RESUMEN
La auscultación pulmonar es parte fundamental del examen físico para el diagnóstico de las enfermedades respiratorias. La estandarización que ha alcanzado la nomenclatura de los ruidos respiratorios, sumado a los avances en el análisis computacional de los mismos, han permitido mejorar la utilidad de esta técnica. Sin embargo, el rendimiento de la auscultación pulmonar ha sido cuestionado por tener una concordancia variable entre profesionales de la salud. Aun cuando la incorporación de nuevas herramientas diagnósticas de imágenes y función pulmonar han revolucionado la precisión diagnóstica en enfermedades respiratorias, no existe tecnología que permita reemplazar la técnica de auscultación pulmonar para guiar el proceso diagnóstico. Por una parte, la auscultación pulmonar permite seleccionar a aquellos pacientes que se beneficiarán de una determinada técnica diagnóstica, se puede repetir cuantas veces sea necesario para tomar decisiones clínicas, y frecuentemente permite prescindir de exámenes adicionales que no siempre son fáciles de realizar o no se encuentran disponibles. En esta revisión se presenta el estado actual de la técnica de auscultación pulmonar y su rendimiento objetivo basado en la nomenclatura actual aceptada para los ruidos respiratorios, además de resumir la evidencia principal de estudios de concordancia de auscultación pediátrica y su análisis objetivo a través de nueva tecnología computacional.
Lung auscultation is an essential part of the physical examination for diagnosing respiratory diseases. The terminology standardization for lung sounds, in addition to advances in their analysis through new technologies, have improved the use of this technique. However, traditional auscultation has been questioned due to the limited concordance among health professionals. Despite the revolu tionary use of new diagnostic tools of imaging and lung function tests allowing diagnostic accuracy in respiratory diseases, no technology can replace lung auscultation to guide the diagnostic process. Lung auscultation allows identifying those patients who may benefit from a specific test. Moreover, this technique can be performed many times to make clinical decisions, and often with no need for- complicated and sometimes unavailable tests. This review describes the current state-of-the-art of lung auscultation and its efficacy based on the current respiratory sound terminology. In addition, it describes the main evidence on respiratory sound concordance studies among health professionals and its objective analysis through new technology.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Auscultación/métodos , Ruidos Respiratorios/diagnóstico , Pediatría , Auscultación/normas , Auscultación/tendencias , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Ruidos Respiratorios/clasificación , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Terminología como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The effect of abdominal palpation on bowel sounds is controversial. The authors developed an auscultation apparatus to count bowel sounds and determined whether abdominal palpation modifies the number of bowel sounds in healthy volunteers and gastrointestinal outpatients. METHODS: Four medical students developed an auscultation apparatus by attaching a Littmann stethoscope to an electret condenser microphone. The students examined 20 healthy volunteers and 20 gastrointestinal outpatients between March and June 2018. Abdominal auscultation lasting 4 minutes (1-minute each quadrant) was performed before and after abdominal palpation with registration of sound tracings. The software Audacity was used to count the bowel sounds. The effect of palpation on bowel sounds was analyzed using Generalized Estimating Equations. RESULTS: The volunteers were predominantly young (mean ± SD, 21 ± 2 years) and men (70%), whereas the outpatients were older (60 ± 11 years) and women (80%). The apparatus was able to generate sound tracings with good quality from all participants. In the comparison before/after palpation, the number of bowel sounds did not differ either in volunteers (mean ± SD, 12.6 ± 4.7 and 11.6 ± 3.5; P = 0.482) or in patients (15.6 ± 7.5 and 15.8 ± 7.9; P = 0.714). In the analysis of all participants, the difference before-after palpation was not statistically significant (mean ± SD, 14.1 ± 6.3 and 13.7 ± 6.4, respectively; P = 0.550; mean difference = 0.4; 95% CI -1.2 to 2.0) and did not depend on the group studied. CONCLUSIONS: Using an apparatus devised by medical students, the authors found that abdominal palpation did not modify the number of bowel sounds in healthy volunteers and gastrointestinal outpatients.
Asunto(s)
Auscultación/métodos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico , Motilidad Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Tracto Gastrointestinal/fisiopatología , Palpación/métodos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/fisiopatología , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Sonido , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Lung auscultation is an essential part of the physical examination for diagnosing respiratory diseases. The terminology standardization for lung sounds, in addition to advances in their analysis through new technologies, have improved the use of this technique. However, traditional auscultation has been questioned due to the limited concordance among health professionals. Despite the revolu tionary use of new diagnostic tools of imaging and lung function tests allowing diagnostic accuracy in respiratory diseases, no technology can replace lung auscultation to guide the diagnostic process. Lung auscultation allows identifying those patients who may benefit from a specific test. Moreover, this technique can be performed many times to make clinical decisions, and often with no need for- complicated and sometimes unavailable tests. This review describes the current state-of-the-art of lung auscultation and its efficacy based on the current respiratory sound terminology. In addition, it describes the main evidence on respiratory sound concordance studies among health professionals and its objective analysis through new technology.
Asunto(s)
Auscultación/métodos , Ruidos Respiratorios/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Auscultación/normas , Auscultación/tendencias , Niño , Preescolar , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Pediatría , Ruidos Respiratorios/clasificación , Terminología como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: to compare blood pressure values obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods in different gestational periods, considering cuff width. METHOD: it is a cross-sectional and quasi-experimental study approved by the Research Ethics Committee. The sample consisted of 108 low-risk pregnant women. Blood pressure measurements were performed in gestational periods of 10-14, 19-22 and 27-30 weeks. RESULTS: The oscillometric device presented values similar to the auscultatory method in systolic blood pressure, but overestimated diastolic blood pressure. Underestimation of blood pressure occurred when using the standard width cuff rather than the correct width cuff in both measuring methods. CONCLUSION: Verification of brachial circumference and use of adequate cuffs in both methods are indispensable to obtain reliable blood pressure values in pregnant women. We recommend performance of additional studies to evaluate diastolic blood pressure overestimation by the Microlife 3BTO-A.
Asunto(s)
Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/instrumentación , Oscilometría/instrumentación , Mujeres Embarazadas , Adulto , Auscultación/instrumentación , Auscultación/métodos , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/métodos , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/normas , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oscilometría/métodos , Oscilometría/normas , EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of chest auscultation in detecting abnormal respiratory mechanics. METHODS: We evaluated 200 mechanically ventilated patients in the immediate postoperative period after cardiac surgery. We assessed respiratory system mechanics - static compliance of the respiratory system (Cst,rs) and respiratory system resistance (R,rs) - after which two independent examiners, blinded to the respiratory system mechanics data, performed chest auscultation. RESULTS: Neither decreased/abolished breath sounds nor crackles were associated with decreased Cst,rs (≤ 60 mL/cmH2O), regardless of the examiner. The overall accuracy of chest auscultation was 34.0% and 42.0% for examiners A and B, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of chest auscultation for detecting decreased/abolished breath sounds or crackles were 25.1% and 68.3%, respectively, for examiner A, versus 36.4% and 63.4%, respectively, for examiner B. Based on the judgments made by examiner A, there was a weak association between increased R,rs (≥ 15 cmH2O/L/s) and rhonchi or wheezing (Ï = 0.31, p < 0.01). The overall accuracy for detecting rhonchi or wheezing was 89.5% and 85.0% for examiners A and B, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting rhonchi or wheezing were 30.0% and 96.1%, respectively, for examiner A, versus 10.0% and 93.3%, respectively, for examiner B. CONCLUSIONS: Chest auscultation does not appear to be an accurate diagnostic method for detecting abnormal respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients in the immediate postoperative period after cardiac surgery.
Asunto(s)
Auscultación/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Trastornos Respiratorios/diagnóstico , Trastornos Respiratorios/etiología , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Mecánica Respiratoria/fisiología , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Trastornos Respiratorios/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether there were any associations between high-resolution cervical auscultation (HRCA) acoustic signals recorded by a contact microphone and swallowing kinematic events during pharyngeal swallow as assessed by a videofluoroscopic (VF) examination. DESIGN: Prospective pilot study. SETTING: University teaching hospital, university research laboratories. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=35) with stroke who have suspected dysphagia (26 men + 9 women; age = 65.8±11.2). METHODS: VF recordings of 100 liquid swallows from 35 stroke patients were analyzed, and a variety of HRCA signal features to characterize each swallow were calculated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percent of signal feature maxima (peak) occurring within 0.1 seconds of swallow kinematic event identified from VF recording. RESULTS: Maxima of HRCA signal features, such as standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, centroid frequency, bandwidth, and wave entropy, were associated with hyoid elevation, laryngeal vestibule closure, and upper esophageal sphincter opening, and the contact of the base of the tongue and posterior pharyngeal wall. CONCLUSIONS: Although the kinematic source of HRCA acoustic signals has yet to be fully elucidated, these results indicate a strong relationship between these HRCA signals and several swallow kinematic events. There is a potential for HRCA to be developed for diagnostic and rehabilitative clinical management of dysphagia.
Asunto(s)
Auscultación/métodos , Cinerradiografía/métodos , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Espectrografía del Sonido/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Acústica , Anciano , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Deglución/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Faringe/fisiopatología , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicacionesRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: to compare blood pressure values obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods in different gestational periods, considering cuff width. Method: it is a cross-sectional and quasi-experimental study approved by the Research Ethics Committee. The sample consisted of 108 low-risk pregnant women. Blood pressure measurements were performed in gestational periods of 10-14, 19-22 and 27-30 weeks. Results: The oscillometric device presented values similar to the auscultatory method in systolic blood pressure, but overestimated diastolic blood pressure. Underestimation of blood pressure occurred when using the standard width cuff rather than the correct width cuff in both measuring methods. Conclusion: Verification of brachial circumference and use of adequate cuffs in both methods are indispensable to obtain reliable blood pressure values in pregnant women. We recommend performance of additional studies to evaluate diastolic blood pressure overestimation by the Microlife 3BTO-A.
RESUMEN Objetivo: Comparar los valores de presión arterial obtenidos por los métodos auscultatorio e oscilométrico en distintos períodos del embarazo, en función del ancho del manguito. Método: Se trata de un estudio transversal y cuasiexperimental aprobado por el Comité de Ética en Investigación. Se analizó una muestra compuesta por 108 embarazadas de bajo riesgo. Las medidas de presión arterial se obtuvieron en los períodos gestacionales de 10-14, 19-22 y 27-30 semanas. Resultados: El aparato oscilométrico presentó valores similares al método auscultatorio en la presión arterial sistólica, sin embargo sobreestimó la presión arterial diastólica. Hubo subestimación de la presión arterial al utilizar el manguito de anchura estándar en lugar del manguito de anchura adecuada, en los dos métodos de medida. Conclusión: La verificación de la circunferencia braquial y el uso de manguitos adecuados en los dos métodos son indispensables para obtener valores confiables de la presión arterial en embarazadas. Recomendamos que se realicen nuevos estudios para evaluar la sobreestimación de la presión arterial diastólica por el aparato Microlife 3BTO-A.
RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar os valores de pressão arterial, obtidos pelos métodos auscultatório e oscilométrico em diferentes períodos gestacionais, em função da largura do manguito. Método: Trata-se de um estudo transversal e quase-experimental aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa. A amostra foi composta por 108 gestantes de baixo risco. As medidas de pressão arterial foram realizadas nos períodos gestacionais de 10-14, 19-22 e 27-30 semanas. Resultados: O aparelho oscilométrico apresentou valores similares ao método auscultatório na pressão arterial sistólica, porém superestimou a pressão arterial diastólica. Houve subestimação da pressão arterial ao utilizar o manguito de largura padrão ao invés do manguito de largura correta, nos dois métodos. Conclusão: A verificação da circunferência braquial e o uso de manguitos adequados nos dois métodos são indispensáveis para obter valores confiáveis da pressão arterial em gestantes. Recomendamos que novos estudos sejam realizados para avaliar a superestimação da pressão arterial diastólica pelo aparelho Microlife 3BTO-A.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Adulto , Oscilometría/instrumentación , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/instrumentación , Mujeres Embarazadas , Oscilometría/métodos , Oscilometría/normas , Auscultación/instrumentación , Auscultación/métodos , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/métodos , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/normas , Estudios Transversales , Edad Gestacional , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the accuracy of chest auscultation in detecting abnormal respiratory mechanics. Methods: We evaluated 200 mechanically ventilated patients in the immediate postoperative period after cardiac surgery. We assessed respiratory system mechanics - static compliance of the respiratory system (Cst,rs) and respiratory system resistance (R,rs) - after which two independent examiners, blinded to the respiratory system mechanics data, performed chest auscultation. Results: Neither decreased/abolished breath sounds nor crackles were associated with decreased Cst,rs (≤ 60 mL/cmH2O), regardless of the examiner. The overall accuracy of chest auscultation was 34.0% and 42.0% for examiners A and B, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of chest auscultation for detecting decreased/abolished breath sounds or crackles were 25.1% and 68.3%, respectively, for examiner A, versus 36.4% and 63.4%, respectively, for examiner B. Based on the judgments made by examiner A, there was a weak association between increased R,rs (≥ 15 cmH2O/L/s) and rhonchi or wheezing (ϕ = 0.31, p < 0.01). The overall accuracy for detecting rhonchi or wheezing was 89.5% and 85.0% for examiners A and B, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting rhonchi or wheezing were 30.0% and 96.1%, respectively, for examiner A, versus 10.0% and 93.3%, respectively, for examiner B. Conclusions: Chest auscultation does not appear to be an accurate diagnostic method for detecting abnormal respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients in the immediate postoperative period after cardiac surgery.
RESUMO Objetivo: Investigar a acurácia da ausculta torácica na detecção de mecânica respiratória anormal. Métodos: Foram avaliados 200 pacientes sob ventilação mecânica no pós-operatório imediato de cirurgia cardíaca. Foi avaliada a mecânica do sistema respiratório - complacência estática do sistema respiratório (Cest,sr) e resistência do sistema respiratório (R,sr) - e, em seguida, dois examinadores independentes, que desconheciam os dados referentes à mecânica do sistema respiratório, realizaram a ausculta torácica. Resultados: Nem murmúrio vesicular diminuído/abolido nem crepitações foram associados à Cest,sr reduzida (≤ 60 ml/cmH2O), independentemente do examinador. A acurácia global da ausculta torácica foi de 34,0% e 42,0% para os examinadores A e B, respectivamente. A sensibilidade e a especificidade da ausculta torácica para a detecção de murmúrio vesicular diminuído/abolido e/ou crepitações foi de 25,1% e 68,3%, respectivamente, para o examinador A, versus 36,4% e 63,4%, respectivamente, para o examinador B. Com base nos julgamentos feitos pelo examinador A, houve uma fraca associação entre R,sr aumentada (≥ 15 cmH2O/l/s) e roncos e/ou sibilos (ϕ = 0,31, p < 0,01). A acurácia global para a detecção de roncos e/ou sibilos foi de 89,5% e 85,0% para os examinadores A e B, respectivamente. A sensibilidade e a especificidade para a detecção de roncos e/ou sibilos foi de 30,0% e 96,1%, respectivamente, para o examinador A, versus 10,0% e 93,3%, respectivamente, para o examinador B. Conclusões: A ausculta torácica não parece ser um método diagnóstico acurado para a detecção de mecânica respiratória anormal em pacientes sob ventilação mecânica no pós-operatório imediato de cirurgia cardíaca.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Trastornos Respiratorios/diagnóstico , Trastornos Respiratorios/etiología , Auscultación/métodos , Mecánica Respiratoria , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Valores de Referencia , Trastornos Respiratorios/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Estudios Transversales , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
Abstract Introduction: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a highly prevalent comorbidity in neurological patients and presents a serious health threat, which may lead to outcomes of aspiration pneumonia, ranging from hospitalization to death. This assessment proposes a non-invasive, acoustic-based method to differentiate between individuals with and without signals of penetration and aspiration. Objective: This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic validity of different methods for assessment of swallowing sounds, when compared to videofluroscopy swallowing study to detect oropharyngeal dysphagia. Methods: Articles in which the primary objective was to evaluate the accuracy of swallowing sounds were searched in five electronic databases with no language or time limitations. Accuracy measurements described in the studies were transformed to construct receiver operating characteristic curves and forest plots with the aid of Review Manager v. 5.2 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark). The methodology of the selected studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Results: The final electronic search revealed 554 records, however only 3 studies met the inclusion criteria. The accuracy values (area under the curve) were 0.94 for microphone, 0.80 for doppler, and 0.60 for stethoscope. Conclusion: Based on limited evidence and low methodological quality because few studies were included, with a small sample size, from all index testes found for this systematic review, doppler showed excellent diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination of swallowing sounds, whereas microphone-reported good accuracy discrimination of swallowing sounds of dysphagic patients and stethoscope showed best screening test.
Resumo Introdução: A disfagia orofaríngea é uma comorbidade altamente prevalente em pacientes neurológicos e representa uma séria ameaça à saúde, pode levar a desfechos como pneumonia por aspiração, hospitalização e até morte. A avaliação propõe um método não invasivo, acústico, para diferenciar entre indivíduos com e sem sinais de penetração e aspiração. Objetivo: Esta revisão sistemática analisou a validade diagnóstica de diferentes métodos para avaliação dos sons de deglutição, quando comparados com a videofluoroscopia da deglutição para detectar disfagia orofaríngea. Método: Artigos nos quais o objetivo principal era avaliar a acurácia dos sons de deglutição foram pesquisados em cinco bancos de dados eletrônicos sem limitações de idioma ou tempo de publicação. As medidas de acurácia descritas nos estudos foram transformadas para construir curvas ROC (Receptor Operating Characteristic) e gráfico em floresta (forest plot) com o auxílio do software Review Manager v. 5.2 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Dinamarca). A metodologia dos estudos selecionados foi avaliada com a ferramenta Avaliação da Qualidade de Estudos de Acurácia de Testes Diagnósticos-2. Resultados: A busca eletrônica final resultou na identificação de 554 artigos; no entanto, apenas três estudos preencheram os critérios de inclusão. Os valores de acurácia (área abaixo da curva) foram 0,94 para microfone, 0,80 para doppler e 0,60 para estetoscópio. Conclusão: Baseado nas evidências limitadas e da baixa qualidade metodológica, pois foram poucos os estudos incluídos, e com pequeno tamanho amostral, de todos os testes diagnósticos (index testes) encontrados para essa revisão sistemática o doppler mostrou excelente acurácia diagnóstica na discriminação dos sons de deglutição, o microfone demonstrou uma boa acurácia na discriminação dos sons de pacientes disfágicos e o estetoscópio revelou o melhor teste de triagem.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos , Auscultación/métodos , Sonido , Acústica , Fluoroscopía , Grabación de Cinta de Video , DegluciónAsunto(s)
Auscultación/métodos , Enfisema Mediastínico/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumotórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Torácica/métodos , Sonido , Adolescente , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Enfisema Mediastínico/fisiopatología , Examen Físico/métodos , Neumotórax/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Subcutaneous emphysema (SE) is a clinical condition that occurs when air gets into soft tissues under the skin. This can occur in any part of the body depending on the type of pathology. The most common site is under the skin that covers the chest wall or neck. It is characterized by painless swelling of tissues. The classic clinical sign is a crackling sensation upon touch, resembling that of touching a sponge beneath your fingers. OBJECTIVE: To describe a new way to diagnose subcutaneous emphysema. METHOD: Our finding was a matter of serendipity while inspecting a patient with subcutaneous emphysema using a stethoscope. Instead only hearing the patient's chest, the stethoscope was gently pressed against the skin with SE and so we were able to detect a different sound. RESULTS: This new way to diagnose subcutaneous emphysema consists in pressing the diaphragm part of stethoscope against the patient's skin where SE is supposed to be. Thus, we are able to hear a sound of small bubbles bursting. Crackle noise has an acoustic emission energy that varies between 750-1,200 Hz, considered high frequency. CONCLUSION: Although currently the use of imaging methods is widespread worldwide, we would like to strengthen the value of clinical examination. Auscultation is an essential diagnostic method that has become underestimated with the advances of healthcare and medicine as a whole. We therefore propose a different approach to diagnose SE.
Asunto(s)
Auscultación/métodos , Enfisema Subcutáneo/diagnóstico , Auscultación/instrumentación , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , RuidoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a highly prevalent comorbidity in neurological patients and presents a serious health threat, which may lead to outcomes of aspiration pneumonia, ranging from hospitalization to death. This assessment proposes a non-invasive, acoustic-based method to differentiate between individuals with and without signals of penetration and aspiration. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluated the diagnostic validity of different methods for assessment of swallowing sounds, when compared to videofluroscopy swallowing study to detect oropharyngeal dysphagia. METHODS: Articles in which the primary objective was to evaluate the accuracy of swallowing sounds were searched in five electronic databases with no language or time limitations. Accuracy measurements described in the studies were transformed to construct receiver operating characteristic curves and forest plots with the aid of Review Manager v. 5.2 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark). The methodology of the selected studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. RESULTS: The final electronic search revealed 554 records, however only 3 studies met the inclusion criteria. The accuracy values (area under the curve) were 0.94 for microphone, 0.80 for doppler, and 0.60 for stethoscope. CONCLUSION: Based on limited evidence and low methodological quality because few studies were included, with a small sample size, from all index testes found for this systematic review, doppler showed excellent diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination of swallowing sounds, whereas microphone-reported good accuracy discrimination of swallowing sounds of dysphagic patients and stethoscope showed best screening test.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos , Acústica , Auscultación/métodos , Deglución , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Sonido , Grabación de Cinta de VideoRESUMEN
Summary Introduction: Subcutaneous emphysema (SE) is a clinical condition that occurs when air gets into soft tissues under the skin. This can occur in any part of the body depending on the type of pathology. The most common site is under the skin that covers the chest wall or neck. It is characterized by painless swelling of tissues. The classic clinical sign is a crackling sensation upon touch, resembling that of touching a sponge beneath your fingers. Objective: To describe a new way to diagnose subcutaneous emphysema. Method: Our finding was a matter of serendipity while inspecting a patient with subcutaneous emphysema using a stethoscope. Instead only hearing the patient's chest, the stethoscope was gently pressed against the skin with SE and so we were able to detect a different sound. Results: This new way to diagnose subcutaneous emphysema consists in pressing the diaphragm part of stethoscope against the patient's skin where SE is supposed to be. Thus, we are able to hear a sound of small bubbles bursting. Crackle noise has an acoustic emission energy that varies between 750-1,200 Hz, considered high frequency. Conclusion: Although currently the use of imaging methods is widespread worldwide, we would like to strengthen the value of clinical examination. Auscultation is an essential diagnostic method that has become underestimated with the advances of healthcare and medicine as a whole. We therefore propose a different approach to diagnose SE.
Resumo Introdução: O enfisema subcutâneo é uma condição clínica que ocorre quando o ar entra nos tecidos sob a pele. Isso pode ocorrer em qualquer parte do corpo, dependendo do tipo de patologia. O local mais comum é sob a pele que cobre a parede torácica ou o pescoço. É caracterizado por inchaço indolor de tecidos. O sinal clínico clássico é a sensação de crepitação quando se toca a região afetada, assemelhando-se à sensação de se tocar uma esponja. Objetivo: Descrever uma nova maneira de diagnosticar enfisema subcutâneo. Método: Este achado foi uma serendipidade, caracterizada por inspeção clínica de pacientes com enfisema subcutâneo com uso de estetoscópio. Além da auscultação do tórax do paciente, o estetoscópio foi suavemente pressionado contra a pele com enfisema subcutâneo, sendo possível detectar um ruído diferente. Resultados: Essa nova maneira de diagnosticar enfisema subcutâneo consiste em pressionar o diafragma do estetoscópio contra a pele do paciente supostamente afetada por enfisema subcutâneo, sendo possível ouvir o ruído de pequenas bolhas estourando. O ruído de crepitações tem uma energia de emissão acústica que varia de 750-1.200 Hz, considerada alta frequência. Conclusão: Atualmente, o uso de métodos de imagem é generalizado em todo o mundo, mas gostaríamos de fortalecer o valor do exame clínico. Embora a ausculta seja um método de diagnóstico essencial, foi subestimado à medida que os cuidados de saúde e os medicamentos avançaram. Propomos uma maneira diferente de diagnosticar enfisema subcutâneo.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Auscultación/métodos , Enfisema Subcutáneo/diagnóstico , Auscultación/instrumentación , Diagnóstico Diferencial , RuidoRESUMEN
Physical examination of the abdomen is an essential skill. Knowledge of its clinical anatomy and application is vital for making diagnoses. Misinterpretation of anatomy during examination can have serious consequences. This review addresses understanding of the anatomy, methodology, and complications of abdominal physical examination. It includes particular reference to modern technology and investigations. Physical examination is performed for diagnostic purposes. However, the art of physical examination is declining as more and more clinicians rely on newer technology. This can have regrettable consequences: negligence, waste of time and resources, and deterioration of clinical skills. With a sound knowledge of clinical anatomy, and realization of the importance of physical examination of the abdomen, clinician, and patients alike can benefit. Clin. Anat. 30:352-356, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Asunto(s)
Abdomen/anatomía & histología , Auscultación/métodos , Palpación/métodos , Percusión/métodos , Examen Físico/métodos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Competencia Clínica , Humanos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Este estudo objetivou pesquisar artigos científicos internacionais publicados sobre a ausculta cervical e sua utilização na prática fonoaudiológica. Trata-se de estudo de revisão qualitativa da literatura, envolvendo os últimos 10 anos. Os artigos foram selecionados da base de dados PubMed, utilizando os descritores: auscultation cervical, deglutition e deglutition disorders. A pesquisa deveria ter sido realizada com seres humanos, adultos (maiores que 18 anos) e escrita no idioma inglês. Cada citação recuperada no banco de dados foi analisada independentemente pelos pesquisadores do estudo, visando à pertinência de sua seleção e de sua inclusão ou não no estudo. A metodologia empregada envolveu a formulação da pergunta, a localização e seleção dos estudos, e a avaliação crítica dos artigos, conforme os preceitos do Cochrane Handbook. Como resultados, foram identificados 35 estudos, dos quais 13 foram analisados, pois permitiram acesso ao texto completo e relacionavam-se diretamente ao tema. Concluiu-se que os estudos foram realizados com grupos de sujeitos saudáveis e sujeitos com diferentes tipos de patologia de base. Alguns estudos compararam os padrões encontrados nos diferentes grupos. Constatou-se que parte dos artigos buscou estudar o padrão dos sons da deglutição, com diferentes interfaces: a experiência dos avaliadores; especificidade e sensibilidade do método; e como aprimorar a técnica da ausculta cervical por meio da utilização de outros instrumentos, diferentes do estetoscópio. Com essa análise crítica, concluiu-se que utilização da ausculta cervical é importante como um instrumento utilizado juntamente de outros, na rotina da avaliação clínica da deglutição.
This study aimed to investigate international scientific papers published on the subject of cervical auscultation and its use in speech therapy. The study involved a qualitative review of the literature spanning the last 10 years. Articles were selected from the PubMed database using the following keywords: cervical auscultation, swallowing and swallowing disorders. Research was included that was conducted on adult humans (over 18 years of age) and was written in English. Each citation retrieved from the database was analyzed independently by each of the study researchers to ascertain its relevance for inclusion in the study. The methodology involved formulating the research question, locating and selecting studies and critically evaluating the articles according to the precepts of the Cochrane Handbook. As a result, 35 studies were identified; 13 articles were analyzed because they allowed access to the full text and were related directly to the subject. We found that the studies were performed with groups of healthy subjects and subjects with different types of base pathology. Some studies compared the patterns found in the different groups. Some of the research sought to study the pattern of swallowing sounds with different factors - evaluator experience, the specificity and sensitivity of the method and how to improve the technique of cervical auscultation through the use of instruments other than the stethoscope. The conclusion of this critical analysis is that cervical auscultation is an important tool to be used in conjunction with other assessment methods in the routine clinical evaluation of swallowing.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Auscultación/métodos , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Deglución/fisiología , Auscultación/instrumentación , Faringe/fisiología , LogopediaRESUMEN
With the advent of computing and micro computing, several applications based on Digital Sound have emerged around the world. Much analog equipment and electronics have gained new functions due to evolution and the low cost of microprocessors and integrated circuits. The rapidly expanding user community of such equipment allowed the advancement of research and development of numerous applications in which the Digital Sound participates actively, including, tests, treatments and therapies. In addition to solutions for use in laboratories, clinics and hospitals, there emerged devices for domestic use and handling, enabling faster dissemination and exploitation of advances, and providing the necessary feedback in the evolution of technologies applied. The massive use of Digital Sound encouraged research involving frequency bands used widely in health equipment (infrasounds and ultrasounds). Through the methodology of literature review, this paper seeks to explain the evolution of different applications of Digital Sound in Health, as well as indicate future research.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Acústica/métodos , Auscultación/métodos , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Procesamiento de Señales Asistido por Computador , Espectrografía del Sonido/métodos , Animales , HumanosAsunto(s)
Femenino , Embarazo , Anomalías Congénitas/embriología , Auscultación/métodos , Bioética/educación , Feto/anatomía & histología , Feto/embriología , Medicina Reproductiva/educación , Medicina Reproductiva , Terapias Fetales/métodos , Transfusión de Sangre Intrauterina/métodos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/métodos , Desarrollo Tecnológico/métodos , Centro Latinoamericano de Perinatología, Salud de la Mujer y Reproductiva , Relaciones Médico-PacienteRESUMEN
This study aimed to investigate international scientific papers published on the subject of cervical auscultation and its use in speech therapy. The study involved a qualitative review of the literature spanning the last 10 years. Articles were selected from the PubMed database using the following keywords: cervical auscultation, swallowing and swallowing disorders. Research was included that was conducted on adult humans (over 18 years of age) and was written in English. Each citation retrieved from the database was analyzed independently by each of the study researchers to ascertain its relevance for inclusion in the study. The methodology involved formulating the research question, locating and selecting studies and critically evaluating the articles according to the precepts of the Cochrane Handbook. As a result, 35 studies were identified; 13 articles were analyzed because they allowed access to the full text and were related directly to the subject. We found that the studies were performed with groups of healthy subjects and subjects with different types of base pathology. Some studies compared the patterns found in the different groups. Some of the research sought to study the pattern of swallowing sounds with different factors - evaluator experience, the specificity and sensitivity of the method and how to improve the technique of cervical auscultation through the use of instruments other than the stethoscope. The conclusion of this critical analysis is that cervical auscultation is an important tool to be used in conjunction with other assessment methods in the routine clinical evaluation of swallowing.
Asunto(s)
Auscultación/métodos , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Deglución/fisiología , Auscultación/instrumentación , Humanos , Faringe/fisiología , LogopediaRESUMEN
Blind source separation by independent component analysis has been applied extensively in the biomedical field for extracting different contributing sources in a signal. Regarding lung sounds analysis to isolate the adventitious sounds from normal breathing sound is relevant. In this work the performance of FastICA, Infomax, JADE and TDSEP algorithms was assessed using different scenarios including simulated fine and coarse crackles embedded in recorded normal breathing sounds. Our results pointed out that Infomax obtained the minimum Amari index (0.10037) and the maximum signal to interference ratio (1.4578e+009). Afterwards, Infomax was applied to 25 channels of recorded normal breathing sound where simulated fine and coarse crackles were added including acoustic propagation effects. A robust blind crackle separation could improve previous results in generating an adventitious acoustic thoracic imaging.