviewed. Incidence and implications of PBD, defined as clinically observed sudden drop in battery longevity, were analysed and compared to PBD with the definition of battery depletion within 60 months. Prospectively collected clinical data were obtained retrospectively from medical records, device telemetry, and manufacturer reports. This registry is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05713708). Of the 1112 S-ICD devices analysed, 547 (49.2%) were equipped with a potentially affected capacitor linked to PBD occurrence, currently under Food and Drug Administration advisory. The median follow-up time for all patients was 46 [inter-quartile range (IQR) 24-63] months. Clinically suspected PBD was observed in 159 (29.1%) of cases, with a median time to generator removal or replacement of 65 (IQR 55-72) months, indicative of significant deviations from expected battery lifespan. Manufacturer confirmation of PBD was made in 91.7% of devices returned for analysis. No cases of PBD were observed in devices that were not under advisory. CONCLUSION: This manufacturer-independent analysis highlights a notable incidence of PBD in patients equipped with S-ICD models under advisory, and the rate of PBD in this study corresponds to the rate currently estimated by the manufacturer. To the best of our knowledge, this provides the largest contemporary peer-reviewed study cohort investigating the actual incidence of PBD in S-ICD patients. These findings emphasize the importance of post-market registries in collaboration between clinicians and the manufacturer to optimize safety and efficacy in S-ICD treatment.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Suministros de Energía Eléctrica , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Falla de Equipo/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo/estadística & datos numéricos , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death with type 2 diabetes; however, their effect on arrhythmias is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of empagliflozin on ventricular arrhythmias in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A total of 150 patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (ICD/CRT-D) were randomized to once-daily empagliflozin or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the number of ventricular arrhythmias from the 24 weeks before to the 24 weeks during treatment. Secondary endpoints included the change in the number of appropriate device discharges and other values. RESULTS: In the empagliflozin group, the number of ventricular arrhythmias recorded by ICD/CRT-D decreased by 1.69 during treatment compared to before treatment, while in the placebo group, the number increased by 1.79. The coefficient for the between-group difference was - 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 1.29 to - 0.86; P < 0.001). The change in the number of appropriate device discharges during and before treatment was 0.06 in the empagliflozin group and 0.27 in the placebo group, with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.204). Empagliflozin was associated with an increase in blood ketones and hematocrit and a decrease in blood brain natriuretic peptide and body weight. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes treated with ICD/CRT-D, empagliflozin reduces the number of ventricular arrhythmias compared with placebo. Trial registration jRCTs031180120.
Asunto(s)
Compuestos de Bencidrilo , Desfibriladores Implantables , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Glucósidos , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2 , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucósidos/uso terapéutico , Glucósidos/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/efectos adversos , Masculino , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/efectos adversos , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Japón , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Glucemia/metabolismo , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anterior-posterior electrode placement is preferred in electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. However, the optimal anterior-posterior electrode position in relation to the heart is not studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a prospective observational study on patients presenting for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Electrodes were placed in the anterior-posterior position and shock was delivered in a step-up approach (100 Jâ200 Jâ360 J). Fluoroscopic images were obtained, and distances were measured from points A, midanterior electrode; and B, midposterior electrode, to midpoint of the cardiac silhouette. Patients requiring one 100 J shock for cardioversion success (group I) were compared with those requiring >1 shock/100 J (group II). Logistic regression was used to determine the impact of electrode distance on low energy (100 J) cardioversion success. Computed tomography scans from this cohort were analyzed for anatomic landmark correlation to the cardiac silhouette. Of the 87 patients included, 54 (62%) comprised group I and 33 (38%) group II. Group I had significantly lower distances from the mid-cardiac silhouette to points A (5.0±2.4 versus 7.4±3.3 cm; P<0.001) and B (7.3±3.0 versus 10.0±3.8 cm; P=0.002) compared with group II. On multivariate analysis, higher distances from the mid-cardiac silhouette to point A (odds ratio, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.07-1.70]; P=0.01) and B (odds rsatio, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.05-1.50]; P=0.01) were independent predictors of low energy (100 J) cardioversion failure. Based on review of computed tomography scans, we suggest that the xiphoid process may be an easy landmark to guide proximity to the myocardium. CONCLUSIONS: In anterior-posterior electrode placement, closer proximity to the cardiac silhouette predicts successful 100 J cardioversion irrespective of clinical factors.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Desfibriladores Implantables , Fluoroscopía , Modelos LogísticosRESUMEN
AIMS: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) offer potentially distinct advantages over transvenous defibrillator systems. Recent randomized trials showed significantly lower lead failure rates than transvenous ICD. Still, S-ICDs remain associated with the risk of inappropriate shocks (IAS). While previous studies have reported varying causes of IAS, this study explores a rare cause of IAS, referred to as 'sense-B-noise.' It was recently described in case series, but its incidence has not been studied in a large cohort of S-ICD patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed data from patients implanted with S-ICD models 1010, A209, and A219 between October 2009 and July 2023 across nine centres in Europe and the USA. The analysis concentrated on determining the incidence and understanding the implications of sense-B-noise events. Sense-B-noise represents a rare manifestation of distinct electrogram abnormalities within the primary and alternate sensing vectors. Data were collected from medical records, device telemetry, and manufacturer reports for investigation. This registry is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05713708). Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices of the 1158 patients were analysed. The median follow-up time for all patients was 46 (IQR 23-64) months. In 107 patients (9.2%) ≥1 IAS was observed during follow-up. Sense-B-noise failure was diagnosed in six (0.5 and 5.6% of all IAS) patients, in all patients, the diagnosis was made after an IAS episode. Median lead dwell time in the affected patients was 23 (2-70) months. To resolve the sense-B-noise defect, in three patients reprogramming to the secondary vector was undertaken, and two patients underwent system removal with subsequent S-ICD reimplantation due to low amplitude in the secondary vector. In one patient, the secondary vector was initially programmed, and subsequently, an S-ICD system exchange was performed due to T-wave-oversensing IAS episodes. CONCLUSION: This multicentre analysis' findings shed light on a rare but clinically highly significant adverse event in S-ICD therapy. To our knowledge, we provide the first systematic multicentre analysis investigating the incidence of sense-B-noise. Due to being difficult to diagnose and limited options for resolution, management of sense-B-noise is challenging. Complete system exchange may be the only option for some patients. Educating healthcare providers involved in S-ICD patient care is crucial for ensuring accurate diagnosis and effective management of sense-B-noise issues.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incidencia , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Anciano , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Falla de Equipo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoAsunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Desfibriladores Implantables/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/tendencias , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a relevant event with a fatal outcome in most cases. Basic life support-defibrillator (BLSD) training is central to rescuing a patient in arrest and ensuring that the patient has a better chance of returning to spontaneous circulation. Despite this, BLSD training is not mandatory for newly licensed physicians. Our study aims to evaluate the preparedness of newly qualified doctors to manage an OHCA and the impact of BLSD training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We tested 120 newly qualified doctors, members of the 'Italian Society of Medicine and Scientific Divulgation' network, evaluating their practical and theoretical knowledge in managing an OHCA before and after a BLSD training course conducted according to the American Heart Association guidelines. RESULTS: Fifty-nine physicians (49.2%) had an adequate background of the theoretical basis of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); 37 (30.8%) were able to perform effective CPR on a mannequin, but only 19 (15.8%) were able to perform effective CPR with adequate depth and frequency of compressions. After the BLSD training course, 111 physicians (92.5%) were able to perform effective and quality CPR on a mannequin with feedback. CONCLUSION: In Italy, BLSD training for physicians is not mandatory, and newly licensed physicians showed good knowledge of the theoretical basis of CPR, but few of them performed compressions of adequate depth and frequency. These results should guide future educational policy decisions in Italian academies.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Competencia Clínica , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Humanos , Italia , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/educación , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Desfibriladores , Adulto , Médicos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
AIMS: Previous studies have indicated a poorer survival among women following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but the mechanisms explaining this difference remain largely uncertain.This study aimed to assess the survival after OHCA among women and men and explore the role of potential mediators, such as resuscitation characteristics, prior comorbidity, and socioeconomic factors. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a population-based cohort study including emergency medical service-treated OHCA reported to the Swedish Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in 2010-2020, linked to nationwide Swedish healthcare registries. The relative risks (RR) of 30-day survival were compared among women and men, and a mediation analysis was performed to investigate the importance of potential mediators. Total of 43 226 OHCAs were included, of which 14 249 (33.0%) were women. Women were older and had a lower proportion of shockable initial rhythm. The crude 30-day survival among women was 6.2% compared to 10.7% for men [RR 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.54-0.62]. Stepwise adjustment for shockable initial rhythm attenuated the association to RR 0.85 (95% CI = 0.79-0.91). Further adjustments for age and resuscitation factors attenuated the survival difference to null (RR 0.98; 95% CI = 0.92-1.05). Mediation analysis showed that shockable initial rhythm explained â¼50% of the negative association of female sex on survival. Older age and lower disposable income were the second and third most important variables, respectively. CONCLUSION: Women have a lower crude 30-day survival following OHCA compared to men. The poor prognosis is largely explained by a lower proportion of shockable initial rhythm, older age at presentation, and lower income.