Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.865
Filtrar
1.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 43(1): 247, 2024 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39215325

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Camptothecin (CPT) is one of the frequently used small chemotherapy drugs for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but its clinical application is limited due to severe toxicities and acquired resistance. Combined chemo-gene therapy has been reported to be an effective strategy for counteracting drug resistance while sensitizing cancer cells to cytotoxic agents. Thus, we hypothesized that combining CPT with miR-145 could synergistically suppress tumor proliferation and enhance anti-tumor activity. METHODS: Lactobionic acid (LA) modified lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) were developed to co-deliver CPT and miR-145 into asialoglycoprotein receptors-expressing HCC in vitro and in vivo. We evaluated the synergetic antitumor effect of miR-145 and CPT using CCK8, Western blotting, apoptosis and wound scratch assay in vitro, and the mechanisms underlying the synergetic antitumor effects were further investigated. Tumor inhibitory efficacy, safety evaluation and MRI-visible ability were assessed using diethylnitrosamine (DEN) + CCl4-induced HCC mouse model. RESULTS: The LA modification improved the targeting delivery of cargos to HCC cells and tissues. The LA-CMGL-mediated co-delivery of miR-145 and CPT is more effective on tumor inhibitory than LA-CPT-L or LA-miR-145-L treatment alone, both in vitro and in vivo, with almost no side effects during the treatment period. Mechanistically, miR-145 likely induces apoptosis by targeting SUMO-specific peptidase 1 (SENP1)-mediated hexokinase (HK2) SUMOylation and glycolysis pathways and, in turn, sensitizing the cancer cells to CPT. In vitro and in vivo tests confirmed that the loaded Gd-DOTA served as an effective T1-weighted contrast agent for noninvasive tumor detection as well as real-time monitoring of drug delivery and biodistribution. CONCLUSIONS: The LA-CMGL-mediated co-delivery of miR-145 and CPT displays a synergistic therapy against HCC. The novel MRI-visible, actively targeted chemo-gene co-delivery system for HCC therapy provides a scientific basis and a useful idea for the development of HCC treatment strategies in the future.


Asunto(s)
Camptotecina , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , MicroARNs , Nanopartículas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/genética , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/metabolismo , Animales , Ratones , MicroARNs/genética , MicroARNs/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Humanos , Nanopartículas/química , Camptotecina/farmacología , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , Línea Celular Tumoral , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Lípidos/química , Liposomas
2.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1447280, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39211043

RESUMEN

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents a major therapeutic challenge due to its heterogeneous and aggressive phenotype, and limited target-specific treatment options. The trophoblast cell surface antigen (Trop-2), a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in various cancers, has emerged as a promising target for TNBC. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that targets Trop-2, has recently entered treatment algorithms for advanced and metastatic TNBC, independently from Trop-2 expression status, with manageable toxicity. Despite the impressive results, questions remain unsolved regarding its efficacy, safety profile, and Trop-2 biological role in cancer. Currently, Trop-2 cannot be designated as a predictive biomarker in SG treatment, albeit its expression correlates with disease outcome, yet its levels are not uniform across all TNBCs. Additionally, data regarding Trop-2 expression variations in primary and metastatic sites, and its interplay with other biomarkers are still ambiguous but mandatory in light of future applications of SG in other indications and settings. This poses the questions of a careful evaluation of the efficacy and toxicity profile of SG in such early stages of disease, and in personalized and combinatorial strategies. Research and clinical data are mandatory to address SG drawbacks and minimize its benefits, to realize its full potential as therapeutic agent in different epithelial tumors.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antígenos de Neoplasias , Camptotecina , Moléculas de Adhesión Celular , Inmunoconjugados , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama Triple Negativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Antígenos de Neoplasias/inmunología , Moléculas de Adhesión Celular/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Animales , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional
3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 8: CD012757, 2024 08 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39119869

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The liver is affected by two groups of malignant tumours: primary liver cancers and liver metastases. Liver metastases are significantly more common than primary liver cancer, and five-year survival after radical surgical treatment of liver metastases ranges from 28% to 50%, depending on primary cancer site. However, R0 resection (resection for cure) is not feasible in most people; therefore, other treatments have to be considered in the case of non-resectability. One possible option is based on the concept that the blood supply to hepatic tumours originates predominantly from the hepatic artery. Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) of the peripheral branches of the hepatic artery can be achieved by administering a chemotherapeutic drug followed by vascular occlusive agents and can lead to selective necrosis of the cancer tissue while leaving normal liver parenchyma virtually unaffected. The entire procedure can be performed without infusion of chemotherapy and is then called bland transarterial embolisation (TAE). These procedures are usually applied over a few sessions. Another possible treatment option is systemic chemotherapy which, in the case of colorectal cancer metastases, is most commonly performed using FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan) regimens applied in multiple sessions over a long period of time. These therapies disrupt the cell cycle, leading to death of rapidly dividing malignant cells. Current guidelines determine the role of TAE and TACE as non-curative treatment options applicable in people with liver-only or liver-dominant metastatic disease that is unresectable or non-ablatable, and in people who have failed systemic chemotherapy. Regarding the treatment modalities in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases, we found no systematic reviews comparing the efficacy of TAE or TACE versus systemic chemotherapy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of transarterial embolisation (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) compared with systemic chemotherapy in people with liver-dominant unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and three additional databases up to 4 April 2024. We also searched two trials registers and the European Medicines Agency database and checked reference lists of retrieved publications. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised clinical trials assessing beneficial and harmful effects of TAE or TACE versus systemic chemotherapy in adults (aged 18 years or older) with colorectal cancer liver metastases. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality; overall survival (time to mortality); and any adverse events or complications. Our secondary outcomes were cancer mortality; health-related quality of life; progression-free survival; proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease; time to progression of liver metastases; recurrence of liver metastases; and tumour response measures (complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease). For the purpose of the review and to perform necessary analyses, whenever possible, we converted survival rates to mortality rates, as this was our primary outcome. For the analysis of dichotomous outcomes, we used the risk ratio (RR); for continuous outcomes, we used the mean difference; and for time to event outcomes, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used the standardised mean difference with 95% CIs when the trials used different instruments. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. We based our conclusions on outcomes analysed at the longest follow-up. MAIN RESULTS: We included three trials with 118 participants randomised to TACE versus 120 participants to systemic chemotherapy. Four participants were excluded; one due to disease progression prior to treatment and three due to decline in health. The trials reported data on one or more outcomes. Two trials were performed in China and one in Italy. The trials differed in terms of embolisation techniques and chemotherapeutic agents. Follow-up ranged from 12 months to 50 months. TACE may reduce mortality at longest follow-up (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94; 3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. TACE may have little to no effect on overall survival (time to mortality) (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.01; 1 trial, 70 participants; very low-certainty evidence), any adverse events or complications (3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), health-related quality of life (2 trials, 154 participants; very low-certainty evidence), progression-free survival (1 trial, 70 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and tumour response measures (presented as the overall response rate) (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.96; 3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. No trials reported cancer mortality, proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease, and recurrence of liver metastases. We found no trials comparing the effects of TAE versus systemic chemotherapy in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence regarding effectiveness of TACE versus systemic chemotherapy in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases is of very low certainty and is based on three trials. Our confidence in the results is limited due to the risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. It is very uncertain whether TACE confers benefits with regard to reduction in mortality, overall survival (time to mortality), reduction in adverse events or complications, improvement in health-related quality of life, improvement in progression-free survival, and tumour response measures (presented as the overall response rate). Data on cancer mortality, proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease, and recurrence of liver metastases are lacking. We found no trials assessing TAE versus systemic chemotherapy. More randomised clinical trials are needed to strengthen the body of evidence and provide insight into the benefits and harms of TACE or TAE in comparison with systemic chemotherapy in people with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Fluorouracilo , Leucovorina , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Arteria Hepática , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación
5.
Lancet Oncol ; 25(9): 1147-1162, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39116902

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab deruxtecan has shown encouraging activity in patients with treatment-refractory HER2-positive, RAS wild-type and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Dose optimisation and further antitumour assessments in patients with RAS mutations and those with previous anti-HER2 therapy are warranted. We aimed to evaluate two doses of trastuzumab deruxtecan (5·4 mg/kg and 6·4 mg/kg) to establish the recommended dose in patients with pretreated HER2-positive, RAS wild-type or mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: DESTINY-CRC02 was a multicentre, randomised, two-stage, two-arm, phase 2 study done in 53 research hospitals and medical centres in Australia, Belgium, France, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, the UK, and the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18 years and older or 20 years and older (depending on region) with pretreated pathologically documented, unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic HER2-positive, and RAS wild-type or mutant colorectal cancer. Patients were required to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 and have received previous chemotherapy, and anti-EGFR, anti-VEGF, or anti-PD-L1 therapy, if clinically indicated. In stage 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via a secure interactive response technology system, to receive 5·4 mg/kg or 6·4 mg/kg trastuzumab deruxtecan administered intravenously every 21 days. Stratification factors were ECOG performance status, HER2 status, and RAS status. In stage 2, patients were assigned into the 5·4 mg/kg treatment group only. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review, assessed in all patients for whom treatment was assigned (full analysis set). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04744831, and is ongoing (not recruiting). FINDINGS: Between March 5, 2021, and March 29, 2022, 135 patients were centrally screened, 122 of whom were enrolled. In stage 1, 40 patients each were randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg and 6·4 mg/kg. In stage 2, an additional 42 patients were enrolled in the 5·4 mg/kg group. 64 (52%) participants were male and 58 (48%) were female. The median duration of follow-up was 8·9 months (IQR 6·7-10·5) in the 5·4 mg/kg group and 10·3 months (5·9-12·7) in the 6·4 mg/kg group. The confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review was 37·8% (31/82 [95% CI 27·3-49·2]) in the 5·4 mg/kg group and 27·5% (11/40 [14·6-43·9]) in the 6·4 mg/kg group. 34 (41%) of 83 patients in the 5·4 mg/kg group and 19 (49%) of 39 in the 6·4 mg/kg group had grade 3 or worse drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events. The most common grade 3 or worse drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were neutrophil count decreased (13 [16%] of 83 patients), anaemia (six [7%]), nausea (six [7%]), and white blood cell count decreased (five [6%]) in the 5·4 mg/kg group; and were neutrophil count decreased (10 [26%] of 39 patients), anaemia (eight [21%]), platelet count decreased (four [10%]), and white blood cell count decreased (four [10%]) in the 6·4 mg/kg group. Drug-related serious adverse events occurred in 11 (13%) of 83 patients in the 5·4 mg/kg group and six (15%) of 39 patients in the 6·4 mg/kg group; the most common in the 5·4 mg/kg group was nausea (three [4%] patients) and the most common in the 6·4 mg/kg group were fatigue (two [5%] patients), neutropenia (two [5%]), and thrombocytopenia (two [5%]). A drug-related treatment-emergent adverse event related to death occurred in one (1%) patient in the 5·4 mg/kg group (due to hepatic failure). Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis events were observed in seven (8%) patients in the 5·4 mg/kg group (all grade 1 or 2) and in five (13%) patients in the 6·4 mg/kg group (four grade 1 or 2; one grade 5). INTERPRETATION: The promising antitumour activity and favourable safety profile support trastuzumab deruxtecan 5·4 mg/kg as the optimal single-agent dose for patients with pretreated HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer, including those with RAS mutations, previous anti-HER2 therapy, or both. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Receptor ErbB-2 , Trastuzumab , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Mutación , Inmunoconjugados
7.
J Med Econ ; 27(1): 1076-1085, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39102473

RESUMEN

AIMS: Fruquintinib is a selective small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1, -2, and -3 recently approved in the United States (US) for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who have previously been treated with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy, an anti-VEGF biological therapy, and if RAS wild-type and medically appropriate, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. This study aimed to estimate the 5-year budget impact of fruquintinib from a US payer perspective (commercial and Medicare). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A budget impact model was developed to compare two scenarios: a reference scenario in which patients received regorafenib, trifluridine/tipiracil, or trifluridine/tipiracil with bevacizumab and an alternative scenario in which patients received reference scenario treatments or fruquintinib. Market shares were evenly divided across available options. A 5-year time horizon and a hypothetical health plan of 1 million members was assumed. The model included epidemiological inputs to estimate the eligible population; clinical inputs for treatment duration, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse event (AE) frequency; and cost inputs for treatment, AEs, disease management, subsequent therapy, and terminal care costs. Budget impact was reported as total, per member per year (PMPY), and per member per month (PMPM). RESULTS: The model estimated an eligible population of 194 patients (39 per year) over 5 years. In the base case, the estimated 5-year budget impact of fruquintinib was $4,077,073 ($0.82 PMPY and 0.07 PMPM) for a commercial health plan. During the first year, the estimated budget impact was $627,570 ($0.63 PMPY and 0.05 PMPM). Results were robust across sensitivity analyses. PMPM costs from the Medicare perspective were greater than the base-case (commercial) ($0.17 vs. $0.07) due to higher incidence of CRC in that population. CONCLUSIONS: Fruquintinib is associated with a low budget impact for payers based on proposed thresholds in the US.


Fruquintinib is a treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer that has progressed after or not responded to multiple guideline-recommended therapies. This budget impact analysis was conducted to estimate the added costs a health plan would incur over a 5-year period if it chose to cover this therapy. The analysis found that the per plan member per month cost of covering fruquintinib was $0.07 for a United States commercial health plan and $0.17 for Medicare.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Benzofuranos , Bevacizumab , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Piridinas , Timina , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Benzofuranos/uso terapéutico , Benzofuranos/economía , Estados Unidos , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/economía , Trifluridina/uso terapéutico , Trifluridina/economía , Presupuestos , Quinazolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinas/economía , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/economía , Uracilo/análogos & derivados , Uracilo/uso terapéutico , Uracilo/economía , Compuestos Organoplatinos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Organoplatinos/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/economía , Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Irinotecán/economía , Medicare , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Fluorouracilo/economía , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino/economía , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Modelos Económicos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Pirrolidinas
8.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 6707, 2024 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39112464

RESUMEN

Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) is an antibody-drug conjugate that has demonstrated efficacy in patients with TROP-2 expressing epithelial cancers. In a xenograft model of intracranial breast cancer, SG inhibited tumor growth and increased mouse survival. We conducted a prospective window-of-opportunity trial (NCT03995706) at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio to examine the intra-tumoral concentrations and intracranial activity of SG in patients undergoing craniotomy for breast cancer with brain metastases (BCBM) or recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). We enrolled 25 patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with BCBM and rGBM to receive a single intravenous dose of SG at 10 mg/kg given one day before resection and continued on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles following recovery. The PFS was 8 months and 2 months for BCBM and rGBM cohorts, respectively. The OS was 35.2 months and 9.5 months, respectively. Grade≥3 AE included neutropenia (28%), hypokalemia (8%), seizure (8%), thromboembolic event (8%), urinary tract infection (8%) and muscle weakness of the lower limb (8%). In post-surgical tissue, the median total SN-38 was 249.8 ng/g for BCBM and 104.5 ng/g for rGBM, thus fulfilling the primary endpoint. Biomarker analysis suggests delivery of payload by direct release at target site and that hypoxic changes do not drive indirect release. Secondary endpoint of OS was 35.2 months for the BCBM cohort and 9.5 months for rGBM. Non-planned exploratory endpoint of ORR was 38% for BCBM and 29%, respectively. Exploratory endpoint of Trop-2 expression was observed in 100% of BCBM and 78% of rGBM tumors. In conclusion, SG was found to be well tolerated with adequate penetration into intracranial tumors and promising preliminary activity within the CNS. Trial Registration: Trial (NCT03995706) enrolled at Clinical Trials.gov as Neuro/Sacituzumab Govitecan/Breast Brain Metastasis/Glioblastoma/Ph 0: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03995706?cond=NCT03995706 .


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias de la Mama , Glioblastoma , Inmunoconjugados , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Humanos , Femenino , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/patología , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/uso terapéutico , Antígenos de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Moléculas de Adhesión Celular/metabolismo
9.
Anticancer Drugs ; 35(9): 844-851, 2024 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39109395

RESUMEN

Patients with right-sided metastatic colon carcinoma have a significantly worse prognosis than those with left-sided colorectal cancer (CRC), regardless of treatment. The aim of the prospective IVOPAK II study was to implement an interdisciplinary guideline-conform personalized CRC palliative therapy of metastatic colorectal carcinoma and to improve the overall survival (OS) by multidisciplinary approach via secondary metastatic resection. We present the efficacy data of first-line treatment and the benefit of interdisciplinary collaboration of right-sided metastatic colon carcinoma patients: n  = 25. RAS mutation: n  = 20 (80%): received systemic first-line treatment: FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. All-RAS-wildtype: n  = 5 (20%): received systemic first-line treatment: FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. Last date evaluation: 31 January 2024. Median age: 59.6 years (range 42-71), men/women: 14/11. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) index: 0/1/2 : 11/10/4. Evaluable for response: n  = 25. Complete response: n  = 0, partial response: n  = 14 (56%), stable disease: n  = 8 (32%), progressive disease: n  = 3 (12%), early tumor shrinkage: n  = 13 (52%), estimates progression-free survival: 13 months (95% CI 8-17 months), estimated OS: 48 months (95% CI 25-71 months), median follow-up: 26 months (1-61 months), no evidence of disease: n  = 4 (16%). A chemotherapy doublette regimen with FOLFIRI plus a biological as first-line treatment shows promising efficacy and secondary metastatic resection after interdisciplinary discussion was associated with a survival benefit in right-sided metastatic colon carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Camptotecina , Neoplasias del Colon , Fluorouracilo , Leucovorina , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Cetuximab/administración & dosificación , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Mutación , Tasa de Supervivencia
10.
Anticancer Drugs ; 35(8): 769-773, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39115060

RESUMEN

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate formed by the combination of trastuzumab and deruxtecan. It is used in human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor (HER2) mutant breast, stomach and colorectal cancers as well as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The 58-year-old denovo metastatic NSCLC patient we will discuss here progressed with newly developing brain metastasis under first-line carboplatin/paclitaxel treatment. After next generation sequencing revealed a mutation in the ERBB2 gene located in exon 20, we administered T-DXd to our patient. While a significant improvement was observed in the clinical condition of the patient after one course of treatment, brain metastases were found to be in complete response in control screening after four courses of treatment. Systemic screening with PET/computed tomography showed nearly complete regression of the primary lesion, metastatic lymphadenopathies, and surrenal metastases. T-DXd may be successfully used in HER2 mutant metastatic NSCLC patients. In addition, it can also be successfully used in patients with central nervous system metastases with or without cranial radiotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Camptotecina , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Exones , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Receptor ErbB-2 , Trastuzumab , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Mutación , Femenino , Masculino , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico
11.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 43(1): 236, 2024 Aug 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39164784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anti-HER2 therapies, including the HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), have led to improved survival outcomes in patients with HER2-overexpressing (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer. However, intrinsic or acquired resistance to anti-HER2-based therapies remains a clinical challenge in these patients, as there is no standard of care following disease progression. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the mechanisms of resistance to T-DM1 and T-DXd in HER2+ BC patients and preclinical models and identify targets whose inhibition enhances the antitumor activity of T-DXd in HER2-directed ADC-resistant HER2+ breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: Targeted DNA and whole transcriptome sequencing were performed in breast cancer patient tissue samples to investigate genetic aberrations that arose after anti-HER2 therapy. We generated T-DM1 and T-DXd-resistant HER2+ breast cancer cell lines. To elucidate their resistance mechanisms and to identify potential synergistic kinase targets for enhancing the efficacy of T-DXd, we used fluorescence in situ hybridization, droplet digital PCR, Western blotting, whole-genome sequencing, cDNA microarray, and synthetic lethal kinome RNA interference screening. In addition, cell viability, colony formation, and xenograft assays were used to determine the synergistic antitumor effect of T-DXd combinations. RESULTS: We found reduced HER2 expression in patients and amplified DNA repair-related genes in patients after anti-HER2 therapy. Reduced ERBB2 gene amplification in HER2-directed ADC-resistant HER2+ breast cancer cell lines was through DNA damage and epigenetic mechanisms. In HER2-directed ADC-resistant HER2+ breast cancer cell lines, our non-biased RNA interference screening identified the DNA repair pathway as a potential target within the canonical pathways to enhance the efficacy of T-DXd. We validated that the combination of T-DXd with ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related inhibitor, elimusertib, led to significant breast cancer cell death in vitro (P < 0.01) and in vivo (P < 0.01) compared to single agents. CONCLUSIONS: The DNA repair pathways contribute to HER2-directed ADC resistance. Our data justify exploring the combination treatment of T-DXd with DNA repair-targeting drugs to treat HER2-directed ADC-resistant HER2+ breast cancer in clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Reparación del ADN , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Inmunoconjugados , Receptor ErbB-2 , Trastuzumab , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Trastuzumab/farmacología , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico , Animales , Inmunoconjugados/farmacología , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Ratones , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Línea Celular Tumoral , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/farmacología , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Sinergismo Farmacológico
12.
Cancer Med ; 13(16): e70096, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39157928

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sacituzumab govitecan (sacituzumab) emerged as an important agent in metastatic and locally recurrent HER2-negative breast cancer treatment. UGT1A1 polymorphisms have also been shown to predict sacituzumab toxicity. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we sought to evaluate the associations between UGT1A1 status, toxicity, and therapeutic outcomes in sacituzumab recipients with advanced breast cancer who underwent genotype testing for UGT1A1 alleles (N = 68). RESULTS: We found 17 (25%) of our patients to be homozygous for UGT1A1*28 and 24 (35.3%) were heterozygous. Of seven African American patients with triple-negative breast cancer, five were homozygous for UGT1A1*28 and two were heterozygous. Patients with a homozygous UGT1A1*28 genotype were significantly more likely to have treatment terminated because of adverse effects. However, the polymorphism was not associated with treatment discontinuation because of disease progression. CONCLUSION: This retrospective, real-world analysis suggests potential clinical utility in UGT1A1 testing for patients receiving sacituzumab, but future trials are needed to confirm the association between genotypes and treatment outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Neoplasias de la Mama , Camptotecina , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Glucuronosiltransferasa , Humanos , Femenino , Glucuronosiltransferasa/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Adulto , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Anciano , Polimorfismo Genético , Genotipo , Inmunoconjugados
13.
Clin Cancer Res ; 30(15): 3179-3188, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39086310

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Human trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) is a protein highly expressed in urothelial cancer (UC). Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a Trop-2-directed antibody drug conjugate with a hydrolysable linker and a potent SN-38 payload. This study explored Trop-2 expression in tumors treated with SG in cohorts 1 to 3 (C1-3) from the TROPHY-U-01 study and evaluated whether efficacy was associated with Trop-2 expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TROPHY-U-01 (NCT03547973) is an open-label phase II study that assessed the efficacy and safety of SG (alone or in combinations) in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC (mUC). Archival tumor samples collected at enrollment for C1-3 were analyzed for Trop-2 membrane expression by considering histological scores (H-scores; scale 0-300) and the percentage of membrane positive tumor cells at low magnification (4×). The association of Trop-2 with clinical endpoints [objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)] was evaluated. RESULTS: In C1-3, tissue was collected from 158 (82%) of 192 treated patients, and 146 (76%) had evaluable Trop-2 data. Trop-2 was highly expressed in tumor samples. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] Trop-2 H-score was 215 (180-246), and the median (IQR) percentage of membrane positive tumor cells was 91% (80-98). Trop-2 expression at any level was observed in 98% of patients. Furthermore, ORR, PFS, and OS benefits were observed across all Trop-2 expression levels. CONCLUSIONS: Trop-2 protein is highly expressed in UC, as confirmed by examining tumors from patients enrolled in the TROPHY-U-01 trial. The results indicate that SG demonstrates efficacy in mUC across Trop-2 expression levels.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antígenos de Neoplasias , Camptotecina , Moléculas de Adhesión Celular , Inmunoconjugados , Humanos , Moléculas de Adhesión Celular/metabolismo , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Neoplasias Urológicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Urológicas/metabolismo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estadificación de Neoplasias
14.
Nanoscale ; 16(32): 15256-15264, 2024 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39073351

RESUMEN

An anticancer nanodrug with few side effects that does not require the use of a nanocarrier, polyethylene glycol, or other additives has been developed. We have fabricated nano-prodrugs (NPDs) composed only of homodimeric prodrugs of the anticancer agent SN-38, which contains a disulfide bond. The prodrugs are stable against hydrolysis but selectively release SN-38 when the disulfide bond is cleaved by glutathione, which is present in high concentrations in cancer cells. The best-performing NPDs showed good dispersion stability in nanoparticle form, and animal experiments revealed that they possess much higher antitumor activity than irinotecan, a clinically applied prodrug of SN-38. This performance was achieved by improving tumor accumulation due to the size effect and targeted drug release mechanism. The present study provides an insight into the development of non-invasive NPDs with high pharmacological activity, and also offers new possibilities for designing prodrug molecules that can release drugs in response to various kinds of triggers.


Asunto(s)
Camptotecina , Irinotecán , Profármacos , Profármacos/química , Profármacos/farmacología , Animales , Irinotecán/química , Irinotecán/farmacología , Humanos , Ratones , Camptotecina/química , Camptotecina/farmacología , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Línea Celular Tumoral , Antineoplásicos/química , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Nanopartículas/química , Liberación de Fármacos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/patología , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Desnudos
15.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 150(7): 332, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38951245

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, after failure of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, this trial compares the efficacy of second-line therapy with FOLFIRI vs. OFF (1:1 randomisation) with cross-over to the vice-versa regimen as third-line therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The primary endpoint was PFS (progression-free survival: time from randomization until progression or death) of second-line therapy. The trial aimed to demonstrate non-inferiority of FOLFIRI vs OFF (non-inferiority margin of a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.5, power of 80% and a significance level of 5%, 196 events needed). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival of third-line therapy and safety. The trial is registered with EudraCT Nr. 2016-004640-11. RESULTS: The trial was terminated with 60 evaluable (37 with FOLFIRI, 23 with OFF) patients due to insufficient recruitment. PFS of second-line therapy was 2.4 (95% CI 2.3-2.6) months with FOLFIRI vs 2.4 (95% CI 2.2-2.7) months with OFF (HR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.45-1.42, P = 0.43). OS was comparable between the arms (HR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.54-1.66), P = 0.84). Only 4 out of 28 (14%) patients receiving third-line therapy achieved a disease control (partial remission or stable disease). Both second-line regimens were well tolerated without new or unexpected safety signals being observed. CONCLUSION: The exploratory analysis of this early terminated trial suggests that FOLFIRI and OFF have similar efficacy ant toxicity as second-line therapy of PDAC after failure of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Third-line therapy regardless of regimen does not provide satisfactory efficacy in this sequential treatment algorithm.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Fluorouracilo , Irinotecán , Leucovorina , Oxaliplatino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Irinotecán/administración & dosificación , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Cruzados
19.
Target Oncol ; 19(5): 705-710, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963654

RESUMEN

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting HER2-positive malignancies across various tumor types. Through its unique composition, T-DXd achieves selective payload delivery, inducing cell death and halting tumor progression. Clinical trials initially investigated T-DXd's efficacy in HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast, gastric, lung, and colorectal cancers; however, recent results from the DESTINY-PanTumor02 trial further underscore T-DXd's versatility, prompting T-DXd's US FDA approval for HER2-positive (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 3+) solid tumors. Moreover, in addition to T-DXd's efficacy against brain metastasis, T-DXd is showing promising results in HER2-low and HER2-ultra-low metastatic breast cancer, indicating a broader population of patients who may benefit.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor , Inmunoconjugados , Receptor ErbB-2 , Trastuzumab , Humanos , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico , Trastuzumab/farmacología , Inmunoconjugados/farmacología , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/farmacología , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico
20.
Ann Oncol ; 35(10): 873-881, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986769

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) results in an excellent local disease control but the metastasis rates remain high. PRODIGE 23 demonstrated improved disease-free survival (DFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) with total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard of care in this population. Long-term analysis of overall survival (OS) is reported here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study design, participants, and primary endpoint DFS have been reported for this multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial investigating the neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX (6 cycles) followed by chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (6 cycles), versus chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (12 cycles) in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma under peritoneal reflection on magnetic resonance imaging, and staged cT3/T4. Key secondary endpoints included OS, MFS, and local and metastatic recurrence rate. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 82.2 months, the 7-year DFS was 67.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 60.7% to 73.9%] and 62.5% (95% CI 55.6% to 68.6%) [restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference 5.73 months, 95% CI 0.05-11.41 months, P = 0.048] in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the standard-of-care groups, respectively. The 7-year MFS was 79.2% (95% CI 73.0% to 84.4%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 72.3% (95% CI 65.8% to 77.8%) in the standard-of-care group (RMST difference 6.1 months, 95% CI 0.93-11.37 months, P = 0.021). The 7-year OS was 81.9% (95% CI 75.8% to 86.6%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 76.1% (95% CI 69.7% to 81.2%) in the standard-of-care group (RMST difference 4.37 months, 95% CI 0.35-8.38 months, P = 0.033). The safety profile remained unchanged since the previous analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiotherapy improved OS, confirmed long-term DFS and MFS benefits in LARC patients, and should be considered as one of the best options of care for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Irinotecán/administración & dosificación , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA