RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Equivalent efficacy and comparable pharmacokinetic, immunogenicity, and safety profiles of the biosimilar BAT1806/BIIB800 and reference tocilizumab (TCZ) in participants with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have been reported up to week 24 (treatment period [TP] 1) of the phase 3 study. Here we present results for TP2 (study weeks 24-48). METHODS: In this phase 3, multicenter, multiregional, double-blind, active-controlled, equivalence study, participants with active RA despite methotrexate were randomized (1:1:2) to intravenous administration of 8 mg/kg TCZ every 4 weeks to week 48 (TCZ group), or TCZ to week 24 followed by BAT1806/BIIB800 to week 48 (TCZ to BAT1806/BIIB800 group), or BAT1806/BIIB800 to week 48 (BAT1806/BIIB800 group). Efficacy in TP2 was evaluated using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria (ACR20/50/70) and change from baseline in Disease Activity Score on 28 joints (DAS28). Pharmacokinetics (trough levels), safety, and immunogenicity were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of 621 randomized participants, 577 (92.9%) completed TP1 and entered TP2 (TCZ: N = 145 [93.5%]; TCZ to BAT1806/BIIB800: N = 142 [92.2%]; BAT1806/BIIB800: N = 290 [92.9%]). Proportions of ACR20 responders were similar between treatment groups throughout TP2 (87.8%, 90.3%, and 90.4%, respectively, at week 48), as were proportions of ACR50 and ACR70 responders, and reduction in DAS28. Drug trough levels and antidrug antibody incidences were comparable between the treatment groups. Adverse events were balanced across the treatment groups and no fatal events were reported. CONCLUSION: In TP2, efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable between the TCZ, TCZ to BAT1806/BIIB800, and BAT1806/BIIB800 groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03830203 and EudraCT 2018-002202-31.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Metotrexato , Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/farmacocinética , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Método Doble Ciego , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/farmacocinética , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad

RESUMEN

Purpose: Secukinumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin (IL)-17A, is approved for the treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, and hidradenitis suppurativa. This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of CMAB015, a candidate secukinumab biosimilar, with the reference product secukinumab (Cosentyx®) in healthy Chinese male subjects. Patients and methods: This double-blind, parallel-group study randomized healthy Chinese male subjects (N=130) to receive either a single dose of 150 mg CMAB015 or secukinumab subcutaneously. Primary study endpoints were PK parameters such as the maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-inf), while safety and immunogenicity were secondary endpoints. Results: The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax and AUC0-inf for CMAB015 to secukinumab were all within the bioequivalence limits (80.00-125.00%). Other PK parameters were comparable between the groups. The safety profile of CMAB015 was similar to that of secukinumab, with no serious adverse events related to treatment. The incidence of TEAEs was slightly higher in the CMAB015 group, but these events were mild to moderate in severity and did not lead to any withdrawals from the study. Immunogenicity analysis revealed low rates of anti-drug antibody (ADA) positivity, with similar rates between CMAB015 and secukinumab. Conclusion: This study demonstrated equivalent PK, comparable safety, and immunogenicity of CMAB015 to secukinumab in healthy Chinese male subjects. These findings support further clinical evaluation of CMAB015 as a secukinumab biosimilar. Trial Registration: The trial was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier No. NCT05734482) and Chinadrugtrials.org.cn (Identifier No. CTR20230105).

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Método Doble Ciego , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Pueblo Asiatico , China , Persona de Mediana Edad , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Pueblos del Este de Asia

RESUMEN

This study presents a safety analysis of infusion reactions (IRs) in gastric cancer patients who switched from reference trastuzumab to its biosimilar, trastuzumab-NK, at the Saitama Cancer Center in Japan from April 2018 to March 2022. IRs were identified if patients developed symptoms such as fever, chills, infusion-related reactions, hypersensitivity, rash, pruritus, urticaria, systemic disorders, or immune system disorders on the day of administration or the following day. The incidence of IRs was 14% in the reference trastuzumab group, 33% in the trastuzumab-NK group, and 33% in the switching group. There was no significant difference in IR incidence between the reference trastuzumab and trastuzumab-NK groups (p = 0.235). Among the switching group, only one of the three patients who experienced an IR had a reaction associated with the switch. These findings suggest that the frequency of IRs in the switching group gastric cancer is comparable to the other groups, indicating that switching is a viable treatment option with appropriate management. Additionally, 37 of the 45 patients in the study were male, provides new safety information on switching in gastric cancer for male patients that has not been previously reported.

Asunto(s)

Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Receptor ErbB-2 , Neoplasias Gástricas , Trastuzumab , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastuzumab/efectos adversos , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Japón , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Infusiones Intravenosas

RESUMEN

This was a Phase I, randomized, double-blinded, three-arm, single-dose, parallel study aimed to demonstrate pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between MB09 (a denosumab biosimilar candidate) and reference denosumab (XGEVA® from European Union [EU-reference] and United States [US-reference]) in a healthy male population. The primary PK endpoints included: Area under the serum concentration versus time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration timepoint (AUC0-last); and maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax). Secondary endpoints included: AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), time to reach maximum observed concentration, clearance, terminal phase half-life, pharmacodynamic, safety, and immunogenicity assessments. A total of 255 subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to receive a subcutaneous 35 mg dose of MB09 or reference denosumab. Cmax was reached after denosumab administration, followed by a decline in the concentration with similar terminal phase half-live across treatment arms. Systemic exposure of MB09 (AUC0-last and Cmax) was equivalent to the reference denosumab, as the 90% confidence intervals around the geometric least square mean ratios laid within the predefined acceptance limits (80.00%, 125.00%) across all comparisons. Pharmacodynamic parameters, based on the percent of change from baseline in serum C-terminal telopeptide of Type 1 collagen levels, were similar across the three arms. The treatments were considered safe and generally well tolerated, with 92 treatment-emergent adverse events reported (most Grade 2 and 3) and similarly distributed. Immunogenicity was low and similarly distributed. These results provide strong evidence that supports the biosimilarity between MB09 and denosumab reference products.

Asunto(s)

Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Denosumab , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Denosumab/farmacocinética , Denosumab/administración & dosificación , Denosumab/efectos adversos , Masculino , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Área Bajo la Curva , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/farmacocinética , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Adolescente , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Semivida

RESUMEN

Background and aims: Allergic asthma has a considerable burden on the quality of life. A significant portion of moderate-to-severe allergic asthma patients need omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin-E monoclonal antibody, as an add-on therapy. In this phase III clinical trial P043 (Zerafil®, CinnaGen, Iran) efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were compared with Xolair® (the originator omalizumab). The primary outcome was the rate of protocol-defined asthma exacerbations. Methods: Exacerbation rates, Asthma Control Test (ACT) results, spirometry measurements, immunogenicity, and safety were evaluated. Each subject received either medication with a dose ranging from 150 to 375 mg based on pre-treatment serum total IgE level (IU/mL) and body weight (kg) every two or four weeks for a duration of 28 weeks. Results: Exacerbation rates were 0.150 (CI: 0.079-0.220) in the P043 group, and 0.190 (CI: 0.110-0.270) in the omalizumab group (per-protocol). The least squares mean differences of predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in the First second (FEV1) were -2.51% (CI: -7.17-2.15, P=0.29) and -3.87% (CI: -8.79-1.04, P=0.12), pre- and post-bronchodilator use. The mean ± SD of ACT scores at the screening and the last visit were 10.62 ± 2.93 and 20.93 ± 4.26 in P043 and 11.09 ± 2.75 and 20.46 ± 5.11 in the omalizumab group. A total of 288 adverse events were reported for the 256 enrolled participants. Among all, "dyspnea" and "headache" were the most reported ones. The overall incidence of adverse events (P=0.62) and serious adverse events (P=0.07) had no significant differences between the two groups. None of the samples were positive for anti-drug antibodies. Conclusion: P043 was equivalent to omalizumab in the management of asthma in reduction of exacerbations. There was no significant difference in other efficacy and safety parameters. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05813470) and www.IRCT.ir (IRCT20150303021315N20).

Asunto(s)

Antiasmáticos , Asma , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Omalizumab , Humanos , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Omalizumab/efectos adversos , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Adulto Joven , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of ZRC-3277 (pertuzumab biosimilar) with Perjeta® (pertuzumab) in previously untreated patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase III, multicenter, double-blind study across 38 sites in India randomized (1:1) patients with HER2-positive MBC in either the ZRC-3277 or Perjeta® group. Both groups also received trastuzumab and docetaxel. Of 268 enrolled patients, mITT population had 243 patients (119 and 124 in the ZRC-3277 and Perjeta® groups, respectively). The primary objective was to compare the between-group objective response rate (ORR) after 6 cycles of treatment. ORR was determined by evaluating scans of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging following Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST 1.1). Two-sided 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the difference in ORR was determined to evaluate the noninferiority of ZRC-3277 to Perjeta®. The secondary outcomes included the assessment of PK, immunogenicity, and safety between the 2 groups. RESULTS: In the mITT population, 104 (87.39%) and 114 (91.94%) participants achieved the ORR in the ZRC-3277 and Perjeta® groups, respectively. For predefined -15% noninferiority margin, obtained 2-sided 95% CIs (-12.19%, 3.11%) for the difference in ORR (-4.55%) between the 2 groups demonstrated the noninferiority of ZRC-3277 to Perjeta®. PK, immunogenicity, and safety were not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Efficacy, PK, immunogenicity, and safety profiles of ZRC-3277 was found to be similar to those of Perjeta®.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Neoplasias de la Mama , Receptor ErbB-2 , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Doble Ciego , India , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/farmacocinética , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación

RESUMEN

AVT04 (Uzpruvo®) is a biosimilar of the reference anti-interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 monoclonal antibody ustekinumab. It is approved in the EU for plaque psoriasis, paediatric plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and Crohn's disease as per the reference product. AVT04 has similar physicochemical characteristics to those of reference ustekinumab, and the pharmacokinetic similarity of the agents has been shown in healthy volunteers and patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. AVT04 demonstrated clinical efficacy similar to that of reference ustekinumab in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis, and was generally well tolerated in this population. The tolerability, safety and immunogenicity profiles of AVT04 were similar to those of reference ustekinumab, and switching from reference ustekinumab to AVT04 had no impact on efficacy, safety or immunogenicity. The role of reference ustekinumab in the management of inflammatory diseases is well established and AVT04 provides an effective biosimilar alternative for patients requiring ustekinumab therapy.

Asunto(s)

Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Psoriasis , Ustekinumab , Humanos , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Ustekinumab/farmacocinética , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacología , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/farmacocinética , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/farmacología , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico

RESUMEN

The treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has dramatically changed in the past 30 years. Currently, numerous conventional, biologic, and targeted synthetic DMARDs have been licensed and used following recommendations provided by international and national scientific societies. However, the availability of biosimilars and the increasing necessity of savings impacted on the local/national prescription of these drugs. The information provided by data sheet of every single drug is a decisive factor on the choice of a certain treatment merged with the patient's profile. Thus, our purpose was to construct a rational algorithm for the treatment strategy in RA according to costs and the product leaflet of the biologic and targeted-synthetic DMARDs currently licensed in Italy. We used the most recent available recommendations and then we performed a review of the literature considering all the factors that are known to influence drug safety/effectiveness. All these factors were considered in the context of the data sheets of currently available originators and biosimilars.

Asunto(s)

Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Humanos , Algoritmos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/economía , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Etiquetado de Medicamentos , Italia

Asunto(s)

Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Ustekinumab , Humanos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/farmacología , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Aprobación de Drogas , United States Food and Drug Administration

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor alpha, and GP1111 (Zessly®, Sandoz) is the most recently approved infliximab biosimilar in Europe. We reviewed the approval process and key evidence for GP1111, focusing primarily on the indications of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AREAS COVERED: This narrative review discusses preclinical, clinical, and real-world data for GP1111. EXPERT OPINION: Results from the Phase III REFLECTIONS trial in patients with moderate-to-severe active RA despite methotrexate therapy confirmed the similarity in efficacy and safety between GP1111 and reference infliximab. Switching from reference infliximab to GP1111 in REFLECTIONS had no impact on efficacy or safety. Since the European approval of GP1111 in March 2018, real-world data have also confirmed the efficacy and safety of switching from another infliximab biosimilar to GP1111 in patients with RA and IBD. In addition, budget impact analysis of various sequential targeted treatments in patients with RA found that GP1111 was cost-effective when used early after failure of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Therefore, 5 years' post-approval experience with GP1111 in RA and IBD, and key clinical and real-world evidence, support the safety and efficacy of continued use of GP1111 in all infliximab-approved indications.

Asunto(s)

Artritis Reumatoide , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Infliximab , Humanos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Aprobación de Drogas , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Infliximab (IFX) biosimilars are available to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), offering cost reductions versus originator IFX in some jurisdictions. However, concerns remain regarding the efficacy and safety of originator-to-biosimilar switching. This systematic literature review evaluated safety and effectiveness of switching between IFX products in patients with IBD, including multiple switchers. METHODS: Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to capture studies (2012-2022) including patients with IBD who switched between approved IFX products. Effectiveness outcomes: disease activity; disease severity; response to treatment; patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Safety outcomes: incidence and rate of adverse events (AEs); discontinuations due to AEs, failure rate; hospitalizations; surgeries. Immunogenicity outcomes (n, %): anti-drug antibodies; patients receiving concomitant immunomodulatory medication. RESULTS: Data from 85 publications (81 observational, two randomized controlled trials) were included. Clinical effectiveness outcomes were consistent with the known profile of originator IFX with no difference after switching. There were no unexpected/serious AEs after switching, and rates of AEs were generally consistent with the known profile of IFX. CONCLUSIONS: Most studies reported that clinical, PROs, and safety outcomes for originator-to-biosimilar switching were clinically equivalent to originator responses. Limited data are available regarding multiple switches. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42021289144.

Asunto(s)

Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Fármacos Gastrointestinales , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Infliximab , Humanos , Infliximab/efectos adversos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/economía , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/inmunología , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/efectos adversos , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this phase III clinical randomized trial was to establish the therapeutic equivalence of biosimilar etanercept (bio-etanercept) with original etanercept (O-etanercept) for patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: The study (NCT04079374) enrolled patients with moderate to high disease activity rheumatoid arthritis. Enrolled patients were randomized 1:1 into 2 treatment groups, 1 receiving bio-etanercept (study drug) and the other receiving O-etanercept (comparator) at a dose of 25mg twice weekly, for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of patients with an ACR20 response after 24 weeks of treatment. Safety (adverse reaction/adverse event) and immunogenicity of both drugs were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 156 patients (79 in the bio-etanercept group and 77 in the O-etanercept group) who completed 24-week treatment and 4-week follow-up, 82.3% (65 patients) and 90.9% (70 patients) achieved an ACR20 response in the bio-etanercept and O-etanercept groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .16). No significant differences in the occurrence of adverse reactions/adverse events were found between the 2 groups regardless of severity (P = .63 for mild, P = .43 for moderate and P > .99 for severe). The development of antibodies in the bio-etanercept group was observed in 4 (5.1%; visit 6), 4 (5.0%; visit 9), and 3 (3.8%; visit 11) patients, and in 5 (6.4%), 5 (6.5%), and 3 (4.1%) patients in the O-etanercept group. The differences between the 2 groups were not significant (P > .99). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that bio-etanercept was equivalent to the reference formulation.

Asunto(s)

Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Etanercept , Humanos , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Equivalencia Terapéutica

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is one of the first line treatments for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Rituximab comprises most of the treatment cost for this regimen; therefore, biosimilars, such as rituximab-abbs are crucial to provide affordable care. Although rituximab-abbs was studied primarily in follicular lymphoma, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved this drug for all indications of the reference product on the basis of extrapolation. Effectiveness and safety data surrounding the use of rituximab-abbs in DLBCL is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rituximab-abbs and reference product rituximab as R-CHOP treatment for patients with DLBCL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This noninferiority (NI) study compared the 2-year overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and incidence of adverse events (AEs) between rituximab-abbs and its reference product (RP) in R-CHOP among adult patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL. The study inclusion period was from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020. Analyses were performed on the basis of a noninferiority lower limit of 10% for OS and ORR, and an upper limit of 10% for serious AEs. RESULTS: There were 240 patients who received RP rituximab, while 295 patients received rituximab-abbs. The cohort had a mean age of 63.7±12.2 years and 43% were female. The 2-year OS was 81.0% and 79.6% (NI p < 0.01) while the ORR was 80.0% and 69.6% (NI p < 0.01), among the rituximab-abbs and rituximab groups, respectively. The incidence of infusion reaction AEs (NI p < 0.01) and noninfusion reaction AEs (NI p < 0.01) also met noninferiority. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that rituximab-abbs was noninferior to rituximab in both effectiveness and safety among patients receiving R-CHOP for DLBCL in this study. Long-term follow-up would be needed to confirm these results.

Asunto(s)

Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Ciclofosfamida , Doxorrubicina , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso , Prednisona , Rituximab , Vincristina , Humanos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/uso terapéutico , Doxorrubicina/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/uso terapéutico , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Prednisona/uso terapéutico , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Vincristina/uso terapéutico , Vincristina/efectos adversos , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años

RESUMEN

To compare the efficacy and safety of the proposed aflibercept biosimilar SCD411 and reference aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, this randomized, double-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted in 14 countries from 13 August 2020 to 8 September 2022. Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. With subfoveal, juxtafoveal, or extrafoveal choroidal neovascularization were aged 50 years or older. Intravitreal injection of SCD411 or aflibercept (2.0 mg) were administered every 4 weeks for the first three injections and every 8 weeks until week 48. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to week 8 with an adjusted equivalence margin of ± 3.0 letters. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either SCD411 (n = 288) or reference aflibercept (n = 288). A total of 566 participants (98.3%) completed week 8 of the study. The least-squares mean difference of change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to week 8 (SCD411-aflibercept) was - 0.4 letters (90% confidence interval = - 1.6 to 0.9). The incidence of ocular (69 of 287 [24.0%] vs. 71 of 286 [24.8%]) and serious ocular (5 of 287 [1.7%] vs. 3 of 286 [1.0%]) treatment-emergent adverse effects were similar between the SCD411 and aflibercept groups. Immunogenicity analysis revealed a low incidence of neutralizing antibody formation in both groups. In conclusion, SCD411 has equivalent efficacy compared with reference aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and has a comparable safety profile. The results support the potential use of SCD411 for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Asunto(s)

Inyecciones Intravítreas , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión , Agudeza Visual , Humanos , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/efectos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Agudeza Visual/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método Doble Ciego , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neovascularización Coroidal/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis/administración & dosificación

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Trastuzumab targets human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptors and is indicated for treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. BP02, a recombinant IgG1 kappa humanized monoclonal antibody, is being developed as a trastuzumab biosimilar. The objective of this study was to evaluate the equivalence of BP02 with reference trastuzumab (RT: Herceptin®-EU) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: This double-blinded, 1:1 randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled, phase III equivalence trial recruited women aged 18-75 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed HER2- positive, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer with systemic metastasis, from 59 sites in India. Patients were randomly allocated 1:1 stratified by estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor status to receive BP02/RT (8-mg/kg loading dose on day 1-cycle 1, 6 mg/kg on day 1-cycles 2-8, of each 3-week cycle) combined with docetaxel (75 mg/m2 on day 1-cycles 1-8) [induction phase]. Participants with complete or partial response, or stable disease at the end of the induction phase continued the study drug until disease progression/treatment discontinuation [maintenance phase]. The primary efficacy endpoint was the objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. RESULTS: Between 23 September, 2020 and 16 September, 2022, 690 patients were recruited (n = 345 each to BP02/RT). At the end of the induction phase (intent-to-treat population), a similar proportion of patients achieved an objective response rate with BP02 (n = 231 [67.0%], 95% confidence interval [CI] 62.0, 71.9) and RT (n = 238 [69.0%], 95% CI 64.1, 73.9). The 95% CI of risk difference (-2.03, 95% CI -9.15, 5.09) and 90% CI of risk ratio (0.97, 90% CI 0.89, 1.06) were within equivalence margins of ± 13% and (0.80, 1.25), respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal were reported in 2.9% and 3.2% patients with BP02 and RT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BP02 showed an equivalent efficacy and similar safety profile to RT at the end of 24 weeks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI Number: CTRI/2020/04/024456.

Asunto(s)

Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Neoplasias de la Mama , Receptor ErbB-2 , Trastuzumab , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacología , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Adulto , Método Doble Ciego , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificación , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico , Trastuzumab/efectos adversos , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , India , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of Gan & Lee insulin glargine (GL Glargine) with that of the originator insulin glargine (Lantus) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: This was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label, equivalence study. Five hundred seventy-six subjects with T1DM were randomized 1:1 to receive either GL Glargine or Lantus treatment for 26 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of subjects in each treatment group who developed treatment-induced anti-insulin antibody after baseline and up to visit week 26, which was evaluated using a country-adjusted logistic regression model. The study also compared the changes in glycated hemoglobin, and adverse events including hypoglycemia. RESULTS: The percentage of subjects positive for treatment-induced anti-insulin antibody by Week 26 was 25.8% in the GL Glargine treatment group and 25.3% in the Lantus treatment group, with a 90% confidence interval (-5.4, 6.5) of the difference in proportions that fell completely between the similarity margins (-11.3, 11.3). The least squares mean difference between treatment groups for changes in glycated hemoglobin was -0.08 (90% confidence interval: -0.23, 0.06), and the other immunogenicity and safety profiles were comparable. CONCLUSION: GL Glargine demonstrated similar immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety compared to Lantus over 26 weeks in patients with T1DM.

Asunto(s)

Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Hipoglucemiantes , Insulina Glargina , Humanos , Insulina Glargina/uso terapéutico , Insulina Glargina/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/inmunología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Anticuerpos Insulínicos/sangre , Anticuerpos Insulínicos/inmunología , Adulto Joven , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adolescente , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemia/inmunología

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, and safety of candidate tocilizumab biosimilar, CT-P47, administered via auto-injector (CT-P47 AI) or pre-filled syringe (CT-P47 PFS), in healthy Asian adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this phase I, multicenter, open-label study, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive a single 162 mg/0.9 mL dose of CT-P47 via AI or PFS. Primary endpoints were area under the concentration - time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf) and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). PK equivalence was determined if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratios of geometric least-squares means (gLSMs) were within the predefined 80-125% equivalence margin. Secondary PK parameters, immunogenicity, and safety outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 314 participants randomized (155 CT-P47 AI; 159 CT-P47 PFS), 310 received the study drug (153 CT-P47 AI; 157 CT-P47 PFS). Primary and secondary PK results, immunogenicity and safety were similar between groups. Ninety percent CIs for the ratio of gLSMs were within the predefined equivalence margin for AUC0-inf (85.87-102.94) and Cmax (82.98-98.16). CONCLUSIONS: PK equivalence between CT-P47 AI and CT-P47 PFS was demonstrated in healthy Asian adults, with comparable immunogenicity and safety between the two devices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05617183.

---

Tocilizumab is a biologic medicine used to treat inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis. A biosimilar is a drug that is an almost identical copy of an approved original ('reference') biologic medicine; it has identical efficacy and safety to the original medicine but is typically less expensive. CT­P47 is in development as a possible tocilizumab biosimilar.Some patients prefer injections using an auto-injector (AI) rather than a pre-filled syringe (PFS), for reasons including ease of use and convenience. With an AI, medicine is delivered automatically by firmly pressing the device against the skin, whereas, with a PFS, a needle is inserted into the skin and medicine delivered by depressing the plunger. The injection of CT­P47 using a PFS has shown comparable pharmacokinetics (i.e., the uptake, metabolism and excretion of the drug by the body) and safety to tocilizumab. Therefore, if the pharmacokinetics and safety of CT­P47 administered via AI and PFS were shown to be similar, this might expand the choice of administration devices available to patients.In this study, 310 healthy adults received a single injection of CT­P47 via AI or PFS. Blood samples were taken over 43 days to analyze pharmacokinetics. The uptake, metabolism and elimination of CT­P47 by the body was similar when administered by each device, suggesting that CT­P47 can be administered by either AI or PFS.

Asunto(s)

Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Jeringas , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/farmacocinética , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Área Bajo la Curva , Autoadministración/instrumentación , Equivalencia Terapéutica

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In our study, we analyzed the efficacy and safety data of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) after switching to biosimilar rituximab (RTX). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients who switched to RTX were included in the study. Efficacy data were analyzed using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score, and safety data were analyzed using the frequency of side effects. RESULTS: The mean treatment duration of originator RTX was 35.6 ± 23.0 months, and the median treatment duration of biosimilar RTX was 17 months. The SLEDAI-2K score, approximately three months after the first dose of biosimilar RTX, was significantly lower (p = 0.027). A statistically significant difference was found between the SLEDAI-2K score assessed at the follow-up visit three months after the last dose of originator RTX and the SLEDAI-2K score obtained approximately three months after the first dose of biosimilar RTX (p = 0.011) and the calculated median SLEDAI-2K score was significantly lower than the SLEDAI-2K score assessed after administration of originator RTX. The side effect frequency that developed during the treatment of originator RTX was 15.3 per 100 patient-years. The most common side effect was infection, which was 15.3 per 100 patient-years. The most frequent infection was urinary tract infection. The side effect frequency during treatment of biosimilar RTX was 39 per 100 patient-years, and the most frequent infection was pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, SLEDAI-2K scores demonstrated that no efficacy loss was experienced after switching to CT-P10 molecule, which is a biosimilar RTX. It was observed that switching to biosimilar RTX did not decrease treatment efficacy in the patient group diagnosed with SLE and biosimilar RTX was found to be safe.

Asunto(s)

Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Rituximab , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/diagnóstico , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For cost-saving purposes, children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are being switched (for non-medical reasons) from biological originators to biosimilars. Here, we aimed to investigate those who switched from an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) originator to a biosimilar, regarding drug survival and disease activity, compared with a matched cohort who continued the originator. METHODS: This analysis included all patients in the UK JIA Biologics Register switching directly from an anti-TNF originator to a biosimilar of the same product. All patients were matched (age, sex, disease duration, calendar year of when patients started originator therapy, line of therapy, and International League of Associations for Rheumatology [ILAR] category) to patients continuing the originator. For those matched successfully, a Cox proportional hazard model assessed whether drug persistence differed between those who switched compared with those who continued the originator. Overall change in the 71-joint juvenile arthritis disease activity score and the proportion of patients with a clinically important worsening score (by ≥1·7 units) after 6 months was compared between cohorts. This analysis was designed to address a priority research area set by our patient partners. FINDINGS: There were 224 children and young people with non-systemic JIA (139 [62%] were female, and 85 [38%] were male) identified as switching from a biological originator to a biosimilar of the same product from Jan 1, 2017, to July 7, 2023. 143 (64%) patients were originally on adalimumab, 56 (25%) on etanercept, and 25 (11%) on infliximab. Of these, 164 patients were matched successfully to those continuing the originator. There was no evidence that patients switching were more likely to stop treatment compared with those continuing the originator, with a hazard ratio of 1·46 (95% CI 0·93-2·30). Of the 51 patients in the biosimilar group who stopped treatment, 18 (35%) switched back to the originator (14 in the first year), 28 (55%) started a different biological drug, and five (10%) discontinued all treatment by the last follow-up. Of the 87 matched patients with available disease activity, there was no evidence that JADAS-71 worsened more after 6 months, with an odds ratio of 0·71 (95% CI 0·34-1·51; p=0·38). INTERPRETATION: In this matched comparative effectiveness analysis, children and young people with JIA switched from originators to biosimilars. Disease activity was similar between patients switching compared with those continuing the originator. Three quarters of patients were still receiving their biosimilar after 1 year, with switching back to originator uncommon, at only 9% after 1 year, suggesting good tolerability of non-medical switching in this patient population. This information is reassuring to clinicians and patients regarding the effect of non-medical biological switching. FUNDING: British Society for Rheumatology, Versus Arthritis, and National Institutes for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.

Asunto(s)

Antirreumáticos , Artritis Juvenil , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Humanos , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/economía , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Niño , Adolescente , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Reino Unido , Estudios de Cohortes , Resultado del Tratamiento , Preescolar , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico

RESUMEN

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD20 antigen in B cells. For pemphigus, rituximab has been highly effective in steroid-sparing therapy for moderate to severe cases. Originator rituximab has demonstrated favorable treatment effects in patients with pemphigus, but its high cost remains a challenge. Biosimilar rituximab is expected to offer a potential solution. However, it is required for the comparative study of efficacy and safety between biosimilar and originator because all biosimilars may not be identical to the originator. In this study, we compared the treatment effects and safety of biosimilar (Truxima) and originator (MabThera) rituximab in patients with pemphigus. A final cohort of 52 patients in the MabThera group and 72 patients in the Truxima group was enrolled. Except for the intravenous immunoglobulin administration rate, there were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, and for the purpose of comparing efficacy, investigations into time to complete remission, total steroid intake to complete remission, and total steroid intake for 6 months following rituximab treatment revealed no significant differences between the two groups. Truxima can be considered a relatively affordable alternative treatment option for pemphigus, offering cost-effectiveness to patients who are indicated for the treatment with MabThera.

Asunto(s)

Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Pénfigo , Rituximab , Humanos , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/administración & dosificación , Pénfigo/tratamiento farmacológico , Pénfigo/inmunología , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/economía , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Inducción de Remisión/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos