RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus open thoracotomy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were evaluated with a focus on mediastinal lymph node dissection, postoperative recovery, and longterm outcomes including survival rates and disease-free intervals. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 228 NSCLC patients treated at the Institute of Oncology Bucharest from 2016 to 2022. Both VATS and open surgical approaches were compared, with variables including demographic data, comorbidities, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications meticulously recorded. Statistical significance was assessed using chi-square and independent samples t-tests. Results: Among the findings, VATS demonstrated significantly better two-year progression-free survival rates for patients in early stages (Stages 1-3) of NSCLC compared to open surgery, with p-values 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. In contrast, no significant difference was observed in Stage 4. Furthermore, VATS resulted in shorter operative times (mean 299 vs. 347 minutes, p 0.001), less estimated blood loss (98.68 mL vs. 160.88 mL, p 0.001), reduced chest tube duration (5.78 days vs. 12.17 days, p 0.001), and decreased hospital stays (12.0 days vs. 27.7 days, p 0.001). Conclusions: VATS is associated with improved long-term disease-free survival for early-stage NSCLC and more favorable short-term surgical outcomes, highlighting its advantages over open thoracotomy. Despite its benefits, VATS did not significantly reduce postoperative complications compared to open surgery.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tempo Operativo , Neumonectomía , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Toracotomía , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Toracotomía/métodos , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neumonectomía/métodos , Neumonectomía/mortalidad , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto , Rumanía/epidemiología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study has a purpose to investigate the side effects of three EGFR-TKIs targeted therapeutic agents (gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib) and all-cause mortality in patients with metastatic lung cancer. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study. We selected all patients with newly diagnosed metastatic lung cancer between January and November 2019. Main exposure was daytime versus nighttime use of targeted EGFR TKIs. The study outcome was a symptom change using the mobile application, and all-cause mortality between January 2019 and March 2023. RESULTS: Among the 87 study participants, 35 (40%) took their medication at night. Among the 87 study participants, 35 (40%) took their medication at night. At 6 weeks of treatment, acne (1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09, 1.64; p for interaction = 0.04) and dry skin (1.35; 95% CI 1.09, 1.61, p for interaction = 0.01) in the day group showed a much increase from baseline compared to the night group. In contrast, the night group reported greater reductions in lung cancer-related symptoms from baseline compared to the day. During follow-up (median 43 months), the night group had a lower risk of all-cause death than the day group, especially in younger patients (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.34; 95% CI 0.13, 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: The group taking EGFR-TKIs at night experienced fewer side effects and had longer overall survival compared to the day group. Clinicians should consider recommending that lung cancer patients take their once-daily oral anticancer drugs in the evening rather than the morning to improve treatment outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Receptores ErbB , Clorhidrato de Erlotinib , Gefitinib , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Gefitinib/administración & dosificación , Gefitinib/uso terapéutico , Gefitinib/farmacología , Clorhidrato de Erlotinib/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Erlotinib/farmacología , Clorhidrato de Erlotinib/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Afatinib/administración & dosificación , Afatinib/uso terapéutico , Afatinib/farmacología , Estudios de Cohortes , Anciano de 80 o más Años , AdultoRESUMEN
Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related pneumonitis (ICI-P) risk factors. However, the relationship between imaging patterns and immunotherapy outcomes, and treatment strategies remain unclear in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and ILAs. We retrospectively evaluated patients with ILAs-complicated NSCLC who received ICI therapy. ILAs were subcategorized as non-subpleural, subpleural non-fibrotic, and subpleural fibrotic (SF) based on the 2020 position paper by the Fleischner Society. We investigated ICI-P incidence, ICI-P risk factors, lung cancer prognosis, and ILAs radiological progression. Of the 481 ICI-treated patients, 79 (16.4%) had ILAs (45 non-SF and 34 SF). The ICI-P cumulative incidence (hazard ratio, 4.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.90-10.98; p = 0.001) and any grade and grade ≥ 3 ICI-P incidences were higher in patients with SF-ILAs than in those with non-SF-ILAs (all grades: 7/45 [15.6%)] vs. 18/34 [52.9%]; p < 0.001; grade ≥ 3: 1/45 [2.2%] vs. 10/34 [29.4%]; p = 0.001). According to multivariate analysis, SF-ILAs independently predicted ICI-P (odds ratio, 5.35; 95% CI 1.62-17.61; p = 0.006). Patients with SF-ILAs had shorter progression-free and overall survival and higher ICI-P-related respiratory failure death rates than those with non-SF-ILAs. Approximately 2.5 times more patients with SF-ILAs showed progression by the 2-year follow-up than those with non-SF-ILAs. SF-ILAs is an independent strong predictor of ICI-P development in patients with NSCLC, may increase ICI-P severity, worsen prognosis, and accelerate ILAs progression. ILAs subcategorization is an important treatment strategy for patients with lung cancer treated with ICIs.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/etiología , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment of brain metastases (BMs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, especially those with non-sensitive genetic mutations, is hindered by limited drug delivery through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This retrospective study explores the efficacy of systemic treatments during brain metastasis to radiotherapy evaluation window in improving patient survival. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 209 NSCLC patients with non-sensitive mutations and BMs, treated between 2016 and 2023 at two tertiary medical centers (Chongqing University Cancer Hospital and Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital). The patients were divided into three groups, namely chemotherapy alone (C; n = 95), chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (C + I; n = 62), and chemotherapy with ICIs and antiangiogenic therapy (A) (C + I + A; n = 52). Statistical analyses were performed using R software, version 4.3.3. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test, and survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared via the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess factors associated with overall survival (OS). Bayesian model averaging (BMA) was employed to address model uncertainty and improve result robustness. Subgroup analyses evaluated treatment-related mortality risk. RESULTS: From an initial cohort of 658 NSCLC patients with BMs, 209 were analyzed with a median age of 59; the majority were male (80.9%) and diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (78.9%). Univariate analysis identified significant variables influencing outcomes, including BMs radiotherapy EQD2, BMs count, local thoracic treatment, BMs radiotherapy field, intracranial response, and systemic treatment post-BMs diagnosis. The C + I + A regimen significantly improved median OS to 23.6 months compared to 11.4 months with C and 16.2 months with C + I, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.43-0.82; P < 0.0001). The two-year OS rate was highest in the C + I + A group at 38.5%, versus 10.5% in C and 20.4% in C + I (P < 0.001). Cox regression and BMA analyses confirmed the stability of BMA in providing HR estimates, yielding area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.785 for BMA and 0.793 for the Cox model, with no significant difference in predictive performance. Subgroup analysis revealed a 71% mortality risk reduction with C + I + A (HR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.18-0.47; P < 0.0001), showing consistent benefits regardless of patient sex, BMs count, extracranial metastases presence, and local thoracic treatments. Treatment sequence analysis indicated a median OS of 33.4 months for patients starting with A, though not statistically significant (HR: 0.59; P = 0.36). The overall incidence of radiation-induced brain injury was low at 3.3%, with rates in the C, C + I, and C + I + A groups being 3.2%, 4.8%, and 1.9%, respectively (P = 0.683). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the significant benefit of the C + I + A combination therapy in improving OS and reducing mortality risk in NSCLC patients with non-sensitive gene-mutated BMs. The sequential administration of A followed by ICIs shows a promising synergistic effect with cranial radiotherapy, highlighting the potential for optimized treatment sequencing. These findings emphasize the efficacy of tailored combination therapies in complex oncological care and suggest that our approach could lead to meaningful improvements in clinical outcomes for this challenging patient population.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , AdultoRESUMEN
Secondary BRAF variations have been identified as a mechanism of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with driver gene-positive NSCLC. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of consensus regarding the characteristics and subsequent treatment strategies for these patients. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with driver gene-positive NSCLC who received TKIs therapy at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between May 2016 and December 2023. The clinical and genetic characteristics of these patients were assessed, along with the impact of various treatment strategies on survival. This study enrolled 27 patients with advanced NSCLC, in whom BRAF variations occurred at a median time of 28 months after the initiation of targeted therapy. The multivariate accelerated failure time (AFT) model revealed that, compared to chemotherapy-based regimens group, the combined targeted therapy group (p < 0.001) and the combined local treatment group for oligo-progression (p < 0.001) significantly extended patient survival. In contrast, continuing the original signaling pathway's targeted monotherapy was associated with shorter survival (p = 0.034). The median global OS for each treatment group was as follows: chemotherapy-based regimens group, 45 months; combined targeted therapy group, 59 months; combined local treatment group for patients with oligo-progression, 46 months; and targeted monotherapy group, 36 months. Study results indicate that the combination targeted therapy group (including TKIs, BRAF inhibitors, and/or MEK inhibitors) and the localized treatment group are more effective than traditional chemotherapy-based regimens in improving survival. Additionally, continuing targeted monotherapy along the original signaling pathway proves less effective than chemotherapy-based regimens.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/antagonistas & inhibidores , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Anciano , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Adulto , MutaciónAsunto(s)
Acrilamidas , Compuestos de Anilina , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Acrilamidas/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Anilina/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Indoles , PirimidinasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the survival effect of thoracic gross tumor volume (GTV) in three-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The data cases were obtained from a single-center retrospective analysis. From May. From 2008 to August 2018, 377 treatment criteria were enrolled. GTV was defined as the volume of the primary lesion and the hilus as well as the mediastinal metastatic lymph node. Chemotherapy was a platinum-based combined regimen of two drugs. The number of median chemotherapy cycles was 4 (2-6), and the cut-off value of the planning target volume (PTV) dose of the primary tumor was 63 Gy (30-76.5 Gy). The cut-off value of GTV volume was 150 cm3 (5.83-3535.20 cm3). RESULTS: The survival rate of patients with GTV <150 cm3 is better than patients with GTV ≥150 cm3. Multivariate Cox regression analyses suggested that peripheral lung cancer, radiation dose ≥63 Gy, GTV <150 cm3, 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy, and CR + PR are good prognostic factors for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. The survival rate of patients with GTV <150 cm3 was longer than patients with ≥150 cm3 when they underwent 2 to 3 cycles of chemotherapy concurrent 3D radiotherapy (p < 0.05). When performing 4 to 6 cycles of chemotherapy concurrent 3D radiotherapy, there was no significant difference between <150 cm3 and ≥150 cm3. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of stage IV NSCLC primary tumor can affect the survival of patients. Appropriate treatment methods can be opted by considering the volume of tumors to extend patients' lifetime to the utmost.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Carga Tumoral , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pronóstico , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to establish and validate the precision of a novel radiomics approach that integrates 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) scan data with clinical information to improve the prognostication of survival rates in patients diagnosed with stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) who are not candidates for surgery. We evaluated pretreatment 18F-FDG PET-CT scans from 156 individuals diagnosed with stage III inoperable NSCLC at Shandong Cancer Hospital. These individuals were divided into two groups: a training set comprising 110 patients and an internal validation set consisting of 46 patients. By employing random forest classifier and cox proportional hazards model , we identified and utilized relevant features to create predictive models and a nomogram. The effectiveness of these models was assessed through the use of the receiver operating characteristics(ROC) curves, Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves, and the application of the nomogram. Our findings showed that the combined model, which integrates both clinical and radiomic data, outperformed those based solely on clinical or radiomic features in predicting 3-year overall survival(OS). Furthermore, calibration plots revealed a high level of agreement between predicted and actual survival times. The research successfully established a predictive radiomics model that integrates 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging with clinical indicators to enhance survival predictions for patients with stage III inoperable NSCLC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Nomogramas , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Anciano , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Adulto , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , RadiómicaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of lung cancer and improved lung cancer survival in trials, but its real-world impact at the population level remains unclear. METHODS: Using data obtained from eight Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries from 2004 through 2019, we addressed the long-term trends in the incidence, incidence-based mortality (IBM), and survival of lung cancer patients in the United States. RESULTS: The incidence and IBM of both non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) all significantly decreased steadily from 2004 to 2019. The 1-year survival (1-YS) of both NSCLC and SCLC improved over time, with the best improvement observed for Stage 4 NSCLC. Two significant turning points of Stage 4 NSCLC 1-YS were observed over the years: 0.63% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33%-0.93%) from 2004 to 2010, 0.81% (95% CI: 0.41%-1.21%) from 2010 to 2014 and a striking 2.09% (95% CI: 1.70%-2.47%) from 2014 to 2019. The same two turning points in 1-YS were pronounced for Stage 4 NSCLC in women, which were coincident with the introduction of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and immunotherapy. However, for Stage 4 NSCLC in men, only one significant turning point in the 1-YS starting in 2014 was found, which might only correspond to immunotherapy. Significant period effects in reduced IBM were also observed for both Stage 4 AD and Stage 4 SQCC during the period. CONCLUSION: This SEER analysis found that immunotherapy improved the survival of Stage 4 NSCLC patients at the population level in the United States. This real-world evidence confirms that immunotherapy has truly revolutionized the management of lung cancer.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Programa de VERF , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/terapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , IncidenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge has emerged as a prominent study area in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ß-glucan was reported to reverse resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors by regulating the tumor microenvironment. In this self-initiated clinical trial (ChiCTR2100054796), NSCLC participants who have previously failed anti-PD-1 therapy received ß-glucan (500 mg, bid, d1-21), Envafolimab (300 mg, d1) and Endostar (210 mg, civ72h) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The clinical efficacy and adverse events were observed, while serum samples were collected for proteomic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty Three patients were enrolled from January 2022 to March 2023 (median age, 65 years; male, n = 18 [78.3%]; squamous NSCLC, n = 9 [39.1%]; mutant type, n = 13 [56.5%]). The overall response rate (ORR) was 21.7% and disease control rate (DCR) was 73.9%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) was 4.3 months [95% CI: 2.0-6.6] and 9.8 months [95% CI: 7.2-12.4], respectively. The mPFS between PD-L1 positive and negative subgroup has significant difference (6.3 months vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.002). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 52.2% of patients. The most common TRAEs were hypothyroidism (26.1%) and fatigue (26.1%). 2 (8.7%) grade 3 adverse events were reported. No adverse reaction related deaths have been observed. Proteomic analysis revealed that the levels of CASP-8, ARG1, MMP12, CD28 and CXCL5 correlated with resistance to the treatment while the levels of CD40-L and EGF related to the favorable response. CONCLUSION: ß-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar has considerable efficacy and safety for immune rechallenge in metastatic NSCLC patients who failed of anti-PD-1 treatment previously, especially for PD-L1 positive patients.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , beta-Glucanos , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/inmunología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inmunología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , beta-Glucanos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Microambiente Tumoral/inmunología , Microambiente Tumoral/efectos de los fármacos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tumour, nodes, and metastases (TNM) staging has been deficient in prognosticating in patients suffering from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To supplement TNM staging, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the regulatory T cells (Treg). METHODS: A keyword search was conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE for full-text original human studies from any region published in English during the last 12 years. Eligible for inclusion were studies evaluating the prognostic value of the number of Treg cells in NSCLC except case studies, case series, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Two reviewers (one reviewer used an automation tool) independently screened the studies and assessed risk-of-bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Meta-analysis was done for studies reporting significant multivariate hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS: Out of 809 retrievals, 24 studies were included in the final review. The low number of Treg cells was found significantly associated with improved overall survival (pooled log OR, 1.646; 95% CI, 1.349, 1.944; p (2-tailed) < .001; SE, 0.1217), improved recurrence-free survival (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.15, 3.46; p = .01), improved progression-free survival (pooled log OR, 2.231; 95% CI, 0.424, 4.038; p (2-tailed) .034; SE, 0.4200), and worse disease-free survival (pooled log OR, 0.992; 95% CI, 0.820, 1.163; p (2-tailed) .009; SE, 0.0135), especially when identified by forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), in any stage or non-metastatic NSCLC. CONCLUSION: A low number of Treg cells indicated better survival, suggesting its potential use as a prognostic biomarker in NSCLC. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol of this review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO on August 28, 2021, and was assigned the registration number CRD42021270598. The protocol can be accessed from PROSPERO website.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Linfocitos T Reguladores , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/inmunología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Humanos , Linfocitos T Reguladores/inmunología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inmunología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
Immune activation status determines non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis, with reported positive/negative associations for T helper type 2 (TH2) responses, including allergen-specific IgE and eosinophils. Our study seeks to explore the potential impact of these comorbid immune responses on the survival rates of patients with NSCLC. Our retrospective study used data from the Data Warehouse of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL) and Lung Biobank at Thoraxklinik Heidelberg. We estimated the association of blood eosinophilia and neutrophilia on survival rates in an inflammatory cohort of 3143 patients with NSCLC. We also tested sensitization to food and inhalants and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in a comorbidity cohort of 212 patients with NSCLC. Finally, we estimated the infiltration of immune-relevant cells including eosinophils, T-cells, and mast cells in a tissue inflammatory sub-cohort of 60 patients with NSCLC. Sensitization to at least one food or inhalant (sIgE) was higher in patients with adenocarcinoma (adeno-LC) than the non-adenocarcinoma (non-adeno-LC). Furthermore, hs-CRP was higher in non-adeno-LC compared with adeno-LC. Peripheral inflammation, particularly eosinophilia and neutrophilia, was associated with poor survival outcomes in NSCLC with a clear difference between histological subgroups. Finally, blood eosinophilia was paralleled by significant eosinophil infiltration into the peritumoral tissue in the lung. This study provides novel perspectives on the crucial role of peripheral inflammation, featuring eosinophilia and neutrophilia, with overall survival, underscoring distinctions between NSCLC subgroups (adeno-LC vs. non-adeno-LC). Peripheral eosinophilia enhances eosinophil infiltration into tumors. This sheds light on the complex interplay between inflammation, eosinophil infiltration, and NSCLC prognosis among various histological subtypes. Further studies are required to underscore the role of eosinophils in NSCLC among different histological subgroups and their role in shaping the tumor microenvironment.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Eosinofilia , Eosinófilos , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/inmunología , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inmunología , Eosinófilos/patología , Eosinófilos/inmunología , Eosinofilia/patología , Eosinofilia/inmunología , Eosinofilia/mortalidad , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inflamación/patología , Inflamación/inmunología , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Neutrófilos/patología , PronósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The 9th edition of the TNM Classification for lung cancer delineates M1c into two subcategories: M1c1 (Multiple extrathoracic lesions within a single organ system) and M1c2 (Multiple extrathoracic lesions involving multiple organ systems). Existing research indicates that patients with lung cancer in stage M1c1 exhibit superior overall survival compared to those in stage M1c2. The primary frontline therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), lacking driver gene mutations, involves the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy. Nevertheless, a dearth of evidence exists regarding potential survival disparities between NSCLC patients with M1c1 and M1c2 undergoing first-line immune-chemotherapy, and reliable biomarkers for predicting treatment outcomes are elusive. Serum metabolic profiles may elucidate distinct prognostic mechanisms, necessitating the identification of divergent metabolites in M1c1 and M1c2 undergoing combination therapy. This study seeks to scrutinize survival discrepancies between various metastatic patterns (M1c1 and M1c2) and pinpoint metabolites associated with treatment outcomes in NSCLC patients undergoing first-line ICIs combined with chemotherapy. METHOD: In this study, 33 NSCLC patients lacking driver gene mutations diagnosed with M1c1, and 22 similarly diagnosed with M1c2 according to the 9th edition of TNM Classification, were enrolled. These patients received first-line PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy. The relationship between metastatic patterns and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients undergoing combination therapy was analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. Serum samples were obtained from all patients before treatment initiation for untargeted metabolomics analysis, aiming to identify differential metabolites. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis of PFS, NSCLC patients in M1c1 receiving first-line PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy exhibited an extended PFS (HR = 0.49, 95% CI, 0.27-0.88, p = 0.017). In multivariate PFS analyses, these M1c1 patients receiving first-line PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy also demonstrated prolonged PFS (HR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.22-0.92, p = 0.028). The serum metabolic profiles of M1c1 and M1c2 undergoing first-line PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy displayed notable distinctions. In comparison to M1c1 patients, M1c2 patients exhibited alterations in various pathways pretreatment, including platelet activation, linoleic acid metabolism, and the VEGF signaling pathway. Diminished levels of lipid-associated metabolites (diacylglycerol, sphingomyelin) were correlated with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: NSCLC patients in M1c1, devoid of driver gene mutations, receiving first-line PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy, experienced superior outcomes compared to M1c2 patients. Moreover, metabolomic profiles strongly correlated with the prognosis of these patients, and M1c2 patients with unfavorable outcomes manifested distinct changes in metabolic pathways before treatment. These changes predominantly involved alterations in lipid metabolism, such as decreased diacylglycerol and sphingomyelin, which may impact tumor migration and invasion.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Pronóstico , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Biomarcadores de TumorRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We established a novel surgical procedure for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which involves resection of the affected lobe and regional lymph nodes without separation, namely en bloc surgery. We introduced the technical details and early and late outcomes by comparing them with those of conventional surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent lobectomy with hilar and mediastinal lymph node dissection for stages I-III NSCLC. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed based on demographic variables. RESULTS: Propensity score-matching yielded 317 pairs. En bloc surgery was not associated with a longer operation time, a higher amount of intraoperative bleeding, or a higher frequency of postoperative complications. The number of resected lymph nodes (P = 0.277) and frequency of N upstaging (P = 0.587) did not differ between the groups. However, en bloc surgery was associated with higher overall survival in comparison to conventional surgery (P = 0.012). According to a stratification analysis, the survival advantage of en bloc surgery over conventional surgery was remarkable in pathological N-positive disease (P = 0.005), whereas it disappeared in pathological N-negative disease (P = 0.147). CONCLUSION: En bloc surgery is feasible and can be performed in patients with possible N-positive NSCLC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neumonectomía , Puntaje de Propensión , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Neumonectomía/mortalidad , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are the most common targetable gene alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In Japan, approximately 40% of patients who undergo surgical resection for non-squamous NSCLC have EGFR mutations. However, no long-term studies have been conducted including a large number of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with postoperative recurrence (PR). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of the data of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with PR who had undergone surgery at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between October 2002 and November 2017. We evaluated post-recurrence overall survival (PRS) and postoperative overall survival (POS) using the Kaplan-Meier method and identify any associations between the clinical variables at recurrence and PRS using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We enrolled 162 patients. The median observation time for PRS was 4.95 years (range, 0.82-13.25) and POS was 5.81 years (range, 2.84-16.71). The median PRS was 5.17 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.90-5.61) and POS was 7.07 years (95% CI, 5.88-8.01). Univariate analysis identified male sex (median PRS: 3.32 vs. 5.39 years; p < 0.05), bone metastasis (median PRS: 2.43 vs. 5.33 years; p < 0.05), and central nervous system (CNS) metastasis (median PRS: 3.05 vs. 5.39 years; p < 0.05) and multivariate analysis identified bone metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01; 95% CI, 1.23-3.28; p < 0.05) and CNS metastasis (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.14-2.98; p < 0.05) as poor prognostic factors. The pattern of recurrence (oligo vs. non-oligo recurrence) was not a prognostic factor. Logistic regression analysis revealed the association between sex and the presence bone/CNS metastasis at recurrence. CONCLUSION: Our data may help visualize future prospects and determine the timing of osimertinib initiation. New treatment strategies need to be developed for patients with bone/CNS metastasis at the first recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Receptores ErbB , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Humanos , Masculino , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Femenino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Receptores ErbB/genética , Pronóstico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Mutación , NeumonectomíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: First-line osimertinib plus chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival of patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to osimertinib, according to the FLAURA2 trial. METHODS: We established a Markov model to compare the cost-effectiveness of osimertinib plus chemotherapy with that of osimertinib alone. Clinical data were obtained from the FLAURA and FLAURA2 trials, and additional data were extracted from online resources and publications. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the findings. We used A willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. The main outcomes were QALYs, overall costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental net monetary benefit, and incremental net health benefit. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to patients' mutation type and central nervous system (CNS) metastatic status. RESULTS: In a 20-year time horizon, the ICER of osimertinib plus chemotherapy versus osimertinib alone was $223,727.1 per QALY gained. The sensitivity analyses identified the cost of osimertinib and the hazard ratio for overall survival as the top 2 influential factors and a 1.9% probability of osimertinib plus chemotherapy to be cost-effective. The subgroup analyses revealed ICERs of $132,614.1, $224,449.8, $201,464.1, and $130,159.7 per QALY gained for L858R mutations, exon 19 deletions, CNS metastases, and no CNS metastases subgroups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of the United States health care system, osimertinib plus chemotherapy is not cost-effective compared to osimertinib alone for treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, but more favorable cost-effectiveness occurs in patients with L858R mutations and patients without baseline CNS metastases.
Asunto(s)
Acrilamidas , Compuestos de Anilina , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Receptores ErbB , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mutación , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/economía , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Compuestos de Anilina/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Anilina/economía , Acrilamidas/uso terapéutico , Acrilamidas/economía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economía , Receptores ErbB/genética , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Cadenas de Markov , Femenino , Masculino , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Indoles , PirimidinasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is a cancer of the elderly, with a median age at diagnosis of 71. More than one-third of people diagnosed with lung cancer are over 75 years old. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are special antibodies that target a pathway in the immune system called the programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) pathway. These antibodies help the immune system fight cancer cells by blocking signals that cancer cells use to avoid being attacked by the immune system. ICIs have changed the treatment of people with lung cancer. In particular, for people with previously-untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), current first-line treatment now comprises ICIs plus platinum-based chemotherapy, rather than platinum-based chemotherapy alone, regardless of their PD-L1 expression status. However, as people age, their immune system changes, becoming less effective in its T cell responses. This raises questions about how well ICIs work in older adults. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy (with or without bevacizumab) in treatment-naïve adults aged 65 years and older with advanced NSCLC. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Lung Cancer Group Trial Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other trial registers, and the websites of drug regulators. The latest search date was 23 August 2023. We also checked references and searched abstracts from the meetings of seven cancer organisations from 2019 to August 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that reported on the efficacy and safety of adding ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone for people 65 years and older who had not previously been treated. All data emanated from international multicentre studies involving adults with histologically-confirmed advanced NSCLC who had not received any previous systemic anticancer therapy for their advanced disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were overall survival and treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher). Our secondary outcomes were progression-free survival, objective response rate, time to response, duration of response, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). MAIN RESULTS: We included 17 primary studies, with a total of 4276 participants, in the review synthesis. We identified nine ongoing studies, and listed one study as 'awaiting classification'. Twelve of the 17 studies included people older than 75 years, accounting for 9% to 13% of their participants. We rated some studies as having 'some concerns' for risk of bias arising from the randomisation process, deviations from the intended interventions, or measurement of the outcome. The overall GRADE rating for the certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate to low because of the risk of bias, imprecision, or inconsistency. People aged 65 years and older The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably increased overall survival compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 0.88; 8 studies, 2093 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Only one study reported data for treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher). The frequency of treatment-related adverse events may not differ between the two treatment groups (risk ratio (RR) 1.09, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.32; 1 study, 127 participants; low-certainty evidence). The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably improves progression-free survival (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.68; 7 studies, 1885 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). People aged 65 to 75 years, inclusive The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably improved overall survival compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.87; 6 studies, 1406 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Only one study reported data for treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher). The frequency of treatment-related adverse events probably increased in people treated with ICIs plus platinum-based chemotherapy compared to those treated with platinum-based chemotherapy alone (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.13; 1 study, 97 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The addition of ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably improved progression-free survival (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.73; 8 studies, 1466 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). People aged 75 years and older There may be no difference in overall survival in people treated with ICIs combined with platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.16; 4 studies, 297 participants; low-certainty evidence). No data on treatment-related adverse events were available in this age group. The effect of combination ICI and platinum-based chemotherapy on progression-free survival is uncertain (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.36; 3 studies, 226 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Only three studies assessed the objective response rate. For time to response, duration of response, and health-related quality of life, we do not have any evidence yet. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Compared to platinum-based chemotherapy alone, adding ICIs to platinum-based chemotherapy probably leads to higher overall survival and progression-free survival, without an increase in treatment-related adverse events (grade 3 or higher), in people 65 years and older with advanced NSCLC. These data are based on results from studies dominated by participants between 65 and 75 years old. However, the analysis also suggests that the improvements reported in overall survival and progression-free survival may not be seen in people older than 75 years.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bevacizumab , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Compuestos de Platino/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: For patients treated with osimertinib as first-line therapy, there have been no studies comparing both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) according to performance status (PS). Furthermore, no studies have examined differences in baseline genetic abnormalities between patients with poor and good PS. Therefore, we aimed to investigate differences in baseline genetic abnormalities and treatment effects between patients with poor and good PS who received osimertinib as the primary treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of the ELUCIDATOR study, which is a multi-center prospective observational study in Japan that assessed mechanisms underlying resistance to osimertinib as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. RESULTS: There were 153 and 25 patients in the good and poor PS groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed no significant between-group differences in PFS (hazards ratio [HR]: 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-1.72, p = 0.946). Multivariate analysis of OS revealed that poor PS was a poor prognostic factor (HR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.43-4.73, p = 0.003). Regarding baseline genetic abnormalities, there was a significant increase in APC-positive cases (20.0% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.009) and a trend toward more CTNNB1-positive cases in the poor PS group than in the good PS group (14.3% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.062). CONCLUSION: There was no between-group difference in PFS, although OS was significantly inferior in the poor PS group. Additionally, there was a significant increase in APC-positive cases and a trend toward more CTNNB1-positive cases in the poor PS group.
Asunto(s)
Acrilamidas , Compuestos de Anilina , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Receptores ErbB , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mutación , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Acrilamidas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Receptores ErbB/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Anilina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Japón , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , beta Catenina/genética , Indoles , PirimidinasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The most appropriate time of primary tumor radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) with EGFR-TKIs remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the time factor of primary tumor radiotherapy on long-term overall survival(OS)and provide a theoretical basis for further clinical research. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 238 patients with EGFR-TKIs and OS ≥ 12 months were statistically analysed. Patients were grouped: the D group without primary tumor radiotherapy and the R group with it.The R group were divided into three groups according to the interval between the start of EGFR-TKIs and the start of primary tumor radiotherapy: R0 - 30(<30 days), R30 - PD(≥ 30 days and disease stable), and RPD(radiotherapy after disease progression). The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival analyses. Exploratory landmark analyses were investigated. RESULTS: The OS rates at 1, 2, 3, 5 years for the R group and D group were 96.8%, 62.9%, 38.3%, 17.1%, and 95.6%, 37.7%, 21.8%, 2.9%, respectively; the corresponding MST was 29 months(95% CI: 24.3-33.7) for the R group and 22 months(95% CI: 20.4-23.6) for the D group (χ2 = 13.480, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that primary tumor radiotherapy was independent predictors of prolonged OS.Among the four groups, The R30 - PD appeared to have the best OS (D, χ2 = 19.307, p<0.001;R0 - 30, χ2 = 11.687, p = 0.01; RPD, χ2 = 4.086, p = 0.043). Landmark analyses(22 months) showed the R30 - PD group had a significant long-term OS.The incidence of radiation pneumonitis ≥ grade 2 was17.3%(n = 19)and radiation esophagitis ≥ grade 2 was observed in 32 patients(29.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that primary tumour radiotherapy may prolong long-term OS with acceptable toxicities. Appropriate delay(R30 - PD)of primary tumour radiotherapy may be the best choice.Premature radiotherapy(R0 - 30) and radiotherapy after disease progression (RPD)may not be reasonable for long-term OS.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Receptores ErbB , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Tiempo de TratamientoRESUMEN
B cells are adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment and play an important role in tumor development and metastasis. However, the roles of genetic variants of the immunity B cell-related genes in the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain unknown. In the present study, we first evaluated associations between 10,776 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 220 immunity B cell-related genes and survival of NSCLC in a discovery dataset of 1,185 patients from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. We found that 369 SNPs were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) of NSCLC in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (P ≤ 0.05, Bayesian false discovery probability ≤ 0.80), of which 18 SNPs were validated in another independent genotyping dataset of 984 patients from the Harvard Lung Cancer Susceptibility (HLCS) Study. We then performed linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis, followed by stepwise analysis with a multivariable Cox regression model. Finally, two independent SNPs, inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase D (INPP5D) rs13385922 C>T and exosome component 3 (EXOSC3) rs3208406 A>G, remained significantly associated withNSCLC OS with a combined hazards ratio (HR) of 1.14 (95% confidence interval = 1.06-1.23, P = 2.41×10-4) and 1.20 (95% confidence interval = 1.14-1.28, P = 3.41×10-9), respectively. Furthermore, NSCLC patients with the combination of unfavorable genotypes for these two SNPs were associated with a poor OS (P trend = 0.0002) and disease-specific survival (DSS, P trend < 0.0001) in the PLCO dataset. Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) analysis suggested that the INPP5D rs6782875 T allele was significantly correlated with elevated INPP5D mRNA expression levels in normal lung tissues and whole blood samples, while the EXOSC3 rs3208406 G allele was significantly correlated with increased EXOSC3 mRNA expression levels in normal lung tissues. Our data indicated that genetic variants in these immunity B cell-related genes may predict NSCLC survival possibly by influencing the gene expression.