RESUMEN

PURPOSE: While cochlea is adult size at birth, etiologies and bone density may differ between children and adults. Differences in neural response thresholds (tNRT) and the spread of excitation (SOE) width may impact the use of artificial intelligence algorithms in speech processor fitting. AIM: To identify whether neural response telemetry threshold and spread of excitation width are similar in adults and children. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study approved by the Ethical Board. Intraoperative tNRT and SOE recordings of consecutive cochlear implant surgeries in adults and children implanted with Cochlear devices (Cochlear™, Australia) were selected. SOE was recorded on electrode 11 (or adjacent, corresponding to the medial region of the cochlea) through the standard forward-masking technique in Custom Sound EP software, which provides SOE width in millimeters. Statistical comparison between adults and children was performed using the Mann-Whitney test (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Of 1282 recordings of intraoperative evaluations, 414 measurements were selected from children and adults. Despite the tNRT being similar between adults and children, SOE width was significantly different, with lower values in children with perimodiolar arrays. Besides, it was observed that there is a difference in the electrode where the SOE function peak occurred, more frequently shifted to electrode 12 in adults implanted. In straight arrays, there was no difference in any of the parameters analyzed on electrode 11. CONCLUSION: Although eCAP thresholds are similar, SOE measurements differ between adults and children in perimodiolar electrodes.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Background: Short array cochlear implant is indicated as rehabilitation in patients with severe to profound deafness, especially when there is cochlear ossification. In these cases, with reduced intracochlear patency, total insertion becomes more difficult, requiring the use of this type of electrode (15 mm). Few studies have been published to evaluate auditory performance, presenting controversial audiological results.Aims/Objectives: To report the speech perception of users of cochlear implants (CI) with short array. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of medical records of patients who underwent surgery for cochlear implantation with a short array, between 2009 and 2020, at the Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo (HRAC-USP) was carried out. Results: There was performance evolution in the speech perception tests in the data analysis. Meningitis and congenital hearing loss were the main indications for CI in the sample. Conclusion. CI with a short array is an alternative in the management of patients with a history of cochlear ossification and severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss. Significance: To demonstrate the evolution of speech perception tests with short array cochlear implant in patients with or without ossified cochlea and its characteristics for application in clinical practice.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Objectives: To investigate the outcomes of cochlear re-implantation using multi-mode grounding stimulation associated with anodic monophasic pulses to manage abnormal facial nerve stimulation (AFNS) in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Methods: Retrospective case report. An adult CI recipient with severe AFNS and decrease in auditory performance was re-implanted with a new CI device to change the pulse shape and stimulation mode. Patient's speech perception scores and AFNS were compared before and after cochlear re-implantation, using monopolar stimulation associated with cathodic biphasic pulses and multi-mode stimulation mode associated to anodic monophasic pulses, respectively. The insertion depth angle and the electrode-nerve distances were also investigated, before and after cochlear re-implantation. Results: AFNS was resolved, and the speech recognition scores rapidly increased in the first year after cochlear re-implantation while remaining stable. After cochlear re-implantation, the e15 and e20 electrodes showed shorter electrode-nerve distances compared to their correspondent e4 and e7 electrodes, which induced AFNS in the first implantation. Conclusions: Cochlear re-implantation with multi-mode grounding stimulation associated with anodic monophasic pulses was an effective strategy for managing AFNS. The patient's speech perception scores rapidly improved and AFNS was not detected four years after cochlear re-implantation.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

La electrococleografía es una técnica electrofisiológica desarrollada en modelos animales hace más de 90 años. En la actualidad se utiliza en la práctica clínica en audiolo-gía y otoneurología, ya que permite evaluar la función coclear, a través del registro del potencial microfónico coclear, y la funcionalidad del nervio auditivo por medio del registro del potencial de acción compuesto. Debido al avance de la tecnología de los implantes cocleares, actualmente existe la posibilidad de realizar mediciones clínicas a tiempo real con electrococleografía intraoperatoria, por lo que se puede monitorizar la función auditiva residual durante la inserción de los electrodos del implante coclear. En este artículo se presenta una revisión narrativa del uso y aplicación clínica de la electrococleografía en la evaluación de pacientes con implante coclear para predecir el desempeño auditivo y la percepción del habla. La literatura muestra que la electroco-cleografía es una técnica que se encuentra, plenamente, vigente para evaluar la función auditiva en pacientes usuarios de implantes cocleares. Si bien las respuestas cocleares han demostrado ser un buen predictor de los umbrales perceptuales auditivos y del habla en silencio en adultos, aún es una técnica que requiere más desarrollo para ser una herramienta clínica que permita predecir el habla en ruido y la función auditiva en niños y adultos mayores.

Electrocochleography is an electrophysiological technique developed in animal models more than 90 years ago. It is currently used in clinical practice in audiology and otoneurology, since it allows the evaluation of cochlear function, through the recording of the cochlear microphonic potentials, and the functionality of the auditory nerve by means of compound action potential recordings. Due to the advancement of cochlear implant technology, there is currently the possibility of real-time clinical measurements with intraoperative electrocochleography, so that residual hearing function can be monitored during the insertion of the cochlear implant electrodes. This article presents a narrative review of the use and clinical application of electrocochleography in the evaluation of patients with cochlear implants to predict auditory performance and speech perception. The literature shows that electrocochleography is a technique that is fully in force to assess hearing function in patients who use cochlear implants. Although cochlear responses have been shown to be a good predictor of auditory perceptual thresholds and speech in quiet in adults, it is still a technique that requires further development to become a clinical tool for predicting speech in noise and auditory function in children and older adults.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implants allow measures of neural function, through Neural response telemetry (NRT) and Auditory nerve recovery function (REC). These help in programming the speech processor and understanding the auditory system. However, not many studies have evaluated and compared these in different regions of the cochlea. OBJECTIVE: Comparing NRT and REC in different regions of the cochlea. METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive and prospective. NRT and REC (through the function of T0 - absolute refractory period, A - amplitude and TAU - time constant of the relative refractory period parameters) were evaluated, in three groups according to the stimulated electrode of the cochlea: apical, medial and basal. RESULTS: 26 adult patients were evaluated, 2 bilateral, totalling 28 ears. Data analysis showed no statistically significant difference between NRT between medial and basal but showed between apical and medial and apical and basal. For T0, there was a significant difference between medial and basal; for A, there was a significant difference between apical and basal and also medial and basal; and for TAU, there was no significant difference. CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in NRT and REC when compared between different regions of the cochlea.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Electrocochleography has recently emerged as a diagnostic tool in cochlear implant surgery, purposing hearing preservation and optimal electrode positioning. OBJECTIVE: In this experimental study, extra-cochlear potentials were obtained during cochlear implant surgery in guinea pigs. The aim was to determine electrophysiological changes indicating cochlear trauma after cochleostomy and after electrode implantation in different insertion depths. METHODS: Normal-hearing guinea pigs (n = 14) were implanted uni- or bilaterally with a multichannel electrode. The extra-cochlear cochlear nerve action potentials were obtained in response to acoustic stimuli at specific frequencies before and after cochleostomy, and after introduction of the electrode bundle. After the electrophysiological experiments, the guinea pigs were euthanized and microtomography was performed, in order to determine the position of the electrode and to calculate of the depth of insertion. Based on the changes of amplitude and thresholds in relation to the stimulus frequency, the electrophysiological data and the position obtained by the microtomography reconstruction were compared. RESULTS: Cochleostomy promoted a small electrophysiological impact, while electrode insertion caused changes in the amplitude of extra-cochlear electrophysiological potentials over a wide range of frequencies, especially in the deepest insertions. There was, however, preservation of the electrical response to low frequency stimuli in most cases, indicating a limited auditory impact in the intraoperative evaluation. The mean insertion depth of the apical electrodes was 5339.56 µm (±306.45 - 6 inserted contacts) and 4447.75 µm (±290.23 - 5 inserted contacts). CONCLUSIONS: The main electrophysiological changes observed during surgical procedures occurred during implantation of the electrode, especially the deepest insertions, whereas the cochleostomy disturbed the potentials to a lesser extent. While hearing loss was often observed apical to the cochlear implant, it was possible to preserve low frequencies after insertion.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To propose a remote, real-time, safe, and easy systematic method to determine electrode electric impedance components: access resistance, polarization capacitance, and polarization resistance. PATIENTS: Patients who received a cochlear implant and had normal cochlear anatomy and complete array insertion were recruited. A total of four adult patients were included and separated in two groups according to implantation time. INTERVENTION: Cochlear implant electrical impedance and its components were measured in all patients by using a novel diagnostic tool: a custom made software running in the patient's computer. Data is transmitted in real time to the investigator. Various stimulation and measuring strategies were used to obtain specific information in each cochlear region. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Access resistance, polarization capacitance, and resistance of each patient were measured. Measurement success rate and required time for the patient were recorded. RESULTS: Access resistance, polarization capacitance, and resistance were obtained in different modes, thus in every specific region of the cochlea. All measurements were successful. Each measurement took approximately 7 minutes and was transmitted in real time to the investigators. CONCLUSION: Routine use of this tool may allow constant assessment of cochlear health and could be eventually used to monitor the effect of drugs in the inner ear. This methodology provides an in vivo "electrical view" of the inside of the implanted cochlea.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Abstract Introduction The literature shows that there are anatomical changes on the temporal bone anatomy during the first four years of life in children. Therefore, we decided to evaluate the temporal bone anatomy regarding the cochlear implant surgery in stillbirths between 32 and 40 weeks of gestational age using computed tomography to simulate the trajectory of the drill to the scala timpani avoiding vital structures. Objectives To measure the distances of the simulated trajectory to the facial recess, cochlea, ossicular chain and tympanic membrane, while performing the minimally invasive cochlear implant technique, using the Improvise imaging software (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, US). Methods An experimental study with 9 stillbirth specimens, with gestational ages ranging between 32 and 40 weeks, undergoing tomographic evaluation with individualization and reconstruction of the labyrinth, facial nerve, ossicular chain, tympanic membrane and cochlea followed by drill path definition to the scala tympani. Improvise was used for the computed tomography (CT) evaluation and for the reconstruction of the structures and trajectory of the drill. Results Range of the distance of the trajectory to the facial nerve: 0.58 to 1.71mm. to the ossicular chain: 0.38 to 1.49 mm; to the tympanic membrane: 0.85 to 1.96 mm; total range of the distance of the trajectory: 5.92 to 12.65 mm. Conclusion The measurements of the relationship between the drill and the anatomical structures of the middle ear and the simulation of the trajectory showed that the middle ear cavity at 32 weeks was big enough for surgical procedures such as cochlear implants. Although cochlear implantation at birth is not an indication yet, this study shows that the technique may be an option in the future.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to evaluate whether there is a difference in the degree of intracochlear trauma when the cochlear implant electrode arrays is inserted through different quadrants of the round window membrane. BACKGROUND: The benefits of residual hearing preservation in cochlear implant recipients have promoted the development of atraumatic surgeries. Minimal trauma during electrode insertion is crucial for residual hearing preservation. METHODS: In total, 25 fresh human temporal bones were subjected to mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy. The cochlear implant electrode array was inserted through the anterosuperior quadrant of the round window membrane in 50% of the bones and through the anteroinferior quadrant in the remaining 50%. The temporal bones were dehydrated, embedded in epoxy, serially polished, stained, viewed through a stereomicroscope, and photographed with the electrode arrays in situ. The resulting images were analyzed for signs of intracochlear trauma. RESULTS: Histological examinations revealed varying degrees of damage to the intracochlear structures, although the incidence and severity of intracochlear trauma were not influenced by the quadrant of insertion. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and severity of intracochlear trauma were similar in all samples, irrespective of electrode array insertion through the anterosuperior or anteroinferior quadrant of the round window membrane.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implants have been used for almost 30 years as a device for the rehabilitation of individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss. One of the important aspects of cochlear implantation is the type of electrode selected and proper insertion of the electrode array in scala tympani to minimize cochlear damage. The HiFocus Helix™ electrode is a precurved design aimed at placing the electrode contacts close to the spiral ganglion cells in the modiolus. The prescribed insertion techniques are intended to minimize the likelihood of damage to the basilar membrane or lateral wall of the cochlea. CASE PRESENTATION: To describe the first insertion of a HiFocus Helix™ electrode in Brazil exposing surgical particularities and device details in a patient with profound hearing loss, due to Mondini's dysplasia. CONCLUSION: No problems were encountered during the surgical procedure. The patient experienced improvement in hearing thresholds and speech perception. The HiFocus Helix™ electrode proved easy to insert and provided expected hearing benefits for the patient. This manuscript indicates that the HiResolution™ Bionic Ear System with HiFocus Helix™ electrode comprise a cochlear implant system that is practical and beneficial for the treatment of severe-to-profound hearing loss.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

HYPOTHESIS: The physical relationship between anatomical landmarks such as the tympanic portion of the facial nerve and the orientation of the middle turn of the cochlea are sufficiently constant to provide guidance to surgeons performing cochlear implantation in the ossified cochlea. BACKGROUND: Placing an implant in an ossified cochlea is technically difficult. The surgeon needs to drill two tunnels through the promontory bone to insert electrode arrays in the region of the basal and middle turns of the cochlea. However, few studies describe the orientation of these tunnels or how to use anatomical landmarks to guide the surgeon during their creation. This problem is particularly true for the superior (middle turn) tunnel. DESIGN: Twenty human temporal bones from adult cadavers were analyzed. They were dissected with exposure of all middle ear structures, followed by the removal of the tympanic ring, tympanic membrane, malleus, and incus. We measured the angle between the tympanic segment of the fallopian canal and a line passing through the lower portion of the middle turn of the cochlea. RESULTS: The measured angles varied from 123 and 152 degrees with an average of 133.85 degrees and the standard deviation of ± 6.83 degrees. CONCLUSION: The tunnel for the middle turn should be created with an inclination of about 134 degrees in relation to the tympanic segment of the facial nerve.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe a technique to obtain guinea pigs cochlear fluids and measure nitric oxide (NO) concentration. METHODS: Six guinea pigs were used and sacrificed. The cochlear fluids collected for measurement of NO, performed by chemiluminescence (NOA 280). RESULTS: Through the chemiluminescence was possible to analyze the concentration of NO in cochlear fluids obtained. Average levels of nitric oxide from guinea pigs was 12.55 µM. CONCLUSION: It is possible to obtain nitric oxide cochlear fluids, with this technique and nitric oxide concentration measure by chemiluminescence, a quantitative and more precise method.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe a technique to obtain guinea pigs cochlear fluids and measure nitric oxide (NO) concentration. METHODS: Six guinea pigs were used and sacrificed. The cochlear fluids collected for measurement of NO, performed by chemiluminescence (NOA 280). RESULTS: Through the chemiluminescence was possible to analyze the concentration of NO in cochlear fluids obtained. Average levels of nitric oxide from guinea pigs was 12.55 µM. CONCLUSION: It is possible to obtain nitric oxide cochlear fluids, with this technique and nitric oxide concentration measure by chemiluminescence, a quantitative and more precise method.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

This article presents the endoscopic anatomy of the retrotympanum and its relationship to other important anatomic landmarks in the middle ear to provide understanding of its importance and relevance during surgeries. A well-detailed tour of the retrotympanum, its associated structures, variability of anatomic structures, and surgical relevance is presented.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: There are two techniques for cochlear implant (CI) electrode placement: cochleostomy and the round window (RW) approach. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare neural response telemetry (NRT) results immediately after surgery to check for possible differences on auditory nerve stimulation between these two techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cross-sectional study. Twenty-three patients were enrolled. Six patients underwent surgery by cochleostomy and 17 had it through the RW approach. RESULTS: Mean charge units (MCU) for high frequency sounds: patients submitted to the RW approach had a mean value of 190.4 (± 29.2) while cochleostomy patients averaged 187.8 (± 32.7); p = 0.71. MCU for mid frequency sounds: patients submitted to the RW approach had a mean value of 192.5 (± 22) while cochleostomy patients averaged 178.5 (± 18.5); p = 0.23. MCU for low frequency sounds: patients submitted to the RW approach had a mean value of 183.3 (± 25) while cochleostomy patients averaged 163.8 (± 19.3); p = 0.19. CONCLUSION: This study showed no differences in the action potential of the distal portion of the auditory nerve in patients with multichannel cochlear implants submitted to surgery by cochleostomy or through the RW approach, using the implant itself to generate stimuli and record responses. Both techniques equally stimulate the cochlear nerve. Therefore, the choice of approach can be made based on the surgeon's own preference and experience.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

Existem duas técnicas para inserção dos eletrodos do implante coclear (IC): Via cocleostomia ou via janela redonda (JR). OBJETIVO: Comparar a telemetria de resposta neural (NRT) no pós-operatório imediato, verificando se há diferenças na estimulação do nervo auditivo entre estas duas técnicas. MÉTODOS: Prospectivo e transversal. Foram avaliados 23 pacientes. Seis submetidos à cirurgia via cocleostomia e 17 via JR. RESULTADOS: Comparação das unidades de corrente médias (UCM) para sons agudos: via JR com média de 190,4 (± 29,2) e via cocleostomia 187,8 (± 32,7), p = 0,71. Comparação das UCM para sons intermediários: via JR, média de 192,5 (± 22) e via cocleostomia 178,5 (± 18.5), p = 0,23. Comparação das UCM para sons graves: via JR, média de 183,3 (± 25) e via cocleostomia 163,8 (± 19,3), p = 0,19. CONCLUSÃO: Este estudo não mostrou diferença na captação do potencial de ação da porção distal do nervo auditivo em pacientes usuários do implante coclear multicanal submetidos à cirurgia via cocleostomia ou via JR, utilizando o próprio implante para eliciar o estímulo e gravar as respostas. Portanto, ambas as técnicas estimulam de maneira igual o nervo coclear, e baseado nisto conclui-se, também, que realizar o implante coclear via cocleostomia ou RW é uma escolha que depende da experiência cirúrgica e opção do cirurgião.

There are two techniques for cochlear implant (CI) electrode placement: cochleostomy and the round window (RW) approach. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare neural response telemetry (NRT) results immediately after surgery to check for possible differences on auditory nerve stimulation between these two techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective cross-sectional study. Twenty-three patients were enrolled. Six patients underwent surgery by cochleostomy and 17 had it through the RW approach. RESULTS: Mean charge units (MCU) for high frequency sounds: patients submitted to the RW approach had a mean value of 190.4 (± 29.2) while cochleostomy patients averaged 187.8 (± 32.7); p = 0.71. MCU for mid frequency sounds: patients submitted to the RW approach had a mean value of 192.5 (± 22) while cochleostomy patients averaged 178.5 (± 18.5); p = 0.23. MCU for low frequency sounds: patients submitted to the RW approach had a mean value of 183.3 (± 25) while cochleostomy patients averaged 163.8 (± 19.3); p = 0.19. CONCLUSION: This study showed no differences in the action potential of the distal portion of the auditory nerve in patients with multichannel cochlear implants submitted to surgery by cochleostomy or through the RW approach, using the implant itself to generate stimuli and record responses. Both techniques equally stimulate the cochlear nerve. Therefore, the choice of approach can be made based on the surgeon's own preference and experience.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: The combined approach technique (CAT) is a variation of the classical the mastoidectomy-posterior tympanotomy technique (MPTA) that combines a transcanal approach to cochleostomy with a reduced posterior tympanotomy for insertion of electrodes. AIM: To compare and evaluate long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes obtained with the CAT and with MPTA approach in patients submitted to cochlear implant (CI) surgery. DESIGN: series study. METHODS: Patients who underwent CI using CAT or MPTA at a Brazilian center were followed in a cohort study. Main outcomes were complications,audiometric performance and radiological evaluation of electrode position. RESULTS: Fourty-four patients were implanted using CAT and 31 MPTA. There were no cases of facial nerve paralysis, mastoiditis, cholesteatoma or cerebrospinal fluid leaks after 3.4±1.0 years. Radiological evaluation of electrode position revealed that the median number of electrodes outside the cochlea was 0 in CAT and 3 in MPTA groups (p < 0.001). There were no differences between both surgical approaches in terms of mean pure-tone thresholds with CI at all frequencies. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up data showed that the transcanal route to cochleostomy, combined with a reduced posterior tympanotomy, is a safe alternative approach in cochlear implant surgery, with no related major complications and fewer cases of electrode migration when compared with the MPTA. These findings encourage the use of the transcanal route to cochleostomy as an alternative approach option.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

A técnica de acesso combinado (TAC) ao implante coclear (IC) é uma variação da técnica clássica de mastoidectomia e timpanotomia posterior (MPTA). A TAC combina um acesso transcanal à cocleostomia com uma timpanotomia posterior reduzida para a inserção dos eletrodos. OBJETIVO: Avaliar e comparar a segurança e efetividade em longo prazo alcançados com a TAC e MPTA em pacientes submetidos a IC em um centro brasileiro. Desenho científico: Estudo de série. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Pacientes submetidos a IC usando TAC e MPTA foram acompanhados em um estudo de coorte. Os desfechos avaliados foram complicações, avaliação audiométrica e radiológica pós-operatórias. RESULTADOS: Quarenta e quatro pacientes foram implantados usando a TAC e 31 usando MPTA. Não houve casos de paralisia facial, mastoidite, colesteatoma ou fístula após 3,4±1,0 anos. A avaliação radiológica da posição dos eletrodos a mediana de eletrodos fora da cóclea foi de 0 no grupo TAC e de 3 no MPTA (p < 0,001). Não houve diferença entre os grupos em termos de desempenho audiológico no pós-operatório. CONCLUSÃO: A cocleostomia via transcanal combinada com uma timpanotomia posterior reduzida é um acesso alternativo ao IC que demonstrou segurança e menor migração de eletrodos em longo prazo. Esses achados encorajam o uso da via transcanal para a cocleostomia como uma opção alternativa de acesso ao IC.

The combined approach technique (CAT) is a variation of the classical the mastoidectomy-posterior tympanotomy technique (MPTA) that combines a transcanal approach to cochleostomy with a reduced posterior tympanotomy for insertion of electrodes. AIM: To compare and evaluate long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes obtained with the CAT and with MPTA approach in patients submitted to cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Design: series study. METHODS: Patients who underwent CI using CAT or MPTA at a Brazilian center were followed in a cohort study. Main outcomes were complications,audiometric performance and radiological evaluation of electrode position. RESULTS: Fourty-four patients were implanted using CAT and 31 MPTA. There were no cases of facial nerve paralysis, mastoiditis, cholesteatoma or cerebrospinal fluid leaks after 3.4±1.0 years. Radiological evaluation of electrode position revealed that the median number of electrodes outside the cochlea was 0 in CAT and 3 in MPTA groups (p < 0.001). There were no differences between both surgical approaches in terms of mean pure-tone thresholds with CI at all frequencies. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up data showed that the transcanal route to cochleostomy, combined with a reduced posterior tympanotomy, is a safe alternative approach in cochlear implant surgery, with no related major complications and fewer cases of electrode migration when compared with the MPTA. These findings encourage the use of the transcanal route to cochleostomy as an alternative approach option.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

The traditional access route for cochlear implantation was initially proposed by William House in 1961. Alternatives to this surgical approach have been suggested by many authors. The combined approach technique (CAT) is a variation of the traditional mastoidectomy-posterior tympanotomy method, which uses a transcanal approach to cochleostomy combined with a small mastoidectomy and an equally small posterior tympanotomy for the insertion of electrodes. This paper presents a detailed description of this alternative procedure, reporting our experience with 50 cases, and adds our contribution regarding possible advantages and implications of using a transcanal cochleostomy. The subjects had profound and severe bilateral hearing loss and had not benefited from external hearing aids. They underwent cochlear implantation at Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre from May 2003. The median follow-up was 29 months. All cases were successfully implanted using CAT. No major complications, such as facial paralysis or paresis, meningitis, cholesteatoma, or cerebrospinal fluid leaks, were observed in any patient. The CAT is a safe and efficient variation of cochlear implantation surgery, which is especially appropriate if cochlear calcification or malformations are present, or whenever cochleostomy has to be performed anteriorly, and when the position of the facial nerve prevents an adequate posterior tympanotomy.

Asunto(s)

RESUMEN

UNLABELLED: Cochlear ossification, mainly secondary to meningitis, prevents the complete conventional cochlear implant insertion. Implants with two electrode bundles shorter than the conventional ones were specifically developed for ossified cochleas. However, during surgery there is a high risk of damaging the internal carotid artery (ICA). Therefore, measuring cochleostomy depth in order to insert the two electrode bundles would greatly increase the procedure's safety. AIMS: 1) Find the distances between cochleostomies and ICA in cadaver temporal bones. 2) Design an instrument that can be used in cochlear implant surgery to introduce an implant with two bundles of electrodes. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental prospective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 21 temporal bones from cadavers we performed: 1) canal wall down mastoidectomy; 2) cochleostomy in the cochlear basal and middle turns; 3) ICA identification; 4) Length determination between the cochleostomies and the artery. RESULTS: the average distance +/- standard deviation obtained for the upper tunnel was of 8.2 +/- 1.1 mm and for the lower tunnel it was of 8.1+/- 1.3 mm. The shortest distance found was of 6.5 mm for the upper tunnel and 6.0 mm for the lower tunnel. CONCLUSION: Despite the values calculated, we concluded that the best value to be considered in creating a surgical instrument are the minimum lengths obtained for each one of the cochlear turns, because this is the safest way to avoid damaging the ICA, that can be fatal.

Asunto(s)