RESUMEN
Introduction: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy approved for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In the phase 3 trial, CARTITUDE-4 (NCT04181827), cilta-cel demonstrated improved efficacy vs. standard of care (SOC; daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone [DPd] or pomalidomide plus bortezomib and dexamethasone [PVd]) with a ≥ complete response (≥CR) rate of 73.1% vs. 21.8%. Methods: A cost-per-responder model was developed to assess the value of cilta-cel and SOC (87% DPd and 13% PVd) based on the CARTITUDE-4 trial data from a US mixed payer perspective (76.7% commercial, 23.3% Medicare). The model was developed using progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and ≥CR endpoints from CARTITUDE-4 over a period of 25.4 months. Inpatient stays, outpatient visits, drug acquisition, administration, and monitoring costs were included. The base-case model assumed an inpatient setting for each cilta-cel infusion; another scenario included 30% outpatient and 70% inpatient infusions. Costs of managing grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) and grade 1-4 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity were included. Subsequent therapy costs were incurred after disease progression; terminal care costs were considered upon death events. Outcomes included total cost per treated patient, total cost per complete responder, and cost per month in PFS between cilta-cel and SOC. Costs were adjusted to 2024 US dollars. Results: Total cost per treated patient, total cost per complete responder, and total cost per month in PFS were estimated at $704,641, $963,941, and $30,978 for cilta-cel, respectively, and $840,730, $3,856,559, and $42,520 for SOC over the 25.4-month period. Cost drivers included treatment acquisition costs before progression and subsequent treatment costs ($451,318 and $111,637 for cilta-cel; $529,795 and $265,167 for SOC). A scenario analysis in which 30% of patients received an outpatient infusion (assuming the same payer mix) showed a lower cost per complete responder for cilta-cel ($956,523) than those with an infusion in the inpatient setting exclusively. Discussion: This analysis estimated that cost per treated patient, cost per complete responder, and cost per month in PFS for cilta-cel were remarkably lower than for DPd or PVd, highlighting the substantial clinical and economic benefit of cilta-cel for patients with RRMM.
Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Talidomida , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/economía , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Talidomida/economía , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/uso terapéutico , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/economíaRESUMEN
Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) have previously been established as standard-of-care induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). More recently, randomized phase 3 data have demonstrated the benefit of the addition of daratumumab (Dara-RVd) to the RVd backbone in terms of improved both depth of response and long-term survival benefit as measured by progression-free survival (PFS). Our group has previously published on a historical cohort of 1000 NDMM patients uniformly treated with RVd induction with impressive both PFS and overall survival. Here, we present a comparative analysis of our RVd cohort with a recent cohort of 326 patients induced with Dara-RVd at our institution with intent to transplant. This analysis demonstrates the utility of this regimen in real-world clinical practice and provides additional insights into D-RVd performance in patient subsets often underrepresented in clinical trials, as well as the impact of daratumumab in maintenance for NDMM patients.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD), and bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD), are commonly used in induction regimens for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in China. This real-world study enrolled 390 patients, 195 receiving VRD and 195 receiving PAD induction. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and stringent complete remission/complete remission. Across the entire cohort, VRD demonstrated significantly improved five-year overall survival (OS) (74% vs. 59%, p = 0.0024) and five-year PFS (67% vs. 37%, p = 0.0018) compared to PAD. Notably, the median OS and PFS were not reached for VRD-treated patients, while they were 77 months (60-not reached [NR]) and 46 months (36-NR), respectively, for PAD. In patients with standard-risk cytogenetics, VRD showed superior five-year OS (83% vs. 58%, p = 0.0038) and PFS (78% vs. 48%, p = 0.0091) compared to PAD. However, these differences were not statistically significant in high-risk patients. For transplanted patients, VRD was associated with superior five-year OS (91% vs. 67%, p = 0.014) and PFS (79% vs. 47%, p = 0.015) compared to PAD. In non-transplanted patients, VRD showed a trend towards improved five-year OS (p = 0.085) and PFS (p = 0.073) compared to the PAD group. In conclusion, VRD displayed superior OS and PFS outcomes in standard-risk patients and those who underwent transplantation. These findings suggest potential advantages of VRD over PAD in real-world clinical settings for NDMM treatment. However, due to the imbalance in transplantation rates between the VRD and PAD groups, limitations in testing for high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA), and the difference between the received cycles and salvage therapies, the conclusions of this study should be interpreted with caution.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Doxorrubicina , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of domestic bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) . Methods: This multicenter, prospective, single-arm clinical study included 126 patients with NDMM admitted to seven hospitals between December 2019 and January 2022. All patients received domestic bortezomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (BLD regimen), and the efficacy, prognostic factors, and safety were analyzed. Results: Among the 126 patients with NDMM, 118 completed four cycles of treatment, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 93.22% (110/118) and a ≥very good partial response (VGPR) rate of 68.64% (81/118). Ultimately, 114 patients completed at least eight cycles of treatment, with an ORR of 92.98% (106/114) and a ≥VGPR rate of 77.19% (88/114). Eighteen patients underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after completing 6-8 cycles of the BLD regimen, with an ORR of 100% (18/18) and a ≥VGPR rate of 88.9% (16/18). The proportion of patients achieving ≥VGPR increased with the treatment duration, and factors such as staging and age did not significantly affect efficacy. Single-factor analysis showed that R2-ISS stage â ¢/â £, blood calcium >2.27 mmol/L, and failure to achieve VGPR after six cycles were adverse prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) (P<0.05), whereas failure to achieve VGPR after six cycles was an adverse prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) (P<0.001). Multifactor analysis demonstrated that failure to achieve VGPR after six cycles is an independent adverse prognostic factor for PFS (P=0.002). The incidence of hematologic adverse reactions was 16.7% (19/114), and nonhematologic adverse reactions were mainly mild to moderate, with no significant cardiac or renal adverse reactions observed. Conclusion: The BLD regimen is effective in treating NDMM, in which patients with high-risk genetic features are still achieving a high ≥VGPR rate, and the overall safety is good.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
TEMPI syndrome is a rare, acquired disorder with multisystemic manifestations. It is classified as a plasma cell disorder and is characterized by telangiectasias, erythrocytosis, monoclonal gammopathy, perinephric fluid collections and intrapulmonary shunt. Even though TEMPI's pathophysiology remains elusive, it responds to anti-myeloma therapy indicating that the monoclonal protein or clone plays a key role. We present a challenging case of a 73-year-old man with erythrocytosis and deteriorating renal function with nephrotic-range proteinuria in whom after extensive work up, the diagnosis of TEMPI syndrome was made. He was received treatment with daratumumab-bortezomib-cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (Dara-VCD) and achieved a hematological and clinical response. We also report preliminary data on a multiplex assay for cytokines and growth factors for two patients with TEMPI syndrome and note lower levels for non-specific innate immunity related cytokines. A direct link between renal impairment and TEMPI syndrome is not currently established; cytokine deregulation could potentially be involved in the ischemic changes observed in the renal biopsy of our patient.
Asunto(s)
Policitemia , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Policitemia/diagnóstico , Policitemia/terapia , Paraproteinemias/diagnóstico , Paraproteinemias/complicaciones , Síndrome , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The randomized, phase 2 GRIFFIN study (NCT02874742) evaluated daratumumab plus lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We present final post hoc analyses (median follow-up, 49.6 months) of clinically relevant subgroups, including patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) per revised definition (del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], t[14;20], and/or gain/amp[1q21]). Patients received 4 induction cycles (D-RVd/RVd), high-dose therapy/transplant, 2 consolidation cycles (D-RVd/RVd), and lenalidomide±daratumumab maintenance (≤ 2 years). Minimal residual disease-negativity (10-5) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd in patients ≥ 65 years (67.9% vs 17.9%), with HRCAs (54.8% vs 32.4%), and with gain/amp(1q21) (61.8% vs 28.6%). D-RVd showed a trend toward improved progression-free survival versus RVd (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) in patients ≥ 65 years (0.29 [0.06-1.48]), with HRCAs (0.38 [0.14-1.01]), and with gain/amp(1q21) (0.42 [0.14-1.27]). In the functional high-risk subgroup (not MRD negative at the end of consolidation), the hazard ratio was 0.82 (0.35-1.89). Among patients ≥ 65 years, grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd (88.9% vs 77.8%), as were TEAEs leading to discontinuation of ≥ 1 treatment component (37.0% vs 25.9%). One D-RVd patient died due to an unrelated TEAE. These results support the addition of daratumumab to RVd in transplant-eligible patients with high-risk NDMM. Video Abstract.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Mieloma Múltiple , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnósticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Proteasome inhibitors (PIs), which cause cell death via tumor suppressor and pro-apoptotic proteins, are integral to treatment of many hematologic malignancies but are limited by their gastrointestinal adverse effects. Evidence regarding these PI-related adverse effects is scant. In this study, we evaluated gastrointestinal adverse events caused by PIs and compared gastrointestinal toxicities between bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of cancer patients treated with PIs at a tertiary care cancer center to investigate the clinical characteristics of PI-related gastrointestinal adverse events. RESULTS: Our sample comprised 973 patients with PI exposure and stool studies ordered between January 2017 and December 2022. Of these, 193 patients (20%) had PI-related gastrointestinal toxicity based on clinical symptoms and stool study results. The most common symptom was diarrhea, present in 169 (88% of those with gastrointestinal toxicity). Twenty-two (11%) required hospitalization, and 71 (37%) developed recurrence of symptoms. Compared to bortezomib or carfilzomib, ixazomib had a longer interval from PI initiation to the onset of gastrointestinal symptoms (313 days vs 58 days vs 89 days, p = 0.002) and a significantly lower percentage of diarrhea-predominant presentation of gastrointestinal toxicity (71% vs 96% vs 91%, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: While PI-related gastrointestinal toxicities have various presentations and courses based on different regimens, the vast majority of patients presented with milder disease behavior. Despite a considerably high rate of hospitalization and recurrence after treatment necessitating optimization of clinical management, our cohort demonstrates favorable outcomes without long-term consequences.
Asunto(s)
Compuestos de Boro , Bortezomib , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Glicina , Inhibidores de Proteasoma , Humanos , Inhibidores de Proteasoma/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Boro/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Boro/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Glicina/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/inducido químicamente , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Multiple myeloma (MM) with secondary amyloidosis (AL) is a rare clonal plasma cell proliferation disease, which causes dysfunction of multiple organs and tissues. We report a case of dysphagia as the first symptom in a patient with MM and secondary AL. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient was a 73-year-old female, was admitted to our hospital, because of progressive dysphagia for 4 months and limb weakness for 1 month. DIAGNOSES: The bone marrow smear and pathology diagnosis revealed the presence of MM, while the biceps myopathy diagnosis indicated AL. INTERVENTIONS: The VCD regimen consisted of bortezomib at a dosage of 1.9 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22, cyclophosphamide 0.4 g on days 1, 8, and 15, and dexamethasone at a dosage of 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The patient simultaneously received comprehensive treatment including anti-infective therapy, enhanced cardiac function, and nutritional support. OUTCOMES: The M protein in the blood and urine protein were negative, indicating a reduction in bone marrow plasma cells to 2%. Flow cytometric analysis revealed a minimal percentage 0.04%. As a result, complete remission was achieved. LESSONS: The clinical manifestations of MM exhibit a wide range, with the symptoms of secondary injury causing significant disturbing, while the atypical symptoms of extramedullary manifestations pose challenges in diagnosing the disease.
Asunto(s)
Amiloidosis , Trastornos de Deglución , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Femenino , Anciano , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Amiloidosis/complicaciones , Amiloidosis/diagnóstico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificaciónAsunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes , Dexametasona , Mutación , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B , Rituximab , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Bicíclicos Heterocíclicos con Puentes/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/genética , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras B/patología , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genética , Inotuzumab Ozogamicina , Niño , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , FemeninoRESUMEN
Bortezomib is regularly used as frontline therapy for systemic AL amyloidosis. We assess the efficacy of second-line daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone (DVD) in AL amyloidosis in bortezomib-exposed patients. A total of 116 patients treated with second-line DVD were identified from a prospective observational study of newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis (ALchemy). DVD was initiated in both the relapsed setting or where there was an inadequate response defined as very good partial response (VGPR) or VGPR with organ progression/lack of organ improvement. A complete response (CR)/VGPR to second-line DVD was achieved in 81 (69.8%) patients. A CR/VGPR was achieved in 67 (79.7%) in those who achieved a VGPR/CR to first line versus 14/32 (43.8%) in those who did not. Where DVD was initiated due to an inadequate response to first line (vs. at relapse), the median event-free survival (EFS) was 18 vs. 34 months (p = 0.002). If a CR/VGPR was achieved to DVD, the 2-year EFS was still lower in those with prior inadequate response 54% vs. 66% (p = 0.062). DVD is an efficacious second-line treatment in systemic AL amyloidosis in a bortezomib-exposed population. However, the response to DVD is poorer in those with an inadequate response to first-line bortezomib.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas , Humanos , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Recurrencia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Exosomes have emerged as promising vehicles for delivering therapeutic cargoes to specific cells or tissues, owing to their superior biocompatibility, reduced immunogenicity, and enhanced targeting capabilities compared with conventional drug delivery systems. In this study, we developed a delivery platform using exosomes derived from monocytes, specifically designed for targeted delivery of bortezomib (Btz) to multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Our approach involved the genetic modification of monocytes to express antibodies targeting B-cell maturation antigen (anti-BCMA), because BCMA selectively expresses on myeloma cells. This modified anti-BCMA was then efficiently incorporated into the monocyte-derived exosomes. These adapted exosomes effectively encapsulated Btz, leading to enhanced drug accessibility within MM cells and sustained intracellular accumulation over an extended period. Remarkably, our results demonstrated that anti-BCMA-modified exosome-loaded Btz (anti-BCMA-Exo-Btz) outperformed free Btz in vitro, exhibiting a more potent myeloma-suppressive effect. In orthotopic MM xenograft models, anti-BCMA-Exo-Btz exhibited a significant antitumor effect compared with free Btz. Furthermore, it demonstrated remarkable specificity in targeting Btz to myeloma cells in vivo. Importantly, we observed no significant histological damage in mice treated with anti-BCMA-Exo-Btz and a slight effect on peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In addition, our study highlighted the multifunctional potential of monocyte exosomes, which induced cell apoptosis, mediated immune responses, and enhanced the osteogenic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells. In conclusion, our study suggests that exosomes modified with targeting ligands hold therapeutic promise for delivering Btz to myelomas, offering substantial potential for clinical applications.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B , Bortezomib , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Exosomas , Mieloma Múltiple , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Exosomas/metabolismo , Bortezomib/farmacología , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Línea Celular Tumoral , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Monocitos/metabolismoRESUMEN
PI3K-δ inhibitors have shown impressive activity in lymphoid malignancies but have been hampered by autoimmune and infectious toxicities, leading to market withdrawals. We previously demonstrated activity of the PI3K-δγ inhibitor duvelisib in T cell lymphomas (TCLs) that was associated with inflammatory adverse events. As reported here, we conducted a phase 1b/2a study of duvelisib in combination with either romidepsin (n = 66) or bortezomib (n = 32) in patients with relapsed/refractory TCL and found that the addition of romidepsin, but not bortezomib, appeared to increase efficacy while attenuating PI3K inhibitor-driven toxicity. The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the safety and maximum tolerated dose of duvelisib, which was 75 mg twice daily when combined with romidepsin versus 25 mg twice daily when combined with bortezomib. The most common adverse events were neutropenia (42%, 25/59) and fatigue (37%, 22/59) in patients treated with duvelisib and romidepsin and diarrhea (48%, 11/23) and neutropenia (30%, 7/23) in patients treated with duvelisib and bortezomib. Duvelisib and romidepsin resulted in less grade 3/4 hepatotoxicity (14%, 8/59) compared to 40% (14/35) in our previous study with duvelisib monotherapy. This was associated with reductions in circulating inflammatory mediators and myeloid cell inflammatory gene expression. Secondary endpoints of overall and complete response rates were 55% (35/64) and 34% (22/64) for patients treated with duvelisib and romidepsin and 34% (11/32) and 13% (4/32) for patients treated with duvelisib and bortezomib. Among patients with peripheral T cell lymphomas (PTCLs), overall and complete response rates of duvelisib and romidepsin were 56% (27/48) and 44% (21/48), respectively, with exploratory analyses showing increased response rates in patients with a follicular helper T cell subtype. These findings support further development of combined PI3K and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition in TCLs and suggest a unique strategy to enable PI3K inhibitor-based combinations for additional patient populations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02783625 .
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Depsipéptidos , Linfoma de Células T , Humanos , Depsipéptidos/efectos adversos , Depsipéptidos/uso terapéutico , Depsipéptidos/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Adulto , Linfoma de Células T/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células T/patología , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Isoquinolinas , PurinasRESUMEN
CD38-targeting immunotherapy is approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) that are transplant ineligible (TI) and is considered the best standard of care (SOC). To improve current SOC, we evaluated the added value of weekly bortezomib (V) to isatuximab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IsaRd versus Isa-VRd). This Intergroupe Francophone of Myeloma phase 3 study randomized 270 patients with NDMM that were TI, aged 65-79 years, to IsaRd versus Isa-VRd arms. The primary endpoint was a minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate at 10-5 by next-generation sequencing at 18 months from randomization. Key secondary endpoints included response rates, MRD assessment rates, survival and safety. The 18-month MRD negativity rates at 10-5 were reported in 35 patients (26%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 19-34) in IsaRd versus 71 (53%, 95% CI 44-61) in Isa-VRd (odds ratio for MRD negativity 3.16, 95% CI 1.89-5.28, P < 0.0001). The MRD benefit was consistent across subgroups at 10-5 and 10-6, and was already observed at month 12. The proportion of patients with complete response or better at 18 months was higher with Isa-VRd (58% versus 33%; P < 0.0001), as was the proportion of MRD negativity and complete response or better (37% versus 17%; P = 0.0003). At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, no difference was observed for survival times (immature data). The addition of weekly bortezomib did not significantly affect the relative dose intensity of IsaRd. Isa-VRd significantly increased MRD endpoints, including the 18-month negativity rate at 10-5, the primary endpoint, compared with IsaRd. This study proposes Isa-VRd as a new SOC for patients with NDMM that are TI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04751877 .
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Neoplasia Residual , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has significantly improved over the past ten years because of several innovative treatments, including the proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) like Thalidomide and Lenalidomide. The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of Bortezomib-based regimens on survival state of MM patients. This retrospective study included 204 newly diagnosed MM patients who were registered at Nanakali Hospital for Blood Diseases and Cancer, Erbil- Iraq, between April 2008 and April 2022. The patients were split into two primary groups: those receiving treatment with Bortezomib and those not. Clinical and laboratory data, treatment type, responsiveness to induction therapy, and survival results were examined in the enrolled patients' medical records. The mean patient age was 60 years, males constituted 55.8% of the included patients. At the time of diagnosis, 98 individuals (48%) had stage 3 illness. Except for the LDH, which was noticeably higher in the non-Bortezomib group, the patients laboratory results did not substantially change between the Bortezomib and non-Bortezomib groups (p = 0.001). In patients treated with Bortezomib, the complete response (CR) rate following induction was substantially greater (35.2%) than in those treated without Bortezomib (9.1%). Compared to the non-Bortezomib group, the median survival time of the Bortezomib group was considerably greater (p < 0.001). Bortezomib has a significant role in inducing a CR before bone marrow (BM) transplantation, and it has a significant role in the survival outcome in MM.
Asunto(s)
Bortezomib , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Daratumumab-based regimens are the new standard of care for newly diagnosed patients with AL amyloidosis based on the results of the ANDROMEDA study. However, real-world data on daratumumab efficacy in upfront therapy in unselected patients are scanty. In the framework of a prospective observational study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of daratumumab in 88 newly diagnosed patients, including subjects with IIIb cardiac stage (26%) or myeloma defining events (29%). Daratumumab was administered with bortezomib in 50 (56%) patients, lenalidomide in 31 (35%), and monotherapy in 7 (8%). The rate of serious adverse events was low (16%). The overall hematologic response rate was 75% with 52 (59%) patients attaining at least a very good partial response (VGPR) at six months. Amongst patients evaluable for organ response, the rate of cardiac and renal responses at 6 months was 31% and 21%, respectively. Comparing stage IIIb patients with the remaining ones, the rate of profound hematologic response was not significantly different (≥VGPR 57% vs. 59%, p 0.955) likewise the rate of cardiac (33% vs. 30%, p 0.340) and renal (40% vs. 16%, p 0.908) responses. Daratumumab-based regimens demonstrated to be safe and effective in treatment-naïve AL amyloidosis even in advanced stage disease.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anciano , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Prospectivos , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Adulto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Frailty in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients is associated with treatment-related toxicity, which negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Currently, data on changes in HRQoL of frail and intermediate-fit MM patients during active treatment and post-treatment follow-up are absent. METHODS: The HOVON123 study (NTR4244) was a phase II trial in which NDMM patients ≥ 75 years were treated with nine dose-adjusted cycles of Melphalan-Prednisone-Bortezomib (MPV). Two HRQoL instruments (EORTC QLQ-C30 and -MY20) were obtained before start of treatment, after 3 and 9 months of treatment and 6 and 12 months after treatment for patients who did not yet start second-line treatment. HRQoL changes and/or differences in frail and intermediate-fit patients (IMWG frailty score) were reported only when both statistically significant (p < 0.005) and clinically relevant (>MID). RESULTS: 137 frail and 71 intermediate-fit patients were included in the analysis. Compliance was high and comparable in both groups. At baseline, frail patients reported lower global health status, lower physical functioning scores and more fatigue and pain compared to intermediate-fit patients. Both groups improved in global health status and future perspective; polyneuropathy complaints worsened over time. Frail patients improved over time in physical functioning, fatigue and pain. Improvement in global health status occurred earlier than in intermediate-fit patients. CONCLUSION: HRQoL improved during anti-myeloma treatment in both intermediate-fit and frail MM patients. In frail patients, improvement occurred faster and, in more domains, which was retained during follow-up. This implies that physicians should not withhold safe and effective therapies from frail patients in fear of HRQoL deterioration.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Fragilidad , Mieloma Múltiple , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/psicología , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Melfalán/efectos adversos , Melfalán/uso terapéutico , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Anciano FrágilRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: CASSIOPEIA part 1 demonstrated superior depth of response and prolonged progression-free survival with daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-VTd) versus bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) alone as an induction and consolidation regimen in transplant-eligible patients newly diagnosed with myeloma. In CASSIOPEIA part 2, daratumumab maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival and increased minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rates versus observation. Here, we report long-term study outcomes of CASSIOPEIA. METHODS: CASSIOPEIA was a two-part, open-label, phase 3 trial of patients done at 111 European academic and community-based centres. Eligible patients were aged 18-65 years with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed myeloma and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. In part 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to pre-transplant induction and post-transplant consolidation with D-VTd or VTd. Patients who completed consolidation and had a partial response or better were re-randomised (1:1) to intravenous daratumumab maintenance (16 mg/kg every 8 weeks) or observation for 2 years or less. An interactive web-based system was used for both randomisations, and randomisation was balanced using permuted blocks of four. Stratification factors for the first randomisation (induction and consolidation phase) were site affiliation, International Staging System disease stage, and cytogenetic risk status. Stratification factors for the second randomisation (maintenance phase) were induction treatment and depth of response in the induction and consolidation phase. The primary endpoint for the induction and consolidation phase was the proportion of patients who achieved a stringent complete response after consolidation; results for this endpoint remain unchanged from those reported previously. The primary endpoint for the maintenance phase was progression-free survival from second randomisation. Efficacy evaluations in the induction and consolidation phase were done on the intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who underwent first randomisation, and efficacy analyses in the maintenance phase were done in the maintenance-specific intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who were randomly assigned at the second randomisation. This analysis represents the final data cutoff at the end of the study. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02541383. FINDINGS: Between Sept 22, 2015 and Aug 1, 2017, 1085 patients were randomly assigned to D-VTd (n=543) or VTd (n=542); between May 30, 2016 and June 18, 2018, 886 were re-randomised to daratumumab maintenance (n=442) or observation (n=444). At the clinical cutoff date, Sept 1, 2023, median follow-up was 80·1 months (IQR 75·7-85·6) from first randomisation and 70·6 months (66·4-76·1) from second randomisation. Progression-free survival from second randomisation was significantly longer in the daratumumab maintenance group than the observation-alone group (median not reached [95% CI 79·9-not estimable (NE)] vs 45·8 months [41·8-49·6]; HR 0·49 [95% CI 0·40-0·59]; p<0·0001); benefit was observed with D-VTd with daratumumab maintenance versus D-VTd with observation (median not reached [74·6-NE] vs 72·1 months [52·8-NE]; 0·76 [0·58-1·00]; p=0·048) and VTd with daratumumab maintenance versus VTd with observation (median not reached [66·9-NE] vs 32·7 months [27·2-38·7]; 0·34 [0·26-0·44]; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: The long-term follow-up results of CASSIOPEIA show that including daratumumab in both the induction and consolidation phase and the maintenance phase led to superior progression-free survival outcomes. Our results confirm D-VTd induction and consolidation as a standard of care, and support the option of subsequent daratumumab monotherapy maintenance, for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. FUNDING: Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome, Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial Group for Hematology Oncology, and Janssen Research & Development.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Mieloma Múltiple , Talidomida , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/patología , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Anciano , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios de Seguimiento , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Adolescente , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Belantamab mafodotin had single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, a finding that supports further evaluation of the agent in combination with standard-care therapies. METHODS: In this phase 3, open-label, randomized trial, we evaluated belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVd), as compared with daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd), in patients who had progression of multiple myeloma after at least one line of therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points were overall survival, response duration, and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status. RESULTS: In total, 494 patients were randomly assigned to receive BVd (243 patients) or DVd (251 patients). At a median follow-up of 28.2 months (range, 0.1 to 40.0), median progression-free survival was 36.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4 to not reached) in the BVd group and 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.1 to 17.5) in the DVd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.53; P<0.001). Overall survival at 18 months was 84% in the BVd group and 73% in the DVd group. An analysis of the restricted mean response duration favored BVd over DVd (P<0.001). A complete response or better plus MRD-negative status occurred in 25% of the patients in the BVd group and 10% of those in the DVd group. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 95% of the patients in the BVd group and 78% of those in the DVd group. Ocular events were more common in the BVd group than in the DVd group (79% vs. 29%); such events were managed with dose modifications, and events of worsening visual acuity mostly resolved. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with DVd therapy, BVd therapy conferred a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival among patients who had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after at least one line of therapy. Most patients had grade 3 or higher adverse events. (Funded by GSK; DREAMM-7 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04246047; EudraCT number, 2018-003993-29.).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Mieloma Múltiple , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Neoplasia Residual , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Triplet or quadruplet therapies incorporating proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, and anti-CD38 antibodies have led to prolonged survival among patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; however, most patients have a relapse. Frontline lenalidomide therapy has increased the number of patients with lenalidomide-refractory disease at the time of the first relapse. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, we evaluated belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (BPd), as compared with pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd), in lenalidomide-exposed patients who had relapsed or refractory myeloma after at least one line of therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Disease response and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 302 patients underwent randomization; 155 were assigned to the BPd group, and 147 to the PVd group. At a median follow-up of 21.8 months (range, <0.1 to 39.2), the 12-month estimated progression-free survival with BPd was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63 to 78), as compared with 51% (95% CI, 42 to 60) with PVd (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.73; P<0.001). Data on overall survival were immature. The percentage of patients with a response to treatment (partial response or better) was 77% (95% CI, 70 to 84) in the BPd group and 72% (95% CI, 64 to 79) in the PVd group; 40% (95% CI, 32 to 48) and 16% (95% CI, 11 to 23), respectively, had a complete response or better. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 94% of the patients in the BPd group and 76% of those in the PVd group. Ocular events occurred in 89% of the patients who received BPd (grade 3 or 4 in 43%) and 30% of those who received PVd (grade 3 or 4 in 2%); ocular events in the BPd group were managed with belantamab mafodotin dose modification. Ocular events led to treatment discontinuation in 9% of the patients in the BPd group and in no patients in the PVd group. CONCLUSIONS: Among lenalidomide-exposed patients with relapsed or refractory myeloma, BPd conferred a significantly greater benefit than PVd with respect to progression-free survival, as well as deeper, more durable responses. Ocular events were common but were controllable by belantamab mafodotin dose modification. (Funded by GSK; DREAMM-8 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04484623; EudraCT number, 2018-004354-21.).